Commissioning of Two 50,000 MT Ammonia Storage

Tanks
This paper will discuss in briefQAFCO's ammonia storage systems, selection of the unique tank
design (steel tank surrounded by a fill/height concrete wall) and in detail the commissioning process
of the two recently installed anhydrous ammonia storage tanks from planning to commissioning and
handover o/the tanks to production.

Iftikhar Hussain Turi

Qatar Fertilizer Company, Mesaieed Qatar

Introduction
torage tanks are an integral part of the

S industrial landscape. In Urea fertilizer

plants surplus ammonia is stored in large
cryogenic storage tanks at -33°C (-28 OF) as it is
the most cost effecti ve method of ammonia
storage.
Figure J. Single or double waif tank with concrete wall
Selection of ammonia storage tank design can
and sand support
be: a l:hallenge due: to the hi gh cost and the
potential of hazards (release of large quantity of
ammonia) associated with storing a high volume
of toxic material. While selecting the new tank
des ign, QAFCO adopted a Risk Based
Approach (REA) and set up a task force team to
come up with the safest design. The most
common design alternatives were evaluated,
single containment (single wall) with dike (Fig-
I) double containment (double wall) with full Figure 2. Double containment with filII dyke concrete
dike concrete wall (Fig-2) and single wall
containment with full dike concrete wall (Fig-
3). It was concluded that new storage tanks
should have a single wa ll surrounded by an
independent self-supporting concrete outer
protection wall (Fig-3) capable to withstand
external impact of blast. The unique design was
the best fit for QAFCO's requirement to choose
the safest design while keeping in mind the Figure 3. Single containment wilhfull dyke concrete wall
space constraint in QAFCO because selecting
first option will take much more space
compared to the third option.

