Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Foreword………….…………………………………. 2
Introduction…………………………………………… 4
Conclusion……………………………………………….
60
1
Foreword
All praises are due to God alone, and may His peace and
salutations be upon all His prophets.
3
Introduction
4
1. The Jesus and Mary Magdalene issue
Brown’s view
Muslim Response
1
Page 329
2
Chapter 55, page 311
5
daily.3 Similarly, from a Christian perspective also, no
historian writings can streamline the writing of the Bible
because according to the Christian, the Bible is the word
of God. Therefore, one cannot compare divine records
with historical records, unless however, if the so-called
‘divine records’ have a reputation of being tampered with,
causing its pure divine nature to be lost, then only will it
become equal to historical proofs which are based on
opinions.
3
In Islam Qur’anic teachings cannot be compromised due to scientific recordings,
though they scarcely contradict the Qur’anic teachings. In places where they
contradict, it points out to the inaccuracy of scientific theories, which later
becomes rectified by the so called ‘new theories’.
6
married. Similarly, there are no records that Jesus didn’t
marry. We Muslims are therefore silent on matters where
the Qur’an is silent. Hereunder is however only a critical
analysis of the Da Vinci Code since it establishes such a
view.
4
This is in itself a different subject which I would not want to pursue in this
booklet.
7
Thirdly, if so much of information got exposed, even to the
extent that the ‘daughter of Mary Magdalene and Jesus’
was named Sarah, and that they were honoured amongst
the Jews in France because of this holy bloodline, which
was linked to their Prophets David and Solomon, then why
is there not a single historical record in France nor in the
world that this matter did take place?5
Brown further proves the marriage of Jesus and Marry
Magdalene with reference to the Dead Sea scrolls and the
Nag Hamaadi documents. He quotes from the names of the
above documents only, without giving specific references
or quotations from them.
5
Chapter 60, page 342
6
Or ‘B.C.’
7
Or ‘A.D.’
8
Dan Brown makes further reference to these documents
without quoting from them, whereas in the very same
paragraph, he quotes from the gospel of Phillip that Jesus
used to kiss Mary on her mouth, thus concluding that they
were married8. From the word ‘companion’ in the phrase
of the Gospel of Phillip which states ‘And the companion
of the saviour is Mary Magdalene’, he tries to prove their
marriage. Brown proves from the word ‘companion’ that
in the Aramaic language according to the Aramaic
scholars, it refers to ‘spouse’. Therefore they were married.
Brown’s Proof: 2
Muslim response
Why would the Church want to hide such a fact in fear that
it would reveal the earthly nature of Jesus, because the
Church itself readily accepts every aspect of Jesus as being
earthly, in spite of him also being God? For example, the
8
Chapter 58, page 331
9
Church accepts that Jesus ate, drank, slept, and so on,
exactly as any other earthly persons do. Therefore, why
should the Church hide one earthly fact about Jesus’
marriage, whilst accepting his other hundred earthly
qualities? This is nothing, but an assumption against the
Church.
9
Referring to direct communication with God because direct inspiration according
to Islam is only possessed by the prophets of God like Jesus, Moses, Muhammad
David, Jacob, Abraham and other prophets. Non prophets may receive indirect
inspirations as from dreams etc., but their inspirations cannot serve as a proof for
the establishment of a religious doctrine. Like the Christians claim that the New
Testament writers to receive inspiration.
10
Chapter 60, page 340
11
As he quotes in his interview.
10
2. The Divinity of Jesus
Brown says No
Muslims say No
Dan Brown spells it out very clearly, that prior to the year
325 CE (‘A.D.’); Jesus was regarded as a prophet. At
several places in his book, this subject, Brown reinforces
the fact that Jesus was a mortal. In another place, he states
that Jesus was a man and not the son of God12. From the
Islamic point of view, Brown is one hundred percent
correct. Nonetheless, in the mind of a Christian, this
statement gives rise to an important question that; if
assuming that the statement was true, then how was it
possible that after the year 325 CE a great majority of
Christians deviated from the original teachings of Jesus? In
response to this question one has to first understand the
background of Christian history.
12
Chapter 60, page 342
11
In order for you as the reader to understand this, you will
need to firstly understand the background of Christian
history, then only will it be possible to view this whole
scenario as a complete puzzle put together.
The truth is that the war in 325 CE had been amongst the
Christians themselves, which was concerning the true
identity of Jesus. It is also clearly understood from the
‘gospel selection issue’ that during the 325 period, there
13
Chapter 55, page 313
14
Page 313; ‘The Bible today as we know was collated by the pagan Roman
emperor Constantine the Great.
