1 vues

- Resource
- Aubrey Yachts
- Problem Review Set Capital Structure and Leverage
- Project Financial Management Capital Structures of Smes
- Macroeconomic Analysis in Consumer Durable Industry
- Cf Tobacco
- Financial Planning and Capital Structure Decision
- FORECASTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: PROFORMA Financial ANALYSIS
- Capital Structure Decisions Essay
- 361-CH13Concise
- The Role of Capital in Financial Institutions
- An Insight Into the Capital Structure Determinants of the Pharma Companies in Bangladesh
- 3Q Accounts
- 361-CH13Concise
- Reserves
- 1 Financial Statements Cash Flows and Taxes
- KBLM - ICMD 2009 (B14)
- Corp Liq Ijtaf 2011
- Reduction of Share Capital
- 1. Ownership, Institutions, And Capital Structure Evidence From China (8)

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

These narratives are provided to guide your answers in the Practice case studies. See the

guidelines, but keep in mind, other answers may be acceptable also. Keep in mind that there

are other possible correct ways to answer the same question. Guidance is given in italics.

You need not number your calculations quite as extensively, if you work clearly and number

the calculations that are used in the evaluation, it should suffice.

Case 1

This case basically encompasses dividend payouts, capital structure decision making, other

issues in capital structure decision making and financial ratio analysis.

The first thing to take into account is that there are specific requirements that you must meet.

You can see that, specifically, financial performance, expected dividend pay-outs, the cost of

financing and risk needs to be considered.

Then there are also many other aspects one can look at that are not specifically asked for,

but we will start with the specifics as that is obviously required.

The very first thing we need to consider is whether scenario 2 is necessary at all. If the

amount of funds raised paired with retained earnings are not enough, it would be necessary

to borrow further and we need to also address scenario 2.

So let’s see:

Is Scenario 2 necessary?

The offering would have raised R122 per share – 8% = (122x.92) 112.24 per share.

The company sells 5 million of them, so in total: (5mil x 112.24 ) R 561 200 000 will be

raised.

If we add to this the current retained earnings of R300 000 000, we get R861 200 000 [A]

which is less than the required funds and therefore it will indeed be necessary to raise debt

financing for option 2.

From here, you can construct a table with the values of first, the WACC of each scenario, the

net profit, the equity and ROE then the expected dividend payout (the ratio is given and only

the Rand amount is necessary).

The offering would have raised R122 per share – 8% = (122x.92) 112.24 per share. [1]

The company sells 5 million of them, so in total: (5mil x 112.24 [1] ) R 561 200 000 will be

raised.

The firm will have to raise R900 million – R861,2 million [A] = R38,8 million [3].

It can raise funds at an issuance price of R135 per share – 8% issuance cost.

1

It means the firm has to issue R38,8 million / (R135 – 8%) = 312 399 shares [4]

Therefore, it will have 25 million + 312 399 [4] = 25 312 399 shares outstanding. [5]

So, its market price of equity will be: R135 x 25 312 399 [5] = R3 417,17 billion [6]

The cost thereof is 11% before tax, so the after tax cost is: 11% x (1 – T) = 8,58% [8]

The total market value of capital is then R3 billion + R3 417 billion [6] = R6 417 billion. [9]

Weight of equity: R3,417 billion [6] ÷ R6 417 billion [9] = 53,25% [10]

So, the WACC will be: (12,4% [7] x 0,5325 [10]) + (8,58% [8] x 0,4675 [11]) = 10,61% [12]

The net profit for the company is then still R600 million as no interest payments are

introduced and no information regarding possible sales growth was provided.

What we need to determine next, is ROE, EPS, P/E even is possible as measures of

performance. Then, the expected dividend per share and the risk profile of the firm.

For the calculation of ROE, we need to remember that ROE makes use of the book value of

equity, which will be R4 billion from the original listing, R300 million in retained earnings,

R561,2 million and another R38,8 million raised giving a total of R4.9 billion. [13]

The EPS would be determinant on the amount of issued shares, which is 25 312 399

[calculation 4 + 20 000 000 in issue + 5000 000 from the book build], giving EPS of R600

million ÷ 25 312 399 = R23,07. [15a]

The expected dividend is then R600 million x 20% = R120 million in total. [16]

So, R120 million ÷ 25 312 399 = R4,74 per share. (R4,61 is also OK, it’s just rounding) [17]

Discussion:

Due to the fact that the beta in the related sub-sectors where the firm is investing is similar to

that of the firm, it would mean that, given the information available, the effect of financial risk

is the only source of risk we can really comment on is that related to leverage. Technically,

the firm lowered its leverage, even though it only slightly by choosing equity only financing.

This would likely lower its financial risk slightly.

2

One could use Hamada’s equation to estimate the unlevered beta and re-lever it, we will

however just comment on it as that is what was required.