2015 61 AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL

 QAFCO ammonia storage facility
Qatar Ferti lizer Company (QAFCO) located in
the industrial town of Mesaieed is operating six
ammonia and six urea plants. Its average annual
production is about 3.8 million tons of anunonia
and 5.6 million tons of urea making QAFCO
world's largest single site producer of ammonia
and urea. In QAFCO surplus ammonia is stored
in four refrigerated storage tanks to be used
internally to make Urea and the rest is sh ipped
to externa l consumers for further processing.
With the increase in production capacity
QAFCO onsite anhydrous ammonia storage
capacity has also increased gradually by adding
more tanks. The fi rst anhydrous ammonia
storage tank (T 120 I) was constructed in 1972 to
store excess anhydrous ammonia produced by
QAFCO- I ammonia plant. The storage capacity
of thi s tank was about 20,000 metric tons of
ammonia with an interna l design pressure of 0.8
psig. The tank was a re fri gerated single wall
with suspended deck des ign. The second
anhydrous ammonia storage tank (T 1202) was
constructed in 1977 as a part of QAFCO-2
expansion. The storage capacity of this tank was
about 28,000 metric tons of anhydrous ammoni a
with an internal design pressure of 0.8 psig. This
tank was also refrigerated single wall with
suspended deck design. These two tanks were
decommissioned and demolished later after
installing bigger tanks due business requirement
and safety iss ues (single wa ll vs double wa ll
tank design). The third ammonia storage tank
(T600 I) was constructed in 1997 as a part of
QAFCO-3 expansion project to store surplus
ammonia produced by ammonia -3 plants. The
storage capacity of this tank is 20,000 metric
tons of liq uid ammonia at atmospheric pressure.
The fourth ammonia storage tank was
constructed as a part of QAFCO-4 expansion
proj ect in 2004. This tank when built was the
second largest ammonia storage tank in the
World, with storage capacity of 45000 metric
tons. Both the storage tanks are of double wall
suspended deck design elevated on piles for air
circulation.
AMMON IA TECHNICAL MANUAL
Before QAFCO-5 expansion, the company had
two refrigerated ammonia tanks with a
combined capacity of 65000 tons to store
surplus ammonia. Recently, the storage capacity
in QAFCO has increased to 165000 tons by
adding two new storage tanks T6003 (Tank 3) &
T6004 (Tank 4) having a storage capacity of
50000 metri c tons each. This gives QAFCO the
flexibility to keep all the urea plants in service
depending on the avai labili ty of carbon dioxide
produced by the a mmoni a plants even when any
of the ammonia pl ant goes down.
The new tanks are of single wall design
surrounded by a full height independ ent
concrete outer protection wall. The inner shells
of the tanks are fu ll integrity, self-supporting,
and open top with suspended decks with dome
roofs. To avoid freezing of the tanks foundation,
the tanks are elevated on piles for air
circ ulation. These two tanks are the biggest in
the world.
Tank design selection
In order to select the location and safest ta nk
des ign a team was nominated to study the pros
and cons of different tank design a nd
recommend the most suitable scenario by taking
into consideration the environmental impact,
operation safety, external risk facto rs (blast over
pressure waves), stress corrosion cracking . tank
over pressuri zation and tank inspection without
decommissioning. For the Quantitative Risk
Analysis (QRA) study on ly three tank des igns
i.e., single wall w ith independent concrete wall
and double integrity tank with low and hi gh
bund wall were taken into consideration. After
considering the pros and cons of the three
designs, a single wa ll tank with independent
concrete wall was recommended, because it was
concluded that it could withstand the impact of
debris from expl os ions in nearby facilities. As
the outer wall wi ll not be linked to the inner
pressure shell , hence the outer wall will not
sustain damage in case of inner shell damage
due to sudden pressure increase caused by
ingress of warm ammoni a. Also, there are
62 2015
 inspection possibilities with ultra-sonic
equipment on inner tank due to access to the
annu lar space. Also, it will occupy less plot
space compared to double integrity tank with
low bund, since no bund is required.
Location selection, emission
calculation, physical effect and
individual risk
To select the location of the tank the prevailing
wind direction were taken into consideration by
using emission calculations and individual risk
curves. (Appendix A. Fig- l1 &12) For each different
tank option a gas dispersion calculation were
done for the case of instant collapse of inner
tank. The total area for evaporation from a bund
is the total surface area in contact with liquid,
except inner tank. Two types of bund walls i-e
low bund with the surface area of 107 10 m 2 and
high bund wall surface area of 255 m2 were
simulated. Emission calcu lations were
performed by YARA international wi th the help
of TNO the Netherlands with the following
conditions:
Weather stability E, temperature 20 degrees C
and 80% relative humidity and alternative
temperature 50°C (122°F) (and 30% relative
humidity. From the probability of wind
direction in the different directions a risk
contour map can be constructed for each tank
type at the distance affected LCd50 in the case
of total sudden collapse of inner tank for
ex isting case with two double integrity tanks
with low bund wall and the new cases high bund
wall.
For emission scenarios blast explosions curves
that are based on 1O-4/yr probabili ty explosion
cases were used and for tank damage scenario a
normal standard case of rupture equivalent to 50
mm diameter and 5 minutes release of inventory
was considered. For each configuration
instantaneous released amount of 60,000 tons of
liquefied ammonia was considered. For
dispersion study and consequence calcul ations
2015
and modelling the following configurations
were used.
Single wa ll with low bund wall (100 x 100m)
(bund height ~ 7.5 m)
Single wall with concrete bund wall (A = 2500
m')
Double integrity tank, without bund (concrete
wall)
Sin gle wa ll tank, with concrete wall (A ~ 2500
m 2) and sand/gravel support.
For physical effect calculations the following
were considered.
Temperature: -33.43 °C (-28. 17°F) @ atm
Pasqual stabi li ty class (atmospheric turbulence):
E;
Wind speed: 3 mls at 10m height
Ambient conditions (summer / winter) 20 & 50
°C (68 &122°F)
Capacity / tank inventory: 60,000 metric tons
Dimensions: H: 36 m, D : 54 m. Distance to a
concentration of 4500 mg/m' (5929 ppm)
Distance to a concentration of 300 mg/m3
(395ppm) Distance to a concentration of 30
mg/m 3 (39 ppm). (Appendix B.Fig-13&14)
Based on the team feedback it was decided to
build two 50,000 mc:LTit: Lons ~Loragc: tanks dose
to the sea. The tanks should be built as per API
620 APP. R. Each tank should have an
independent pre-stressed reinforced concrete
outer wall to minimize the consequence in case
of inner tank leak or rupture. As in this case the
secondary containment cannot be lost if the
inner tank collapse due to pressure increase, the
emission of ammonia gas will be limited
compared to other scenarios.
Construction of new tanks
After awarding the contract to CB&I the
construction work for both the tanks started on
Marc h 2008 and completed in October 20 I O.
It took about 41 months to complete the proj ect.
Construction was done in parallel for the both
the tanks. The civil work including erection of
concrete piles and external co ncrete wall s and
roof fixing took about 20 months to complete.
The roof was li fted pneumatically, welded to the
63 AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL
 shell and tanks were preserved with nitrogen.
Tanks commissioning activities lasted for about
30 days including air nitrogen exchange,
nitrogen-ammonia exchange, and tanks cool
down. The total commissioning period including
refrigeration system (BOG) and utilities was
three and half months. About 100,000 m3 of
nitrogen was used in the process of nitrogen
purging.
All the phases of the project from construction,
pre-commissioning and commissioning were
carried out without any lost time accident.
Figure 5. Construction of tank I side walls.
Figure 6. Tank I and 2 after completion 0/ constrllction
AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL
Tanks specifications and general
description
Capacity (each) 50,000 mt
Gross Capacity 80,500 m'
Dimension (ID/H) 50 m /40.5 m
Design Pressure -0.6 /15 Kpa (g)
(-0.08/ 2.17 psi)
Operating pressure 2.5 / 4.0 Kpa (g)
(0.36/ 0.58 psi)
Operating temp; -33 ' C (-28' F)
Design code API 620 App. R
Both the tanks are single wall (carbon steel)
with outer pre-stressed concrete wall. The inner
metallic tank containing the liquid ammonia has
suspended insulating cover deck and made of
steel suitable for the design temperature. The
outer wall is designed to contain the entire
liquid ammonia in case of leakage from the
inner tank. The space between inner tank and
outer container is. around 15m. The foundations
of the tanks are on piles approximately 75 feet
deep and have about 250 piles per tank.
Figure 7. Tank/oundation piles.
Commissioning approach
Planning
The construction activItIes for both the tanks
were planned in two phases. In the first phase
tank T6003 (Tank I) and T6004 (Tank2) were
constructed, hydro tested, cleaned and preserved
under N2 atmosphere by reducing the oxygen
content below 4% in the tanks. In the second
phase associated piping, transfer pumps and
64 2015
 BOG equipment (set of three, shared by both the with respect to the chances to develop stress
tanks) were installed and commissioned. Afte r corrosion cracking, all the steps of the
commissioning and testing all the required commissioning phase including purging with
equipment including the ammonia flare, it was nitrogen, tank cooling and charging ammonia
decided to purge tank (T6004) with vapor were fo llowed diligently without any deviation
ammonia to replace nitrogen and finally to cool from the pre defined procedures.
down the tank by charging liquid ammonia.
The same procedure was fo llowed for tank Hydro test and fina l inspection
(T6003).
After successful completion of all the civil and
Major constr uction activities timeline mechanical work, both the tanks were cleaned,
inspected and prepared for hydro testing. The
Site handover May 08, 2008 tanks were filled up to 70% with desalinated
TK I pi ling completed April 26, 2009 water and after hydro test the tanks were drained
and made ready for fina l inspection. The hydro
TK 2 piling completed April 29, 2009
test was conducted only for the inner tanks.
TK I foundation completed May 27, 2009
TK 2 foundation completed June 24, 2009 F un ctional test a nd commissioning
TK I concrete wall completed Dec 19,2009
TK 2 concrete wall completed Feb 11 ,2010 Before starting next step all the accessories
including safety valves, isolation valves, BOG
TK I shell erection completed Feb 11,20 10
system, flare system and control system were
TK 2 shell erection completed Mar 16,20 10 tested and made ready to be taken in service.
TK I roof air raise Marl I, 20 10
TK 2 roof air raise Apri l 03, 2010 Air - nitroge n exchange
TK I hydro-test completed June 14,2010
The first step after completion of the mechanical
TK 2 hydro-test completed June 24, 2010
and civi l work to prepare the storage tanks for
TK I mechanical completion Oct2 1,20 10 receiving ammonia was to replace air with inert
TK 2 mechanical completion Oct2 1,20 10 media (nitrogen) and isolate the tank from
outside by installi ng man ways covers, and
Commissioning team installing all the relief valves, level indication
system and other instrumentations.
A commissioning team compnsmg of vendor Nitrogen purging for both the tanks were
representative and QAFCO was fonned for conducted by connecting tanks with the nitrogen
close co-ordination and execution of all the tankers through vaporizers. Nitrogen was
activities as per vendor guidelines and QAFCO injected at the bottom of the tank through the
standard operating procedures and guide lines. outlet nozzle and vented at the high elevations
Doc uments preparation and r eview from the top of the tank by providing exhaust
stacks on the purge ports to divert the inert to a
All the documents including commissioning safe location. A sample port was provided at the
procedures (nitrogen purging, replacing nitrogen top of the tanks to collect samples.
with ammonia and step by step cool down of the Air-nitrogen exchange for tanks T6003 started
tanks, BOG system testing) recei ved from on October 09, 2010 using liquid nitrogen
vendor were reviewed and at the same time tanker and comp leted on October 15, 20 I 0 by
operating procedures were created and bringing down the oxygen content to below 4%
discussed with vendor. As the tank in the tank. Air-nitrogen exchange for tank
commissioning is considered a critical phase T6004 started on April 22, 20 I I using the same

