CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

1.0 CORROSION POLICY See Chapter 2

1.1 Is there a company policy for corrosion X Requirement for policy to be reviewed by
management? management,
1.2 Does it clearly state objectives for corrosion X
control?
1.3 Does it define measurable performance X
targets?
1.4 Does the policy demonstrate management X
commitment to
corrosion control?
1.5 Is there evidence of an awareness of this policy X
at all levels
within the organisation?
Senior Management?
Engineers & Technicians?
Offshore staff?
1.6 Are the personnel committed to the policy? X
1.7 Are review periods for the corrosion strategy X
specified?
2.0 CORROSION STRATEGY See Chapter 2

2.1 Is there a documented corrosion strategy for X Initial documents available from Amoco days and
the asset? a revisions was Started in 2003 but not issued,
2.2 Does it place responsibility for corrosion X
control with a group
or named individual within the organisation? Revision of this document should be completed to
2.3 Does the corrosion strategy interface with: X insure that it is relevant to the systems to be
Safety Case? supplied by Rehab
Performance Standards?
Verification Scheme?
Maintenance Strategy?
Operations Strategy?

2.4 Does the strategy state which items of plant are X

included and
excluded from its scope?

3.0 ASSESSMENT OF CORROSION RISKS See Chapter 3

3.1 Is a formal Corrosion Risk Assessment (CRA) X Rehab to deliver Gallium system which shall
method used? contain CRA in accordance with API 580

3.2 Does this drive the mitigation, monitoring, and It will when Delivered
inspection activities?

3.3 Does it assess the likelihood/rate of X

deterioration?

3.4 Are all likely methods of corrosion X In addition the system has the ability to be
deterioration considered? amended to site requirements

3.5 Do these consider the safety consequences from X

corrosion
threats?

Page 1 of 6
 CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

3.6 Does it use any of the following as inputs? Currently Unknown, Models for consequence and
Safety Policy? probability have been requested
Environmental Policy?
Legislative Requirements?
Asset Business Plan?
Design Conditions?
Current Operating Conditions?

3.7 Are the results from historic operational X

corrosion monitoring
used?

3.8 Does this include cross asset/other operator All Assets within GOS will be detailed in system
experience? but linkage between assets unknown

3.9 Are the operating conditions against which the X Data should be reviewed at peer review of risk
CRA is carried out clearly stated? rankings

3.10 Does the CRA consider process excursions out Unknown

with the normal operating case?

3.11 Does the CRA consider future operational Unknown

scenarios or "what if" cases?

3.12 Are appropriate methods of detection for the X Inspection method assigned within Gallium
expected deterioration methods documented?

3.13 Does a cross discipline peer group review the X Intension is to complete Peer review after initial
CRA results? risk calculation for each asset

3.14 Is the CRA Maintained "live"? X

3.15 Is the CRA subject to periodic review? Review procedure yet to be established

3.16 Are the initiating factors for a review Purposed review After completions / evaluations of
documented? inspection results or Modification to system

4.0 ORGANISATION & PERSONNEL See Chapter 3

4.1 Is the organisation chart for corrosion X Organisation chart available

management fully documented?

4.2 Does this include any contractors used in Contractors within group shown but no 3rd parties
corrosion management?

4.3 Does it reflect current organisation? Requires updating with new starts and reporting
line may need clarification
4.4 Are sufficient resources available to implement Yet to be established, proposal is in place to
the corrosion strategy? increases group

4.5 Are roles and responsibilities for individuals X Job description held by Integrity manager
clearly defined and documented within the
strategy?

4.6 Are authorities and reporting routes clear and Reporting route are generally known through
documented? experience, but not documemeted

Page 2 of 6
 CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

4.7 Are interfaces with other parts of the X Interface at General Managers Level occur at daily
organisation visible? meetings

4.8 Have gaps and overlaps in responsibility been Responsibilities Likely to change on delivery of
identified and eliminated? rehab and review should be completed.

4.9 Are the procedures in place to assess the X Competency procedures and matrix has been made
competency of staff assigned to corrosion by may require expansion to show all aspects of
management activities? CMS

4.10 Does this extend to measures of competency at Under Development

all stages in the process?

4.11 Is training on corrosion awareness given to X Programe initiated but may require review after
non-specialist delivery of Rehab
personnel?
Onshore?
Offshore?

5.0 PLANNING & IMPLEMENTING See Chapter 4

5.1 Are inspection programmers developed using a X Currently not full RBI system used, informal
Risk Based Inspection Methodology? identification of risk is used to target inspection.
Gallium system will deliver full RBI system
5.2 Does this relate inspection periods to a X Currently inspection based on fixed durations,
prediction of deterioration? Gallium system will deliver relation between
deterioration rate and inspection
5.3 Are activity plans included within the corrosion X Remedial Actions only at present
strategy? The intension is to set up PM with in Maximo and
relate all required activities to carry out inspection
5.4 Does this include: X Spread sheets available for major High risk items
Long Term (circa 5 year) plan? with due date by quarter / year.
Short Term (circa 12 months) plan? Maximo will show all inspection activities when
fully implemented
5.5 Are plans integrated with: X Informally only
Maintenance planning?
Operations planning? Intension to use 14 day and 90 day plan to form tie
with operations and maintenance
5.6 Is on-line corrosion monitoring devices used? X Coupons, LPR Probes, water analysis, micro
Biological analysis undertaken
5.7 Are locations for corrosion monitoring and X No work pack issued for these routine task
inspection clearly identified within the work
packs?

