Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Genosa Case
Aggravating circumstances
Act were committed:
Bucal v Bucal
It should be emphasized that Cherith had already been issued a PPO.
Tldr;
RTC issued visitation rights sa gagong accused eh may naissue na PPO sa victim.
SC: Conflicting ang visitation rights at PPO (permanent protection order) Grave
abuse of discretion, invalid ung visitational rights
Dinamling v People
Accused publicly accused his wife of being a whore, and brought several sex
partners to their dwelling. Victim suffered miscarriage as a consequence.
Dolina v Vallecera
Since Dolina’s demand for support for her son is based on her claim that he is
Vallecera’s illegitimate child, the latter is not entitled to such support if he
had not acknowledged him, until Dolina shall have proved his relation to him.
AAA v BBB
It is necessary, for Philippine courts to have jurisdiction when the abusive
conduct or act of violence was committed outside Philippine territory, that the
victim be a resident of the place where the complaint is filed in view of the
anguish suffered being a material element of the offense. In the present scenario,
the offended wife and children of respondent husband are residents of Pasig City
since March of 2010. Hence, the RTC of Pasig City may exercise jurisdiction over
the case.