Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the aiyiexed Verified Petition Under Duress, and the
exhibits attached therein, the undersigned will move tliis Court at a term thereofto be held at 45
Monroe Place, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, on the<^7^day of A 2019 and time t^bf^
scheduled by the court:
For an Order ofJudgment pursuant to Ajlicle 78 ofthe Civil Practice Law aptkulss-
:0' 3or is^
1. Declaring pursuant to C.P.L.R. ij 3001 that respondents proceeded, is procwdir^
cn
about to proceed without or in excess ofjurisdiction (prohibition). -u
2. Annulling the Decision and Order ot the Kings County Supreme Court Judge I^ach ^
Dear on the ground that the body or officer failed to perform a duty enjoined upon him by Law
and Equity(mandamus to compel)to determine jurisdiction, and declaring his determination to
be without jurisdiction, arbitrary, capricious, an abuse ofdiscretion due to bribery. Obstruction
of Justice, fraud upon the court by officers ot the court and cover up of corruption.
3. Declaring pursuant to C.P.L.R. 3001 that a determination was made in violation of
lawful procedure, was effected by an error in law, contrary to established law and procedure, or
was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion, including an abuse of discretion as to the
4)Declaring pursuant to C.P.L.R. § 3001 that determination was not made as a result ofa
hearing held, and at which evidence was taken, pursuant to direction by law is, on the entire
5)Declaring pursuant to C.P.L.R. § 3001 that decision and order is void due to unclean
hands ofrespondents; are coram nonjudice, and therefore has no force and effect.
6)Issue Preliminary Injunction or TRO per Article 63 while this article 78 petition
litigated.
^iT f
6) And for such other and further relie(^to this Court may seem just and proper
including referral to District Attorney for prosecution of attorneys' perjury and criminal
harassment of Petitioner,
TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that in case you failed to appear, the judgment by default
Michael Krichevsky, sui juris, self-governed alive man under protest and duress, and
2. I make this petition under duress due to my ongoing health problems while I am under
3. Some facts in this petition stated upon information and belief derived from conversations
with Respondent's Us Bank, NA and Wells Fargo Bank, NA employees and documents
maintained in my file.
4. Other facts stated in this petition are within my first-hand knowledge, and if called on as
5 Etched in stone above the doors to the Supreme Courthouse at 60 Centre Street in
Manhattan, the words of George Washington, delivered in 1789, endure to proclaim that, "The
true administration ofjustice is the firmest pillar of good government." Since then, the "true
administration ofjustice," with regard to law and equity has depended on honest, competent and
6. Underlying action is foreclosure matter that started in 2009, and if it would appear to the
reader to be bazaar, it is because in fact it is. However, under scrutiny it is not only bazaar, but
7. It started with "sewer service" by unscrupulous process server claiming in his affidavit of
service that 1 was personally served through my brother, John Krichevsky, who accepted
number. The facts are, at that address there is seven-story multiple dwelling building, I had no
brothers in my family and I did not reside at that building. The second, similar affidavits of
service stated that process server made several attempts to serve me at 4221 Atlantic Ave.,
Brooklyn, NY and finally summons and complaint were attached to the door and a copy was
mailed at that address. The facts were that process server was not there because at that time this
house was in ruins, there was no door and there was no mailbox at that time. I still have pictures
and documentary evidence to back it up. Needless to say, I was not aware ofthis action and
Plaintiff attempted to win this action by fraudulently defaulting me. Later on, I learned that
behind this action was notorious Steven J. Baum, P.C.- New York's King of foreclosure mills,
which was investigated by New York Attorney General and US Attorney for fraudulent
documentation, notes, mortgages and assignments used in foreclosures. As a result, this firm was
penalized and disbanded. Thereafter, administrative judge of Kings County Supreme Court
8. Several months later, another unscrupulous law firm attempted to restore this case to the
calendar. At least they did serve me with their motion to restore and I timely opposed it. I
demanded to see an original note that I allegedly signed. One oftheir attorneys appeared in open
court and produced the note for my examination. I "took the note apart" so to speak and pointed
to all its problems and inconsistencies as fabricated, fake, forged instrument created for the
purpose offoreclosure litigation. Attorneys of this firm attempted to railroad me with their false,
perjurious and unsigned affirmations with similar affidavits and exhibits. However, beloved Hon.
Bert Bunyan (old school judge) upheld law and order in my favor and permitted me to go on
trial. As a result. Plaintiffs attorney filed motion to voluntarily discontinue the action. On the
motion hearing date. Plaintiffs attorney requested that I allow the firm to save their face and not
oppose this motion with my demand for trial. As I was inexperienced in dealing with corrupt
attorneys, I did not cross move to dismiss this case "with prejudice."
0. That was my mistake in trusting attorneys, because in 2016 Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP
started "Round 3 foreclosure" with newly fabricated note, mortgage and assignment using the
10. This time,judge Noach Dear(Dear) was not going to uphold the law and order.
Circumstantial evidence suggests that he is on a take so to speak and illegally ruled in favor of
corruption. Otherwise, how Dear could lawfully reconcile the fact that the same alleged plaintiff
in possession oftwo obviously different "Original Notes," copies of which its attorneys filed in
did not err in this proceeding. In fact, he did exactly what he intended to do because after I
notified him of attorneys fi"om Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP misconduct and criminal behavior, he
refused to reprimand them thereby creating an inference of knowledge and intent of his personal
wrongdoing. His decision and order is deliberately false and misleading. Below, I will
demonstrate to the court that he listed no facts, which he used in his decision. As such, his legal
12. This Petition is my attempt to notify the judges ofthe Second Department, which
supposedly supervise judges and attorneys and removes them from the office for misconduct and
moral turpitude. In fact, I am reporting Treason to the judge(s) ofthis court, as well as violations
of Code of Judicial Conduct and New York Rules of Professional Conduct to New York
"When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and
irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease been
mistaking or cease being honest." Amicus Solo
13. What happened to me in Supreme Court is systemic public corruption. The following
events have happened to others before in Brooklyn Supreme Court. Form Wikipedia;
Gerald Carson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gerald Phillip "Gerry" Garson (born August 3, 1932) is a former New York Supreme Court
Justice who heard matrimonial divorce and child custody cases in Brooklyn.[5] He was
convicted in 2007 of accepting bribes to manipulate the outcomes of divorce
proceedings.[l][6][7] Garson was imprisoned from June 2007 until December 2009.[8] In the
bribery scheme, a "fixer" told people divorcing in Brooklyn that for a price he could steer their
case to a sympathetic judge.[9] After the fixer received a payment, he would refer the person to a
lawyer contact of his, who had given Garson drinks, meals, cigars, and cash—accepting(and
receiving) preferential treatment in return.[9][10] The fixer and the lawyer would then bribe
court employees to override the court's computer system, which was programmed to ensure that
cases were assigned to judges randomly. Instead, they would have the case assigned to
Garson.[9][11] Garson, in turn, would then privately coach the lawyer. He would tell him
questions the lawyer should ask of witnesses in the case before Garson, and arguments that the
lawyer should make to Garson in court.[12][13] Garson would then rule in favor ofthe
lawyer.[12][13] Garson was indicted in 2003, on the basis of video surveillance of his judicial
chambers, and recordings made on a body wire worn by his "favored" lawyer. At his four week
trial in 2007, he was acquitted on four counts, but found guilty on one count of accepting bribes,
and on two lesser charges of receiving rewards for official misconduct.[6] He was sentenced in
June 2007 to three to ten years in prison. In December 2009, after 30 months in prison, he was
released for good behavior at the age of 77.[14]
The New York TimeSy commenting on Carson's conviction, observed: "It was news that
confirmed every sneaking suspicion, every paranoid fantasy of anyone who had ever felt
wronged in a divorce court."[151
14. In addition to the scheme described above, the scheme that Respondents operated under
and against me described in detail in the book "The Importance ofBeing Honest" by Law
Professor Steven Lubet (available at AMAZON). In Chapter 31 on page 174 Professor relates,
"In California, Judge Gregory Caskey was publicly admonished for sending the following e-mail
to an attorney;
"1 am considering summarily rejecting [opposing counsel's] requests. Do you want me to let
[opposing counsel] have a hearing on this, or do we cut [opposing counsel] off summarily and
run the risk [of] the [Court of Appeals] reversing? ... I say screw [the other party] and let's cut
[opposing counsel] off without hearing. O.K.? By the way, this message will self-destruct in five
seconds."
"Your Honor, 1 don't feel comfortable responding ex-parte [sic] on how you should rule on a
pending case."
15. Similarly to this scam above. Dear summarily denied all my requests in my Omnibus
cross-motion without explanation, and particularly my motion for Travelers hearing, which is the
18. It is void due to the bribery and case fixing by Dear and respondents involved, which is
19. I make this petition under duress, in self-defense and in fear for my life as they try to
plunder my wealth and leave me homeless while I am trying to recover from my disability.
20. I contend that due to corruption and violation ofthe Federal and State RICO by all
21. Dear's cover up of corruption is in conflict with federal and state constitutional laws,
which explained by this eloquent ruling from United Stales v. Stewart, 234 F. Supp. 94(D.D.C.
1964);
''The officer may be sued only if he acts in excess of his statutory authority or in
violation of the Constitution for then he ceases to represent the Government."
22. Felonies and intentional torts by state court actors are acts in excess of their statutory
23. This court has inherent jurisdiction over respondents in the interest of Justice to do Right
24. This court has inherent jurisdiction over respondents as a body admitting attorneys to
practice law in Second Department and as body policing attorney's misconduct that they
committed against me. As such, this court should revoke all respondents' licenses and
admissions to practice law in this state - or this court is failing to protect the public and joins
wrongdoers itself.
25. My legal research points to this court's Fiduciary Duties to provide remedy to the injured,
and by doing so, ability to convert any pleadings into any other form of pleading smsponte in
the Interest ofJustice and under doctrine that substance trumps the form, see Haines v.Kerner,
404 U.S. 519( 1972 ), a judge should look to the substance not the form for Pro Se pleadings.
26. As taxpayer, I have a clear contractual and legal rights for protection by the state from
intentional torts and felonies committed by its agents. As such, state breached contractual and
Rebuttal of false presumptions of court's regular due process, presumed correctness of the
denials,judgments or orders with implied ^^hearing held, evidence taken" with implied
'Tindings of fact and conclusions of law"- all in violation of all five subsections of CPLR
7803
27. All Respondents overtly and in concert harassed me and denied me remedy.
28. There are no findings of fact and no conclusions of law, which is/are not intentionally
29. There is/are no findings offact and conclusions of law, 1 could have taken on appeal and
in good faith and with straight face say, "the court erred ..." as I know it would be a perjury on
Bribery and fraud upon the court by officers of the court entirely divests Supreme court of
jurisdiction
30. This court has inherent jurisdiction and duty to police lower court's misconduct and
felonies of Respondents and over the claims brought pursuant to C.P.L.R. Article 78 and,
specifically, exclusive jurisdiction per C.P.L.R. Article 7804(g)- Where the substantial evidence
issue specified.
31. This appeal by petition is filed in this court following C.P.L.R. §506(b)(1) that states:
"a proceeding against a justice ofthe Supreme Court or a judge of a county court...
shall be commenced in the appellate division of the judicial department where the
action, in the course of which the matter sought to be enforced or restrained originated,
is triable, unless the term of the appellate division in the department is not in session..."
[emphasis mine]
32. This court has jurisdiction over the claims for declaratory relief pursuant to C.P.L.R.
§3001. I ask this court declare right or wrong and do the right thing, thereby becoming
33. I ask this court declare that orders of Dear are coram nonjudice ab initio.
VENUE
34. This proceeding brought in the judiciary department where respondents' principal offices
PARTIES
prescribed painkilling medication and under doctor's care, therefore I notify the court that I
36. Judge Noach Dear is judge in foreclosure part 1, of Kings County Supreme Court. My
legal research of his persona led me to the New York Post's series of articles accusing him in
judicial corruption and case fixing, Exhibit A. He is officer who proceeded, is proceeding or is
about to proceed without or in excess ofjurisdiction against me and cause me irreparable harm.
37. Shmuel Taub, Esq. is Referee assigned by Dear, is officer who proceeded, is proceeding
harm.
38. Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP is foreclosure mill, is body, which proceeded, is proceeding
10
harm.
39. Brettanie L. Hart Saxton, Esq. is employee of Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, is officer who
40. Victoria E. Munian, Esq.(Munian) is employee of Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, is officer
41. David B. Wildermuth, Esq. is employee of Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, is officer who
42. Michael Thomas Jablonski, Esq.(Jablonski) is employee of Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP,
43. Wells Fargo Bank, NA is body, which proceeded, is proceeding or is about to proceed
45. This affidavit, if unrebutted point for point by each respondent will stand as judgment
and admission of material facts. "Assertions by affidavit ... sufficient to make the prima facie
46. This litigation started after Respondent Munian on 04/18/2016 electronically filed
11
Trustee and Trust are two different entities: the real party is the Trust — but only if it is
an entity that exists and holds my alleged note
47. In her certificate of merit in ^ 5 Munian wrote,"Upon this review and consultation, to the
best of my knowledge, information, and belief, 1 certify that there is a reasonable basis for the
commencement of this action, and that plaintiff is the creditor entitled to enforce rights under
48. This statement was false because it contradicted the Plaintiffs status as Trustee, who is
by definition is a neutral, nominal and/or custodial party - not the creditor whom I allegedly
personally owe money and who has a standing to enforce the note and mortgage in place of
Trust. In other words,"[a] defendant is nominal if there is no reasonable basis for predicting that
it will be held liable." Sha\v v. Dow Brands Inc., 994 F.2d 364, 369(7th Cir.1993).
49. This action is brought in the name of an implied trust, for which US Bank, NA is
designated as trustee. An implied trust cannot be Plaintiff as party to any legal action. Besides
lacking legal standing, it lacks legal existence. Moreover, without an existing trust, the mere self-
naming of oneself as trustee does not create or refer to a trust unless a trust actually exists.
50. Another contradiction to the whole scam is that Wells Fargo Bank, NA holds my alleged
51. Shortly thereafter, Munian filed motion for an order of reference and mailed it to me.
52. In reply, on March 8, 2017 I produced verified answer and counterclaim, filed it in court
53. I incorporate by reference herein procedural history of prior actions since 2009 from this
answer.
54. Munian rejected it without reasoning that her alleged client is surprised and/or prejudiced
12
55. One of the major affirmative defenses in this verified answer was defense that statute of
56. Nobody from Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP has ever rebutted this defense.
57. If statute of limitation indeed has run, that would divest the lower court ofjurisdiction.
I notified Dear of prior history of fraud upon the court by officers of the court and current
fraud upon the court by Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP.
58. In reply to rejected answer and counterclaim, I filed in court NOTICE OF LIMITED
59. In these documents, I challenged jurisdiction of the court for, inter alia, improper service
60. To save trees and environment by saving paper, I incorporate by reference herein all my
61. Because Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP continued to ignore the duty to rebut my averments
and arguments, I also produced cross motion with supporting affidavit in opposition to their
62. In this cross-motion I moved the court for the following relief;
"1. Take judicial notice of Defendant's status as alive man, not juristic entity or
legal fiction such as corporation, trust or estate spelled NAME in all capital letters
on caption and in exhibits ofthis action.
2. As a first step, set in-court identification testimony ofPlaintiff and order
alleged plaintiff s attorney, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN, LLP. to show authority
per New York State Agency laws to represent alleged Plaintiff by disclosing
identity of the parties to retainer per CPLR 3013 and 3015(b), and order
continuance to conduct disclosure.
3. Dismiss the action with prejudice per CPLR §3211 (a)(5)- as 6 years Statute
of Limitation run.
4. Set up Traverse Hearing.
5. Order WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP. to rebut my supporting affidavit
point for point with paper evidence in their possession per CPLR 2214(c) as I
expect that they would not do it intentionally.
6. Thereafter, per CPLR 2214(c) papers to be produced on notice and per CPLR
2218 trial of issue raised on motion compel WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP.
to produce the jury proof ofPlaintiffs standing and identity; direct attorney
allegedly representing corporation or trust in court to appear with corporate
charter and/or other forming documents to rule out champerty, verify Plaintiffs
status, name, address and requirement to post a non-resident bond.
7. Thereafter or alternatively, per CPLR 3024(b) strike affidavits, affirmations
and assignments as bazaar, fabrications, sham, false, prejudicial and misleading;
alternatively, set up Evidentiary Hearing.
63. 8. Dismiss the action with prejudice per CPLR §3211 (a)(1),(2),(3),(5),
(7),(8),(10); §5015 upon the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation; misconduct.
Judiciary 478, evidence tampering and per unclean hands doctrine.
9. Additionally and alternatively, dismiss with prejudice NUNC PRO TUNG the
action per CPLR §3216 for failure to prosecute 2009 action, doctrines of equitable
estoppels and laches.
10. In the event this motion is not persuasive, compel Plaintiff to accept filed
answer with counterclaim per CPLR 3012(d).
11. In addition, for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem Just
and Equitable, including the costs of the cross-motion.
12. Dismiss the action per CPLR §321 1 (a)(1),(2),(3).(5),(7),(8) and dismiss
the action upon the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation and misconduct.
13. Alternatively, dismiss NUNC PRO TUNC the action per CPLR §3216 for
failure to prosecute and doctrine of laches.
14. Alternatively, dismiss the action under doctrine of unclean hands.
15. Sanction attorneys for alleged Plaintiff for frivolously starting this action.
16. Issue entry of default judgment on counter-claim.
17. In the event this motion is lost, compel plaintiff accept my Answer and
counter-claim.
18. In addition, for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem Just
and Equitable, including the costs of the cross-motion."
64. Thereafter I produced affidavit in opposition to motion for an order of reference. Exhibit
65. I incorporate by reference herein all averments and arguments in said affidavit.
14
67. Simultaneously, Jablonski produced APFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION to my cross-
68. This sure reply caused me to amend my cross-motion because in it Jablonski pasted a
web link to SEC,thereby changing his narrative and finally addressing my challenge that U.S.
exist.
which was allegedly attached as Exhibit P in their motion for an order of reference.
70. I addressed this Exhibit P and my documents, which I downloaded from SEC per this
web link in my letters dated March 31, 2018 and April 23, 2018 to Dear, Exhibit M.
71. Jablonski knew or should have known that after SURE REPLY filed. Dear would not
allow me to produce any opposition to his sure reply or would not consider any.
72. Upon using the web link Jablonski provided, I found more puzzles in their narrative and
decided to travel at the headquarters of US Bank, NA in Ohio and Wells Fargo Bank, NA in
South Carolina to investigate and verify Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP narrative and facts.
73. I addressed the results and my findings from the trip in my letters to Dear (with several,
Question raised per §7803 whether the body or officer failed to perform a duty enjoined
upon it by law
74. After so many hundreds of pages of facts, documents and arguments produced by me.
Dear issued false and fraudulent two page Decision and Order completely ignoring my filings
and letters, Exhibit O. In his decision. Dear writes,"To vacate his default, the Defendant was
required to show a reasonable excuse for his delay in serving an answer... Herein, the Defendant
15
denies the allegations against him, asserts that he did not waive his defenses, and states that he
spoke to PlaintifTs counsel on numerous occasions and was unable to obtain information he
requested from her. However, he does not present a reasonable excuse for not timely appearing
75. To demonstrate this fact, I am attaching to the same Exhibit O,documentary evidence
demonstrating that I became a victim of"mortgage foreclosure rescue" scam, of which I notified
Dear in my letter dated April 23, 2018 on page 3(almost entire page). It seems to me that Dear
saw or read only what he wanted to see or read in order to arrive at predetermined outcome in
76. Dear and all these respondents essentially are saying in their paperwork, that the statute
of limitation, fraud, perjury, forgery and misconduct that we all jointly committed does not
matter in this court as long as we can nail Respondent on some procedural technicality and
77. Therefore, I invite this court to read the underlying procedural history together with
affidavits and exhibits, which are a part of this petition, to avoid repetition. These affidavits are
78. According to the above, respondents indeed failed to perform a duty enjoined upon them
by law
79. Entire record ofthis litigation, including letters to Dear, misconduct by attorneys
involved and subsequent cover up with refusal to report attorney misconduct and/or refer this
case for criminal investigation evidences that this decision and order is unfair and incorrect.
Substantial issue specified: Traverse Hearing, compel to accept the answer and rebut my
averments in affidavits are the most important relief on the merits of the case, which Judge
16
Dear deliberately failed to even address in his decision and order
80. No matter how hard Dear tried to change facts in his decision and order, it is void per
legal maxim "Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act."
Trayner, Max. 482. Maxims of Law, Black's Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862
81. In Truax v. Corrigan, 257 US 312(1921), the court held, "the due process clause requires
that every man shall have the protection of his day in court and the benefit of the general law, a
law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds not arbitrary or capriciously but upon
inquiry and renders judgment only after trial so that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty,
property and immunities under the protection of the general rules which govern society.
Hiirtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 535. It, of course, tends to secure equality of law in the
sense that it makes a required minimum of protection for every one's right of life, liberty and
property, which the Congress or the legislature may not withhold. Our whole system of law is
predicated on the general, fundamental principle of equality of application of the law. "All men
are equal before the law," "This is a government of laws and not of men,""No man is above the
law," are all maxims showing the spirit in which legislatures, executives and courts are expected
CONCLUSION
82. I could go on and on, but the picture is clear - all respondents violated my substantive
and procedural due process in order to influence the outcome of litigation in their favor and to
WHEREFORE, I move this Honorable Court to review this Appeal by Petition on the merits in
its entirety, set aside Decision and Order; issue Preliminary Injunction or TRO and send this case
back to another judge to conduct discovery and trial on the merits; and for such other and further
17
relief as to this Court seems just and proper.
NOTARY PUBLIC
^ KRISTEN^RGELtqtN^
Notary Public, «ate ofNew York
NO.01BA6183514
Qualified In Nassau County^/N
Commission Expires 03/17/20^0/
18
EXHIBIT A
1/14/2018 Test/ judge sacked after beer blunder
| New York Post
'Testy'judgesacked after beer blunder
By BiocJ Hamilton July 22.2012 I 4:00am
I'Vl".!
OlS-ROBED: Judge Noach Dear has been let go from the Brooklyn courts after springing a public beer drinker.
https://nypost.coin/2012/07/22Aestyiudge^cked-after-beer-bfunder/ 1/2
1/14/2018 Testy'judge sacked after beer blunder
| New York Post
Judge Noach Dear has
DIS-ROBED:Judge Noach Dear has been let go from the Brooklyn courts after springing a public beer drinker.(Dennis Caruso) bOOted from
Brooklyn Criminal Court a
month after his bizarre ruling barred police from ticketing public drinkers unless cops lab-tested their booze.
The ouster comes amid outrage over his June 14 decision, which dismissed a case against a Brooklyn man,Julio Figueroa, who admitted he
was sipping a beer on the street
The judge concluded that enforcement of laws on drinking iri public is racially biased.
Dear. 59. a scandal-scarred ex-city councilman elected to the bench in 2007 and relegated to hearing low-levei debit disputes in recent
years, had volunteered to take criminal cases on the weekends in a bid to get promoted,courthouse insiders said.
'Somebody here messed up." a court source said."He never should have been given that assignment"
"The judge was,in fact, volunteering on the weekends because of a resource shortage, but at this point his services are no longer needed."
said courts spokesman David Bookstaver.
Dear's ruling nullified a long-accepted police practice — sniffing a suspea's beverage — and meant police would be required to conduct a
chemical analysis to make their cases stick.
Open<ontainer summonses are a widely used policing toot,resulting in more than 12,000 arrests for other crimes in 2011, by one police
supervisor's estimate. Cops wrote 124,498 drinking tickets during the year.
Td say 10 to 15 percent of the time we issue a violation, we find they're wanted for something else," a NYPD source said.
