Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
SHRUTHI SRINIVAS
04XQCM6089
2004-2006
1
DECLARATION
I further declare that this project report has not formed a basis for the award
of any Degree/Diploma of the institution or any other university.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Shruthi Srinivas)
2
GUIDE’S CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Ms. Shruthi Srinivas has satisfactorily completed the
project report titled ‘A study on customer satisfaction towards room service
at Le Meridien, Bangalore’, in the partial fulfillment of the requirement for
the award of Master of Business Administration for the academic year 2004-
2006.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Mr. Ramgopal)
Guide
3
PRINICPAL’S CPERTIFICATE
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Dr.Nagesh.S.Malavalli)
Principal
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I extend my sincere thanks to Mr. Ramgopal for his able guidance and
assistance rendered in the preparation of this report.
At the outset, I would like to sincerely thank Ms. Alia Begum, HR Manager
and Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Training Manager for their encouragement and
valuable support during my stay with them.
Lastly, I would like to thank my parents and friends for their continuous help
and support.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Shruthi Srinivas)
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
6
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
7
INTRODUCTION TO HOTEL INDUSTRY
Tourism is India’s largest forex earner, and contributing largely to the influx
of tourists is the large number of hotels, to suit the plethora of needs, whims
and fancies of the tourists. The hospitality industry in India comprises of
properties, which are either privately owned or run by the government.
The industry is very competitive and clearly only the hotels that provide
value added services stand to gain. The breadwinner in most hotels is the
food and beverages department, which cater to the tastes and fancies of
various guests.
8
INTRODUCTION TO CONSUMER
BEHAVIOR
Understanding the buying behavior of the target market is the essential task
of marketing manager under the marketing concept. The consumer market
consists of all the individuals and households that buy goods and services for
personnel consumption. Consumers may vary in age, income, and taste.
Marketers find useful to distinguish different consumers groups or segments
to develop products and services tailored to their needs. Increasingly,
managers have had to turn to consumer research for answers to the most
important questions about any market, called seven O's of the market place.
9
lot of research done in finding the relationship between marketing stimuli
and consumer's response. The starting point is the stimulus response model,
which shows marketing and other stimuli entering the buyers "black box"
and producing the buyer's responses. Marketing stimuli consists of the 4 P's.
Product, Price, Place and Promotion. Environmental stimuli consists of
Major forces and events in the buyer's macro-environmental: Economic,
technological, political and cultural. All these stimuli pass through the
buyer's black box and produce the buyer's purchase decisions shown on the
right product choice, brand choice, dealer choice, purchase timing and
purchase amount.
The marketer's main task is to understand what happens in the buyer's black
box between outside stimuli and the buyer's purchase decision.
10
Buyer Characteristics Buyer Decision Process
Cultural Problem Recognition
Social Information Search
Personal Evaluation
Psychological Post Purchase Behavior
The Black Box restricts itself to the internal factors that influence decision.
However, market must look beyond this, at the buyer-grid network of
purchase.
BUYER-GRID NETWORK
11
BUYER BEHAVIOR PATTERNS
A single consumer may exhibit all the above depending on the offering, time
of purchase, value exchanged, and occasion of purchase necessity of
consumer and other related variables.
12
'Corporate image' is in the eye of the receiver. A company may transmit any
number of messages to convey a particular self-image, but it is the
'reception' of the message that is important. One advantage of image is that it
is transmutable.
Needless to say that a corporate image has close links with the consumer,
Virginia Valentine of Semiotic Solutions, a market research firm, explains
the tie like this: '"For the purpose of understanding corporate imagery the
whole focus is on the way in which a consumer forms a symbol. The
mythologies which guide the consumers’ deepest and most emotional
decisions are of the great importance."
13
3. Geographically dispersed operations can be managed with a corporate
identity alone.
4. For a budget hotel, development of identities related to individual states is
the winning trick
5. Most important of all, economics of communication can be achieved by
presenting a well-defined image.
SERVICE SECTOR
Service sector plays an important role in the Indian economy. The trend was
set and in the nineties, service had gained dominance. On the other hand the
competition in service organization is becoming intense and severe. As a
result the service organization, if they have to be successful, has to have a
more professional approach to manage their business organization.
Specific demand for service marketing concepts has come from the
deregulated industries and professional services as both of these groups have
gone through rapid changes in the ways they do business. In the past, the
government has deregulated many very large service industries including
airlines, banking telecommunications and trucking. As a result, marketing
decisions that used to be tightly controlled by the government are now
partially, and in some cases totally, within the control of individual firms.
Because of the advances in information based technologies a multitude of
14
new services concepts have exploded in to the market place. Fax machines,
voice mail and cellular phones are examples of technology-based concepts
that have substituted for traditional ways of a delivering similar service.
Put in most simple terms, services are deeds, processes and performances.
Relying on the simple broad definition of services, it quickly becomes
apparent that services are produced not only by service business such as
those just described but are also integral to the offering of many
manufactured goods producers.
15
Hotel: The concept and Marketing
Further the facilities may also get the provision of amusement centers,
shopping complex, swimming pool, garden, car parking, conference hall and
advance communication facilities. In a hotel industry thus, the formulation
of product mix becomes significant as new sophisticated and refine services
16
bear the efficacy of wooing customers. Besides, sound behavioral
management helps in excelling competition and is found instrumental in
turning the potential customers in to actual customers.
Now the organization engaged in hotel business is required to say good- bye
to the traditional management practices in which the marketing strategies
were also traditional. Of late, it is essential that the hotel organizations
assign over riding priority to modem management in which customers are
always supposed to be right.
17
marketing concept adopted in other industries is found effective even in the
hotel industry. Marketing is considered to be a customer satisfaction
engineering tool. Hotel management is a managerial approach to satisfy
guests and strengthen the promotional measures so that the potential guests
are motivated and thus transformed in to actual guests.
18
Classification of a hotel:
2. Commercial hotels: These are meant for the people who visit a place for
commerce/business purposes and so these hotels are found located at the
commercial or industrial centers. They usually focus their attention on
individual travel and run by owners.
3. Resort hotels: The resort hotels are meant for the holidaymakers, tourists
and for those who need a change in atmosphere mainly on health ground.
