Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 36

1 of 36

Dynamic Structure Between AI and Biological Life


Ian Beardsley

Copyright © 2019 by Ian Beardsley

2 of 36

3 of 36

4 of 36

Early on, about 2007 (Beardsley, Cosmic Archaeology, 2007, ISBN: 978-0-595-47083-9) I
suggested artificial intelligence (AI) should have the golden ratio (PHI) or its conjugate (phi) in its
means geometric arithmetic, and harmonic (by molar mass):

Where Si (silicon) is one of the core semiconductor materials used to make AI circuitry, and P
(phosphorus) and B (boron) are central semiconductor doping agents.

It was not until around 2016 (Beardsley, 2016, The AI Cookbook, ISBN: 978-1-365-15740-0)
that I wrote it like this:

It wasn’t until around 2016 (Beardsley, Artificial Intelligence 2016, ISBN: 978-365-50200-2)
when I noticed that the ratio of the central biological elements (C, N, O, H) to the central AI
elements (Si, P, B) were approximately phi, as well (by molar mass).

5 of 36

It was at this point that I realized that there was a dynamic connection between artificial
intelligence and biological life which was:

I wrote this as:

Where HNCO is isocyanic acid, the most basic organic compound. I then wrote in the
arithmetic mean:

I then guessed that since there was P/Si + B/Si + 1 there should be Ga/Ge + As/Ge +1 since
Ge (germanium) is a central semiconductor material as well (first generation, Si second), and
gallium (Ga) and Arsenic (As) are central doping agents like P and B. This worked out nice:

6 of 36

And this was further nice, because around 2017 (Beardsley, AI And The Natural Life Elements,
2017, ISBN: 978-1-387-36728-3) I compared the ratio between the two factors, and found it
was equal to Zn/Se, were ZnSe is zinc selenide, an intrinsic semiconductor and thus a central
feature to AI. It later turned out to be central to further discoveries. Thus I wrote:

Finally allowing the ultimate expression:

It was at this point for which I sought to where I could find the elements for which the equation
worked nearly perfectly, so I could replace the approximately equal to, to an equal to. I got it
right on the first guess. I guessed since recurrent has been the form x/z+y/z+1, as in

P/Si+B/Si+1 and Ga/Ge+As/Ge+1 that it would be of that form. And, I guessed the
components to that form were H2O (water), CH4 (methane), and NH3 (ammonia) because
these mixed together make amino acids, the building blocks of life (MIller-Urey Experiment).

7 of 36

This was around 2018 (Beardsley, Artificial Intelligence Is Connected to Evolution, 2018, ISBN:

I found in that same year, same book, that the same could be done for first generation
semiconductor material Ge and central doping agents, Ga, and As, except with unity as
opposed with phi. Also using CHNOPS, the most abundant biological elements by mass:

8 of 36

It was in this work that I made the guess that evolution of AI parallels the evolution of biological
life. I made the guess that primitive computers would have mathematical connections to the
primordial biological life elements. This guess worked on the first try. Since primitive
computers were vacuum tubes with tungsten filaments (W) as the cathodes and were encased
in basically silica (SiO2, or glass), I was happy to see that:

9 of 36

It is now March 17, 2019 and I guess if the Universe is to be sublime, it should be elegant,
exciting and, designed with sublime aesthetics, which is what I have always done in this
project, and it has always panned out, that if

has perfection in the precursors of the amino acids as


should have perfection for some aspect of biological components. Since Ga/Ge+As/Ge+1 is
approximately three, and Ga/Si+As/Si+1 is approximately 6, it is in other things. One might
hazard to guess, since the former is in the amino acids, the latter will be in the sugars and the
monomer of the sugars, that are a big part of the biological, ribose, deoxyribose,
glyceraldehyde, and formaldehyde used to make glyceraldehyde, ribose, and DNA and RNA,
the instructions for biological life. It turns out it is:

Thus, where silicon is associated with the amino acids, germanium is associated with the DNA
and RNA.

10 of 36

11 of 36

We talked about the primordial precursors to the amino acids and the precursors to the
sugars of RNA and DNA

In their connection AI, but what about the amino acids themselves, the building blocks
of life?

12 of 36

It becomes important to look at air as a mixture. It is about 25% oxygen gas (O2) and
75% nitrogen gas (N2) by volume, giving it an accepted value of 29.0 grams per mole:

13 of 36

14 of 36

I would like to suggest that the prebiotic chemistry might have been passed through an
activation function that disappeared after life was on its way to evolving.

The problem, then, of answering the question of how life began is one of finding the activation
function and its mechanism by which it takes prebiotic chemistry and activates it (makes it
alive) so it can now self-replicate, and evolve. We assume that as this mechanism activates the
molecules, its mechanism depletes as it activates from what is available. In this sense the
mechanism is a limiting reactant, so it determines how much material is activated before it
depletes completely.

Logically, the way to determine what this mechanism is, and how it serves as an activation
function is to look for the by products of the reaction that are left over, and from that, deduce
its nature.

To do this, we have to look for that thing in our knowledge of the Earth’s history that does not
make sense. This would be in the faint young star paradox. We know that five billion years ago,
when the Earth and Sun first formed, that the sun was 0.7 times its present output and so, the
Earth should have been frozen over, yet, we know it was not. That it had water in its liquid
phase. Thus something was there that is not present today. That something must have been
the mechanism for the activation function that “turned on” prebiotic chemistry.

I have presented it like this because 1) Life has not been created in the laboratory from scratch
2) New life does not seem to be originating on earth in present times. Therefore, the activation
function is probably not present on Earth today and more than likely disappeared, or depleted
after activating prebiotic chemistry. Life exists, yet we do not know how prebiotic substances
organize into self-replicating systems that evolve. Therefore, we must look for something
concerning the Earth that does not make sense. I suggest that would be the young star
paradox. If the Earth had water in its liquid phase when it should have been frozen over, then
something could have existed then that was a limiting reactant, or something like it, that
activated prebiotic substances, in that it was responsible for warming the earth (perhaps a heat
retaining substance). Also, we do not know what dark matter is. Could it be the prebiotic
material, x? Or, could it even be responsible for the activation function?

Ian Beardsley

September 2, 2018

15 of 36

16 of 36
17 of 36

18 of 36

19 of 36

20 of 36

21 of 36

22 of 36

23 of 36

24 of 36

25 of 36

26 of 36

27 of 36

28 of 36

29 of 36

30 of 36

31 of 36

32 of 36

33 of 36

34 of 36

The equations are,…

35 of 36

36 of 36

The Author