The total amount spent on dividend would under the current policy only be influenced by

changes in net profit, but the dividend per share would be diluted because of the new shares

issued. This would be compared to the dividend paid if debt is used.

Using equity financing only will lead to the company having a WACC of 10,61% [12].

The cost of financing needs to be compared to the other two scenarios and the performance

ratios calculated above can easily be compared to each other in a table.

ROE will be 12,24% [14] and the P/E ratio is expected to be 5,85 [15b].

Again, this will be compared to the ROE and P/E of the debt options.

In scenario 2, you will just finance the R38,8m shortfall with debt.

3

Case 2

As the firm will only have to repay the loan amount at the end of the term, servicing interest

at the cost of borrowing will lead to the cost of borrowing equalling the loan amount.

Year 0 1 2 3 4

Principle 0 0 0 0 20000000

Total 1728000 1728000 1728000 21728000

NPV @ 8,64% R 20 000 000

Year 0 1 2 3 4

Lease payment 0 -7 400 -7 400 -7 400 -7 400 000

000 000 000

Tax Shield 2072000 2072000 2072000 2072000

Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0

Depreciation tax 0 -1 400 -1 400 -1 400 -1 400 000

shield forgone 000 000 000

Cost of borrowing 20 000 000

avoided

Net maintenance 1440000 1440000 1440000 1440000

avoided

Net residual value -7 200 000

Net 20000000 -5 288 -5288000 -5288000 -5288000

000

NAL -2 436 496

The net advantage of leasing is negative, therefore it would be better for the firm to borrow

and buy the machine than to lease it.

4

Case 3

Guidance:

The case made it clear that none of the variables in the acquired firm would change and that

the only real effect of the acquisition is that it remits its profits to the acquiring firm and of

course the R3 billion require to buy the firm.

What was required, was for you to determine the increase in assets of the acquiring (lets call

it the “original” firm) and then the sources of financing that goes towards it, such as

spontaneous liabilities and the profits retained. There were some assumption you could have

made which would have influenced your answer, see the last part of the solution for

guidance on this.

Solution:

Current assets become 14437.5 and fixed assets (after 2,5% growth) become 2562.5. This

totals then 17000 for assets. It used to be 16250, so growth in spontaneous assets is

R750m.

Now, this has to be financed somehow. We can apply spontaneous liabilities first as we can

increase our accounts payable and line of credit maybe to fund some of the increase in

current assets.

Here we have to note that there is an interpretation choice that you could make. One is to

consider short term debt as spontaneous; the other is to not do so. In the first case, short

term debt will also grow, in the other, it will stay constant. We will show the case where short

term debt is also assumed spontaneous, but offer an explanation of how to see if you got it

right if you assumed otherwise at the end.

Assumption: short term debt is spontaneous (as the case did not go into detail on it)

So, current liabilities would grow from a total of 6600 to 6930. That means it grew by R330m

and it will be used to finance the growth in spontaneous assets.

Then, we need to consider the profit of the firm. The R1b from the acquired firm is added to

net profit

The sales of the original firm grows to R21b with a profit margin of 12,5% leading to a net

profit of R2625m.

The acquired firm also contributes R1b of profit, leading to a total net profit of R3625m.

This is then applied to the increase in assets together with the increase in current liabilities:

5

This means we had R1211,25 more than our financing requirement before taking the

acquisition costs into account.

However, the amount of R3b of financing also needs to be taken into account:

If you assumed that short term debt was not spontaneous, subtract R170m from the answer

supplied to see if you got it right.

6

Case 4

NPV

Year: 0 1 2 3 4

Cost -7000000

Sales 2500000 3500000 4000000 2000000

Var cost -500000 -700000 -800000 -400000

Fixed costs -200000 -200000 -200000 -200000

Gross CF 1800000 2600000 3000000 1400000

Tax -15000 -255000 -375000 -45000

Residual value 500000

NOWC -1000000 1000000

Net CF -8000000 1785000 2345000 2625000 2855000

Tax effects

Gross CF 1800000 2600000 3000000 1400000

Depreciation -1750000 -1750000 -1750000 -1750000

Recoupment 500000

Net taxable 50000 850000 1250000 150000

Tax payable 15000 255000 375000 45000

The remainder of the case relies mostly on the discount rate to be used.

The company has R2m in retained earnings and the company needs to finance an amount

of R8m (including NOWC). So, the firm needs to raise R6m of financing.

Scenario 1:

Scenario 1:

Scenario 2:

7

Scenario 3:

Leading to WACC’s, adjusted WACC’s (real rate: RR); unadjusted NPV’s; and inflation

adjusted NPV’s (IANPV) of:

If inflation is taken into account the project would be acceptable in all cases, though the use

of debt financing only yields the highest NPV regardless. The only scenario where the

project is not acceptable is if equity is used, to finance the expansion and debt only used to

top up the amount required (scenario 1).

