Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Nadia B. Farashahi
Abstract
This paper looks at the occurrence of workplace sexual harassment that has
created a setback for a functioning work environment. The author begins by introducing what
sexual harassment in the workplace is as well as the different types. Information on how a victim
can take steps to make a claim and what consequences the perpetrator can receive are discussed.
The author then addresses the legalities that surround workplace sexual harassment on the
federal and states levels, including court cases. Connections are made to sexual harassment
occurring on a global scale to see the impact of this issue with more perception. Finally, the
author talks about recent trends in workplace sexual harassment and possible solutions to take for
prevention.
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 3
One in five American adults have reported being a victim to sexual harassment in the
workplace (Lee, 2017). This means that one in five American adults, the majority being women,
have experienced sexual comments, obscene gestures, and inappropriate touching in their place
of employment. This type of action can take a toll on the work environment, the employees
involved, and the image that the company portrays. The occurrence of sexual harassment in the
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) established two main types of
sexual harassment in the workplace, which also establishes the the two types of sexual
harassment claims: quid pro quo and hostile work environment. Both types of harassment
involve unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, but there are different factors that go into
Quid pro quo sexual harassment occurs when someone with power, such as a supervisor,
makes a condition that if a worker under them wants to keep their job/job benefits, they have to
comply to sexual harassment ("Sexual Harassment," n.d.). Through quid pro quo, actions like
promotions, hiring, or firing are dependent on the employee involved giving sexual favors or
taking part in sexual conduct by the will of the employer. An example is a higher up demanding
sexual favors and either threatening an employee with termination for not taking part in it or
promising a promotion for agreeing (Berlin, 2018). If a person wants to claim sexual harassment
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 4
under quid pro quo, there are certain elements they must be able to prove to a jury. These
elements are:
1. Plaintiff was an employee of, or applied for a job with, company X (the defendant).
sexual nature.
decisions affecting the plaintiff were made based on his or her acceptance or rejection of
4. At the time of the alleged conduct, the alleged harasser was a supervisor or agent for
company X.
6. The alleged harasser's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's harm
This process is just for compensation for a quid pro quo harassment claim. So, if an employee
wants full justice they will need to take the complaint to a federal labor protection agency like
the EEOC. If a quid pro quo case is filed as a lawsuit, even if it is proven that no employment
opportunity was taken away as well as the salary/benefits, the plaintiff could still get
compensation. In addition, the employer could still be held liable (Wilner, Mckenna, Burritt, &
To qualify for a hostile work environment sexual harassment claim, there usually has to
be a reoccurring action and has to show a pattern. If it occurs once, it is usually not classified as a
hostile work environment. This type of sexual harassment means there is some sort of action
taking place that is not wanted, based on sex, and has the magnitude to make a work
environment that is abusive. It occurs if an employee is subject by another employer, who can
also be an employer, to unwelcome sexual conduct. This can include advances, gestures,
demands, or comments of a sexual nature. No employment benefit has to be at risk for a hostile
work environment claim. Hostile work environment sexual harassment can affect the work
environment for the other employees even though they were not directly involved in the
harassment. If sexual harassment occurs between employees, the employer can be liable for
hostile work environment harassment as long as certain things are proven. The employer had to
have had knowledge about the situation and it be proven that he/she did not take any action to
There are certain standards that have to be met in order for someone to claim they are a
victim to sexual harassment in the workplace. The term is defined by the law as, “unwelcome
verbal, visual, non-verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature or based on someone’s sex that
is severe or pervasive and affects working conditions or creates a hostile work environment”
(Equal Rights Advocate, n.d.). Workplace sexual harassment can be the cause of a antagonistic
or offensive environment at work. Victims who claim sexual harassment have to meet a
subjective and objective standard- “he/she subjectively believed the conduct was hostile,
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 6
abusive, or offensive; and a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would objectively
believe the conduct was hostile, abusive, or offensive” (Sexual harassment at work, 2018).
Sexual harassment in the workplace can take the form of making inappropriate sexual comments,
sharing sexual images online or in person, making unwanted physical contact with another
employee, etc (Doyle, 2018). If a person has or believes they have been subject to sexual
harassment in the workplace, there are different ways for them to take action. Certain companies
might already have a process in place that deals with sexual harassment complaints, so an
employee can first take their situation through their superiors. This can include having an
employer delegated to be the person who receives and handles any complaints or allegations.
("Sexual Harassment," n.d.). If the situation can not be fully handled within the company, the
victim can try to file the complaint through their state. If the state does not have a law to address
it, then the person should take it federally which has a 300 day range of when a complaint can be
reported. If an employee has any sort of concerns or inquiries about sexual harassment in the
workplace they can reach out to the Office of Civil Rights, under the U.S. Department of State,
who can take action though investigating any allegations. Persons wanting to make a claim for
sexual harassment in the workplace, for either type of sexual harassment claim, can also file a
complaint with the Department of State through the EEOC (U.S. Department of State, n.d.). This
agency enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. They take action through an
investigation once this occurs the victim can formally file a Title VII lawsuit, also assuming
there is no settlement that would occur ("Sexual Harassment," n.d.). Through the EEOC, making
a complaint requires a process involving contacting an agency counselor within 45 days of the
act that took place. This contact will allow the claim victim to be informed of what actions
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 7
he/she can to take in order to legally deal with the issue. There are lots of different options to be
taken once a claim victim gets to this point including taking the case to court, mitigating
damages, and that in order for a complaint to be official filed with the agency, it must have been
Employees can be liable for compensatory and punitive damages if quid pro or hostile
work environment harassment is proven. Liability can depend on the position of person who
committed the act and how the company acted to fix it. If committed by a superior and there is
solid employment action like demoting or firing, the employer is liable. If committed by a
superior and the harassment is a hostile work environment, employer is liable. “The employer's
defense to liability is that it 1) exercised reasonable care to prevent the harassment and took
prompt corrective action to stop it once made aware, and 2) the employee unreasonably refused
coworker, the employer is liable if they knew/should have known about the harassment;
however, they aren’t liable if its shown that they immediately did something to address the
If a complaint or claim is made through the Department of State and this incident is
proven to have occurred, the harasser will receive some sort of management action. “Discipline
will be appropriate to the circumstances, ranging from a letter of reprimand through suspensions
without pay of varying lengths to separation for cause. A verbal or written admonishment, while
not considered formal discipline, may also be considered” (U.S. Department of State, n.d.)
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 8
Legalities
There are different levels of laws and codes that govern sexual harassment in the
workplace. This includes local policies, state codes, federal laws, and case laws. These laws are
set in place to stop the occurrence of sexual harassment and try to deter it.
Federal laws. Sexual harassment in the workplace is considered a violation of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Under this federal law, sex, race, color, national origin, and
religion can not be used as the base for discrimination in employment. “The law also makes it
illegal to retaliate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a
State laws. In Virginia Code § 30-129.4, sexual harassment training is required for all
employees of the legislative branch for Virginia. This required training applies specifically to a
legislative staff compensated by the state who work full time, and all other full-time employees
of each legislative branch agency of the Commonwealth. The Code of Virginia defines sexual
harassment as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors… when such conduct
environment” (Sexual Harassment, 2018). Different states have various sexual harassment laws
and policies. Certain states have fair employment laws which deal with the issue, requiring that
the complaint be filed 180 days after the incident occurred.Companies with less than 15 workers
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 9
are governed by state laws while those with 15 or more follow Title VI’s standards ("Sexual
Harassment," n.d.).
Court Cases
When sexual harassment cases have gone to court, they have helped to set precedent and
establish case laws for the issue. Workplace sexual harassment cases have been occurring for
many years. One significant case took place during the 1980’s known as Harris v. Forklift
Systems, Inc. Tessa Harris worked as a rental manager for Forklift Systems Inc, and she claimed
from 1985 to 1987 that her employer, Charles Hardy, created a abusive and hostile work
environment with offensive/vulgar comments and actions of sexual nature. She claimed he
called her a “dumb ass woman” and even made suggestions of going to a nearby hotel to
negotiate her raise. Harris quit then filed the suit on the grounds of being a victim of sexual
harassment under Title VII. The federal district court ruled in favor of of Forklift Systems
because a hostile work environment was not created by Hardy’s actions, and the harassment was
not to the magnitude that it could affect Harris’s psychological well being. The decision was
affirmed by a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. The case was then taken to the Supreme Court.
