Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Energy; The Centroid Moment Tensor Project; Magnitude and Faulting; Foreshocks,
Aftershocks, and Swarms; Seismic Intensity (Rossi-Forrel Scale, Modified Mercalli Scale,
Submitted by:
GERONA, Raywin F.
CE-5E
Submitted to:
is based on measurement of the maximum motion recorded by a seismograph. Several scales have
Richter magnitude
The Richter magnitude scale is used for measuring the strength or size of earthquakes refers
to the original "magnitude scale" developed by Charles F. Richter and presented in his landmark
1935 paper, and later revised and renamed the Local Magnitude scale, denoted as "ML" or "ML".
The Richter magnitude of an earthquake is determined from the logarithm of the amplitude
function A0 depends only on the epicentral distance of the station, 𝛿. In practice, readings from all
observing stations are averaged after adjustment with station-specific corrections to obtain the ML
value.
Average frequency
(estimated)
Minor
Often felt by people, but very rarely causes
Over 100,000 per
3.0–3.9 damage. Shaking of indoor objects can be
year
noticeable.
over.
Can cause damage of varying severity to
everyone.
9.0 and collapse to all buildings. Heavy damage and One per 10 to 50
Surface-Wave Magnitude
The surface wave magnitude (MS) scale is one of the magnitude scales used in
surface waves that travel primarily along the uppermost layers of the Earth. It is currently used
earthquakes.
Surface wave magnitude was initially developed in the 1950s by the same researchers
who developed the local magnitude scale ML in order to improve resolution on larger
earthquakes.
Body-Wave Magnitude
Body-Wave Magnitude (MB) calculates the magnitude of primary and secondary seismic
A P-wave is one of the two main types of elastic body waves, called seismic waves in
seismology. P-waves travel faster than other seismic waves and hence are the first signal from
In seismology, S-waves, secondary waves, or shear waves are type of elastic wave, and are
one of the two main types of elastic body waves, so named because they move through the
body of an object.
Moment Magnitude
The moment magnitude scale (Mw or Mw) developed by Kanamori (1977) and Hanks &
The moment magnitude (Mw) scale, based on the concept of seismic moment, is uniformly
applicable to all sizes of earthquakes but is more difficult to compute than the other types.
The seismic moment is a measure of the size of an earthquake based on the area of fault rupture,
the average amount of slip, and the force that was required to overcome the friction sticking the
rocks together that were offset by faulting. Seismic moment can also be calculated from the
The concept of seismic moment was introduced in 1966 by Keiiti Aki, a professor of
geophysics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Using detailed field studies of the 1964
Niigata earthquake and data from a new generation of seismographs in the World-Wide
Standardized Seismograph Network (WWSSN), he first confirmed that an earthquake is "a release
of accumulated strain energy by a rupture", and that this can be modeled by a "double couple".
With further analysis he showed how the energy radiated by seismic waves can be used to estimate
the energy released by the earthquake. This was done using seismic moment, defined as
M0 = μūS
with μ being the rigidity of moving a fault with a surface area over an average dislocation or
distance of ū. Modern formulations replace μūS with the equivalent D̄A, known as the geometric
moment or potency. By this equation the moment determined from the double couple of the seismic
waves can be related to the moment calculated from knowledge of the surface area of fault slippage
and the amount of slip. In the case of the Niigata earthquake the dislocation estimated from the
SEISMIC ENERGY
Seismic waves or Seismic Energy are waves of energy that travel through the Earth's layers,
and are a result of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, magma movement, large landslides and large
man-made explosions that give out low-frequency acoustic energy. Many other natural and
Seismic waves are studied by geophysicists called seismologists. Seismic wave fields are recorded
Among the many types of seismic waves, one can make a broad distinction between body
waves, which travel through the Earth, and surface waves, which travel at the Earth's surface.