These are found located near the sea, mountain and other areas having a
natural beauty and healthy atmosphere.
19
4. International hotels: These are the modem luxurious hotels, classified on
the basis of international guidelines. These are placed in various star
categories five star deluxe, five star, three star, two star, and one star.
These hotels are mostly owned by public companies where B.O.D is
constituted for its control. These are found suitable for metropolitan cities
where affluent sections of the society and foreign tourists are government
representative stay.
5. Floating hotels: The floating hotels are located on water surface. Places like
sea, river or lake are considered suitable. For floating hotels, these provide
almost facilities a good hotel provides. In developed countries, old luxury
ships have been converted in to floating hotels.
20
Hotel product:
Reception - Welcome
Boarding - Catering, Restaurant, Cafeteria
Lodging - Room, bed, light, air, sanitation etc
Entertainment - TV/ VCR / VCP, Internet, dance, music,
cultural shows, drama. Shopping arcade,
organization of fair and exhibition.
Medical - First aid / ambulance
Personal - Space
Communication - Telephone, newspaper, reservation,
21
Hotel marketing in Indian Environment
The hotel industry, particularly in the Indian context has often considered
marketing a tantamount of sale. But the business terms, specially after the
development of modem marketing concept, have classified both the terms
just to avoid confusion. The task of the hotel marketers is to make the
industry remunerate and to make available to the visitors the best possible
services. This naturally aggravates the functional responsibility of a hotel
manager of today. Today, he is expected to make an in-depth study of what
the competitors are during, determining objectives and strategies, advertising
a promise which is genuine and credible, keeping the promises simple and
strengthening consumer oriented proposition and in formation system for
monitoring of progress.
The aforesaid facts make it clear that in the Indian context, the application of
marketing concept in hotel business is at the stage of infancy which
necessitates handling of problems in proper perspective so that a strong
foundation is engineered for its repaid development as industry, making
available world-class services to its users. In Indian context, it is not only
22
sufficient that we concentrate on classified hotels but also, attempt to
improve the managerial proficiency of unclassified hotels as all the tourists
or travelers are not in a position to afford the high pricing strategy of world
class groups. With a viewpoint of promoting cosmetic tourism or social
tourism, this aspect needs priority attention.
23
CHAPTER – 2
RESEARCH
DESIGN
24
INTRODUCTION
The problem has been selected to know the customers perception room wise
and series wise, the product quality that involve image, external look, price,
food quality, availability of rooms, overall experience etc. Thus by knowing
what customer expects in this hotel, the organization can change their
service pattern.
25
OBJECTIVES
The following are the objectives of this study:
1. To ascertain the quality of the room services provided in the hotel.
2. To assess the overall satisfaction level of the customer, series wise.
3. To ascertain which service is doing the best in a particular series.
METHODOLOGY
26
SAMPLING PLAN
27
LIMITATIONS
There were a few hurdles or constraints experienced while carrying out the
study. They were as follows:
1. The respondents are mainly professional who could spare very less
time for such kind of activities. The responses have a great extent of
bias.
2. This study cannot be generalized to any other 5 star hotels in or outside
Bangalore.
3. The study conducted is not representative of the entire population and
represents only a limited section.
4. Since it is an academic project it is time bound and only finite samples
could be administered.
PLAN OF ANALYSIS
28
OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER SCHEME
29
CHAPTER – 3
PROFILE OF
LE MERIDIEN
30
LE MERIDIEN WORLDWIDE
The company also enjoys a strategic alliance with JAL-owned Nikko Hotels,
providing loyal guests access to an additional 44 properties around the
world. Le Meridien Hotels and Resorts Limited is headquartered in London.
31
Le Meridien promises its hotel customers a hotel experience, delivered
through its four core values,
• A sophisticated, elegant European style-with a French accent: La
Difference.
• A high level of personal service, exciting cuisine and an extensive
range of facilities for business, conferences/meetings, banqueting
and leisure.
• A respect for the local culture.
• Highly trained and motivated staff, committed to providing
excellent service and anticipating the needs of the guests.
MISSION STATEMENT
32
VISION AND VALUES OF LE MERIDIEN
• They are growth and result oriented whilst believing work should
be fun.
• They aim for high quality of service.
• They welcome and promote change as an opportunity not a threat.
• They work to promote confidence in their ability to handle the
future to both their staff and their customers.
• Their style is open with little emphasis of status of bureaucracy.
• They encourage and support new and creative ways of doing
things.
• They stress both the benefits of teamwork and the ability of each
individual to add values.
33
LE MERIDIEN – ART + TECH
Concept
34
Art
• Backlit photographs, commissioned for Le Meridien, are set into
sections of timber panelling and an inset showcase within the console
table displays other elements of art within the room.
Art + Tech
35
Sleeping
Bathroom
• The Art + Tech bathrooms are either shower rooms with freestanding
shower tower incorporating shower and body jets with glass screens, or
bathrooms where a large steel bath with a circular end allows a
comfortable standing area for showering.
• In some rooms, where space allows, there are Victorian-style roll top
baths with drencher rose and rain bars.
• An etched glass wash hand basin sits on a limestone top wash table to
match the finish of the limestone flooring.
36
LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE
37
LOCATION
The average taxi fare from the airport to the hotel is USD 15.00 (+10% tax
each way by car).
TRAVEL INFORMATION
38
The hotel incorporates all the following amenities that you would expect in a
Le Meridien hotel including:
39
FEATURES
1. Superior - all rooms were refurbished in 2001 and are available with
either a king-size or twin beds. The bedrooms are very spacious, at
approximately 32.52 square metres, and also have plenty of storage space.
All rooms can accommodate an extra bed and are very popular with our
family guests as they also interconnect to other Superior bedrooms. The
bathroom features all the amenities, with a bathtub and shower, hairdryer
and magnifying shaving mirror. Our bedrooms offer a golf course, pool or
green view. All rooms have a high security electronic locking system with
'Dialock' facility.
2. Executive Suite - these suites are elegant and spacious, with an area of
46.46 square meters, accommodating separate seating and dining areas and a
king-size bed. Ideal for both the business and leisure traveler, these suites
are also well suited for families.
40
4. Royal Club Suite - elegant and spacious rooms, with an area of 46.46
square metres, accommodating separate seating and dining areas with all the
features of Royal Club rooms.
