Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group
Germ Cell Working Group
Chief Investigator:
Dr Juliet Hale
Page
Contact Details …………………………………………………………………………… 1
1. Objectives ………………………………………………………………………… 6
2. Background ……………………………………………………………………….. 6
Table 1 – Risk Groups ……………………………………………………. 10
Figure 1 – Flow Sheet – Overview of Management of Germ Cell Tumours 11
3. Patient Eligibility …………………………………………………………………. 12
3.1 Eligibility Criteria ………………………………………………………… 12
3.2 Exclusion Criteria ………………………………………………………… 12
4. Investigations at diagnosis ………………………………………………………… 12
5. Histopathology ……………………………………………………………………. 13
6. Staging ……………………………………………………………………………. 13
Table 2 – Histological Classification …………………………………….. 14
Table 3 – TNM Staging …………………………………………………… 15
7. Tumour Markers …………………………………………………………………... 16
8. Treatment Strategy ………………………………………………………………… 16
8.1 Overview ………………………………………………………………….. 16
8.2 Surgical guidelines ………………………………………………………… 17
8.2.1 Testicular Tumours ………………………………………………… 17
8.2.2 Ovarian Tumours …………………………………………………... 17
8.2.3 Sacrococcygeal Tumours …………………………………………... 18
8.2.4 Mediastinal/Thoracic Tumours ……………………………………. 18
8.2.5 Vagina/Uterus ……………………………………………………… 19
8.2.6 Other Sites …………………………………………………………. 19
8.2.7 Relapse …………………………………………………………….. 19
8.3 Management according to Risk Group ……………………………….……. 19
8.3.1 Low Risk …………………………………………………………… 19
8.3.2 Intermediate Risk ………………………………………………….. 20
8.3.3 High Risk …………………………………………………………... 20
8.3.4 Recommendations for adolescents …………………………………. 20
8.4 Chemotherapy Administration …………………………………………….. 21
8.4.1 Details of chemotherapy …………………………………………… 21
- To stratify and reduce treatment for patients with extracranial germ cell tumours according to
prognostic factors derived from analysis of UKCCSG Study GC8901 (GCII) whilst maintaining
event free survival (EFS)
- To continue to treat newly diagnosed patients with extracranial germ cell tumours requiring
chemotherapy with a Carboplatin based strategy
- To develop a common strategy for the treatment of patients with recurrent or progressive
extracranial germ cell tumours
- To develop a common strategy for the management of immature and mature teratoma including
follow-up strategies to permit early detection of yolk sac recurrence
2. Background
Germ cell tumours (GCTs) comprise a rare and highly varied group of tumours occurring at several
anatomical sites and with a histological spectrum ranging from mature and immature teratoma to
four different malignant sub-types. Nevertheless it has become possible to standardise a surgical
and chemotherapeutic strategy across the range of tumours.
Prior to the introduction of platinum based chemotherapy, survival of children with malignant germ
cell tumours (MGCTs) was poor. The combination of cisplatin, vinblastine and bleomycin(PVB)
used successfully in adult testicular MGCTs [1] was initially toxic when applied to children [2].
The introduction of hybrid cisplatin containing regimens in children improved survival rates to 47
– 87% [3–7]. More recently the French, German and North American groups have reported
survival from 75 – 100% in paediatric MGCTs using cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin (BEP), BEP
with high dose cisplatin or cisplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide (PEI) [8–12].
In order to reduce the oto- and nephrotoxicity associated with cisplatin containing regimes the
UKCCSG has, since 1989, been using a carboplatin based strategy, GC8901(GCII), with
carboplatin 600mg/m2 (AUC 7.9), etoposide 360mg/m2 and bleomycin 15mg/m2 per course, for
paediatric MGCT. When GC8901 opened an early version of the Calvert formula was used to
calculate carboplatin dose based on uncorrected GFR and an anticipated AUC of 6. Subsequent
pharmacokinetic analysis has shown the actual AUC of 600mg/m2 to be 7.9. Approximately 75%
of patients treated on GCII had carboplatin prescribed according to surface area rather than GFR.
Patients were given the number of courses to achieve normalisation of tumour markers plus two
additional courses.
Previous studies have shown carboplatin to be less effective than cisplatin, including the French
TGM90 study which only gave 400mg/m2 every 6 weeks [13] and studies in adult MGCT [14-16]
which also used lower doses of carboplatin than GCII.
The UKCCSG Germ Cell Tumour Working Group has recently completed analysis of outcome in
patients with extracranial MGCTs treated on GCII between January 1989 and December 1997 [17].
In preparation for the next UK Germ Cell Tumour Study the Working Group has held meetings
with SFOP and with the International Germ Cell Group (UK, France, Germany, USA, Italy,
Sweden). The focus of meetings with SFOP was to define risk groups for MGCTs based on prior
work by the French group [18]. Multivariate analysis of GCII has also shown alpha-fetoprotein
(AFP) level at diagnosis (< 10,000 or >10,000), tumour site and stage to be important prognostic
variables with AFP level being the most significant. Pure human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)
secreting tumours are uncommon in childhood and HCG level at diagnosis does not emerge as a
prognostic variable. Furthermore patients with germinoma/seminoma do well regardless of stage.
These factors were combined to define three risk groups – see Table 1. Analysis of outcome for
GCII patients retrospectively allocated to one of these risk groups (under one year olds were
allocated ignoring AFP level) showed the following:
The high number of events in the Low Risk group is accounted for by ‘surgery only’ Stage 1
patients relapsing. All of these patients were rescued with JEB.
The International Germ Cell Tumour Group hopes to develop a collaborative protocol that may
allow randomised questions to be answered. Until this is possible it is proposed that the UKCCSG
continues to use JEB for the treatment of MGCTs in view of its demonstrable efficacy. However,
although JEB has had relatively little toxicity in GCII, one child developed acute myeloid
leukaemia (without 11q23 abnormality) and in German MGCT Trials 6/616 developed AML [19].
Other toxicities involved Grade 3 deafness in one child, transient Grade 1/2 deafness in 5 and
pulmonary toxicity in 10 (transient in 9) [17]. The median number of courses of JEB given was 5
(5 for Intermediate Risk and 6 for High Risk). It would therefore seem appropriate to reduce
treatment for MGCTs if possible.
A strategy of reducing the length of therapy would also be in line with treatment given by other
paediatric and adult MGCT groups. Both in the USA and Germany paediatric “intermediate risk”
patients receive 3 courses of chemotherapy and “high risk” patients receive 4 courses of
chemotherapy [10,11]. Similarly adult patients with MGCT generally receive 3 or 4 courses of
BEP. Both paediatric groups use a cisplatin based strategy but analysis of GCII suggests JEB is
likely to be equivalent [17]. Any such reduction in therapy will need to be subject to ‘stopping
rules’.
Fortunately relapse is a rare event in childhood MGCTs. At present approximately 2 patients per
year treated on GCII relapse or develop progressive disease. We are unable to identify these
patients sufficiently well at diagnosis to intensify their first line therapy without also doing so for
many patients effectively treated by JEB. Currently these patients are treated with a mixture of
schedules containing cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, actinomycin D, ifosfamide and cisplatin and
approximately 50% are salvaged. In this small group there is no particular pattern of treatment
associated with successful salvage. However, in order to establish tumour and treatment related
factors associated with successful second line therapy it is important to have a defined relapse
strategy. This protocol will develop such a strategy.
Cisplatin has been used successfully in salvage therapy for patients initially treated with
carboplatin in the SFOP study TGM 90 [8] and has also been used as part of retrieval therapy in
adult MGCTs initially treated with cisplatin [21]. Ifosfamide also has significant activity in
refractory MGCTs [22,23]. As etoposide forms part of first line therapy in the UK, its use in
second line treatment may increase the risk of secondary AML and vinblastine, which is also active
in MGCTs, will therefore be used instead.
High-dose therapy (HDT) has been used in both first line therapy of poor risk MGCTs and in
salvage therapy in adults [24-26] and appears to have a role in both these situations when remission
can be achieved prior to HDT. However no role has been defined in the paediatric setting and in
this protocol HDT will not be part of initial salvage therapy. In contrast the use of surgery to
achieve remission may well be important for MGCTs at some sites [27].
Immature teratoma is the sub-type of GCT where there has been most controversy about
management. Immature teratomas occur principally in ovarian and extragonadal sites. These
tumours include representative tissues from all three germ cell layers and, in addition, immature
tissues, usually neuroepithelium but immature ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm can be present.
This can give these tumours an alarming appearance. Immature teratomas can occur in pure form,
can contain microfoci of yolk sac tumour [28] or can be part of mixed tumours containing MGCT
or non germ cell malignant elements such as PNET or Neuroblastoma [29-31]. The degree of
immaturity is generally graded according to one of several classifications [20,32-34]. In ovarian
primaries it is not uncommon to find peritoneal deposits of mature glial tissue, gliomatosis
peritonei [32,35], or of immature teratoma.
Due to the alarming appearance of these tumours and their tendency to peritoneal spread
chemotherapy has commonly been used in adults [32]. However several paediatric studies have
shown that initial surgery to remove all tumour, except for gliomatosis peritonei, and a ‘watch and
wait’ policy, is appropriate for most patients [29,36-38]. The significance of elevated AFP at
diagnosis is uncertain. Some tumours contain immature liver or intestine which stains positively for
AFP and may be responsible for raised serum levels. In the POG/CCG study only 45% of patients
with microfoci of yolk sac tumour had raised AFP for age (max 1045 ng/ml) and 26% of patients
with normal AFP had microfoci of yolk sac tumour. In addition 26% of patients with pure
immature teratoma had raised AFP (max 139ng/ml) [29]. This protocol will use a strategy of initial
complete surgery and ‘watch and wait’ for these tumours unless definite non germ cell malignancy
is present.
Low Risk
Boys who have inadvertently had an initial trans-scrotal biopsy but are otherwise Stage 1 can be
included in this group with very close follow-up (See Surgical Guidelines 8.2.1)
Intermediate Risk
All other sites, AFP < 10,000 kU/L, Stage 2+3 except thoracic tumours
High Risk
AFP > 10,000 kU/L except all Stage 1 tumours and testis < 5yrs Stage 2,3 + 4
Complete staging
Observe Observe
Monitor AFP/HCG Monitor AFP/HCG
11 GC III/Final Version1.0/September 2004
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
3. Patient Eligibility
4. Investigations at diagnosis
i) Imaging Ultrasound of primary site
Chest X-Ray (CXR)
MRI/CT scan of primary site and regional nodes
CT scan lungs and liver
Bone scan
iii) Bone marrow aspirate and trephine if other metastatic disease is present
vi) Audiometry
5. Histopathology
Germ cell tumours have previously been classified according to Dehner 1986 [20]. A recent
international meeting of pathologists involved with paediatric GCTs has agreed a slightly revised
classification (Table 2). For this protocol all tumours will be reported according to this
classification.
The classification of immature teratoma will be according to Dehner’s modification [20] of earlier
classifications [32,33] rather than the classification devised by Gonzalez-Crussi, 1982 [34].
Grading is scored from the slide with the largest amount of aggregated immature tissue. It should
also be noted whether there are microfoci of yolk sac tumour present as described by Heifetz [28].