12
had definitely been some tension amongst the Christians
themselves concerning some issue, from which the eighty
gospels that existed were being disputed.15 In view of all
these explanations, where then does the question of war
between the pagans and the Christians arise? Secondly, for
what reason would the Christians want to dispute with the
pagans? There is obviously no reason.
15
The figure according to Dan Brown. According to another record, more than a
270 versions were burnt, other records show more.
16
It is not our general practice to prove anything through history, as I said history
bears no proof for the establishment of religious doctrines. Hence, my approach is
generally purely Biblical, which I have not really included in the publication,
especially that Brown himself has not touched on it. Since Brown has written on
History, and our purpose here is concerning the Da Vinci Code, we also therefore
concentrated our discussion around the history.
13
The reality of the controversy that existed during the year
325, occurred between two17 major groups of Christians
from amongst the many other groups, one of whom we
would term as the Unitarians, and the other as the
Trinitarians. The Unitarians were those who accepted God
as the ONE and only God as proclaimed by Jesus in the
first commandment18 of the Bible;19 and Jesus as a great
man, a prophet of God. In other words, they accepted God
and Jesus as two different entities.
15
This meeting was to settle the differences by passing a
judgment on either one of the sides. All that Constantine
was interested in doing was creating peace in his kingdom
and nothing else. In doing so, he had to see on which
version of Christianity judgement should be passed on.
Judgment was to be done by Constantine himself, who was
a pagan, not even the judgment of any Bishop or learned
cleric was accepted. Constantine’s judgment was not based
on determining whose view was most authentic, rather
which would blend in the best under his rule.
The belief that suited the pagan concept of God the most
was the Trinitarian concept. Therefore the decision was
passed in favour of the Trinitarians. This was followed by
a widespread massacre of those who did not sign the
Trinitarian creed. According to Brown, eighty other New
Testament Bibles supporting Unitarianism were burnt.
According to other reports, approximately three hundred
16
were burnt. Anyone possessing an unauthorized Bible was
facing himself to capital punishment. As from that time
onwards, pagan concepts of religion have become
integrated into Trinitarian Christianity, thus making it drift
further away from the original teachings of Jesus.
According to Brown, as well as from research, it was
found that as from that time onwards Christianity had
undergone the following changes:-
17
the Trinitarians spread into Europe. At about 246 years
later, Prophet Muhammad came to revive the message of
the first commandment preached by Moses and by Jesus
concerning the belief in the ONE God. The Unitarians saw
the commonality between Muhammad’s message with
Jesus’ message,21 also recognizing him as the prophet
prophesized by Jesus. Thus they embraced his message,
the message of Islam. That is why North African people
today are mostly Muslims. I therefore conclude saying that
the Unitarian Christians, who were once a sect of
‘Christianity’22 are today disguised under the name of
Islam. In simpler terms, I would claim that ‘the true
followers of Jesus in the past are the Muslims of today’.
21
The Unitarians affirmed Jesus as a Prophet, so do the Muslims.
22
The phrase ‘Christianity’ used here for the followers of Jesus is done more for
convenience purposes. Rather, the true followers of Jesus were not at all called by
the name ‘Christian’. The term Christian began only to be used only in Antioch
years later. “And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch” Acts 11:26
18
passed down through the generations and preserved by
word of mouth and written down as historical record.
23
Chapter 55, page 316
24
Chapter 55 Page 317
19
it because, the very mere fact the Christians are comparing
their present Bibles with the ancient manuscripts, thus
engaging themselves in deletion, addition & alterations of
the present Bibles is in itself a proof of keenness in the
establishment of the truth from falsehood. In doing so, they
produce different translations as they call them, despite
them running away from the word ‘version’, which in
actual fact are versions.25
Brown says: -
25
I say this for one simple reason. If a new version states that a certain verse from
the older one did not exist in the ancient manuscripts, it now becomes a different
version. Like two reporters on an accident scene, both reporting the exact same
event, except one saying that the driver’s indicators were on and the other reporter
saying that the indicators were not on. Both the reporters, though they may be
writing the exact same statement, with the difference of one word will be termed
as versions. Similarly, if the one Bible like the King James version quotes the
verse from 1 John 5:7, and the Revised Standard Version omits it saying that it did
not exist in the ancient manuscripts. This clearly shows that they are two different
versions or two different sides of the story.
20
has evolved through countless translations, additions and
revisions. History has never had a definite version of the
Book.’26
26
Chapter 55 Page 312
27
Chapter 55 Page 313
28
Chapter 55 Page 313
29
Chapter 55 Page 316
21
Muslim Response
Jesus said:-
“The first is, Hear O Israel: ‘The Lord our God, the Lord is
one’.
30
Chapter 6:Verse 72
22
Bible issue is also a lengthy subject, which I don’t intend
to pursue here in much detail.
31
Chapte2: Verse 79 “Then woe to those who write the Book with their own
hands, and then say: ‘This is from Allah,’ to traffic with it for miserable price!
Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.”
23
No Muslim is permitted to pass any mockery or
derogatory remarks on the Bible because this would
then be considered as personal grudge following
guess work. Besides, it is also a sin, and is not
permitted in Islam, like those who mocked at
Prophet Muhammad in displaying him in a cartoon.
Therefore, the fact that Muslims are saying that our beliefs
are in conformity with the original teachings of Jesus,
should not be surprising to anyone because Christian
records also bears testimony to this fact.32 The mere talk of
32
Chapter 60 Page 343
24
the ‘Q’ documents shows the existence of another side to
the story.
25
by way of an example; Tom secured his gold coins in a
brown safe. When the thieves tried to steal the gold coins,
they failed, however they damaged the safe. Tom however
removed the gold coins and placed it into a grey safe. Tom
has always appreciated the brown safe. He acknowledges
the long service he got out of it, but accepts the fact that he
cannot any longer derive any benefit from it since it has
been tampered with.
26
2. If the trinity was what Jesus preached, then why
didn’t Jesus clarify this in the first commandment of
Mark 12:29, instead he first preached the oneness of
God.
33
John 5:37- “You have never heard his voice at any time nor seen His Face”.
34
The word ‘man’ in the following quotation; ‘And call no man your
Father…’ also includes Jesus because in many places in the Bible
Jesus is referred to as man.
27
7. If Jesus is God himself, why did he pray for help?
Does God pray? Then, why didn’t he help himself or
pray to himself?35
35
Why did he pray; ‘Eli Eli…..’ (Matthew 27:46)
28
be the son of God, and how can God have a
genealogy?36
36
In Mathew, after the long list of forefathers, Chapter 16 reads “And Jacob begat
Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ”. It
seems as if this is the genealogy of Jesus through Joseph. If it is so, then what’s so
miraculous about his birth and what makes him the son of God? If he is the son of
both, God and Joseph, then how can he have two Fathers? If Jesus is God, then
how can he have human lineage, as it supposed to be a spiritual lineage?
29
‘ambition’, and not in ‘person’. Furthermore, if
Jesus and God are taken as one person, then how
would one interpret the verse where Jesus says; ‘My
father is greater than I’, considering that the
Christian says that the three in the trinity are in total
agreement with each other, whereas here there is a
disagreement in the quality of greatness between
Jesus and God.
37
These are just brief point-form extracts from verses of the Qur’an and traditional
recordings of Muhammad.
30
He will judge by means of the Qur’an.
He will return as a leader of the Muslims.
He himself came to fulfil or confirm the
teachings of Moses, and not to preach a new
religion.
When he returns, he will break the cross and kill
all pigs. He will also kill the one-eyed Dajjaal
(Anti-Christ)
‘My hope in writing this novel was that the story would
serve as a catalyst and a spring board for people to discuss
the important topics of faith’.38
38
NH Radio interview
31
at war with science’. Clear cut science is contradicted by
religion.
Muslim Response
32
their experiences with the Holy Spirit, which they claim to
feel all the time.
39
a. Demands you to ponder on it- ‘Do they not ponder over the Qur’an, or do you
have locks on your hearts’. (Chapter 47: Verse 24)
b. Ponder over its freedom from contradiction- ‘Do they not ponder over the
Qur’an, had it been from anyone besides God, they would surely have found
therein many contradictions’. (Chapter 4: Verse 82)
c. Challenge to produce the likeness of it- ‘And if you are in doubt as to what We
have revealed from time to time to Our servant (Muhammad), then produce a
chapter like thereof; and call your witnesses or helpers, (if there are any) besides
God, if your (doubts) are true’. (Chapter 2: Verse 23)
33
4.2 Brown’s hope on religion
Muslim Response
Muslim Response
41
Rhyming with the words of Brown on his interview statement, that God is ‘God
of the gaps’.
35
difficult to differentiate between innovations and true
ritualistic practices. In Brown’s list of ritualistic
innovations he has also included fasting to be one of them,
as he feels that it punishes the body by depriving it of food.
I therefore wish to show the significance of fasting
according to the religion of Islam.
Fasting in Islam42
42
By fasting, according to Islam it means; to abstain from eating, drinking and co-
habitation with one’s spouse42 from sunrise to sunset. Fasting in Islam, which is
ordained once a year for 30 days in the Holy month of Ramadhaan, allows a
person’s evil desires to be controlled.
43
Qur’an
36
has commanded to man, God has also ordained for man a
system of fasting, like charity, pilgrimage, prayer etc.
37
4.4 Brown question’s natural disasters
Muslim Response
38
Science and religion in Islam
44
Referring to even Muslim historians, let alone others. Even the sayings of great
saints cannot streamline the divine recordings.
45
Word by word from God
46
If archaeological and scientific discoveries happens to coincide with the
Qur’anic teachings, then well and good. If they don’t coincide, the teachings of the
Qur’an can never be forsaken for the sake of science, though they hardly
contradict the Qur’anic teachings. In places where there is a contradiction, it
would point to the inaccuracy of scientific theories, which later become ratified by
the so called ‘new theories’.
39
contradictory aspect goes between science and religion, I
would like to correct Brown by saying that contradiction is
not between science and religion in general. Instead it is
between ‘Christianity’ and science. Due to Brown’s
thorough study of Christian history, he has discovered
many innovations and uncomprehendable doctrines in the
Christian faith. One of which is the assumed birthday of
Jesus that is the 25th of December. This date was taken
from the Roman sun-god called Mithras. He also found
many other ancient gods birthdays to fall on the 25th
December. Due to all this, he therefore questions ‘religion’
in general concluding that religion has always evolved
throughout history. In doing so, he is putting all his eggs in
one basket. Less does he realize that this stigma should
only be attached to Christianity, it should not be
generalized for all religions, despite Brown’s thorough
knowledge of Christianity. Also, his lack of Islamic
knowledge leaves much to be desired of him. Generalizing
‘religion’ can drive many people towards atheism,
especially when he says that ‘I don’t claim to say that I
have all the answers, rather I am only getting people to
start thinking’, and hence questioning faith.
40
Science and Islam
“Do the disbelievers not observe that the heavens and the
earth were a single mass, then We (God) split them
apart”? Qur’an 21:30
2. Astronomy
“The sun runs on its course to its fixed place (solar apex).
This is an estimation of The Almighty, All Knowing”.
Qur’an 36:38
3. Medicine
Honey
4. Botany
Previously humans did not know that plants also have male
and female gender distinctions. Botany now states that
every plant has male and female species. Even the plants
42
that are unisexual have distinct elements of both, male and
female.
6. Geology
Mountains
47
The Geological Concept of mountains in the Qur’an, El-Naggar, pg. 5
43
having deep roots” was introduced only in 1865 by the
Astronomer Royal, Sir George Airy.48
7. Oceanography
48
Earth, Press and Siever, pg. 435 (authored by Professor Emeritus Frank Press, who was
the adviser to former US President Jimmy Carter, and the President of National Academy of
Sciences, Washington DC.
49
Principles of Oceanography, Davis pg. 92,93
44
less dense characteristics. Although there are large waves,
strong currents, and tides in the ocean, yet they do not mix
or transgress this barrier. Hence the Qur’anic verse reads:
“He has set free the two seas meeting together. There is a
barrier between them. They do not transgress”.
Qur’an 55:19-20
8. Oceanography
45
“(The parable of the disbelievers is) like zones of darkness
in an abysmal sea overwhelmed by a wave above which
there is another wave above which is a cloud”. Zones of
darkness, one above the other. If man stretches out his
hand, he will scarcely be able to see it.’ Qur’an 24:40
9. General Science
10. Embryology
46
gum’ and thereafter confirmed that the two resemble each
other in appearance. This is the exact meaning of the term
‘Mudhgah’ in Arabic. It was found that the foetus in the
early stage was similar in appearance to a ‘chewed’
substance. The somites at the back of the embryo
resembled the teeth marks of the chewed gum.
11. Geography
Have you not seen how God makes the clouds move gently,
then joins them together, then makes them into a stack, and
then you see the rain come out of it ….” Qur’an 24:43
47
12. Astronomy
48
...Continuation of Brown’s Live Interview
4.5 Brown’s statement on evolution
Muslim response
50
completely turned. Today the concrete data point strongly
in the direction of the God hypothesis.’50
51
the atheists reaction to the Big Bang Theory appeared in
the 1980’s by John Madocks the editor of ‘nature’, which
is one of the best known materialistic scientific magazines.