5. Deluxe Suite - the Deluxe Suites comprise two elegant and spacious
rooms, with an area of 85.5 square metres, and are tastefully furnished with
a complimentary minibar. A few of these suites also have a kitchenette and a
separate bar counter. The bathroom features enhanced amenities with a
separate bathtub and walk-in shower
BUSINESS MATTERS
For all the business matters Le Meridien has an entire ground floor. Le
Meridien Bangalore has a choice of six convention halls to choose from.
Elegantly furnished and equipped with the latest state-of-the-art equipment
is the business center, with its two very own boardrooms.
41
Here in Le Meridien, it has the following types of Restaurants and Bars,
they are mentioned below;
42
CHAPTER – 4
ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATIO-
N OF DATA
43
THE ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION TOWARDS ROOM
SERVICES AT LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE.
The information which was gathered in the process of conducting this study
has been analyzed and suitable inferences have been drawn, which have
been listed in this following chapter. Some of the variables analyzed are:
• Respondents Profile
• Purpose of the visit
• Frequency and length of visit
• The satisfaction level of all the attributes of room services-
series wise
The tables have been drawn using basic statistical techniques such as
drawing of percentages and use of graphs. The data which was collected
from primary sources have been tabulated by adopting the method of single
and bi-variant tables. After the tables have been tabulated, graphs have been
drawn for better pictorial understanding.
44
TABLE 1: SHOWING THE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS.
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the number of male and female respondents. The
male respondents constituted 74% of the respondents and the remaining 26%
were female respondents.
INFERENCE:
From this table we can infer that majority of the respondents were males.
45
GRAPH 1: SHOWING THE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS.
80
70
60
Percentage
50
40
NO.OF
30 RESPONDENTS
20
10
0
Male Female
Gender
46
TABLE 2: SHOWING PURPOSE OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the purpose of visit of the male and female
respondents. Most of the male respondent’s purpose of visit was business i.e.
61.40% and 23.20% of them was for conference and a very low percentage
was for leisure, i.e. 15.40%. Majority of the female respondent’s purpose of t
visit was leisure, i.e. 39.10% and 30% was for conference purpose and
30.80% was for business purpose.
47
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that majority of the male respondents visit Le
Meridien for business purposes and majority of the female respondents were
there for relaxation.
48
GRAPH 2: SHOWING THE PURPOSE OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
70
60
50
40
Percentage
Male
30 Female
20
10
0
Business Conference Leisure
Purpose of Visit
49
TABLE 3: SHOWING THE REGULARITY OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
REGULARITY OF
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
VISIT
368 108
FIRST TIME 476
(45.20%) (37.70%)
446 178
REPEATED 624
(54.70%) (62.20%)
814 286
TOTAL 1100
(100%) (100%)
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the number of male respondents who were visiting
the hotel for the first time which was very low 45.20%. The respondents
who had visited repeatedly were 54.70% and the female respondents who
were visiting the hotel for the first time was also very low, i.e.37.70% and
who were visiting repeatedly was 62.20% from the total respondents.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the percentage of respondents visiting the hotel
repeatedly is high. Most of the respondents were from the corporate world
and the companies sponsor them. Thus there was regularity in visits.
50
GRAPH 3: SHOWING THE REGULARITY OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
70
60
50
Percentage
40
First Time
30
Repeat
20
10
0
Male Female
Gender
51
TABLE 4: SHOWING THE LENGTH OF THE VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
572 94
1 NIGHT 666
(70.20%) (32.80%)
109 86
2-4 NIGHTS 195
(13.30%) (30.00%)
133 106
5 OR MORE NIGHTS 239
(16.30%) (37.20%)
814 286
TOTAL 1100
(100%) (l00%)
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the length of the stay of male and female
respondents, in which the male respondents 70.20% of them have stayed for
a night, which is very high percentage, 13.30% stayed for 2-4 nights and a
very low percentage 16.30% stayed for more than 5 nights. The female
respondent’s percentage is higher in the 5 or more nights comparatively.
52
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the male respondents stay was usually for 1 day
as the purpose of visit was usually for business, and the female respondents
stay was for more than 4-5 nights as the purpose of their visit was usually for
leisure.
53
GRAPH 4: SHOWING THE LENGTH OF STAY OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
80
70
60
50
Percentage
40
Male
30 Female
20
10
0
1 Night 2- 4 Nights 5 or more
nights
Length of Visit
54
TABLE 5: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS RELATING TO VARIOUS
ATTRIBUTES OF 11 SERIES ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
DÉCOR OF 63 3 2 28 3 1
68 32
ROOM (92.60%) (4.40%) (2.90%) (87.50%) (9.30%) (3.10%)
QUALITY OF 60 5 3 26 4 2
68 32
ROOM (88.20%) (7.30%) (4.40%) (81.20%) (1.20%) (6.20%)
QUALITY OF 62 4 2 27 3 2
HOUSEKEEP 68 32
(91.10%) (5.80%) (2.90%) (84.30%) (9.30%) (6.20%)
ING
MAINTENAN 61 5 2 26 5 1
68 32
CE (89.70%) (7.30%) (2.90%) (81.20%) (1.50%) (3.10%)
IN-ROOM 59 6 3 23 6 3
68 32
DINING (86.70%) (8.80%) (4.40%) (71.80%) (1.80%) (9.30%)
APPEARANC 63 4 1 28 4 0
68 32
E OF HOTEL (92.60%) (5.80%) (1.40%) (87.50%) (1.20%) (0%)
VALUE FOR 62 5 1 25 4 3
68 32
MONEY (91.10%) (7.30%) (1.40%) (78.10%) (1.20%) (9.30%)
OVERALL 63 3 2 24 3 3
SATISFACTI 68 32
(92.60%) (4.40%) (2.90%) (75.00%) (1.50%) (9.30%)
ON
55
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of various attributes of 11 series rooms.
The satisfaction level of the male respondents relating to the decor of the
room was relatively high, i.e. 92% than the female respondents was 87%.
The dissatisfaction level was very low in both the cases. The satisfaction
level relating to the quality of the room in the both the cases were 88% and
81 % respectively. The dissatisfaction level was very low, i.e. 4% and 60%.
The satisfaction level of quality of housekeeping was relatively high 91%
and the dissatisfaction level was relatively low 4%. The satisfaction level of
the male and female respondents relating to overall satisfaction was high
92% and 75% respectively. This was low compared to the dissatisfaction
level of 2% and 9% respectively.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of all the attributes was
relatively high in all the 11 series. The satisfaction level of appearance of the
hotel was the highest in male respondents and female respondents. The
dissatisfaction level of male and female respondents was highest relating to
in-room dinning.
56
GRAPH 5.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL RELATING TO VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
OF SERIES 11 ROOMS.
satisfaction
11 SERIES MALE
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Value for money
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Décor of room
Percentage
57
GRAPH 5.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL RELATING TO VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
OF SERIES 11 ROOMS.
11 SERIES FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Value for money
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
58
TABLE 6: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF SERIES
12 ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFAC NEUTRA DISSATISFAC
TOTAL TOTAL
S CTION L CTION TION L TION
DÉCOR OF 42 22 19 9 5 3
83 17
ROOM (50.60%) (26.51 %) (22.89%) (52.90%) (29.41%) (17.64%)
QUALTIY OF 46 20 17 10 3 4
83 17
ROOM (54.42%) (24.09%) (20.50%) (58.83%) (17.64%) (23.53%)
QUALITY OF 54 17 12 12 3 2
HOUSEKEEP 83 17
ING
(65.10%) (20.50%) (14.50%) (70.59%) (17.64%) (11.76%)
58 16 9 11 4 2
MAINTENAN
83 17
CE (69.90%) (19.30%) (10.90%) (64.71 %) (23.53%) (11.76%)
IN-ROOM 49 21 13 8 4 5
83 17
DINING (59.00%) (25.30%) (15.70%) (47.06%) (23.53%) (29.41%)
APPEARANC 62 13 8 7 6 4
83 17
E OF HOTEL (74.40%) (15.70%) (9.60%) (41.18%) (35.29%) (23.53%)
VALUE FOR 56 22 5 8 3 4
83 17
MONEY (67.50%) (26.50%) (6.02%) (47.06%) (17.64%) (23.53%)
OVERALL 47 21 15 6 7 4
SATISFACTI 83 17
ON (56.70%) (25.30%) (18.07%) (35.29%) (41.18%) (23.53%)
59
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 12 series rooms. The
satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 50%, which is comparatively
low, and neutral was 26% and dissatisfaction was 22%. For the female
respondents the satisfaction level of decor of room was 52%, 29.41 % was
neutral and 17.65% was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the
quality of the room was 54.42%, neutral were 24.09% and 20.05% was
dissatisfaction for the male respondents.58.83% was satisfaction, 29.41%
neutral and 17.65% was dissatisfaction of the female respondents. The
satisfaction level of housekeeping was low, which was 65.1% for the male
respondents and for female respondents it was 70.59%. The satisfaction
level of the male and female respondents for quality of housekeeping was
low, and the service received for the value of money paid was low in both
male and female respondents. Overall satisfaction had been very low for
male respondents-56.7%, neutral-25.3% and 18.07% was dissatisfaction. For
female respondents, the satisfaction level was 35.29%, 14.81% was neutral
and 23.53% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male respondents’ satisfaction level
relating to the appearance of the hotel and for the female respondents the
quality of housekeeping was the highest. The dissatisfaction level for the
male respondents was decor of the room and for female respondents, quality
of in-room dinning was the highest.
60
GRAPH 6.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 12 SERIES ROOMS.
12 SERIES MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Value for
money
Attributes
In-room dining
Quality of
housekeeping
Decor of room
Percentage
61
GRAPH 6.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 12 SERIES ROOMS.
12 SERIES FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
62
TABLE 7: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 14
SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
53 12 9 12 8 6
QUALITY OF 74 26
ROOM (71.60%) (16.20%) (12.10%) (46.10%) (30.80%) (23.10%)
QUALITY OF 46 18 10 14 7 5
HOUSEKEEP 74 26
ING (62.10%) (24.30%) (13.50%) (53.80%) (26.90%) (19.20%)
54 14 6 13 8 5
MAINTENAN 74 26
CE (73.00%) (19.00%) (8.10%) (50.00%) (30.80%) (19.20%)
62 7 5 21 4 2
IN-ROOM 74 26
DINING (83.70%) (9.45%) (6.70%) (80.80%) (22.20%) (7.70%)
48 22 4 20 6 0
APPEARANC 74 26
E OF HOTEL (64.90%) (9.70%) (5.40%) (76.90%) (23.10%) (0.00%)
64 6 4 23 2 1
VALUE FOR 74 26
MONEY (86.40%) (8.10%) (5.40%) (88.50%) (7.60%) (3.80%)
OVERALL 48 19 7 17 5 4
SATISFACTI 74 26
ON (64.90%) (25.70%) (9.50%) (65.45%) (19.20%) (63.20%)
63
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 14 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 56.8%, which is low,
neutral was 24.3% and dissatisfaction was 19%, which is relatively high. For
the female respondents the satisfaction level of decor of room was 38.4%,
which was very low, 30.8% was neutral and 30.8% was dissatisfaction,
which was very high. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the room
was 71.6%, 16.2% was neutral and 12.1% dissatisfaction for the male
respondents. For the female respondents 46.1% was satisfaction, 30.8%
neutral and 23.1 % was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of
housekeeping for the male respondents were 62.1% and for female
respondents were 53.8% which was very low. The service received for the
value of money paid was high in both male and female respondents. Overall
satisfaction has been very low for male respondents which was 64.9%,
25.7% was neutral and 9.5% was dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the
satisfaction level was 65.5%, 19.2% was neutral and 22.2% was
dissatisfaction which was high comparatively.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male and female respondents satisfaction
level for the value for money was highest, and dissatisfaction level relating
to the decor of room was the highest for male and female respondents.
