Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Deacon Alexandrian of dark complexion, and short of stature that his enemies mocked him
calling him a dwarf. It was Athanasius, Secretary of Alexander, who would soon become one of
the central figures in the controversy, and the principal and most determined defender of the
Nicene faith. Early us is impossible to know exact birth of Athanasius, the date and place but it
seems to have been a small village or city of little importance on the banks of the Nile, around
the year 299. Post that talked about the Coptic, which was the language of the original
inhabitants of the region who had been conquered by the Greeks and the Romans, and since his
complexion was dark as the Copts, is very likely that he belonged to that group, and that
therefore their social origin is in the lower classes of the Egypt. Certainly, Athanasius never
culture. We also know that from date very early Athanasius related closely the monks of the
desert. Jerome tells us that our character the hermit gave a blanket to Paul. And the own
Athanasius, who wrote the life of San Antonio, said he used to visit this famous monk and wash
his hands. This last detail has made some think that child, Athanasius served to Antonio.
Although this is possible, we only have evidence of this, and it is therefore risky to make it. But
what is unquestionable is that through his life Athanasius had very close relations with the
monks of the desert, that more of that on more than one occasion they protected him against the
authorities, as we will see later. The monks, Athanasius learned a rigid discipline to his person,
and austerity that won him the admiration of his friends and at least the respect of their enemies.
Of all the opponents of Arianism, Athanasius was the scariest. And this, not because their logic
is more subtle - which wasn't it - or because his style was more grinding - that was not - nor
because Athanasius was endowed with great political skill - that was not - but because
Athanasius was close to town, and lived his faith and your religion without the subtleties of the
Arians and many other bishops of large venues pumps. His monastic discipline, its popular roots,
his fiery spirit and her deep conviction made him invincible. Even before exploding the Arian
controversy, Athanasius had written two works, one against the gentiles, and other approaches of
the incarnation of the word. There is nothing in these works of the speculations of Clemente or
origins. But there is a deep conviction that the central fact of the Christian faith, and all of human
history, is the incarnation of Jesus Christ. The presence of God in the midst of humanity, made
passage, Athanasius compares the incarnation to the visit of the Emperor in a city. The Emperor
decides to visit her, and takes residence one of the houses of the same. The result is that not only
this House, but throughout the city, receives an honor and special protection, in such a way that
the bandits do not dare to attack it. Similarly the monarch of the universe you've come to visit
our human city, living in one of our houses, and thanks to its presence in Jesus all we were
protected from attacks and Wiles of the evil one. Now, by virtue of that visit of God in Jesus
Christ, we are free to be what God He wants us to be, that is, beings capable of living in
As can be seen, the presence of God in history was the central element of Athanasius' faith - as it
has been for so many other Christians throughout the centuries. Therefore, it should not surprise
us that Athanasius saw in Arian doctrines a serious threat to the Christian faith. In effect, what
Arius said was that whoever came in Jesus Christ was not God himself, but an inferior being, a
creature. The Word was the first of God's creatures, but always a creature. Such opinions
Athanasius could not accept - as they could not accept the monks who had retired to the desert
for the love of God incarnate, nor the parishioners who met to participate in the liturgy that
Athanasius directed. For him, the Arian controversy was not a question of theological subtleties,
When Alexander, the bishop of Alexandria, became ill with death, all took it for granted that
Athanasius would be his successor. But Athanasius, who wanted to live quietly offering the
sacraments and worshiping with the people, retired to the desert. On his deathbed, Alejandro
sought him out, probably to let those present know that he wanted Atanasio to succeed him; but
Athanasius was not there. Finally, several weeks after the death of Alexander, and against the
wishes of Athanasius himself, the young pastor was elected bishop of Alexandria. It was the year
328, and that same year Emperor Constantine lifted the sentence of exile against Arius. Arianism
Eusebio de Nicomedia and the other Arian leaders knew that Athanasius was one of his most
fearsome enemies. Therefore, they soon began to do everything possible to destroy him,
circulating rumors in the sense that he practiced magic, and that he tyrannized his subjects
among the Christians of Egypt. At last Constantine ordered him to appear before a council
meeting in Tire, where he would have to answer serious charges. In particular, he was accused of
having killed a certain Arsenio, bishop of a rival sect, and having cut off his hand to use it in
magical rites. Athanasius went to Tire, as he was ordered, and after hearing the accusation
against him was made to introduce a man in the room covered with a large blanket. After making
sure that several of those present knew Arsenio, he revealed the face of the hooded man, and his
accusers were confused when they recognized the bishop who had supposedly been killed. Soon,
however, someone said that although Athanasius had not killed Arsenio, he had cut off his hand.
