Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
4.1 Secondary data analysis: Secondary data analysis, the imperative part of this
study has been undertaken to analyse the performance of HDFC bank in
bancassurance so far and the contribution of bancassurance to the progress of the
bank in the form of increase in ROA, revenue etc., using ratio analysis. Since
HDFC bank has started earning revenue for the sale of insurance policies from
2015 that the analysis includes from the year 2015-2017.
TABLE 4.1.1
HDFC BANK’S EARNINGS FOR THE SALE OF HDFC STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE POLICIES FROM 2004-2006
Year 2015 –16 2016 -17 2017- 18
Revenue earned 16,99 lacs 88,14 lacs 112,09 lacs
for the sale of
insurance policies
CHART 4.1.1
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be seen that there has been an impressive
growth in the revenue over the years for the sale of HDFC standard life insurance
policies by HDFC bank.
TABLE 4.1.2
RETAIL SEGMENT PROFIT FROM THE YEAR 2004 TO 2006: Retail
banking segment is undertaking bancassurance. And it is the fastest growing
banking business segment. One of the reasons being the bank’s dealing with the
sale of insurance policies to its retail customers. It has been mentioned even in the
director report of HDFC bank. Thus a glimpse at its profit would be imperative.
CHART 4.1.2:
1000 875.71
800 701.67
Revenue Earned
600 520.64
(in Lacs)
400
200
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be observed that there has been a
phenomenal increase in the profit of retail segment from 2015 -2017 , which
symbolizes the bancassurance contribution.
TABLE 4.1.3
CHART 4.1.3
2000000
1000000
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the above, we can infer that there has been a phenomenal
increase in the growth of retail assets over the years that it indicates the
contribution of bancassurance to it.
TABLE 4.1.4:
CHART 4.1.4:
3000000
2,420,80
2500000
Operating
2000000 1,691,09 Expenses (in
1500000 Lakhs)
1,085,40
1000000
500000
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the chart, we can observe that there has been an increase in
the operating expenses of the bank. Since, HDFC bank is only in its infant stage in
bancassurance, it can perform more to reduce the same in the long run.
TABLE 4.1.5:
Chart 4.1.5:
21
20
19
Ratio
18
17
16
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Chart 4.1.6:
TABLE 4.1.7:
Chart 4.1.7:
2.00%
1.50%
`
1.00%
Ratio
0.50%
0.00%
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Chart 4.1.8:
Return on assets
1.50%
1.45%
1.40%
Ratio
1.35%
1.30%
1.25%
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be observed that the return on assets of the
bank has been decreased from the year 2015 – 2017.
TABLE 4.1.9;
BUSINESS PER EMPLOYEE: The business per employee from 2003-2006 is as
follows:
Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Business Per 806 758 607
Chart 4.1.9:
INFERENCE: From the above, it is clear that the business per employee of the
bank over the years has been on the decreasing trend.
TABLE 4.1.10
6 Profit per
4 employee
0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be observed that profit per employee of the
bank over the years has been on the decreasing trend.
RBI guidelines: As per the RBI guidelines for the banks to enter into the
insurance sector, The CRAR of the bank should not be less than 10 per cent,
and the level of Non Performing Assets (NPAs) should be reasonable. Hence,
analysis of such ratios is also important.
Capital adequacy ratio: Capital adequacy ratio from the year 2015-2017 can
be shown as follows: (As the total capital includes tier-1 and tier-2, it can be
viewed separately.)
TABLE 4.1.11 Tier 1 capital:
Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Tier 1 capital 3,96,216 5,149,91 6,352,71
Where,
Risk weighted
assets and 41,27,103 60,217,62 74,081,92
contingents
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be seen that the capital adequacy ratio
though decreased in the year 2016,it has been increased in the year 2017-18.
TABLE 4.1.14:
0.40%
0.30%
0.20% Ratio
0.10%
0.00%
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
INFERENCE: From the above, it is clear that the percentage of net non-
performing assets to customer assets has been increasing from the year 2015-2017
TABLE 4.1.15
0.50%
0.40%
0.30%
0.20% Ratio
0.10%
0.00%
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be observed that the percentage of net
non-performing assets to net advances has been increased from the year 2015 to
2016 and it has been decreased in the year 2017.
TABLE 4.1.16
INFERENCE: From the above, it can be observed that the percentage of gross
non-performing assets to gross advances has been decreasing from the year 2015
–2017.