- ResourceTransféré paraumit0099
- Aubrey YachtsTransféré parKamen Kamen
- Problem Review Set Capital Structure and LeverageTransféré parTom Falco
- Project Financial Management Capital Structures of SmesTransféré parprashant agra
- Macroeconomic Analysis in Consumer Durable IndustryTransféré parPatelMayur
- Cf TobaccoTransféré parAzeem Nini
- Financial Planning and Capital Structure DecisionTransféré parEthan Perez
- FORECASTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: PROFORMA Financial ANALYSISTransféré parMohsin Manzoor
- Capital Structure Decisions EssayTransféré parHamid Khan
- 361-CH13ConciseTransféré parSana Ur Rehman
- The Role of Capital in Financial InstitutionsTransféré parSaad Alamgir
- An Insight Into the Capital Structure Determinants of the Pharma Companies in BangladeshTransféré parSaurabh Garg
- 3Q AccountsTransféré parSyed Muhammad Ali Sadiq
- 361-CH13ConciseTransféré parRooja Hdad
- ReservesTransféré parhocine109
- 1 Financial Statements Cash Flows and TaxesTransféré parAyanleke Julius Oluwaseunfunmi
- KBLM - ICMD 2009 (B14)Transféré parIshidaUryuu
- Corp Liq Ijtaf 2011Transféré parAakash Khandelwal
- Reduction of Share CapitalTransféré parDeeyla Kamarulzaman
- 1. Ownership, Institutions, And Capital Structure Evidence From China (8)Transféré parLộc Lém Lỉnh
- Question 008Transféré parNizam Uddin Masud
- Managerial Ownership and Firm ValueTransféré parNora Anastasia Simbolon
- ARA-01-2014-0016.pdfTransféré parDita
- 12th Commerce Secretarial PracticeTransféré parAmandeep Singh Manku
- 2001 Interim Results Release EngTransféré parVikas Singhal
- 13533-49208-1-PB.pdfTransféré parAgung Wicaksono
- tqmTransféré parAtul Malhotra
- Capital StructureTransféré parvinelectronics
- 3970-12695-1-SMTransféré parsilentwattpadreader
- download-2.pdfTransféré parTemp

- Silver River Manufacturing Company (SRM).docxTransféré parSiddhartha Chhetri
- Financial Risk ManagementTransféré parArjun Ghose
- Cima F3 NotesTransféré parPablo Ruibal
- Journal of Corporate FinanceTransféré parAyu Intarti
- i Pe Final Study GuideTransféré parssciolist
- Ernst & Young-The World Islamic Banking Competitiveness Report 2011-2012Transféré parHoss Bedoui
- Capital StructureTransféré parSahil Jain
- Ratio Analysis_Financial Statement AnalysisTransféré parAshutosh Kumar
- JPM - Eye on the Market Outlook 2017Transféré parZerohedge
- Theory Questions 1 FMTransféré parQuestionscastle Friend
- Automation of Inventory Mgm-Synopsis (1)Transféré parNageshwar singh
- Capital Structure (Fm) 2003Transféré parpoojapatil90
- nirmaTransféré parHimanshu Prajapati
- Razin, Sadka - A Pecking Order Among FDI, Debt and Portfolio Equity FlowsTransféré parFungo
- Arlington Value’s 2013 LetterTransféré pargreyistari
- Apollo Tyres Final)Transféré parMitisha Gaur
- BrealeyMyersTransféré parHachikuroba
- CAPITAL STRUTURE & LEVERAGE AT GRAPHITE INDIA LTD.SATPUR‚ NASHIKTransféré parAnonymous CwJeBCAXp
- Financial Ratio AnalysisTransféré parLaurentia Nurak
- Financial Analyss of Boeing and AirbusTransféré parMittu Tandel
- Conceptual Framework of Profitability and Capital StructureTransféré parkaderderka
- 3 ASSESSING FIRMS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.pdfTransféré parJu Raizah
- Quiz2 PracticeTransféré parRiskiBiz
- c5+.pdfTransféré parDhanny Miharja
- CasesTransféré parJonah Moyo
- Assisting Housing Affordability ISA Discussion Paper FINAL 2017Transféré parEmma
- CS IJABF Ratnam Vijakumaran-correctedTransféré parAnonymous OM7xCjyYx
- RAP.docxTransféré parRohail Amjad
- Risk Management, BaselTransféré parManish Kumar
- Practice 1Transféré parDavid Cann

## Bien plus que des documents.

Découvrez tout ce que Scribd a à offrir, dont les livres et les livres audio des principaux éditeurs.

Annulez à tout moment.