2015 65 AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL

 setup and completed on April 28, 2011 by
bringing down the oxygen content to below 4%
in the tank.
----- ---'---------
-
/,
Figure 8. Nitrogen purging: up flow.
Nitrogen - ammonia exchange
To reduce the chances of stress corrosion
cracking oxygen content in the tanks was further
reduced to <0.2 % by injecting ammonia vapor
at the bottom of the tank through a temporary
hose connected to the outlet flange. The vapors
coll ected from the top of the tanks were diverted
to flare.
Step-I: Introduction of ammonia vapor
By using ammonia vaporizer vapor anunonia
was introduced to tank from the top through a
12 inch inlet nozzle to create a piston effect by
pushing down nitrogen. Ammonia vapors were
taken out from the bottom nozzle and diverted
to flare through temporary line connected at the
bottom nozzle (Figure 9). Purging with
ammonia vapor continued till the ammonia
content in the ex it line reached up to 95%. This
further reduced oxygen content in the tank to
<0.2 %. On June 15, 20 II nitrogen - ammonia
vapor exchange for T6004 was initiated by
taking ammonia from one of the existing storage
tanks through export line. Nitrogen - ammonia
vapor exchange for tank-2 was completed on
June 30, 20 II. The same type of temporary
connection was made for tank-I for nitrogen-
ammonia vapor exchange by getting ammonia
from the existing tanks. Nitrogen-ammonia
AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL
vapor exchange for T6003 started on July 0 I,
2011 and was completed on July 09, 20 1L
To Flare
Figure 9. Ammonia vapor purging: down flow.
Tanks cool down
Step-2: Introduction ofliquid ammonia
The next step was tank cool down. This step is
very critical compared to the previous steps.
Extreme vigilance and care was taken to cool
down the tanks slowly to prevent stresses. It was
accomplished by directing liquid ammonia into
the storage tank through a three inch cool down
line connected at the top of the tank. A splash
plate was provided to disperse liquid ammonia
inside the storage tank for even cooling.
Ammonia vapor was taken out through a twe lve
inch nozzle on the tank top and was routed to
the compressor system and the flare. Ammonia
cool down flow was controlled to maintain the
cool down rate of 1 °c per hour. Tank cool
down continued till the liquid ammonia level
started to appear in the tank and stopped when
the level reached to about 50 mm (2 inch).
- To BOG
( II
Figure JO.Liquid ammonia introduction.
66 2015
 Tank 6004 cooling down Operation
Tank T6004 cool down with ammonia started After successful commissioning of the new
on July 01 , 2011. Cooling down of the tank was storage tanks, all the four tanks are integrated
completed on July 08, 2011 with some through interconnecting piping having a
intcmlptions in between due to ammonia provision of leve l transfer among the tanks and
shipment as the same line is used for export. a fa cility of sending product ammonia to any
Tank cool down was stopped after getting level urea plant and for export when required. All the
in the tank. The total cool down duration was four tanks, BOG system and export system are
about 8 days including the interruptions. being operated from the same DCS panel.
(Appendix C F-15)
Conclusion
Tank 6003 cooling down
During tank cool down oxygen content must be
The same procedure was followed for tank
brought down to acceptable level « 2.0%) to
T6003 cool down. It took about five days to
eliminate the chances of stress corrosion
complete the cool down process. Cool down
cracking and cool down should be closely
started on July 10, 20 t I and completed on July
monitored and controlled to maintain the
14, 2011 by injecting liquid ammonia from the
required (I °Clhr) temperature drop. Care should
top through three inch line equipped with the
be taken during inert purging to prevent
splash plate. Tank cool down was stopped after
personnel access to locations where the
getting level in the tank. (Appendix C. F-16)
atmosphere may be oxygen deficient as purging
Safety consideration invo lves a replacement of oxygen inside the
One of the significant safety hazards, during tank. This can be done by providing exhaust
tank commissioning is the purging operation stacks on all the purge nozzles to diverted gases
which in volves the replacement of oxygen to a safe locati on. During samplin g oxygen
inside the tank by nitrogen venting. To mitigate meter should be used for on time warning.
the ri sk of creating an oxygen deficient
environment, exhaust stacks on both the tanks
were provided to divert the inert to a safe height
away from personnel working in the area. Also
oxygen meters were provided during sample
collection. As a best practice American Gas
Association procedure " Purging Principal and
Practices" was adopted. This proced ure provides
instructions specific to purging tanks with inert
gas.