In the article entitled ‘down with the Big Bang’ Madocks
wrote that the Big Bang is philosophically unacceptable
because creationist and those with similar persuasions
draw ample justifications from the doctrine of the Big
Bang. He also predicted that the Big Bang was unlikely to
survive the decade ahead. The Big Bang evidence has
since grown stronger, and many more discoveries confirm
the creation of the universe. The conclusion arrived at by
modern astronomers is this; Matter and time were brought
into being by an infinitely powerful Creator, the Creator of
the universe that we inhabit is God, Lord of all the worlds.
52
stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a
Supreme Being?51
51
George Greenstein, The symbolic Universe, William Morrow, New York, 1988,
Pg. 27
53
that the Qur’an is not proof for him. I therefore produce
proof from the Bible itself.
The reality was that God made it appear to the Jews and
the Roman soldiers that they killed Jesus, but in actual fact
52
Mark 14:50
53
Qur’an- Chapter 4: Verse 157 ‘They (the Jews) said in boast, ‘we have killed
Jesus….’
54
The phrase, ‘Disciples according to the Bible’ refers to the fact that according to
Islam the true disciples did not fall prey to these discussions. Whether the New
Testament writings are the writings of the disciples, is a subject of its own.
54
they did not kill him. God’s purpose for doing so was to
deceive Jesus’ enemies in order to save Jesus.
55
Qur’an Chapter 4: Verse 158
55
Q. Was God justified in deceiving the people concerning
the crucifixion?
56
Once again, the phrase ‘Christianity’ used here for the followers of Jesus is done
more for convenience purposes. Rather, the true followers of Jesus were not at all
called by the name ‘Christian’. The term Christian began only to be used only in
Antioch years later. “And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch”
Acts 11:26
56
of Mark 12:29.57 Secondly, salvation depended on the
performance of righteous deeds, which Jesus preached
according to Mathew 5:20, ‘For I say unto you that except
your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the
scribes and the Pharisees; ye shall in no case enter into the
kingdom of heaven’.
57
“The first is, Hear O Israel: ‘The Lord our God, the Lord is one’.
57
automatically led some followers of Jesus to retaliate to the
boastful claim of the Jew saying to them; ‘Our master died
for us on the cross’. This very statement was adopted by
some of the ‘so called’ followers of Jesus in order to
console themselves that Jesus died for them on the cross.
Subsequently, this became an issue of faith ever since.
Like the case of Mr Bush consoling the family members of
those who were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, saying to
them that; ‘We are proud that your sons have died for us,
(i.e. for our country).’ No one up to the present assume
that soldiers die for the sins of their people. Likewise was
the case with Christianity, that eventually led to the issue
of people saying that Jesus died for their sins on the cross.
With the addition of the word ‘sin’ it, automatically
brought into Christianity the issue of salvation. Eventually
salvation according to them was centred around the
crucifixion, resurrection, redemption and the atonement.
This is the main sale's point. This is why Paul said that 'If
Christ was crucified and resurrected, then our preaching is
in vain'. This now became a turning point in the Christian
faith, drifting further away from truth of the real doctrines.
Can you imagine that the Jews wanted to kill Jesus. Jesus
on the other hand was praying to God to save him. The
disciples according to the Bible tried protecting Jesus by
selling their garments to buy swords. After all their effort
in trying to protect Jesus, how could they have afterwards
claimed that Jesus died for them on the cross?
58
Ever since, Christianity deals with everything after the
crucifixion, and has nothing to do with what Jesus
preached in his 33 years of life. I don’t say this blatantly or
to mock, but instead to reveal the reality of the situation.
The fact remains that Jesus initially preached ‘the first
commandment’ while the Christians today on the other
hand, on the first opportunity preach ‘salvation in the
blood of Christ’.
58
Not a third party sacrifice, in believing that someone else died for us on the
cross.
59
Self sacrifice means that God wants a sacrifice from us as individuals, because it
is we as individuals, who have broken the law and have sinned, and not just
believing that someone else died for our sins.
59
Conclusion
60
The self sacrifice of performing good deeds includes giving of charity, fasting,
praying five time a day, taking care of orphans etc. Any good action, though they
may be a performance of rituals are all under the category of self sacrifice,
especially that a sacrifice requires effort.
61
Unlike when Christians say ‘word of God’ in its figurative sense
60
61
62