Explore Search

Search document 1 of 1 Download

SSS vs. CA Case Digest

More info

Myla Ruth N. Sara

SSS vs. CA

FACTS:

SSS and petitioners filed with the Social Security Commission seeking to be declared as employees of
COSMOS. The petitioners here are peddlers of Mafinco. Mafinco contended that they are independent contractors.

ISSUE:
W/N there exists an employer-employee relationship

HELD:
No. Under the peddling contract, Mafinco would provide the peddler with a delivery truck and the peddler is
responsible for compensation of his driver and helpers. In addition, the peddler would also bear the cost of gasoline
and maintenance of the truck and secure their licenses and permits. The petitioner would also post a cash bond
and the contract may be terminated upon 5 days prior notice.

On the basis of the peddling contract, no employer-employee relationship was created. Thus, the petitioner
is an independent contractor.

Documents Similar To SSS vs. CA Case Digest

Labor Case Digest PNB v. CIR Chavez vs PCGG Case Social Security System Veterans Manp
Digest Employees Association… Vscourt of App
CA

More From unbeatable38

Insular Life vs NLRC Guarin vs. NLRC Case MAM Realty Insular Life vs. NLRC Case Sevilla vs. CA C
March 12, 1998 Case… Digest Development vs. NLRC… Digest Nov. 15, 1989
Digest Case Digest

ABOUT SUPPORT

About Scribd Help / FAQ

Press Accessibility

Our blog Purchase help

Join our team! AdChoices

Contact Us Publishers

Join today

Invite Friends

Gifts

LEGAL

Terms

Privacy

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Scribd Inc. . Browse Books . Site Directory . Site Language: English