Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT
MACHINE DESIGN
10.1.8. Separating screw for the lid and the body of the gearbox: ........................ 57
REFERENCES: ............................................................................................................... 59
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Our group would like to express my deep gratitude to Professor Le Khanh Dien, our research
supervisor, for his useful critiques, enthusiastic encouragement and valuable suggestions during
the planning and development of this research work. His willingness to give his time so
generously has been very much appreciated.
We would also like to extend my thanks for all of my friends in class CC16CDT and CC16CK2
for their help in offering me the resource.
Finally, we wish to thank our parents for their support and encouragement throughout my study.
CHAPTER 1: PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1. ABSTRACTS:
Agriculture is the backbone of Vietnam, where the labor shortage is the problem that almost all
farmers had to face. In today's world we required faster productivity in less time. Meanwhile,
sugarcane is one of the major economic crops in Vietnam. It is used as a raw material in sugar
manufacturing. Generally, farmer groups are a small-farming groups (1 to 3 ha). The agriculture
relies heavily on human labor which results in low productivity per area of per labor so it wastes
a lot of time on working process and also the quality of output product. Human labor shortage
tends to be a serious problem in the challenge list of rapid agricultural industrial development.
Result in development of the agricultural machinery used to harvest.
The cutting mechanism is the significant part of any harvesting machine, and for sugarcane
harvester, the cutting mechanisms are designed based on two main systems: cutter-bar cutting
1
system and rotating cutting system (Patil and Patil, 2013). Rotating cutting mechanism with
blades is used more often than cutter-bar cutting mechanism for thick stalks (such as sugarcane)
that have more cutting resistance. During time of research, we meet some drawback in redesign
these kind of mechanism in our machine cause by the lack of technology in part processing such
as bevel gear or cutting base, etc. we use chainsaw mechanism as replacement method instead.
The feeding and discharging mechanism of the machine will replace as the conveyor to transfer
the cut one to a wedge, with the help of a big knockdown roller.
1. Cutting
mechanism
2. Knockdown roller
3. Conveyor
4. Wheel
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘. 𝑏. 𝐻. 𝑣𝑓 (2)
where:
𝑃𝑟 - input cutting power (W)
𝐹𝑟 - cutting force (N)
𝑘 - specific cutting work in crosscut sawing of dry pine (MJ.m-3) (Tab. 1)
𝑏 - saw kerf width (m)
𝐻 - saw kerf height (m)
𝑣𝑓 – feeding velocity (m/s)
𝑣 – chain velocity (m/s)
2
With
𝑘 = 𝑘𝑏𝑜𝑟 . 𝐾𝑑 . 𝐾𝑤 . 𝐾𝑟
Where:
𝑘𝑏𝑜𝑟 - specific cutting work in cross pine sawing of dry pine (MJ.m-3)
𝐾𝑑 , 𝐾𝑤 - correction coefficients representing the impact of tree species and their moisture
content.
𝐾𝑟 - correction coefficients representing the impact of blunting.
We got 𝑘 ≈ 𝑘𝑏𝑜𝑟 when 𝐾𝑑 . 𝐾𝑤 . 𝐾𝑟 = 0.9 ÷ 1.5 (Mikleš and Holík, 2005). In the other hand, Tab.
The specific cutting work in cross pine sawing of dry pine for various type of chain from
8 ÷ 18 𝑚𝑚 kerf width are variation around 10 × 10−3 ÷ 30 × 10−3 𝐽. 𝑚𝑚−3. Meanwhile, the
specific cutting work for sugarcane stalk is about 8.7 × 10−3 𝐽. 𝑚𝑚−3 (Somjet and Thanya,
2016) as peak cutting force. So that, by referent some data of commercial chainsaw product, we
can apply these data to redesign the chainsaw mechanism for cutting part without a deeply study
on cutting properties of sugarcane stalk when using a chainsaw.
3
-For saw chain, our option is find it on the market, the machine will have long guide bar, and the
saw with 3/8” pitch is the most popular one, which support long bar and sell as long chain roll in
the market (100FT), that make our machine is easily for attachment and repair.
-Otherwise, because of sugarcane grow as bush cane, so the chain bar have to get the length
about 30 − 40 𝑐𝑚 to make sure all cane could be cut. Furthermore, What is the relationship
between Bar length and Cutting Power? In fact, the chainsaw which support long chain bar have
bigger output power than the shorter one, the reason is people use the long chain bar for the
cutting the tree or workpiece have a great cross section, therefore the increasing in Power to
make sure the cutting performance is constant and gain some more power to pull the chain.
