Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I consider the success factors of venture companies' technology commercialization in Daejeon area. For this
purpose, the concept of technology commercialization and success factors of technology commercialization were examined. As
a practical case study, I reviewed the technology commercialization ecosystem of Daedeok Innopolis, a representative
innovation cluster in Korea, and examined the major factors to consider when promoting technology commercialization. The
technology commercialization strategy for the success of the technology commercialization was derived in the following three
ways. First, it is to establish a systematic technology commercialization strategy based on future technology prospects. Second,
identifying difficulties in technology commercialization for overseas market entry and establishing strategies. Third, the
establishment of a firm open and innovative BM model for technology commercialization. It is necessary to have a corporate
management system that can achieve successful technology commercialization through periodic review of these technology
commercialization strategies.
Keywords: technology commercialization strategy, venture companies, open innovation
1. INTRODUCTION
In today's rapidly changing business environment, new commercial products are rapidly becoming more important
[1]. Companies that strategically promote such technology commercialization will win in a short period of time, but
those that fail to succeed in technology commercialization will disappear by innovation of other companies. [3]. In this
sense, successful technology commercialization is more than just one product winning the market, which is an
important factor in determining the survival of a company. In Daejeon, there are more than 1,100 venture companies.
Daedeok Innopolis is the biggest innovation cluster in Korea. Venture companies are growing with various technical
cooperation activities with universities and research institutes [2]. The technology commercialization strategy that is
considered to be important in venture companies in Daejeon area can be considered from various viewpoints. In this
paper, I consider important factors in the commercialization of venture companies in Daejeon region and consider
strategic directions for the success of these technologies. There are many factors that need to be taken into
consideration when promoting technology commercialization. Among these factors, strategic aspects, foreign market
entry and open innovation aspects are examined. First, the concept of technology commercialization and considerations
for promoting high technology commercialization will be examined from the viewpoint of dominant design,
overcoming of chasm and promising technology commercialization. After that, the ecosystem of technology
commercialization in Daejeon area and the technology commercialization strategy based on it were examined in detail.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The current management environment is called the hyper-competitive environment [3]. This hyper-competitive
environment is characterized by a shortened period of stabilization as the process of intensification of competition
rapidly develops, and it is characterized by a very unstable condition beyond the intensity of competition [3]. In the
competition situation, local competition is extinguished, competition intensity is drastically increased, and competition
rules are diversified and continuously destroyed. In addition, the competitive environment is rapidly changing, leading
to extreme uncertainties [3].
The most important cause of the hyper-competition environment is technological innovation. Current technological
innovation is happening simultaneously in all industries and its cycle is also very short. The current situation is always
the era of technological innovation, and after the IT technology, new BT and NT technologies are emerging and are
converging with the existing industry and developing[3]. Under these extremely uncertain and highly volatile
competition environments, existing competitive advantages may collapse in an instant, and companies that do well may
fall [3], [4]. It is difficult for existing innovation companies to catch up with new technology opportunities in the
framework of existing business operations. However, such opportunities are likely to be captured by new ventures, such
as start-ups [3], [4]. Professor Christensen expressed the difficulties of these existing innovators with the words
"Innovator's dilemma" [3], [4]. Companies that are well-versed in the emerging and industrialized technologies and
adaptation to these changing technologies that are in flux with other technologies and who are good at technology
commercialization will grow[3], [4]. With only a few new technologies and ideas, venture companies emerging as
superpowers in just a few years in the global market are emerging[3], [4]. As such, the current business environment is
in a period of radical change. In this disconnected transition, opportunities for new venture start-ups are widespread,
and through such venture start-ups, existing industries are naturally turning into new industries[5]. In this sense,
professional management of venture start-up, technology commercialization and technology management is very
important and meaningful.
customers in three markets [11]. It is divided into early market, mainstream market, and end market according to
technology life cycle [11]. In the early market, it is divided into innovator and early adopter, and the mainstream
market consists of early majority and late majority [11].
First, it is necessary to cooperate with the R & D and marketing departments considering the characteristics of the
market from the early stage [12]. Second, the planning capacity should be shifted to the market rather than technology-
driven [12]. Various market-oriented technology commercialization tools such as technology roadmap, technology tree,
and QFD should be utilized. Through these efforts, entrepreneurs can overcome the limitations of the initial market and
enter the mainstream market. In general, the initiative to overcome the chasm is as follows; Providing whole products
that combine all the services that customers want, utilizing word of mouth effects on the products, and securing market
leadership by winning in the early market[11]. In this market, the initiative can be realized by reflecting the needs of
the market and improving the usability, customer-friendliness of high-tech products [11]. Therefore, it is necessary to
go beyond technical approaches and marketing / market approaches, and to integrate them into commercialization in a
direction to generate synergy.