At the insistence of the assembly, Athanasius discovered one of Arsenio's hands, and showed
that it was intact. "It was the other!" Shouted some of those present, who had allowed themselves
to be persuaded by the rumors thrown by the Arians. Then Athanasius showed that Arsenio's
other hand was also in place, and in a sarcastic tone asked: "Tell me, what kind of monster do
you think Arsenio is, that he has three hands?" At these words, some broke into laughter, others
could not help but say that the Arians had deceived them. The council ended in the most
The bishop of Alexandria took this opportunity to present his case before the emperor. He went
to Constantinople and one day he jumped before the emperor's horse, held him by the bridle, and
did not release him until Constantine promised to give him an audience. Perhaps due to the
influence of Eusebio de Nicomedia in the court such methods were necessary. But anyone who
knew Constantine would know that in that action the young bishop had earned both the
emperor's respect and hatred. When some time later Eusebius of Nicomedia told Constantine that
Athanasius had boasted of being able to stop the shipments of wheat from Alexandria to
Constantinople, Constantine believed what the Arian bishop told him, and ordered that
But shortly after Constantino died - after being baptized by Eusebio de Nicomedia - and
succeeded by his three sons Constantino II, Constant and Constantius. The three brothers, after
the slaughter of all their relatives that we have referred to earlier, decided that all the bishops
who were exiled for their opposition to Arianism could return to their headquarters, and
Athanasius could return from exile.
But the return of Athanasius to Alexandria was not the end, but the beginning of a lifetime of
struggles and repeated exiles. In Alexandria there were some who supported the Arians, and who
now said that Athanasius was not the legitimate bishop of that city. Who claimed to be entitled to
this position was a certain Gregorio, Arian, who had the support of the government. Since
Athanasius did not want to give him the churches, Gregory decided to take them by force, and
consequently such outrages occurred that Athanasius decided that, in order to avoid further
outrages and desecrations, it was better that he leave the city and he will leave the field free to
Gregorio. However, when he arrived at the port and tried to obtain passage, he discovered that
the governor had prohibited him from leaving the city, or that he be offered passage to do so. At
last he managed to convince one of the ship's captains to take him secretly from the port of
The exile of Athanasius in Rome was fruitful, as both the Nicaeans and the Arians had asked the
Bishop of Rome, Julius, to lend their support. Now the presence of Athanasius greatly
contributed to the triumph of the Nicene cause in that city, and at last a synod assembled in it
declared that Athanasius was the legitimate bishop of Alexandria, and that Gregory was a
usurper. Although for the time being, given the political situation, this did not mean that
Athanasius could return to Alexandria, it did mean that the Western Church lent him his moral
support, with which Gregorio could no longer count. Finally, after a long series of negotiations,
Constant, who had remained the only emperor in the West after the death of his brother
Constantine II, appealed to his other brother, Constantius, who ruled in the East, to be allowed to
Since at that time Constantius had reason to try to win the friendship of his brother, he agreed to
the latter's requests, and once again Athanasius was able to return to Alexandria.
The excesses of Gregory in Alexandria had been such that the people now received Athanasius
as a hero or a deliverer. The people threw themselves into the street to cheer him up. And the
monks came down from the desert to welcome him. Faced with such signs of Athanasius'
popularity, his enemies dared not attack him directly for some time, and Athanasius and the
church of Alexandria enjoyed a period of relative tranquility that lasted for about ten years,
during which Atanasius strengthened his alliances with others. Orthodox bishops through a large
But the Emperor Constantius was determined Arian, and was willing to get rid of the champion
of the Nicene faith. While Constantius lived, Constantius did not dare to attack Athanasius
openly. Then a certain Magnentius tried to usurp the western throne, and Constantius was forced
Finally, in the year 353, Constancio felt strong enough to give free rein to his proarrian policy.
By force he was forcing all the bishops to accept the Arian doctrine. It is said that when he
ordered a group of bishops to condemn Athanasius, they replied that they could not do so, since
the canons of the church prohibited the condemnation of someone without giving him an
opportunity to defend himself. To this the emperor replied indignantly: "My will is also a canon
of the church." In view of such an attitude on the part of the emperor, many bishops signed the
condemnation of Athanasius, and those who refused to do so were sent into exile.
In the meantime, Constantius did his best to drive Athanasius away from Alexandria, where he
was too popular. He wrote him a letter saying that he was willing to grant him the hearing he had
asked for. But Athanasius answered very politely that there had been some error, for he had not
requested an audience with the emperor, and that in any case he did not want to waste his lord's
time. The emperor then ordered to concentrate in Alexandria all the legions available nearby,
fearing that there would be an uprising. Once the troops were available, the governor ordered
Atanasio, in the name of the emperor, to leave the city. Athanasius replied by showing him the
old written order in which Constantius gave him permission to return to Alexandria, and told the
governor that there must certainly be some mistake, for the emperor could not contradict himself
in that way.
Shortly thereafter, when Athanasius was celebrating communion in one of his churches, the
governor had the temple surrounded, and suddenly burst into the sanctuary in front of a group of
armed soldiers. The tumult was enormous, but Athanasius did not flinch, but ordered the faithful
to sing Psalm 136: "For his mercy endureth for ever." The soldiers made their way through the
crowd, while some sang and others tried to escape. Around Athanasius the shepherds who were
present formed a circle. Athanasius refused to flee until he made sure that his flock was safe. In
the end, in the midst of the tumult, Athanasius fainted, and it was then that his clerics took
advantage of him to sneak him out of the church and put him to safety.
From then on, Athanasius appeared to be a ghost. Everywhere he was sought; but the authorities
could not find him. What had happened was that he had taken refuge among the desert monks.
These monks had ways of communicating with each other, and each time the emperor's officers
approached the bishop's hiding place, they simply moved him to another monastery. For five
years Athanasius lived among the desert monks. And during those five years the Nicene cause
suffered rough blows. The imperial policy was no longer hidden in its support for the Arians.
By force, several synods declared themselves in favor of Arianism. In the end, even the old
Osius of Cordoba and the Bishop of Rome, Liberius, signed confessions of Arian faith. Although
there were many bishops and other ecclesiastical leaders who had convinced themselves that
Arianism was not acceptable, it was difficult to oppose him when the state so decidedly
supported him. Finally a council meeting in Sirmium promulgated what was later called "the
blasphemy of Sirmium," which was a document that openly rejected the faith proclaimed at the
Council of Nicaea.
Unexpectedly Constantius died, and Julian the apostate succeeded him. Since Julian had no
interest in supporting one or the other of the two sides in contention, he simply ordered that all
exile orders issued against the bishops be canceled. Julian's purpose was that the two sides bleed
each other, while he went ahead with his program to restore paganism. But in any case the result
of Juliano's advent to power was that Athanasius was able to return to Alexandria and engage in
During his years of struggle, Athanasius had realized that the reason why many opposed the
Nicene Creed was that they feared that the claim that the Son was of the same substance as the
Father could be understood as meaning that there is no distinction some between the Father and
the Son. For that reason, some preferred to say, instead of "of the same substance", "of such
substance". The two Greek words are homousios (of the same substance) and homoiusios (of
such substance). The Council of Nicea had said that the Son was homousious with the Father.
Now some said that, although the declaration of the Council seemed dangerous to them, they
were willing to affirm that the Son was homoiusios with the Father.
Earlier, Athanasius would have insisted exclusively on the Nicene formula, and declared that
those who insisted on saying "of such a substance" were as heretics as the Arians. But now, after
several years of experience, the old bishop of Alexandria was willing to see the legitimate
concern of these Christians who, while not wanting to be Arians, were not willing to completely
abandon any distinction between the Father and the Son, for that distinction was found in the
Bible and had been the doctrine of the church from its very beginnings.
Now, through a whole series of negotiations, Athanasius approached these Christians, and made
them see that the Nicene formula could be interpreted in such a way as to do justice to the
concerns of those who preferred to say "of such substance." Finally, at a synod gathered in
Alexandria in the year 362, Athanasius and his followers declared that it was acceptable to speak
of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit as "a substance" (a "hypostasis"), as long as this was
not understood as if there were no distinction between the three, and also as "three substances"
(three "hypostases"), as long as this was not understood as if there were three gods.
On the basis of this understanding, the majority of the church met again in support of the Council
of Nicaea, until, as we shall see later, the Second Ecumenical Council, meeting in Constantinople
in 381, ratified the Nicene doctrine. But Atanasio would not live to see the final triumph of the
Although Julian had proposed not to persecute the Christians, they soon began to disturb the
news that came to him from Alexandria. In other cities the restoration of paganism marched
more or less slowly. But in Alexandria it was not going. In fact, the bishop of that city, while he
was dedicated to healing the wounds caused by the long years of controversy, was also dedicated
to strengthening the church. His prestige was such that Julian's programs were unsuccessful.
Moreover, the old bishop was openly opposed to the designs of the emperor, and that opposition
inspired the masses. In view of all this, Julian decided to send Athanasius to a new exile.
After a series of episodes that need not be told here, it was clear that Julian wanted Athanasius to
leave, not only Alexandria, but also Egypt. Athanasius was forced to accede to the first, since in
the city there was not really where to hide. But he decided to remain in Egypt, hidden once more
among the monks. To avoid this, the Imperial soldiers were ordered to arrest him. It was then
when the boat, faster, was approaching, leading to the soldiers who were pursuing him. "Have
you seen Atanasio? "Shouted the other boat. "Yes," Athanasius answered truthfully, "go ahead of
you, and if you hurry you will catch up." At this news, the officer ordered that the paddlers hurry
the pace, and soon left Athanasius and his family behind.
As we have seen, however, Julian's reign did not last long. Upon his death Jovian succeeded him,
who, in addition to being tolerant of all sides in dispute, felt a deep admiration for Athanasius.
Once again the Alexandrian bishop was called from exile, although he could not remain in his
see for a long time before the new emperor called him to Antioch, so that the famous bishop
would instruct him about the true faith. When Athanasius finally returned to Alexandria,
everything seemed to indicate that his long chain of exile had come to an end.
But he still had one more Atanasio, because after a few months Jovian died and his successor,
Valente, declared himself defender of the Arians. For various reasons there were riots in
Alexandria, and Athanasius, fearing that the new emperor would blame him for those riots, and
to try to take revenge on the faithful of the city, decided to retire once more. But it soon became
clear that Valente, while doing everything possible to restore the preponderance of Arianism,
would not dare to touch the venerable Bishop of Alexandria. The experiences of Constantius and
Julian were enough to show him that little Athanasius was a giant whom it was better to leave
alone.
Therefore, Athanasius could remain in Alexandria, pastoring his flock, until death claimed him
in the year 373.
Athanasius never saw the final triumph of the Nicene cause. But whoever reads his works will
realize that his conviction of the justice of that cause was such that he always confided that,
before or after his death, the Nicene faith would prevail. In fact, after the first fights, Athanasius
began to see around him, in various regions of the empire, other giants that began to rise for the
same cause.