From eq. 1 and eq. 2, we have the cutting force rely on the chain speed, but the output power
doesn’t. Overview, in this work, have been used different machines, which represent the most
advanced technology available for operators, provided from the market. Small chainsaws were
selected, since light compact equipment, are necessary for pruning with very short bars, because
of the diameter of the branches cut that rarely exceeds 10-15 cm, meanwhile the diameter of a
sugarcane stalk is about 2-4cm as diameter. At the same time, a quick look as power is
necessary, to cut easily sugarcane stem
Technical data
Pellenc Selion Pellenc Selion
Feature U.M. C15 C20 Stihl MS200T
Power kW 1.5 at 5400 rpm 2 at 6200 rpm 1.7
Chain speed m/s 10.3 14.4 26
Guide bar cm 30 30 35
Oregon ¼ Micro Oregon ¼ Micro
Saw chain 3/8 P
Chisel 25AP Chisel 25AP
From these data, it can clearly be seen that the output power and the chain speed of these types at
between 1.5-2 kW and varies from 10.3-26 respectively.
4
1.2.2. Conveyor system:
-Overview about conveyor:
Belt conveyors are most commonly used in transportation of bulk materials (grain, salt, coal, ore,
sand, etc.).
Belt conveyors have attained a dominant position in transporting bulk materials due to a number
of inherent advantages like the economy and safety of operation, reliability, versatility and
practically unlimited range of capacities. In addition, they are suitable for performing numerous
processing functions while supporting a continuous flow of material between operations.
The capacity of belt conveyor depends on speed, shape and width of belt, method of feeding and
solid properties. Belt conveyor are the most common form of material handling system used in
manufacturing and mining industries thermal plants and in construction projects.
-History of conveyor:
Primitive conveyor belts were used since the 19th century. In 1892, Thomas Robins began a
series of inventions which led to the development of a conveyor belt used for carrying coal, ores
and other products. In 1901, Sandvik invented and started the production of steel conveyor belts.
In 1905, Richard Sutcliffe invented the first conveyor belts for use in coal mines which
revolutionized the mining industry. In 1913, Henry Ford introduced conveyor-belt assembly
lines at Ford Motor Company's Highland Park, Michigan factory. In 1972, the French society
REI created in New Caledonia the longest straight-belt conveyor in the world, at a length of
13.8 km. Hyacynthe Marcel Bocchetti was the concept designer. In 1957, the B. F. Goodrich
Company patented a conveyor belt that it went on to produce as the Turnover Conveyor Belt
System. Incorporating a half-twist, it had the advantage over conventional belts of a longer life
because it could expose all of its surface area to wear and tear. Mobius strip belts are no longer
manufactured because untwisted modern belts can be made more durable by constructing them
from several layers of different materials. In 1970, Intralox, a Louisiana-based company,
registered the first patent for all plastic, modular belting.
Conveyors used in industrial settings include tripping mechanisms such as trip cords along the
length of the conveyor. This allows for workers to immediately shut down the conveyor when a
5
problem arises. Warning alarms are included to notify employees that a conveyor is about to turn
on.
We would like to send our most sincere appreciation for Dr. Lê Khánh Điền for guiding and
supporting us during our time of completing this project.
Because of our own inexperience and limited knowledge, despite consulting references such as
books, websites or previous projects, mistakes were unavoidable. We look forward to hearing
your comments and judgements on this report to improve ourselves and our future projects.
Calculation:
Choosing motor, transmission ratio
Spur gear drive
Chain drive
Shafts, keys, bearings
Belt conveyor
Chainsaw mechanism
Technical drawing:
Drafting
AutoCAD
6
CHAPTER 2: CUTTING MECHANISM DESIGN
2.1. OVERVIEW:
From the reference data above, choose 1.5kW as output power and 10.3 m/s as chain speed,
connect motor directly to shaft, therefore:
𝑛. 𝑍. 𝑝𝑐
𝑣𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑛 =
60000
Where:
𝑣𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑛 : Chain speed (m/s)
𝑛: The speed of motor (rpm)
𝑍 : Number of sprocket teeth
𝑝𝑐 : The chain pitch (mm)
The target chain speed is about 10.3 m/s (9.7 m/s ~ 10.6 m/s) , so that we got:
1 1
𝑛. 𝑍 = 60000 × 𝑣𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑖𝑛 × = 60000 × 10.3 × = 64881.88976
𝑝𝑐 3
8 × 25.4
We got:
7
The picture is the sketch of the
cutting mechanism of our machine,
where the part draw as the drive
chain part is the chain saw part.
Reference V-Ribbed Belts (Đai nhiều chêm) calculation of DRB Design Manual, we got:
Step 1:
The power requirement for the drive:
8
Figure from DRB® Design Manual
for Power Transmission Belts
Choose the service factor is 1.3 for 3-8 hours Seasonal with Crusher characteristics, no use of
idler pulley, therefore:
For the transmission, the transmission power efficiency of around 94% due to a pair of bearing
and the belt drive.