Central pathology review will be requested on all patients entered into the study. Please send one
H&E slide and four unstained slides from all blocks taken.
If rapid review of histology is required this can be provided by direct contact with the study
pathology co-ordinators.
Future progress in the management of GCTs depends on clearer understanding of their biological
behaviour. Banking of tumour material is therefore strongly encouraged as part of the study, and
should be carried out in accordance with the UKCCSG Tumour Banking Protocol (98 BS05).
Tumour tissue excess to diagnostic requirements, should be snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored, ideally in several pieces, at less than -50°C. Since mixed GCTs are unlikely to be
homogeneous in appearance, particular care should be taken in selecting tissue for banking.
Features suggestive of malignancy within mixed tumours include the presence of mucoid or
encephaloid areas, and proximity to sites of haemorrhage. In cases of doubt, and where material
allows, multiple sampling is recommended.
6. Staging
In order to facilitate comparisons between studies, a TNM staging system (Table 3) will be used
rather than the site specific systems used in previous studies.
The clinical/radiological stage should only be used for tumours diagnosed on markers and
imaging alone. For all other tumours, whether biopsied or initially resected, the post-surgical
stage should be used.
For tumours designated pT1 (Clinical Stage 1) it is essential that complete staging imaging has
been undertaken and is negative.
Ovarian tumours with capsular breach (pre-operatively or at the time of surgery) are Stage 2.
Ovarian tumours with ascites detected on imaging or at surgery and not sent for cytology are
assumed to be Stage 3. Ascites sent for cytology and found to be negative for malignant cells can
be ignored for staging purposes. Bilateral ovarian tumours are staged according to the individual
stage of each tumour.
I Germinoma a. Intratubular
b. Invasive
II Teratoma:
A Mature
V Choriocarcinoma
VI Gonadoblastoma
NB GCTs with mixed malignant germ cell elements are now VII and not IIc/IId
as previously
8. Treatment Strategy
8.1 Overview
All patients with extracranial GCT should have measurement of AFP and HCG and staging
investigations. In the absence of metastases an assessment of resectability should be made. Most
resectable tumours will be gonadal primaries. Unresectable tumours should have an initial biopsy.
Avoidance of mutilating surgery is essential and there may be occasional cases where the clinical
situation dictates diagnosis on imaging and markers only, for example mediastinal primaries or
patients with renal failure.
Delayed surgery can be considered for residual masses at the end of chemotherapy but the
philosophy of avoiding surgery with significant morbidity is important. Only 2 of 45 children
having delayed surgery in GCII had any viable malignant tumour, the rest having necrosis/fibrosis
or mature/immature teratoma [17]. Consideration should be given as to whether a strategy of close
follow-up with serum markers and imaging is more appropriate. If in doubt discuss with Chief
Investigator.
Chemotherapy strategy will then be determined by the patient’s allocated Risk Group (Table
1).
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Scrotal and abdominal ultrasound
(2) Ideally the results of serum AFP/HCG should be available but it is
recognised that exploration may be urgent given the differential diagnosis of
testicular torsion.
Operation
(1) Orchidectomy through an inguinal incision with radical orchidectomy and
high ligation of the spermatic cord. Scrotal orchidectomy is inappropriate.
Control of testicular vessels and vas deferens should be gained prior to
testicular mobilisation. Incision should be extended if there is a risk of
tumour rupture.
(2) If scrotal biopsy has inadvertently occurred, the scrotum is assumed to be
contaminated and the tumour is at least Stage 2. An inguinal orchidectomy
should be performed but hemi-scrotectomy is probably unnecessary. In the
absence of metastatic disease, the boy requires very careful follow-up of
serum markers and chemotherapy only if markers remain elevated or rise.
(3) If scrotal orchidectomy has inadvertently occurred and the proximal
spermatic cord is histologically free of tumour the tumour remains Stage 1 if
other staging investigations are negative and serum markers return to normal
for age.
If the cut end of the cord is infiltrated consider high inguinal excision of the
remainder but the tumour is at least Stage 2 and requires chemotherapy.
Hemiscrotectomy is not required.
(4) Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy is rarely necessary for non-secreting
MGCTs if there are enlarged nodes >1cm on imaging and serum markers are
normal. If markers remain elevated the nodes are assumed to contain
tumour and the tumour is at least Stage 3. There is no indication for
retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Abdominal ultrasound or CT scan and Chest X-ray with assessment of
resectability in the absence of visible metastases.
(2) The results of serum AFP/HCG should usually be available.
Operation
(1) Collect ascitic fluid or perform a peritoneal wash. Send washings/ascitic
fluid for cytology.
(2) Biopsy any enlarged para-aortic node - do not attempt lymph node
dissection.
(3) Any peritoneal or omental nodule should be biopsied.
(4) The tumour should not be aspirated - if it is the tumour is at least Stage 2.
(5) The tumour should be biopsied if it is unresectable or if the patient has
obvious Stage 3 or 4 disease. Otherwise unilateral oophorectomy should be
performed.
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Serum AFP/HCG should be available. In neonates AFP is normally elevated
by adult standards - see Appendix A - and does not necessarily indicate
malignant histology. However a baseline level is useful for follow-up.
(2) MRI is the best imaging modality for tumours at this site but CT is
acceptable. Particular attention should be given to determining whether there
is intraspinal extension of the tumour.
Operation
(1) Neonates - the majority of tumours will be mature or immature teratomas.
Complete surgical excision with coccygectomy en-bloc is required. For very
large tumours consider laparotomy and early control of the median sacral
vessels, use of aprotinin or possible cardiopulmonary bypass support -
specialist advice is recommended.
Oncological follow-up with regular measurement of serum AFP at least 2/3
monthly for 3 years is essential, as approximately 14% tumours will recur as
a malignant GCT [39].
(2) Older children - the majority of these tumours will be malignant.
If serum markers are elevated at diagnosis an initial biopsy should be
performed and delayed resection with coccygectomy should take place at the
end of chemotherapy as long as marker levels fall appropriately. Mutilating
surgery should be avoided.
If serum markers are normal at diagnosis complete surgical excision with
coccygectomy en-bloc should be attempted. Before surgery the case should
be discussed with the Chief Investigator - initial biopsy may be appropriate.
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Serum AFP/HCG should be available
(2) CT scan of chest
Operation
(1) If serum markers are unequivocally elevated (see normal range in young
children – Appendix A) and clinical situation allows, give chemotherapy
without biopsy. If there are respiratory problems with O2 requirement
chemotherapy may be modified – see Prescribing in Respiratory
Compromise (Section 8.7). Delayed resection should take place at the end of
planned chemotherapy if serum markers are falling appropriately.
(2) If markers are normal at diagnosis surgical complete excision should be
performed if possible via lateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy,
8.2.5 Vagina/Uterus
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Serum AFP/HCG should be available
(2) MRI scan of pelvis
Operation
(1) Tumours in these sites are almost invariably yolk sac histology with elevated
AFP. Biopsy only should take place at diagnosis. Following chemotherapy,
if imaging reveals a residual mass still present, examination under
anaesthetic should be performed with non-mutilating surgery if feasible. If
resection would be mutilating a biopsy and strategy of close follow-up with
serum markers is appropriate if biopsy shows no viable tumour. If viable
tumour is present discuss with Chief Investigator.
Pre-operative Investigations
(1) Serum AFP/HCG
(2) Imaging of primary site
Operation
(1) Complete excision where feasible without damage to adjacent structures.
Otherwise biopsy and delayed resection following chemotherapy if possible.
8.2.7 Relapse
Using histology, AFP level, stage, tumour site and age the patient should be allocated to one of the
three Risk Groups (see Table1).
Any patient without initial histology should be allocated a Risk Group on marker levels, site and
stage. Any patient where first AFP level is post initial surgery and < 10,000 should be allocated a
Risk Group according to site, histology and stage only.
Patients in this group have Stage 1 fully resected MGCTs confirmed by histological examination.
Most patients will have gonadal primaries. Staging investigations will have revealed no residual or
metastatic disease. Ovarian primaries with unsampled ascites are Stage 3 and pre/intraoperative
rupture are Stage 2. Testicular tumours with inadvertent initial scrotal biopsy, which are otherwise
Stage 1, can be allocated to the Low Risk group.
If serum markers subsequently rise and/or imageable tumour recurs patients should be treated
according to risk group at relapse.
Patients with rising serum markers only and no imageable disease should be treated as
Intermediate Risk.
It is important to be certain serum markers are definitely rising before starting chemotherapy,
particularly in younger children with AFP<100 where fluctuations can occur. If in doubt, discuss
with Chief Investigator.
These patients should receive a total of 4 courses of JEB at 21 day intervals. They should no
longer receive the number of courses to achieve normalisation of markers + 2.
Four courses of JEB will be sufficient to achieve ‘normal’ or ‘normal for age’ markers for levels
below approximately 900,000 kU/L at diagnosis when the rate of fall is appropriate (see Appendix
A for normal values <2yrs).
If AFP level has not quite returned to normal for age after 4 courses continue to monitor levels
weekly as it is likely they will continue to fall. If levels remain elevated, or do not fall
appropriately, discuss with Chief Investigator.
If a residual mass is present after 4 courses of JEB and marker levels are normal, second look
surgery should be considered if non-mutilating resection is thought to be possible.
This group of patients should receive a total of 6 courses of JEB at 21 day intervals. They should
no longer receive the number of courses to achieve normalisation of markers + 2.
In the unlikely situation that AFP level has not quite returned to normal for age after 4 courses
continue to monitor levels weekly as it is likely they will continue to fall. If levels remain elevated
discuss with Chief Investigator.
If a residual mass is present at the end of chemotherapy, second look surgery should be considered
if non-mutilating resection is thought to be possible.
Courses of chemotherapy will be given at 21 day intervals when neutrophils > 1 x 109/L and
platelets > 100 x 109/L.
In patients without haematological recovery at 21 days the next course should be delayed
until recovery, this will usually be less than a week.
Each course of JEB will be as follows (See Appendix D for Flow Sheet ):
Dose calculated from body weight (kg) and t1/2 (half life) of 51CrEDTA or
51
CrDTPA clearance based on the modified Calvert formula [42] – see
Tables in Appendix B. These tables give the Day 2 dose of Carboplatin in
mg calculated to give an AUC of 7.9mg/ml.min
An isotope method should be used for GFR estimation, either 51Cr EDTA or 51Cr DTPA clearance
with 3 sampling times. The half-life of isotope clearance is used to calculate the carboplatin dose
and is a more repeatable and direct measure than GFR as it does not involve the potential
inaccuracies in estimating volume of distribution. Oedema and dehydration may introduce errors in
assessing renal function.
EDTA clearance is preferred. The half life of DTPA clearance can be used and should be directly
equivalent to EDTA half life although it is important to check that the isotope formulation used by
the local Medical Physics department is designed for GFR estimation as some formulations are
protein bound and will underestimate clearance.
If there is any doubt about the accuracy of the GFR eg unexpectedly low (<60) or high (>180), the
result should be discussed with the local Medical Physics department. If the result is felt to be
unreliable carboplatin should be prescribed on surface area at 600mg/m2 and GFR reassessed prior
to the next course.
The use of creatinine clearance to calculate GFR is discouraged due to potential inaccuracies,
particularly in patients under 3 years old.
