‘ble ‘Comparison of Treatment and Disposal Methods of Oly Sludge verage ‘treatment method *PRleation ol avantages Disadvantages References evel recovery rate (8) oven exvaction eo. SiPolelficient and Forlarge scale extraction ow [2,50" save tine efficiency and high varabity 35] Ceanand efficient, Lanse spacefortheinsalation of, Centrifugation Field <50. doesnot require high the plant itis vey comand pose energy consumption environmental concern a ee go FHEAACOS' Environmental tony and toy effective resistance to biodegradation Suitable for cold Temperature, duration high nergy reeze/thaw laboratory 60 (50-01) regions consumption gh energy consumption, high rolysis Field 70 Easyand simple 2-7 can Yandsimple paincenance and operatingcost 271 Microwave rradaton -‘Fekd—«90._Fastandefficient‘Mhenergy consumption Nigh Py maintenance and operating cost lectrokinetic Laboratory 60. Fastandecient Co™lltted aplication and enlyin (45) smal sale ast, highly efficent Uirmenieraaton teary 70 MEE gy eel pollition Simple appeation Froth oaton Laboratory 60 andlow energy Low efficiency (90-07 te Incineration Field 90 Fastandefficient ‘ith costo equipment and [28-100] environmental pollution Only for oly sludge with Tow Stabiization/sldifeaton Laboratory 90 Fastand ecient iste content(or dry state)and 5, gy the end product need proper smanogement ondation Laboratory 90 Fastandefficient Bh cost of operston, cate «environmental pollution 12 Low cot operation Sow process egies vEFTAEE Land farming Feld 80. and supportlarge portion of land and ean pose a pele ees Large capacity, fast high costo operation and require (12117= Biopile/composting Field 80 treamentthantand_ {88 a treatment Tas reatment and oe operation and Bioslurry Field 90 requir small and ee a) ‘management of the end product