Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press and International Center of Medieval Art are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Gesta.
http://www.jstor.org
The churches of Constantine constitute docu- case of recording what is available for the establishment
ments of unusual importance for a cultural and his- of this catalog.
torical interpretation of the first.Christian Roman em- A second significant problem is that of what is
peror and his age. They are also instructive for the meant by "Constantine's churches" or churches which
institutional and liturgical history of the church. Their Constantine "built." The catalog does not intend
number, location, size, design and decoration are all to include churches simply of Constantinian date, i.e.,
significant. This importance has been noted recently A.D. 312-337, but only those which received im-
by several historians,' yet there exists, to my know- perial patronage. Even here a distinction should be
ledge, no complete and up-to-date catalog of Con- drawn between churches which were actually founded
stantine's churches. In 1693 Joannes Ciampini, in his by Constantine's personal initiative and churches which
De sacris aedificiis a Constantino magno constructis, were merely endowed or subsidized by the imperial
recorded a total of 58 churches and baptisteries and fisc. Further distinctions may be drawn among the
two monasteries, but he obviously included many former group in respect to the degree of personal over-
legendary attributions, some of which he himself ques- sight and concern. Up to a point the available evidence
tioned. Such moder writers as Finegan and Kraut- permits us to make these distinctions, but it is like-
heimer provide descriptions of the major monu- wise probable that after 312 or 313 in the West and
ments,2 but they do not specifically seek to establish a 324 in the East almost every bishop would have sought
comprehensive catalog. The same holds true for the imperial support for new buildings and that in nearly
specialized studies of Ludwig Voelkl as well as the every case token support and perhaps more than token
biographies of Constantine. For this reason, the acknowledgment would have followed. We learn from
present study is directed simply at the establishment Eusebius, for example, that general instructions for
of a complete list of Constantine's church buildings. the restoration and enlargement of churches were is-
The problem of evidence is, of course, basic. sued by the emperor and that he built many unspecified
There is literary evidence from ancient and medieval churches, evidence which suggests a widespread prac-
writers for most of the churches, and it is cited below. tice of patronage.' A few such churches of certain
In some cases it is nearly contemporary, e.g., the early fourth century date are therefore included in this
Bordeaux Pilgrim and Eusebius;3 in others, it is 600 catalog.
to 1000 years later, e.g. the Patria of Pseudo-Codinus The arrangement of the catalog is geographical
and the Ecclesiastical History of Nicephorus Callistus. and chronological, the name of the city being followed
For the most part the testimony of writers later than by the name of the church and an approximate date.
the fifth and sixth-century historians, Socrates, Sozo- The categories include: A. Securely established attri-
men and Procopius is of little weight. The value of butions to Constantine as patron and/or founder; B.
the Liber pontificalis derives from its incorporation of Attributions to the Constantinian dynasty; C. Probable
or dependence on documents contemporary to Con- recipients of imperial endowments in the time of Con-
stantine.4 stantine; D. Possible attributions to Constantine which
Inscriptions are available for only a handful of cannot yet be clarified; E. Uncertain and poorly at-
churches, largely because so few of the buildings are tested attributions to Constantine. A considerable
extant, but these are cited when they exist. The number of rejected attributions is listed summarily in
archaeological evidence, which can establish dating by two geographical groups at the end. Ciampini's work
techniques of construction, brick stamps and the like, forms the foundation of the catalog in the sense that
may be found in the modern publications listed." all of his buildings are included and classified, as well
These same works should be consulted for plans, de- as several others apparently unknown to him.
scriptions, reconstructions, illustrations, and art his- The churches at Rome are probably the best
torical discussions of Constantine's churches, for these known group of Constantinian buildings and the ones
matters lie outside the focus of this article. Finally, most thoroughly studied. The Lateran basilica was
a major caution in regard to evidence of all types is the earliest of Constantine's churches, perhaps begun
that it remains incomplete. By no means all possible in 313 and finished in the early 320's, and it seems to
sites of Constantinian churches have been excavated have commanded the emperor's personal interest, hav-
or excavated adequately. Nor has all the possible ing been established on imperial property. The
literary evidence been preserved. It can only be a Lateran baptistery would be nearly contemporary. The