Rare patients, especially those with pelvic germ cell tumours have significant renal impairment at
presentation due to ureteric obstruction. In this situation it is still appropriate to use carboplatin but
it is essential to use GFR based prescribing. If renal impairment is sufficiently severe to require
dialysis carboplatin can still be used with pharmacokinetic AUC monitoring (discuss with Chief
Investigator).
As renal impairment enhances bleomycin pulmonary toxicity, bleomycin should be omitted and
replaced by vincristine 1.5mg/m2 (max 2mg) IV bolus on Day 3 if GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2. If
renal impairment recovers bleomycin can be reintroduced.
Occasional patients, particularly those with thoracic tumours, will have respiratory difficulty and
require O2 therapy. As there is a potential risk of enhanced bleomycin lung toxicity in patients with
respiratory problems, it is suggested that the dose of bleomycin on Day 3 is replaced by vincristine
1.5mg/m2 (max 2mg) IV bolus on Day 3 for the first course of JEB. Bleomycin should be given in
subsequent courses when the respiratory distress has resolved.
Carboplatin should be prescribed according to body weight and t1/2 EDTA clearance
according to Appendix B.
Etoposide and bleomycin doses should be adjusted according to the following guidelines:
Starting doses: For children <6 months of age 50% of calculated dose by body
surface area
For children 6 months - 1 year of age 75% of calculated dose by
body surface area
Under the age of 1 year doses can be increased (to a maximum of 100%) according to
tolerance at the treating clinician’s discretion.
Body surface area should be calculated using body weight as recommended by the
UKCCSG Chemotherapy Standardisation Group in 1998.
iii) AFP/HCG - if elevated at diagnosis monitor weekly until normal for age
iv) GFR - for Intermediate Risk Group use baseline GFR to prescribe
all 4 courses of JEB unless renal impairment secondary to
tumour is present at diagnosis. In this case recheck GFR after
1 or 2 courses as indicated.
-for High Risk Group recheck GFR after 3 courses unless
renal impairment is present, when manage as above.
v) Audiology -for High Risk Group recheck hearing after 3 courses of JEB
-for Intermediate Risk Group recheck hearing at end of
chemotherapy.
vi) Imaging -on therapy imaging is usually only indicated for patients
with non-secreting tumours, when previous sites of tumour
should be assessed after every 2 courses of JEB. Imaging is
also indicated for patients with secreting tumours if marker
levels do not fall appropriately.
ii) Imaging -at end of therapy MRI or CT of primary site and all other sites
involved at diagnosis
-for non secreting MGCTs ultrasound of primary site and CXR 3
monthly for 2 years
-for tumours with mature/immature components appropriate imaging
6 monthly
v) GFR -at end of therapy. Repeat at 1 year and 5 years if abnormal for age at
end of therapy.
vi) Audiology -at end of therapy. For patients < 5 years at end of therapy repeat
when old enough for accurate assessment.
vii) Lung Function -at end of therapy and 5 years if able to co-operate
(usually > 8 yrs old)
On the basis of the accrual rate onto GC II it is anticipated 20 patients per year would be included
in the study. In 5 years, 100 patients in all could be treated according to GC III. More patients may
be recruited from non-UKCCSG centres.
As with GC II, this would enable overall survival and event free survival rates to be estimated to
within 6% (95% confidence interval).
In order to ensure that event free survival is maintained at the level of GC II interim monitoring is
to take place for the stratified patient risk groups.
On the basis of the accrual rate onto GC II it is anticipated 10 patients per year would be included
in the low risk group of patients. In 5 years, 50 patients could be treated according to this protocol.
The protocol treatment for low risk patients is the same as before, but the relapse rate will be
monitored, with a stopping rule to prevent an excess of relapses or progressions in these patients.
The rule is based on monitoring the 12-month event rate - an event being defined as relapse,
progression or death. The observed rate in the previous study is considered to be an acceptable one.
Five interim analyses will take place at intervals when 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the
patients will potentially have 1 year of follow up. The rule is based on the Fleming multi-stage
procedure [41].
The boundaries have been set taking a 12 month event rate ≤ 25% to be acceptable and requiring a
power of 84% to detect a 12 month event rate of ≥ 40%. The α error risk i.e. the probability of
stopping the trial with a true event rate ≤ 25% is 0.10.
If 6 or fewer than 6 events are observed accrual will continue and a second analysis will be carried
out when a further 10 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 10 or more than 10 events are observed (observed
event rate 50%).
If 9 or fewer than 9 events are observed accrual will continue and a third analysis will be carried
out when a further 10 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 12 or more than 12 events are observed (observed
event rate 40%).
If 11 or fewer than 11 events are observed accrual will continue and a fourth analysis will be
carried out when a further 10 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’
follow up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 15 or more than 15 events are observed
(observed event rate 38%).
If 14 or fewer than 14 events are observed accrual will continue and a final analysis will be carried
out when the 50 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow up.
The relapse rate would be significantly higher than before if 17 or more than 17 events are
observed (observed event rate 34%).
On the basis of the accrual rate onto GC II it is anticipated 4 patients per year would be included in
the intermediate risk group of patients. In 5 years, 20 patients could be treated according to the
protocol.
The reduction in the number of courses of chemotherapy may lead to a higher relapse rate and so a
stopping rule to prevent an excess of relapses or progressions in patients entering the study will be
used. The rule, as for low risk patients, is based on monitoring the 12-month event rate. The
observed rate, or less, in the previous study is considered to be an acceptable one.
Five interim analyses will take place as before. The boundaries have been set taking a 12 month
event rate ≤ 6% to be acceptable and requiring a power of 80% to detect a 12 month event rate of ≥
26%. The α error risk i.e. the probability of stopping the trial with a true event rate ≤ 6% is 0.03.
After the first 4 patients are included in the study with a minimum of 12 months’ follow up,
analysis will be carried out. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 3 or more than 3 events are
observed (observed event rate 75%).
If 2 or fewer than 2 events are observed accrual will continue and a second analysis will be carried
out when a further 4 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 3 or more than 3 events are observed (observed event
rate 38%)
If 2 or fewer than 2 events are observed accrual will continue and a fourth analysis will be carried
out when a further 4 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 3 or more than 3 events are observed (observed event
rate 19%).
If 2 or fewer than 2 events are observed accrual will continue and a final analysis will be carried
out when the 20 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow up.
The relapse rate would be significantly higher than before if 4 or more than 4 events are observed
(observed event rate 20%).
On the basis of the accrual rate onto GC II it is anticipated 7 patients per year would be included in
the high-risk group of patients. In 5 years, 35 patients could be treated according to the protocol.
The protocol treatment for high-risk patients is similar to before, but the relapse rate will be
monitored, with a stopping rule to prevent an excess of relapses or progressions in these patients.
The rule is based on monitoring the 12-month event rate. The observed rate in the previous study is
considered to be acceptable.
The boundaries have been set taking a 12 month event rate ≤ 30% to be acceptable and requiring a
power of 84% to detect a 12 month event rate of ≥ 50%. The α error risk i.e. the probability of
stopping the trial with a true event rate ≤ 30% is 0.07
After the first 7 patients are included in the study with a minimum of 12 months’ follow up,
analysis will be carried out. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 7 events are observed
(observed event rate 100%).
If 6 or fewer than 6 events are observed accrual will continue and a second analysis will be carried
out when a further 7 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 9 or more than 9 events are observed (observed event
rate 64%).
If 8 or fewer than 8 events are observed accrual will continue and a third analysis will be carried
out when a further 7 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’ follow
up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 11 or more than 11 events are observed (observed
event rate 52%).
If 10 or fewer than 10 events are observed accrual will continue and a fourth analysis will be
carried out when a further 7 patients are included in the study and have a minimum of 12 months’
follow up. The stopping boundary will be crossed if 13 or more than 13 events are observed
(observed event rate 46%).
There is currently no defined second line chemotherapy strategy for relapsed paediatric MGCTs.
The aim of this protocol is to develop appropriate relapse chemotherapy in the context of first line
JEB chemotherapy. It is recommended that patients are treated with vinblastine, ifosfamide and
cisplatin for a total of 6 courses. It also seems to be important in relapse patients to attempt
resection of residual masses where possible [27]. With a unified chemotherapy strategy it is hoped
to learn more about the factors that contribute to successful salvage.
These recommendations do not apply to patients with MGCTs who relapse having had initial
surgery only and a ‘watch and wait’ strategy. These patients should be treated with JEB according
to their Risk Group at relapse.
2) AFP/HCG when relapse is suspected from rising serum markers care should be taken to
confirm that markers continue to rise rather than fluctuating - this is particularly true for
AFP<100 and young children. If in doubt discuss with Chief Investigator.
6) Audiometry
8) Renal tubular function using paired plasma and urine samples for phosphate and creatinine
to calculate Tmp/GFR
Patients with relapsed MGCT will be treated with courses of vinblastine, ifosfamide and cisplatin
(VeIP) given at 21 day intervals with G-CSF support at clinician’s discretion. Because this
chemotherapy is potentially ototoxic and nephrotoxic in patients who have already received JEB
the drugs will be given over 5 days to minimise toxicity. Patients will be given 6 courses of VeIP.
Chemotherapy will be given when neutrophils > 1 and platelets > 100. If haematological recovery
has not occurred delay chemotherapy until FBC is satisfactory, usually less than a week.
A double lumen central venous line is necessary for administration of this chemotherapy.
3) AFP/HCG -weekly until normal for age then pre each course of chemotherapy
7) Radiology -all sites of tumour should be imaged after 2 courses and at end of
therapy for non-secreting tumours
-if AFP/HCG are not falling as expected all sites of disease should be
imaged
-for secreting tumours with appropriately falling AFP/HCG all sites of
tumour at relapse should be imaged at end of therapy
8) Bone marrow -re-assess after 2 courses and at end of therapy if involved at relapse
13.6 Surgery
If a residual tumour mass remains at the end of chemotherapy, surgical resection should be
considered. Although it is important not to undertake surgery that will result in significant
morbidity it is possible that surgery to improve local control has an important role in relapsed
patients particularly in some sites e.g. sacrococcygeal [27].
Patients with refractory disease, i.e. failure of serum markers to fall appropriately on relapse
therapy, should be discussed with Chief Investigator – use of paclitaxel, dose intensification of
cisplatin and/or high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support may be indicated. There may also
be a role for radiotherapy in some cases.
A Serious Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose:
The significance of moderately elevated AFP levels in immature teratoma is controversial. AFP
staining can be associated with immature endodermal elements within these tumours and may not
indicate a malignant element [29]. At present it is probably reasonable to recommend that if AFP at
diagnosis is less than 1000 kU/L in a patient with immature teratoma, AFP levels should be
followed weekly until normal following surgery. This strategy includes patients with Clinical Stage
>1 although second look surgery may be necessary if imaging shows a progressing deposit or
rising AFP.
Following surgery patients should be followed closely with appropriate imaging, ideally ultrasound
3 monthly and monitoring of AFP and HCG 4-6 weekly. If tumour regrowth is detected further
resection should be attempted unless tumour markers are significantly elevated when initial JEB
chemotherapy is appropriate.