Choose electric motor 3K112S2 2.2kW and provide 2850 rpm of Hanoi Electromechanical
Manufacturing JSC (efficiency 83% + 34kg weight for flange mounting).
9
Figure from HANOI
ELECTROMECHANICAL
MANUFACTURING JSC
Step 2:
Select the proper V-Ribbed Belt Section:
With the Speed of small Pulley reach 9975 rpm for the small pulley, and the horsepower of the
system is 2.2kW < 5kW.
Then,
Choose J type (or PJ in some manufacturer)
10
Step 3:
Select the Pulley Combination, Belt Length and Center Distance
With the J Belt Type, the recommended Pulley Diameter is 31.5 mm, choose d1 = 31.5 mm
The diameter of large pulley:
𝑛1 9269
𝑛2
𝑑2 = 𝑑1 × = 31.5 × 2850 = 104.53 [1]
(1 − 𝜀) 1 − 0.02
Choose d2 = 100 mm
We got the new ratio = 3.17 is allowable ratio in comparison with the ratio between n1 and n2
(97%~103%)
Where:
𝐾 = 4𝐿𝑝 − 2𝜋(𝑑1 + 𝑑2 )
𝐿𝑝 : 𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑡 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ (𝑚𝑚)
𝐶: 𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 (𝑚𝑚)
𝑑1 , 𝑑2 : 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑦
Step 4:
Calculate the Number of Belt Ribs: (this formula is similar with the formula 4.16 in [1] )
𝑃𝑑
𝑁= [2]
𝑃𝑟 × 𝐾𝜃 × 𝐾𝑙
11
Where:
N : Number of ribs(EA)
Pd : Design power(kW)
Pr : Basic power rating per rib (kW/Rib)
Kθ : Arc of contact correction factor
Kθ=0.95
570
𝛼 = 1800 − (𝑑2 − 𝑑1 ) × = 160.360 [1]
𝐶
Kl=0.89
12
Where l = 610mm
Pr = 0.24+0.07 = 0.31
So that,
1.95
𝑁= = 7.52
0.31 × 0.89 × 0.94
So that, the number of rib is N=8
13
For roller: ISO designation for PJ belt drive sprocket:
Material: Gray cast iron
Diameter db: Small: 31.5 mm ; Large: 100 mm;
Groove Spacing: e = 2.34 mm ± 0.03 mm;
fmin = 1.8 mm;
Groove angle α = 400 ± 0.050;
Top radius ra min = 0.2 mm;
Bottom radius ri max = 0.4 mm;
Face width (min) = 19.98 mm
For belt:
Ribbed belt with section type J
Number of rib: 8
Belt length: 610 mm
14
2.3. DESIGN OF SHAFT:
Drive shaft:
With:
D = 28; F= 8; GA = 31
Driven shaft:
We have the belt tension force is determined with the following formula:
𝑃𝑑
𝐹0 = 780 × + 0.1 × 𝑞𝑚10 × 𝑧 × 𝑣 2 = 123.324 (𝑁)
𝑣 × 𝐾𝛼
Where:
Pd = 1.95 kW ;
Cα = Kθ = 0.95 (Arc of contact correction factor);
z: Number of gib (z=8)
qm10 : mass of a 1 meter 10 gib belt (take qm10 = 0.09 kg/m, which 0.09 is the mass of belt type
K, type J is lighter)
v: belt drive velocity, determined as: v = π x d2 x n2/60000 = 14.9226 m/s. (drive pulley)
Fv: tangential force (Fv=0.1 x q x z x v2 = 16.83 N)
15
Choose Steel Class A., Name C45,
With allowable shear stress σ = 600 MPa; allowable torsional stress [τ ]= 12 .. 20 MPa
Preliminary calculate the shaft diameter using torque only, we have:
3 𝑇
𝑑≥√
0.2[𝜏]
With:
𝑃
𝑇 = 9.55 × 106 ×
𝑁
With [𝜏] is the allowable twisting moment MPa, choose CT5 mild steel as material with [𝜏] =
15
𝑑 ≥ 9.31
The tension force cause by belt drive
𝛼
𝐹𝑟 = 2 × 𝐹𝑜 × 𝑧 × sin ( ) = 168.914 (𝑁)
2
The tension force caused by chainsaw (Otto and Parmigiani)
𝜋 × 𝑇𝑀 𝜋 × 1935.8
𝐹𝑟 = = = 91.17 (𝑁)
𝑝×𝑧 3
8 × 25.4 × 7
Where:
Fr: The force acted on the shaft (N)
Tm: Drive-sprocket Torque (Nmm)
z: number of teeth of the sprocket