5.8 Are suitable arrangements in place to monitor X RAT and scaffolding utilized
inaccessible areas?

5.9 Are appropriate methods of detection for the X

expected deterioration methods documented
which indicates appropriate corrosion
monitoring devices and inspection techniques?

5.10 Are the limitations of the applied corrosion X Informally only

monitoring and inspection techniques known?

5.11 Do the work packs include procedures for the X Work packs not produced and procedure under
use of relevant inspection techniques? development

Page 3 of 6
 CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

5.12 Do the work packs include criteria of non- X No

conformance?

5.13 If a non-conformance is identified does the X No

work pack define the reporting procedures?

5.14 Do these define time scales for action?
5.15 Are opportunity reporting systems used out with
planned activities?
5.16 Do the Planned Maintenance Routines include
opportunity inspection reporting?
X No, remedial action time framed from within
department memo’s
X But a representative at the 14 /90 day planning
meeting would increase knowledge of
opportunities
No

6.0 DATA MANAGEMENT & ANALYSIS See Chapter 4

6.1 Is the data to be gathered for corrosion X Yes but not centrally controlled
management requirements clearly defined?

6.2 Are appropriate techniques for gathering the X But review to insure current best practice is used
required data used? may be appropriate
6.3 Is it clear who should receive and evaluate this X All data controlled By CIC department
data?

6.4 Are procedures in place to validate the X No external validation is undertaken

gathered data?

6.5 Is the location where the corrosion monitoring X

& inspection data stored defined?

6.6 Can historic data be easily retrieved? Filing system is paper copy thus time to retrieve
histories, copies held electrically
6.7 Are there database systems used for storage of X Yes but not integrated with in the CMS
corrosion monitoring data?

6.8 Is process conditions, inspection, corrosion X

monitoring & chemical data collected and
evaluated centrally?

6.9 Is consideration given to the limitations of the X

inspection and monitoring techniques given
during evaluation of data?

6.10 Does the analysis of data consider short and X

long-term implications for corrosion control?

6.11 Are investigations conducted to identify the X Not for all failures
underlying cause of corrosion incidents?

7.0 REPORTING See Chapter 4

7.1 Are the reporting routes clearly defined within No strategy in place but departmental reporting is
the corrosion strategy? controlled via memos

7.2 Is information dissemination within the X Memo system

organisation effective?

Page 4 of 6
 CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

7.3 Are the recipients of different levels of reports X Memo system

defined?

7.4 Are systems in place to share corrosion No

knowledge internally within the organisation?

7.5 Are arrangements in place to communicate No

corrosion incident experience externally?

7.6 Does operational experience get fed back into X

design?

8.0 MONITORING & MEASURING PERFORMANCE See Chapter 5

8.1 Are measures of the success of the corrosion No but Integrity issues are monitored through GOS
management activities in place? Performance contact

8.2 Do these measure performance against No

objectives set in the policy or strategy?

8.3 Are Key Performance Indicators (KPI's) used? No

8.4 Are the performance measures meaningful and N/A

practical?

8.5 Is information on performance widely X GOS Performance contact

available?

8.6 Are records of loss of containment maintained? X On line leak register

Hydrocarbon releases?
Non hydrocarbon releases

8.7 Are targets set for follow up actions to be Unknown

closed out?

8.8 Are measures in place to record the cost of X Direct cost ie loss due to leaks / shutdown,
corrosion including direct and indirect costs? chemical consumption, third party cost.

No accounting for in direct costing saving form

Preventive actions or extension of inspection
periods
9.0 EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE

9.1 Are the Corrosion Management activities X QPR

subject to a formal review?

9.2 Are reviews carried out at a specified period X QPR

and is this documented?

9.3 Does the reviews include all parties in the No review is within Gupco only no review with 3rd
corrosion management process and is this parties
documented?

9.4 Does the review involve key contractors? No

9.5 Does the distribution of the findings include X

senior management?

Page 5 of 6
 CORROSION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT

Date: 12/07/06 Asset(s) GOS By: Ian Roberts

:
Atef Mohammed Tarawa

Item Question Yes Not Comments

Used

9.6 Are actions as a result of the review X GOS Performance contact

implemented within a specified timeframe?

9.7 Does the review evaluate any benefits to be X RAT new techniques last method to be assed
gained from introducing new techniques or
technology?

9.8 Does the review feedback into the corrosion Not currently
strategy?

10.0 AUDITING See Chapter 7

10.1 Are the Corrosion Management activities X Internally and Externally

audited:
Internally?
Externally?

10.2 Are records of audits maintained? X

10.3 Is there an identified party to ensure Set up of auditing system ongoing

recommendations are implemented?

10.4 Are contractors in the corrosion management No

process audited?

Page 6 of 6