The question raised by this case was “Must sexual harassment ‘seriously affect [an employee's]
psychological well being’ in order to create an ‘abusive work environment’ that violates Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?” (Oyez, n.d.). In an unanimous decision in 1993, the
Supreme Court ruled favor of the petitioner, saying plaintiffs in Title VII workplace-harassment
don’t have to prove psychological injury. However, the court acknowledged that an offensive
2015). This case set a precedent involving whether psychological injury has to be proven in order
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 10
for it to be a workplace sexual harassment lawsuit. It also helped to analyze the legalities behind
sexual harassment in the workplace and helped make the public more aware of this issue,
especially during those years. A more recent example of sexual harassment case is Ashley Alford
vs. Aaron’s Rents. In 2008, Ashley Alford filed a lawsuit with the EEOC under Title VII against
Aaron Rents, Inc. and her supervisor through the company, Richard Moore through quid pro quo
sexual harassment. Alford brought to court claims that Moore had made inappropriate comments
of a sexual nature, exposed himself to her, and requested for sexual favors from her. She said that
these favors Moore sought were in return for her employment and benefits like longer lunch
hours and more vacation days. Eventually, Alford said that she was sexual assaulted by him in
the store’s warehouse. When she started working, Alford was informed of policies against sex
discrimination and harassment as well as a hotline to call if there were any complaints of this
regard. After she started working for the company, Moore started to touch her and talk to her in
unwelcome, inappropriate, ways of a sexual nature. Alford called the hotline to complain of his
behavior and talked to another manager of the store, but nothing came out of these actions.
Moore sexually assaulted her in the security room in which he locked them in, and after this she
called the hotline once again. On top of this she also talked to another manager about what was
occurring but no immediate action was taken. Alford filed a claim with the EEOC, and they
investigated the situation, ending with Moore being suspended immediately. .(Ashley Alford v.
Workplace sexual harassment is a global issue; it is not confined to the boundaries of the
United States. It occurs everywhere, and in some countries, like India, it is a even bigger threat
especially to females.
Overview of Occurrence
India is still currently a developing country, with higher poverty rates, less policies
targeting gender inequality, and a big labor force. In regards to sexual harassment in the
workplace, women workers are more vulnerable to be victims. This is because of job insecurity,
economic dependence on the job for their livelihood, social perception of obeying the superiors,
or male bias in work environment. Women fear retribution if they report conduct like sexual
harassment, and it can also be difficult to come up with enough evidence for a charge. On top of
all this is the embarrassment and attention that comes with making a claim (Padmini, 2017). This
takes place all over world, in different cultures, including the United States. In India, their
culture is different from other nations in the way that for a long time it has been a patriarchal
society and women have been seen as inferior to males. This system puts women in more
vulnerable positions already in society, especially in the workplace which alters men mindsets to
act on their “dominance” and the powerless position of the woman. This is not always the case in
other nations, but in India it is how society has functioned for a long time, the males are always
on top; although this is changing in recent years because of economic and social advances among
the genders. However, it is still a big problem (Padmini, 2017). The occurrence of sexual
harassment is not confined to one country; it is on a global scale. Women for years have been the
main target of sexual harassment in the United States and other countries, especially those where
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 12
there are greater rates of gender inequality in society. 79% of women in India have experience
Sexual harassment in the workplace is an illegal act defined by the Supreme Court of
India, in a similar wording as the United States, as any sort of unwelcome action of a sexual
nature, “whether directly or by implication such as physical conduct and advances, a demand or
request for sexual favors, sexually colored remarks, showing pornography, [and] any unwelcome
physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature” (Padmini, 2017). The Indian law is
similar to the components of the United States law, with an emphasis on the act being
unwelcome. This law was enacted after a gang rape of a social worker in India in the late 1990’s.
It was this event that the Indian Supreme Court took notice on the lack of legalities on sexual
Workplace sexual harassment occurs at such a large scale, that it will never be
completely ended. It can have great effects on the victims, who are usually women. However, in
recent times more and more awareness has been growing in retaliation against workplace sexual
harassment. On top of that, more and more steps are being taken within workplaces to counter it.
The best method is to spread awareness and try to address every aspect of it through policies and
regulations.
A majority of women in the United States who have been sexually harassed have
experienced some sort of mental and/or physical problems due to this harassment. These victims
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 13
are also susceptible to lose wages and hours in unpaid leave. These occurrences have a
significant impact on the work environment and the employees, especially if the perpetrator was
a male and the victim a female. “Sexual harassment has a cumulative, demoralizing effect that
discourages women from asserting themselves within the workplace, while among men it
There is a demoralizing effect that accompanies sexual harassment that takes a toll on all
employees, even if they are not directly involved. This altered work environment could cause
employees, especially women to try to find a new place of work, leaving the company or
#MeToo movement. In recent years there has been a bigger stand taken on sexual
harassment in the workplace, seen through a specific movement known as #MeToo. This was
initiated when The New York Times published an expose alleging that Harvey Weinstein
committed sexual harassment, causing others to come out with claims against other
executives/superiors. As a result of the movement, New York state and New York City created
new stricter workplace sexual harassment laws which begin October 16, 2018. The new laws
require all New York state employees to take part in training for sexual harassment by October 9,
2019, and new employees have to take part in it as soon as possible or within 90 days. There are
other states that have required harassment training, like California, yet New York is different
because of its rigor. The training is going to be annually, focusing on prevention, and will be a
requirement of every employee. It will also focus on discrimination. Among its provisions, there
is no requirement for the state to check if every business is taking part in the provisions of it, but
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 14
there are the possibility of consequences if they don’t. A human resources consultant, Frank
Cania, talks on the new development saying “the training has to somehow accommodate
questions, including [a] live trainer made available during that training session to answer those
questions. And it also requires the employer to solicit feedback from employees about the
training and the materials presented.” There has been a change in workplace harassment cases,
showing a great business risk for employers now that more employees are coming out with
allegations (Noguchi & McKeon, 2018). There has also been an increase in the amount of sexual
harassment workplace claims filed with the EEOC in correlation with the momentum of the
#MeToo movement. There was a 12% increase in sexual harassment claims filed with EEOC.
There was also 50% increase in lawsuits for allegations of sexual harassment, they filed
41.However, there is skepticism to the vast amount of complaints being filed to the EEOC, and
they believe they do not truly represent the actual amount of sexual harassment taking place in
the work environment.As many as 70% of people who are harassed never file a complaint with
Required training. As seen with the policy implemented for required training for
New York state employees after the Harvey Weinstein controversy, required training is a strong
solution to target sexual harassment in the workplace. A bill introduced to the Senate in
pending approval. It is a resolution “requiring sexual harassment training for Members, officers,
employees, interns, and fellows of the Senate and a periodic survey of the Senate” (Senate
Training, 2017). This process that would take place in the Senate not only requires training for
preventing sexual harassment, but surveys would also be given periodically that will constantly
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 15
reinstate zero tolerance for and aim at detering it (Senate Training, 2017). A similar bill was
actually passed in the House of Representatives that requires all employees and members of the
House to take part in anti-discrimination and anti-harassment training. It would occur during
each one-year session of each two-year Congress ("Should Members," n.d.). Direct initiatives
like these, involving the government of the United States addressing the problem in their own
There are laws that govern sexual harassment in the workplace, and these will
always be in place. However, a more effective way to prevent and spread awareness on this issue
is to target it on a smaller scale. Certain companies and businesses already have sexual
harassment policies or some sort of training in place, however they can be made more important
and effective. Many steps can be taken in to take these preventive steps like making sure there is
a clear policy on sexual harassment that is known to all employees. This policy should define
sexual harassment, address the zero tolerance on it, list any consequences, promise protection for
anyone who wants to make a complaint, etc. On top of this, there should be some sort of training
that all employees, even supervisors take part it. The US government is already taking steps in
their own place of work to combat sexual harassment, which shows the importance of it being
incorporated throughout the country. There are already some states that have requirements for
training like Connecticut and Maine, and recently New York has done the same (Barreiro, n.d.).
Conclusion
As long as sexual harassment is occurring, there can not be a fully functioning or safe
work environment. Even with the protections that have been implemented including federal laws
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 16
like Title VII, the problem still occurs. Taking legal action against workplace sexual harassment
is not an easy process either, with lots of processes and standards that have to be met. A victim
no longer feels welcoming or relaxed in their place of work, and the work environment as a
whole is completely disrupted. There have been court cases from decades ago to ones that have
taken place in recent years, which is just evidence of the continuance problem. However, today,
there has been bigger steps to raise awareness and address workplace sexual harassment. There is
no set solution to completely end it, but tight enforcement and more preparation for prevention
References
American Association of University Women. (2018). Know your rights at work. Retrieved
https://www.aauw.org/what-we-do/legal-resources/know-your-rights-at-work/workplace-
sexual-harassment/
Ashley Alford v. Aaron Rents, No. 08-cv-0683-MJR (May 3, 2011). Retrieved from
https://casetext.com/case/alford-v-aaron-rents-7
Barreiro, S. (n.d.). Preventing sexual harassment in the workplace. Retrieved December 14,
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/preventing-sexual-harassment-workplace-2985
1.html
Berlin, R. (2018). Sexual harassment in the workplace defined. Retrieved November 26, 2018,
Doyle, A. (2018, November 6). Examples of sexual and non-sexual harassment. Retrieved
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/examples-of-sexual-and-non-sexual-harassment-206
0884
EEOC. (n.d.). Federal EEO complaint processing procedures. Retrieved November 26, 2018,
https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/publications/fedprocess.cfm
EEO: sexual harassment: what are the different types of sexual harassment? (2018, January 12).