p: the chain pitch (mm)
Belt drive installation:
Consider 2 tension force is applied with the angle of 90 degree (in fact these two vectors applied
an angle >90 degree
2.4 BEARING SELECTION:
Dynamic equivalent load:
16
𝑄 = (𝑋𝑉𝐹𝑟 + 𝑌𝐹𝑎 )𝑘𝑡 𝑘𝑑
Where:
Fr : Centrifugal force ( Fr = 243.3 = √168.9142 + 91.172 )
Fa: Axial loading ( Known as weight of pulley, taper bushes, shaft and chainbar + chain in this
situation),
V: rotating factor (V=1 in case the inner ring rotate)
kt: temperature factor (set kt = 1 )
kd: load factor (light load and short term overload; kd =1.2)
Vertical shaft with Fr/Fa > 1.5, service in high rotation speed, so that, choose Angular Contact
Bearing Choose:
𝐹
X=1; Y=0, α = 150 ( keep 𝐹𝑎 ≤ 𝑒 )
𝑟
Q= 291.644 (N)
17
The chainsaw sprocket would fabricated following this
image, with 7 teeth and 3/8” pitch, inner diameter equal
14mm and 50mm for outer circle
18
CHAPTER 3: BELT CONVEYOR CALCULATION
_ Transport distance:
Length: L=13.4 m
Height: H=5 m
Angle: α = 22o
_Choose the number of layer i = 4 follow table 3.4 – [4], the thick of belt δ1 = 6 mm at
working surface and δ2 = 1,5 mm follow table 3.5 – [4]. Weight of 1m belt:
G 60 kg
q vl = = = 75 ⁄m
l + a 0,7 + 0,1
2
q vl = = 0.74(kg⁄m)
2.6 + 0.1
_ Conveyor capacity:
o Diameter: 0.108 m
o Distance between each in load path: lr = 0,3 m
Gcl = 7 × B + 4 = 8,55 kg
4 Driver shaft
Driven shaft
2
Picture 2.1
The conveyor works outdoor with heavy load, we choose ω = 0.035 (table 4.4 – [4])
20
S2 = S1 + W1−2
_ we have:
S1 = Sout
Follow table 2.1 – [4], when α = 180° Choosef = 0.2, efα = 1,87.
S1 = 130.75 kg
S2 = 179.34 kg
W2−3 = 12.55 kg
S3 = 191.89 kg
S4 = 244.50 kg
q b × l2r
Smin = = 13.41 kg
8 × f′
_ Traction force:
21
WT = S4 − S1 + Wdd = 750 kg
22
CHAPTER 4: CALCULATING AND CHOOSING MOTOR AND
DISTRIBUTING TRANSMISSION RATIO
4.1. CHOOSING MOTOR:
Efficiency of system:
η = ηl ηg 2 ηc ηbea 4
The efficiency of drives is chosen from table 3.3 of reference [1]:
ηl = 0,98 : coupling’s efficiency
ηg = 0,96: gear drive’s efficiency
ηc = 0,95: chain drive’s efficiency
ηbea = 0,99: bearings’ efficiency
η = 0,98. 0,962 . 0,95. 0,994 = 0,8242
Maximum power on chain drive’s shaft:
Ft v
Pmax = = (k1 Ln v + 15 × 10−4 × Q × L + 24 × 10−4 × Q × H)k 2 = 0.38 kW
1000
Relative power on chain drive’s shaft:
T 2
∑n1 ( i ) t i 12 . 20 + 0,72 . 20
√ T √
Pre = Pmax = Pmax = 4,4625 kW
∑n1 t i 20 + 20
uchain = 1
23
ufast stage = 5.98
nmotor 1370
u = uc uslow stage ufast stage = = = 19.57
nworking 70
PIII
PII = 0,96.0,99 = 0.425 kW
PII
PI = = 0.477 kW
0,96.0,99
1370
Ratio: u = = 19.57
70
24
Rotational speed on shafts:
Torsion on shafts:
PIII
TIII = 9,55. 106 . = 51732 Nmm
nIII
PII
TII = 9,55. 106 . = 27497.68 Nmm
nII
PI
TI = 9,55. 106 . = 11168.82Nmm
nI
Pcoupling
Tcoupling = 9,55. 106 . = 3325.07 Nmm
ncoupling
Pmotor
Tmotor = 9,55. 106 . = 3325.07 Nmm
nmotor
Table 4.1:
Parameter
Power P (kW) 0.55 0.477 0.425 0.404 0.38
25
CHAPTER 5: DESIGNING SPUR GEAR
5.2. CALCULATION:
Choose material
Allowable stress:
T 3 20 0,7T 3 20
NHE1 = 60 × 1370 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 132.47 × 106
40 T 40
T 3 20 0,7T 3 20
NHE2 = 60 × 363.40 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 35.14 × 106
40 T 40
6 N
→ K HL2 = √NHO2 = 0.79
HE2
o Contact fatigue limit according to the number of basis working cycles (t6.2)
σ0Hlim1 = 2 × 200 + 70 = 470
σ0Hlim2 = 2 × 185 + 70 = 440
26
sH=1,1
0,9KHL1
o [σH1 ] = σ0Hlim1 = 249.95 MPa
sH
0,9KHL2
o [σH2 ] = σ0Hlim2 = 284.4 MPa
sH
[σH1 ]+[σH2 ]
→ Calculated contact stress: [σH ] = = 267.18 MPa
2
T 6 20 0,7T 6 20
NFE1 = 60 × 1 × 1370 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 110.24 × 106
40 T 40
cycles
T 6 20 0,7T 6 20
NFE2 = 60 × 1 × 363.40 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 29.24 × 106
40 T 40
cycles
o The number of basis working cycles: NFO=4 × 106
o NFE1>NFO1, NFE2>NFO2 therefore KFL1=1, KFL2=1
o From table 6.13 of [I], bending fatigue limit:
σ0F lim 1 = 1.8 × 200 = 360 MPa
σ0F lim 2 = 1.8 × 185 = 333MPa
sF=1.75
KFL1 .KFC1
o [σF1 ] = σ0Flim1 = 205.71 MPa
sF1
KFL2 .KFC2
o [σF2 ] = σ0Flim2 = 190.29 MPa
sF2
Calculate parameters:
27
According to standard, choose aw=70 mm
Choose m:
o m = (0,01 ÷0,02)aw=0.7÷1.4
Choose m=1.25
2a
w
Total number of teeth: z1 = m(u+1) = 23
z2 = u × z1 = 87
z
u = z2 = 3.78
1
Pitch diameter
o d1 = z1 m = 28.75 mm
o d2 = z2 m = 108.75 mm
Addendum diameter:
o da1 = d1 + 2m = 31.25 mm
o da2 = d2 + 2m = 111.25 mm
z1 +z2
Recalculate shaft distance: aw = m = 68.75 mm
2
Dedendum diameter
o da1 = d1 − 2m = 28.75mm
o da2 = d2 − 2m = 106.25 m
Teeth width: bw1 = ψba . aw + 5 = 32.5 mm and bw2 = ψba . aw = 27.5 mm
1πd n
Tangential velocity of gear: v = 60000 = 2.06 m/s
Fa1 = 0
28
ZM ZH Zε 2T1 KH (u+1)
o σH = √
dw bw u
29
CHAPTER 6: DESIGNING SPUR GEAR
6.2. CALCULATION:
Choose material
Allowable stress:
T 3 20 0,7T 3 20
NHE1 = 60 × 363.40 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 35.14 × 106
40 T 40
T 3 20 0,7T 3 20
NHE2 = 60 × 140.31 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 13.57 × 106
40 T 40
6 N
→ K HL1 = √NHO1 = 0,81
HE1
6 N
→ K HL2 = √NHO2 = 0.92
HE2
T 6 20 0,7T 6 20
NFE1 = 60 × 1 × 363.40 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 29.24 × 106
40 T 40
cycles
T 6 20 0,7T 6 20
NFE2 = 60 × 1 × 140.31 × [(T) +( ) ] × 2400 = 11.29 × 106
40 T 40
cycles
o The number of basis working cycles: NFO=4.106
o NFE1>NFO1, NFE2>NFO2 therefore KFL1=1, KFL2=1
o From table 6.13 of [I], bending fatigue limit:
σ0F lim 1 = 1.8 × 200 = 360 MPa
σ0F lim 2 = 1.8 × 185 = 333MPa
sF=1.75
KFL1 .KFC1
o [σF1 ] = σ0Flim1 = 205.71 MPa
sF1
KFL2 .KFC2
o [σF2 ] = σ0Flim2 = 190.29 MPa
sF2
Calculate parameters:
31
o m = (0,01 ÷0,02)aw=0.85÷1.7
Choose m=1.25
2a
w
Total number of teeth: z1 = m(u+1) = 38
z2 = u × z1 = 99
z
u = z2 = 2.6
1
Pitch diameter
o d1 = z1 m = 47.5 mm
o d2 = z2 m = 123.75 mm
Addendum diameter:
o da1 = d1 + 2m = 50mm
o da2 = d2 + 2m = 123.25 mm
z1 +z2
Recalculate shaft distance: aw = m = 85.63 mm
2
Fa2 = 0
32
Check bending strength
YF Ft KF Yc Yβ 725,4. 3561,37. 1,06575
o σF = =
bμ m n 2. 45
33
CHAPTER 7: DESIGNING CHAIN DRIVE
7.2. CALCULATION:
With u=2choose the number of small sprocket: z1 = 29 − 2u = 25 so choose z1 = 25
(teeth).
Choose the number of teeth on driven sprocket:
z2 = z1 × u = 50
*Efficiency of using condition of K:
K: K= Kr.Ka.K0.Kdc.Kb.Klv
Kr = 1,2: dynamic action of the load.
Ka = 1: efficiency of center distance.
K0 = 1: efficiency of position of the drive.
Kdc =1: efficiency of possibility of adjusting the center distance of the drive.
Kb =0,8: efficiency of lubrication.
Klv = 1,12: efficiency of operating conditions of the drive.
SoK=1,2 .1.1.1.0,8.1,12 = 1,0752.
Efficiency of rotation of drive shaft:
200
o K n = 138.66 = 1,43
34
Base on table 5.4 in reference, choose:
o pc = 25,4 d0 = 7,95 b0 = 22,61
Average speed:
n.pc .Z1 140.31×25.4×25
o v= = = 1,48(m/s)
60000 60000
Effective pull:
1000p 1000×0.404
o Ft = = = 272.97(N)
v 1,48
3 p.K
Check again Pc: pc ≥ 600. √z = 11.1 => Satisfied
1 .n.30.Kx
2 50−25 2
0,25.25,4 {118 − 0,5(25 + 50) + √(124 − 0,5(25 − 50)) − 2 ( ) }=
π
1017.33 mm
o In order to avoid too much load, we decrease amount of a=0,003.a≈ 3,052(mm)
o So center distance is: a= 1014.28 (mm)
Chain length:
o L = pc . X = 25,4.118 = 2997.2(mm)
Total impact of chain in 1s:
z1 .nz 25×140.31
o i= = ≈ 1.98 < [i] = 15
15.X 15×118
35
9,81×kf qa
Initial tension:F0 = = 103.48(N)
1000
π
o da1 = p [0.5 + cotg (z )] = 326,44 + 0,7.25,4 = 213,76 (mm)
1
pc
o d2 = = 404.51 (mm)
sin(π⁄z2 )
π
o da2 = p [0.5 + cotg (z )] = 416.42 (mm)
2
P=0.404(kW)
u= 2
pc = 25,4
z1 = 25 tooth, z2 = 50 tooth
a = 1014.28
L = 2997.2(mm)
d1 = 202.66(mm)
da1 = 213,76 (mm)
d2 = 404.51(mm)
da2 = 416.42(mm)
36
CHAPTER 8: SHAFTS, BEARINGS, KEYS
3 T
d= √ = 13.07 mm
0.2[τ]
→ Choose d=15 mm
With T=11168.82 Nmm; [τ]=20÷25 MPa, choose [τ]=25 MPa
From table 10.3 of [1]:
o e=50 mm
o u=50 mm
o x = 15 mm
o f≥50 mm
o w=40 mm
b2=39 mm (width of driving spur gear), (1÷1,5)d=15÷22.5
→ choose hub length l2=40 mm
b3=27.5 mm (width of driven spur gear), (1÷1,5)d=15÷22.5
→ choose hub length l3=28 mm
Distance between bearings: l=l2+l3+3x+w=153 mm
From figure 10.17 we have:
o d0=15 mm
37
Picture 8.1: Shaft II
Oyz:
Picture 8.2: Shaft II inertial force and moment diagram on Oyz plane
Oxz:
38
Picture 8.3: Shaft II inertial force and moment diagram on Oxz plane
Torsion: T=11168.82 N.mm
Dangerous section: section used to attach spur gear
3 M
d≥ √ = 7.14 mm < 15mm
0,1[σ]
Shaft evaluation:
39
Bending:
π d3 b t (d−t)2
o W= − = 248.23 mm3
32 2d
Torsion:
π d3 b t (d−t)2
o W0 = − = 579.57 mm3
16 2d
o T = 11168.82 Nmm
τmax T
o τa = τm = = W = 19.27 MPa (shaft rotates in one direction)
2 0
o Torsion:
τ−1 = 0,25 × σb = 159,5
σ−1
Sτ = Kσσa = 9,81
+ ψσ σm
εσ β
o Safety factor:
Sσ Sτ
S= = 2,88 > [s] = 1,5→Satisfied
√Sσ 2 + Sτ 2
40
8.2. CALCULATION OF SHAFT I:
3 T
d= √ = 8.72 mm
0.2[τ]
→ Choose d=10mm
With T=3325.07 Nmm; [τ]=20÷25 MPa, choose [τ]=25 MPa
From table 10.3 of [1]:
o e=60 mm
o u=50 mm
o f≥ 50 mm
o w=40 mm
b=32,5 mm (width of driving spur gear), (1÷1,5)d=33÷49,5
→ choose hub length l2=35 mm
Distance between bearings: l= 85mm choose l=203 mm
From figure 10.17 we have:
o d0=10 mm
Choosing elastic shaft connector:
o From table 16.10a of [3]:
d=33 mm
D=67 mm
L=51mm
D0=45 mm
Z=3 mm