2015 67 AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL

 Appendix-A: Individua l risk and em ission calc ulation.

Ca l c u l ation I ndi v id u a l Ris k '0<

Ex i sti ng 2
S i ngl e VVa l! ,
Oou bl e d ouble
S i ng l e VVa l! Sing l e VV a ll High Bund.
I ntegrity i n t e gri ty VVi nd
Lo"", Bund H i gh Bun d Incl ud e "",a ll
N o Qu n d ta n ks "",i t;h O i rec::t: i o n
h ea t; capacity
LO VV Bund
SOO~ 200~ 87000 en 800~ 800~
2.00E - OS 2.00E - OS 2.00E - 09 2.00E - 09 4-.00E - 09 1
3.33E - OS 3.32E - OS 3.32E-09 3.32E-09 6.6SE - 09 2
3.02E - OS 3.02E-OS 3.02E-09 3.02E-09 6.04E - 09 3
6.0SE - OS G.OSE - OS G.OSE- 09 6.0SE - 09 1 . 2 1 E - OB 4
1. 23E-07 1. 23E-07 1. 23E OS .1. 23E 08 2. 4 SE-OS 5
S.48E- OB S.4BE - OB S.4BE- 09 S.4BE - 09 1.10E - OB 6
S.30E - OS S.30E-OS S.30E-09 S.30E-09 1 .06E - OS 7
3.43E - OS 3. 43E - OS 3.43E - 09 3. 4 3E-09 6.S7E - 09 8
3. 1 3E-OB 3. 1 3E - OB 3. 1 3E - 09 3. 1 3E-09 6.2SE - 09 9
2.G9E - OB 2.G9E - OB 2.G9E - 09 2.G9E - 09 S.3 BE - 09 10
2.3SE- OS 2.37E - OS 2.37E- 09 2.37E-09 4-.7SE - 09 11
9.37E - 09 9.37E - 09 9.37E - 09 9.37E - OG 9.37E- 10 12

Figurell. Individual risk calculations. The Weather number 1 - 12 refers to direction starting with I or 12 as north. 3 as
east. 6 as south. 9 as west.

Di" .. <. to ~ 500 Dn ..... t.. ~500 1);.1...0 t.. 300 Dn l . ... t.. lOO Di. I.o<.. 10 J() Di" •• <. to J(j
A..o .. , or A.. _ i.

a "~ R eln>ed
(PTOb.bilil)-)
.. ~-.3 «:>0<. ..~-.3 «:>0<.
/'oil3 _ 5929 pp .. /'iH3 _ 5929 pp ..
_V-.3 COlt< •
/'iHJ - )'5pp"
..10'-.3 «HIC _al-.3 c...c. ..10'-.3 co.c .
/'iH3 - 3'5pp_ /'iHJ _ l9.5 pp .. :""HJ - 39.S_

_., ,·01 (I) , .... (1) ,.0/(1) , .... (1) , 0/ (1) , 0/ (1)