Retrieved November 26, 2018, from Society for Human Resource Management website:
https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/hr-qa/pages/typesofsexualhar
assment.aspx
Encyclopedia Britannica. (2015, September 23). Harris v. forklift systems. Retrieved October 9,
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Harris-v-Forklift-Systems
Equal Rights Advocate. (n.d.). Sexual harassment at work [Fact sheet]. Retrieved November 20,
https://www.equalrights.org/legal-help/know-your-rights/sexual-harassment-at-work/
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1993/92-1168
Harris v. Forklift Systems. (23 Sep, 2014). Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 9, 2019,
from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Harris-v-Forklift-Systems
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 18
Horowitz, J. (2018, Oct 5). Workplace sexual harassment claims have spiked in #MeToo Era.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/04/business/eeoc-sexual-harassment
-reports/index.html
Miller, B. (2018, September 3). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Quid pro quo versus hostile
work environment. Retrieved November 28, 2018, from HR Daily Advisor website:
https://hrdailyadvisor.blr.com/2014/09/03/sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-quid-pro-
quo-versus-hostile-work-environment/
Noguchi, Y., & McKeon, S. (2018, Oct 9). Amid #MeToo, New York employers face strict new
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/09/654537942/amid-metoo-new-york-employers-face-strict
-new-sexual-harassment-laws
Oyez. (n.d.). Harris v. forklift systems, inc. Retrieved October 9, 2018, from Oyez.org website:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1993/92-1168
Padmini, K. (2017). Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace. Indian Social Science
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2002968973?accountid=3785
Requiring Each Member, Officer, and Employee of the House of Representatives to Complete a
Congress, and for Other Purposes, H.R. 630, 115th Cong. (Nov. 29, 2017). Retrieved
from
https://www.countable.us/bills/hres630-115-requiring-each-member-officer-and-employe
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 19
e-of-the-house-of-representatives-to-complete-a-program-of-training-in-workplace-rights
-and-responsibilitie
Senate training on prevention of sexual harassment resolution, S. Res. 323, 115th Cong. (as
https://www.countable.us/bills/sres323-115-senate-training-on-prevention-of-sexual-hara
ssment-resolution
Senthilingam, M. (2017, November 29). Sexual harassment: How it stands around the globe
(S.-G. Mankarious, Ed.). Retrieved December 10, 2018, from CNN.com website:
https://www-m.cnn.com/2017/11/25/health/sexual-harassment-violence-abuse-global-lev
els/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
Sexual harassment: actions you can take. (n.d.). Retrieved from FindLaw website:
https://employment.findlaw.com/employment-discrimination/sexual-harassment-actions-
you-can-take.html
https://employment.findlaw.com/employment-discrimination/sexual-harassment-at-work.
html
Sexual harassment training required; legislative branch., Va. Code Ann. § 30-129.4 (2018).
Should members and employees of the house of representatives have to undergo anti-harassment
and anti-discrimination training? (n.d.). Retrieved December 12, 2018, from Countable.us
website:
https://www.countable.us/bills/hres630-115-requiring-each-member-officer-and-employe
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 20
e-of-the-house-of-representatives-to-complete-a-program-of-training-in-workplace-rights
-and-responsibilitie
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/svaw/harassment/explore/4effects.htm
U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). Sexual harassment policy. Retrieved November 20, 2018, from
https://www.state.gov/s/ocr/c14800.htm
What is quid pro quo harassment? (2018). Retrieved November 26, 2018, from FindLaw
website:
https://employment.findlaw.com/employment-discrimination/what-is-quid-pro-quo-haras
sment.html
Wilner, Mckenna, Burritt, & Tilles LLp. (n.d.). Quid pro quo sexual harassment definition.
https://www.wmlawyers.com/sexual-harassment/definitions/eeoc-harassment-definition/q
uid-pro-quo-harassment/
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT 21