64
GRAPH 7.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
Overall satisfaction
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
65
GRAPH 7.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
Overall satisfaction
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
66
TABLE 8: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 14
SERIES UP ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUT
ES SATISFACT NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFACT NEUTRA DISSATISFA
TOTAL TOTAL
ION L CTION ION L CTION
63 20 9 5 2 1
DÉCOR OF 92 8
ROOM
(68.40%) (21.70%) (9.70%) (62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)
84 6 2 4 2 2
QUALITY 92 8
OF ROOM (91.30%) (6.50%) (2.10%) (50.00%) (25.00%) (25.00%)
QUALITY 75 9 8 6 2 0
OF 92 8
HOUSEKEE (81.50%) (9.70%) (9.80%) (75.00%) (25.00%) (0.00%)
PING
61 20 11 7 1 0
MAINTENA 92 8
NCE (66.30%) (21.70%) (11.90%) (87.50%) (12.50%) (0.00%)
58 19 15 6 1 1
IN-ROOM 92 8
DINING (63.04%) (20.70%) (16.30%) (75.00%) (12.50%) (12.50%)
APPEARAN 72 14 16 5 2 1
CE OF 92 8
HOTEL (78.30%) (15.20%) (17.30%) (62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)
VALUE 77 8 7 4 3 1
FOR 92 8
MONEY (83.75%) (8.69%) (7.60%) (50.00%) (37.50%) (12.50%)
80 7 5 6 1 1
OVERALL
SATISFACT 92 8
ION (86.90%) (7.60%) (5.43%) (75.00%) (12.50%) (12.50%)
67
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 14 series up rooms.
The satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 68.4%, which was low,
neutral was 21.7% and dissatisfaction was 9.7%. For the female respondents
the satisfaction level of decor of room was 62.5%, 25% was neutral and
12.5% was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the
room was 91.3%, which was high, 6.5% was neutral and 2.1%
dissatisfaction for the male respondents was low. 50% satisfaction, 25%
neutral and 25% dissatisfaction was high for female respondents. The
satisfaction level of housekeeping for the male respondents were 81.5% and
for female respondents were 75% which was high. Overall satisfaction has
been very high for male respondents 86.9%, 7.6% was neutral and 5.43%
was dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the satisfaction level was 75%,
12.5% was neutral and 12.5% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male respondents the satisfaction of
quality of room and for female respondents the quality of maintenance was
the highest. The dissatisfaction level for the male respondents for quality of
in-room dinning and for the female respondents the value of money was the
highest.
68
GRAPH 8.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES UP ROOMS.
14 SERIES UP MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Value for money
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
69
GRAPH 8.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES UP ROOMS.
14 SERIES UP FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Value for money
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
70
TABLE 9: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 15
SERIES UP ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA
S TOTAL TOTAL
CTION L CTION CTION L CTION
56 8 6 20 5 5
DÉCOR OF 70 30
ROOM (80.00%) (11.40%) (8.50%) (66.60%) (16.70%) (16.70%)
62 6 2 12 10 8
QUALITY OF 70 30
ROOM (88.50%) (8.50%) (2.85%) (40.00%) (33.30%) (26.70%)
QUALITY OF 60 7 3 17 7 6
HOUSEKEEP 70 30
ING (85.70%) (10.00%) (4.20%) (56.70%) (23.30%) (20.00%)
48 20 2 21 5 4
MAINTENEN 70 30
ANCE (68.50%) (28.50%) (2.85%) (70.00%) (16.70%) (13.30%)
41 19 10 14 8 8
IN-ROOM 70 30
DINING (58.50%) (27.10%) (14.30%) (46.70%) (26.70%) (26.70%)
54 9 7 16 9 5
APPEARANC 70 30
E OF HOTEL (77.10%) (12.80%) (10.00%) (53.30%) (30.00%) (16.70%)
52 10 8 20 6 4
VALUE FOR 70 30
MONEY (74.20%) (14.30%) (11.40%) (66.60%) (20.00%) (13.30%)
51 12 7 18 7 5
RECOMMEN 70 30
ADTION (72.80%) (17.14%) (10.00%) (60.00%) (23.30%) (16.70%)
OVERALL 63 6 1 19 8 3
SATISFACTI 70 30
ON (90.00%) (8.50%) (1.42%) (63.30%) (26.70%) (10.00%)
71
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 15 series rooms. The
satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 56%, which was low, neutral
was 11.4% and dissatisfaction was 8.5%. For the female respondents the
satisfaction level of decor of room was 66.6%, 16.7% was neutral and 16.7%
was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the room
was 88.5%, which was high, 8.5% was neutral and 2.85% was
dissatisfaction for the male respondents, which was low. 40% satisfaction,
33.3% neutral and 26.7% dissatisfaction was high for female respondents.
The satisfaction level of housekeeping for the male respondents was 85.7%
and for female respondents it was 56.7%, which was comparatively low. The
quality of maintenance was average in both the cases. Overall satisfaction
for male respondents was 90%, 8.5% was neutral and 1.42% was
dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the satisfaction level was 63.3%,
26.7% was neutral and 3% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male respondents the overall satisfaction
was the highest and for female respondents the quality of maintenance was
the highest. The dissatisfaction level for male respondents was value of
money paid and for female respondents the quality of room was the highest.
72
GRAPH 9.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 15 SERIES UP ROOMS.
15 SERIES UP MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall
satisfaction
In-room dining
Quality of
housekeeping
Decor of room
Percentage
73
GRAPH 9.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 15 SERIES UP ROOMS.
15 SERIES UP FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
74
TABLE 10: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFACT NEUTRA DISSATISFA
S TOTAL TOTAL
CTION L CTION ION L CTION
65 7 7 18 3 0
DÉCOR OF 79 21
ROOM (82.20%) (8.80%) (8.80%) (85.70%) (14.20%) (0.00%)
72 5 2 16 3 2
QUALITY OF 79 21
ROOM (91.10%) (6.30%) (2.50%) (76.10%) (14.20%) (9.50%)
QUALITY OF 74 3 2 12 5 4
HOUSEKEEP 79 21
ING (93.60%) (3.70%) (2.50%) (57.10%) (23.80%) (19.00%)
68 6 5 14 5 2
MAINTENEN 79 21
CE (86.10%) (7.50%) (6.30%) (66.60%) (23.80%) (9.50%)
67 6 6 17 3 1
IN-ROOM 79 21
DINING (84.80%) (7.50%) (7.50%) (80.90%) (14.20%) (4.70%)
63 9 7 16 4 1
APPEARANC 79 21
E OF HOTEL (79.70%) (11.30%) (8.80%) (76.10%) (19.00%) (4.70%)
64 9 6 13 5 3
VALUE FOR 79 21
MONEY (81%) (11.30%) (7.50%) (61.90%) (23.80%) (14.20%)
70 5 4 19 2 0
RECOMMEA 79 21
NDATION (88.60%) (6.30%) (5.10%) (90.50%) (9.50%) (0.00%)
OVERALL 69 5 5 18 2 1
SATISFACTI 79 21
ON (87.30%) (6.30%) (6.30%) (85.70%) (9.50%) (4.70%)
75
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 16 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents for decor of room was 82.2%,
which was high, 85.7% was for female respondents which was also high,
and the dissatisfaction level was nil. The satisfaction level of quality of room
was 91%, for female respondents it was 76.1 % which was also high. The
male respondents were satisfied with the quality of housekeeping but for
female respondents it was comparatively low. The satisfaction level of
quality of maintenance and quality of in-room dinning of male respondents
was relatively high but for female respondents the quality of maintenance
was low and the in-room dinning was almost the same. Satisfaction level of
appearance of hotel for male respondents was 79.7% and for female
respondents it was 76.1%, which was good. The services received for the
value of money paid was satisfactory in both the cases. The overall
satisfaction level for male respondents was 87.3% and for female
respondents it was 85.7% which was high in both the cases.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the male respondents, satisfaction level relating
to the quality of housekeeping and for female respondents the decor of the
room was the highest. The dissatisfaction level of quality of maintenance
was high in both the cases.
76
GRAPH 10.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
16 SERIES DOWN MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
77
GRAPH 10.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
78
TABLE 11: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS 0F THE A TTRIB UTES OF
16 SERIES UP ROOMS
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE
S SATISFACT NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFACT NEUTRA DISSATISFA
TOTAL TOTAL
ION L CTION ION L CTION
52 8 7 25 4 4
DÉCOR OF 67 33
ROOM (77.60%) (11.90%) (10.40%) (75.70%) (12.10%) (12.10%)
48 10 9 18 8 7
QUALITY OF 67 33
ROOM (71.60%) (14.90%) (13.40%) (54.50%) (24.20%) (21.10%)
QUALITY OF 63 2 2 21 6 6
HOUSEKEEP 67 33
ING (94.00%) (2.98%) (2.98%) (63.60%) (18.10%) (18.10%)
46 11 10 24 5 4
MAINTENEN 67 33
CE (68.60%) (16.40%) (14.90%) (72.70%) (15.15%) (12.10%)
54 8 5 28 3 2
IN-ROOM 67 33
DINING (80.50%) (11.90%) (7.50%) (84.80%) (9.09%) (6.06%)
60 5 2 20 7 6
APPEARANC 67 33
E OF HOTEL (89.50%) (7.46%) (2.98%) (60.60%) (21.20%) (18.10%)
53 7 7 19 9 5
VALUE FOR 67 33
MONEY (79.10%) (10.40%) (10.40%) (57.50%) (27.20%) (15.15%)
56 6 5 23 5 5
RECOMMEN 67 33
DATION (83.50%) (8.90%) (7.50%) (69.60%) (15.15%) (15.15%)
OVERALL 57 5 5 27 4 2
SATISFACTI 67 33
ON (85.00%) (7.50%) (7.50%) (81.80%) (12.10%) (6.06%)
79
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 16 series up rooms. The
satisfaction level of decor of room was 77.6% for male respondents and
75.7% for female respondents. The satisfaction level of quality of room was
71.6% for male respondents and for females it was 54.5% which was low
comparatively. The satisfaction level of quality of housekeeping of male
respondents was 94% and for female respondents it was 63.3% which was
comparatively very low. The dissatisfaction was 18.1 % which was high in
this case. The dissatisfaction level of maintenance was high in male
respondents 14.9% and for female respondents was 72.7%. The in-room
dinning in both the cases was high i.e. 80.5% and 84.8% respectively. The
overall satisfaction for male respondents was 85% and for female
respondents it was 81.8%, which was high in both the cases.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of male respondents
relating to the appearance of hotel and female respondents relating to the
quality of in-room dinning was the highest. The dissatisfaction level of male
respondents in quality of maintenance and for female respondents the quality
of room was the highest.
80
GRAPH 11.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES UP ROOMS.
16 SERIES UP MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
81
GRAPH 11.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES UP ROOMS.
16 SERIES UP FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
82
TABLE 12: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFA NEUTRA DISSATISFA
S TOTAL TOTAL
CTION L CTION CTION L CTION
58 4 2 26 3 2
DÉCOR OF 64 31
ROOM (90.60%) (6.20%) (3.10%) (83.80%) (9.60%) (6.50%)
60 4 0 20 7 4
QUALITY OF 64 31
ROOM (93.70%) (6.20%) (0%) (64.50%) (22.50%) (12.90%)
QUALITY OF 59 4 1 24 4 3
HOUSEKEEP 64 31
ING (92.10%) (6.20%) (1.50%) (77.40%) (12.90%) (9.60%
54 7 3 19 7 5
MAINTENEN 64 31
ANCE (84.30%) (10.90%) (4.60%) (61.20%) (22.50%) (16.10%)
53 7 4 18 8 5
IN-ROOM 64 31
DINING (82.80%) (10.90%) (6.20%) (58.06%) (25.80%) (16.10%)
50 8 6 24 5 2
APPEARANC 64 31
E OF HOTEL (78.10%) (12.50%) (9.30%) (77.40%) (16.10%) (6.50%)
53 8 3 20 8 3
VALUE FOR 64 31
MONEY (82.80%) (12.50%) (4.60%) (64.50%) (25.80%) (9.60%)
51 7 6 16 12 6
RECOMMEN 64 31
DATION (69.60%) (10.90%) (9.30%) (51.60%) (38.70%) (19.30%)
OVERALL 57 5 2 24 6 4
SATISFACTI 64 31
ON (89.06%) (7.80%) (3.10%) (77.40%) (19.30%) (12.90%)
83
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 17 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents relating to the quality of room
was 90.6% and for female respondents it was 83.8%, which was very high.
