Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
23
NOW INTO COURT, through undersigned counsel, comes Defendant Jeff Landry, in his
official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, who files a motion in limine related
to potential witnesses that were former Information Technology (IT) employees that were
terminated from the Department of Justice, including but not limited to Etienne Carriere and
Rindus Pittman, and any documents produced or introduced by Plaintiff, originating from or
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Quash Subpoenas"1) for the reasons discussed below:
1. The Plaintiff was late in disclosing Etienne Carriere and Rindus Pittman as witnesses.
These individuals were not disclosed until December of 2018, well after the trial date
for this matter had been set and leaving no time for depositions or discovery related to
these witnesses.
2. Any emails produced by the Plaintiff or introduced as an exhibit by the Plaintiff that
were printed out by Etienne Carriere or former IT employees, such as the Exhibit A to
A former IT employee cannot waive a privilege that belongs to the Attorney General
or the Department of Justice. This office has reason to believe that doct1111�J}ts were
3. IT employees execute confidentiality agreements that prohibit them from talking about
matters they work on at the Attorney General's office. For example, Mr. Caniere
work he performed during the course of this litigation or by printing out documents and
1
Defendant's maintain the position that the Plaintiff has no right to file a supplemental memorandum in opposition to
a motion to quash without seeking leave of court. This pleading is improper and should be stricken from the record.