Legal experts slammed Dear's ruling for going well beyond the scope of a judge's authority.
■'He's legislating from the bench," said legal analyst Arthur Aidaia. "He's saying we're not going to enforce the law even though people of
color violate the law. That's ludicrous."
The ruling raised memories of how Dear got his gavel -• in a backroom deal orchestrated by Brooklyn Democratic boss Vito Lopez.
Dear, who spent 18 years as a Democratic city councilman before being term-limited out in 2001, was dogged by scandals, many involving
improper overseas junkets paid for by charities. When he ran for Congress in 1998, his staff allegedly forged signatures to duck campaign-
donation laws.
In 2003, after two years as TLC commissioner, he tried to run again for City Council but was knocked off the ballot for accepting campaign
financing from taxi companies.
Because he had nearly defeated Kevin Parker in a state Senate race In 2002, Lopez saw him as a threat to the party's candidates.
So the boss backed him for judge — even though Dear was never a practicing lawyer and got a thumbs down from the Brooklyn Bar
Association.
https;//nypost.com/2012/07/22/testy-ju(tge-sadted-after-b8er-blunder/ 2/2
1/14/2018 Controversialjudge Noach Dear should be probed: assemblyman
| New York Post
r Yife
Noach Dear
The state's judicial watchdog should investigate controversial Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Noach
Dear,a top lawmaker said.
The Commission on Judicial Conduct has "the right to initiate their own inquiry. I can't envision how they
could be missing this, it's very blatant and it's concerning." said Assemblyman Michael Montesano,the
ranking Republican member of the Judiciary Committee.
The Post has revealed how an ex-con is a regular in Dear's courtroom and helps steer deadbeat
ControversialJudge Noach defendants to lawyers who then get their clients favorable deals before the judge.
Dear Is gunningfor more
power
httpsJ7nypost.coin/2017/10/1S/ccntroverslaHudge-noactvdear-should-be-probed-assemblyman/ 1/2
1/14/2018 Controversial judge Noach Dear should be probed: assemblyman
| New York Post
The former felon. Chaiin Pinkesz. also worked behind the scenes to help get Dear elected to the state
Supreme Court in 2015.sources told The Post.
Dear, who handled consumer debt cases in Civil Court before his election to the higher bench, managed to get himself back to his old
courtroom on Mondays and Tuesdays to continue to hear those cases. Many involve members of his own Orthodox Jewish community.
The Commission on Judicial Conduct's probes are secret and its adminisuator. Robert Tembeckjian, would not comment on Dear.
A spokesman for the state court system said Dear's assignment would be reviewed at the end of the year along with those of other judges.
The court system has maintained that Dear Is helping out in the lower court because it was "strapped for resources."
After a political career dogged by corruption scandals. Dear was elected to the bench in 2007 despite being deemed "not qualified" by
both the Brooklyn and New York bar associations.
His fate is now squarely in Gov.Cuomo's hands. Dear has applied for one of the top Jobs in the court system — presiding justice of the
Appellate Division Second Department in Brooklyn — and a screening committee made its recommendations to Cuomo's office earlier this
month.
htlps://nypostcom/20l7/10/1S/oontroveislaHudge-noach-dear-should-be-probed-assemblyman/ 2/2
1/14/2018 This ex-con Is a (riend to at) debt-rattted deadbeats I New York Post
■fjjjKi''
Chaim Pinkesz
A convicted fraudster spends his days in a Brooklyn courtroom steering deadbeats to lawyers in debt-collection cases that often get
favorable rulings by controversial Judge Noach Dear. The Post has learned.
And the ex-con, Chaim Pinkesz. helped put the Jurist on the bench, sources said.
Pinkesz. 58, acts as a messlah-like figure in his Orthodox Jewish neighborhood, holding "office hours" in his home for debtors and others
who need lawyers.
Pinkesz is part of the Shmira neighborhood safety patrol, and keeps a scooter parked outside his Borough Park home where he also holds
fund-raisers for political candidates and ran a charity to help single mothers.
But behind the scenes, he has been accused in court papers of threats and harassment.
Lawyer Alan Rubenstein. who is embroiled with Pinkesz in a legal dispute over a $5 million life- insurance policy, alleged in a letter to
Supreme Court Justice Johnny Lee Baynes that "these threats began literally the moment this action was commenced and occurred even In
httpsJ/nypost.com/2017/10/08/thls-ex-con-is-a4nend-to-ali-debt-rattled-deadbeat8/ 1/2
1/14A2018 This ex-con is a friend to all debt-rattled deadbeats
| New York Post
the courtroom Itself. His threats ran the gamut and included threatening me with criminal prosecution, disbarment and financial ruination."
Pinkesz. who pied guilty in 1986 to trafficking in counterfeit merchandise like phony Cartier watches,for which he served four months in
federal prison, denied threatening Rubenstein.
In Dear's courtroom, which handles consumer-debt matters.Pinkesz introduces defendants from the Orthodox community to lawyers.
Dear is known for routinely dismissing consumer-debt cases or forcing settlements that favor debtors over banks or collection agencies. He
heard the cases for many years as a Brooklyn Civil Courtjudge before winning a term on the higher Supreme Court In 2015.
But Dear recently managed to get back to Civil Court on Mondays and Tuesdays, when members of the Orthodox community are frequent
defendants.
On two days last month,Pinkesz darted in and out of the courtroom and was spotted at one point huddled in a hallway engaging in a
lengthy conversation with a lawyer and a Hasidic defendant.
Pinkesz. who is also known as Edward or Joseph,told The Post he earned his living as an insurance agent and was a 'community activist"
who liked to provide moral support to those in court.
"I never take money." he said. "If anybody offers me money. I get very, very upset."
Pinkesz said he knows Dear "just like everybody else knows him. from the community."
But Pinkesz actively campaigned to win Dear his Supreme Court seat — a job that pays $194,000 annually and comes with a 14-year term —
according to one Jewish leader.
Pinkesz did political work such as witnessing petition signatures for Ari Kagan,an influential Democratic district leader in Brooklyn,in an
attempt to gamer Kagan's support for Dear's Judicial nomination,the source said.
In 2015. district leaders hammered out a backroom deal between Orthodox Jews backing Dear and a reformer contingent supporting Civil
Court Judge Debra Silber. Under the agreement brokered by Kagan and other district leaders, each faction agreed to approve the other's
candidate. The Post previously reported.
Demoaatic nominees are typically assured victory in New York City once they are placed on the ballot by a nominating committee.
Pinkesz has donated $18,000 to local political campaigns and committees since 2013.including $750 to Kagan and Kagan's Bay Democrats
political committee.
Kagan said he backed Dear on his merits and did not recall if Pinkesz asked him for any support. Pinkesz claimed ignorance on any
conversations with Kagan about Dear,who through a court spokesman declined to comment
https://nypostcom/2017/10/OB/this-ex-con-Is-a-friend-to-all-debt-rattled-deadbeats/ 2/2
1/14/2018 Judge in line for NY Supreme Court post amid 'back-room deal'
| New York Post
iiiwHiliiH
i!fi
Noach Dear
Civil Court Judge Noach Dear — who was booted from the Criminal Court bench three years ago after making insensitive racial remarks and
head-scratching rulings — is up for a promotion thanks to a back-room political deal.
Brooklyn Democrats voted Thursday night to make Dear a candidate for the higher state Supreme Court in a horse trade between social-
reform and establishment factions of the party.
Orthodox Jews backing Dear,a Borough Park political fixture for three decades,agreed to drop their opposition to Debra Silber. Brooklyn's
first openly lesbian Civil Court judge, whose term Is up.sources said. In return, reformers who had been touting Silber for five years held
their noses and approved Dear's candidacy, after blocking it a year before.
httpsJ/nypost.coin/201S/08tt74udse4n4ine-fbr-ny-8upreme-court-post-amid-b8ck-rooin-deat/ 1/2
1/14/2018 Judge in Une for NY Supreme Court post amid 'back-room deal'
| New York Post
"The reformers are a bunch of whores. The reformers should be better than thissaid one city Dem who believes Dear should not be near a
courtroom. "I should just move out of the state now."
The 61-year-old jurist was booted from the Criminal Court bencii in July 2012 by Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman after Dear ruled that cops
must prove a beverage contains alcohol through lab tests — rather than using the sniff test — before handing out open-container tickets,
and asserting that he had never arraigned a white person for public drinking.
In August 2012.credit-card companies demanded his recusal from debt-collection lawsuits in civil court because they said he dismissed
nearly every company claim In favor of alleged deadbeats.saying the creditors couldn't prove the identities of the debtors.
Despite his resume,several hundred party loyalists signed off on Dear and four other candidates at their judicial convention at St. Francis
College Thursday.
Dear, who skipped the vote, did not return calls seeking comment.
The nomination amounts to a coronation: Brooklyn Republicans also voted Thursday to cross-endorse the Democrats'judicial slate.
As a Supreme Court justice, he would make $167,700 and handle bigger criminal or civil cases, with a term that runs through 2030.
As a city councilman In the 1980s, Dear pulled down between $20,000 and $60,000 from a charity he directed that flew his family to Israel.
Europe and the Soviet Union.
Dear was the subject of a federal complaint alleging a six-figure campaign donation from straw donors after mounting two unsuccessful
congressional campaigns in 1998 and 2000.
And he also once organized a junket to South Africa that the whites-only Johannesburg City Council funded,drawing the ire of his
colleagues.
"He was recommended by the vast, vast majority and he has done a really decentjob." said Brooklyn Democratic Party attorney Frank
Carone.
"Noach pretty much had the votes no matter whaC said Democratic District Leader Josh Skaller."We might not have gotten Debra without
the package. It was pretty much a calculation."
httpsJ/nypostcam/201S/09/27/iudge-in-flne-for-ny-supreme-court-po&t-amtd-back-foom-deaI/ 2/2
1/14/2018 Noach Dear allows deadbeats to cheat debt: lawyers
| New York Post
Noach Dear
Controversial state Supreme Court Judge Noach Dear managed to give himself a demotion — returning to a lower court two days a week
where lawyers say he routinely allows deadbeats to cheat debt.
On Mondays and Tuesdays. Dear sits in the Brooklyn Civil Court room he used to occupy before his election to the state Supreme Court and
doles out his unique brand of Justice.
Dear appears to be particularly popular among members of his own Orthodox Jewish community, who disproportionately seem to get their
cases heard before him instead of other Civil Court judges.
On three Mondays when Dear was on vacation in August,the courtroom was devoid of Orthodox defendants. But they returned when the
judge did on Sept 5.
Since another judge sits Wednesday through Friday."Orthodox cases before Dear are adjourned to Mondays or Tuesdays — no other
dates," one lawyer said. The Post oliserved that he also adjourned non-Orthodox cases to his days in court.
https://hypo&tcom/2017/08/24/noach-dear-aIlows-deadbeats-to-cheal-debt4awym/ 1/3
1/14/2018 Noach Dear allows deadbeats to cheat debt: lawyers
| New York Post
Lawyers complain that Dear often throws out cases brought by credit-card companies or small businesses against consumers who haven't
paid their bills or — lawyers say — pushes those plaintiffs to accept lowball settlements.
"Case is dismissed. Have a nice day." he said to one stunned defendant last week.
The woman told The Post she had come to court expecting a battle over her S1.400 credit-card bill. "I didn't have to fight or nothing." said
the thrilled defendant.
It was the lawyers for credit-card and coIlecUon companies who celebrated in 2015 when Dear won the state Supreme Court post, hopeful
they could finally taste legal victory under a replacementjudge.
But Just nine months after Dear was elected to the higher bench,he returned part-time to his former courthouse to oversee the low-level
debt cases.
After he was elected to Civil Court In 2007, he was so desperate to get a promotion.The Post reported,that he volunteered for a weekend
stint in Criminal Court
But he was booted after controversially ruling in a 2012 case that cops should lab-test liquids for alcohol before enforcing public-drinking
taws.
Dear's election to Supreme Court was thanks to a backroom deal with Brooklyn Dems.The Post reported.
"I've never seen someone resurrect himself from the pits of the Supreme Court like he was able to do." one lawyer told The Post.
Once back in Civil Court, creditors' lawyers say, Dear has continued to treat them like the enemy. He pressures defendants to take
settlements that leave banks and other creditors accepting much less then what they claim they're owed,lawyers said.
"It's exactly what he says or nothing. You either take it or you're going to get screwed." said one of five plaintiff's lawyers who spoke to The
Post.
Another lawyer said trying a credit case before Dear Is a "suicide mission."
During trials. Dear's standard line is that he doesn't find the witness for the credit<ard or collection company "credible." lavtryers said.
Earlier this month.Dear suggested that a case against a Hasidic .man v,rho owed S7.200 be dropped after the man claimed some of the
credit card charges were fraudulent
"I think Judge Dear Is fair," Joseph Harrison, who represents members of the Orthodox community,told The Post "I've had worse
experiences with other judges in the building."
Joshua Bronstein,a lawyer who also represents the Orthodox community, has racked up a string of favorable outcomes for his clients in
front of Dear In the last year,including a $15,694 debt settled for $2,000;a $19,992 debt slashed to $3,500; and a $5,612 debt cut by 90
percent to $561. records show.
A half dozen cases were "discontinued" with nothing in the case file to indicate a settlement, likely meaning they were simply dropped.The
vanquished debts ranged from $2,568 to $21,562.
During one of Bronstein's cases that wentto trial last November. Discover bank presented a thick file of outstanding bills against a
Connecticut woman who owed $11,148 to retailers like Bloomingdsle's. Anthropologie and Saks Fifth Avenue.
Yet Dear ruled against Discover saying it had "failed to prove its case." •
Bronstein declined to talk to The Post Dear did not return a request for comment.
A court system spokesman called Dear's assignment a "mutual decision." contending that the civil court was "strapped for resources."
httpsJ/nyposl.com/20t7/09/24/noach-<lear-aiIows-d8adbeats-to-cfteat-debt-lawy8rs/ 2/3
1/14/2018 Noach Dear allows deadbeats to cheat debt; lawyers
| New York Post
"His going over to the tower court is an efflcient way to hear the cases." Lucian Chalfen said.
https'7/nypost.com/2017/09/24/noach-de8r-8lIowsKie8dbe8ts-to>cheat-debt-lawyer8/ 3/3
1/14/2018 Brooklyn judge wipes out'mtlDons' in credit card debt
| New York Post
https://nypost.eom/2012/08/26/brook!yn:judge-w!pes-out-mnilons-ln-credit-card-debt/ 1/4
1/14/2018 Brooklyn judge wipes out'millions' in credit card debt
| New York Post
i
ifvii
11
PAYLESS: Brooklyn Judge Noach Dear rarely sides with creditors,lawyers told The Post,instead heaping 'Twilight Zone'-like windfalls on credit-card
deodbeats.
Maxed out your credit cards? No problem. You've got a Dear friend in court
(Dennis Caruso)
Brooklyn state Civil Court Judge Noach Dear has tossed reams of cases against alleged deadbeats who stiffed Visa.
American Express and other creditors, lising any excuse to wipe out their debts,say plaintiff lawyers.
Half a dozen attorneys who appear regularly before Dear told The Post they couldn't remember winning any credit-card cases in his court,
even when defendants admitted they owed money.
"He literally throws out millions of[dollars] a year that is legitimately owed to direct creditors like Citibank and Discover." said one lawyer.
https://nypost.com/2012/08/26/l)rooklyn-judge-wipes-out-mil!ions-in-credit-card-debt/ 2/4
1/14/2018 Brooklyn judge wipes cut'miilions' in credit card debt
| New York Post
"With Judge Dear, it's dismiss,dismiss, dismiss." said another plaintiff attorney who asked not to be identified. "It's impossible to win a case.
It's like "The Twilight Zone."'
In Dear's sprawling. Ilth-floor courtroom in Downtown Brooklyn, there's no secret whose side he's on.
"I like to fight for the underdog." he once said — adding that he believed SO percent of credit-card debt to be faulty.
So he routinely dismisses motions by collectors, finds fault with their records and witnesses and makes quick rulings against them,
sometimes proceeding right to trial the first time a matter is in front of him.lawyers said.
One suit involved Felicia Tancreto. a 55-year-old Bensonhurst resident who was found by another judge to owe $16,107.12 on her AmEx
platinum Costco card — a debt she'd racked up through personal shopping.
Tancreto appealed the judgment before Dear in April, claiming she contacted the credit-card company sometime in 2010. notifying it that
she was undergoing surgery and couldn't keep up payments.
She said that she asked to have the bills deferred and that the company sued.
Dear ruled in her favor, canceling the entire balance because he deemed the company's key witness, Lisa Salas. a 25-year employee in
accounting, not aedible. The judge called her testimony "robo."
The term,coined from a similar and scandalous tactic in the mortgage-fraud crisis, describes a practice in which collectors present mass-
produced sworn statements to back their claims.
The problem with the AmEx accountant and documents she presented in support of Trancreto's debt was that Salas did not have "personal"
knowledge of the charges. Dear argued.
AmEx followed up with an unusual motion: It asked Dear to step aside on its cases, arguing that he'd lost all objectivity as a judge.
Dear showed "prejudice, impropriety,lack of impartiality and bias." said lawyer Anthony Migliaccio.
Critics of the collection industry say it's plagued by abuse, particularly when third parties buy up debt for pennies on the dollar and then
hound cardholders,sometimes using shady "robo" tactics.
Often these the agencies have no reliable information about what might be owed.
Dear is not the only judge to go to bat for deadbeats — or to slam collectors for using robo testimony.
Nassau County Judge Michael Ciaffa also makes this claim when holding debt chasers accountable.
Ciaffa recently ruled against Discover in its bid to collect $4,600 from cardholder Patrick Shimer. blasting Discover's account manager,
Stacey Holmes,for lacking knowledge aljoutthe charges.
"The affidavit signed by Ms. Holmes has the look and feel of a robo-signed affidavit that was prepared in blank in advance of knowing who
would sign the affidavit." the jurist wrote.
"Although she purportedly made the affidavit based on her review of the plaintiff's business records, she evidently had no idea when she
signed the affidavit that the last statement showed a $0.00 new balance."
Ciaffa noted that robo signing didn't automatically nullify a debt, but "it gives this court pause."
One lawyer said there was a "big difference between Judge Dear and Judge Ciaffa.
"Ciaffa knows what he's doing, and he's carefully applying the law. He doesn't expect a business- records witness to remember having sent
a bill to a certain cardholder on a certain date.
https://nypostcom/2012/08/26/broo1dyn-judge-wipes-out-mtl!ions-in-credit-C8rd-debt/ 3/4
1/14/2018 Brooklyn judge wipes out'milUons'in aedit card debt
| New York Post
"Also, we've won cases before him."
https;//nypost.ccm/2012/08/26/brooklyn-Judge»wip89-aut-mitiions-in-credit-card*debt/ 4/4
1/14/2018 Controversial judge Noach Dear Is gunning for more power j New York Post
Noach Dear
Coi-ilroversial Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Noach Dear is eager to wield more power — and has applied for a job running the appeals
court that covers the city's outer boroughs and surrounding suburbs. The Post has learned.
The former pol was interviewed last week in a bid to become presiding justice of the Appellate
Division's Second Department in Brooklyn, according to sources familiar with the application process.
A screening committee also met with several other applicants for the post,then sent a secret list of
recommendations to Gov. Andrew Cuomo,the sources said.
The Post has revealed that Dear,a former Civil Courtjudge who was eleaed to the state Supreme Court
in 2015. recently got himself transferred back to Civil Court two days a week to handle consumer debt
cases — mainly involving members of his Orthodox Jewish community.
https://nypost.eom/2017/10/10/controvGr8iaHudge-noach-dear-ls-gunning-for-more-power/ 1/2
1/14/2018 Controveisial judge Noach Dear is gunning for more power
| New Yoiic Post
Cuomo's office didn't return a request for comment A woman who answered the phone at Dear's Noach Dearallows
deadbeatsto cheat debt:
house said he wasn't there and hung up.
lawyers
https;//nypostcom/20l7/10/10/controversiaHudge-noach-dear-is-gunning-for-more-power/ 2/2
1/14/2018 Noach dear, again
| New York Post
IpPINIONJ
Noach dear,again
By Posi Staff Report June 17.2012 I 4:003m
irm;.
'yi.
Looks like Nicholas Garaufis Isn't the only autocratic Judge riding a bench In Brooklyn.
hRps://nypostcom/20l2/06/17/naach-dear-again/ 1/3
1/14/2018 Noach dear, again
| New York Post
Acting Supreme Court Justice Noach Dear has carried Judlciai activism to the height of Insanity by ruling that cops must prove that a
beverage is alcoholic before issuing a summons for public drinking.
Just sineliing it isn't enough, he ruled — now each sample must be lab-tested, or he's going to throw out the summons.
Which is exactly what he did in one case — even though the person cited actually admitted that he was violating the law.
Dear says that by demanding a higher standard of proof in violations of the open-container law, he's hoping to pretty much end — or at least
reduce — actual enforcement of the statute.
Yes.the NYPD comes down hard on public drinking,issuing more summonses for it last year than for any other violation.
The summons,even with its relatively low fine, allows cops to check the person being ticketed for outstanding warrants.
Indeed, it's the very basis of the so-called broken-windows approach to police work — that small crimes and/or blight,just like a single
broken window in an abandoned building,inevitably lead to chaos and decay if ignored.
it's precisely the approach that reclaimed New York's streets fiom the thugs and led to historic drops in crime that continue to this day.
Which is why the NYPD still focuses on seemingly minor quaiity-of-life offenses.
Of course, he's perhaps New York's least likely Jurist, never having even practiced law before being elected to Civil Court.
His previous stints as a City Council member and Taxi & Limousine commissioner were undistinguished,to put it mildly, and he was
constantly under one ethical cloud or another.
Now, he's reportedly eyeing a return to electoral politics — where a populist appeal certainly won't hurt.(He did much the same thing by
dismissing debt-collection cases en masse.)
https://nypost.com/2012/06/1T/noach-dear-agaln/ 2/3
1/14/2018 Noach dear,again
| New York Post
Plaintiff,
SUMMONS
FORECLOSURE ACTION
V.
Index No.:
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE INTERNAL
REVENUE SERVICE,CITY OF NEW YORK PARKING
VIOLATIONS BUREAU,
and JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in the above action and serve
a copy of your Answer on the plaintiffs attorney within twenty (20) days after the service of this
Summons, exclusive of the day of service, or within thirty (30) days after completion of service
where service is made in any other manner than by personal delivery within the State. The United
States of America,if designated as a defendant in tMs action, may answer or appear within sixty
(60) days of service hereof. In case of your failure to e^pear or answer,judgment will be taken
Kings County is designated as the place of trial. The basis of venue is the location of the
mortgaged premises.
(3895597:)
1 a-?
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF KINGS
Plaintiff
FORECLOSURE
I
COMPLAINT
V.
Defendants.
Plaintiffalleges:
1. Plaintiff is a national association duly organized and existing under the laws of the
United States ofAmerica.
2. Upon infoimation and belief,the defendants reside at or have offices at the locations
3. Defendants are made parties to this action in the capacities setforth in Exhibit"A."
4. The defendant Michael Krichevsky, ("principal defendant") executed a note or
notes as more particularly described and set forth in Exhibit "B" annexed hereto and made a part
hereof(the note or notes set forth in Exhibit "B" are collectively hereinafter referred to as the
"Note").
5. Plaintiff is the owner and holder of the subject mortgage and note, or has been
delegated the authority to institute a mortgage foreclosure action by the owner and holder of the
{3895597:}
11. Upon infonnation and belief, all applicable mortgage taxes were paid at the time of
13. Plaintiff issued a 90 day notice to the principal defendant in the prescribed form
pursuant to Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law §1304 on December 22,2015.
14. Plaintiff has complied with the provisions of RPAPL §1306 and the loan at issue in
this action complied with the provisions ofBanking Law §§ 595-a,6-1 and 6-m,as applicable.
15. As a result of the principal defendant's de&ult by failing to make his payments as
promised in the Note and Mortgage,the plaintiff has previously elected and hereby elects to call due
the entire amount presently secured by the Mortgage, plus accrued interest, together with amounts
plaintiff has paid or may pay for real property taxes, insurance and/or attorneys' fees as provided by
16. During the pendency of this action, the plaintiff may be compelled to pay local
taxes, assessments, water rates, insurance premiums and other charges affecting the mortgaged
premises. In that event,the plaintiffrequests that such amounts with interest,should be added to the
17. There are no other actions or pending proceedings at law to collect or enforce the
18. All defendants in this action claim to have some interest in or lien upon the real
property covered by the Mortgage. All ofthe defendants' interests are subordinate to the plaintiffs
interest
{3895597:)
(c) declaring that the mortgaged premises and personal property and fixtures be
(d) awarding the sale proceeds to the plaintiffto the extent determined under(a)
above;
(e) declaring that any ofthe parties to this action may become a purchaser upon
such sale;
any deficiency ofthe indebtedness that may remain after applying the proceeds ofthe real property,
personal property and fixtures, and granting plaintiffa moneyjudgment for that amount,provided a
motion for a deficiency judgment shall be made as prescribed by Section 1371 of the Real Property
Plaintiff specifically reserves its rights to share in any surplus monies arising from
the sale of the mortgaged premises by virtue of its position as a lien creditor other than by the
Mortgage.
(389SS97:}
1 an
EXHIBIT B
Noteis}:
Note from Michael Krichevsky, dated December 14, 2005, in the original principal amount of
$747,600.00, plus interest("Note").
Mortgagdsk
Mortgage from Michael Krichevsky, dated December 14,2005, in the original principal amount of
$747,600,00,and recorded in the Office ofthe City Register ofthe City ofNew York on December
21,2005 as document CRFN 2005000701375.
Said Mortgage was assigned by an Assignment of Mortgage executed on August 25, 2009 and
recorded in the Office of the City Register ofthe City ofNew York on October 19,2009 in CRFN
2009000339958.
A Corrective Assignment of Mortgage was executed on August 29, 2013 to correct the said
Assignment recorded in the Office of the City Register of the City of New York on October 19,
2009 in CRFN 2009000339958 as relates to the assignee. Said Corrective Assignment of Mortgage
was recorded in the Office ofthe City Register ofthe City ofNew York on September 17,2013 in
CRFN 2013000380865.
{389SS97:)
Q an
/
I Will make all payments under this Note in the form of cash, check or money order.
I understand that the Lender may transfer this Note, The Lender or anyone who this Note hy transfer
and who is entitled to receive payments under this Note is called the "Nc(e Holder."
2. INTEREST
Interest will be charged on unpaid principal UQtil (he fiallamoum ofPrincipal has been paid. 1 will pay
inter^tat ayeariy xateof fi.sCO %. The interest rate I wQl pay will change in accordance wlA
Section 4 of this Note.
Hw interest rate lequiied by this Section 2 and Section 4 of this Note is the rate I will pay both before and
after any de&ult describe in ^tion 7(B)of this Note.
3. PAYMENTS
(A) tYme and Place ofPayments
I will make a payment every month on ths first day of the month beginning on FEBRUARY or ,
2006 . I. will make these payments every month until I have paid all of the principal and iitteresi and any
other charge described below that1 may owe under this Note. Eadi monthly payment wUi be applied as of its
scbeditied doejdate and if the payment consists ofboth principal and interest, it will be applied to Interest before
PfipclpaL-If. on ■ JANUARY 01 . 2036 .1 still owe amonnta under ttus Note^ I will pay those
amounts in ftiH on ihatdatCi which is called the "Maturi^ Date."
I.wlll m^ mqn^ pi^in^ at 1333 fiOTH STREET.2ND FLOOR
BROOKLYN.NEW YORK 11210
or at a diffcrertt place ifiequired by the Note Holder.
(B) Amonnl of^Initial Monthly Payments
_ ]^ore.ftte fiWf ainorttelng.principal and interest payment doe date stated in subsection(Q below (the
"First P&I Paynpi{^t.Due Qate"), my monthly payments will be only for the interest due on the unpaid princlp^
of this.Note);. -'VvV-- -
Eacb^of ray Initial iimntidy.payments will be in the amount of U.S.$ 4.049.S0 . This amount
may change in gjBcp^ttce witbieubBection(C)below.
(C) Montiily ^mmAChanges ^
The First Pdtl:Pavmeia"Due Date is the first day of FRBROARy 2011 ,
LOAN NO.:
MINNO.; . . initlBls /La /C
MULTISTATB INITIAL ISTBBSST AJUVSTABLB BATS NOIS.t'Vnr UM&IodM(Anaoabb fttter IhIKbI Pcrtod)*510110 WmUy•
ertesb Mm OmVORM INSIRUMBNT
Z>oc»Bp£eBKies3;Jire i>o»i>M8ssiiMdM ■ Page 1 of S ■ Form 5537 5/04(tev.7/05)
ORIGINAL
11 f^^■F A"?
5. BORRO^VBR'S RIGHT TO PREPAY
I bave the tight to jnakepaymenia ofPrincipal at any timebefoce they are due. A payment of Pxincioal
only Is known as a ''Pfq)aymeni.* When1 make a Piepaymeat, I will leU the Note Holdei in writing that 1 am
doing so. 1 may not deslgnatea p^ment as aPr^tayment ifIbave not made all the monthly payments due
under the Note.
1 may make a ftiltPf^ymeiu ox partial Prepayments without paying a Prepayment charge. The Note
Holder wui use my Prepayments to reduce the amount ofPrincipal Ihatl owe tutto this Note. However, the
Note Holder tn^ apply Pr^ayment to the accrued and unpaid interest on the Prepayment amount before
applying ny Pr^aymeiu to reduce the Piinc^al amount ofthe Note. If I make a partial Prepayment, there
will be no changes in the due dates of my montUy piymenl unless the Note Holder agrees in writing to the
i%koROAO •
ifI make a partial Prepayment during the period ending with the due date of my last interest only inonUdy
payment, my partial .Pie|»yinent will reduce, the amount of ray monthly payment. If I make a i^aJ
Px^ayment after the last Interest only mo.ntiiIy payment, my partial Prqtayment may reduce(be anunUit of my
monthly payments beginning with the monthly payment due after the Interest Change Date following the partial
Prepayment. After the first Interest Ciiange Date,-any reduction due to nry partial Prepayment may te onset by
an interest rate Increase.
6. LOAN CHARGES
If a law, which applies to this loan and which sets miaxiraum loan charges, is ilnal(y interpreted so that (he
interest or otherloan charges collected or to be collected in connection WlA this loan exceed the pendtted
limits, then; (a)any such loan charge shall b^ reduced by the amount necessaiy to reduce the charge to the
permitted limit; and(b)any sums already collected Gromme which exceeded permitted limiu will be zefiinded
to me. The Note Holder may choose to make this re&nd by reducing the Principal I owe under this Note or by
making a direct payment tome. If a rehind reduces Principal, the reduction will be treated as a paiUal
Prepayment.
1 -a rt-F A n
IfalloranypartoflheProfpertyoi any Inlereat in the Property is sold or itynafffTrt><t (or if
Borrower is not a natural person and a beneficial interest in fionower is sold or Iransfeired) without
Lento's prior written consent. Lender raay lecpiire Immediate payment in tbU of all sums secured by
this Security Instrument. However, this option shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise Is
prohibited by Applicable Law. Lender also shall not exercise this option if: (a)Borrower causes to be
submitted to Lender information required by Lender to evaluate the intended transferee as if a new loan
were bdng made to the tmnsfexee; and (b)Lender reasonably determines ttot Lender's security wiU not
be impaired by the loan assumption and that the risk ofa breach of any covenant or agreement in this
Security Insimment Is acceptable to Lender.
To the extent peimhted by Appficable Law. Lender may diarge a leasonable fee as a condition to
Lender's consent to the loan assumption. Lei^er may alar require the innsferee to sign an assumption
agreement that Is acceptable to Leader and that obligates the iiansfetee to keep all the promises and
agiecmentsmade in the Note and in this SecuriQr Instrument. Bonower will continue to be obligated
under the Note and this Security Instfument nnl^ Lender tdeases Borrower in writing.
IfLender exercises(he option to require immediate payment In fhll, Lender shall give Borrower
notice of accelmtion. The notice shall provide a period ofnot less t^ 30 days fiioro the date the
notice is given in accordance with Section 15 within which Boixower nrasi pay all sums secured by.(his
Security Insuumem. IfBonower fails'to pay theK sums p^ot to(he eviration ofthis period. Lender
may invoke any remedies permitted by this Security Instrument without further notice or demand on
Borrower.
P/
NA
-<Scal) WrfKQOTBEfSQlJIIflg (Seal)
•Bonower Bonower
MICHAEL XRICHEVSKY
(Seal)
ivmmer,Sr.VtomnfatRf (Seal)
•Botzowet •Bonower
.(Seal) (Seal)
•Borrower -Bonower
BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR BANC OF
n Original Only)
FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
SERIES 2006-F
** .
U8.Bert!Bano
Mauoisi A8S0dy» m ^
"'irtgago PAROOE>iMK,ry|.A. of America Funriino Co^r'-'un
OotSitaSaa.8««a
vriihciul racouma.
. an M. Mifte, ^oo
MULTISTATE DUTlAla IN1EBSST ADJUSTABLB RATS NOTB•l.Vtar UBOR tadax (AtiustsU* •fter lalllal Pirlod}•StoBtc Pumny•
FTtddU Mm(MTORM OISTRIIMENT
DacniBfSeRncB$.Jtic. vosa.iaiiani-9M Page 5 of S PormSSa? 5/04(rev. 7/OS)
LOAN NO.: HHi ORIGINAL MINNO.:
1 ti An
EXHIBIT D
Property Address:
4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn,NY 11224
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Borough of Brooklyn,
County of Kings, City and State of New York, known and designated on map entitled "Map of
Section A Norton Point" made by Font and Beach Surveyors, 1894 and filed in the Office of
Register Kings County, April 20,1894,#351-352-353 in Block #7 of said map and described with
reference to the private road,laid down on said map as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the Northerly line of Atlantic Avenue on said map, 160 feet Westerly
from the intersection ofsaid Northerly line with the Westerly side ofBeach 42nd Street;
RUNNING THENCE Westerly along the Northerly line of Atlantic Avenue as it curves to the
Westerly line of lot 351 on said map;
THENCE Northerly along the Westerly line of lot 351 (which line is on a radius of the concentric
curves of Atlantic and Surf Avenues); ICQ feet to the middle line of block between Atlantic and Surf
Avenues;
THENCE Easterly along the middle line of the block as it curves,60 feet to the Westerly line of lot
354 on said map;
THENCE Southerly at right angles to Atlantic Avenue and along the Westerly line ofsaid lot #354,
100 feet to the point or place ofBEGINNING.
(3895597:)
1*7 dl
NYC DEPARTIVIENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY REGISTER
PROPERTY DATA
BorouRh Block Lot Unit Address
BROOKLYN 7026 53 EnllieLot 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
Property T^pe: 1- 2 FAM WITH ATTCH GARiOR VACANT LAND
PARTIES
MORTGAGER/BORROWER: MORTGAGEE/LENDER:
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY FAIRMONT FUNDING LTD, A NEW YORK
120 OCEANA DRIVE W.. CORPORATION
BROOKLYN.NY 11235 133360TH STREET
BROOKLYN. NY 11219
1 Q A~>
(G)"Loan." Tlie "Loan" means(he debt evidenced by(he Note, plus interest, aity ptepayment charges and
late charges due under the Note, and all suns due under this Security Instniment, plus interest.
(H)"Sums Seciiiul." The amounts described below in the section titled "Borrower's Transfer to Lender of
Rights in the Property" sometlnies will be called the "Sons Secured."
(I) "RIdera." AH Riders attached to (his Security Instrument (hat are signed by Borrower be called
"Riders." The following Riders are to be signed by Borrower[^eck box as applicable]:
Qj Adjustable Rate Rider □ Condominium Rider □ Second Home Rider
Q Balloon Rider Q Planned Unit Development Rider Q Assumption Rider
Q 1-4 Family Rider Q BiweeWy Payment Rider □ Inter Vivos Trust Rider
Q Othci(s) [specify]:
(J) "Applicable Law." AS controlling applicable federal, slate and local statutes, r^ulations, ordinances and
admiiUstratlve rules and crdeis (that bave the elfea of law) as well as bXI applicable final, non-appealable
judicial opinions will be called "Applicable Law."
(K) "Community Association Dues, Fees and Asscssmoits." All dues, fees, assessments and other charges
that are Imposed on Borrower or the PropeiQt by a condominium association, homeowners asscdatlon or
similar or^nlzation will be called "Community Association Dues, Fees and Assessments."
(L) "Electronic Funds TVansfer." "Electianic Funds Transfer" means any transfer of money, other than ^
check, draft, or similar paper instnunent, whidi is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephonic
instrument, computer, or mapetic tape so as to order, instnict, or authorize a financial Instimtlon to debit or
credit an account. Some common exani^les of an Electronic Funds Transfer are point-of-sale txansfeis (where a
card such as an aas^ Of debit card is us^ at a merchant), automated tdler marine (or ATM) transactions,
transfers initiated by t^qdione, wire transfers, and automated cleanngbouse transfers.
(M) "Escrow Umns." Those items that are described in Section 3 will be called "Escrow Kerns."
(N) "Miscellaneous Fnceeds," "Miscellaneous Proceeds" means any compensaUon, settlement, award of
damages, or proceeds paid by any third par(y (other fiian insurance proceeds paid under the coverages described
in Section 5) for: (i) damage to, or destruction of, (he Property; (li) condemnation or other taking of all or any
part of the Prope^, (III) conveyance in lieu of condemnadoo or sale to avoid condemnation; or (iv)
misrepresentations oL or omissions as to, the value and/or condifion of the Proper^. A taking of the Property
by any govenunenlal auttoriQ' by eminem domain is known as "condemnation."
(O) "Mortgage Insurance." "Mortgage Insurance" means insurance protecting L^tder against the nonpayment
of, or default on, the Loan.
(P) "Periodic Paymoit." The regularly scheduled amount due for (i) principal and interest under the Note,
plus (ii) any amounts under Section 3 will be called 'Periodic Payment."
((2) "RESPA." "RESPA" means (he Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.) and its
implementing regulation, Regulation X (24 C.F.R. Part 3500), as they might be amended from lime to time, oi
any additional or successor legislation or regulation that governs the same subject matter. As used in this
Security Instnunent, "RESPA" refers to all requUements and restrictions (hat are imposed in regard to a
"federally related mortgage loan" even if the Loan does not quality as a "federally related mortgage loan" under
RESPA.
OI an
(E) All flxtiiies that are now or in Ibc future will be on the Fioperty described in subsections(Aland (B)of
this section;
(F) All ofthe rights and property described in subsections(B)through(E)of this section thati acquire In
the iiituie; and
(G) All reptacementa ofor additions to the Property described in subsections(B)through(F)of this section
and all proceeds of insurance for loss or damage to, and all Miscellaneous Proceeds of the Prop^
described in subsections(A)through(P)of this section.
I promise that: (A)1 lawfully own the Property: (E) 1 have the right to mortgage, grant and convQr the
Property to Lender; and(Q there are no outstanding claims or charges against die Proper^, except for those
which are ofpublic record.
t give a general warranty of title to Lender. This means that I wilt be fhlly responsible for any losses which
Lender suffers becausesomeone other than myself has someof the rights in the Property which I promise that I
have. 1 promise that I will defend my owner^ip of the Property against any claims ofsuch rights.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SECURITY INSTRUMENT
This Securi^ Insiniment contains promises and agreements that are used in real property securiQ* instruments
ail over the countiy. It also contains other promises and agreements that vary in dirieient parts of the country.
My promises and agreements ate stated in "plain language."
COVENANTS
1 promise and I agree with Lender as follows:
1. Borrower's Promise to Pay. I will pay to Lender on time principal and interest due under the Note
and any prepayment, late charges and other amounts doe under the Note. I will also pay aU amounts for
Escrow Items under Section 3 ofthis Securi^ Instrument.
Payments due under the Note and this Securi^ Instrument shall be made in U.S. cuiienqr. If ai^ of my
payments by check or other payment instrument is returned to Lender unpaid. Lender mav require my payment
be made by: (a)cash;(b) monQ'order;(c) certified check, bank check, treasurer's check or cashier's check,
drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instnimentalify, or entity; or (d)
Electronic Puiids Transfer.
Payments are deemed received by Lender when received at the location required in the Note, or at another
location designated by Lender under Section 15 ofthis Semirlty Insliument. Lender may return or accept any
paymoit or partial payment if It is for an amount that Is less than the amount that is then due. If Lender a lesser
payment, Lendermay refuse to aocept a lesser payment that I may make In the fUture and does not accepts
waiveai^ of its rights. Lender Is not obli^ted to apply such lesser payments when it accqtts such payments.
If interest on principal accrues as ifall Periodic Paymeflts bad been paid when due, then L^er need not pay
Interest on un^Ued fUnds. Lender may hold such nna(^lled fUnds until I make payments to bring the
current. IfI do not do so within a reasonable period oftime. Lender will either apply such ftiitds cx return
them to me. In the event of foreclosure, any unapplied funds will be applifri to the outstanding jnincipal
balance immediately prior to foreclosure. No ofDet or claim which 1 mi^t have now or in the future agaliut
Lender will relieve me from making payments due under the Note and this Security Instiuinent or keeping all
of my other promises and agreements secured by this Security Instrament.
2, Application of Borrower's Payments and Insoiance Proceeds. Unless Applicable Law or this
Section 2 requires othermse.Lender will apply each of my payments that Lender accepts In the following
order;
Firstt to pay inteiest due under the Mote;
TT An
amounts due for any Escrow Items for which payment ofPtuids lias been waived by Lender and, if Lender
requires, will promptly send to Lender receipts showing sudi payment within such time period as Lender may
require. My obligation to mahe such payments and to provide receipts will be considered to be a promise and
agreement contained in diis Security Instiument, as the pfarase "promises and agreements" Is used in Section 9
ofthis Security Insuument. Ifl am obligated to pay Es^w Items directly, poisoant to a waiver,and 1 fall to
pay the amount due for an Escrow Item,Lender may pay that amoum and I will then be obligated under Sectbn
9 of this Security Instniment to rqiay to Lender. Lender may revoke the waiver as to any or all Escrow Items
at any time 1^ a notice given in accordance with Section IS of this Security Instrument and, upon die
revocation,I will pay to Lender all Funds, and in amounts, that are then required under this Se^on 3.
I promise to promptly send to Lender any notices that I receive ofEscrow Item amounts to be paid. Lender
will eslimate from time to time the amount of Funds 1 will have to pay by using existing assessments and bills
and reasonable estimates ofthe amoum I will have to pay fbr Escrow Items in the ftilure, unless Applicable
Law requires Lender to use another method for determining the amount I am to pay.
Lender may, at any time,collect and hold Funds in an amount sufticlent to peroiit Lender to apply die
Funds at the time ^ledfied under RESPA. Applicable Law puts limits on the total amount of Foods ti^er can
at ai^ time colleci and ttold. This total amoum cannot be more than the maximum amount a lender could
require under RESPA. Iftheie is another Applicable Law that Imposes a lower limit on the total amoum of
Funds Lender can collect and bold, Lender be limited to the lower amoum.
(b) Lender's ObligBtfons, Lender will keep the Funds in a savings or banldng institution which has its
deposits insured by a federal agjency, instrumentality, or entity, or in any Federal Home Loan Bank. If Lender
is such a savings or banking institution, Lender may hold the Funds. Lender will use the Funds to pay the
Escrow Items no later than the time aliowed under RESPA or other Applicable Law. Lender will give to me,
without charge,an anmial accounting of the Funds. That accounting will show all additions to and deductions
hom the Funds and the reason for eadi d^uction.
Lender may not charge me for holding or keeping tite Fbnds, for using the Funds to pay Escrow Items,for
malting a yearly analysis of ipy i»yincm of Funds or for receiving, or for verifying and totaling assessments
and bills. However,Lender may diarge me for these services ifLender pays me interest on the FUnds and if
Applicable Law pennits Lender to make such a charge. Lender will not be required to p«v me any Interest or
earnings on the Funds unless either(1)Lender and I agree in writing that Lender wlU pay imeiest on the Funds,
or(2) Applicable Law requires Lender to pay Imerest on the Funds.
(c) Atilustmmits to the Ponds. Under Applicable Law,there Is a limit on the amount of Funds Lender
may bold. If the amount ofPUnds held by Lender excfeds this limit, dien there will be an excess amount and
RESPA requires Lender to aceoum to me in a special manner for the excess amount ofFunds.
If, at any lime. Lender has not received enough Funds to make the payments of Escrow Items when the
payments are due. Lender may tell me in writing that an additional amount is necessary. I will pay to Lender
whatever additional amount is necessary to pay the Escrow Items when the f»ymenis are due, Imi the number
of payments will not be more tiian 12.
TVhen I have paid all of the Sums Seoiied, Lender will promptly reiund to me any Funds that are then
beifig hdd by Lender.
4. Borrower's Obligation to Fay Charges, Assessments And Claims, I will pay all taxes, assessments,
water diarges,sewer rents and other similar ctoges,and any other charges and fines that may be Imptned on
the Property and that may be superior to this Secuil^ Insuument. I vdll also make ground rents or paymeiits
dttcundermy lease ifI am a tenant on the Propeity and Gommuni^ Association Dues, Pecs and Assessments
(if any)due on the Piopet^. If these items are B^ow Items, I vdll do this by making the payments as
described in Section 3 of this Security Instiument. In Ibis Security Instnimcnt, the word "person" means any
individual, orgaiuzation, governmental authority or other party.
OC nf An
The amount paid by the insurance company for loss or damage to the Property is called "proceeds.** Unless
Lender and I otherwise agree in writing, any proceeds, whether ornot the underlying insurance was required by
Lender, will be used to repair or to restore the damaged PxoperQr unless: (a) it is not economically feasible to
make the rq»irs or itttoration:(b)the use of the proceeds for that purpose would lessen the protection given
to Lender by this Security Instrument; or(c)Lender and 1 have agr^ In writing not to use the proceeds for
that purpose. During the period that aqy r^»its or festorations are being made. Lender may hold any proceeds
until it has had an oppoituuity to inspect die Property to verify that the iqnir work bu been completed to
Lender's satisfkction. However, this Inspection will be done promptly. Lender m^ make payments for the
rqsairs and restorations in a single payment or in a series of progress ptyments as the work is completed.
Unless Lender and I Bgiee otherwise in writiog or unless Applicable Law requires otherwise, Lender is not
required to pay me any interest or earnings on the proceeds. I will pay for any public adjusters or other third
parties that I hire, and thrir fises will not be paid out of the proceeds. If the repair or lestoiation is not
economically feasible or if U would lessen Lender's protection under this Security Instrument, then the proceeds
will be used to reduce the amount that I owe to Len^ under this Security Instrument. Such insurance proceeds
will be applied in the order provided for In Section 2. If any of the proceeds remain after the amount thatI owe
to Lender has been paid In fiiU, the remaining proceeds will be paid to me.
IfI abandon the Property, Lender may file, negotiate and settle any avaUaUe insurance claim and lelaled
matters. Ifldonotanswer, within 30 days, a nodce from Lender slating that the insurance company has
orieied to settle a clBim.Lmidermayn^otiate and settle the claim. The 30^1ay period will begin when the
notice is given. In either event, or if Lender acquires the Property under Section 22 of this Seeuritylnslnimsnl
or otherwise, I give Lender my rights to any insurance process in an amount not greater than the amounts
unpaid under the Note and this Security Instnimeot. I also give Lender any other of my rights (other than the
ri^t to any refund of uneamed premiums that I paid) under all insurance policies covering the Fiopeny, if the
rights are applicable to the coverage of the Prop^. Lender may use the insurance proceeds either to rq^ic or
restore the Property or to pay amoonts unpaid under the Note or diis Security lostniment, whedier or not then
due.