2T
Ft = D = 49.26 N
0z
Fr = 0,2Ft = 9.85 N
41
Picture 8.4: Shaft I
Oyz:
Picture 8.5: Shaft I inertial force and moment diagram on Oyz plane
Oxz:
42
Picture 8.6: Shaft I inertial force and moment diagram on Oxz plane
Torsion: T=3325.07N.mm
Dangerous section: section used to attach helical gear
3 M
d≥ √ = 5.14 mm < 10 mm
0,1[σ]
Shaft evaluation:
43
π d3 b t (d−t)2
o W= − = 75.98 mm3
32 2d
Torsion:
π d3 b t (d−t)2
o W0 = − = 174.15mm3
16 2d
o T = 3325.07Nmm
τmax T 3325.07
o τa = τm = = = = 19.09 MPa (shaft rotates in one direction)
2 W0 174.15
o Torsion:
τ−1 = 0,25 × σb = 159,5
σ−1
Sτ = Kσσa = 15,47
+ ψσ σm
εσ β
o Safety factor:
Sσ Sτ
S= = 2,76 > [s] = 1,5→Satisfied
√Sσ 2 + Sτ 2
44
8.3. CALCULATION OF SHAFT III:
3 T
d= √ = 17.65 mm
0.2[τ]
→ Choose d=20 mm
With T=27497.68 Nmm; [τ] =20÷25 MPa, choose [τ] =25 MPa
From table 10.3 of [1]:
o e=70 mm
o u=60 mm
o f≥65 mm
o w=40 mm
b=34 mm (width of driven spur gear), (1÷1,5)d=34÷51
→ choose hub length l2=34 mm
Distance between bearings: l= 88 mm choose l=138mm
From figure 10.17 we have:
o d0=20 mm
45
Picture 8.8: Shaft III inertial force and moment diagram on Oyz plane
Oxz:
Picture 8.9: Shaft III inertial force and moment diagram on Oxz plane
Torsion: T=27497.68 Nmm
Dangerous section: section used to attach spur gear
46
3 M
d≥ √ = 8.29 mm < 20mm
0,1[σ]
Shaft evaluation:
Torsion:
π d3 b t (d−t)2
o W0 = − = 1393.43 mm3
16 2d
o T = 27519.61Nmm
τmax T
o τa = τm = = W = 19.75 MPa (shaft rotates in one direction)
2 0
47
σ−1
Sσ = Kσσa = 5,25
+ ψσ σm
εσ β
o Torsion:
τ−1 = 0,25 × σb = 159,5
σ−1
Sτ = Kσσa = 12,1
+ ψσ σm
εσ β
o Safety factor:
Sσ Sτ
S= = 4,81 > [s] = 1,5→Satisfied
√Sσ 2 + Sτ 2
48
CHAPTER 9: DESIGNING PAIRS OF ROLLER BEARINGS FOR GEARBOX
Choose: e = 0.3
FsA = e. FrA = 50.157 N
12 37 12 1 8.5 4.15
49
Because QA>QB so we calculate for bearing A
Conventional load:
3 ∑(Q3i Li ) 3 3 3 20 20
QAE = √ = √QA [1 ( ) + 0,73 ( )] = 146.41 N
∑ Li 40 40
Choose: e = 0.3
FsA = e. FrA = 97.89 N
50
d(mm) D(mm) B(mm) r(mm) C(kN) C0 (kN)
Conventional load:
3 ∑(Q3i Li ) 3 3 3 20 20
QBE = √ = √QB [1 ( ) + 0,73 ( )] = 336.52N
∑ Li 40 40
51
Choose: e = 0.3
FsA = e. FrA = 79.749 N
3 ∑(Q3i Li ) 3 3 3 20 20
QBE = √ = √QB [1 ( ) + 0,73 ( )] = 402.97 N
∑ Li 40 40
52
CHAPTER 10: THE DESIGN OF GEARBOX SHELL
Table 10.1: Gearbox shell calculation
Choose δ1 = 7 mm
*Tendon stiffness:
*Diameter:
*Dimension of bearing pillars: External Determined by the size of the cover of the table 18.2 we have:
diameter and screw hole center, D3 , D2 Shaft I: D= 37 (mm), D2=51 mm, D3=72 mm, h=8 mm, Z=4, d4=6
53
Coupling flange: K 2 mm
Center of bolt hole: E2 Shaft II: D=35 (mm), D2=49 mm, D3=70 mm, h=8 mm, Z=4, d4=6
mm
k is the distance from the center of the bolt to
the edge of the hole Shaft III: D=52 (mm), D2=65 mm, D3=80 mm, h=8 mm, Z=4,
d4=6 mm
Height h
K 2 = E2 + R 2 + (3 ÷ 5) mm => Select K 2 = 48 (mm)
k ≥ 1.2.d2 = 18⇒ k = 18
q = K1 + 2 δ = 76 (mm)
54
D3 ≈ D + 4,4d4
D2 = D + (1,6 ÷ 2)d4
Table 10.2:
Shaft D D2 D3
I 37 mm 51 mm 72 mm
II 35 mm 49 mm 70 mm
III 52 mm 65 mm 80 mm
d c l
6 1 45
- Made of GX14-32.