Patients with immature teratoma and AFP > 1000 at diagnosis should be treated as MGCT with
JEB chemotherapy according to their Risk Group. Patients with non germ cell malignant elements
should receive chemotherapy directed to the type of non germ cell malignancy eg Ewings
chemotherapy for PNET.
The risk of recurrence seems to be highest for sacrococcygeal tumours resected in the neonatal
period where the risk is of the order of 10-14% [39]. The recurrent tumour is generally yolk sac.
Recurrence also occurs at other sites where complete resection is difficult e.g. head and neck. The
timing of recurrence can be as late as 3 years after original resection. Recurrence can be of
teratoma locally or occasionally in draining nodes or it can be MGCT.
The Germ Cell Working Group would like to establish the natural history of mature teratoma and
the true risk of recurrence. Encouragement is given to registration of all cases of mature teratoma.
Mature teratoma requires complete surgical resection. Ideally AFP and HCG should be measured
prior to resection. If marker levels are elevated prior to surgery then the patient should be managed
and followed as MGCT even if mature teratoma is the only histology seen at resection. In neonatal
tumours in the sacrococcygeal region where AFP levels are physiologically elevated and difficult
to interpret, MGCT at presentation is extremely unlikely. For immature teratoma see Section 15.
Follow up should consist of measurement of AFP levels 6 – 8 weekly for the first year, 2 monthly
for the second year and 3 monthly for the third year. The exception to this is completely resected
gonadal mature teratomas where AFP/HCG were known to be normal prior to or immediately
following surgery. In this case early postoperative follow-up only is appropriate. Teratomas known
to be incompletely resected should be imaged every 3 months for 3 years.
If a mature teratoma recurs management should be as MGCT if markers are raised for age or
should be further resection if markers are normal.
3 Ablin A, Krailo M, Ramsay NK. Results of treatment of malignant germ cell tumours in 93
children: A report from the Children’s Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1782-
1792
7 Mann JR, Pearson D, Barrett A, et al. Results of the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer
Study Group’s malignant germ cell tumour studies. Cancer 1989; 3: 1657-1667
8 Baranzelli MC, Patte C. The French experience in paediatric malignant germ cell tumours.
In Germ Cell Tumours IV eds: WG Jones, I Appleyard, P Harnden, JK Joffe. John Libbey
& Co. Ltd, London, 1998, 219-226
9 Haas RJ, Schmidt P, Gobel U, Harms D. Testicular germ cell tumours. Results of the GPO
MAHO studies 82, 88, 92. Klin Padiatr 1995; 207: 145-150
11 Giller R, Cushing B, Lauer S, et al. Comparison of high dose or standard dose cisplatin with
etoposide and bleomycin (HDPEB vs PEB) in children with stage III and IV malignant
germ cell tumours (MGCT) at gonadal primary sites: A paediatric Intergroup trial
(POG9049/CCG8882). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 525a (abstr 2016)
12 Cushing B, Giller R, Lauer S, et al. Comparison of high dose or standard dose cisplatin with
etoposide and bleomycin (HDPEB vs PEB) in children with stage I-IV extragonadal
malignant germ cell tumours (MGCT): A paediatric Intergroup trial (POG9049/CCG8882).
Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 525a (abstr 2017)
17 Mann JR, Raafat F, Robinson K et al. The United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study
Group’s Second Germ Cell Tumour Study: Carboplatin, etoposide and bleomycin are
effective treatment for children with malignant extracranial germ cell tumours, with
acceptable toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3809-3818
18 Baranzelli MC, Kramar A, Bouffet E, et al. Prognostic factors in children with localised
malignant nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1212-1219
20 Dehner LP. Gonadal and extragonadal germ cell neoplasms: teratomas in childhood. In
Finegold MJ, Bennington J, eds. Pathology of neoplasia in children and adolescents.
Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1986: 282-312
21 Loehrer P, Nichols C, Weathers T et al. Vinblastine plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as initial
salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell tumour. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2500-2504
23 Wheeler B, Loehrer P, Williams S, et al. Ifosfamide in refractory male germ cell tumours. J
Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 28-34
29 Marina NM, Cushing B, Giller R et al. Complete surgical excision is effective treatment for
children with immature teratomas with or without malignant elements: A Paediatric
Oncology Group/Children’s Cancer Group Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2137-
2143
30 Motzer RJ, Amsterdam A, Pneto V et al. Teratoma with malignant transformation: Diverse
malignant histology arising in men with germ cell tumours. J Urol 1998; 159: 133-138
32 Robboy SJ, Scully RE. Ovarian teratoma with glial implants on the peritoneum. Hum
Pathol 1970; 1: 43-653
33 Norris HJ, Zirkin HJ, Benson WL. Immature (malignant) teratoma of the ovary: A clinical
and pathologic study of 58 cases. Cancer 1976; 37: 2359-2372
35 Nielsen SNJ, Scheithauer EW, Gaffey TA. Gliomatosis peritonei. Cancer 1985; 56: 2499-
2503
36 Boanazzi C, Peccatori F, Colombo N et al. Pure ovarian immature teratoma, a unique and
curable disease: 10 years experience of 32 prospectively treated patients. Obstet Gynecol
1994; 84: 598-604
37 Mann JR, Raafat F, Robinson K et al. Mature and immature extracranial teratomas in
children: The UK Children’s Cancer Study Group’s experience. In Germ Cell Tumours IV
eds: WG Jones, I Appleyard, P Harnden, JK Joffe. John Libbey & Co. Ltd, London, 1998,
237-246
38 Gobel U, Calaminus G, Engert J et al. Teratomas in infancy and childhood. Med Pediatr
Oncol 1998; 31: 8-15
39 Huddart SN, Mann JR, Robinson K, Raafat F, Imeson J, Gornall P, Sokal M, Gray E,
McKeever P, Oakhill A. Sacrococcygeal teratomas: the UK Children’s Cancer Study
Group’s experience. I. Neonatal. Pediatr Surg Int 2003; 19: 47-51
41 Fleming TR. One sample testing for Phase II clinical trials. Biometrics 1992; 38: 143-151
Note: AFP values in this table are in ng/ml. Most AFP values are now reported in kU/L. To
convert ng/ml to kU/L multiply by 0.84. To convert kU/L to ng/ml multiply by 1.2.
The tables on the following two pages give the dose of carboplatin in mgs to be administered on
Day 2 of JEB chemotherapy. The dose is calculated using the patient’s weight in kg and the t1/2
(mins) of the EDTA GFR by the following formula [42]:
Dose(mg) = AUC (mg/ml.min) x { [ 0.693 / t ½ (min)] x [ 0.52 x ( 843 x body weight (kg)0.891)] +
( 0.36 x body weight (kg)) }
GENERAL PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA Grade 0 Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV
Lansky or Karnofsky > 90 - 100 90 to > 70 70 to > 50 50 to > 30 < 30
WHO Scale Capable of all normal activities Capable of light activities except Ambulant and capable of self-care Capable of some personal Confined totally to a bed or chair,
all laborious physical activities but incapable of all other activities but confined to a bed or incapable of all activities, even
activities. Not resting or sitting chair more than 50% of waking essential activities such as eating
more than 50% of waking hours hours
BODY WEIGHT
(Loss or gain from baseline) < 5.0 % 5.0 - 9.9% 10.0 - 19.9% > 20% -
HEMATOLOGICAL
TOXICITY Grade 0 Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV
WBC x10 9 /l >4.0 3.0 - 3.9 2.0 - 2.9 1.0 - 1.9 < 1.0
Granulocytes / Neutrophils: > 2.0 1.5 - 1.9 1.0 - 1.4 0.5 - 0.9 < 0.5
x10 9 /l
Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) WNL >ULN - <1.5 x ULN >1.5 - <2 x ULN >2 x ULN -
Prothrombin time (PT) WNL >ULN -<1.5 x ULN >1.5 - <2 x ULN >2 x ULN -
Fibrinogen WNL > 0.75 - < 1.0 x LLN >0.5 - < 0.75 x LLN >0.25 - < 0.5 x LLN <0.25 x LLN
For leukemia studies or bone <20% decrease from pretreatment >20 - <40% decrease from
marrow infiltrative/ value or LLN pretreatment value or LLN
myelophthisic process, if >40 - <70% decrease from <50 mg
specified in the protocol. pretreatment value or LLN
WNL
Disseminated Intravascular Absent - - Laboratory findings present with Laboratory findings and bleeding
Coagulation (DIC) no bleeding
Also consider Platelets.
Note: Must have increased fibrin split products or D-dimer in order to grade as DIC.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy Absent - - Laboratory findings present Laboratory findings and clinical
(e.g., thrombotic without clinical consequences consequences, (e.g., CNS
thrombocytopenic purpura/TTP hemorrhage/ bleeding or
or hemolytic uremic thrombosis/ embolism or renal
syndrome/HUS) failure) requiring therapeutic
intervention
Note: Must have microangiopathic changes on blood smear (e.g., schistocytes, helmet cells, red cell fragments)
CARDIAC
(DYS) Rhythm None Asymptomatic, transient, Symptomatic, but requiring no Symptomatic and requires Life threatening
requiring no therapy therapy treatment
(E.g. arrhythmia associated with
CHF, hypotension, syncope,
shock)
Cardiac Left Ventricular Function No change Asymptomatic, decline of resting Asymptomatic, decline of resting Mild CHF responsive to therapy Severe or refractory CHF
LVEF < 20% of baseline LVEF > 20% of baseline (congestive heart failure)
Cardiac Echography: Normal >25% to ≤ 30% >20% to ≤ 25% > 15% to ≤ 20% ≤ 15 %
Fractional Shortening
Mild CHF responsive to therapy Severe or refractory CHF
(congestive heart failure)
Cardiac Ischaemia None Non specific T- wave flattening or Asymptomatic, ST and T - wave Angina without evidence for Acute myocardial infarction
changes. changes suggesting ischaemia infarction.
Pericardial Effusion / Pericarditis None Asymptomatic, effusion, no Pericarditis (rub, chest pain, ECG Symptomatic effusion, drainage Tamponade; drainage urgently
intervention required changes) required required
Hypotension None or No change Changes requiring no Requiring brief fluid replacement Requiring therapy and sustained Shock
therapy(including transient or other therapy but not medical attention, but resolves (associated with acidemia and
orthostatic hypotension) hospitalisation: no physiological without persisting physiological impairing vital organ function due
consequences consequences to tissue hypoperfusion)
Hypertension* None or no change Asymptomatic, transient increase Recurrent/persistent increase > Requires therapy or more Hypertensive crisis
> 95th percentile of ULN 95th percentile of ULN intensive therapy than previously
Not requiring treatment
* For paediatric patients use age & sex appropriate normal values to give >95th percentile of Upper Normal Limit (ULN)
Acute Vascular Leak Syndrome Absent - Symptomatic, but not requiring Respiratory compromise, Life threatening; requiring pressor
fluid support. or requiring fluids. support and/or ventilatory support.
CONSTITUTIONAL SYMPTOMS
Fatigue None Increased fatigue over baseline, Moderate (e.g., decrease in Severe (e.g., decrease in Bedridden or disabling
(lethargy, malaise, asthenia) but not altering normal activities performance status by 1 performance status by > 2 ECOG
Note: See page 1 for performance WHO/ECOG level or 20% levels or 40% Karnofsky or
status scales. Karnofsky or Lansky) or causing Lansky) or loss of ability to
difficulty performing some perform some activities
activities
Rigors, chills None Mild, requiring symptomatic Severe and/or prolonged, Not responsive to narcotic -
treatment (e.g., blanket) requiring narcotic medication medication
or non- narcotic medication
INFECTIONS / FEVER
Fever in absence of infection None 38.0 – 39.0 oC 39.1 – 40.0 oC > 40.0 oC for < 24 hours > 40.0 oC for > 24 hours
or with hypotension
Injection site reaction None Pain or itching or erythema Pain or swelling, with Ulceration or necrosis that is -
inflammation or phlebitis severe or prolonged, or requiring
surgery
Rash / Desquamation None or no change Scattered macular or papular Scattered macular or papular Generalized symptomatic macular, Generalised exfoliative or
eruption or erythema: eruption with pruritus or other papular or vesicular eruption ulcerative dermatitis
asymptomatic. associated symptoms covering
less than 50% of body surface. Or desquamation covering > 50%
of body surface.
Or localised desquamation or
other lesions covering < 50% of
body surface.
Erythema Multiforme Absent - Scattered, but not generalized Severe or requiring IV fluids (e.g., Life-threatening (e.g., exfoliative
(e.g.,Stevens-Johnson syndrome, eruption generalized rash or painful or ulcerating dermatitis or
Toxic epidermal necrolysis) stomatitis) requiring enteral or parenteral
nutritional support)
GASTROINTESTINAL
Stomatitis None Painless ulcers, erythema, Painful erythema, oedema, or Painful erythema, oedema, or Requires parenteral or enteral
or mild soreness ulcers, but can eat or swallow ulcers requiring IV hydration. support or prophylactic intubation
Nausea None Able to eat reasonable intake Intake significantly decreased No significant intake, -
but can eat requiring IV fluids.
Vomiting None 1 episode in 24 hours 2 - 5 episodes in 24hrs > 6 episodes in 24 hrs; or need for Requires parenteral nutrition; or
IV fluids physiologic consequences
requiring intensive care: or
haemodynamic collapse.
Diarrhoea None Increase <4 stools/day over Increase 4 - 6 stools/day or Increase ≥7 stools/day or Physiologic consequences
pre-treatment nocturnal stools. incontinence or need for requiring intensive care: or
parenteral support for dehydration haemodynamic collapse.
Anorexia None Loss of appetite Oral intake significantly Requiring IV fluids Requiring feeding tube or
decreased parenteral nutrition
Colitis None - Abdominal pain with mucus Abdominal pain, fever, change in Perforation or requiring surgery or
and/or blood in stool bowel habits with ileus or toxic megacolon
peritoneal signs, and radiographic
or biopsy documentation
Constipation – see also None Requiring stool softener or dietary Requiring laxatives Intractable constipation requiring Obstruction or toxic megacolon
NEUROLOGICAL modification manual evacuation or enema
Ileus (or neuroconstipation)
HEPATIC
Bilirubin WNL < 1.5 x ULN 1.6 to 3.0 x ULN 3.1 to 10.0 x ULN > 10.0 x ULN
Transaminase WNL ≤ 2.5 x ULN 2.6 to 5.0 x ULN 5.1 to 20.0 x ULN > 20.0 x ULN
SGOT/SGPT, ALT/AST
Alkaline phosphatase WNL ≤ 2.5 x ULN 2.6 to 5.0 x ULN 5.1 to 20.0 x ULN > 20.0 x ULN
PULMONARY
Cough Absent Mild, relieved by non-prescription Requiring narcotic antitussive Severe cough or coughing spasms, -
medication poorly controlled or unresponsive
to treatment.
Pulmonary Function, Dyspnoea None or no change Asymptomatic, abnormal PFT’s Dyspnoea on significant exertion Dyspnoea at normal level of Dyspnoea at rest
activity
PA 02 – change from pre- > 90% >75 - <90% >50 - <75% >25 - <50% <25%
treatment normal value
Carbon Monoxide Diffusion 100 - 75% 74 - 65% 64 - 55% 54 - 40% < 40%
Capacity (DLCO)
Vital Capacity (VC) 100 - 75% 74 - 65% 64 - 55% 54 - 40% < 40%
Haematuria Negative Microscopic only Intermittent gross bleeding, no Persistent gross bleeding or clots. Open surgery or necrosis or deep
clots May require catheterisation or bladder ulceration.
instrumentation, or transfusion
Serum Creatinine WNL < 1.5 x N 1.5 - 3.0 x N 3.1 - 6.0 x N > 6.0 x N
Note: adjust to age-appropriate
levels for paediatric patients
Tubular Toxicity (Overall*) Increase of 2 microglobulin and Decrease of phosphate Debre de Toni-Franconi Prolonged (≥ 5 years) or definitive
or lysozyme in urine. Mild reabsorption (TRP 75 - 85%) Syndrome, Hypophosphataemic substitution required, or
None hyperamino-aciduria (HAA) glucosuria < 10 mol /l. Moderate rickets, tetany. Hyperchloraemic progressive renal failure
HAA metabolic acidosis, polyuria,
Note: not listed in CTC Criteria
dehydration
Distal Tubular Toxicity ≥ 600 or normal response to 500 - 599 400 - 449 No symptom BUT 300 - 399 with Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus or
Early morning urine osmolality DDAVP no response to DDAVP
< 300 with no response to
EMUO - (mOsm/kg) DDAVP
Note: not listed in CTC Criteria
* For more details concerning tubular and glomerular toxicity after drugs such as ifosfamide or platinum compounds a separate precise grading of nephrotoxicity should be used as described by SKINNER et al.
(J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jan;11(1):173-90)
BLOOD ELECTROLYTES
Hypernatremia WNL >ULN - 150 >150 - 155 >155 - 160 > 160
(High Sodium, Na+) mmol /l
Hyperkalemia WNL >ULN - 5.5 >5.5 – 6.0 >6.0 – 7.0 > 7.0
(High Potassium, K+) mmol /l
Hypercalcemia WNL >ULN – 11.5 mg/dl >11.5 – 12.5 mg/dl >12.5 – 13.5 mg/dl >13.5 mg/dl
(High Calcium, Ca++ )
>ULN – 2.9 mmol /l >2.9 – 3.1 mmol /l >3.1 – 3.4 mmol /l >3.4 mmol /l
46 GC III/Final Version1.0/September 2004
O THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATI
OLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT A
TOXICITY Grade 0 Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV
NEUROLOGICAL
Cortical None Mild somnolence or agitation, not Moderate somnolence or agitation Severe somnolence, agitation, Coma, seizures, toxic psychosis
interfering with function interfering with function, but not with confusion, disorientation or
activities of daily living hallucinations
Ataxia (incoordination) None Asymptomatic but abnormal on Mild symptoms interfering with Moderate symptoms interfering Bedridden or disabling
physical exam, not interfering with function, but not interfering with with activities of daily living
function activities of daily living
Confusion Normal Confusion or disorientation or Confusion or disorientation or attention Confusion or delirium interfering Harmful to others or self;
attention deficit of brief duration; deficit interfering with function, but with activities of daily living requiring hospitalization
resolves spontaneously with no not interfering with activities of daily
sequelae living
Irritability (children <3 years of Normal Mild; easily consolable Moderate; requiring increased attention Severe; inconsolable -
age)
Leukoencephalopathy associated None Mild increase in SAS (subarachnoid Moderate increase in SAS; and/or Severe increase in SAS; severe Severe increase in SAS; severe
radiological findings space) and/or mild ventriculomegaly; moderate ventriculomegaly; and/or ventriculomegaly; near total ventriculomegaly; diffuse low
and/or small (+/- multiple) focal T2 focal T2 hyperintensities extending white matter T2 hyperintensities attenuation with calcification
hyperintensities, involving into centrum ovale; or involving 1/3 to or diffuse low attenuation (CT); (CT); diffuse white matter
periventricular white matter or <1/3 of 2/3 of susceptible areas of cerebrum focal white matter necrosis necrosis (MRI)
susceptible areas of cerebrum (cystic)
Seizure(s) None - Seizure(s) self-limited and Seizure(s) in which Seizures of any type which are
consciousness is preserved consciousness is altered prolonged, repetitive, or difficult
to control (e.g., status epilepticus,
intractable epilepsy)
Mood No change Mild anxiety or depression Moderate anxiety or depression Severe anxiety or depression Suicidal ideation or danger to
interfering with function, but not interfering with activities of daily self.
interfering with activities of daily living
living
Sensory None or No change Mild paresthesia or loss of deep Objective sensory loss or paresthesia Sensory loss or paresthesia Permanent sensory loss that
tendon reflexes – not interfering with interfering with function, but not interfering with activities of daily interferes with function
function. interfering with activities of daily living
living
Motor None or No change Subjective weakness; no objective Mild objective weakness without Objective weakness with Paralysis
findings significant impairment impairment of function
Headache None Mild Moderate or severe but transient Unrelenting and severe -
Ileus (or neuroconstipation) None - Intermittent, not requiring intervention Requiring non-surgical Requiring surgery
intervention
Hearing None or no change Asymptomatic, hearing loss, Tinnitus Hearing loss interfering with Deafness not correctable
audiometry only function, correctable with hearing
aid
Audiometry Loss < 40 db on all Loss at least 40 db at 8000HZ Loss at least 40db at 4000HZ Loss at least 40 db at 2000 HZ Loss at least 40 db at 1000 HZ
frequencies
PAIN
Headache None Mild Moderate or severe but transient Unrelenting and severe -
FLOW SHEETS
-
-
49
RECURRENT MGCTS
JEB CHEMOTHERAPY
Week 0 1 2 3 6 9 12 15 18
STOP STOP
‘INTERMEDIATE RISK’ ‘HIGH
RISK’
Week 0 1 2 3 6 9 12 15 18
GFR * * *
(+ if clinical need)
AUDIOMETRY * * *
IMAGING - secreting * * *
- non-secreting * * * *
Drug Information
BLEOMYCIN
Alternative names
None
Mechanism of action
DNA strand cleavage via free radicals produced by activated bleomycin complexes.
DNA intercalator, resulting in base excision and strand breakage.
Adverse events
Early
Common
·Fevers (25%)
Occasional
·Skin (erythema, hyperkeratosis, peeling, pigmentation, bullae, ulceration.)
Rare
·Alopecia
·Nail Changes
·Anaphylaxis
Late
Occasional
·Pulmonary Fibrosis
Recommended routes
·Intravenous bolus or 12 hr infusion
·IM with lignocaine
·Intrapleural or intralesional
CAUTION
Dose should be reduced if renal function is impaired.
Administration
Bolus administration - inject slowly or via a fast running drip.
Intravenous administration - dilute in up to 100 mls 0.9% sodium chloride and administer slowly
Interactions
Oxygen enhances pulmonary toxicity - even years after exposure.
Cisplatin increases risk of pulmonary toxicity.