6. BoiTowm'*8 Obligations to Occupy The Property* I will occupy the Property and use the Property as
my principal residence wi&in60 days after I sign this Se^ty Instrument. I will cominue to occupy the
Property and to use the Property as nty principal residence for at least one year. The on&>year period will begin
when I first occuity the Property. However,I win not have to occupy the Property and use the Property as my
principal resident within the time frames set forth above if Lender agrees in writing that I do not have to do
so. Lender may not reftise to agree unless the refbsal is reasonable. 1 also will not have to occupy the Property
and use the Property as my principal residence within die time frames set forth above if extenuating
drcumsiances exist which are b^ond my control.
7. Borrower's Obligations to Maintain And Protect The Property And (o Fulflll Any Lease
Obligations.
(a) Maintenance and Protection of the Property. 1 will not destroy, damage or harm the Property, arul
I will not allow the Property to deteriorate. Whether or not I am residing in the Property, I will keep the
Property in good repair so that it will not deteriorate or decrease in value due to its oondition. Unless it is
detennlned under Seetion5 of this Security Instrument that repair is not economicaily feasible,1 will promptly
repair the Property if damaged to avoid ftiitber deterioration or damage. If Insurance or condemnation (as
described in the definition of Miscellaneous Proceeds) proceeds are paid because of less or damage to, or
condenmation of. the Property, 1 will repair or restore the Property only ifLender has released those proceeds
for such purposes. Lender may pay for the rqiairs and restoration out of proceeds In a single payroem or in a
series of progress payments as tlie work is completed. If the insurance or condemnation proceeds are not
sufficient to repair or restore(he Property, 1 promise to pay for the contyletion of such repair or restoration.
O'? r^■f Al
(b) Lender's Rights. Even If Lender does noi exercise or enforce any right of Lender under this Security
Instrument or under Applicable Law, Lender will sllll have all of those rights and may exercise and enforce
them In the future. Even if: (1)Lender obtains insurance, pi^s taxes, or pays other claims, diarges or liens
against the Proper^;(2)Leruler accepts payments from third persons; or (3) Lender acc^ payments in
amounts less than the amount then due. Lender will have the tigto under Section 22 below to demand that I
make immediate paymmit In fhll ofai^ amounts remaining due and payable to Lender under(be Note and under
(his Security Instrument.
13. Obligations of Borrower And of Persons Taking Over Borrower's Rights or Obllgatloas. If mote
than one person signs this Security Instrument as Borrower, each of us is ftilly obligated to keep all of
Borrower's promises and obligations contained in this Security InstmmenL Lender may enforce Lender's tights
under this SecutlQr Insiroment against each ofus Individually or against all of us together. This means that any
one of us may be required to pay all ofthe Sums Secured. However, ifone of as does not sign the Note: a)
that person is signing this Security Instrument only to ^ve that person's rights in the Property to Lender under
the terms of Ibis Security Instrument;(b)that person is not pernmally obligated to pay the Sums Secured; and
(c) that person agrees that Lendernuy agree with the odier Borrowers to delay enforcing any of Lender's
tights, to modify,or make any accommodations with regard to the terms of dils Security Instnimem or the Note
without(hat peiW's consent.
Subject to the provistons ofSection 18 ofibis Security Instrumenl, aiiy person who takes over my rights or
obligations under tills Security Imtrvment In writing, and is approved by Lender in writing, will have all of my
rights and will be obligated to keep all of my promises and agreements made in this Secnrity Instrament.
Borrower will not be released from Borrower's obligations and liabilities under Ibis Security Instrument unless
Lender agrees to such release in writing. Any person who takes over Lender's rights or obligations under this
Security Instrament will have all of Lender's rights and wUl be obligated to keep all of Lender's promises and
agreements made in this Security Instrument except as provided ui^er Section 20.
14. Loan Charges, Lender may charge me fees for services performed in connection with my defaoit, for
the purpose of protecting Lender's interest in tiie Property and rights under this Security Instrument, Including,
but not limited to, attorneys' fees, property inspection and valuation fees. With regard to other fees, the fact
that (his Security Insiniment does not expressly indicate that Lender may charge a certain fee does not mean that
Lender cannot charge that fee. Lender may not charge fees that are prohibited by this Security Instrument or by
Applicable Law.
If the Loan is subject to Applicable Law which sets maximum loan diaxges, and that Applicable Law is
finally interpreted so that the interest or other loan charges collected or to be collected in coimection with the
Loan exceed permitted limits: (a)any such loan charge will be reduced by the amount necessary to reduce (he
charge to the permitted limit: and(b)any sums already collected from me which exceeded permitted limits will
be refiinded to me. Lender may dtoose to make this teiund by reducing the principal owed under the Note or
by making a direct payment to Borrower. If a refund reduces principal, the reduction will be treated as a partial
prepayment without any prepayment charge (even ifa prqi^mentcharge is provided for under the Note). If I
accept such a refund that is paid directly to me,1 will waive any right to bring a lawsuit against Lender because
of the overcharge.
15. Notices Required under this Security Instrttment. All notices given by me or Lender in connection
with this Seciuity Instrument will be in writing. Any notice to me in connection with this Security Imtrument
is considered given to me when mailed by first class mail or when actually delivered to nqr notice address if
sent by other means. Notice to any one Borrower will be notice to all Borrowers unless Applicable Law
expressly requites otherwise. The notice address is the address ofthe Proper^ unless I give imtice to Lender
of a dlfTerent address. I will promptly notify Lender of my change of address. If Lender specifies a procedure
fbr reporting my change of address, then I will only report a change of address through (hat verified
OQ /^^= At
worlc has been completed to Lender's satbfaction. Howevcfi the inspection will be undeitalccn promptly.
Lender may pay for the lepatts and restoration in a single dlsbtirsemeni or In a series of progress payments as
the work is completed. Unless Lender and I agree otherwise in writing or unless Applicable Law requires
interest to be paid on such Miredlaneous Proceeds, Lender will not be required to pay Borrower any interest or
earnings on the Miscellaneous Proceeds. If the restoration or repair is not economicaliy feasible or Lender's
security given in this Security Instrument would be lessened, the Mlscdlanams Prm^eeds be applied to the
Sums Secured, whedier or not then due. The excess, if any, will be paid to me. Such Miscellaneous Proceeds
will be applied in the order provided for In Section 2.
In the event ofa total taking, destruction, or loss in value of the Properq^, the Miscellaneous Proceeds will
be applied to the Sums Secured, vdiedier or not then due. Tire excess, if any, will be paid to me.
In the event of a partial taking, desuuctton, or loss In value of the Profpei^ in which the folr matter value
of the Property immediately before the partial t^ing, destruction, or loss in value is equal to or greater than
the amount of(he Sums Secured immefiately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss In value, the Sums
Secured will be reduced by the amount ofthe Miscellaneous Proceeds mult^lied by the following h^tioiu (a)
the total amount of the Sums Secured immediately before the imrtial tal^, destruction, or loss in value
divided by(b)the foir market value ofthe Property immediately before(he p^al taking, destruction, or loss
in value. Ai^ balance shall be paid tome.
In the event of a partial taking, destruction, or loss in value of the PRqrerQr in which the foir market value
of the Property Immediately before the partial t^ng,destruction, or loss in value is less than the amount of
(he Sums Secured hnmnBately before the partial taking, destruction, or loss in value, the Miscdlaneous
Proceeds wSl be applied to tire Sums Secured whether or not the sums are then due.
If I abandon the Property, or if, after Lender sends me notice that the Opposing Party (as defined in the
next sentence)offered to make an award to settle a claim for damages. I foil to respond to Lender within 30
d^ after the date tte Lender gives notice, Lender is authorize to collect and apply the Miscdlaneous
Proceeds either to restoration or repair of the Property or to the Sums Secured, whether or not then due.
"Opposing Party" means the third party that owes me Miscellaneous Proceeds or the party against whom 1 have
a ngbt of action in regard to Miscellaneous Proceeds.
I will be in default under this Securi^ Instrument ifany civil or criminal action or proceeding that Lender
determines could result In a court ruling(a)(bat would require forfeiture of the Property, or fo)that could
damage Lender's intoest in the Prqretty or rights under this Secun^ Instrument. "Forfdtore" is a court action
to require the Property, or any part ofthe Proner^, to be given up. I may correct the default by obt^nlng a
court Piling that disnih^ the court action, ifLmder determines that this court ruling prevents forfeiture of
the Proper^ and also prevents any damage to Lender's interest in the Property or H^ts under (hb Security
Instniment. If1 correct tire defoult, I wiU have the right to have enforcement of this Securiqr Instrument
dlscondnued, as provided in Section 19 of this Security Instrument, even if Lender has required immediate
payment in full. The proceeds of any award or claim for damages (hat are attributable to the damage or
reduction of Lender's Interest in the Property are assigned, and will be paid, to Lender.
All MisceUaneous Proceeds that are not applied to restoration or repair of the Property will be applied In
(he ocdtn- provided for in Section 2.
T1 A1
procedure. There may be only one designated notice address under this Security Instnunent at any one time.
Any notice to Lender will be given by delivering it or by mailing it by first class mail to Lender's address
Slated on the first page of ibis Securi^ Instrument unless Lenderhas given me notice of another address. Any
notice in connection wilb this Security Instrument is given to Lender when it is actually received by Lender. If
any notice requited by this Security bistrument is also required under An>Ucable Law, the Applicable Law
requirement will satisty the cone^ondlng requirement under this Security TpBtn'mt^nt.
16* Law That Governs this Security Instrument} Word Usage* This Security Instrument is governed by
federal law and the law of New York State. All rights and obligations contained In this Security Instrument are
subject to any requirements and limitations of Applicable Law. Applicable Law might allow the parties to
agreeby contract or it might be silent, but such silence does not mean that Lender and I cannot agree by
contract. Ifany term of this Security Instrument or of the Note conflicis with Applicable Law, the conflict will
not affect other provisions of this Security Instrument or the Note which can opeiate, or be given efiecl,
without the conflicting provision. This means that the Security Instrument or the Note will remain as if dte
conflicting provision did not exist.
As used In this Security Instrument: (a)words of the masculine gender mean and include corresponding
words of the feminine and neuter genders}(b)words in the singular mean and include the plural, and words in
the plural mean and include the singular; a^(c)the word "may" gives sole discretion without any obligation to
take any action.
17. Borrower's Copy. I will be given one copy ofthe Note and ofthis Security Insiniment.
18* Agreemenfs about Lender's Rights If the Property Is Sold or TVansferred. Lender may require
immediate payment in full of all Sums Secured by this Security lostrument if all or any part of the I^peity, or
if any right in the Property, is sold or transferred without Looider's prior written permission. If Borrower b
not a natural person and a beneficiai interest in Borrower is sold or tiansfeiml without Lender's prior written
permission. Lender also may require inunedmte payment in full. However,(his option not te exercised
by Lender if such exercise is prc^ibitcd by Applicable Law.
If Lender reqidres immediate payment in liili under this Section 18, Lender will give roe a notice wbidi
slates(his requirement. The notice will give me at least 30 days to make the required payn^t. The 30>day
period will begin on the date(he notice is given tome in(te manner reqpilred by Section 15 of (his Security
Instniment. IfI do not make the required payment during that period, Lender may act to enforce its rights
under this Security Instrument without giving me any fuithei iKXice or demand for pstynient.
19. Borrawer's Right to Have Lender's Enforcement ofthis Security Instrument Olscontianed. Even
if Lender has required immediate payment In full, I may have the right to have enforcement of this Security
Instrument stopj^. I wHl have this li^i at any time before the earliest of: (a) 5 days before ^e of the
Property under aqy power of sate granted by this Security Instrument; &) another period as Applicable Law
mlg^t specity for the termination of my right to have enforcement of the Loan stopp^; or (e) a judgment has
been entered enforcing this Security Instrument. In order to have this right, I will meet the following
conditions:
(a) I pay to Lender the full amount that(hen would be due under this Security Instrument and (he Note as
If immediate payment in fiill had never been required;
(b) I correct my failure to keep any of my other promises or agreements made in diis Security Instrument;
(c) I pay all of Lender's reasonable expenses in enfondng this Security Instiument including, for exanqile,
reasonable attorneys'fees, property inspection and valaalton fees, and other fiees incurred for the purpose of
protecting Lender's interest in the Property and rights under this Security Instrument; and
(d) Ido whatever Lender reasonably requires to assure that Lender's interest In the Property and tights
under this Security Instrument and my obligations under the Note and under this Security Instrument
unchanged.
LOANNOalH InlUab A U
NEW YORK-SiitglfiFaro&y-FhnnleMae/IVeddlB Mac UNIFORMINSTRUMENT-MERS Fonn3033 1/Dl
Docnu^SetncexIitc roxM.MMTONVMui PegoUori?
ORIGINAL
NON-UNIFORM COVENANTS
22. tendons Rights If Borrower Falls to Keep Promises and Agreemaits. Except as provided in
Section 18 of this Security Instrument,if all of the conditions stated fa subsections(a),(b)and (c) of this
Section 22 are met, Lender may require that I pay immediately the entire amount then remaining unpaid
undo* the Note and under this Security Instrument. Lender may do this without making any furthor
demand for paymmt. This requirement Is called "Immediate payment In fbll."
If Lender requires immetUate paymentin(toll, Lender may bring a lawsuit to take away all of my
ranainlng rights in the Property and have the Property sold. At(his sale Lendo'or another person may
acquire the Property, This is known as "foreclosure and sale." In any lawsuit for foreelosnre and sale>
Lender will have the r^t to collect all costs and disbuisements and additional allowances allowed by
Applicable Law and will have the right to add all reasonable attorneys' fees to the amount1 owe Lenda-,
which fees shall become part of tire Sums Secured or if anoth^ default occum und» this Security
Inslnimoit.
*Leadcr may require Immediate payment in iUU under this Section 22 only if all of the following
conditions are met:
(a) I fail to ke^ any promise or agreement made In this Security Instniment or the Note, including,
but not limited to,the promises to pay when due the Sums Secured or If another default occurs under(hfe
Security Instrument:
(b) Lender sends to me,in the manner described in Section IS of this Security Instrument, a notice
that states:
(1) The promise or agreement that 1 failed to keep or the default that has ecoirred;
(2) The action teat I must take to correct that default;
(3) A date by which I most correct(he default. That date will be at least 30 days from the date
on which the notice Is given;
■ac r\^ hi
INITIAL INTEREST'^ ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER
(1-Year LIBOR Index - Rate Caps)
(Assomable after lalUal Period)
THIS INITIAL INTEREST ADJUSTABLE RATE RIDER is made thb UTH day of
DECBMBER . 2005 .and is incorporated into and fihflU be deemed to amend and supplement
the Mortgage, Deed ofTnist, or Security Deed (the "Security Inslnunent") of the same date givmi by the
undersigned (the "Borrower")to secure the Borrower's Initial Interest Ad)t>stable Rate Note (the "Note") to
FAIRMONT FUNDING LTD.A NEW YORK CORPORATION
(the "Lender")Ofthe same date and covering the property described in the Security Instrument and located at:
4221 ATLA1OT1C AVENUE [
BROOKLYN.NEW YORK 11224
(Property Address)
the NOTE CONTAINS PROVISIONS ALLOWING FOR CHANGES IN THE INTEREST
RATE AND THE MONTHLY PAYMENT. THE NOTE LIMITS THE AMOUNT THE
BORROWER'S INTERECT RATE CAN CHANGE AT ANY ONE TIME AND THE
MAXIMUM RATE THE BORROWER MUST PAY.
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS. In addition to the covenants and agreements made in the Security
Instnunenl. Borrower and Lender farther covenant and agree as follows:
ORIGINAL
"SI An
2. AFTER BORROWER'S INITIAL INTEREST RATE CHANGES UNDER THE TERMS
STATED IN SECTION A ABOVE,UNIFORM COVENANT 18 OF THE SECURTTY INSTRUMENT
DESCRIBED IN SECTION B1 ABOVE SHALL THEN CEASE TO BE IN EFFECT, AND THE
PROVISIONS OF UNIFORM COVENANT 1ft OF THE SECURITY INSTRUMENT SHALL BE
AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
TVansfer of the Pmperty or a Be&eflcial Interest In Borrower. As used in this Section 18,
"Interest in the Property" means any legal or heneficial interest in the Property, including, but not
limited to, those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed,contract for deed, installment sales
contract or escrow agreement, the intent of which is the transfer of title by Borrower at a future date to
a purchaser.
Ifall or any part of the Proper^ or any Interest in the Property is sold or transfened (or if
Boirovwr is not a natural person and a beneficial interest in Borrower Is sold or transfened) without
Lender's prior written consent, Lender may require imnffidlate payment in fidl ofall sums secured by
this Security Instrument. However, this i^tion shall not be exercised by Lender if such exercise is
prohibited by Applicable Law. Lender also Shall not exercise this option if: (a)Borrower causes to be
submitted to Lender infoimatlon required by Lender to evaluate the Inteitded transferee as If a new loan
were being made to the transferee;^fir)Lender reasonably determines that Lender's security will not
be inqiaired by the loan assunq)tion and that the risk ofa breach ofany covenant or agreement in this
Security Instrumem Is acceptable to Lender.
To tbe extent permitted by Applicable Law, Lender may charge a reasonable fee as a condition to
Lender's consent to the loan assumption. Lender m^ also require the transferee to sign an assumption
agreement ttiat is acceptable to Lender and that obligates the transferee (o keep all the prondses and
agreements made in the Note and In this Security Instniment. Borrower will continue to be obiigated
untler the Note and this Securi^ Instiumcot unless Lender releases Borrower in writing.
IfLender exercises the option to require immediate payment in full. Lender shall give Borrower
notice of acceleration. Tbe notice shall provide a period of not less than 30 days fiom the date the
notice is given in accordance with Section 15 within which Borrower must pay all sums secured by this
Security Instrument. If Bonower fails to pay these sums prior to(he expiration of this period. Lender
may invoice any remedies permiucd by this Securi^ Instrument without further notice or demand on
Borrower.
BY SIGNING BELOW, Borrower accepts and agrees to the temis and covenants contained in this
Adjustable Rate Rider.
^(Seal) (Seal)
•Borrower •Borrower
MlCnAEL XRICHEVSKY
^(Seal) ^(Scal)
-Borrower -Bonower
LOAN NO.;
MUi«TISVA'i'j£ INITIAL INTBRSST AIU1ISTABL1S RATB RIDER • l.ytar LIBOR Lsdox(Anomablo sntr loUtel Phrtod).SlAgb Pmlly.
nrtMliMac VNtFORM tNSTRCMEMT
DoenwSanaailKe. i«BM*Maiunc«us Page 3of3 Ponn5137 7/QS
ORIGINAL
•ao A >7
NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY REGISTER
PROPERTY DATA
Borough Block Lot Unit Address
BROOKLYN 7026 53 Entire Lot 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
Property Type: DWELLING ONLY -1 FAMILY
PARTIES
ASSIGNOR/OLD LENDER: ASSIGNEE/NEW LENDER:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
SYSITFMS TNC 180 EAST 5TH STREET
3300SW 34TH AVENUE.SUITE 101 ST PAUL. MN 55101
OCALA,FL 34474
X Additional Parties Listed on Continuation Page
FEES AN D TAXES
Mortgage Filing Fee:
Mortgane Amount: o.co $ 0.00
Taxable Mortgage Amount: 0.00 NYC Real Property Transfer Tax:
Exemption: $ 0.00
TAXES: County(Basic): 0.00 NYS Real Estate Transfer Tax:
CitvfAdditionan: 0.00 S 0.00
Spec(Additional^; 0.00 RECORDED OR FILED IN THE OFFICE
TASF: 0.00 OF THE CITY REGISTER OF THE
MTA: 0.00 CITY OF NEW YORK
NYCTA: 0.00 Reconied/FUed 10-19-200915:47
Additional MRT; 0.G0 City RegisterFile No.(CRFN):
TOTAL: 0.00 2009000339958
Recording Fee: 42.00
Affldavit Fee: 0.00
A1 »->■?
Lotm M
ASSIGNMENT OFMORTGAGE
Assignor; IVlortg»gc Eluclronic RegisirnUon Systems, Inc. ns nominee for Fairmont Funding, Ud., its successors and
assigns,3300SW 34(h Ave.Suite 101, Ocala, PL 34474
Assignee; US Bank Nalioiial Association,as Trustee for Mortgage Pnss<Through Certificates,Series 2006*F. 180 East 5ih
St...St. Paul. MN 55101
Original Uiiden Mortgage Electronic Registnitiun Systems, Inc. as nominee for Fairmont Funding. Ltd., its successors
and assigns
Mortgage made by MICHAEL KRICHEVSKV.dated the I4(h day of December, 2005 in the amount of.Seven hundred and
forty seven thousand six hundred dollars ($747,600.00) and interest, recorded on the 21st day of December, 2005 in the
OfTlce oftitc Clerk ofthe County of KINGS at Ccrtlficnie/Docket Number 2005000701375.
Know that All Men By Tbe.se Present in coiMiderution of the sum of One and Na'tOOth Dollars and otiier good valuable
consideruiton. paid to the above Named assignor, the receipt and sufficiency of which is Itereby acknowledged the Said Assignor
hereby fl.ssigiis unlu the above named Assignee the said Mortgage, and tite full benefit ofall the powers and of nil the covenants
und Provi.si(<ns therein contained, and the said Assignor hereby grants and convcws unto the said Assignee, the Assignoi's
henelicial interest under the Mortgage.
TO HAV'E.\i\'D TO HOLO the ssiid Moilgagc. and also the snid property unto the said Assignee forever, subject lu ilic terms
ctmtamed to said M«>iigage.
n/fdT Assignment is not subjea to the requiremom ofSection 275 of the Real Property Law because it is wiilun the secondary
mortgage mtirket.
/.Y W1TSESS wmiHHOT', lite A.s.signor has causal liiesc presents to be signed by its duly miiliorized olllccr this 2.^ih day of
August. 2{)t)0.
tyPRtSEM'EO/-
BY:
Elpiniki M. Dechakas
Assisiam Secretary ;nd Vice Prc.sidciii
.State of New York
Countyofl-ric .s>;
On the 25iii day of August in the year200*r heliuv mc. lite undersigned, a notary public in and for snid state, personally
appeared Idpiniki M. Hecliakas. persottally known to tnc or proved to me on the basis ofsatisfactory evidence to be lite
individitalis) whose n»me(s)is(»rel subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me thai he shc'tliey e.sccuied
the same in hi&-her lheir capacity(ies). and that by liisdter/tlieir slguaiure(s) on the instrument, the individuuKs}or (tie petison
upon hehalfof wiitch the individual(.s) acia). c.\ceuled the instrumem.
oiffrx' Public
A"* r\f An
NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY REGISTER
2013090400289001001CCFA6
RECORDING AND ENDORSEMENT COVER PAGE (CONTINUATIONS PAGE 2 OF4
Document ID: 2013090400289001 Document Date:08-29-2013 Preparation Date: 09-04-2013
Document Type: ASSIGNMENT,MORTGAGE
AK nKf! At
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE PAGE 2 OF 2
STATE OF Minnosota
COUNTY OF Dakota
An Al
IFILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/18/2016 01;37"~Pia INDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/18/2016
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF MERIT
PURSUANT TO CPLR
3012-b
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE INTERNAL MORTGAGED PREMISES:
4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a
REVENUE SERVICE,CITY OF NEW YORK
4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU,
and JOHN DOE, Brooklyn, NY 11224
Defendants,
1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of New York, and am affiliated
with the law firm of Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP,attorney for plaintiff U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee for Banc of America Funding Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2006-F in this action.