Source: Venture Business (2016), Venture Business Status (April 2016), [22].
Daejeon's venture business should grow not only through business development by establishing its own technology
commercialization strategy but also by continuous cooperation with Daedeok Innopolis. Daedeok Innopolis has a
variety of enterprise support programs, ranging from venture start-ups to industry-academia cooperation, corporate
growth, and overseas market entry. Companies can grow step by step through technological development, human
resource exchange, and information exchange through cooperation with innovation clusters. The desirable corporate
strategy of these companies is shown through the 2 * 2 matrix.
In this paper, the technology commercialization strategy is derived through the investigation of the status of venture
companies in Daejeon area. There are more than 1,100 venture companies in Daejeon that link with Daedeok
Innopolis. These venture companies can be developed through successful technology commercialization. Based on this
fact, this paper examines the direction of technology commercialization strategy of venture companies in Daejeon. In
addition to the technology commercialization strategy considered in this paper, various technology commercialization
factors can be considered. However, three kinds of technology commercialization strategies are derived through theory
and case studies. First, it is the establishment of systematic technology commercialization strategy based on future
prediction. Second, the establishment of a technology commercialization strategy to advance into overseas markets.
Third, the establishment of a firm open and innovative BM model for technology commercialization. Through this
study, venture firms will be able to consider strategic factors in establishing technology commercialization strategy. It is
very important to establish a technology management system through systematic technology commercialization strategy
for these venture companies. In this paper, I did not consider the detailed technical commercialization strategy, nor did
I consider the problems and policy support. In the future, further research will be carried out to the extent not covered
in this paper.
REFERENCES
[1] Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization.
Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377-398.
[2] Hwang, H. R., Kim, K. K., & Jeong, H. K. (2013). A Study on the Technology Commercialization Policy for
Technology-based SMEs: Case on Daedeok Innopolis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and
Entrepreneurship, 8.
[3] D'aveni, R. A. (2010). Hypercompetition. Simon and Schuster.
[4] Christensen, C. M., & Christensen, C. M. (2003). The innovator's dilemma: The revolutionary book that will
change the way you do business (p. 320). New York, NY: HarperBusiness Essentials.
[5] Timmons, J. A., & Spinelli, S. (1994). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century (Vol. 4). Burr
Ridge, IL: Irwin.
[6] Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of
Management Studies, 45(8), 1401-1423.
[7] Hornsby, J. S., Naffziger, D. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Montagno, R. V. (1993). An interactive model of the corporate
entrepreneurship process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(2), 29-37.
[8] Webb, J. W., Kistruck, G. M., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2010). The entrepreneurship process in base of
the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 555-581.
[9] Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in
organizations. Journal of management studies, 38(1), 45-65.
[10] Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology review, 80(7), 40-47.
[11] Moore, G. A. (1991). Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers
(Collins Business Essentials). HarperBusiness, New York Google Scholar.
[12] Rein, G. L. (2004). From experience: creating synergy between marketing and research and development. Journal
of Product Innovation Management, 21(1), 33-43.
[13] Day, G. S., Schoemaker, P. J., & Gunther, R. E. (Eds.). (2004). Wharton on managing emerging technologies.
John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Chiesa, V. (2001). R&D strategy and organisation: Managing technical change in dynamic contexts.
[15] Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping—a planning framework for evolution
and revolution. Technological forecasting and social change, 71(1-2), 5-26.
[16] Goodnow, J. D., & Hansz, J. E. (1972). Environmental determinants of overseas market entry strategies. Journal
of International Business Studies, 3(1), 33-50.
[17] Crick, D. (2009). The internationalisation of born global and international new venture SMEs. International
Marketing Review, 26(4/5), 453-476.
[18] Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm.
Oxford University Press on Demand.
[19] Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology.
Harvard Business Press.
[20] MKE, 2011, 2 phase Master Plan for the development of Development of the Innopolis.
[21] Daedeok Innopolis (n.d.) Retrieved March 1 2018, from http://www.innopolis.or.kr
[22] Venture Business (2016), Venture Business Status (April 2016)
AUTHOR
Won Il, Lee is a Professor in the Department of Business Administration & Accounting at Hanbat National University
in Daejeon, South Korea. He is also currently the director of technology entrepreneurship training center at start-up
support foundation at Hanbat National University. He was a visiting professor at Portland State University in the US in
2018. He received a B.A., M.S., and Ph.D. in Business Administration from Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Before joining the faculty of Hanbat National University in 2012, he worked for the KISTEP(Korea Institute of Science
and Technology Evaluation and Planning) as a national science and technology planning researcher for years. His main
research interests include technology strategy, technology commercialization, innovation management, and innovation
clusters.