, ,,.. .
SiII ...... DTook Lo .. S . ....
800 .. (20 ' 0 ,~ . 5lOO .. (20 · 0 ~OO. ll lOO .. (20 ' C) 26200 ..
10000 .. 2; ( I ~ 10"')". )
"00. ",...
_., 1200 .... (so'O 7000 .... (SO' 0 U200 ....
100 ~ 100 .. t.e;p. 8.8 .. 711111 kcI-
S;",10 or do ......... 0 ....
•00. "'" .
,
_
9600 .. (20 ' C)
<ella, bud .... u . (\330 .. ' , 200 .. (20 ' C) llOO .. (10 ' C) 20800 ..
(I ~ lO"'y.. 0' I ·IO·'ly.)
.
Botl_ . US .. 2: U".t. 36
~ 9n 8 kJl• ...,
.,
400 .... (50' C) 1200. 3100 .... (50' C)

>100000 _
(\700 . 13600 .... (50·
C)
27700 •

, Do.hle ",.eviI). ...... 0••

(I ~ 10.1.)".)
87000 .. ( 20 ' C)
87000 _
(20 ' C) >100000 ..
>11MKKlO ..
>100000_

_.,
bo .... O .. 12!1OOO .. (50' 0 12!1OOO .. >100000 .. >100000 ..
82700...,• ..,

Do.hle "'tetril)· .... k cloo .. ['·'pOnti<>o i. SEA ,,~.

• .0SEAW.... (I ~ iO.7f,T)
,,~. > 100000 .. >11MKKlO .. >100000 .. :> 100000 ..

, .-n.
Sio,1e or do.ble -nl Tao\<
Co.crele <oU.. bood i-
_.,
J1300 1<&/;""

( I ~ 10·6"',.,. or l ·lO·?ry...)
2800 .. ( 20 ' 0 Is.wo .. (20 · 0
6~ .. (lO · C)
20800 ..
87200 .... (311' 27700 ..
... d I"',·el "won , 6506 ..: : 3900 ... (SO' C) 21100 .. (311' C)
~9n 8 kJl... C)
J(i .. H.... kl

Figure J2. EmiSSIOn calclilatlOn wah the/ollowmg condlllons:

(I) without insulation, (2) with insulation. Weather stability E, temperatlwe 20 degrees C and 8()'J4 relative humidity and
alternative temperature 50 degrees C and 3()'J/o relative humidity.

AMMON IA TEC HNI CAL MANUAL 68 2015

 Appendix-B: Individual Risk Curves

Figure J 3. Individual Risk Curves for existing Figure 14. Individual Risk Curves/or existing ammonia
ammonia tanks plus Case 1 (Double integrity tank tanks plus Case 2 (Single Wall Tank with reinforced
with low concrete bUild) with location option 3 high concrete Wall) with location option 4

2015 69 AMMONIA TECHNICAL MANUAL

 Appendix-C: Tanks cool down DeS printout
1<1 Jul 11 06:2 8 :4 2

GRO UP 395 T6083 ENRFlF TEMP PAGE 1 96 HOUR S

-m1"1~~~

L__=:~:·-~~~J
75~ ~
21634
".2TT.0 25
50 -= -~

J.OJ •9. o. 72
•• 8 7/14/ 11 06:21 : 55 HR

i83fTTsm i!3,TTSe ~!~rTTSe

Q Q ~

UH TTse i!~'TT8CI U3~TTse

~

:ill] C C C c c c
R-FiX IS

-rrn
96 HOURS HM HM HM HM
10.

75

10<12TT6 0 58
)6 35

0L-__
25
________
•n:D 96 84
Figure J5. Tallkl Cool do wn DCS prill/OUI
~

72 60 48 36
~~~

07 / 14 / 1 1 06 : 27 : 55 HR

~7 Jul 11 18:59:2 2

GROUP 396 T6004 EHRAF TEMP PAGE 2

1 ••
20 MIN
75
1 HOUR

2 HOUR "25
0 HOUR
o
MORE 01 1 07/11 18:59 : 13 HR

rn
IR AXIS
ill~l'··
c
ill'!'·' i!l~.'··
c c

100 I .0 HOURS
"' HM HM
"'
75 -s
~
50

25

• .0 . 2 3. 3. 2. 10 97/07 / 1110:5 9 :1 3 HR

Figure 16. Tonk 2 Cool down DCS prill/Olll.

AMMON IA TECHNICAL MANUAL 70 2015