55
Table 10.4: The composition of bearing cover screw in the gearbox
Shaft D D2 D3 D4 h d4 z
I 37 mm 51 mm 72 mm 42 mm 8 mm 6 mm 4
II 35 mm 49 mm 70 mm 65 mm 8 mm 6 mm 4
III 52 mm 65 mm 80 mm 75 mm 8 mm 6 mm 4
A B A1 B1 C C1 K R screw numbers
A B C D E G H I K L M N O P Q R S
M27x2 15 30 15 45 36 32 6 4 10 8 22 6 32 18 36 32
56
10.1.5. Oil drain plug:
-After a period of time working, lubricating oil inside the box gets dirty (due to dust and abrasive
grain) or degenerated, so we need to replace it. To remove the dirty oil, at the bottom of the
gearbox is the oil drain. While working, the drain is sealed by the oil drain plug.
Table 9.7: The structure and size of the oil drain plug is chosen according to 18-7 [1]
d b M f L c q D S D0
- Thickness: S = (2 ÷ 3). δ = 16 mm
10.1.8. Separating screw for the lid and the body of the gearbox:
- In order to separate the lid and the body of the gearbox, we use M14x30 screw.
57
-Bearing cover washers are widely used because of their simple structure and ease of
replacement. However, there are disadvantages in form of abrasion and friction when the surface
of the shaft has high roughness.
The outer of bearings does not rotate so it has local load, we assembly due to the hole system.
For the bearings to move along the shaft axis when the temperature rises during the work, we
choose the type of intermediate is H7/k6.
58
REFERENCES:
[1] Nguyễn Hữu Lộc, Phạm Anh Tú, 2016, Giáo trình cơ sở thiết kế máy, Nhà xuất bản
ĐHQG-HCM, Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
[2] Trịnh Chất – Lê Văn Uyển, Nguyễn Văn Mậu, 2006, Tính toán thiết kế hệ dẫn động cơ
khí, hai tập, Nhà xuất bản giáo dục Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
[3] Nguyễn Hồng Ngân (chủ biên) – Nguyễn Danh Sơn, Phạm Anh Tú, 2014, Kỹ thuật nâng
chuyển (Tập 2) –Máy vận chuyển lien tục, Nhà xuất bản ĐHQG-HCM, Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
[4] Lê Khánh Điền, 2016, Vẽ kĩ thuật cơ khí, Nhà xuất bản ĐHQG-HCM, Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
[5] Dongil Rubber Belt Co., Ltd, Design Manual for Power Transmission Belts
[6] Somjet Thanomputra, Thanya Kiatiwat (2016): Simulation study of cutting sugarcane using
fine sand abrasive waterjet
[7] Jiří Dvořák and Tomáš Kuvik et al.(2017): Impact of the selected factors on the cutting
force when using a chainsaw
[8] Patil, M., & Patil, P. D. (2013). Optimization of blade angle for cutting system of sugar
cane harvester., International indexed and referred research journal 42(4), 49-52.HAINSAW
[9] Esquivel, M., Marrero, S., Ponce, E., Guerrero, A., Stainlay, T., Villaruz, J., & Bella, L. D.
(2008). Evaluation of the automatic base-cutter control system in the Australian sugarcane
industry. Proc. 2008 Conf. Australian Soc. Sugar Cane Tech. (pp. 322-327). Townsville,
Australia: Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists
[10] S.Ma, M.Karkee, P.A.Scharf, (18 January 2015): Sugarcane harvester technology: A
critical overview, Q.Zhang, Research gate Vol.30(5): 729-739.
[11] Otto, A., Parmigiani, J. (2015): Velocity, Depth-of-cut, and Physical Property Effects on
Saw Chain Cutting, “Saw chain cutting”, BioResources 10(4), 7273-7291
[13] ContiTech Holding GmbH, Hannover, 2002, CONTI-V MULTIRIB® multiple V-ribbed
belts
59