Safety in Process Handout

Doc. N0.
PBIT-027-04
MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING Effective date October 27, 2007
PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK Page Page 1 of 13
PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK
MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING

In Accordance With ASME BPV Section V SE 709 – 2004 and 2005
Addenda, AWS D1.1,2004 Edition As Acceptance Criteria
DOCCUMENT NO. PBIT-027-04
THIS AND ALL STANDARD PRACTICE INSTRUCTIONS / OPERATING PROCEDURES

CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM ARE CONTROLLED
BY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE AND MAY NOT BE AMENDED
REVISED OR IN ANY ALTERED WITHOUT THIS AUTHORITY.
The signatures bellow indicate Reviewed and Authorization of all numbered pages in this
Operating Procedures up to including the date of authorization. This procedure is invalid without
page 1.
PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY
Name : Rasnaf Kalman Name : Name :
Position : ASNT Level II Position : Position :
Signature : Signature : Signature :
Date : October 27, 2007 Date : Date :

Doc. N0. PBIT-027-04
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION NO. CONTENT
1.0 SCOPE
2.0 REFERENCE
3.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
4.0 MAGNETIZATION EQUIPMENT / TECHNIQUES
5.0 MAGNETIC PARTICLES
6.0 SURFACE PREPARATION
7.0 MAGNETIZATION
8.0 EXAMINATION COVERAGE
9.0 SAFETY PRECAUTION
10.0 TECHNIQUE OF OPERATION
11.0 MAGNETIC STRENGTH CALIBRATION
12.0 INTERPRETATION AND RECORDING OF INDICATION
13.0 TYPICAL MAGNETIC PARTICLE INDICATIONS
14.0 EVALUATION OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE / SENSITIVITY
15.0 MARKING AND RECORDING
16.0 POST CLEANING AND DEMAGNETIZATION
17.0 TESTING PROCEDURE TECHNIQUE
18.0 REPORTING
19.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
APPENDIX 1 FLOW CHART OF MT
APPENDIX 2 AC MAGNETIC YOKE LIFTING POWER CHECK
APPENDIX 3 MAGNETIC FIELD INDICATOR
APPENDIX 4 TECHNIQUE SHEET No. TS 01 to TS-03
APPENDIX 5 MAGNETIC PARTICLE TEST REPORT FORM
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
1.0 SCOPE
1.1 This procedure specification describes the techniques for wet magnetic particles
testing on ferromagnetic materials, for surface and sub surface discontinuities. The
procedure applies to the testing of butt welds, fillet welds, plates and tubulars etc.
2.0 REFERENCE
2.1 ASME BPV Section V SE – 709, 2004 Edition and 2005 addenda
2.2 ASME BPV Section V, Article 7, 2004 Edition and 2005 addenda (As
complementary Reference)
2.3 AWS D1.1 – 2004 Edition. Table 6.1
2.4 PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK’S Written Practice Document BIT/MT-AWS
D1.1/01 Rev. 0 for NDT personnel Qualification and Certification
3.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND RESPONSIBILITY

3.1 ASNT NDT Level III shall be responsible for the administration of this procedure
specification.
3.2 ASNT NDT MT Level Tester certified under PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK’s written
practice for personnel Qualification and certification in NDT, Document No.
BIT/MT-AWS D1.1/01 Rev. 0 may carry out the test.
4.0 MAGNETIZATION EQUIPMENT / TECHNIQUES

4.1 Yoke Techniques
AC magnaflux. ESX. Parker – Research or Equivalent magnetic articulated yoke
shall be used localized magnetization of small and large component with wet
magnetic particles. Yoke shall be calibrated at least twice a year, or whenever it has
been subjected to major electric repair or damage. If it has not been in use for a year
or more, calibration shall be done prior to first use.
5.0 MAGNETIC PARTICLES

5.1 Wet magnetic Particles
Color contrast non-fluorescent wet magnetic particles suspended in a vehicle (oil
water, kerosene) or in pressurized cans shall be used. The mixing and concentration
of wet magnetic particle is not permitted.
Wet magnetic particles may be applied by spraying or flowing over the areas to be
inspected during magnetization.
Test surface temperature shall not exceed 50 degrees C or limitation set by
manufacture.
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
6.0 SURFACE PREPARATION

6.1 This surface of the part plus adjacent area (at least 1” on boat sides) to be tested shall
be essentially clean, dry and free of contaminants such as oil, grease, loose sand,
lint, thick paint (more than to mils / 50.8 m), welding flux and spatter. Mechanical
cleaning, chemical cleaning and sand blasting may be employed. Apply and evenly
thin layer of white contrast paint when wet magnetic particle issued.
7.0 MAGNETIZATION
7.1 A ferromagnetic material can be magnetized by passing and electric current trough
the material by an external source. Discontinuities may occur in any orientation, it
may be necessary to magnetic the part or area of interest twice or more sequentially
in different direction to approximately 90o to those of the first examination
7.2 The adequacy and direction of the magnetic field shall be verified using a magnetic
field indicator, with the exception of the magnetic flow (yoke) technique whereby
direction only may be verified. The adequacy of magnetic flow equipment shall be
verified using the lift test detailed I ASME BPV Section V SE – 709 Paragraph 14,
2004 Edition and 2005 addenda.
8.0 EXAMINATION COVERAGE

All examination shall be conducted with sufficient field overlap to ensure 100% coverage
at the required sensitivity.
9.0 SAFETY PRECAUTION

9.1 Pay highly attention to yoke electric shock, fire due to MT chemical being used, in
halation toxic material and magnetic particle.
9.2 Use appropriate personnel protective equipment.
10.0 TECHNIQUE OF OPERATION

10.1 Wet Magnetization Techniques
The surface of part being tested is bathed or sprayed with wet magnetic particles
and terminating the particle application simultaneously with at least 0.5 second.
Inspect the test surface while the west particles are following away and magnetizing
current is still on.
11.0 MAGNETIC STRENGTH CALIBRATION
11.1 Yoke magnetization Wet Magnetization Techniques
When using AC, the electromagnetic yokes should have a lifting force of at least 4.5
Kgs (10 Lbs) is used at 2 – 6” Yoke pole leg spacing and recorded as in appendix
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
12.0 INTERPRETATION AND RECORDING OF INDICATION
12.1 All indication shall be evaluated which is evaluated which is illuminated by

daylight or artificial light to a minimum level 1000 Lux (100 Fe) whether it is
relevant or non-relevant indication. The light source and level intensity is recorded
on MT report. Any indication which is believed to be non relevant shall be regarded
as defect until the indication is eliminated by surface conditioning or if it is
demonstrated to be non-relevant.
12.2 With Non-fluorescent, Wet particles
To determine the indication is relevant or non-relevant, remove the particles
attracted to the field leakage, after switching off the current. Visually inspect for
surface irregularities, then re-magnetize, apply particles are less lightly head.
12.3 When required, indication can be recorded by means of photograph s or sketch.
13.0 TYPICAL MAGNETIC PARTICLE INDICATIONS

Surface discontinuities with few exception procedure sharp and distinct magnetic particle
indications.
Near Surface discontinuities on the other hand produce less distinct of fuzzy magnetic
particle indications in comparison to surface discontinuities the magnetic particle
indication are board rather than sharp and the particles are less lightly held
14.0 EVALUATION OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE / SENSITIVITY
14.1 The performance/sensitivity of test system can be evaluated by one of the following
methods.
14.2 Artificial test part with discontinuities introduced like field indicator.
14.3 The test part should be magnetically same materials as the material of part being
tested example is the test Ring Specimen.
14.4 Magnetic field indicator
Magnetic field indicator (Pie Indicator or Burmah Castrol Type I but upon the
client) may be used as convenient rough check on adequacy and direction of part
magnetization but not as quantitative indicator of field strength or distribution.
Example of field indicators is a copper faced pie type (where a distinct line need to
be seen when used)
15.0 MARKING AND RECORDING

15.1 Where necessary for repaired procedures, the position of flaws may be marked on
the tested surface by a method which will not adversely effect that surface.
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
15.2 Indication shall be recorded and reported (see section 14 above) according to
classification.
15.3 “Crack and Cracklike Flaws” – position, size, orientation and type.
15.4 “Non relevant indication” – due to spurious effect, eg magnetic writing, changes in
section manufacturing marks, boundaries etc. Must be stringenthly tested prior to
confirmation by PT or other suitable NDT methods as Non Relevant. Wherever
practicable, these indications shall be dressed for confirmation as Non – Relevant.
16.0 POST CLEANING AND DEMAGNETIZATION
16.1 Post cleaning shall be carried out in case where residual or surface contrast
enhancement chemical for ferromagnetic particle could interfere with subsequent
processing service requirement.
Brushing and wiping of solvent damped rag may be employed in cleaning the part.
16.2 Demagnetization of part after test may be necessary but this will be only carried
out where specified by client and included in the contract agreed. It shall be carried
out to one techniques detailed in ASME BPV Section V SE – 709 Paragraph 18,
2004 Edition and 2005 Addenda.
17.0 TESTING PROCEDURE TECHNIQUE
17.1 The technique to carry out MT is detailed in separate techniques sheets. See
appendix 4. Techniques Sheet No. TS-01 and TS-03.
17.2 When required the techniques may be qualified on site during production test.
18.0 REPORTING
All MT shall be reported in standard format (Appendix 5) accompanied with sketches of
the part being tested and location of indication, if any. The report shall be submitted to
client and copy maintained by PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK. The client is responsible for
the safe keeping and distribution of the report.
19.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Acceptance of rejection of a component shall be interpreted according to the applicable
code or specification:
19.1 AWS D1.1 – 2004, Table 6.1

Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
APPENDIX 1
FLOW CHART OF MT
WET PARTICLE – NONFLOURESCENT APPLICATION
Surface Preparation with Solvent Cleaning
Apply White Contrast Paint
Apply magnetization
Evaluation and Reconfirm with PT (If Required)
Reporting and De-magnetization (If Required)
Post Cleaning with Solvent and Brush Cleaning (If Required)
APPENDIX 2
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
AC MAGNETIC YOKE LIFTING POWER CHECK

(EVERY 6 NONTHS)
CLIENT :
PROJECT :
PROCEDURE NO :
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA :
NO TEST RE- YOKE YOKE TEST POLE
DATE TEST MANUFACTURING SERIAL NO WEIGHT / SPACING
DATE /TYPE NO (INCH/MM)
APPENDIX 3
MAGNETIC FIELD INDICATOR

Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
PIE TYPE MAGNETIC FIELD INDICATOR
APPENDIX 4
TECHNIQUE SHEET No. TS 01 to TS-01
COMPONENT : Fillet welds (full or others penetration, node and nozzle welds)
TECHNICAL : Continuous magnetization, color contrast wet method
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
MATERIAL : Carbon Steel

MAGNETIC SOURCE : AC-ESX Yoke or AC Parker Research Contour Probe B100S or DA400S
CURRENT : AC
FLUX INDICATOR : Pie Indicator
POLE SPACING : Approximately 6”
BACKGROUND : Cleaned with brush and solvent then spray with magnaflux whote contrast paint WCP-2
or Equivalent
MAGNETIC PARTICLES : Magnaflux & 7HF or Equivalent
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA : See section 19.0
INSPECTION SEQUENCE:
1. Remove slag, weld spatters and other debris from weld surface
2. Spray white paint on test surface (weld). Wait till it dries.
3. Place the magnetic Yoke across the weld with pole spacing approximately 6”
4. Apply the magnetic ink between the poles and magnetic short shot the weld while the ink is following away from
the surface, visually inspect for indication.
5. Reposition the magnetic Yoke so that the magnetic field is perpendicular to that of step 3 above. Repeat step 4
above.
6. If indication is observed, determined whether the indication is caused by discontinuity or false/irrelevant
indication.
This can be done by removing the indication, visually examine the surface and re-MT.
Indication can be removed
7. Indication can be removed by light grinding. If indication still appear after grinding, repair procedure from client
shall be followed.
8. Inspection shall be carried out with sufficient lighting.
9. Demagnetization not required.
10. During a subsequent magnetization an overlap of least one-inch over the previous step is necessary to ensure
complete coverage.
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004

CURRENT : AC
or Equivalent
5. Reposition the magnetic Yoke so that the magnetic field is perpendicular to that of step 3 above. Repeat step 4
above.
indication.
shall be followed.
complete coverage.
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004

CURRENT : AC
or Equivalent
5. Reposition the magnetic Yoke at A – A or A’ – A’ as shown above.
indication.
shall be followed.
complete coverage.
APPENDIX 5
MAGNETIC PARTICLE TEST REPORT FORM
OWNER : REPORT NO :
CLIENT : DATE & TIME :
PROCEDURE & REVISION NO : STAGE OF FABRICATION :
Revision 0
AWS D1.1, 2004
Material : EQUIPMENT & CONSUMABLES USED:

Welding process : 1. Yoke :
Surface Preparation : 2. White Contrast
o
Metal Surface Temp : C Paint :
Light Meter : Intensity: Lux 3. Black Magnetic
Black Light Meter : Intensity:  W/Cm2 at 15 Ink :
Residual Magnetism: 4. Field Indicator :
5. Gaussmeter :
6. Demagnetization
Process :
7. Post Cleaning :
Rejection / Acceptance Code :
QUALITY REQUIREMENT :
As per ASME BPV Section V SE 709 “Standard Practice for Magnetic Particle Examination”.
EQUIPMENT SETTING :
The distance between the legs of the yoke was set varying between mm apart.
TECHNIQUE :
Wet continuous flow technique was adopted using magnetization separately in two different directions
perpendicular to each other.
ITEM JOINT WELDER RESULT TYPE OF
NO IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. DISCONTINUITY REMARKS
ACC. REJ.
SKETCH : Refer Attached
Inspected by Reviewed by Approved by

Safety in Process Handout

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Safety in Process Handout

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Doc. N0.

PT. BONNE INDO TEKNIK

MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING

DOCCUMENT NO. PBIT-027-04

THIS AND ALL STANDARD PRACTICE INSTRUCTIONS / OPERATING PROCEDURES

PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY

Name : Rasnaf Kalman Name : Name :

Position : ASNT Level II Position : Position :

Signature : Signature : Signature :

Date : October 27, 2007 Date : Date :

SECTION NO. CONTENT

3.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION AND RESPONSIBILITY

4.0 MAGNETIZATION EQUIPMENT / TECHNIQUES

5.0 MAGNETIC PARTICLES

6.0 SURFACE PREPARATION

8.0 EXAMINATION COVERAGE

9.0 SAFETY PRECAUTION

10.0 TECHNIQUE OF OPERATION

11.0 MAGNETIC STRENGTH CALIBRATION

11.1 Yoke magnetization Wet Magnetization Techniques

12.0 INTERPRETATION AND RECORDING OF INDICATION

12.1 All indication shall be evaluated which is evaluated which is illuminated by

13.0 TYPICAL MAGNETIC PARTICLE INDICATIONS

14.0 EVALUATION OF SYSTEM PERFORMANCE / SENSITIVITY

15.0 MARKING AND RECORDING

16.0 POST CLEANING AND DEMAGNETIZATION

17.0 TESTING PROCEDURE TECHNIQUE

19.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

19.1 AWS D1.1 – 2004, Table 6.1

WET PARTICLE – NONFLOURESCENT APPLICATION

Surface Preparation with Solvent Cleaning

Apply White Contrast Paint

Evaluation and Reconfirm with PT (If Required)

Reporting and De-magnetization (If Required)

Post Cleaning with Solvent and Brush Cleaning (If Required)

AC MAGNETIC YOKE LIFTING POWER CHECK

MAGNETIC FIELD INDICATOR

PIE TYPE MAGNETIC FIELD INDICATOR

MATERIAL : Carbon Steel

TECHNIQUE SHEET No. TS 01 to TS-02

MATERIAL : Carbon Steel

TECHNIQUE SHEET No. TS 01 to TS-03

MATERIAL : Carbon Steel

Material : EQUIPMENT & CONSUMABLES USED:

SKETCH : Refer Attached

Inspected by Reviewed by Approved by

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi