Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Printed from
The court said that there is no co-relation between depression and the
cause of death and hence LIC could not have repudiated claims made by kin of the deceased on the ground that he was
severely depressed.
The case involved a family of one Hetalkumar Patel from Nadiad. He died of heart attack in 2012. Two years before his death,
he had bought nine different policies from LIC.
Hetalkumar Patel’s family members claimed insurance money and the LIC repudiated the claims saying that Patel was being
treated for depression and he had not declared his ailment while opting for insurance.
For seven claims, the family members successfully approached the district consumer dispute redressal forum in Nadiad. But for
two policies, which involved amount higher than Rs 20 lakh each, Patel's widow Dr Nilam Patel, two children and his parents
knocked at the commission. LIC also challenged the lower court’s orders.
LIC placed medical literature showing how damaging major depressive disorder could prove. Patel’s advocate argued that
there is no connection between depression and heart attack. He cited various orders passed by the Supreme Court and the
National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to show that insurance companies were directed to pay claims in
case of deaths in which cause of death and the pre-existing ailments had no nexus. The court said, “It is very clear that the
husband of the original complainant was suffering from major depression and he died due to heart attack. Thus, it cannot be
said that there is any nexus between the ailment and the cause of death.”
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/gujarat-court-junks-insurance-companys-claim-that-depression-caused-heart-attack/articleshowprint/67813705.cms 2/2