CARBOPLATIN
Alternative names
• JM8
• Paraplatin (Proprietary Name)
• CBCDA
Mechanism of action
Produces interstrand and intrastrand DNA crosslinks
Adverse effects
Common
• Nausea + vomiting
• Myelosuppression
• Persisting thrombocytopenia
Occasional
• Ototoxicity
• Raised LFT's (Alk Phos)
• Nephrotoxicity
Rare
• Neurotoxicity
• Rash
• Anaphylaxis + anaphylactoid reactions
• Ocular, transient visual disturbances
• Alopecia
Recommended routes
Intravenous
Dose/schedule
If renal function is poor, dose should be calculated according to GFR.
In some cases it may be desirable to calculate the dose to deliver a specific AUC.
Paediatric regimens aim to deliver a carboplatin AUC 6 - 10mg/ml.min.
Interactions
Co administration with potentially nephrotoxic agents should be avoided due to the risk of acute
reductions in GFR and hence decreased drug clearance.
Overdose
• Full supportive measures, including the use of growth factors should be considered.
• Carboplatin is removed by haemodialysis. Although there are no publications on its use
following overdosage, haemodialysis would be a reasonable management option.
• Dextrose 5%
• Concentration is not critical and should be adjusted to the child’s fluid requirements
• Carboplatin can be diluted as low as 500 micrograms/ml
• Hydration is not required
• Once reconstituted, carboplatin is stable for 8 hours at room temperature, or 24 hours if
refrigerated
CISPLATIN
Alternative Names:
• Cis DDP
• Cis diamminedichloro-platinum
Mechanisms of action:
• Produces interstrand and intrastrand DNA crosslinks.
Adverse Effects
Common
• Nausea/vomiting (may be delayed)
• Nephrotoxicity (dose limiting)
• Myelosuppression
• Hypokalaemia
Occasional
• Peripheral neuropathy
• Taste disturbance
Rare
• Anaphylaxis
• Other neurotoxicity
• Ototoxicity
• Ocular
CAUTION:
• Must establish adequate hydration and diuresis prior to administration
• Prolonged electrolyte losses are seen in some cases (especially magnesium & potassium)
Administration
• Hydration is necessary to ameliorate the renal damage caused by cisplatin.
• All protocols require hydration, and an adequate urine output to be established before
administration of cisplatin.
• Mannitol is also used and has advantages over frusemide (which can itself cause renal damage).
• Mannitol should be given during the cisplatin infusion, and in some cases after the infusion.
• Hydration needs to continue for at least 24 hours after the end of the cisplatin infusion
• Cisplatin should be given as a continuous infusion over 24 hours as dose rate can effect both acute
and late toxicities.
• There is some evidence to suggest that a continuous infusion may be as/or more effective with
decreased emesis.
Interactions
• Co-administration with potentially nephrotoxic agents should be avoided due to the risk of acute
reductions in GFR and hence decreased clearance, as well as additive renal toxicity.
• Concomitant administration of cisplatin and etoposide may reduce etoposide clearance.
Overdosage
• Full supportive measures should be considered
• Plasmapheresis may be of use in cisplatin overdosage
ETOPOSIDE
Alternative names
• VP16
• VEPESID
Mechanisms of action:
Acts by inhibition of Topoisomerase II which results in DNA strand breakage
Adverse Effects
Common
• Alopecia
• Myelosuppression
Occasional
• Nausea/vomiting
Rare
• Anaphylactic reactions
• Fever
• Hypotensive reactions
• Headache
• Pruritus
• Pigmentation
• Mucositis
• Second tumours
Recommended route
Intravenous
Administration
• Ampoules 100mg in 5ml
• Dilute to a concentration of 0.4mg/ml in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, give as an IV infusion
over 1 to 4 hours2. One hour infusion is recommended in order to avoid problems with “line time”
during complex chemotherapy regimens.
• Data sheet recommends administration over at least 30 minutes, to avoid hypotensive reaction
• Due to potential solubility problems care should be taken when mixing with other agents.
IFOSFAMIDE
Alternative names
• Mitoxana (Proprietary Name)
Mechanism of action
Ifosfamide is a pro-drug which is activated by microsomal enzymes, mainly in the liver, producing
a series of metabolites. The primary anti-tumour metabolite, ifosphosphoramide mustard is thought
to exert its cytotoxic effect by producing interstrand and interstrand DNA crosslinks
Common
• Renal toxicity, particularly tubular dysfunction
• Myelosuppression
• Emesis
• Alopecia
Occasional
• Liver dysfunction
• Haemorrhagic cystitis if inadequate mesna prophylaxis
Rare
• Encephalopathy
Late
• Sub-fertility/infertility
• Second malignant tumours
Recommended route
Intravenous infusion over 1 hour.
Dose/schedule
Courses given approximately 3 weeks apart to allow haematological recovery.
In order to prevent urothelial toxicity, hydration and prophylactic mesna are essential with this
drug.
Administration
Give over 1 hour. Intravenous hydration (with glucose/saline + potassium chloride 20 mmol/l.),
containing mesna at 120% ( mg/mg) of the prescribed daily ifosfamide dose. Infuse this solution at
a rate of 3L / m2 / 24 hours, commencing 3 hours before the first ifosfamide dose and continuing
for a minimum of 12 hours after completion of the last ifosfamide infusion. Recommendations are
of 24 hours post hydration.
Interactions
The concomitant use of ifosfamide with anticoagulants, especially warfarin, may result in an
increased anti-coagulant effect.
Ifosfamide metabolism may be inhibited by antifungal azole agents and nifedipine. Carbamazepine,
phenytoin and prolonged steroids may increase clearance.
Overdosage
The most serious consequences are haemorrhagic cystitis, and myelosuppression. If the overdose
is recognised early, intravenous hydration and diuresis, together with mesna may be beneficial in
ameliorating damage to the urinary tract. Methylene blue and diazepam have shown some activity
in reversing ifosfamide encephalopathy
Alternative names:
• Velbe
Mechanisms of Action
Tubulin binding agent producing mitotic arrest.
Adverse effects
Common
• Abdominal pain
• Constipation
• Leucopenia
Occasional
• Peripheral neuropathy (mild)
• Thrombocytopenia and Anaemia
Rare
• Nausea and vomiting
• Alopecia
• Paralytic ileus
Recommended routes
By bolus injection or into the tubing of a fast running intravenous infusion.
Hydration not required.
CAUTION
Vinblastine is a highly vesicant drug, and great care must be taken to avoid extravasation
Dose/schedule
Concentration for administration 1 mg/ml.
Recommended dose: 6mg/m2 no more frequently than every 7 days.
Maximum single dose: 10mg.
Interactions
Nil known
Alternative names
• Oncovin
Mechanisms of action
Tubulin binding agent producing mitotic arrest.
Adverse effects
Common
• Alopecia
• Abdominal pain - cramps
• Pain in jaw, bones and joints
• Constipation
Occasional
• Peripheral neuropathy (loss of deep tendon reflexes)
• Autonomic neuropathy (paralytic ileus, urinary retention)
Rare
• Leucopenia, Thrombocytopenia, Anaemia
• Nausea and vomiting
• Raised LFTs (mild and transient)
• Convulsions
• Diplopia and Photophobia
Recommended routes
By bolus injection or into the tubing of a fast running intravenous infusion.
Hydration not required.
CAUTION
Vincristine is a highly vesicant drug, and great care must be taken to avoid extravasation.
• Variable
• Dose reduction may be necessary if toxicity unacceptable
• The need to limit the total vincristine dose per administration to 2mg is not supported by clinical
experience in adults.
Interactions
Vincristine plasma clearance can be reduced by nifedipine, cimetidine or ranitidine, and
increased by phenobarbitone. The clinical relevance of these interactions in not clear.
Overdose
Plasmapheresis and phenobarbitone have been reported to be of value in cases of systemic vincristine
overdose.
Dilution specification
Stability
Pharmacokinetics
Vincristine is eliminated by hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion. Clearance is variable and may
be age dependent.
In adults, but not children, vincristine neurotoxicity has been related to AUC. Also in adults, impaired
liver function has been related to reduced clearance and predisposition to neurotoxicity. A dose
reduction has been recommended for patients with a raised serum bilirubin.
Your child has been diagnosed with a type of tumour known as a germ cell tumour. Your child’s
doctor will already have explained about the tumour and where it is in his/her body. It is possible
your child has already had an operation to remove the tumour.
This leaflet sets out the way it is proposed to treat your child’s germ cell tumour. Because this
treatment involves some changes from the way we have previously treated germ cell tumours in
children in the United Kingdom (UK) it is a research study. Before you decide whether to give
your consent for your child to be treated in this way you should read this leaflet and discuss it with
your child’s doctor, nurses and others. Please take your time to decide whether to give your consent
or not.
The aim of this study is to continue to reduce the amount of treatment some children with germ cell
tumours need without affecting the chance of being cured.
In the UK doctors have treated children’s germ cell tumours with surgery only or with surgery plus
chemotherapy using etoposide, carboplatin and bleomycin. Overall about 9 out of 10 children are
cured.
Germ cell tumours usually produce substances (AFP or HCG) that can be measured in the blood.
This is useful for telling how the tumour is responding to treatment. In the past we have given as
many courses of chemotherapy as it took to reduce the level of AFP or HCG to normal plus 2
additional courses. On average this was about 5-6 courses.
Analysis of the last UK germ cell tumour study shows that some germ cell tumours are more
responsive to treatment than others. In fact some tumours, usually in the ovary or testis, can be
cured with surgery without any chemotherapy at all.
We propose to decide how much treatment your child needs based on where the tumour started,
whether it has spread or not and how high the level of AFP is in the blood. For some children this
will mean no chemotherapy at all initially. Some children will receive 4 courses and some will
receive 6 courses of chemotherapy. This means some children will receive less treatment than in
the past.
The aim is to reduce the treatment as much as we can but maintain the good cure rates. To prove
this is possible will take about 5 years.
63
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
2. Why is my child being chosen?
Your child has a germ cell tumour. All children with germ cell tumours in the UK are being asked
to be part of this study.
You can decide whether your child takes part or not. You will be asked to sign a consent form
before starting treatment. You can change your mind at any time without affecting the standard of
treatment your child receives.
If you decide you do not want your child to take part your doctor will discuss alternatives. It is
likely that he/she will suggest using the same chemotherapy but the number of courses will be
decided by the time it takes the blood AFP to reduce to normal as was used in the past.
There are no extra tests or treatment involved if your child takes part in this research study. Your
child will already have had scans, blood tests and probably an operation to make the diagnosis.
Your child’s doctor will have explained about having chemotherapy and what it involves. The
study uses a different way of deciding how much treatment your child needs. For some children
this will mean they receive fewer courses of chemotherapy than in the past. The chemotherapy is
the same as has been used for germ cell tumours for some years in the UK.
Unfortunately all chemotherapy has some side effects. The 3 drugs used to treat germ cell tumours
(etoposide, carboplatin, bleomycin) will cause hair loss, some sickness and temporary decrease in
the numbers of white cells and platelets in the blood, which can make your child at risk of infection
and bruising and bleeding. In addition etoposide can cause a sore mouth. Carboplatin can cause
kidney damage and affect hearing. Your child will be checked for these side effects. In general they
are mild. Bleomycin is used in a fairly low dose but can rarely cause lung damage. Anyone at risk
of pregnancy must use effective contraception until their treatment is finished.
There is a small possibility that reducing treatment for some children might increase the risk of the
tumour recurring. Because of this risk the results of this study will be monitored closely and it will
be stopped if there is any sign of the results not being as good as in the past.
