23

ISABELA STATE UNIVERSITY

Echague Campus

CENTRAL GRADUATE SCHOOL

Dear Respondent,
The undersigned is conducting a research entitled “The Educators’ Perspectives on
the Implementation of K to 12 Curriculum”.
In this regard, kindly provide your sincere and honest answers to the checklist herein
provided. The output of this study will be for the benefit of the Department of Education in
general.
Rest assured that your responses will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Thank You and More Power.

Very truly yours,

ROEL D. MABBAYAD
 24

THE EDUCATORS’ PERSPECTIVES ON THE

IMPLEMENTATION
K TO 12 CURRICULUM

District: ____________________________
School: _____________________________

Part I. Respondent’s Profile

Instruction: Please fill the blank or encircle the appropriate letter of your response
in each item.
1. Name of the Respondents (Optional): ________________________________
2. Gender: a. Male b. Female
3. Age: ____________________
4. Marital Status: a. Single b. Married c. Widow/Widower d. Separated
5. Academic Rank (Please specify):___________________
6. Highest Educational Attainment:
a. BS/AB
b. MAT/MA/MS
c. Ph.D., Ed. D,
d. Others (Please specify): _______________
7. Monthly salary: _________________
8. Civil Service Eligibility/ Gov,t Examination/s Passed: ________________
9. No of Years In Service: _________________
 25

Part II The Questionnaire

1. Perception of the Respondents on the Extent of Implementation in of
General Administration after the K to 12 Implementation.

Direction: Put a check mark on 5 if HIGHLY IMPROVED, 4

IMPROVED 3 if MODERATELY IMPROVED, 2 if STATUS QUO
and 1 if DECLINED.

5. Highly Improved
4. Improved
3. Moderately Improved
2. Status Quo
1. Declined

5 4 3 2 1
1. Information and dissemination of the goals and
objectives of the K to 12 Program
2. Appropriateness and clarity of organizational
structure of the DepEd in the Implementation of
the program.
3. Implementation of the faculty Development
plan.
4. Training of the faculty for the K to 12 Program.
5. Adequacy of materials for the program.
6. Support from higher authorities.
7. Adequacy of manpower.

2. Perception of the Respondents on the Extent of Implementation in Terms of

Instruction/ teaching for the teachers.

Direction: Put a check mark on 5 if HIGHLY IMPROVED, 4

IMPROVED 3 if MODERATELY IMPROVED, 2 if STATUS QUO and
1 if DECLINED.

5. Highly Improved
4. Improved
3. Moderately Improved
2. Status Quo
1. Declined
 26

5 4 3 2 1
1. Submission of lesson plans
2. Classroom supervision
3. Integration of values
4. Use of appropriate instructional material
5. Employment of modern strategies
6. Purchase of instructional materials
7.Clarity of grading system for the new
program
8. Ease in carrying out the objectives
9. Collegial mentoring/ free exchange of
ideas among teachers
10. Inputs from supervisors

3. Perception of the Respondents on the Extent of Implementation in terms of

Instruction/teaching for the pupils/class room set up.

Direction: Put a check mark on 5 if HIGHLY IMPROVED, 4

IMPROVED 3 if MODERATELY IMPROVED, 2 if STATUS QUO and
1 if DECLINED.

5. Highly Improved
4. Improved
3. Moderately Improved
2. Status Quo
1. Declined

5 4 3 2 1
1. Attitudes of the learners towards
learning
2. Support of parents
3. Availability of textbook
4. Availability of teaching aids.
5. Support from higher authorities.

6. Written outputs of the students

7. Oral participations.
 27

8. Attendance of pupils

9. Interest in learning.
10. Completion of assignments.

4. Benefits of K to 12 Curriculum as perceived by the administrators and

teachers.
Direction: Put a check mark on 5 if HIGHLY IMPROVED, 4
IMPROVED 3 if MODERATELY IMPROVED, 2 if STATUS QUO and
1 if DECLINED.

5. Highly Improved
4. Improved
3. Moderately Improved
2. Status Quo
1. Declined

5 4 3 2 1
1. Academics performance of the
learners.
2. Opportunities for trainings and
seminars.
3. Budgetary allotment.
4. Promotion
5. Working environment.
6. Sharing of supplies, other
materials, equipment from within
the district.
7. Participation of teachers in the
planning of activities.
8. Sports program status.
9. Attitudes of the learners towards
the subject taught.
10. Enrolment
 28

5. Problems met by the Teachers in the Implementation of K to 12 Curriculum

Direction: Put a check mark on 5 if HIGHLY IMPROVED, 4 IMPROVED
3 if MODERATELY IMPROVED, 2 if STATUS QUO and 1 if
DECLINED.

5. Highly Improved
4. Improved
3. Moderately Improved
2. Status Quo
1. Declined

5 4 3 2 1
1. Overlapping/ duplication and
function.
2. Lack of textbook and other
instruction materials.
3. Unstable policies and no clear
guidelines
4. To much bureaucracy.
5. Poor dissemination and policies
affecting teachers.
6. Delayed relay communication
7. Slow action to request.
8. Too much paper works.

6. General perception of Teachers on the K to 12 Curriculum.

Please put a check mark (/) on the parentheses of your choice.
Do you like the K to 12 Curriculum? Yes ( ) No ( )

Please feel free to write additional information not captured in this questionnaire.
Thank you!

The Researchers