Satisfaction level of male respondent for quality of room was 93.7% and
dissatisfaction level was nil. For female respondents the dissatisfaction level
had been high 12.9% and quality of housekeeping was also high. It was
92.1% for male respondents and for female respondents it was 77.4% and
12.9% were neutral. The quality of housekeeping for male respondents was
92.1%, which was relatively high compared to female respondents. The
dissatisfaction level had been high, which was 16.1%. The satisfaction level
of male respondents for quality of in-room dinning had also been high which
was 82.8% and was low for female respondents at 58.06%. The satisfaction
level for the appearance of the hotel was the same in both the cases. The
overall satisfaction for male respondents was 89.06% and for females it was
77.4%.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of male respondents
relating to quality of room and for female respondents relating to the decor
of room was the highest. The dissatisfaction was high relating to the
appearance of hotel in both the cases.
84
GRAPH 12.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
85
GRAPH 12.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Appearance of hotel
Attributes
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
86
TABLE 13: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 17 SERIES UP
ROOMS.
64 5 3 27 1 0
QUALITY OF 72 28
ROOM (88.80%) (6.94%) (4.16%) (96.40%) (3.50%) (0.00%)
QUALITY OF 67 3 2 21 5 2
HOUSEKEEP 72 28
ING (93.10%) (4.16%) (2.70%) (75.00%) (17.80%) (7.10%)
58 8 6 19 5 4
MAINENANC 72 28
E (80.50%) (11.10%) (8.30%) (67.80%) (17.80%) (14.20%)
60 6 6 20 6 2
IN-ROOM 72 28
DINING (83.30%) (8.30%) (8.30%) (71.40%) (21.40%) (7.10%)
65 6 1 18 5 5
APPEARANC 72 28
E OF HOTEL (90.27%) (8.30%) (1.30%) (64.20%) (17.80%) (17.80%)
64 4 4 16 7 5
VALUE FOR 72 28
MONEY (88.80%) (5.50%) (5.50%) (57.10%) (25.00%) (17.80%)
68 2 2 23 3 2
RECOMMEA 72 28
NDATION (94.40%) (2.70%) (2.70%) (82.10%) (10.70%) (7.10%)
OVERALL 67 3 2 17 7 4
SATISFACTI 72 28
ON (93.10%) (4.16%) (2.70%) (60.70%) (25.00%) (14.20%)
87
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 17 series up rooms. The
satisfaction level of male respondents of decor of the rooms was 94.4% and
the female respondents were 85.7%, which was high in both the cases. The
quality of rooms for male respondents was 88.8% and for female it was
96.4% which was also very high. The dissatisfaction level was also nil in
this case. The male respondents’ quality of housekeeping was 93.1% and for
females it was 75%, 17.8% was neutral and 7.1% was dissatisfaction. The
maintenance for female respondents was 67.8%. The dissatisfaction was
very high, which was 14.2%. The in-room dinning of male respondents was
83.3%, 8.3% was neutral and 8.3% was dissatisfaction. For female
respondents satisfaction level was 71.4%, 21.4% was neutral and 7.1% was
dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of male respondents relating to
appearance of hotel was 90.27%, which was very high, and 1.3% was
dissatisfaction, which was very low. The female respondents’ satisfaction
percentage was 64.2%, 17.8% was neutral and 17.8% was dissatisfaction.
The value for money paid in both the cases was high. The overall
satisfaction for male respondents was 93.1% and for female respondents it
was 60.7%and dissatisfaction was 14.2%.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction percentage of male respondents
in decor of room and female respondents in quality of room was highest.
The dissatisfaction level of quality of maintenance was highest in both the
cases.
88
GRAPH 13.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES UP ROOMS.
17 SERIES UP MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
89
GRAPH 13.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES UP ROOMS.
17 SERIES UP FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
90
TABLE 14: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
18 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFAC NEUTRA DISSATISFA SATISFACT DISSATISFA
TOTAL NEUTRAL TOTAL
S TION L CTION ION CTION
DÉCOR OF 65 6 5 20 3 1
76 24
ROOM (85.50%) (7.89%) (6.57%) (83.30%) (12.50%) (4.10%)
QUALITY OF 60 11 5 21 2 1
76 24
ROOM (78.90%) (14.40%) (6.57%) (87.00%) (8.30%) (4.10%)
QUALTIY OF 58 10 8 18 4 2
HOUSEKEEPI 76 24
NG
(76.31%) (13.15%) (10.50%) (75.00%) (16.70%) (8.30%)
MAINTENAN 70 4 2 16 6 2
76 24
CE (92.10%) (5.26%) (2.63%) (66.70%) (25.00%) (8.30%)
IN-ROOM 69 6 1 17 5 2
76 24
DINING (90.70%) (7.89%) (1.30%) (70.80%) (20.80%) (8.30%)
APPEARANC 56 15 5 15 6 3
76 24
E OF HOTEL (73.60%) (19.70%) (6.57%) (62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)
VALUE FOR 54 19 3 13 7 4
76 24
MONEY (71.10%) (25.00%) (3.90%) (54.10%) (29.10%) (16.70%)
REOMMEND 61 8 7 14 8 2
76 24
ATION (80.30%) (10.50%) (9.21 %) (58.30%) (33.30%) (8.30%)
OVERALL 57 14 5 22 2 0
SATISFACTIO 76 24
N
(75%) (18.40%) (6.50%) (91.70%) (8.30%) (0.00%)
91
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 18 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents of decor of room was 85.5%,
7.89% was neutral and 6.57% was dissatisfaction. The female respondents’
satisfaction level was 83.3%, 12.5% was neutral and 4.1% was
dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of quality of room of male respondents
was 78.9% and for females it was high in both the cases. The satisfaction
level of quality of housekeeping of male respondents was 76.31%, 13.15%
neutral, which was high. For female respondents it was 75% satisfaction,
16.7% was neutral, which was high, and 8.3% dissatisfaction. Satisfaction
level of male respondents of quality of maintenance was highest i.e. 92.7%
but for female respondents it was 66.7% and 25% was neutral which was a
very high percentage. The dissatisfaction level of appearance of hotel of
female respondents was high at 12.5% for and male respondents it was
6.57%. The overall satisfaction level of male respondents was 75% which
was low and 18.4% was neutral. For female respondents, satisfaction
percentage was 91. 7% and dissatisfaction was nil.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that satisfaction level of male respondents in quality
of maintenance and the female respondents in overall satisfaction was the
highest. The dissatisfaction level of male respondents in quality of
housekeeping and female respondents in appearance of hotel was the
highest.