It is hoped that some children with germ cell tumours can be cured with less chemotherapy and
therefore fewer side effects. However this cannot be guaranteed. The information we get from this
study may help us to treat future patients with germ cell tumours better.
64
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
9. What if new information becomes available?
Sometimes during a research study new information becomes available about the treatment. If this
happens your child’s doctor will discuss whether your child continues in the study. If you or your
child’s doctor decide your child should be withdrawn his/her care will be continued. If your child
continues in the study you may be asked to sign a new consent form.
If taking part in this study causes harm to your child there are no special compensation
arrangements. However if your child is harmed due to someone’s negligence, then you may have
grounds for legal action but you may have to pay for this. Regardless of this, if you wish to
complain or have any concerns about the way you have been treated during this study, the normal
National Health Service complaints procedure should be available to you.
We would like your permission to collect information from your child’s medical records during the
study. All information collected will be kept strictly confidential. Information on all patients in this
study will be sent to the UKCCSG (United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group) Data Centre
in Leicester, UK where it will be kept. All the information that could be traced to your child will be
kept confidential.
When the results of the study are analysed, your child’s tumour sample will be reviewed by a panel
of pathologists. This review is for research purposes only and will not affect your child’s treatment.
When the study is complete the results will be published in medical journals. If you would like to
know when the results are available please let your doctor know. Your child will not be identified
in any publication.
The UKCCSG is organising this study. This group organises most children’s tumour treatment in
the UK. There is no payment for taking part in this research and there is no payment to the doctors
organising this study.
If you have any concerns about this study or the way it has been carried out you should contact the
local investigator (name, tel, etc) or the hospital (name) complaints department or the UKCCSG
(UKCCSG Data Centre, University of Leicester, Hearts of Oak House, 9 Princess Road West,
Leicester, LE1 6TH).
If you agree to your child taking part you will need to sign a consent form. You will be given a
copy to keep. With your permission, we will let your GP know your child is taking part in this
study.
65
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
You have been diagnosed with a type of tumour known as a germ cell tumour. Your doctor will
already have explained about the tumour and where it is in your body. It is possible you have
already had an operation to remove the tumour.
This leaflet sets out the way it is proposed to treat your germ cell tumour. Because this treatment
involves some changes from the way we have previously treated germ cell tumours in children in
the United Kingdom (UK) it is a research study. Before you decide whether to give your consent to
be treated in this way you should read this leaflet and discuss it with your parents, your doctor,
your nurse and others. Please take your time to decide whether to give your consent or not.
The aim of this study is to continue to reduce the amount of treatment some children with germ cell
tumours need without affecting the chance of being cured.
In the UK doctors have treated children’s germ cell tumours with surgery only or with surgery plus
chemotherapy using etoposide, carboplatin and bleomycin. Overall about 9 out of 10 children are
cured.
Germ cell tumours usually produce substances (AFP or HCG) that can be measured in the blood.
This is useful for telling how the tumour is responding to treatment. In the past we have given as
many courses of chemotherapy as it took to reduce the level of AFP or HCG to normal plus 2
additional courses. On average this was about 5-6 courses.
Analysis of the last UK germ cell tumour study shows that some germ cell tumours are more
responsive to treatment than others. In fact some tumours, usually in the ovary or testis, can be
cured with surgery without any chemotherapy at all.
We propose to decide how much treatment you need based on where the tumour started, whether it
has spread or not and how high the level of AFP is in the blood. For some patients this will mean
no chemotherapy at all initially. Some patients will receive 4 courses and some will receive 6
courses of chemotherapy. This means some patients will receive less treatment than in the past.
The aim is to reduce the treatment as much as we can but maintain the good cure rates. To prove
this is possible will take about 5 years.
66
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
2. Why am I being chosen?
You have a germ cell tumour. All children and young people with germ cell tumours in the UK are
being asked to be part of this study.
You can decide whether to take part or not. If you decide to take part you will be asked to sign a
consent form before starting treatment. You can change your mind at any time without affecting
the standard of treatment you receive.
If you decide you do not want to take part your doctor will discuss alternatives. It is likely that
he/she will suggest using the same chemotherapy but the number of courses will be decided by the
time it takes the blood AFP to reduce to normal as was used in the past.
There are no extra tests or treatment involved if you take part in this research study. You will
already have had scans, blood tests and probably an operation to make the diagnosis. Your doctor
will have explained about having chemotherapy and what it involves. The study uses a different
way of deciding how much treatment you need. For some patients this will mean they receive
fewer courses of chemotherapy than in the past. The chemotherapy is the same as has been used for
germ cell tumours for some years in the UK.
Unfortunately all chemotherapy has some side effects. The three drugs used to treat germ cell
tumours (etoposide, carboplatin, bleomycin) will cause hair loss, some sickness and temporary
decrease in the numbers of white cells and platelets in the blood, which can make you at risk of
infection and bruising and bleeding. In addition etoposide can cause a sore mouth. Carboplatin can
cause kidney damage and affect hearing. You will be checked for these side effects. In general they
are mild. Bleomycin is used in a fairly low dose but can rarely cause lung damage. Anyone who
might get pregnant must use contraception until their treatment is finished.
There is a small possibility that reducing treatment for some patients might increase the risk of
their tumour recurring. Because of this risk the results of this study will be monitored closely and it
will be stopped if there is any sign of the results not being as good as in the past.
It is hoped that some children with germ cell tumours can be cured with no, or less chemotherapy
and therefore fewer side effects. However this cannot be guaranteed. The information we get from
this study may help us to treat future patients with germ cell tumours better.
67
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
9. What if new information becomes available?
Sometimes during a research study new information becomes available about the treatment. If this
happens your doctor will discuss with you and your parents whether you continue in the study. If
you or your doctor decides you should be withdrawn, your care will be continued. If you continue
in the study you may be asked to sign a new consent form.
If taking part in this study causes you harm there are no special compensation arrangements.
However if you are harmed due to someone’s negligence, then you may have grounds for legal
action but your family may have to pay for this. Regardless of this, if you wish to complain or have
any concerns about the way you have been treated during this study, the normal National Health
Service complaints procedure should be available to you.
We would like your permission to collect information from your medical records during the study.
All information collected will be kept strictly confidential. Information on all patients in this study
will be sent to the UKCCSG (United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group) Data Centre in
Leicester, UK where it will be kept. All the information that could be traced to you will be kept
confidential.
When the results of the study are analysed, your tumour sample will be reviewed by a panel of
pathologists. This review is for research purposes only and will not affect your treatment.
When the study is complete the results will be published in medical journals. If you would like to
know when the results are available please let your doctor know. You will not be identified in any
publication.
The UKCCSG is organising this study. This group organises most children’s tumour treatment in
the UK. There is no payment for taking part in this research and there is no payment to the doctors
organising this study.
If you have any concerns about this study or the way it has been carried out you should contact the
local investigator (name, tel, etc) or the hospital (name) complaints department or the UKCCSG
(UKCCSG Data Centre, University of Leicester, Hearts of Oak House, 9 Princess Road West,
Leicester, LE1 6TH).
If you agree to take part you will need to sign a consent form. You will be given a copy to keep.
With your permission, we will let your GP know you are taking part in this study.
68
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
INFORMATION SHEET FOR PATIENTS 14+ YEARS (Version 2.0, January 2005)
You have been diagnosed with a type of tumour known as a germ cell tumour. Your doctor will
already have explained about the tumour and where it is in your body. It is possible you have
already had an operation to remove the tumour.
This leaflet sets out the way it is proposed to treat your germ cell tumour. Because this treatment
involves some changes from the way we have previously treated germ cell tumours in children in
the United Kingdom (UK) it is a research study. Before you decide whether to give your consent to
be treated in this way you should read this leaflet and discuss it with your mum or dad, your doctor,
your nurse and others. Please take your time to decide whether to give your consent or not.
The aim of this study is to continue to reduce the amount of treatment some children with germ cell
tumours need without affecting the chance of being cured.
In the UK doctors have treated children’s germ cell tumours with surgery only or with surgery plus
chemotherapy using etoposide, carboplatin and bleomycin. Overall about 9 out of 10 children are
cured.
Germ cell tumours usually produce substances (AFP or HCG) that can be measured in the blood.
This is useful for telling how the tumour is responding to treatment. In the past we have given as
many courses of chemotherapy as it took to reduce the level of AFP or HCG to normal plus 2
additional courses. On average this was about 5-6 courses.
Analysis of the last UK germ cell tumour study shows that some germ cell tumours are more
responsive to treatment than others. In fact some tumours, usually in the ovary or testis, can be
cured with surgery without any chemotherapy at all.
We propose to decide how much treatment you need based on where the tumour started, whether it
has spread or not and how high the level of AFP is in the blood. For some patients this will mean
no chemotherapy at all initially. Some patients will receive 4 courses and some will receive 6
courses of chemotherapy. This means some patients will receive less treatment than in the past.
The aim is to reduce the treatment as much as we can but maintain the good cure rates. To prove
this is possible will take about 5 years.
69
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
2. Why am I being chosen?
You have a germ cell tumour. All children and young people with germ cell tumours in the UK are
being asked to be part of this study.
You and your parents can decide whether to take part or not. If you decide to take part you and
your parents will be asked to sign a consent form before starting treatment. You can change your
mind at any time without affecting the standard of treatment you receive.
If you decide you do not want to take part your doctor will discuss alternatives. It is likely that
he/she will suggest using the same chemotherapy but the number of courses will be decided by the
time it takes the blood AFP to reduce to normal as was used in the past.
There are no extra tests or treatment involved if you take part in this research study. You will
already have had scans, blood tests and probably an operation to make the diagnosis. Your doctor
will have explained about having chemotherapy and what it involves. The study uses a different
way of deciding how much treatment you need. For some patients this will mean they receive
fewer courses of chemotherapy than in the past. The chemotherapy is the same as has been used for
germ cell tumours for some years in the UK.
Unfortunately all chemotherapy has some side effects. The 3 drugs used to treat germ cell tumours
(etoposide, carboplatin, bleomycin) will cause hair loss, some sickness and temporary decrease in
the numbers of white cells and platelets in the blood, which can make you at risk of infection and
bruising and bleeding. In addition etoposide can cause a sore mouth. Carboplatin can cause kidney
damage and affect hearing. You will be checked for these side effects. In general they are mild.
Bleomycin is used in a fairly low dose but can rarely cause lung damage. Anyone who might get
pregnant must use contraception until their treatment is finished.
There is a small possibility that reducing treatment for some patients might increase the chance of
their tumour recurring. Because of this risk the results of this study will be monitored closely and it
will be stopped if there is any sign of the results not being as good as in the past.
It is hoped that some children with germ cell tumours can be cured with no, or less chemotherapy
and therefore fewer side effects. However this cannot be guaranteed. The information we get from
this study may help us to treat future patients with germ cell tumours better.
70
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
9. What if new information becomes available?
Sometimes during a research study new information becomes available about the treatment. If this
happens your doctor will discuss with you and your mum or dad whether you continue in the study.
If you or your doctor decides you should be withdrawn, your care will be continued. If you
continue in the study you may be asked to sign a new consent form.
If taking part in this study causes you harm there are no special compensation arrangements.
