TERABIT Expanding Regional Connectivity in Asia and The Pacific

Expanding Regional Connectivity in
Asia and the Pacific:
I. Broadband Markets: State-of-Play

II. International Network Vulnerabilities
III. Terrestrial Infrastructure Initiatives,
Opportunities, and Challenges
Michael Ruddy
Director of International Research
Terabit Consulting
www.terabitconsulting.com
Part 1:
Broadband State of Play
in Hub Markets
Broadband State of Play in 5 “Hub” Markets
ESCAP Subregion Market
East and Northeast Asia China

South and Southwest Asia India
North and Central Asia Russia
The Pacific Australia
Southeast Asia Singapore
China
• China shows the strongest prospects for growth in
the region
– China is already the world’s largest broadband market,
having surpassed the US in 2008
– Currently 10x more fixed-broadband subscribers than
India
– Fixed-broadband subscribers will exceed 200 million by
2014
– 1.4 Tbps of international demand as of year-end 2011
• In terms of international bandwidth demand, still
trailing Japan (>2 Tbps) for the time being
China: Broadband Targets
• 12th Five-Year Plan calls for broadband speeds to
increase to 20 Mbps in urban areas and 4 Mbps
in rural areas by the end of 2015
– More than 8m fiber kilometers deployed; robust
FTTx market of 25m+ (although DSL still dominant)
• Ministry of Industry and Information Technology
indicated intention to lower broadband access
pricing
• ARPU of US$11 per month, while comparatively
low, should still allow for investment in 4G
networks
India
• Extremely promising broadband growth, but timing uncertain
• 3G service launch was marred by weak coverage, incompatible
handsets, and “bill shock”
– Watching 1-hour sporting event on 3G = 300 INR ($5)
• Reliance planning nationwide $10 bil 4G rollout
– But some foreign 3G/4G investors have pulled out of market, citing
“regulatory uncertainty”
• Fixed-broadband market: 100Mbps VPON FTTH service launched in
2011
– However, affordable packages were limited to 2Mbps (and 8GB/mo).
Unlimited 100Mbps was priced at $1,500
• India’s middle- and upper-class ($4k+/household/yr.), while growing,
is less than 20% of population
• ‘In-between class’ ($1k-$4k/household/yr.) has remained steady at
more than 60% of population ==> greatest growth potential
Russia
• Total international bandwidth reported to be as high as 2
Tbps as of year-end 2011
• Demand is largely westward - only a small percentage of
international demand is routed through Russia’s east
• Russian Internet content market is not yet mature
– Localization of western content prevails
• Russian-language content, combined with westward
international connectivity, makes Russia a hub for traffic
from CIS countries
• Much of the country’s terrestrial fiber investment has
focused on the China-Russia route in order to capture
Europe-Asia transit
– One China-Russia network operator claims that it has been able
to charge a premium of up to 300% for low-latency routes
Australia
• $40 billion Australian National Broadband Network
(NBN) underway
– More than 3.5 million residences and businesses set to
be connected by fiber by 2015
– FTTx connectivity serving more than 90 percent of the
population by 2021
– 1 Gbps target speed to the home
– Potential to be severely disruptive technology
• Limited number of carriers in Australia/New
Zealand (i.e. Telstra, Optus, TNZ, and Vodafone
Hutchison) has led to limited deployment of
international infrastructure
– Could prove an obstacle to the NBN’s success
Singapore
• Population of 5 mil but serves as important transit
hub for southeast Asia
• Approaching 2 Tbps of international Internet
bandwidth; very high growth continues
• Next Gen NBN nationwide broadband buildout
• Approximately half of market controlled by Singtel
– #2: StarHub
– #3: MobileOne
• International demand mixed between Chinese-
language content, English-language destinations,
India, Malaysia, and Indonesia
Part 2:
International Network Vulnerabilities
FLAG Europe-Asia (1997)
Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

© 2012 Terabit Consulting
99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)

FFLAG Europe-Asia (1997)
99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)
Seacom (2009)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)
Seacom (2009)
I-Me-We (2010)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)
Seacom (2009)
I-Me-We (2010)
Europe-India Gateway (2011)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)
Seacom (2009)
I-Me-We (2010)
Gulf Bridge International (2012)

99
Sea-Me-We-3 (1999)
i2i (2002)
SAFE (2002)
TGN-TIC (2004)
Sea-Me-We-4 (2005)
Falcon (2006)
Seacom (2009)
I-Me-We (2010)
Gulf Bridge International (2012)
MENA (2012)
UNDERSEA CABLE CHOKE POINTS AFFECTING ASIA
Strait of Sicily (145km) and the Mediterranean
Luzon Strait (250km)
Egypt, the Red Sea, and Bab-el-Mandeb (30km)
Strait of Malacca (3km)

Part 3:
Terrestrial Infrastructure Initiatives,
Opportunities, and Challenges
Carrier-Operated Terrestrial Networks:
Challenges
• High construction costs make it difficult for
terrestrial networks to compete head-to-head on
those routes that are already efficiently served by
submarine cables
– e.g. the China-India (Yadong-Siliguri) path crosses
difficult, mountainous terrain and still only serves a
narrow point-to-point market
• Carriers often overprice capacity on their domestic
portions of the network
• Very difficult to establish and maintain end-to-end
network performance matrices
• Carriers often wary of purchasing capacity on cable
operated by a competitor
Obstacles to the Democratization of
Bandwidth
• The majority of broadband deployment in Asia is in
coastal and urban areas
• Markets without coastlines or with lower
population density are increasingly falling behind
• Many multi-national terrestrial fiber optic networks
are structured to allow operators with submarine
cable hubs to profit from interconnection
– Landlocked or underserved coastal nations become
dependent upon larger coastal markets
• Pricing of international bandwidth in Asia remains
expensive throughout the region
IP Transit Remains Extremely Expensive
Throughout Asia
• Compare to less than $5/Mbps in USA

Terrestrial Networks as
a Complement to Undersea Cables
• Asian nations experience some of the highest rates of Internet
downtime in the world due to dependence on a handful of
submarine cables
• Up to 90% of international capacity purchased on submarine
cables in Asia is unprotected – customers are therefore
desperate for terrestrial redundancy options within Asia, but
affordable, coherent terrestrial solutions are rare
• Secondary markets need more options: e.g. Mumbai, as
South Asia’s primary undersea gateway, serves as the only
logical IP transit hub for most South Asia Association for
Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries
• Terrestrial networks can offer lower latency on some routes
– Increasingly important for search engines, which report higher click-
through rates when latency is lower
Nature of Asian Bandwidth Demand
• As of 2012, approximately 50% of Asian

international traffic is intraregional
• Vast majority of the region’s traffic is routed via
undersea cable
– e.g. Only about 10% of Asia-Europe traffic is
currently routed terrestrially
Characterizing Terrestrial Deployment in Asia
• Six important categories of terrestrial fiber optic
deployment:
– Asia-to-Europe and China-Russia transit networks
– Subregional initiatives
– Southeast Asian multi-national networks
– China-India cables
– New West Asia/Middle East Networks
– Other transborder (bilateral) links
Asia-to-Europe and
China-Russia Transit Networks
• Trans Asia Europe (TAE)
– Conceived in 1990s; very low capacity; missing trans-Caspian links
• China-Russia Networks
– Trans Europe Asia (TEA) (Rostelecom) (Upgraded to 200 Gbps in
2012)
– Europe-Russia-Asia (ERA) / China-Russia-2 / Eurasia Highway
(TransTeleCom)
– Europe-Russia-Mongolia-China (ERMC) via Mongolia Railway
(2004)
– Europe-Kazakhstan-Asia (EKA) / Information Silk Road
• Trans Eurasian Information Superhighway (TASIM)
– Frankfurt-Hong Kong
– China, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey (Including trans-
Caspian link)
• LION pan-regional network along Asian Highway ROW
– Defer to Abu Saeed Khan’s presentation
Subregional Initiatives
• Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Information

Superhighway
– Cambodia, China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam
– Supported by Asian Development Bank
• South Asian Subregion Economic Cooperation
(SASEC) Information Superhighway
– Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal
– Supported by Asian Development Bank
Southeast Asian Multi-National Networks
• China-Southeast Asia Cable (CSC) (2001)

– China, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Malaysia,
Singapore
• Also Greater Mekong Subregion Information
Superhighway
• Thailand-Cambodia-Vietnam-Hong Kong
(2012-2013)
– TCC (Thailand), VTI/VNPT (Vietnam), NTC
(Cambodia), DHT (Hong Kong)
China-India Networks
• China-India Networks
– China-India Cable / Another Gateway to India (AGI)
(China Telecom)
– China-India (China Unicom)
New West Asia/Middle East Networks
• Europe-Persia Express Gateway (EPEG)

• Regional Cable Network (RCN)
• Jeddah-Amman-Damascus-Istanbul (JADI)
• Egypt-Jordan-Saudi Arabia
• EPEG/RCN/JADI designed to bypass Egypt;
however, sanctions prevent American
operators from participating in projects
passing through Iran or Syria
Notable Transborder (Bilateral) Links
• Bhutan-India (2009)
• Myanmar-China (2008)
• Afghanistan to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan
(2009)
• Laos-Cambodia (2010)
• Cambodia-Vietnam (2012)
• Bangladesh-Myanmar and Bangladesh-India
(2012-2013)
• China-Pakistan (Karakoram Highway/Khunjerab
Pass) (2012-2013)
Conclusions
• Bold, next-generation domestic broadband initiatives are underway
throughout the region
– each faces a variety of obstacles
• Undersea cable “choke points” pose a significant threat to Asia’s
network reliability
– and, by extension, its economic well-being
• Terrestrial networks are the logical solution for network redundancy
– however, they should be viewed as a ‘complement’ and not a
‘competitor’ to undersea networks
• Drawbacks of carrier-owned international terrestrial networks need
to be addressed
• Obstacles to the democratization of bandwidth need to be
overcome
• Significant progress has been made in the deployment of terrestrial
fiber optic infrastructure, but a more harmonized approach to
accessible multi-national connectivity is needed (e.g. LION)
Thank you!

TERABIT Expanding Regional Connectivity in Asia and The Pacific

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

TERABIT Expanding Regional Connectivity in Asia and The Pacific

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Expanding Regional Connectivity in

Asia and the Pacific:

I. Broadband Markets: State-of-Play

East and Northeast Asia China

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

Luzon Strait (250km)

Egypt, the Red Sea, and Bab-el-Mandeb (30km)

Strait of Malacca (3km)

Source: The Undersea Cable Report 2012

• Compare to less than $5/Mbps in USA

• As of 2012, approximately 50% of Asian

• Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Information

• China-Southeast Asia Cable (CSC) (2001)

• Europe-Persia Express Gateway (EPEG)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi