Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Case 3:17-cv-03597-EMC Document 285 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 3

..

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 OPTICURRENT, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-03597-EMC


8 Plaintiff,
VERDICT FORM
9 V.

10 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., et al. ,


11 Defendants.

ro 12
~
0~
·a 13
-
u..... ·-ro
.~ u 14 When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please follow
!::J4-<
Vl 0
ou
·-
Vl
Q)
.....
ro .....
1-<
.....
Vl
15 the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous.

..... 0 16 Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Jury
~Q) aQ)
:::: ...c: 17 Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of
r:: t
::::::> 0
z 18 any legal term that appears in the questions below.

19 We, the Jury, unanimously find as follows :

20 I. DIRECT INFRINGEMENT

21 1. Has Opticurrent proven that it is more likely than not that Power Integrations literally

22 infringes claim 1 of the '623 patent? (A "YES" answer is a finding for Opticurrent. A "NO"

23 answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)

24

25 /
YES - - - NO - - -

26
lfyour answer to question 1 is "YES," go to Question 3. If your answer to question 1
27 is "NO," go to Question 2.
28
Case 3:17-cv-03597-EMC Document 285 Filed 02/25/19 Page 2 of 3

II. INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS

2 2. Has Opticurrent proven that it is more likely than not that the accused products infringe

3 under the Doctrine of Equivalents? (A "YES" answer is a finding for Opticurrent. A "NO" answer

4 is a finding for Power Integrations.) If you answered "YES" in Question 1, you may skip this

5 question.

7 YES _ __
/ NO - - -

9 III. INDUCING INFRINGEMENT

10 3. Has Opticurrent proven that it is more likely than not that Power Integrations induces

11 infringement of claim 1 of the ' 623 patent? (A "YES" answer is a finding for Opticurrent. A

(lj 12 "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)


t: .......
E
o..s
:;j
13
U:.:::
.....
.~
~
Cl)
u
(lj

........
0
14 YES _ __ No_L_
i:St>
.......
Cl) 1-o
15
II) .....
..... Cl)
(lj .......
..... Cl
(/)
16 IV. FINDINGS ON DAMAGES (IF APPLICABLE)
"0
II)
E
II)
.~ ...t:: 17 If you answered "YES" to any of Questions 1-3, proceed to answer the remaining
s:: t:
::J 0
z 18 questions. If you answered "NO" to all Questions 1-3, then do not answer the remaining

19 questions and proceed to check and sign the verdict form.

20 4. What has Opticurrent proved it is entitled to as a reasonable royalty:

21

22 (a) on-going royalty payment of (1) $ _ _ _ [per unit sold] or (2) 3 % of sales

23 (through March 31, 2018) of _ _ _ units (if(l)) or$ (if(2)),

24 OR .f'O(g( ~ l :t...l~ /f''/. 00


25 (b) one-time payment of$ _ _ _ for the life of the patent.

26

27 You have now reached the end ofthe verdict form and should review it to ensure it

28 accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. Please have the jury foreperson sign and date
2
Case 3:17-cv-03597-EMC Document 285 Filed 02/25/19 Page 3 of 3

the verdict form below. The jury foreperson should then notify the Courtroom Deputy that you

2 have reached a verdict. The jury foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring

3 it when the Jury is brought back into the courtroom.

4
5
6 Dated:

7
8
9
10
11

ell 12
§ ·a
o..s 13
U:..:::
...... ell
.~
,be.;...
u 14
Cll 0
Cit>
·t::
Cl)
15
(I) ......
...... Cll
ell ......
.... C) 16
~(I) E
(I)
·"'t::= ..c:: 17
t:
~ 0
z 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3