However if you are harmed due to someone’s negligence, then you may have grounds for legal
action but your family may have to pay for this. Regardless of this, if you wish to complain or have
any concerns about the way you have been treated during this study, the normal National Health
Service complaints procedure should be available to you.
We would like your permission to collect information from your medical records during the study.
All information collected will be kept strictly confidential. Information on all patients in this study
will be sent to the UKCCSG (United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group) Data Centre in
Leicester, UK where it will be kept. All the information that could be traced to you will be kept
confidential.
When the results of the study are analysed, your tumour sample will be reviewed by a panel of
pathologists. This review is for research purposes only and will not affect your treatment.
When the study is complete the results will be published in medical journals. If you would like to
know when the results are available please let your doctor know. You will not be identified in any
publication.
The UKCCSG is organising this study. This group organises most children’s tumour treatment in
the UK. There is no payment for taking part in this research and there is no payment to the doctors
organising this study.
If you have any concerns about this study or the way it has been carried out you should contact the
local investigator (name, tel, etc) or the hospital (name) complaints department or the UKCCSG
(UKCCSG Data Centre, University of Leicester, Hearts of Oak House, 9 Princess Road West,
Leicester, LE1 6TH).
If you agree to take part you and your parents will need to sign a consent form. You will be given a
copy to keep. With your permission, we will let your GP know you are taking part in this study.
71
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
Your doctor has found out that you have a kind of tumour (lump) called a germ cell tumour. Your
doctor will tell you about the tumour and where it is in your body. You might already have had an
operation to take out the tumour.
This leaflet is to help you understand how we would like to treat your germ cell tumour. Because
this treatment is a bit different from the way we used to treat germ cell tumours in children in the
United Kingdom (UK) it is called a research study. In this study doctors are trying to find ways to
make the treatment for germ cell tumours better but they need your mum or dad’s permission to do
this. Before you all decide whether to give your permission for you to be treated in this way, you
should read this leaflet and discuss it with your mum or dad, your doctor and your nurse. Take your
time to decide whether to give your permission or not.
Most people with germ cell tumours need some medicines called chemotherapy as well as an
operation to get better. We are pretty good at getting children with germ cell tumours better. We
think we might be able pick out some children who don’t need as much chemotherapy to get better
as we used to give. In fact some germ cell tumours can be treated without any chemotherapy at all.
We will decide how much treatment you need from where the tumour is in your body and from the
results of a special blood test. For some children this will mean no chemotherapy at all at first.
Some children will get 4 doses of chemotherapy and some will get 6 doses.
The aim is to reduce the treatment as much as we can but still make people better. To prove this is
possible will take about 5 years.
You have a germ cell tumour. All children who get germ cell tumours in the UK are being asked to
be part of this study.
You and your parents can decide if you should be treated this way. If you decide to take part your
parents will be asked to sign a consent form before starting treatment. You can change your mind
at any time, it will not change the way we look after you.
72
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
4. What other treatment could I have?
If you decide you do not want to take part your doctor will use another way of deciding how much
chemotherapy you need to make you better.
There are no extra tests or treatment if you take part in this study. You will already have had scans,
blood tests and probably an operation. Your doctor will have explained about having chemotherapy
and what it is like. The study uses a new way of deciding how much treatment you need. For some
children this will mean they get less chemotherapy than in the past. The chemotherapy is the same
drugs we have used to treat germ cell tumours for quite a long time.
Unfortunately all chemotherapy does some things we don’t want it to do. The medicines used to
treat germ cell tumours will make you lose your hair (it will come back again when the treatment is
finished), you might feel sick and you might get infections and bruises. Your doctor will give you
treatment to make you better if these things happen.
It is possible that giving less chemotherapy might not get as many people with germ cell tumours
better. If this seems to be happening the study will be stopped.
We hope that some children with germ cell tumours get better with no, or less chemotherapy and
therefore fewer side effects. However we don’t know this yet. The information we get from this
study may help us to treat children with your type of tumour better in the future.
Sometimes while we are doing a study we learn new things about the treatment. If this happens
your doctor will discuss with you and your mum or dad whether you stay in the study. If your mum
or dad or your doctor decides you should stop being in the study, they will decide what treatment
you should get then. If you stay in the study your mum or dad may be asked to sign a new consent
form.
We would like your permission to collect information from your medical notes while you are on
the study. All information collected will be kept secret from anyone not working on this study.
When the results of the study are worked out, your tumour sample will be looked at again by a
panel of pathology doctors. This is for the study only and will not change your treatment.
73
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
11. What will happen to the results of this study?
When the study is finished the results will be written about in medical journals. If you would like
to know the results when they are available please let your doctor know. Your name will not be in
any report.
If you have any concerns about this study or the way it has been carried out you should contact the
local investigator (name, tel, etc) or the hospital (name) complaints department or the UKCCSG
(UKCCSG Data Centre, University of Leicester, Hearts of Oak House, 9 Princess Road West,
Leicester, LE1 6TH).
If you agree to take part your parents will be asked to sign a consent form. You will be given a
copy to keep. With your permission, we will let your GP know you are taking part in this study.
74
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
Your doctor has found out that you are poorly because you have a lump (tumour).
Your doctor will tell you about the lump and where it is in your body. You might
already have had an operation to take out the lump.
Most children with your kind of lump need to have some special medicines called
chemotherapy as well as an operation to make them better. Your doctor will tell you
more about chemotherapy. Chemotherapy medicines are strong medicines and
sometimes they make you feel poorly before they make you well again. If this
happens your doctor will give you some other medicines to make you feel better.
Your doctor will explain to your mum or dad about a new way of deciding exactly how
much chemotherapy you need. If your mum or dad says yes we will use this new way
to decide about your medicines.
We want to find the best way of knowing how much chemotherapy to give children
with your kind of lump to make them better. Your mum or dad will decide if you can
help us learn this.
75
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
Your patient (insert name) has been diagnosed with a germ cell tumour. You will receive a separate
letter about the site and stage of the tumour.
This information sheet is about a research study that has been discussed with your patient and their
family.
In the UK children’s germ cell tumours are treated with chemotherapy using etoposide, carboplatin
and bleomycin. In other countries cisplatin is substituted for carboplatin. Analysis of the results of
treatment in the UK has shown the chance of curing children’s germ cell tumours using carboplatin
to be comparable to the chance of being cured when cisplatin is used. Overall about 9 out of 10
children are cured. Carboplatin has fewer side effects than cisplatin, particularly nephrotoxicity and
ototoxicity.
Most childhood germ cell tumours secrete AFP or HCG. In the past we have given as many courses
of chemotherapy as it took to reduce the level of AFP or HCG to normal plus 2 additional courses.
This was usually about 5-6 courses. When cisplatin is used most patients require 4-6 courses.
Analysis of the last UK germ cell tumour study defined ‘risk groups’ based on site of origin of the
tumour, AFP level at diagnosis and stage. We propose to use these risk groups to determine the
amount of chemotherapy given. For some children this will mean no chemotherapy at all initially.
Some children will receive 4 courses and some will receive 6 courses of chemotherapy. This is a
small change from the way we have treated children’s germ cell tumours in the UK for over 10
years.
The aim is to reduce the treatment as much as we can but maintain the good cure rates. We
anticipate the study will run for about 5 years.
All children with germ cell tumours in the UK are being approached about taking part in the study.
76
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
3. Does my patient have to take part?
Your patient and their family will decide whether to give consent or not. They will be asked to sign
a consent form before starting treatment. They can withdraw at any time without affecting the
standard of treatment they will receive.
If your patient/their family decide they do not want to take part it is likely that they will be offered
treatment using the same chemotherapy but the number of courses will be decided by the time it
takes the blood AFP to reduce to normal as was used in the past.
There are no extra tests or treatment involved if your patient takes part in this research study. Your
patient will already have had scans, blood tests and probably an operation to make the diagnosis.
Their consultant will explain about having chemotherapy and what it involves. Your patient will be
allocated a ‘risk group’ based on diagnostic features of their tumour and this will determine the
amount of chemotherapy given. For some children this will mean they receive fewer courses of
chemotherapy than in the past.
Unfortunately all chemotherapy has some side effects. The drugs used to treat germ cell tumours
(etoposide, carboplatin, bleomycin) will cause hair loss, nausea and myelosuppression with
associated risk of infection and bruising and bleeding. In addition etoposide can cause a sore
mouth. Carboplatin can cause nephrotoxicity and affect hearing. These side effects will be
monitored. In general they are mild. Bleomycin is used in a fairly low dose but can rarely cause
lung damage. Any patient at risk of pregnancy should use effective contraception.
There is a small possibility that reducing treatment for some children might increase the chance of
relapse. Because of this risk the results of this study will be monitored closely and it will be
stopped if there is any sign of survival being reduced.
It is hoped that some children with germ cell tumours can be cured with no, or less chemotherapy
and therefore fewer side effects. However this cannot be guaranteed. The information we get from
this study may help us to treat future patients with germ cell tumours better.
Sometimes during a research study new information becomes available about the treatment. If this
happens we will discuss whether your patient continues in the study. If your patient, their family or
their consultant decide your patient should be withdrawn his/her care will be continued. If your
patient continues in the study they/their parents may be asked to sign a new consent form.
77
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
10. What if something goes wrong?
If taking part in this study causes harm to your patient there are no special compensation
arrangements. However if your patient is harmed due to someone’s negligence, then the family
may have grounds for legal action but they may have to pay for this. Regardless of this, if they
wish to complain or have any concerns about the way they have been treated during this study, the
normal National Health Service complaints procedure should be available to them.
We will obtain permission to collect information from your patient’s medical records during the
study. All information collected will be kept strictly confidential. Information on all patients in this
study will be sent to the UKCCSG (United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group) Data Centre
in Leicester, UK where it will be kept. All the information that could be traced to your patient will
be kept confidential.
When the results of the study are analysed, your patient’s tumour sample will be reviewed by a
panel of pathologists. This review is for research purposes only and will not affect your patient’s
treatment.
When the study is complete the results will be published in medical journals. If you would like to
know when the results are available please let us know. Your patient will not be identified in any
publication.
The UKCCSG is organising this study. This group organises most children’s tumour treatment in
the UK. There is no payment for taking part in this research and there is no payment to the doctors
organising this study.
If you have any concerns about this study or the way it has been carried out you should contact the
local investigator (name,tel, etc) or the UKCCSG (UKCCSG Data Centre, University of Leicester,
Hearts of Oak House, 9 Princess Road West, Leicester, LE1 6TH).
78
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
Centre Number:
Study Number:
Patient Identification Number for this trial:
Title of Project: Protocol for the treatment of Extracranial Germ Cell Tumours in children
and adolescents (GC 2005 04)
Name of Researcher:
79
PLEASE REFER TO THE CCLG WEBPAGE FOR LATEST VERSION OR TO THE DATA CENTRE BEFORE TREATING PATIENTS.
CCLG CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY. EXPIRES END JULY 2007. MAY BE SUBJECT TO AMENDMENT AT ANY TIME.
To be printed on hospital headed paper
Centre Number:
Study Number:
Patient Identification Number for this trial:
Title of Project: Protocol for the treatment of Extracranial Germ Cell Tumours in children
and adolescents (GC 2005 04)
Name of Researcher:
80