92
GRAPH 14.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 18 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
93
GRAPH 14.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 18 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
94
TABLE 15: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
18 SERIES UP ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTE SATISFA
NEUTRAL DISSATISFA TOTAL
SATISFA NEUTR DISSATISFA
TOTAL
S CTION CTION CTION AL CTION
60 2 2 33 2 1
DÉCOR OF 64 36
ROOM (93.70%) (3.10%) (3.10%) (91.70%) (5.50%) (2.70%)
61 3 1 31 3 2
QUALITY OF 64 36
ROOM (95.30%) (4.60%) (1.50%) (86.10%) (8.30%) (5.50%)
QUALITY OF 63 1 0 29 4 3
HOUSEKEEP 64 36
ING (98.40%) (1.50%) (0.00%) (80.50%) (11.10%) (8.30%)
55 5 4 31 3 2
MAINTENAN 64 36
CE (85.90%) (7.80%) (6.20%) (86.10%) (8.30%) (5.50%)
51 7 6 23 8 5
IN-ROOM 64 36
DINING (79.60%) (10.90%) (9.30%) (63.80%) (22.20%) (13.80%)
49 10 5 19 9 8
APPEARANC 64 36
E OF HOTEL (76.50%) (15.60%) (7.80%) (52.70%) (25%) (22.20%)
56 6 2 30 6 0
VALUE FOR 64 36
MONEY (87.50%) (9.30%) (3.10%) (83.30%) (16.60%) (0.00%)
59 4 1 27 5 4
RECOMMEN 64 36
DATION (92.10%) (6.20%) (1.50%) (75.00%) (13.80%) (11.10%)
OVERALL 57 5 2 22 10 4
SATISFACTI 64 36
ON (89.00%) (7.80%) (3.10%) (61.10%) (27.70%) (11.10%)
95
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 18 series up rooms. The
satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 93.7%, neutral was 3.1% and
dissatisfaction was 3.1%. For the female respondents the satisfaction level of
decor of room was 91.7%, which was very high, 5.5% was neutral and 2.7%
was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the room
was 95.3%, 4.6% was neutral and 1.5% was dissatisfaction for the male
respondents. 86.9% was satisfaction, 8.3% was neutral and 5.5% was
dissatisfaction, which was low for the female respondents. The satisfaction
level of housekeeping for the male respondents was 98.4% and for female
respondents it was 80.5%, which was very high. The service received for the
value of money paid was high in both male and female respondents. Overall
satisfaction had been high for male respondents at 89%, 7.8% was neutral
and 3.1% was dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the satisfaction level
was 61.1%, 27.7% was neutral and 11.1% was dissatisfaction, which was
high comparatively.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male and female respondents, satisfaction
level of quality of housekeeping and decor of room was highest.
Dissatisfaction level for quality of in-room dinning was the highest for male
and appearance of hotel was the highest for female respondents.
96
GRAPH 15.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 18 SERIES UP ROOMS.
18 SERIES UP MALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
97
GRAPH 15.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 18 SERIES UP ROOMS.
18 SERIES UP FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
Overall satisfaction
Recommendation
Value for money
Attributes
Appearance of hotel
In-room dining
Maintenance
Quality of housekeeping
Quality of room
Decor of room
Percentage
98
CHAPTER – 5
SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS,
CONCLUSION
AND
SUGGESTIONS
99
INTRODUCTION
This chapter consists of the summary of all the findings got through
tabulating the tables and drawing the graphs, the conclusion arrived at and
the suggestions or recommendations given. This chapter tries to give a
summary of all the findings and conclusion.
The conclusion is based upon the objectives of the study. The customer
satisfaction towards room service of Le Meridien, Bangalore is tried to be
understood from the tables and is put down in words in this chapter. This
chapter also includes the findings regarding the overall satisfaction
experienced by customers and the service which is doing best.
Based on all the findings got from the tables, the conclusion is drawn upon
and suitable recommendations or suggestions are given which is compile din
this chapter. The findings and conclusion is arrived upon based on the
analysis of the tables which is given in the previous chapter.
100
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. The majority of the respondents are males and they are from the
corporate sector.
4. The male respondents stay is usually for 1 day as the purpose of visit
is usually for business, while the female respondents for more than 4-
5 nights as the purpose of their visit are usually for leisure.
101
5. The satisfaction level of all the attributes is relatively high in 11 series
rooms. The satisfaction level of appearance of the hotel is the highest
in male and female respondents. The dissatisfaction level of male and
female respondents is highest in the in-room dinning.
102
10. In 16 series down rooms the male respondents’ satisfaction level for
quality of housekeeping and for female respondents the decor of the
room is the highest. The dissatisfaction level of quality of
maintenance is high in both the cases.
103
15. In the 18 series up rooms, the male and female respondents’
satisfaction level of quality of housekeeping and decor of room is
highest. The dissatisfaction level for quality of in-room dinning is the
highest for male respondents and appearance of hotel is the highest for
female respondents.
104
CONCLUSION
A hotel, where the product is already designed and fixed, the prices cannot
be changed often and the distribution is limited to selected outlets. It is the
marketing communication which is the most significant component of the
marketing activity of any hotel organization.
105
SUGGESTIONS
3. Since the main kitchen is little far from the 11 series rooms, the food
gets cold by the time it is served. To avoid this, the hotel can have a
small pantry where they can heat food before serving it.
106
ANNEXURE
107
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES
The World Wide Web was used to retrieve information from the following
sites:
www.lemeridien.com
www.lemeridien-bangalore.com
REFERENCES:
BOOKS REFERRED:
108
LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. NAME :
2. ADDRESS :
3. ROOM NO. :
4. GENDER : M F
Business Leisure
Conference Personal
6. REGULARITY OF VISIT :
First time Repeat
7. LENGTH OF STAY :
1 Night 2-4 nights
5 or more nights
109
8. PLEASE RATE THE FOLLOWING:
Excellent Average Fair
110