• Surface waves travel across the surface. Surface waves decay more slowly with distance
• Particle motion of surface waves is larger than that of body waves, so surface waves tend
Body waves travel through the interior of the Earth along paths controlled by the material
properties in terms of density and modulus (stiffness). The density and modulus, in turn, vary
according to temperature, composition, and material phase. This effect resembles the refraction of
light waves. Two types of particle motion result in two types of body waves: Primary and
Secondary waves.
A. Primary waves
Primary waves (P-waves) are compressional waves that are longitudinal in nature.
P waves are pressure waves that travel faster than other waves through the earth to arrive
at seismograph stations first, hence the name "Primary". These waves can travel through
any type of material, including fluids, and can travel nearly 1.7 times faster than the S
waves. In air, they take the form of sound waves, hence they travel at the speed of sound.
Typical speeds are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water and about 5000 m/s in granite.
B. Secondary waves
Secondary waves (S-waves) are shear waves that are transverse in nature.
Following an earthquake event, S-waves arrive at seismograph stations after the faster-
moving P-waves and displace the ground perpendicular to the direction of propagation.
Depending on the propagational direction, the wave can take on different surface
characteristics; for example, in the case of horizontally polarized S waves, the ground
moves alternately to one side and then the other. S-waves can travel only through solids,
as fluids (liquids and Agases) do not support shear stresses. S-waves are slower than P-
waves, and speeds are typically around 60% of that of P-waves in any given material.
Surface waves
Seismic surface waves travel along the Earth's surface. They can be classified as a form of
mechanical surface waves. They are called surface waves, as they diminish as they get further from
the surface. They travel more slowly than seismic body waves (P and S). In large earthquakes,
A. Rayleigh waves
Rayleigh waves, also called ground roll, are surface waves that travel as ripples
with motions that are similar to those of waves on the surface of water (note, however, that
the associated particle motion at shallow depths is retrograde, and that the restoring force
in Rayleigh and in other seismic waves is elastic, not gravitational as for water waves). The
existence of these waves was predicted by John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, in 1885.
They are slower than body waves, roughly 90% of the velocity of S waves for typical
homogeneous elastic media. In a layered medium (like the crust and upper mantle) the
velocity of the Rayleigh waves depends on their frequency and wavelength. See also Lamb
waves.
B. Love waves
Love waves are horizontally polarized shear waves (SH waves), existing only in
the presence of a semi-infinite medium overlain by an upper layer of finite thickness. They
are named after A.E.H. Love, a British mathematician who created a mathematical model
of the waves in 1911. They usually travel slightly faster than Rayleigh waves, about 90%
Seismic waves are mostly caused by earthquakes, although they can also be created by explosions
Seismic waves occur when earthquakes happen. The seismic waves are what scientists use the
Moment Tensor
Event locations and magnitudes give limited insight into the processes that control the
growth and dynamics of hydraulic fractures. Our understanding of reservoir behavior can be
enhanced by considering the seismic moment tensor representations of these events, which serve
as a direct snapshot of the instantaneous deformation of the surrounding rock by the seismicity.
comprising of nine generalized couples, or nine sets of two vectors. The tensor depends of the
source strength and fault orientation. It is often represented with "beach balls" just like the focal
The nine generalized couples of the seismic moment tensor. Modified after Aki and
Richards (1980).
Focal Mechanisms
orientation at the time of rupture governs the direction of slip on the fault plane, and the beach ball
also depicts this stress orientation. In this schematic, the gray quadrants contain the tension axis
(T), which reflects the minimum compressive stress direction, and the white quadrants contain the
pressure axis (P), which reflects the maximum compressive stress direction. The computed focal
mechanisms show only the P and T axes and do not use shading.
These focal mechanisms are computed using a method that attempts to find the best fit to
the direction of P-first motions observed at each station. For a double-couple source mechanism
(or only shear motion on the fault plane), the compression first-motions should lie only in the
quadrant containing the tension axis, and the dilatation first-motions should lie only in the quadrant
containing the pressure axis. However, first-motion observations will frequently be in the wrong
quadrant. This occurs because a) the algorithm assigned an incorrect first-motion direction because
the signal was not impulsive, b) the earthquake velocity model, and hence, the earthquake location
is incorrect, so that the computed position of the first-motion observation on the focal sphere (or
ray azimuth and angle of incidence with respect to vertical) is incorrect, or c) the seismometer is
mis-wired, so that "up" is "down". The latter explanation is not a common occurrence. For
mechanisms computed using only first-motion directions, these incorrect first-motion observations
may greatly affect the computed focal mechanism parameters. Depending on the distribution and
quality of first-motion data, more than one focal mechanism solution may fit the data equally well.
For mechanisms calculated from first-motion directions as well as some methods that
model waveforms, there is an ambiguity in identifying the fault plane on which slip occurred from
the orthogonal, mathematically equivalent, auxiliary plane. We illustrate this ambiguity with four
examples (B). The block diagrams adjacent to each focal mechanism illustrate the two possible
types of fault motion that the focal mechanism could represent. Note that the view angle is 30-
degrees to the left of and above each diagram. The ambiguity may sometimes be resolved by
comparing the two fault-plane orientations to the alignment of small earthquakes and aftershocks.
The first three examples describe fault motion that is purely horizontal (strike slip) or vertical
(normal or reverse). The oblique-reverse mechanism illustrates that slip may also have components
Göran Ekström and Co-Principal Investigator Meredith Nettles at the Lamont-Doherty Earth
Observatory (LDEO) of Columbia University. The project was founded by Adam Dziewonski at
Harvard University and operated there as the Harvard CMT Project from 1982-2006, led first by
Prof. Dziewonski and later by Prof. Ekström. During the summer of 2006, the activities of the
CMT Project moved with Prof. Ekström to LDEO. This research effort moves forward under the
name "The Global CMT Project". The main dissemination point for information and results from
The CMT project has been continuously funded by the National Science Foundation since
earthquakes with M>5 globally, and accumulation of the results in the CMT catalog.
2. Rapid determination of moment tensors for earthquakes with M>5.5 globally and quick
3. Curation of the CMT catalog, which contains more than 25,000 moment tensors for
Foreshocks
A foreshock is an earthquake that occurs before a larger seismic event (the mainshock) and
is related to it in both time and space. The designation of an earthquake as foreshock, mainshock
or aftershock is only possible after the full sequence of events has happened.
Foreshock activity has been detected for about 40% of all moderate to large earthquakes,
and about 70% for events of M>7.0. They occur from a matter of minutes to days or even longer
before the main shock; for example, the 2002 Sumatra earthquake is regarded as a foreshock of
the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake with a delay of more than two years between the two events.
Some great earthquakes (M>8.0) show no foreshock activity at all, such as the M8.6 1950 India -
China earthquake.
The observation of foreshocks associated with many earthquakes suggests that they are
part of a preparation process prior to nucleation. In one model of earthquake rupture, the process
forms as a cascade, starting with a very small event that triggers a larger one, continuing until the
main shock rupture is triggered. However, analysis of some foreshocks has shown that they tend
to relieve stress around the fault. In this view, foreshocks and aftershocks are part of the same
process. This is supported by an observed relationship between the rate of foreshocks and the rate
earthquakes, most notably in the case of the 1975 Haicheng earthquake in China, where an
evacuation was triggered by an increase in activity. However, most earthquakes lack obvious
foreshock patterns and this method has not proven useful, as most small earthquakes are not
foreshocks, leading to probable false alarms. In short, foreshocks are earthquakes that precede
larger earthquakes in the same location. An earthquake cannot be identified as a foreshock until
Worldwide the probability that an earthquake will be followed within 3 days by a large
earthquake nearby is somewhere just over 6%. In California, that probability is about 6%. This
means that there is about a 94% chance that any earthquake will NOT be a foreshock. In California,
about half of the biggest earthquakes were preceded by foreshocks; the other half were not. At this
time, we cannot tell whether or not an earthquake is a foreshock until something larger happens
after it.
Aftershocks
Aftershocks are smaller earthquakes that occur in the same general area during the days to
years following a larger event or "mainshock." They occur within 1-2 fault lengths away and
during the period of time before the background seismicity level has resumed. As a general rule,
aftershocks represent minor readjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of
the mainshock. The frequency of these aftershocks decreases with time. Historically, deep
earthquakes (>30 km) are much less likely to be followed by aftershocks than shallow earthquakes.
Large earthquakes can have hundreds to thousands of instrumentally detectable aftershocks, which
Most aftershocks are located over the full area of fault rupture and either occur along the
fault plane itself or along other faults within the volume affected by the strain associated with the
main shock. Typically, aftershocks are found up to a distance equal to the rupture length away
from the fault plane. Aftershocks are dangerous because they are usually unpredictable, can be of
a large magnitude, and can collapse buildings that are damaged from the main shock. Bigger
earthquakes have more and larger aftershocks and the sequences can last for years or even longer
1. Omori’s Law
after the main shock. This empirical relation was first described by Fusakichi Omori
𝑘
𝑛(𝑡) =
(𝑐 + 𝑡)
where k and c are constants, which vary between earthquake sequences. A modified
version of Omori's law, now commonly used, was proposed by Utsu in 1961.
𝑘
𝑛(𝑡) =
(𝑐 + 𝑡)𝑝
where p is a third constant which modifies the decay rate and typically falls in the
range 0.7–1.5.
time. The rate of aftershocks is proportional to the inverse of time since the
mainshock and this relationship can be used to estimate the probability of future
stochastic, while tending to follow these patterns. As this is an empirical law, values
of the parameters are obtained by fitting to data after a mainshock has occurred,
2. Båth's law
The other main law describing aftershocks is known as Båth's Law and this
states that the difference in magnitude between a main shock and its largest
3. Gutenberg–Richter law
size scaling, which refers to the relationship between the magnitude and total
𝑁 = 10𝑎−𝑏𝑀
Where:
M is the magnitude
The mainshock is the largest earthquake in a sequence, sometimes preceded by one or more
foreshocks, and almost always followed by many aftershocks. Here is a graphical representation
of the full series of the events of foreshock-mainshock-aftershock sequence from the USGS (U.S.
Foreshocks only prepares the faulting of the crust and then followed by the mainshock. The
mainshock is the largest earthquake in magnitude that affect the crust of the earth and induce
faulting. And lastly, a series of aftershocks follow to help the crust of the earth adjust to the its
new form.
Earthquake Swarms
Earthquake swarms are events where a local area experiences sequences of many
earthquakes striking in a relatively short period of time. The length of time used to define the
swarm itself varies, but may be of the order of days, weeks, or months. Numerous earthquakes
occur locally over an extended period without a clear sequence of foreshocks, main quakes and
aftershocks. They are therefore nothing extraordinary. Swarms usually end after a few days or
months. Only seldom does the strength and number of earthquakes increase over time or do occur
single, damaging events. How an earthquake swarm develops over time is just as difficult to predict
Many earthquake swarms occur in regions with complex contiguous fracture systems. The
theory is that they are related to the movement of fluid gases and liquids in the Earth’s crust.
magnitudes between 5 and 6. The quake was felt in varying intensities in surrounding areas and as
far as Manila’s financial district of Makati. The movement was felt in varying intensities in about
40 towns in Batangas, Laguna, Cavite and Quezon and in metropolitan Manila. Nearly 800 small
aftershocks were reported but they were too weak to trigger a tsunami.
Here is a diagram to further understand its difference from the normal sequencing of
earthquakes:
SEISMIC INTENSITY
The Rossi–Forel scale was one of the first seismic scales to reflect earthquake intensities.
Switzerland in the late 19th century, it was used for about two decades until the introduction of the
The Rossi–Forel scale and/or its modifications is still in use in some countries, such as the
Philippines.
same model, but not by several seismographs of different kinds. The shock felt by an experienced
observer.
• II. Extremely feeble tremor. Recorded by several seismographs of different kinds. Felt
• III. Feeble tremor. Felt by several persons at rest. Strong enough for the direction or
duration to be appreciable.
• IV. Slight tremor. Felt by persons in motion. Disturbance of movable objects, doors,
some bells.
• VI. Strong tremor. General awakening of those asleep. General ringing of bells.
Oscillation of chandeliers, stopping of clocks, visible agitation of trees and shrubs. Some startled
• VII. Very strong tremor. Overthrow of movable objects, fall of plaster, ringing of church
• X. Extremely high intensity tremor. Great disaster, ruins, disturbance of the strata,
The effect of an earthquake on the Earth's surface is called the intensity. The intensity scale
consists of a series of certain key responses such as people awakening, movement of furniture,
damage to chimneys, and finally - total destruction. It was developed in 1931 by the American
seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale, composed of increasing levels of
Roman numerals.
The Modified Mercalli scale is given as originally abridged by Wood and Neumann (1931)
the unabridged scale is reproduced in Stover and Coffman (1993). Since 1931 it has become clear
that many phenomena that Wood and Neumann (1931) originally used as criteria to define the
highest Modified Mercalli intensities (X and above) are related less to the level of ground shaking
than to the presence of ground conditions susceptible to spectacular failure or to the ease with
which seismic faulting of different style and depth can propagate to the ground surface. Criteria
based on such phenomena are down weighted now in assigning of USGS intensities (Stover and
Coffman, 1993).
I Not felt Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.
chimneys broken.
foundations.
seismic intensity scale used to evaluate the severity of ground shaking on the basis of observed
The scale was first proposed by Sergei Medvedev (USSR), Wilhelm Sponheuer (East
Germany), and Vít Kárník (Czechoslovakia) in 1964. It was based on the experiences being
available in the early 1960s from the application of the Modified Mercalli intensity scale and the
1953 version of the Medvedev scale, known also as the GEOFIAN scale.
With minor modifications in the mid-1970s and early 1980s, the MSK scale became widely
used in Europe and the USSR. In early 1990s, the European Seismological Commission (ESC)
used many of the principles formulated in the MSK in the development of the European Macro
seismic Scale, which is now a de facto standard for evaluation of seismic intensity in European
countries. MSK-64 is still being used in India, Israel, Russia, and throughout the Commonwealth
of Independent States. De facto: In law and government, de facto describes practices that exists in
reality, even if not officially recognized by the law. It is commonly used to refer to what happens
in practice, in contrast with “de jure”, which refers to things that happen according to the law.
Unofficial customs that are widely accepted are sometimes called de factor standards.
(MM) scale used in the United States. The MSK scale has 12 intensity degrees expressed in Roman
Felt indoors by many and felt outdoors only by very few. A few
IV. Largely Observed trembling or swaying of the building, room, bed, chair etc. China,
window panes break. Liquids oscillate and may spill from fully
their balance. Many people are frightened and run outdoors. Small
VI. Strong
objects may fall and furniture may be shifted. Dishes and glassware
ground.
8493-1439-1.
Dewey, James, B. Glen Reagor, L. Dengler, K. Moley (1995). Intensity Distribution and
Isoseismal Maps for the Northridge, California, Earthquake of January 17,1994, USGS
Retrieved 2017-04-09.
Omori, F. (1894). "On the aftershocks of earthquakes" (PDF). Journal of the College of
Richter, C.F., "Elementary Seismology", ed, Vol., W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco,
1956.
ISBN 0-07-137782-4.
Stover, C. W., and Coffman, J. L. (1993). Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989
2008-08-27.
Wood, H. O., and Neumann, Frank (1931). Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale of 1931: