Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/257568751

Napoleon A. Chagnon: Noble Savages: My Life Among Two Dangerous Tribes


— The Yanomamö and the Anthropologists

Article  in  Human Ecology · June 2013


DOI: 10.1007/s10745-013-9585-9

CITATION READS

1 648

1 author:

Lee Cronk
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
68 PUBLICATIONS   1,361 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Lee Cronk on 20 February 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Hum Ecol
DOI 10.1007/s10745-013-9585-9

Napoleon A. Chagnon: Noble Savages: My Life Among Two


Dangerous Tribes — The Yanomamö and the Anthropologists
New York: Simon and Schuster, 2013. ISBN: 0684855100

Lee Cronk

# Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

In the spring of 1982, I took a course taught by the famous the many challenges he has faced not only there but also
Napoleon Chagnon. He had recently arrived at Northwest- among his own colleagues.
ern University, and I was about to graduate, so as far as I The book consists mainly of an account of Chagnon’s
knew at the time it would be my last opportunity to learn fieldwork among the Yanomamö, written in a much more
something about this man who even then was a living compelling, personal, and less technical style than his pre-
legend within the discipline of anthropology. The subject vious work on the topic, Studying the Yanomamö (Chagnon
matter of the course was political anthropology, and al- 1974). He describes his culture shock upon first arriving
though the required readings by such leaders in the field as among the Yanomamö, his efforts to learn their language,
F. G. Bailey and Morton Fried were certainly stimulating, and his daily struggles with the facts of life in a wet, tropical
the best part of each class was always Chagnon’s fascinating environment. The result is what might be called “serious
accounts of life among the Yanomamö. One day, he began fun.” While there is plenty in the book that is deadly (and I
to tell a story about a man named Wide Asshole. Before he mean that literally) serious, there is also a healthy dose of
had gotten very far, one of my fellow students burst out: Chagnon’s trademark, self-effacing humor. Consider, for
“Wait a minute. What kind of a parent names a kid ‘Wide example, how he describes himself after having settled in
Asshole’?” Without missing a beat, Chagnon turned to the and adopted local standards of personal hygiene: “I reeked
student and said, “Well, what kind of parent names a kid like a smoked jockstrap left to mildew in the bottom of a
Napoleon?” dark gym locker” (p. 24).
To those who don’t know him personally, Napoleon Although much of the book’s content will be familiar to
Chagnon is larger-than-life, an iconoclastic anthropologist readers of Chagnon’s other books on the Yanomamö, it also
whose work is admired by many and reviled by a few. In contains a considerable amount of information that has not
contrast, that episode from a class more than 30 years ago been previously published. Most of this concerns the lives
sums up the Napoleon Chagnon that I know: Quick-witted, and deaths of Yanomamö women, including information
self-deprecating, wonderful with students, and, without a about female infanticide, female sexuality, and abduction.
doubt, anthropology’s leading expert on the Yanomamö of Much is also revealed regarding the political situation in
Venezuela and Brazil. The best and most important thing I Venezuela generally and at his field site in particular, in-
can say about Chagnon’s memoir Noble Savages is that this cluding some deeply shocking revelations about some of the
is the same Napoleon Chagnon that comes through in its Salesian missionaries who have worked there. Chagnon has
pages. The book is a pleasure to read, rich with new details also done an excellent job of incorporating material from
about Chagnon, his fieldwork among the Yanomamö, and other sources, such as Helena Valero’s account of her ab-
duction and subsequent captivity among the Yanomamö
(Biocca 1996) and Mark Ritchie’s (1996) description of
the life of a Yanomamö shaman.
L. Cronk (*)
There are many ways to judge the quality of an ethnog-
Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University,
New Brunswick, NJ, USA raphy. However, most of them depend on what the reader is
e-mail: lcronk@anthropology.rutgers.edu hoping to learn about a particular society – its religion, its
Hum Ecol

economy, and so on. One metric that can be applied to any Neel in a now notorious book called Darkness in El Dorado,
ethnography is simply how open and revealing it is regard- does not make an appearance until near the end of the
ing the sources of its claims about a group of people: Who book. Given how much of Chagnon’s time has been
wrote it? How did he or she choose to study a particular wasted over the past decade or so defending himself
group? What methods of data collection were used? What against Tierney’s accusations, one might expect Chagnon
challenges to data collection had to be overcome? How and to spend more time on the topic. But the accusations have
within what theoretical framework were the data analyzed? been proven wrong, the American Anthropological Associ-
These “ethnographic text formation processes” are analo- ation has retracted its report on the matter, and Chagnon is
gous to archaeological site formation processes. Just as clearly ready to move on from what a period that he
archaeologists need to a deep understanding of how their describes as being like “a blurry bad dream” (p. 450). It
sites were formed – erosion patterns, the actions of is to be hoped that the rest of the discipline of anthropol-
burrowing animals, sedimentation, and so on – so do con- ogy will follow his example while also never again
sumers of ethnographies need clear information regarding allowing itself to be so distracted and misled by such
how they came to exist (Cronk 1998). Unfortunately, many outrageous falsehoods. Not only anthropologists but also
ethnographers pay little attention to this aspect of their all other scientists must realize that witch hunts, lynch
writing, preferring instead to present their conclusions as mobs, and vigilantism have no place in scholarship.
faits accomplis, providing little information about how they Readers who do want to know more about the Tierney
arrived at them. In contrast, not only Noble Savages but also episode would do well to read not only Noble Savages but
the various editions of Chagnon’s monograph (Chagnon also Thomas Gregor and Daniel Gross' (2004) and Alice
2012) and his fieldwork account Studying the Yanomamö Dreger’s (2011) analyses of how the matter was handled by
(Chagnon 1974) are exemplary in this regard. Chagnon was the AAA.
reflexive before it was fashionable, always making it abun- At the end of that course back in 1982, Chagnon took me
dantly clear to his readers who he is as a person, how he aside and asked me whether I had considered going into an-
interacted with the Yanomamö, and how he collected and thropology. If I remember correctly, his exact words were
analyzed his data. Future generations of scholars will have something along the lines of “Anthropology needs people like
little trouble understanding not only how the Yanomamö of you!” I had indeed considered it, and, after earning a Master’s at
the late twentieth century lived their lives but also how we Wisconsin, I returned to Northwestern to work with Chagnon
came to know so much about them. and his long-time friend and collaborator William Irons on my
Given the book’s subtitle (“My Life Among Two Ph.D. Although Chagnon left my committee when he moved to
Dangerous Tribes — The Yanomamö and the Anthro- the University of California at Santa Barbara, we remained in
pologists”), readers might expect those two tribes to touch, and eventually he, Irons, and I edited a volume of essays
receive more or less equal time in Noble Savages. together (Cronk et al. 2000). All this is my way of acknowl-
Fortunately, that is not the case: The Yanomamö receive edging the fact that Napoleon Chagnon has had an enormous,
much more attention than do anthropologists, who be- positive impact on my life and my career. The discipline of
come prominent only in the book’s later chapters. Early anthropology also must acknowledge its own debt to Chagnon.
on, however, Chagnon does foreshadow the problems he A good way to begin this process would be for anthropologists
was to face later in his career as a result of his honesty and their students to read and learn from his memoir, Noble
regarding the data he had collected. For example, he Savages. I highly recommend it.
quotes University of Michigan anthropologist Norma
Diamond as advising him against honestly reporting
his findings: “We shouldn’t say that native people have
warfare and kill each other. People will get the wrong References
impression” (p. 30). This is essentially an abbreviated
form of the reaction many anthropologists had to his path- Biocca, E. (1996). Yanomama: The Story of Helena Valero, a Girl
breaking 1988 article in Science showing that Yanomamö men Kidnapped by Amazonian Indians, [As told to Ettore Biocca.]
who had participated in the killing of another person (unokais) Kodansha International, New York. [First English translation,
1970, E. P. Dutton.].
had higher marital and reproductive success than men who Chagnon, N. A. (1974). Studying the Yanomamö. Holt, Rinehart, and
had not done so (Chagnon 1988). Chagnon argues – persua- Winston, New York.
sively, in my opinion – that his data were solid and that his Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life Histories, Blood Revenge, and Warfare in
findings were valid. a Tribal Population. Science 239: 985–992.
Chagnon, N. A. (2012). Yanomamö, 6th ed. Wadsworth, Belmont.
I was particularly relieved to discover that the odious Patrick Cronk, L. (1998). Ethnographic Text Formation Processes. Social
Tierney (2001), a self-described journalist who flung false and Science Information/ Information sur les Sciences Sociales 37(2):
horrifying accusations at Chagnon and his collaborator James 321–349.
Hum Ecol

Cronk, L., Chagnon, N. A., and Irons, W. (eds.) (2000). Adaptation and Investigation of Darkness in El Dorado. American Anthropologist
Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. Aldine de 106(4): 687–698.
Gruyter, Hawthorne. Ritchie, M. A. (1996). Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamö Shaman
Dreger, A. (2011). Darkness’ Descent on the American Anthropological Story. Island Lake Press, Chicago.
Association: A Cautionary Tale. Human Nature 22(3): 225–246. Tierney, P. (2001). Darkness in El Dorado. How Scientists and
Gregor, T. A., and Gross, D. R. (2004). ‘Guilt by Association’: The Culture Journalists Devastated the Amazon. W. W. Norton, New
of Accusation and the American Anthropological Association’s York.

View publication stats

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi