Page 1

1
2 WITHOUT PREJUDICE
3 Margaret McMurdo, AC Royal Commissioner 5-3-2019
4 Victorian Royal Commission into Management of Police Informants
5 PO Box 18028, Melbourne VIC 3001.
6 https://www.rcmpi.vic.gov.au
7 Ref: 20190305-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Royal Commissioner Margaret McMurdo, AC
8 Re –SUBMISSION-Supplement 5
9
10 THIS SUBMISSION IS PROVIDED FOR PUBLICATION AS IDENTITIES RELATING
11 TO CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS HAVE NOT BEEN REVEALED.
12
13 Commissioner,
14 further to my 18-2-2019 submission and 26-2-2019 and 28-2-2019, 1-3-2019, 4-3-
15 2019 supplements I desire to state the following:
16
17 As I understand it the Supreme Court of Victoria knew for years that Nicola Gobbo was a
18 police informer in violation of her position as an Officer of the Court and yet it allowed the
19 travesty of justice to continue ongoing. Hence it placed the administration of justice in
20 disrepute.
21
22 As I understand it you are still an officer of the Court and regardless that your powers as a Royal
23 Commissioner might be limited to within what is provided for as in the Letters patent in my view
24 as an Officer of the Court you still have the obligation that anyone who appears before you and
25 you suspect and/or are aware has been involved in criminal conduct then you as an Officer of the
26 court have an obligation to ensure that any such person is charged accordingly.
27
28 There are many legal practitioners to whom it is an honour to be a Officer of the Court and
29 during their working life pursues to act accordingly to their duties and obligations. However if
30 they try to criticize a wrongdoer who is an Officer of the Court then they risk that they can have
31 their practicing license suspended, even permanently. As a Professional Advocate I had no such
32 dangers and always was able to speak out. Hence many legal practitioners (Officers of the
33 Court), albeit of the record, expressed to me they valued my conduct to expose the rot.
34
35 The legal doctrine of “ex turpi causa non oritur action” denies any remedy to a litigant
36 (including a prosecutor) who does not come to court with clean hands.
37
38 If your own action is very unlawful and very unethical, if you come to court with “Dirty Hands”
39 best not to question others legality, morality, and ethics!
40
41 Hence, I view that when Nicola Gobbo appeared before the Supreme Court of Victoria to sue for
42 millions of damages the trial judge there and then becoming aware of the unlawful
43 collaboration/conspiracy between the Victorian Police and Nicola Gobbo should have there and
44 then exercised his legal duties to have them all charges with CONTEMPT OF COURT,

5-3-2019 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, perverting the course of justice, bring the
2 administration of justice in disrepute, etc.
3 That is the duty and obligation of any judicial officer as an Officer of the Court to ensure that
4 any criminal conduct is appropriately attended to. Further, the trial judge then in my view had an
5 obligation to immediately ensure that the victims of this collusion/conspiracy had their
6 convictions set aside. Instead we had that former Chief Commissioner Cromrie did his
7 investigation but nothing was done to immediately provide justice for the victims. Neither did
8 the judges of the appeal court bother to take appropriate steps and so years went by while those I
9 view wrongly convicted nevertheless were kept in imprisonment.
10 While the High Court of Australia judges were critical they too each being an Officer of the
11 Court failed to ensure appropriate charges were immediately laid. In the process of all those
12 years the victims suffered horrendously. Carl Williams was viciously murdered.
13 Other Officers of the Court joined in to become police informers against their own clients and
14 this because the Supreme Court of Victoria judges failed to act to take appropriately steps to stop
15 this rot, like a cancer.
16 .
17 Here we have Victorian Police supposing to enforce the rule of law placing itself above the rule
18 of law and not a single judge took action to stop this. Each of them therefore I view should be
19 charged for placing the administration of justice in disrepute.
20 .
21 It also means that if you as a royal commissioner have persons appearing before you who you are
22 aware of have been involved in this kind of conduct to pervert the course of justice then as an
23 Officer of the Court you are bound to ensure that appropriate steps are taken to have them
24 charged. Failing to do so in my view means you are yourself failing your duties as an Officer of
25 the Court.
26 While you may argue that you are a Queensland Officer of the Court, this is no excuse because
27 the High Court of Australia as I understand it made clear that a legal practitioner in one state can
28 likewise conduct matters in any other state. Well, then your duties and obligations as an Officer
29 of the Court are likewise applicable in other states, even if being a royal commissioner you are
30 limited. This as the separation of powers cannot mean that the Government of the Day can
31 somehow undermine/interfere with your duties and obligations as an Officer of the Court.
32 In my view it would be utter and sheer nonsense that the victims are still being kept in
33 imprisonment while those who colluded/conspired are walking free as if they committed no
34 crimes and have pro-motions as result of their unlawful conduct and/or have a massive financial
35 benefit.
36 When I appeared before Carmody J County court of Victoria His Honour refused to deal with
37 opponent lawyers flagrant breaches of court order and court rules albeit admitting had I even
38 done one of those acts I would have my appeal dismissed. Carmody J showed not to be
39 concerned with a legal practitioner flaunting court orders and/or the rules of the court and this
40 shows that the notion of equality before the courts is a fiction. Neither did Carmody J charge any
41 of the lawyers with their breaches of court orders and/or court rules. Why on earth did I have to
42 go through length to obtain court orders for no more but to force the opponent lawyers to comply
43 with legal requirements, which they were obligated to do without a court order in any event, only
44 then for them to blatantly disregard to comply with the court order?
45
46 We now have that the victims of Nicola Gobb and the Victorian Police and other officers of the
47 Court like her now are still denied justice while the culprits somehow are still protected.
48 .
49 I view that any decent legal practitioner being an Officer of the Court should demand that
50 immediately appropriate action is taken against the offenders.
51
5-3-2019 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 The Imperial Act Interpretation Act 1982 (Vic) clearly outlaw the STAR CHAMBER COURT
2 and yet this is really that was and still is applied.
3
4 In my view Nicola Gobbo lied as to that Tony Mokbel was why she became an informer as I
5 understand she was already an informer in 1995.
6
7 Likewise I view Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton lied as to claim Nicola Gobbo became an
8 informer in 2005 relating to her dealings with Tony Mokbel.
9 .
10 I have always made clear that I am against drug dealers, etc, but I have also always made clear
11 that we can never deny them a FAIR and PROPER trial and provide NATURAL JUSTICE.
12
13 The fact that the Victoria Police appear to me to have a modus operandi to get Officers of the
14 Court betraying their clients as well as acting in violation of being an OFFICER OF THE
15 COURT and the Prosecutors went along with this I view is a very serious issue.
16
17 This has not been a once of incident but a repeated conduct not only with Nicola Gobbo but also
18 with other Officers of the Court where the Victorian Police disregarded the rule of law and so
19 undermined our democratic system.
20
21 Even Counsel assisting the Royal Commissioner has an obligation as an Officer of the Court to
22 ensure appropriate charges are laid against those who offended.
23
24 When I appeared before Carmody the opponent lawyers went through great length to produce a
25 GPS chart claiming that this proved where the photos were taken and no trespassing eventuated,
26 and the witness in Evidence in Chief gave evidence to this also. Yet, upon my first question
27 about a particular photo the witness then in the end admitted he didn’t know where it was made
28 or where the building was located. Now here we had Officers of the Court blatantly misleading
29 the court and the witness committing perjury but Carmody J didn’t take any appropriate action
30 against them, this even so the GPS chart showed to be a fraudulent presentation.
31 And this is what places the administration of justice in disrepute. We have judicial officers who
32 are using DOUBLE STANDARDS that pending who commits a violation is if the court will
33 deal with it or simply ignore it.
34
35 We appear to have had at least a dozen or more judges who were dealing with Nicola Gobbo and
36 aware of her unlawful conduct and yet none of them actually took appropriate steps against her
37 and the relevant police officers.
38 How on earth can any FAIR MINIDED PERSON trust the administration of justice when the
39 judges themselves are flaunting their obligations as Officers of the Court?
40 .
41 This Royal Commission may take a year or more since its announcement to present a final report
42 but it would be a grave injustice if those who were wrongly convicted in the meantime are
43 denied justice. As I understand you made yourself clear that you are not to deal with the
44 convictions themselves and that is correct but you as an Officer of the Court you must not delay
45 any action against those who offended against their victims’ rights and for undermining the
46 administration of justice.
47
48 Thake for example the child Dhakota Williams who was robbed of her grandfather George
49 Williams inheritance when the court ordered the? Essendon property to be sold. In my view the
50 ATO perverted the course of justice by claiming in their statements to AVERT where they knew
51 or ought to have known that they couldn’t rely upon AVERMENT. (5-8-2005 decision
5-3-2019 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 Commonwealth v Schorel-Hlavka).Indeed the County Court of Victoria in its orders made this
2 very clear on 19-7-2006 to uphold both appeals I had filed.
3 Why then are they not charged for perverting the course of justice and harming the child
4 Dhakota Williams? Moreover, if as appears to me Nicola Gobbo was involved to have George
5 Williams pleading guilty then I view this decision should have been set aside long ago and this
6 would also mean that the ATO case has no legal standing for this also.
7 .
8 While you may restrict yourself to only deal with how police deals with informers and so ignore
9 the harm such as caused upon Dhakota Williams that flowed from it, this to me would mean
10 really that JUSTICE CONTINUES TO BE DENIED. One cannot separate the end result from
11 the Victorian Police as I view it criminal conduct to undermine the administration of justice.
12
13 Citizens of the state of Victoria cannot accept that those persons who were convicted due to
14 having lawyers who violated their obligations/duties as an Officer of the Court are rightly
15 convicted. In my view any court who nevertheless allows those convictions to remain on foot
16 rather than to immediately set aside each and every so to say questionable/contaminated
17 conviction only becomes part of placing the administration of justice in disrepute.
18 .
19 Let the prosecutor consider if without any contaminated evidence there is a case against any
20 person and then follow up with appropriate charges to pursue the courts to deal with those
21 accused in a FAIR and PROPER hearing, but let us never accept that any STAR CHAMBER
22 COURT kind of system can be part of our administration of justice. To allow for this means that
23 soon many innocent people will end up convicted because those involved to uphold the law may
24 simply abuse the system for their own benefits.
25
26 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
27 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

28 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL ®

29 (Our name is our motto!)

5-3-2019 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati