Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hypersegregation in the
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Hypersegregation
A. Evenness/Unevenness
B. Exposure/Isolation
C. Centralization
D. Clustering
E. Concentration
III. Conclusion
III. References
2
Mangrum
I. Introduction
I have visited Grand Rapids, Michigan several times. I love its rolling terrain and
cobbled downtown streets. My initial reason for going to Grand Rapids was because my
partner and I were looking for a place to vacation locally. After being stranded in New
Orleans, Louisiana during the chaos of the September 11, 2001 events, we though that this
was a better course of action. After vacationing in Grand Rapids a few times, I considered
moving there. Living there would afford me the luxury of residing in a metropolitan area that
did not have the population density of Chicago. My current employer has a railroad yard in
Grand Rapids, so I would not have to worry about finding a job. In addition, I would be 3 ½
To educate myself more about the area, I created a statistical profile and a
topographical map of Kent County with an emphasis on Grand Rapids. The map alone
yielded concern. Even though the Grand River runs right through Grand Rapids, I never
Figure 1
3
Mangrum
Even though I had no negative racial encounters when vacationing, living there is another
story. By compiling 2000 U.S. Census data for the Kent County area, I was able to calculate
the percent African American population for each census tract and also assess the level of
segregation for the entire county. Although, there are many races and ethnicities living in
Kent County, I chose to focus on the Black, White, and Hispanic population since they are the
largest groups of people in the area. My analysis yielded more than I expected to find. In
addition to the common patterns of residential segregation found in most U.S. urban areas, I
II. Hypersegregation
Social scientists specify three factors that cause residential segregation: economics,
discrimination, and preferences. Economics suggests that most minorities earn lower incomes
and posses less wealth than whites and therefore cannot afford to live in the same
Kent County, according to 2000 Census data, racial segregation occurred at all income and
wealth levels.
It has also been suggested that “segregation results from voluntary self-separation
Geography, 2nd Edition, 2009, p. 265) The conclusion that was drawn is that minorities
segregate themselves because they want to live close to members of their own group. The
Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality (MCSUI) conducted a study where they interviewed
thousands of people in Los Angeles, Boston, Detroit, and Atlanta. They asked wanted to
4
Mangrum
know what people wanted in terms of the racial composition of their neighborhoods. Their
research found that Blacks preferred neighborhoods that have a 50% Black and a 50% White
composition. Whites on the other hand, indicated that anything more than a minimal presence
clustering, and concentration. Douglas Massey and Nancy Denton, in 1988, did extensive
segregation numbers on at least four out of five forms. They found in an empirical
examination of 1980 U.S. Census data that “only African Americans were highly segregated
examination of the U.S. Census 2000 data for Kent County to uncover the forms of
segregation that African Americans may experience. The following explains in detail what I
found regarding the hypersegregation of African Americans in the Grand Rapids’ flood plain.
A. Evenness/Unevenness
neighborhoods. Put another way, given the current distribution of a group across
neighborhoods, what would be required to eliminate segregation? The most common measure
of the evenness interpretation of segregation is called the index of dissimilarity. The index
ranges from 0 to 100. 0 means no minorities would have to move. 100 mean all minorities
would have to move. Values between 0 and 30 are thought of as low segregation, values
between 30 and 70 are thought of as moderate, and values over 70 are thought of as high.
5
Mangrum
Figure 2
It is obvious to see in the map above the there is an uneven distribution of African
Americans in Kent County. The map is divided spatially by census tracts and the boundary of
the city is outlined in red. Most of the African American population of Kent County lives
within the city limits. There are 14 census tracts that are completely outside of city where
African Americans reside but in low percentages. The White populations, on the other hand,
6
Mangrum
in the same 14 tracts, have populations that are greater than 57.06%. Four census tracts are
both inside and outside the city. Two of these tracts have percent African American
population that is above 13.68%. The spatial analysis of the map shows the African American
population in the southwest quadrant of the county and really nowhere else.
Before the creation of maps and spatial analysis, an empirical analysis of census data
for Kent County needed to be done to calculate the index of dissimilarity for the county. I
calculated indices for African American, White, and Hispanic or Latino. I included the
Hispanic population numbers to show that each minority experiences a different level of
segregation in an area. I was surprised by my calculations. The index for African American
to White was 63.1. Even though 63.1 fall within the moderate range, it is in the high-
moderate range. The index for Hispanic to White was 54.0. This told me that even though
Hispanics experienced segregation, it was not on the level which African Americans suffered.
I also calculated the index for African American to Hispanic. This index was a moderate 52.0
and an indication that African Americans experience segregation even among other
minorities.
B. Exposure/Isolation
members live.” (Kaplan, Wheeler, Holloway, p. 263) The isolation index tells us on average
the percent of a group living in a particular area, in this case each Kent County census tract.
The tracts with the highest percent African American population are 28 through 34 and 35
through 37. These tracts have a percent African American population ranging from 42.7% to
85.64%. These tracts are within the city limits. Therefore, the majority of the African
Americans in the county are isolated within the city of Grand Rapids. When I calculated the
7
Mangrum
index for the county as a whole, the number was not as high as it was for each census tract.
The county scored 35%. When I expressed my findings in map form, the isolation is much
For a comparison, I calculated an isolation index for the White population. Their
index for the county was an astounding 86%. 59 out of the 126 census blocks were over 90%
Figure 3
8
Mangrum
C. Centralization
Kaplan, Wheeler, and Holloway describe centralization as “the degree to which group
members live close to the center of the city, relative to other groups.” (p. 263) In other
words, centralization is a measure of how close a group lives relative to the center of an urban
area. It is not hard to see in figure 2 that the majority of African Americans live in the
geographical center of Grand Rapids. The nine tracts that are grouped together each have an
African American population that is more than 29.37%. Five of the nine tracts are more than
57.0% African American. Tract 28, which shares its northern boundary with the downtown
business district, is 63.4% African American. In any event, sharing a boundary with the
downtown business district and being in the geographical heart of the city is about as
centralized as you can get. Centralization in the county does not apply here. It could be
assumed that outside of the southwest corner the county is rural. I personally saw the lay of
the land when vacationing. The area outside of the metropolitan area consists of forests,
D. Clustering
“Clustering is the degree to which group members live in neighborhoods that are close
together within the city.” (Kaplan, Wheeler, Holloway, p. 263) According to the U. S.
Census a high degree of clustering indicates a racial or ethnic enclave. (U. S. Census, 2009)
Figure 4 illustrates the clustering of African Americans in Grand Rapids. Grouped together
are census tracts 28 through 33 and 35 through 37. As discussed earlier, this group of nine
tracts is centralized and has the highest percentage of African Americans residents in the city.
In other words, these nine tracts make up the city’s black belt. (See Figure 4)
9
Mangrum
Figure 4
The definition of clustering, given by Massey and Denton (1988), specifies that the
group members live in neighborhoods that are in proximity to each other in the city. After
taking an additional look at figure 2, I see another pattern of clustering. Even though
10
Mangrum
Americans in the county. African Americans are clustered into the southwest portion of the
county. This is the only part of the county where African Americans make up more than
4.53% of a census tract. Outside of this quadrant, African Americans make up a scant percent
of the population. All of the tracts in this part of the county, where African Americans make
up more than 4.53% of the population, are spatially connected except for one. Census tract
one stands alone in the northern most part of the city. African Americans make up 5.3% of its
population. My assumption is African Americans may have been displaced there due to urban
revitalization or gentrification. Therefore, I conclude that the Grand Rapids metropolitan area
E. Concentration
urban space; that is, the extent to which the group lives in high-density settings.” (Kaplan,
Wheeler, Holloway, p. 263) Put in simpler terms, concentration refers to the amount of
physical space occupied by a minority group in a geographic area. Minority groups of the
same size, occupying less space, would be considered more concentrated and consequently
more segregated. The shapefile that I used to create the maps for this paper has an attribute
table that lists all relevant information for each tract. In this case, I examined the column
called “SQMILES”. This column lists the area of each tract in square miles. The tracts that
have the greatest area are rural. The city tracts have less area and contain on average more
people than the rural tracts. As of 2007, the population density of Grand Rapids was 4,333
people per square mile. (City-Data.com Website, 2009) The tract containing the greatest
percentage of African Americans (85.6%) has an area of 0.47 square miles. There are a total
of 5356 people in tract 32 which is equivalent to 11,395.7 people per square mile. Tract
11
Mangrum
120.02, which is the largest tract in the county, has an area of 64.89 square miles. It has 5,555
residents and is 96.3% White. Its calculated population density is 85.6 people per square
mile. Based on my empirical analysis, I can conclude that large percentages of African
Americans are concentrated in Kent County census tracts that are much smaller in area than
Figure 5
12
Mangrum
concentration was affected by poverty as well. It has been said that minorities have lower
incomes and possess less wealth than Whites and therefore cannot afford to live in the same
neighborhoods. The economic data that I collected from the census does not support this. In
fact, it suggests that racial segregation occurs at all income levels. In any event, research has
confirmed that urban African Americans have been “disproportionally affected by the spatial
The estimated per capita income in Grand Rapids in 2000 was $17,661.
(Wikipedia.com, 2009) The percentage of residents living in poverty in 2000 was 15.7%.
According to the Grand Rapids City-Data Website, the percentage of residents living in
poverty in 2007 was 22.7%: 12.7% for White Non-Hispanic residents and 45.5% for African
Americans. Using 2000 census population data, I calculated that roughly 16,500 of White
residents and 18,300 of African American residents were poor. Even though, there are more
than three times as many White residents in Grand Rapids than African American, the African
American poor outnumber the White poor. Based on my findings, the Grand Rapids’ black
belt can also be considered a ghetto because of the spatial concentration of the African
III. Conclusion
A group is hypersegregated when it has high segregation numbers on four of the five
segregation indices. The African Americans in Kent County, Michigan scored high on all
five indices. The first measure of unevenness is measured by the index of segregation. My
13
Mangrum
substantiate my math, I created a map to provide a spatial view of these calculations. The
map shows that the majority of the African American population resides within the city limits.
There are a few tracts outside of the city limits where African Americans live, but the percent
African American in those tracts are lower than the ones that are city bound.
The African American population is also within the geographical center of the city. It
is illustrated spatially in figure 4. Being isolated in the geographical center of the city
indicates that African Americans are centralized too. The nine tracts that are clustered
together in the center of the city form the city’s black belt. There is also a county black belt in
the southwest part of the county which includes the city black belt. These tracts in this
portion of the county are much smaller in area than those outside of it. These smaller census
tracts contain the highest percentages of African Americans in the county. Because of the
With all of the criteria for the five indices being met, it can be said that African
Americans are hypersegregated in the city and also the county. I previously thought of Grand
Rapids as an idea place to relocate to in the future. It was pleasing to the eye, had the
necessary amenities, and job opportunities. My analyses lead me to rethink this possible
move. With the city being as segregated as it is, where would or could I live? Would I be
steered into an area within the black belt? Has the racial segregation gap closed any in the
last ten years? With the Decennial Census less than a year away, I have time to process what
I have learned about the racial situation of African Americans in Grand Rapids, and make my
decision or at least perform another spatial and empirical analysis before making my final
decision.
14
Mangrum
References
Kaplan, David, Wheeler, James, Holloway, Steven (2009). Urban Geography, 2nd Edition.
grcity.us, Official Site of Grand Rapids, Michigan. (2009). Grand Rapids, Michigan.
United States Census Bureau. (2000). American Factfinder. Retrieved November 10, 2009,
from <http://www.census.gov>
Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. (2009). Grand Rapids, Michigan. Retrieved November 27,
15