2. I am unable to confirm whether this residential foreclosure action involves a home loan, as such
term is defined in Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law §1304,as I am presently unable to
confirm that the defendants Michael Krichevsky is a resident of the property subject to
foreclosure.
3. I have reviewed the facts ofthis case and reviewed pertinent documents, including the mortgage,
security agreement and note or bond underlying the mortgage executed by defendant, all
instruments ofassignment(if any), and all other instruments of indebtedness including any
modification, extension, and consolidation.
4. On April 6,20161 consulted about the facts of this case with the following representatives of
plaintiff:
Name Title
Daniel V.Edward Vice President of Loan Documentation
Upon this review and consultation, to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, I certify
that there is a reasonable basis for the commencement of this action, and that plaintiff is the
creditor entitled to enforce rights under these documents.
{3911350:}
1 of 2
6. Listed in Exhibit A and attached hereto are copies ofthe following documents not otherwise
included as attachments to the summons and complaint: the mortgage; all instruments of
assignment(if any); and any other instrument ofindebtedness, including any modification,
extension, and consolidation (Check box if no documents are attached in Exhibit A;[].)
7. [IF APPLICABLE - Listed In Exhibit B and attached hereto are supplemental affidavits attesting
that certain documents as described in paragraph 5 supra are lost, whether by destruction, thefl,
or otherwise.(Check box if no documents are attached in Exhibit B:[X].)]
8. I am aware of my obligations under New York Rules ofProfessional Conduct(22 NYCRR Part
1200)and 22 NYCRR Part 130.
Dated: April^,2016
{3911350;}
2 of 2
EXHIBIT C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MOR TGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES. SERIES 2006F. VERIFIED ANSWER TO
PlainiilT. UNDATED
FORECLOSURE
-against- COMPLAINT,
COUNTERCLAIMS,
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,et ai. DEMAND FOR TRIAL
Delendants. BY JURY
COUNSELORS;"Our courts should not be collection agencies for crooks." — John Waihce,
TAKE JUDICIALNOTICE: that 1. Michael Krichevsky, am alive, private man, who is one of the people
of New York. I am domiciled in the material world to wit: geographic area of former Dutch colony
currently known as New York Republic. The change from colony to republic occurred during creation and
signing of Constitution for the united states ol'America. Man. Michael Krichevsky. therefore stands on the
common law custom and usage jurisdiction ol'people domiciled in this geographic area. THFZ STATE OF
NEW YORK is fictitious entity, creation of mind, known as corporation. Alive man, Michel Krichevsky,
is not corporation or 'Juristic person'; Michael Krichevsky is not a shareholder, agent or employee ofsaid
corporation; Michael Krichevsky did not knowingly contract with said corporation; Michael Krichevsky
is not a property ofthis corporation. As such, no nexus beivvecn corporation and man exists. Therefore, it
is axiomatic that man. Michael Krichevsky.cannot be a resident of.such fiction and anyone claiming to the
contraiy is incompetent or trying to perpetrate the fraud upon the court in procuring jurisdiction of THE
I, Michael Krichevsky, sui juris. Falsely Accused Ciaimani ([■'alsely Accused) hereby rebut 12
presumptions ol'this court, which 1 believe will operate as Roman Municipal Court.
1 give credit to attorney Meivin Stamper. .ID. who publicly disclosed and related the following information
frojii the book "Fniit from a Poisonous Tree "(available at Amazon, page 58):
"The scheme also providedfor the conirol of the eoiirls via the 1913 creation of the American Bar
Association, whose parent organization u t/.v the European International Bar Association, which was the
creation of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice of law. in that the
only ones permitted to practice before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of law,
which was only Admiralty and Contract law. ( 'ommon law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the
natural man many jurisdictional protections from the bankers' legislation. "
I give credit to Anlicorniption Society and Cannon Law researcher Frank O'Collins (one-heaven.orti).
who ferreted out these presumptions and helped make them a\ ailablc to the general population. They,
also, pointed out that our so-called *courts" arc run by a private guild b\ the name of the British
Canon 3228
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law. but by presumptions of the law.
Therefore, if presumptions presented by the pri\ ate Bar Ciuikl arc not rebutted they become laci and are
therefore said to stand true fOr as "truth in commerce"]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted
by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record. Public Service. Public
1. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a
inaUcr for llic public record when in fad il is presumed by the members ol'llic private Bar Guild that the
matter is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the
matter is to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under
2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all
sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Ciiiild then act as public agents ofthe Government, or "public
oH'tcials" by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private
"superior" oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim .stands that these
private Bar Guild members arc legitimate public serv'unts and therefore trustees under public oath; and
3. The Presumption ofPublic Oath is that all members ofthe Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity
of"ptiblic officials" who have sworn a .solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound
to serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and
demanded, the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public
oath in contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged,such individuals must recuse themselves as having
a conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath: and
4. The Presumption of Immunity is that kes members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of
"public officials" acting asjudges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in
good faith are immune from personal claims ol injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their
oath demanded,the presumption stands that the members ofthe Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting
as judges, prosecutors and magistrates arc immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
5. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebuttcd stands and therefore one
who attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant,juror, witness)and jurisdiction of the
court. Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless tlie summons is rejected and returned,
with a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend,jurisdiction and position as the
6. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebuttcd stands
and therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therelbre liable to be detained in
custody by "Custodians".[This includes the dead legal fiction non-human "PTRSON" that
corporate-governments rules and regulations arc written for.*] Custodians may only lawfully hold custody
of property and "things" not fiesh and blood soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly
challenged by rejection ofsummons and/or at court, the presumption stands you are a thing and properly
7. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a
"resident" of a ward ofa local government area and have listed on s our "passport" the letter P. you are a
pauper and therefore under the "Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of
Guardians". Unless this presumption is opcnK challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian
and general executor ofthe matter(trust) before the court,the presumption stands and you are by default a
pauper, and lunatic and therefore must obe\ the rules ofthe clerk ofguardians(clerk of magistrates court);
8. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members olThe Private Bar Guild presume you
accept the office of trustee as a "public serv ant" and "government employee"just by attending a Roman
Court, as such. Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System.
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to state you are merelv visiting by "invitation" to clear up
the matter and you are not a government employ ee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption
stands and is assumed as one olThe most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction -simply because you
"appeared": and
9. The Presumption of Government acting in t>vo roles as Executor and Bencfician' is that for the
mailer at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoints the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the
Prosecutor acts in the capacity of BeneJlciary ofthe trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption is
openly challenged to demonstrate you arc both a general guardian and general executor of the matter
(trust) before the court,the presumption stands and you arc by default the trustee, therefore must obey the
10. The Presumption of Executor Dc Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does .seek to
assert their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they arc acting as an Executor
De Son Tort or a "false executor" challenging the "rightful" judge as Executor. Therefore, the
judge/magistrate assumes the role of"true" executor and has the rigiu to have you arrested,detained,fined
or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only asserting
one's position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as Executor
De Son fort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek to
11. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at lea.st ignorant of the law,
therefore incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor
has the right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and
actively rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you arc
incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
12. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business
meeting of the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty".
Therefore unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with
extreme prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you ai-e guilty and the
pri\ aic liar Guild can hold you uniil a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit
IVom you.
As I am aware of these presumptions. I do not consent to them antl declare that I am not a debtor
(sinner)or surety in this action. 1 am, rather, creditor and real party in interest who "injured in fact." I
object and challenge these presumptioits. I demand I) a court reporter and a Court of Public Record; 2)a
copy of Oath of Office from judge Noah Dear as Public Serv ant and Trusiee of Public Tnisi. who is being
paid by the Public. 1 demand an explanation ofJudge Noah Dears authority over my property and me.sui
juris who does not consent(contract) to these kangaroo court proceedings ~~ as "two cannot walk together
unless they agree.'* This rebuttal is peremptory challenge to Judge Dear whether he is sworn to the BAR
first and foremost. Will judge Dear act in capacity of'tPublic Official," who have sworn a solemn public
oath, and remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to serve honestly, impaniality and fairly as
dictated by their oath? As such, ifjudge Dear injures me. he would not be immune from personal liability.
I am returning summons,do not accept the position of defendant and presumption ofguilt, and attend
under duress in self-defense from criminal acts of plaintiff and its attorneys. .As alive man, sui juris, 1 am
not a thing, slave orjuristic person in anybody's cu.stody or control. I am not under presumed authority of
1 do not accept the office oftrustee as a "public servant" and "government employee"just by attending
this Roman Coun. I am merely visiting by "im iiation" to clear up the matter of criminal fraud. As such. I
Judge Dear is not an Executor appointed by the Bar while plaintiffs attorneys are beneficiaries of the
trust in this matter. In fact, as sui juris, I am the general guardian and executor of my property in this
Is judge Dear seeking to act as Executor Dc Son Tort in that matter? As a private man.sui juris, I have
all ol'iny Clod given natural rights and authorit\ to be a steward ol'the land.
Judge Dear is not custodian and I am not a thing or subject. Furthermore, as private man. sui juris. 1 am
competent and over the age oFmajority. I am not trustee in this matter, but a victim ofpublic corruption by
Once again, 1 declare that as sui Juris 1 am competent in law to delend myself in lawful, constitutional
common law court of record and reject presumptions that this is going to be BAR's "private lynching" of
guilty slave.
For my Verified Answer Under Dure.ss to the Unverified. Undated Complaint, 1 move all court officers
to perfomi their fiduciaty duty to Public and me. and set common law jurisdiction to uphold my God given
I. Michael Krichevsky. move this court to take judicial notice if my sui juris status. Due to the breach of
peace, harassment and fraudulent,simulated process .started by plaintiffand its attorneys,as officers ofthe
court, it does not look like this court is set to operate at law or in equity. I object, notify presiding judge of
criminal conduct of unidentified plaintiifand its attorney again.st me. 1 aver in self-defense, without
prejudice and without waiving any rights to expose these corruption and crime. 1 aver Under Duress,
without voluntarily submitting to fictitious, corporate jurisdiction of this court called New York Unified
Court System. I am cautious and presume that this system is set to act as kangaroo court using 12
presumptions of court to violate all of my rights in favor of plaintiffand its attorney. I aver, in the court of
record, without waiving any of my natural or other rights and rules as follows;
1, I rebut every presumption (disclosed and undisclosed). I generally deny each allegation contained in
paragraph numbered 1.2. 3.4.5.6. 7. 8. 10. l.>. 14.15. 18. 21. 22. and 23 ofthe Complaint,including that
Plaintiff is the owner and holder of the subject mortgage and note, or has been delegated the authority to
inslilule a niorigage foreclosure action by ilic owner and holder ofthe subject mortgage and note. I notice
the Public Court that Plaintiffs attorney never pleaded ihc term in due course.' which makes the action
2. Moreover. II 1 is the suspect to me for fraud. In prior litigation attorney for Plaintiff refused to identify
the true name and nature ofthe Plaintiff with similar name and Hied motion to discontinue prior action in
order to prevent discovery or disclosure ol'ils identity: and prevent me from trial by jury to dismifis prior
action with prejudice for lack of standing. Dismissal with prejudice is resolution of controversy on the
merits. As such, plaintiff is estopped from bringing any action again.st me..4s such, this action is frivolous
3. I specifically deny statement in paragraph 2. that I "reside" at my property because such term is not
clearly defined and to my knowledge is deceiving as one ofthe elements offictitious jurisdiction.
4. 1 partially admit and partially deny paragraph 18, to wit: 1 claim to have interest in and lien upon the real
properly that 1 own and nobody has a lien or interest superior to mine.
5. 1 lack infonnation and knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained
in paragraphs numbered 1 L 12.16. 17. 19.21. and 24 of the Complaint. As such. 1 demand strict proof.
6. In addition, in this complaint. Plaintiffs attorney changed and Plaintiffs address withheld, which facts
1 treat as deceitful.
7. There is no man or woman making a verified claim in this action, cwcept myself
9. Accordingly, Falsely Accused demands identification ofthe Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION
investigation, that this is a fake, fictitious flaintilT. Upon information and belief, 1 aver that plaintiff is a
10. Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the falsely Accused. Per NY Civil Practice Law and Rules §
308.1 was not properly served with process in this action for the following reasons: a)a copy ofSummons
and Complaint were not handed to me in person, b)a copy ofSummons and Complaint were not left at my
home with a "person of suitable age and discretion." c)a copy of Summons and Complaint were not
attached to my liomc door, with another copy mailed within 20 days to my home. The process server never
saw and asked me whether 1 was in the military service and what my name was. In addition, due to the
unfinished construction of my hou.se. there was no building number anywhere posted and 1 question how
he found me.
11. The attorney for plaintitT. Victoria li, Munian, Esq., made the following false and/or contradictory
"1. 1 am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of New York,and am
affiliated with the law firm of Wood.s Oviatt Oilman LLP. attorney for plaintitT U.S. Bank
National A.ssociation. as Trustee for Banc of America Funding Corporation Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2()06-F in this action.
2. 1 am unable to confirm whether this residential forecio.surc action involves a home loan,
as such term is defined in Real Property .Actions and Proceedings l^w § 1304. as I am
pre.sently unable to confirm that the defendants Michael Krichevsky is a resident of
the property subject to foreclosure"[emphasis mine]
12. .Affidavit of service states that server personally served me at subject properly address and that I have
identified myselfto process server. thereb>^ creating presumption that 1 am a resident of property subject to
13. As such. Traverse hearing is required to determine whether Atlome\'s statement that she is "unable to
confirm that the defendants Michael Krichevsk\ is a resident of the property .subject to foreclosure" or
arndas ii ofsen icc is false. Personal!). 1 believe ihai atiomey hersell'is aware thai proper service was not
performed, hence her statement in 1' 2 that she is "unable to conllrm that the defendants Michael
14. /Mternatively, Victoria E. Munian. Esq.. believed the process server's affidavit, but made this
statement to avoid compliance with Real Properly Actions and Proceedings Law § L5()4 and other
applicable law to mislead the court and take advantage over me. In that case. Victoria E. Munian, Esq.
committed attorney misconduct and should be sanctioned, while her complaint dismissed with prejudice,
15. Regardless of the outcome of fravers hearing, both material facts in .said affidavit ofservice and
certificate of merit contradict each other and one of them is false, and therefore fraudulent. According to
maxim oflaw."fraud vitiates all", either affidavit of service is perjury and must be stricken from the
court's record and .ser\'icc of process quashed, or certificate of merit is perjuiy and must be stricken from
16. That this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the issues rai.sed herein because Plaintiff, inter
alia, suffered no damages(there will be more explanation below) atid as such, no controversy exists. In
17. Plaintiff does not claim damages according to the instant complaint, and therefore it wants my house
18. The only real parly in interest in this matter with "injury in fact" is I as one people, who bailed out
banking industry in 2008 to the tune of 280 billion dollars tor its corruption.
AS AND FOR A THIRD AFF1RMA4IVE DI-FENSE - Illcaal action. Violation of NY State Penal Code.
21. Law prohibits plaintiff to enforce the law by violating another law.
22. All Plaintiffs' attorneys violated and continue violate ethics, disciplinary rules and judiciary Law
§487. which is a crime,and therefore prior and this actions are illegal.
2.'>. 1 am harassed and compelled by plainiiirs attorney into expenses, laboring and defending my rights
without knowing what I did wrong. Who or what "U.S. B.'\NK N.ATIOKAL .ASSOCIATION..AS
CERTIFICA FES. SERIES 2006F" is as named plaintiff on the caption of this complaint? This plaintilTs
name is gibberi.sh called "DOG-LA'l lN: The 1 .aiin of illiterate persons; Latin words put together on the
Enulish lirammaiical system"-- Black s Law Dictionary 4''' Edition {page 569). it is an old trick knovvm to
our Founding Fathers. From letter of Thomas Jefferson to John Adams:
"I had supposed them defunct with the .society of Jesuits, of which they were: and that
their works, although above ground, were, from their bulk and insignificance, as
effectually entombed on their shelves, as if in the graves of their authors. Fifty-two
volumes in I'olio. of the acta .sanctorum, in dog-Latin, would be a tbrmidable enterprise to
the mo.st laborious German."
24. Plaintiffs name is also a "GLO.SS.A VIPERINA EST QUIT: CORRODIT VlSCERATEX'fUS. 11
Coke. 34. It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence of the text. - Black s Law Dictionary 4'''
Edition (page 820). It looks just like English, but grammatically is wrong, upper ca.se styled Dog-Latin -
foreign text.
25. The way I learned Engli.sh. is that after 'coma" goes another name on the caption ofthe form. Here is
how I see it:
26. First plaintiffs name is U.S. B.ANK NA TIONAL ASSOCTATIGN.The .second plaintiffs name is AS
TRUSTEE FOR BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES. The third plaintilTs name is SliRIES 2006F..According to English grammar rule, there
are three plaintiffs on the caption of this action.
27. .'Vccordingls. plaintilTdoes not and cannot lawfully e.\ist as one {I) fiction of law such as corporation
or trust. Attorneys in prior and in this actions committed perjuiy by. inter alia, staling in prior and in
itistanl complaint under penally of perjuiy that plaintiff Is a "national association duly organized...", etc.
28. 1 asked prior plainiifi's aitomeys in prior action to identify plainiiffand they refused.
29. 1 asked prior plaintiffs attorneys who hired them and they refused to answer.
30. Current Plaintiffs attorney. Victoria IL Munian. Esq.. writes in the certitlcate of merit: "1.1 am an
attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of New York,and am affiliated with the law firm of
Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP. attorney for plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Banc of
.America Funding Corporation Mortgage Pas.s- rhrough Certificates. Series 2006-F in this action."
31. She further writes that"On April 6.2016 I consulted about the facts of this case with the following
32. On March 1.2017.1 called Plaintiffs attorney office and asked for information about Plaintiff No one
could find any infonnation such as mailing address of telephone number of Plaintiff in linn's computer
system.
33. Staffmcmber directed me to call Wells Fargo at 800-416-1472. No one at this number was able to help
me and worker there directed me to call Wells Fargo at 866-234-8271. No one at that number would
34. Based on the foregoing, I aver that U.S. BANK NA1 lONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
CERTIFICATES. SERIES 2006F national association does not exist, and therefore demand its articles of
organization or formation together with information from the federal territory or state under which it
registered.
35. In addition. I conclude that some sIurIow entity together u iih attorneys conspired and knowingly
engaged in criminal fraud, harassment and plunder ofi-alsely .Accused's estate using the court as
36. Who or what "MICHAEL KRICI 1EVSK^"■ is as named defendant on the caption and documents
(attached) of this action styled in uppercase DOG-l.ATlN? Irom Wikipedia. the free encyclopedia:
Dog Latin, also known as Cod Latin, macaronic Latin, mock Latin, or Canis
Latinicus,^'' refers to the creation of a phrase or jargon in imitation of Latin.'"' often by
"translating" English words (or those of other languages) into Latin
by conjugating or declining them as if they were Latin words. Unlike the similarly
named language game Pig Latin (a form of playful spoken code). Dog Latin is more of a
humorous device for invoking scholarly seriousness.
Sometimes "dog Latin" can mean a poor-quality attempt at writing genuine Latin.' ''"
37. Now. 1 want to start a counter-claims and third-party claims of abuse of process and malicious
20()6F. but unable to fi nd a real, physical mailing address to .serve process. I am unable to fi nd a name of
man or woman who runs plaintiffas company - one more proof from Google search that plainlilTdoes not
exist.
38. Based on the ibregoing, presumption that plaintiff and its attorneys arc credible and trustworthy
destroyed. PlaintilThas to state and prove on the record all details oi'the prior transactions between alleged
plaintiff or its agents, predecessors or nominees and Falsely Accu.sed starting from application for an
alleged loan and consequent contract. If there was no loan to me - the w ill be no debt to enforce and
current action is robbery even though it happens in courtroom with presiding judge.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMA TiVl-: DEFENSE - Lack of standiim and capacity to sue
40. 1 incoiporaic by reference herein all rele\ani fuels siaietl above.
Pluintiff and its attorneys engaged in the deception of who is really foreclosing on ray home
41. I do not know whom or what alleged plainiiff is. and therefore ai loss and harassed to answer as to all
available or applicable aflirmaiive defenses and am frivolously eompelled to guess,or waive my rigius. or
become frivols litigant by alleging everything under the sun. As 1 analyze prior actions ofalleged plaintiff
and its attorneys. 1 conclude that plaintitTis not a real party in interest or had standing to initiate prior
42. Accordingly. PlainlitTbears the burden o!'establishing standing. 1 o establish standing,a plaintiiTmusl
have suffered "an injury in tact" - a violation of a legally protected right or interest which is a)concrete
The rubber stamps that plaintiff used on attached notes are fake and without dates
43. Plaintiff, upon information and belief deri\ ed from prior and this actions" e.xhibits and filings
(Exhibits B and C,shown only last pages with stamps and signatures), has no standing. As explained
below, plaintiff cannot prove that it owns the oriii'inal note and mortgage, or has been delegated the
authority to institute a mortgage foreclosure action by the owner and holder of the original subject
mortgage and note a! the time it initiated prior and this actions. 1 notice the court that Plaintiffs attorney
never pleaded the term 'holder in due course." which makes the action suspicious for fraud. In case of
44. As can be seen from the.sc exhibits of plaintiffs own documentary evidence(Exhibits B and C). they
are different and therefore inconsistent as there cannot be two original notes for one loan.
45. For example, former exhibit does not have ivvo stamps("U.S. Bank National Association tis Trustee"
the rest is not legible) that the later has. in addition, on the latter"LOAN NO.:" and "MIN NO." both
redacted for unknown and unexplained reasons, inferring tliat plaintiff has something to hide. This makes
iliese notes inconsistent as failed forgeries. 1 afso infer that there are two different loan numbers and MIN
numbers, which is the reason for reduction or black out of these numbers on ivvhibit C. fo prove perjurv',
one has to show the court that atFiant made two inconsistent statements of material fact under oath without
proving which statement is actually false. In this instance the inconsistent statements also accompanied by
different notes. Accordingly. 1 do not have to show the court which exhibit of the note is false or which
note fake and is forgery. I presume therefore that they are both forgeries because they both came from the
same source - upon information and beliel". from self-proclaimed mortgage serviccr Wells largo Bank or
its subsidiaries. Wells Fargo is notorious for fabricating foreclosure documents and lately was caught
fabricating bank accounts using stolen from its customers identity and electronic signatures using its
patent. Exhibit D. Accordingly, both alleged original notes most likely are void as forgeries by electronic
signatures.
46. 1 also notice similarities in these notes - they both lack signatures of corporate oll'icers next to mine
and lack dates ofendorsements. They fail to show a chain of title, fhese stamps fail to show which entity
endorses the note to which and when - a necessary element to show that plaintiff owned the note before
starting the action. The stamp on top right corner of both notes purportedly shows that Steven Rimmcr.Sr.
Vice President of Fairmont Funding Ltd endorsed this note to Wells l argo Bank without rccour.se. It is not
clear which Wells Fargo Bank, as there are at least a few corporations with similar names such as "Wells
Fargo Bank. N..A." Regardless, stamp without a dale is open to guesswork and attack, and therefore
nullity.
47. In addition, my purported signature is not noiari/ed and without a dale as well, which would allow
signature page be multiplied and attached to any other piece of paper..As such, anybody can conveniently
fabricate foreclosure documents including pcrjurious alTidaviis with impunity, which is the intention of
such design of fabrication. The bottom line - signature on a contract document without a date is nullity.
48. Laslh. these notes do not sltow how lianc of America or plaintitTconnecied to Wells Fargo Bank and
49. Based on the foregoing, plaintiff cannot pro\e that 1 signed any one of these notes that plaintiff claims
to own. which I believe it cannot due to the abo\ e obvious inconsistencies and evidentiary gaps. My
presumed by them original signature could be easily obtained from any scanned with my signature
document and electronically stored in database for years. Then, this signature could be mechanically
placed on any created by bank note using sold by banks de\aces that mechanically mass place signatures
on payroll checks, etc.'fhis is what 1 belie\ e VVells Fargo is doing to mass fabricate mortgage documents
50. Alternatively, is there more fraud inferred against my name by implying that I had two loans from the
lender or from two lenders, hence two original notes and two foreclosure actions on one property?
51. Did lender(s) buy two PMl policies witli these two notes and therefore claimed insurance policies?
53. How many "rabbit hole.s" are there? Plaintiff says nothing about the way it obtained the ownership of
the note or any right to foreclose. Plaintiff makes unsubstantiated claims of ownership without pleading
about chain of title. In allegations olThc complaint, there is une.Kplained gap between the alleged
assignments and plaintiff. 1 herefore. plaintiff fails to prove that it has standing to sue because it was not
the legal owner of the original note and/or mortgage with my aullwrizeJ signature, or has been delegated
the authority to institute a mortgage foreclosure action by the lawful owner and holder of the subject
54. Altematively. unidentified Plaintiff-- as shadow entity was/is trading fake, forged notes and
mortgages with other corporate entities using soid, fraudulent assignments as instruments of confidence
Fairmoni I-unding Lid went out ofbusincss in 2007. li was not. to my knowledge,succeeded by any entity.
Plaintiff, loo, does not state thai Fainnoni Funding Ltd had any successors..Accordingly, MERS could not
be a nominee ol" non-existing entity and iherelbre did not have auihoriiy to assign anything at that time,
56. Plaintiffs attorney knew or should have known that thc.se notes, mortgages and assignments fake- yet
knowingly ceriilled as original and filed them in the court's record. IMaintilTs attorney expects that this
court assist their criminal conduct to plunder my estate. As such. Falsely Accused demands discover}- and
57. Moreover,* I of this Complaint is the suspect to me for another reason slated below. In prior
litigation, altomcy for Plainti IT Frcnkel, Lambert, Weiss, Weisman & Gordon, LLP, refused to disclose
and identify the true name and nature of the Plaintiff with similar name "US BANK NATIONAL
2006-F,3476 Stateview Boulevard. Fort Mill. SC 29715" and asked the court s permission to ehange
CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH CER'TIFIC.ATES. SERIES 2006F. This time they
removed the address and added Banc t)f.America without explaining the reason why. I opposed stating
that attorneys are trying to switch two different entities and manipulate names on the note. I also raised the
defense of fraud. Instead of deciding this issue on the merit, they filed motion to discontinue prior action.
I believe they did it in order to make my cros.s-molion to dismiss moot, which they specifically stated to
Hon. Bert Bunyan. Their motion to discontinue action therefore prevented me from trial by jury to dismiss
prior action with prejudice. Di.smissal with prejudice is resolution of controversy on the merits and I
presume Plaintiff tried to avoid such outcome. Plaintiff's attorney asked me not to oppo.se that motion and
implied to let them "save their face." I agreed without knowing that the) were deceiving me by planning to
change ihc judge, who was. in my opinion, imparlial by upholding the rule of law and due process.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMA TIVH DEFENSE - Statute of limitation and laches
60. Plaintiff with its attorneys were not credible and trustworthy a.s evidenced by prior and this actions,
which is why presumption that plaintiff and its attorney are credible and trustworthy must be erased. In
prior action, alleged Plaintiff abandoned foreclosure in 2010 due to New York Attorney General and US
Attorney investigations of major banks-servicers with their foreclosure mill attonieys. and consequent
settlements of fraudulent foreclosures by the banks and attorneys. Now. Plaintiff instituted this action
more than 6 years after the alleged cau.se ofaction in t he instant Complaint accrued,tmd thcreibre is barred
61. PlaintilThad ample time to complete prior action. Accordingly, this action is time-barred due to
62. In addition. Per NY Civil Practice Law and Rules § 213(4). PlaintilTmay not sue on all or part of the
alleged mortgage debt because Plaintiff commenced this action tnore than six years after the alleged debt
63. Plaintiff contradicts itself. According to Plainiiffsown AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT AND AMOUNTS
DUE AND OWING from prior action, default and notice ofacceleration stalled on May 1. 2009. In this
notice(Exhibit E), it says that Falsely Accused is in default and if it will not be cured by August 11.2009.
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage will accelerate the note and mortgage, fhereafter. on or about September
October of 2009. Steven J. Baum. P.C. initiated foreclo.sure. Per my calculations,6 years expired on
64. Therefore, according to plaintiffs own documentaiy evidence, the entire foreclosure action is
limc-baiTcd by ihe slalulc oflimilalions because PlaintilTconinienced this aclion more lhan six years after
il accelerated the mortgage debt. Faiseh Accused requests thai the mortgage be cancelled and discharged
67. Plaintiff, in prior and in this actions, made inconsi.stent statements of fact and produced 2 different
\ersions of the so-called original mortgage aiui note in connection with the ownership and right to enforce
the note and mortgage. Now. Plaintiff must be estopped from offering into evidence .second version of
68. In addition, in prior action, plaintiff produced a notice of delault and acceleration with atfidavit ol
merit(Exhibit E)that showed the date of default May 1. 2009. In that alTidavii of merit, employee of
"8. Based on the default. PlaintilVeleclcd to call due the etuire unpaid principal balance
together with intcrc.st and disbursements, including reasonable attorney fees and costs,
allowable under the terms olThe Promissory Note and Mortgage."
69. In this aclion, PlaintiiT vaguely alleges that notice of default was sent on December 22,2015. It is
obvious that plaintiff is trying to weasel out of blown six years statute of limitation (run on March 31,
2015)olThis action when plaintiff voluniaril\ di.scontinucd prior aclion without explanation.
70. .Accordingly, plaintiff must be estopped from changing its statements under penalty of perjury.
71. Therefore, complaint must be dismissed with prejudice.
AS AND FOR .A SEVENTH AFFIRM ATI VI- DEFENSE - No Notice of Defoult bv Note Holder and
Lender
74. /Xccording to paragraph 7(C)ofthe alleged loan agreement(Note)attached to this complaint,the Note
75. Even if. which is not admitted and .stated onl\ for the sake ofargument. Plaintiff is real party in interest
with right to foreclose as lender/creditor and 1 owe PlaintilT money. I never received notice ofdefault from
76. In addition, according to*' 22 of the mortgage. Lender sends out Notice oi Deiault. As ol today, I still
AS.AND FOR AN EIGHTH .AFFIRMATIVE 1)E1'F:NSE - Accord and Satisfaction bv Sccuritization and
assumption of risk
79. Plaintiff is speaking hypothetically using the words in prior complaint and in this complaint such as
"trustee." "pass-though." and "certificates 2006-l\" By doing so. Plaintiffs aiionteys implied or created
presumption that the loan in question w as securitizcd. i.e. packaged with other loans as commodities and
.sold on Wall Street en mass. Sccuritization is a process by which loans arc packaged for sale to investors
on Wall Street in much the same manner as stocks so that w hen investor buys shares of stock they stored
electronically with a broker without particular "ID Number" to identify ciny particular .share and. most of
80. Based on the foregoing. 1 allege that there could be no Debt. Loan(s), and^'or Promi.ssor\' Notc(s)or
Mortgagees) relative to. hypothecated, or that which traces to subject property, nor is there in e.xistcnce
any individual t.)r entity who could wUhout ubsurdUy make non-frivolous claim to be a "Note Holder" of
any such Debt. Loan(s), and or Promissory Note(s) or Mortgage(s). As such, no Named or Un-known
individual or entity could identify, within commodity, and present wifhout absunUiy non-frivolous claim
adverse or otherwise as to any Rights. Title or Interests in my property. Once again, without verification of
particular parties to this action. 1 present proposition that concerns securitization. which itself naturally
creates inability to identify the holder of a loan or note as a matter of law and fact. As a result of the
implied securitization separating a note as commodity and mortgage,"any and all Rights. Title, and or
Interests to my property." allegedly held by any of the Named or Un-known parlies had been canceled,
e.vtinguished, relinquished, discharged, and/or detached, including a right to foreclose as to any and all
alleged notes and mortgages referenced herein. In addition. I allege that because of the implied
securitization and assignment to securities trust, the subject'Secured Mortgage'then became 'Null & Void'
by Operation of Law.
81. Alternatively. 1 further allege that the implied .securitization process has resulted in a full satisfaction
of the mortgage, and plaintiffs alleged interests legally have been canceled, extinguished, terminated,
and/or discharged,
82. This further explains Plaintiffs inability to claim and/or .show any damages in its complaint as
plaintiff profited from securitization. baiU)Uts and/or from defrauding investors beyond imagination.
83. Alternatively, the alleged debt has become unsecured by Operation of Law due to separation of
securitized Note and Mortgage,'fhereforc. none of the parlies claiming any rights under mortgage has
enforcement rights against my home as there is no individual or entity that can legally authorize
foreclosure.
84. Additionally and alternatively, presumed securitization was illegal or unlawful, or was fraudulently
performed to defraud investors, which resulted in huge losses to investors such as pension funds. There
was in Tad a Non-Compliance with the terms and provisions of Til.A, RLvSlT\. RlvMIC and "Servicing
and Pooling".Agreement. Therefore, alleged!) "any and all Rights. Title and Interests" in my property, for
and on behalf of all Named and Un-known parties have legally been canceled, extinguished, terminated,
85. Further and .Alternatively. PlainiilTor any Named and Un-known parties through implied
securitizaiion converted secured by mortgage debt into high risk unsecured derivative instruments, cdos.
86. Accordingly, any possible damages implied to have been sustained by the Plaintiff, if indeed
sustained, were sustained while the Plaintiff was intentionally planning to get involved in an activity
undisclosed ami concealed from me beibre an alleged contract agreement with me was made.
H7. Plaintiffor its agent concealed from me that it intends to induce me to enter into such activity using my
identity, si^natitres, notes and assij^nments with full know ledge of the potential hazard thereof. The
inherent risk incident to such activity and any damages flow ing therefrom were expected and assumed
upon entering into and continuing such activity of securitization and gambling with derivatives - withoitt
88. PlainiitTs attorneys are well aware of these rules and regulations of securitization. yet committed
attorney's misconduct and outright fraud by starting this action and attempting to plunder my estate.
91. Even if. w hich is not admitted and stated only for the sake of argument in defcn.se. there is
presumption that 1 signed the subject note - this note is not an evidence of the loan since note can be
fabricated as 1 explained above and below. Because it is impossible for me to prove a negative by
documcnlary evidence ~ the burden ol'proof thai I received a loan is on plaintiff lo step forward with
92. IHirported assignment of mortgage from MHRS to plaintilTis perjury or forgery, or both. Upon my
personal investigation and belief. Faimionl Finding Ltd, if it purportedly was in pos.sc.ssion of my Note
and Mortgage in 2005. due to implied .securitization. should have sold its rights to Note and Mortgage to
other parlies in the ehain of purported .securitization in 2005-2006 through MERS. Consequently, MERS
knew in 2009 tiiat Fairmont did not have an\ rights to these alleged Note and Mortgage, hence no
93. in 2007. upon my investigation. Fairmont Finding Ltd was sued for fraud by UBS Securities, became
insolvent, banker license was lemiinaied by the .state and Faimiont clo.sed its business in 2007. Elpiniki M.
Bechakas(Bechakas). who purportedly signed this assignment of mortgage to plaintiff, was not Assistant
Secretary and Vice President of MERS as a.ssignment deceitfully slates. In fact, she was New York
attorney working for Steven J. Baum. P.C. - Ibreclosurc mill, which was disbanded in 2010-201 Iduc to
fraud and fabrication of documents Ibr foreclosure cases. Bechakas permitted numerous Robo-signers
from this firm to fabricate a.ssignments of mortgage and sign them using her name, which is why the whole
94. Attached to this complaint assignment of mortgage allegedly signed by Bechakas is a logical
impossibility. She purportedly signed it on .August 25.2009. Little did she know that MERS did not have
authority to assign mortgage from corporation that ceased to exist in 2007. As such. I infer that this
95. Because said assignment of mortgage was void ab iniiio, no subsequent, corrective assignment can
96. .Attorney certification of"original note" i.s iraud upon the eourt by ol'ficer ofthe court as shown above.
97. In addition, certification is fraud due to egregious conflict ofintercst in violation ofadvocate-witness'
rule and due to self serving statement by the agent of the plaintiff-corporation ~ inadmissible per hearsay
rule.
100. The statute of frauds bars plaintiffs elaims. PlaintilTcaries burden of proving that lawful, written
contract exists. The alleged note and mortgage attached to the complaint does not have notary signature
and seal after my alleged signature, and as such contains no witnesses or witnessing that 1 signed said
in.struments attached to the complaint. Any student familiar with a solUvare program such as PHOTO
SHOP can electronically create any note or mortgage using my scanned signature obtained somewhere
else.
101. Interestingly, there is no signature to the contract from representative of Fairmont Finding Ltd.
102. Who allegedly sat down with me at the table on the day of closing?
103. Where is the signature olThe otTicer of 1 airmont Finding Ltd next to mine?
104. It is not there because I would easily prove pcrjuiy by deposing that man or woman.
105. The same question goes to purported assignments of mortgage. Where are two signatures of
106. As I explained above, this practice of forgery by Wells Fargo bank and others is well known and
AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMAIIVE DEFENSE - Accord and satisfaction from insurance
MOR TGAGF- PASS-THROUGH CFRTllTCATFS. SERIES 2006i\ was paid or reimbursed from
109. Alternatively. Plaintiff was reimbursed by credit default.swaps or other derivative insurance product.
110. To verify these statements, several questions must be answered. Is US BANK a trust? if it is, then
there is no Plaintiff here. Who is beneficiary? Who is creditor? Who is lender? Who is investor? Who is
holder in due eourse? Who is US BANK - securitized trust, custodian or beneficiary? As such. Falsely
111. In addition. Plaintiff was reimbursed by bailouts of banks by Federal (iovernment with my
ta.xpayer*s money, and therefore did not suffer any loss from the alleged default..Accordingly. Falsely
114. Plaintiff, its agents, predecessors and/or assignees used my name, documents, signatures, property
and personal information for profit in commerce,such as securitization and investment purposes without
115. They failed to disclose their true intent, which made transaction with me unlawful and void.
mitigate damages. As I can judge by analy/.ing complaint, plaintiff Tailed to mitigate damages.
1 19. Plaintiff had a duty to apply for its remedies from IRS by writing off an alleged default and/or by
taking income tax deduction of all or substantial part of the alleged loss, and therefore I do not owe
120. As such, an accounting was necessary to proof their claim, which they did not produce.
122. I incorporate by reference herein ail rcle\ ant facts stated above.
123. That if the Plaintiff had any lawTul claim against my property and/or me,or sustained any damages as
implied, PlaintilTs own waver waived such claim for damages when it lllcd motion for voluntary
126. Plaintiff has unclean hands. In prior actions and in this one. Plaintiff and its agents con.spired with
each other to act in bad faith. PlaintilTmade numerous false and inconsistent, misleading statements of
material tacts and documents. wT.ich its attornev s and agents entered in court record.
127. Plaintiff and its agents harassed me by litigation from 2009 until present, and at the end of prior
128. PlaintilTs agents threatened and harassed me and other occupants of the property by breaking the
gate lock and attempting to break into my apartment, which resulted in 91 1 calls to police.
129. Know ing that the property is occupied, plaintiffs agents, numerous times, posted signs on the gate
lhai agcni examined properly and deierniined iluit it is not oeeui)ied.
130. .-\genl leli only some abbreviated ID on ihe sign, which would not allow me to trace who it was
personally.
131. On another occasion, piainliir.s agents ticsj^asscd on my property and started what it appeared to me
doing "property survey" without my permi.s.sion. They refused to identify who they were, which resulted
132. In addition, in tliis action Plaintiffs attorney committed attorney's misconduct by making false,
134. 1 incorporate by reference herein all relev ant facts stated above.
135. Plaintiff was and continues maliciously prosecuting FaLsely Accused since 2009. The first
foreclosure action against me ended in m> favor in 2016, Plaintiff slandered the title to my property while
I was doing construction on it. thereby destroy ing my credit, ability to finance it and sell. This caused me
hardship and rendered me unable to continue development of the property that I .started in 2009. This, in
136. In 2016. finst foreclosure action ended in my favor by plaintiffs attorney motion to discontinue,
137. As the direct and proximate result of the above. I was damaged,continued to be damaged and will be
138. It is impossible to determine the exact amount of damages because prosecution continues into its
second stage- new,false and fraudulent aeti^m. which plaintiff started again in 2016. However, my rough
rheretbre. 1 demand judginent awarding damages. puniti\e and treble damages in the amount to be
determined at trial.
140. Falsely Accused demands trial by jury on ail i.ssues so trial able at law.
WTIEREl'ORl:-. the I'alsely Accused demandsjudgment dismissing the complaint, granting counterclaim,
granting the costs and disbursements of this action and Tor such other and further relief as to this Court
Michael Krichev.sky. sui juri.s. being duly .sworn to God. deposes and says:
That 1 am the Falsely Accused in the within action.
I have drafted the foregoing Answer with Counter-claim and know the contents thereofand the same is
true to the best of my knowledge,except as to those mailers herein stated to be alleged upon information,
belief, and that as to those matters. 1 believe them to be true.
UU
Jndcr duress, Michael Krichevsky. sui juris
4221 Atlantic Ave
Brooklyn. New York 11224
(718)687-2300
Sworn to before me this
8"'of March 2017
ALEXTE
Nstaiy Pubfic - State d New Yo(k
KO.01TE6243864
Qualified in Queens CounW t ^
jfemmission Expires June 27,20/ 7
NOTAR^UBLIC
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORA flON MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006F. NOTICE OF LIMITED
Plaintiff. APPEARANCE
-against-
motion is based on attached fabricated exhibits, including my forged signatures, fabricated facts
and perjurious attorney testimony by attorney Victoria E. Munian. Perjury happens when attorney
Verified Answer with Counterclaims(Exhibit B)to plaintifTs Unverified and undated Complaint
(Exhibit C)that I was not properly served. Any reasonable attorney knows that I can challenge
Jurisdiction at any time-even on appeal and that she ignores this issue at her personal peril. Ifthey
serve me properly, I would reject and return this complaint to them For correction ofdate and
verification per CPLR 2101(0- 1 researched the law and learned that 1 cannot be compelled to
litigate if they do not serve me properly. As it stands right now. there is a void in the law as to my
proper actions at that point, unless. I figured, they proceeded under 12 Presumptions of Roman
Court and 1 presumed guilty anyway. At this point. 1 decided to attend under doctrine oflaches and
under duress to record attorney's bad faith attitude. Victoria E. Munian rejected my Answer and
Counterclaims even though her imaginary, non-existing client is not prejudiced by her alleged
default of my non-appearance. Who is prejudiced is her real, undisclosed interloper as 1 am
After 1 learned about this fraudulent lawsuit. 1 was really surprised,confused and
prejudiced since prior law firm representing this nonexistent PlainlilT filed a motion for voluntary
discontinuance of2009 action and assured me that they will leave me alone. Since this new
harassment action, 1 started working day and night on discovery and search for remedy by doing
my due diligence. 1 located an alleged injured party - Banc of America Funding Corp-Mtg P/T
Cert Ser 2006-F Upper,James Brown Vice President, Securities Administration Services, C/0
Wells Fargo Bank. N.A., Old Annapolis Road. Columbia. MD 21045. Again. 1 found no trace of
us BANK AS TRUSTEE. I will continue my investigation.
1. Michael Krichevsky, demand for the third lime Traverse Hearing and Trial by Jur>' concerning
this false and misleading motion. 1 demand that after I submit my evidence to Judge Dear, that he
refers this matter for criminal investigation by Police or Brooklyn District Attorney. The issues of
investigation is PlaintifTs Attorncy(s)and Process Servers* joint, systemic acts of perjury against
the Public and undersigned with filing ol'knowingly False Statements in the Court Record with
intent that Judge Dear and others will use them to plunder peoples and Michael Krichevsky's
estates.
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MOR'I GAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006F. MEMORANDUM OF
Plaintiff. LAW AND
UNDERSTANDING
-against-
2. I was never served with the default letter, summons and complaint, but learned about
lawsuit by accident from my attorney. Daniel Singer, who was handling my other, unrelated case.
Attorney on the phone agreed, but under condition, that I waive jurisdiciional defenses, which I
refused. Plaintiffs attorney frivolously opposed my motion to extend time by the affirmation,
3. That affirmation was false for the reason explained below. Nonetheless, it acknowledged
4. On the hearing date. Plaintiffs attorney and I appeared. By that time, I prepared the motion
to dismiss, but did not have a chance to file it with the court and brought original with me to show
the court that I wasted no time and ready to file it. I handed a copy of this motion to Plaintiffs
attorney and told him that I intend to file it alter the hearing. During the oral arguments and in the
motion to dismiss. I averred;
"The Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the Defendant due to PlaintifTs failure
to serve process in accordance with Section 308 of the Civil Practice Law and
Rules. Plaintiff did not send debt validation letter, did not comply with
requirements of Paragraph 1303 of RPAPL. Plaintiffs affidavits ofservice
constitute SEWER SERVICE (the term coined by New York Judiciary reflecting
fraud). The address of89 Fairvicw Avenue, New York. New York is not
single-family house without an apartment number as it mislcadingly appears from
affidavit ofservice (Exhibit E). but Manhattan apartment building where
Defendant(a)did not reside as claimed by process server Robert Winckelmann;
and(b)there is no John Krichcvsky in Defendants family either. This proves the
process server did not go to this location and made up the facts in this affidavit. If
copy ofthe complaint really mailed at this address - it would be undeliverable or
dumped on the floor of the hall. The second Affidavit ofservice by Jeffry
Conocchioli(Exhibit F)fails to state that at the time of service at the address of
4221 Atlantic Ave,there was renovation going on(he must have seen it). There was
no actual defendant* dwelling where he lived with the door where pleadings could
be attached. That, again, proves that process server did not go to that location."
5. Unclean hands doctrine prohibits unethical conduct by plaintiff. A "genuine inquiry into the
defendant's whereabouts" must be made prior to resorting to "nail and mail" service.See McSorley v.Spear,
50 A.D.3d 652(2d Dep't 2008). I also voiced my confusion as to the identity of the Plaintiff in regard to
standing. Hon. Bert Bunyan explained to mc that my mortgage is in trust pool and immediately ordered
parties to appear for mandatory settlement. The confusion also existed as to who the Plaintiffis since I, as a
man, never signed a contract with the Plaintiff as legal fiction (dissimilar things do not interact orjoin).
There was no live man or woman,or affidavit from witness who attended my closing. Additionally, I
requested disclosure from Plaintiffs attorney to verify PlaintifTs standing to sue. In fact, I had/have a claim
against people who were present on my closing. Then. I heard the news that this firm is under investigation
for fraud, robo-signing and fabricated documents. I found out that Steven J Baum and Steven J Baum,P.C.
were investigated by both US Attorney's office and New York State Attorney GeneraTs office for fraud
upon the court and homeowners as foreclosure mill and documents fraud factory.
6. There was no action at that time. Then 1 heard the news that this firm was disbanded and
7. In 2011. Wells Fargo Bank sent me yet another mortgage modification offer in complete
ignorance oftwo priors. By that time. 1 was better educated on the subject of mortgage and
foreclosure fraud and sent in reply in the form of Qualif>'ing Written Request(QWR)by certified
mail. In reply. 1 didn't get an affidavit of merit in response to my QWR from Anisha N.Sims, Vice
President Loan Documentation of Wells Fargo Bank,N A., or from any other 'Vice President
Loan Documentation' for that matter, similar to attached to PlaintilTs motion for order of
reference. Now. 1 really wonder whether in 2011 Wells Fargo Bank had any 'data specialists'-
Vice Presidents or Presidents,or Assistant Secretaries able to prepare and sign aflldavit of merit or
In 2015,upon the court's and my court room examination ofthe purported note produced by Wells
Fargo bank, alleged owner and/or custodian, we learned that original owner sold its purported
claim and note "without recourse" to, in my belief, undisclosed debt buyer for pennies on the
dollar."Without recourse" indicates to the court and debt buyer that no claim can later be made
against the original owner-seller(purported holder of the authenticated note and mortgage)as to
authenticity and/or legality of the claim and note, in addition, we discovered together with the
court, that note contained an area, which was "white out" thereby hiding other endorsement or
forgery, which would be a notice and reason as to why it was sold''Without recourse to the buyer.
As the saying goes,"buyers beware" and use at your own peril. This is what now is presented in
this court.
8. To make a long story short, due to all evidentiary problems that I pointed out in my
affidavits in support of my cross motion to dismiss complaint with prejudice,second attorney firm
FRENKEL LUMBERT WEISS WEISMAN & GORDON,LLP, filed motion for voluntary
QUESTION PRESENTED
SHORT ANSWER
No discretion and ajudge commitsjudicial misconduct by knowingly disregarding law and facts
when faced with a motion to challenge jurisdiction or vacate a defaultjudgment based on lack of
personal jurisdiction; when judge deliberately refuses to evaluate whether he has personal
jurisdiction over the party, and instead grants adversary's motion for default.
ARGUMENTS
have meritorious defenses. However, if I did not have meritorious defenses, this is what court eloquently
stated in Nonh Fork Bank v. PETER PORRl HOLBRO ASSOCIATES. LLC.201 1 NY Slip Op 50402:
The copies of purportedly my mortgage and note attached as exhibits to motion for order of
reference are different from note 1 examined in court. The copies contain black spots, which 1 do
not recall seeing on the originals 1 purportedly signed. Whiteout. black spots-evidence tampering.
The Notice of Pendency. Foreclosure Complaint and affidavits attached thereto are
fictitious, false, and fraudulent legal documents filed in the Court and County Clerk's office under
penalty of perjury.
New York Federal and State Courts consistently held that a party that files a foreclosure
New York criminal statutes relating to false filings and perjuiy exist to protect citizens and
the judiciary from false filings, including §210.05:A person is guilty of perjury in the third degree
when he swears falsely;§ 210.35: A person is guilty of making an apparently sworn false statement
in the second degree when(a) he subscribes a written instrument knowing that it contains a
statement which is in fact false and which he does not believe to be true, and(b) he intends or
believes that such instrument will be uttered or delivered with a jurat affixed thereto, and(c)such
instrument is uttered or delivered with a jurat affixed thereto; and (c)§ 175.35 Offering a false
instrument for filing in the first degrce-A person is guilty orolTering a false instrument for filing in
the first degree when, knowing that a written instrument contains a false statement or false
information, and with intent to defraud the slate or any political subdivision, public authority he
offers or presents it to a public office, public servant, public ...with the knowledge or belief that it
will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records ofsuch
public office, public servant, public authority and §175.30 A person is guilty ofoffering a false
instrument for filing in the second degree when,knowing that a written instrument contains a false
statement or false information, he offers or presents it to a public office or public servant with the
knowledge or belief that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part
ofthe records ofsuch public office or public servant.
Judge must first decide the non-discretionary jurisdiction-based ground for dismissal or
vacatur under CPLR Rule 5015(a)(4). Judge Dear should schedule a trial by Jury, which will
evaluate the legitimate claim of lack of.service in this case, and determine the critical threshold
question of whether the court has personal jurisdiction over Michael Krichevsky, Service of
process is a constitutional requirement necessary for a court to have jurisdiction over a person.
Patrician Plastic Corp. v. Bernaclel Realty Corp.. 25 N.Y.2d 599.607. 307 N.Y.S.2d 868,875
(1970)("The short of it is that process serves to subject a person to jurisdiction in an action
pending in a particular court and to give notice ofthe proceedings."(citations omitted)). Moreover,
the Court of Appeals has held that the statutory requirements for personal service mandate strict
compliance. Dorfman v. Leidner.76 N.Y.2d 956,958.563 N.Y.S.2d 723.725(2000)("Service of
process is carefully prescribed by the Legislature. Regularity of process, certainty and reliability
for all litigants and for the courts are highly desirable objectives to avoid generating collateral
disputes. These objects are served by adherence to the statute..."). When a party is not properly
served,the court lacksjurisdiction over that party. See. Keane v. Kamin,94 7 NY2d 263,265,
jurisdiction, may seek dismissal based on the claim that service was not properly effectuated.").
And "therefore all further proceedings ... [arc] absolute nullities." Mayers v. Cadman Towers. 89
A motion or order to show cause taken pursuant to CPLR Rule 5015(a)(4). is brought
specifically upon the ground oflack ofjuri.sdiction to render thejudgment or order. Where vacalur
is based upon the court's lack of personal jurisdiction due to lack or improper service of process,
the movant need not show either a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense.
Prudence Y. ITng/j/, 94 A.D.3d 1073.943 N.Y.S.2d 185, 186(App. Div. 2d DepT 2012); Toyota
Motor Credit Corp. v. Lam,93 A.D.3d 713. 713-14.939 N.Y.S.2d 869.870(App. Div. 2d DepT
2012); Deutsche Bank Nat'i Trust Co. v. Pestano, 71A.D.3d 1074. 1075,899 N.Y.S.2d 269,271
(App. Div. 2d DepT 2010). This is becau.se it is''axiomatic" that "the failure to serve process in an
action leaves the court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and all subsequent
proceedings are thereby rendered null and void." Ho.s.sain v. Fab Cab Corp.,57 A.D.3d 484,485,
868 N.Y.S.2d 746(App. Div. 2d DepT 2008). See also Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., i'. Carlson,
113 A.D.2d 734,493 N.Y.S.2d 339(App. Div. 2d DepT 1985)("Absent proper service of a
summons- a defaultjudgment is deemed a nullity and once it is shown that proper service was not
affected thejudgment must be unconditionally vacated."). My first Order to Show Cause was
CPLR Rule 5015(a)(4)says "[ijhe court which rendered ajudgment or order may relieve a
party from it upon the ground of lack ofjurisdiction to render the order.** The cases that have
interpreted this issue have conilmied that there is no time limit for making a motion to vacate upon
the ground oflack ofjurisdiction. See, e.}>.. First Eastern Bank. N.A. v. Lomar Contractors, Inc.,
237 A.D.2d 248.249,684 N.Y.S.2d 172. 173(App. Div, 2d Dep*t 1997)('*[Aj motion to vacate
based upon a lack ofjurisdiction may be made at any time."): Rosehoro i'. Roseboro. 131 A.D.2d
In addition, a litigant need not refer specifically to CPLR Rule 5015(a)(4)in his or her
papers when moving for vacatur based on lack of personaljurisdiction.See Unifund CCR Partners
V. Ahmed. 2009 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6404(Sup. Ct. Nassau Cty. December 16,2009)(recognizing
that although the prose defendant"fdidj not specifically invoke CPLR § 5015(a)(4)as grounds for
relief, his sworn statement to the elTccl that he never received the Summons and Complaint raises
the question of whether or not there was jurisdiction to render a defaultjudgment in the first
in addressing the issue of personal jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR Rule 5015(a)(4), a court
must first determine whether the plaintilT properly cfTected scn ice of process. Marahie v.
IVilliams. 278 A.D.2d at 459.718 N.Y.S.2d at 401 ("Whether or not service was properly
pursuant to C.P.L.R. 5015(a)(1)."); Cipriano v. Hank, 197 A.D.2d 295.298.610 N.Y.S.2d 523»
520(App. Div. 1st Dep*t 1994)("Defendant's lack of a reasonable e.xcuse is obviated if the court
is without personal jurisdiction over defendant,and all subsequent proceedings would be rendered
null and void.")(citation omitted): AnaHo r. Barry, 149 A.D.2d 640,641, 540 N.Y.S.2d 460,461
(App. Div. 2d Dep't 1989)("fTjhe court erred in vacating the default as excusable pursuant to
C.P.L.R. 5015(a)(1) without initially resolving the jurisdictional issue under C.P.L.R.
5015(a)(4).")(citation omitted).
A court determines whether PlaintilT effected service of process properly by reviewing the
facial validity ofthe affidavit of service and other documents. De Zego v. Bruhn,67 N.Y.2d 875,
877,501 N.Y.S.2d 801,801-802(1986),"[l|t is well established that the affidavit ofa process
server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service." In re de Sanchez,57 A.D.3d 452,454,
870 N.Y.S.2d 24.26(App. Div. 1st Dep'i 2008). In order to rebut the presumption of proper
service the defendant must personally contest the service on motion. IValkes v. BenoU,257 A.D.2d
508. 508,684 N.Y.S.2d 533.534(1st Dcp'i 1999). In defendant's moving papers, he or she must
either submit a sworn denial ofservice or swear to ^ecific facts to rebut the process server^s
affidavit. Puco v. DeFeo,296 A.D.2d 571. 571. 745 N.Y.S.2d 719, 719-20(App. Div. 2d Dep't
2002):see also Parker v. Top Homes, Inc.. 58 A,D.3d 817.873 N.Y.S.2d 112(App. Div.2d Dep't
2009)(finding that the defendant "failed to submit a sworn denial ofservice or specific statements
stating that "the absence ofdefendant's sworn denial ofservice is not fatal.")
Accordingly, when a defendant submits a sworn denial of.service, he or she rebuts the
process ser\'cr*s affidavit ofservice,and the defendant is entitled to a traverse hearing, at which the
plaintilT must prove jurisdiction by a preponderance of evidence. See. c.^.. Elm Management
Corp. v. Sprung. 33 A.D,3d 753. 754-55. 823 N.Y.S.2d 187, 188-89(App. Div. 2d Dep't 2006)
(reversing the denial ofthe defendant's motion lo dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction by
reason of improper service of process, and holding that the defendant's sworn denial of receipt of
process was sufficient to rebut the plaintifl's affidavit of service and the plaintiff, therefore, was
Savings Bank i'. Steinman^ 206 A.D.2d 404.613 N.Y.S.2d 945(App. Div. 2d Dep'l 1994)
(remanding for a traverse hearing,slating:"The sworn denials ofthe appellants that they had been
served with process pursuant to CPLR 308(2), as alleged by the plaintiffs process server, requires
a hearing to determine whether they were in fact properly served"). See also. e.g.. Matter ofTNT
of receiving the Summons and Complaint and that I have witnesses to support my denial. In
addition. I have the right to cross examine process server and impeach him during a trial or
hearing. As such, I raised the issues sufficient to rebut presumption ofcredibility of Plaintiffs
affidavit of service. Thus. Judge Dear should schedule Traverse Hearing and require Plaintiff to
Alternatively,even when a defendant receives actual notice ofthe existence ofan action by
10.
means other than the service of process in a manner authorized by law. receipt ofthe actual notice
cannot cure the insufTicient service of process. See. e.f^.. Ruffin v. Lion Corp.. 15 N.Y.3d 578,583,
915 N.Y.S.2d 204(2010)("Defendant's actual receipt ofthe summons and complaint is not
dispositive ofthe efficacy ofservice."); Macchia Russo.67 N.Y.2d 592.595,505 N.Y.S.2d 591,
593(1986)("Notice[ofthe action] received by means other than those authorized by statute does
not bring a defendant within the jurisdiction ofthe court.**); Krisilas v. Moimi Sinai Hospital^ 63
A.D.3d 887. 889,882 N.Y.S.2d 186,188(App. Div. 2d Dep't 2009)("Such a defect in [service of
process] is not cured by the defendant's subsequent receipt of actual notice of the action,'since
notice received by means other than those authorized by statute cannot serve to bring a defendant
within the Jurisdiction of the court**'). Therefore, the court once again ignored the law by ignoring
CONCLUSION
Judge Dear should schedule a Traverse Hearing, or, alternatively,compel plaintiff to accept my
answer with counter-claims and move on to discovery since plaintiff is not prejudiced by an
11
EXHIBIT E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006F. NOTICE OF
Plaintiff, CROSS-MOTION TO
DISMISS AND FOR
-against- SANCTIONS
Justice
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,et al. Oral argument is not
Defendants. requested
COUNSELORS:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,that upon the annexed affidavit of Michael Krichevsky, sui
juris,sworn to the 27th day of November. 2017 and upon all the pleadings and proceedings
heretofore had herein without presence of Falsely Accused, he will cross-move. Under Duress,
before this Court at an IAS Part I. room 756. at the Courthouse located at 360 Adams Street,
Brooklyn,New York on the 8th day of November,2017 at 9:30 a.m. in the forenoon ofthat day or
as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard for Judgment dismissing the action with prejudice and
1. Take Judicial notice of Defendant's status as alive man, not juristic entity or legal fiction
such as corporation,trust or estate spelled NAME in all capital letters on caption and in exhibits of
this action.
2. As a first step, set in-court identification testimony ofPlaintiffand order alleged plaintiffs
attorney, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. to show authority per New York State Agency laws
to represent alleged Plaintiff by disclosing identity ofthe parties to retainer per CPLR 3013 and
3. Dismiss the action with prejudice per CPLR §32II (a)(5)-as6 years Statute ofLimitation
run.
5. Order WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP. to rebut my supporting afTidavit point for point
with paper evidence in their possession per CPLR 2214(c)as I expect that they would not do it
intentionally.
6. Thereafter, per CPLR 2214(c)papers to be produced on notice and per CPLR 2218 trial of
issue raised on motion compel WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP. to produce thejury proof of
Plaintiffs standing and identity; direct attorney allegedly representing corporation or trust in court
to appear with corporate charter and/or other forming documents to rule out champerty, verify
Plaintiffs status, name,address and requirement to post a non-resident bond.
upon the grounds offraud, misrepresentation; misconduct. Judiciary 478,evidence tampering and
per unclean hands doctrine.
9. Additionally and alternatively, dismiss with prejudice NUNC PRO TUNC the action per
CPLR §3216 for failure to prosecute 2009 action, doctrines of equitable estoppels and laches.
10. In the event this motion is not persuasive, compel Plaintiff to accept filed answer with
11. In addition, for such other and further reliefas to this Court may seem Just and Equitable,
12. Dismiss the action per CPLR §3211 (a)(1),(2),(3).(5),(7),(8)and dismiss the action
upon the grounds offraud, misrepresentation and misconduct.
13. Alternatively, dismiss NUNC PRO TUNC the action per CPLR §3216 for failure to
15. Sanction attorneys for alleged Plaintiff for frivolously starting this action.
17. In the event this motion is lost, compel plaintiff accept my Answer and counter-claim.
18. In addition, for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem Just and Equitable,
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006F,
Unidentified Plaintiff,
-against-
1. I am alive man,the Falsely Accused in the within fraudulent and by nature felonious action
2. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my first-hand knowledge and personal
experience from 2009,and ifcalled on as a witness, I could competently testify as follows below.
3. I make this affidavit in self-defense. Under Duress and Coercion(including Violence as I
am being eaten, killed, or destroyed by the BAR)since this action is Round III(two rounds were
lost) by some interloper. As such, I do not consent to this unlawful kangaroo court proceeding
4. I make this affidavit in support ofthis cross-motion to dismiss, for defaultjudgment and
Order to Show Cause for Sanctions to establish a recorded pattem ofconcerted criminal acts(mens
order of reference.
service in this court. Exhibit A.The reason they are notorious because in 2010 they were
investigated by New York State Attorney General and United States Attorney for their fraudulent
robo-signlng practices in creating assignments and fraud upon the court. As result, Steven J.
Baum,P.C. settled, paid fines and disbanded. Upon information and belief, my case was on a class
member list that law enforcement investigated since Steven J. Baum. P.C. abandoned foreclosure
against me. Particularly, in numerous cases that Steven J. Baum. P.C. handled and in my case,
undisclosed employee from said firm permitted and rented her name to unidentified people who
were fabricating, inter alia, notarized assignments and used said employee name to sign those
assignments. Investigation revealed that said employee, Elpiniki M. Bechakas Esq., tum out to be
- attorney of Steven J. Baum,P.C. while falsely claiming that she is Assistant Secretary and Vice
President" of MERS.In that round oflitigation, I asked Steven J. Baum,P.C.to clarify and identify
whom or what U.S. BANK is and why it suing me.They went silent.
thereto were fictitious, false,and fraudulent legal documents filed in the Court and County Clerk's
9. Foreclosing party as plaintiff has the burden of proof. According to doctrine ofjudicial
estoppel, 1 rebutted presumptions of validity of plaintiffs name and its averments in complaint.
This, in tum,shifted burden of proofon alleged Plaintiffand its attorneys to come with admissible
evidence. They intentionally failed to meet the burden by acting professionally incompetent and/or
blissfully ignorant of my demands in my affidavit supporting motion to dismiss and for sanctions,
Exhibit B.
10. Simultaneously, said law enforcement authorities started investigation of the major 5
banks,including Wells Fargo- alleged servicer. Upon information and belief that investigation
resulted in fines and consentjudgments including against Wells Fargo for fraudulent foreclosure
practices.
11. On or about 2013, Administrative Judge Lawrence Knipel dismissed the action for failure
12. In January 2014, alleged Plaintiff. U.S. BANK,allegedly hired Frenkel, Lambert, Weiss,
Weisman & Gordon, LLP to restore foreclosure action to calendar and for order of reference.
Supporting affirmation, attached as Exhibit E,now states different facts from facts in
13. Once again, still undisclosed interloper forced me to defend my property and me against
new false accusations by filing cross-motion to dismiss foreclosure action. Once again, 1 rebutted
identity of US BANK,all their sworn statements, newly fabricated exhibits and so-called
14. As attorneys, they knew that by operation oflaw, they required filing counter-affidavit or
my affidavit stands as facts and truth of the case admitted by them. Again,accordingly to doctrine
ofjudicial estoppel, 1 rebutted presumptions of validity of each document. This, in turn, shifted
burden of proofon alleged Plaintiffand its new attorneys to come with admissible evidence. They
intentionally failed to meet the burden. In my cross-motion to dismiss, I requested trial by jury in
order to dismiss this action with prejudice. In reply,they filed cross-motion to discontinue and
requested that I do not oppose that motion and that I will be never bothered again. Per their request,
1 did not oppose that motion and it was granted by Hon. Bert Bunyan, Exhibit F.
crime of instigating controversy and profiting from it while Federal law, inter alia, calls it RICO.
16. Unified Court System's rules published on its website in section Affidavit in Support of
17. In this case, movant is U.S. BANK. Because it is legal fiction, some employee with
authority and competence to verify complaint must sign verification in order for the complaint to
be valid.
18. Upon my personal investigation of foreclosure mills, no bank's employee ever verified
complaint, which is also the case in all 3 Rounds offoreclosure.
19. Alleged Plaintiffs motion for order ofreference, which is second after 2013,too does not
have movant's affidavit in support from US BANK.
NOTICE: Victoria Munian,Esq. you must rebut this affidavit point for point and/or should
contact your licensed attorney for advice on how to report this case to your professional
liability insurance carrier
20. Fact, I have not seen any and therefore aver that there is no documentary evidence in this
case that shows existence ofany employee from US BANK.
21. This makes its motion defective and nullity. Alleged PlaintifTs attorneys deceitfully use
so-called * witness affidavit' from alleged servicer. Wells Fargo,to cover up this defect
22. WOODS OVIATT OILMAN, LLP does it on purpose to avoid identifying interloper who
hired them. As attorneys' from said firm allegedly awarded status of Super Lawyers,they
definitely know that attorney's affirmation is an opinion or argument before the court and must
rely on facts averred by their client, U.S. BANK. As such, I object to this defective motion and
demand sworn supporting affidavit from qualifying employee of US BANK. Without this
affidavit, 1 cannot be compelled to argue fraud with fiction as fiction is dead and 1 cannot impeach
it in front ofjury. I can cross-examine attorneys from WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP who are
deceitfully attempting to act as fact witnesses in violation of"advocate- witness" rule of New
York Rules of Professional Conduct, but that would still create a Theater of Absurdity since I
23. In addition to this obvious fraud upon the court by officers ofthe court from WOODS
OVIATT OILMAN,LLP,no attorney from the firm or employee from alleged servicer has any
24. In addition, none ofthe people involved dares to say that in 2005 and/or thereafter they
were custodians ofthe documents they allegedly reviewed. I bet that most ofthem if not all did not
even woric as attorneys or servicer's employees from 2005. As such,any certification from
attorney's office,affirmation or affidavit under penalty of perjury, or exhibit they are pushing into
the court's record is inadmissible hearsay,and even worse-fabrication from Wells Fargo given to
them.
25. In addition to this obvious fraud upon the court. Affirmation of regularity(Exhibit G)
27. Victoria Munian, Esq. knows that there is history of prior foreclosure vexatious litigation,
28. Victoria Munian, Esq. intentionally omits this history in her affirmation ofregularity.
29. The statement in 11 ofaffirmation of regularity is false because this is second order of
reference.
30. Noticeably, Jason Bailey, clerk of WOODS was itching to say to me who the interloper is
in this case and did so in his affidavit of mailing below notary stamp. Exhibit G:
"Re: Aflldavii of Mailing of Motion for Order of Reference
WELLS FARGO BANK,N.A. vs. KRICHEVSKY,MICHAEL,et al.
Kings Co. Supreme Court# 506127/2016"
No joinder and no jurisdiction over alive man Michael Krichevsky and US BANK under
32. I move this Honorable Court to take mandatory judicial notice that under common law of
this Nation, my proper name,as alive man. must be styled according to Judeo-Christian
Appellation as Michael Krichevsky. As a man of God, I take personal insult when my name
fraudulently spelled or styled MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY as in cemetery or graveyard. I believe
that this done on purpose to join US BANK and me, Michael Krichevsky. in this felonious and
simulated action. To achieve this goal, Supper Lawyers from WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP
decided to mischaracterize my status and me as legal person -a legal fiction in Roman law -
corporation (dead corps) without God's given Natural Rights that only alive man posses so that
they can human traffic me into their corporate fiction jurisdiction. A legal fiction is an assumption
that something that is(or may be)false or nonexistent is true or real. Intemationally recognized
The Chicago Manual ofStyle supports my contention. Even "Chambers Handbook for Judges'
Law Clerks and Secretaries"(available in the web)stales,"It is also useful to have a stylebook,
such as The Chicago Manual ofStyle, published by the University of Chicago Press." In
conclusion, the lawful court takes mandatory judicial notice that I am not the legal fiction
33. Based on above, I conclude that all so called "evidence" attached as exhibits where my
name styled MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY is bizarre, prejudicial, fraudulent and misleading the
court even under presumption that these documents are copies of originals I allegedly signed,
which they are not. On the other hand, if I assume for the sake of argument that I did sign them,
which I deny,these documents would be void due to fraud that would be perpetrated against me by
deceit and nondisclosure ofintent to mischaracterize my status as a dead man or corporate legal
fiction. As such,this action must be dismissed with prejudice for lack ofjurisdiction as courts
34. In court there is slogan In God We Trust Scripture says,"Lying lips are abomination to the
LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight. Proverbs 12:22. This case is continuation of prior
pattern and practice where alleged plaintiff and its prior attorneys were "lying lips."
35. One of the fundamental pillars of Anglo-Saxon Jurisprudence is the adversary system
based on the premise that the truth is best determined in court ifequally equipped and intelligent
advocates argue their adverse positions before a disinterested neutraljudiciary orjury.
36. State and federal laws require that litigation be brought in the name of a legal real party in
interest having capacity to sue which in foreclosure cases means that a purported foreclosing
mortgagee with legal capacity to sue(synonymous with standing) must own the loan when filing a
foreclosure lawsuit.
37. NOTICE:due to threat from hurricanes projected to hit New York in the beginning of
September,as hurricane Sandy survivor, 1 abandoned work on that affidavit and started packing to
evacuate. Thereaf\er,as threat subsided I started unpacking. As such,1 did not completely finished
my affidavit and notify WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP that 1 will supplement the later.
WHEREFORE,I respectfully move this court forjudgment on this cross-motion dismissing this
action with prejudice and sanctioning attorneys of WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP;and for
such other and further reliefas to this Court seemsjust and proper, including the costs ofthis
litigation.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ALICE ASHER
WOTARY PUBLIC,State Of New York
NG.01AS6062200
Qualified In Kings County
Comirtission Expires 07/30/2021
HELP FOR HOMEOWNERS IN FORECLOSURE
NEW YORK STATE lAW REQUIRESTHAT WE SEND YOU THIS NOTICE ABOUT THE
FORECLOSURE PROCESS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
VOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE
.'.I
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IN THIS FORECLOSURE ACTION,YOU MAY LOSE
YOUR HOME. PUASE READ THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT CAREFULLY. YOU
SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR YOUR LOCAL LEGAL AID
OFfICE TO OBTAIN ADVICE ON HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
To locate an entity near you, you may all the toll-hree helpline maintained by
the New York State Banking Department at 1-877-BANK-NYS (1-877-22&-5697}.
or visit the department's website at WWW.BANKINf:-STATE^NY.US.
Be careful of people who approach you with offers to "save'' your home. There
are individuals who watch for notices offoreclosure actions in order to unfairly
profitfrom a homeowner's distress. You should be e^remely careful about any
such promises and any suggestions that you pay them a fee or sign over your
d^d.State law requires anyone offering such services for profit to enter Into a
contfad which fully describes the services they will perform and fees they will
charge, and which prohibits them from taking any money from you until they
have completed all such promised services.
§1303 NOTICE
A
nwtnf Niimhn
n<illAk>.NY l4i4()-l2'JI
Kji N'limlin
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY
4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
BROOKLYN,NY 11224
This office represents the above named creditor. Piea.sc be advised ihai a claim in the amount of
$771,683.85 calculated through 10/07/2009, ha.s been referred to u.s for appropriate action,such as a mortgage
foreclosure proceeding.
As of 10/07/2009. the unpaid balance of the debt secured by the Property is $771,683.85, comprised of
the following:
TOTAL $771,683.85
If you have been granted a discharge in bankruptcy,our client does not seek to hold you personally liable
for the debt. However, we are prepared to foreclose on the Property to satisfy the debt.
Because of interest, late charges, property tax advances, property insurance advances, inspection fees
and other charges that may vary from day to day, the amount due on the date payment is made may be greater
than the current balance set forth above. Hence, if the amount shown above is paid, an adjustment may be
necessary after payment is received, in which event we will inform you before depositing the payment.
For further information, call our office at 716-204-2400 or 716-204-9400. If you are actively engaged in
military service, or have been activated from reserve status, it is important that you contact us.
Unless you notify us within thirty days after receipt of this letter that you dispute the validity of this
debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed by us to be valid. If you notify us in writing within thirty
days after receipt of this letter that the debt or any portion thereof is di.sputed, we will obtain veriftcation of the
debt or a copy of a judgment against you, if any, and we will mail you a copy of such verification or judgment.
Upon your written request within thirty days after receipt of this letter, we will provide you with the name and
address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor.
This communication pertains to your dealings with me a.s a debt collector. It does not affect your
dealings with the New York State Court, and in particular, it docs not change the time at which you must answer
the Complaint, or other legal pleading. The Summons is a command from the Court, not from me, and you must
follow its instructions even if you dispute the validity or amount of the debt. This communication also does not
affect my relations with the Court. As a lawyer. 1 may file papers in the suit according to the Court'.s rules and
the Judge's instructions.
STEVEN J. BAUM.P.C.
The law firm of Steven J. Baum, P.C. and the attorneys whom it employs are debt collectors who are attempting
to collect a debt. Any information obtained by them will be u.sed for that purpose.
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT:COUNTY OF KINGS
PiaintifT, SUMMONS
vs.
ORIGINAL FBL THE
Defendantfs).
NOTICE
YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME
YOU
r—
MUST RESPOND BY SERVING A mpY OF THK ANSWRR ON
X KJJP A JtlJCi ATNa WILK C If
THE ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF fMORTGAGE COMPANY)
AND FILING THE ANSWER WITH THE COURT.
to I
to collect a debt. Any information '•"»P'®ys
obtained by them will be used <iebl collectors who are atlcmpling
for that pmposc.
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT;COUNTY OF KINGS
Plaintiff.
vs. COMPLAINT
Defcndant(s).
X
The Plaintiff by its attorneys, Steven J. Baum. P.C., for its complaint against tlie Defendant(s) alleges
upon information and beliefas follows:
FIRST: Plaintiffis a national banking association duly organized and existing under and by virtue ofthe
laws of the United States of America and having its principal place of business in Cincinnati. OH,and the owner
and holder ofa note and mortgage being foreclosed.
SECOND: On or about the 14th day ofDecember, 2005, MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY duly executed and
delivered an adjustable rate note whereby MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY promised to pay the sum of S747,600.00
with interest on the unpaid balance ofthe ddst.
THIRD: That as security for the payment of said note MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY duly executed and
delivered a mortgage in the amount of$747,600.00 which mortgage was recorded as follows and mortgage tax
paid thereon:
FOURTH: The mortgaged premises are commonly known as 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE,
BROOKLYN, NY 11224 and more fully described in "Schedule A" attached to this complaint. The lax map
designation is known as all or part ofSBL: Block 7026,Lot 53.
FIFTH: That the Defendant(s) MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY so named, has/have failed to comply with the
conditions ofthe mortgage and note by fiailing to pay principal and interest and/or(axes, assessments, water rates,
insurance premiums,escrow and/or other charges that came due and payable on the 1st day ofMay,2009 as more
fully set forth below. Accordingly, Plaintifi*elects to call due the entire amount secured by the mortgage.
SIXTH: There is now due and owing on said mortgage(he following amounts:
Together with monies advanced for taxes, insurance, maintenance of premises and the costs, allowances
and reasonable attcroey's fees if permitted by the mortgage. The interest rate stated above may change in
accordance with the adjustable rale feature ofthe note or loan agreement.
SEVENTH: In order to protect its security interest the Plaintiff or its agent has paid or may be compelled
to pay during the pendency of this action, taxes, assessments, water rates, insurance premiums and other charges
affi^ng the mortgaged premises. Plaintiff requests that any sums it or its agent has paid, together with interest,
be included in the sum otherwise due as provid^ for and secured by the mortgage.
EIGHTH: Upon information and beliefall the defendants herein have or claim to have some interest in or
lien upon said mortgaged premises or some part thereof which interest or lien, if any, has accrued subsequent to
the lien of PlaintilTs mortgage, or has been paid or equitably subordinated to PlainlifTs mortgage, or has been
duly subordinated thereto. The reason for naming said defendants is set forth in "Schedule B" that is attached to
this complaint.
NINTH: The reason for naming any governmental agency or instrumentalities of the Federal, State or
local government(howeverdesignated), is set forth in "Schedule C" that is attached to this complaint.
TENTH: Upon infmmation and belief the defendant(s)"John Doc" are occupants of the premises being
fbr^losed, or may be any persons, corporations or entities who claim, or may claim, a lien or other interest
against the premises.
ELEVENTH: Ifapplicable,the mortgage originated in compliance with Banking Law Sections 595-a and
6-1 or 6-m and the Plaintiff has complied with all of the provisions of Section 595-a of the Banking law and any
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Section-6-1 and 6-in of the Banking I.aw, and Section 1304 of the
Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law.
said premises be sold subject state of facts^M tojudgment offoreclosure and sale,
survey ofthe premises wouTd or an accurate
any; building and zoning oidinancU and possible vioIatio^oTtS agreements ofrecord, if
possession of the premises; any equity of redemntion of ieoms or persons in
within 120 days; mort^e« a^ SetL ff^L Ift the premises
requests
to satisfythe
thejudgment offoreclosure provide for the sale ofthe parcels in a particular order to the extent necessary
indebtedness.
SEVEOTEENTH: The interest of Plaintiff in the property is set forth in paragraph "FIRSr. above,
infants. -
anri.»ai
and P^®h"en(s)ofDefendanl
adverse to the mortgage bemg foreclosed andCAPITAL RESOURCES
Q..h!.w^K J . ^ CORPORATiriM..appears to be
u prior
Article 15 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. extinguished pursuant to
TWENTY-FIRST: Plaintiff hereby requests that the Judgment of Forcelosum state the following:
th mortgage
the Art being ^JUDGED Alv© DECREED,
foreclosed, namely that llie licn(s)CAPITAL
the lien of Defc!idant(s) which appear(s) to be prior
RESOURCES and advcise to
CORPORATION
is/are hereby declared invalid and extinguished pursuant to RPAPL Article 15; and it is further
ADJUDGED DECREED, that Defendant CAPITAL RESOURCES
3foreclos^
^ r I i?ofr and/fiom all nght. claim,
claiming by,through
lien, interest or under
or equity them, be andinareandhereby
of redemption forever
to said barred
mortgaged
premises; and it is further ® ®
r\ r j CAPITAL RESOURCES
Defendant ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
CORPORATION thatand
is invalid theextinguished;
record be reformed
and it istofurther
reflect that the lien of
.u
throu^ ^TVENTY-FIRST",as though fully set forthre-alleges
herein. the allegations contained in Paragraphs •'FmSP'
on Deconber
„ r. 2 2005 m Qty Register File No.(CRFN)2005000701374 (attached
dated hereto
December as Schedule
14.200S A-l)
and recoided
accurately descnbes said property. » wrvt«.uuio « i^,
2005000^^1^!^'
^500W01375 ihe description
did not tave a legal mortgage rerardrf December
affixed thereto 21.description
aad the 2005 in City Registerin File
oonlained deedNo. (CRFN)
recoided oi^
^1^1^21.2005 m aty Rr^ister File No.(CRFN)2005000701374 should be substituted to refiecl the intent
'■'mntifr hereby requests reformation of the said mortgage recorded December 21
200500070I375 by Order of this Court as^cSta^ a
Judgment of Foreclosure statmg the following:
fte
legal description In the mortgage recorded December 21 2(10^ in Piiw
Register File No. (CRFN) 2005000701375 is hereby reformed so .haute plo^e^y a^fofiowf '
ALL that certain plot, jnece or parcel ofland, whh the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lyingand
betngmlheBonntghofBiookl}m,CountyofKings,CityandStateofNewYoik,l(nownanddesignatedoninapentit{ed
"Map ofSection ANoiton Poinfmade by Fontand Beach, surveyors, 1894 and filedin the Ofitce ofRegister Kings
County, April 20,1894, #351-352-353 in Block#? ofsaid map and described with reference to thcpri vateroad, laid
down on said map as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on theNorthetly lineof Atlantic Avenueonsstid map, 160 feet Westerly the intersection
of said Northerly line with the Westerly side of Beach 42nd Street;
RUNNING THENCE Westerly along the Northerly lino ofAtlantic Avenue as it curves to the Westerly line oflot 351
on said map;
THENCBNortheriyalongthe Westerlylineoflot35J (vrfuchlineisrmaiadius offhecoccentiiccurvesofAtlanticand
Suxf Avenues); 100 feet to the middle line ofblock between Atlantic and SurfAvenues;
THENCEEastcrlyalongthemiddlelineofthe block asitcurve$,60feettothe Westerly line ofiot354 oasaid map;
thenceSoutherlyatrightanglesto Allantic Avenueand alongthe Westerlylineofsaid lot#354,100feetto the point
or place ofBEGINNING.
1. Adjudging and decreeing the amounts due the Plaintiff for principal, interest, costs, late charges,
expenses ofsale, allowances and disbursements, reasonable attorney's fees if provided for in the
mortgage and any monies advanced and paid which are secured by the mortgage.
2. That the defcn^ts and all persons claiming by,through or under them and every other person or
entity whose right, title, conveyance or encumbrance is subsequent to or subsequently recorded
or w^lien is being challenged by being a defendant in this action, be barred and foreclosed of
Md from all right,claim, lien, interest or equity ofredemption in and to said mortgaged premises
3. That the said mortgaged premises,or such part thereof as may be necessary to raise the amounts
^
TWEt,FTH"ofthis complaint.
^ according to law subject to the provisions of paragraph
4. That out ofthe monies arising from the sale thereof, the Plainuff may be paid the amounts due on
said note and mortgage, plus ^ose items referenced in paragraph I, above, together with any
siuns expended as aforesaid, with interest as allowed by law upon any advances from the dates of
the respective payments,so far as the amount ofsuch money properly applicable thereto will oav
the same. '
5.
5 That either or aiiy ofthe parties to this action may become a purchaser upon such sale.
6. That this court, ifrequested, forthwith appoint a receiver ofthe rents and profits ofsaid premises
with the usual powers and duties.
7. That the defradanls referred to in paragraph "FIFTH" of this complaint and any original or
subs^uent obligors so named in this action, may be adjudged to pay any deficiency that may
remain after applying all ofsaid monies so applicable thereto, unless the ddit has been listed and
discharged In a bankruptcy petition, or unless the Plaintiffis unable to produce a copy of the note
in which case no deficiencyjudgment will be sought. '
8. In the event PlainUff possesses any other liens against the premises, they shall not be merged with
the same. Plaintiffspecifically reserves its right to share in any surplus monies arising from the
sale of the subject premises by virtue of its position as a judgment or oUier lien creditor
excluding the mortgage being foreclosed herein.
9. That IMeadam CAPFTAL RESOURCKS CORPORATION'S inlerest in the mortgaged premises
and all persons or entities claiming by. through or under them, be declared invalid and
extinguish^, and that Defendant CAPITAL RESOURCES CORPORATION and all persons or
^titi^ claiming by, through or under them, be barred and foreclosed ofand from all right,claim
lien, inter^t or equity or redemption in and to said mortgaged premises and that the plainliff be
granted reformation of the record to reflect said lien being extinguished.
10. Awarding the reliefrequested in the SECOND cause ofaction stated in this complaint.
1!. Awarding the reliefrequested in the THBRD cause of action stated in this complaint.
12. That the Plaintiff may have such other and further reliefas may bejust, equitable and proper.
By:
Michael J^Wrona,Esq.
Steven J. Baum,P.C
Attorneys for Plaintiff
220 Northpointe Paiicway Suite G
Ainherst,NY 14228
Tel.: 716-204-2400
The law finn ofSteven J. Baum,P.C.and the altomQ^s whom it employs arc debt collectors who arc attempting
to collect a debt. Any infonnation obtained by them will be used for that purpose.
PRIME TITLE SEARCH,LLC
SCHEDULE A
DESCRIPTION
THENCENoitherlyalongihe Westerlylineoflot351(whichlineisonaradiusoftheconcenliiccurvesofAtlanlicand
Surf Avenues); 100 feet to the middle line of block between Atlantic and Surf Avenues;
THENCEEastcrly along lhemiddlelineoftheblockasitcurves,60feettothe Westerly rmeoflol354onsaid map;
THBNCESoutheriyalrightan^esto Atlantic Avcnucandalongthe Westerlylineofsaid lotS354,100feetto thepoint
or place ofBEGINNING.
SCHEDULE A
NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OF THE CITY REGISTER
PROPERTY DATA
Boroufih Block Lot Unit Adtlress
BROOKLYN 7026 53 EntitoUl 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
Property Type: 1- 2FAM WITH ATTCH GAR./OR VACANT LAND
PARTIES
GRANTOR/SELLER: GRANTEEmUYER:
SAMUEL W.COHEN MiaiABL KRICHEVSKY
4505 BEAai 45T1T STREET 120 OCEANA DRIVE W., APT 5D
BROOKLYN.NY 11224 BROOKLYN,NY 11235
10
NYC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OP THE CITV REGISTER
20051215002040Q10Q1C1C3A
RECORDING AND ENDORSEMENT COVER PACE ICONTINUATIOffl PACE 2 OF S
Doeament ID: 200512l£0020400l OocumemDaie;i2-14-2005 Prepaialion Date: 12-15-2005
Document T^pe: DEED
PARTIES
GRANTOR/SELLER:
FRANCES COHEN
4505 BEACH 4STH STREET
BROOKLYN,NY 11224
SCHEDULE A-1
11
coHmTyoroi^gRBEFoaEsicKwamwsnuttiainHiStiisreuMEHratoviDBEOSEOBifiAwvERsoKiT
THIS INOEMTUI^ tnatfeUtC l9**aafet DECEMBER,200$
BETWEEN
SAMUEL W.COHEN and FRANCES COHSN
4505 BEACH45™ SnSET
BROOKLYN.NEW YORK 11224
party or Q)a rnt pad.and
MICHAEL KRtCHEUSKY
120 OCEANA DRIVE W.,APT SO
BROOKLYN.NEU/YORK11235
party of the second pait
WnNESSETH,^1Bta party of(he imn,in consMerafion of
doflais paU by the party of(ha second part.
OO0S Iweoy giani and rtieaso enb the party of(ha second paiL the lieirs or successors and asdtans ofOie
party oftt»second part Itorever,
ALL that certain pSoL pteee or parcel of land, wi9t the buibinss and Impiovements thereon erected. «sina>n.
tying and faeli^ In Bis
'.VJMAj SEE SCHEDULE'A*ANNEXED HERETO.
PREMISES COMMONLY KNOWN AS:
42-21 ATLANTIC AVENUE
BROOKLYN. NEWYORK
BSNO and bitended to be the same piemises conveyed to the pany of tho lirst part by deed dated
12120/1995. and leootded In the OIEce of(he dly Regkler of Mngs County 02/05/1934 In Reel 3206 Page
1640.
f TOGETHER wffii all ilghL tlBo and inleresL H any.of the party of the fbst part h and to any streets and roads
I slrattlng dia abovedesctSied premises to the center nnes(hereot TOGETHER wbh the ap^enances and nO
j Un estate and i^ts of Bu party of the ftst part in and to said prsnhes; TO'HAVE AND TO HOLD 8»
premises herein smnlsd unto B» party oftoe second part, the hsftsorsucoessom and assigns ofthe party of
} thesecond partforever.
AND the party of the fEfst part cQvenanis (hat the party of the ritst pert has not dona or suffered anyddng
vrttera^ the said premises have been encundiered in any way vihatover,except asafoiesshL
AND the party of the ftist part,in compfiance wilh Section 13 of tho Uen law,covenants that the party of lha
fdsl part wSf reeeivo tha oo/skfereBon far thisconveyance end wfQ hold the ifght!o receive such oonsldareBon
asa bustfund to tia applied fiist for(he ptupose of paying lha oeN ofthe improvementand wO apply the same
fiislto lha payment ofthe cost of tho fanprnremenl behno using any part of Bie toolof die sameforany ethv
purpose. The word'party Shan be construed as if a read'partfesT when ave-the sense of tfds tffif&ntore so
reqidres.
IN tVJTNESS WHEREOF,lha party of the first part has duly executed (his deed Die day and year first above
wrfitea
IN PRESENCE OF:
SAMUEL W.COHEN
SCHEDULE A-1
FRANCES COHEN
FwwaOOl-BiiBibaiid 6ai»0««4.«ilhCM«iwi vs^^Orwlerancti-UnllVnnAdtnoMVCSfflMt
Schedule A Oescription
Tllte Number At2387K
Page 1
SCHEDULE A-1
13
TO BE USED qtfLV WHgM THE ACKMOWUEQBWEWTIS MACE M NEW YORK STATE
Stale of New York,County ef SBto of Now Yeik,Coumyof
fWaiyPobaoSWorfW
NotOiKSootta
—— QuaSSodtntOnfiaCounty
Coflxn.Cifftet
TO Be NSettONtY WHEN THE ACKKOWkEOCMEIIT IS MAQg CtnstOg NEW YOftK STATS
peraOfiaOy known to ms or ptovod to me on the baste cl satofactoiy evidaaca to be the (ndivtdualto) wtiose Rai!t«(a} is(ere)
sutnetCbad to tho within InslRRMntend odtniMtsdosd to mo dialtnAbeWiey eaonted tinsameto tdsfhorftltocr cspacfiyOos).and
that by Idsfhodlh^ ottpiatufefs)on the(ASiwRicfit. ttw lndMduat(sX or too pesen upon behsTof whlcb Uio {(KMdtBlts)adad.
onoitod the bistrumenb and Cutsuch(iidMdbsl msdo such sppoaones beltoaiko undoislQaad to the
(itsrBttuoeitoetflmtobdMiiuutaUnpadtnsvdeiteRte'iU
SECTION:21
BLOCK: 7026
LOT;S3
COUNTY OR TOWN: KMGS
STREET ADDRESS: 4Z-24ATLANTtC AVENUE
Bargain and Sale Deed BROOKLYN.NEW YORK
wmtCOVEMAMT AtSAlKSTtSRAHTOR'S ACTS
THIoNo. AL23e7K
RgTltRMBY.MAlLTQ:
STNteMnroRMOviawveiiKMMtoOi'niuuKsotWRnots
FRANQSXTUZIO.ESQ.
Dttfefiwlod by
741218™ AVENUE
Commonwealth BROOKLYN.NEW YORR 11204
ibaObaMkAMM
SCHEDULE A-1
Schedule B - Defendants
15
Schedule C - Defendants
16
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF ERIE )SS.:
That the reason tlus verification is made by your deponent instead ofthe Plaintiffis because the Plaintiff
does not reside or have an office for the conduct of business within the County of Erie, which is the County where
your deponent has his office.
By:
Michael J. Wrona, Esq
LISA M. WILLIAMS
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF NEW YORK
OUALIFIED IN NIAGARA COUNTY
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 8/26/20_\£)
17
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
COUNSELORS: ^
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,that upon the annexed affidavit of MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,Pro Se,
affirmed to the day ofJanuary,2010,an upon all the pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein,
the undersigned will move before this Coun at an IAS Part 8,room 438,at the Courthouse located at 360
Adams Street, Brooklyn,New York on the day of .2010 at 9:30 a.in. in the forenoon of
that day or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard:
For an order pursuant to CPLR 3211(a), dismissing the complaint herein on the grounds that: Plruntiff
has no legal capacity to sue,it fails to state a cause ofaction and complaint was not properly served; and
for such other and further reliefas to this Court may seem just and proper.
The above-entitled action is foreclosure. This action is not on the trial calendar.
TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Section 2214(b)ofthe Civil Practice Law and Rules,
all answenng papers,ifany,shall be served at least seven(7)days before the return date ofthis motion.
Dated: Brooklyn,New York
January 25,2010
Michael Krichevsky,Pro Se
4221Atlantic Ave •
Brooklyn,New York 11224
(718)687-2300
STEVEN J. BAUM,P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
220 Northpointe Parkway, Suite G
Buffalo,New Yoik 14228
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
3. The Court lacks personaljurisdiction over the Defendant due to Plaintiffs failure to serve process in
accordance with Section 308 ofthe Civil Practice Law and Rules. Plaintiff did not send debt validation
letter, did not comply with requirements ofParagraphs 1303 and 1304 ofRPAPL.Plaintiff's affidavits of
service (Exhibit A)constitute SEWER SERVICE.The address of89 Fairview Avenue,New York,New
York is not single-family house without an apartment number as it misleadingly appears from affidavit,
but apartment building where Defendant(a) did not reside as claimed by process server Robert
Winckelraann; and(b)there is no John Krichevsky in Defendants family either. This proves(he process
server did not go to this location and made up facts in this affidavit. Ifcopy ofthe complaint really mailed
at this address-it would be undeliverable. The second Affidavit by Jeffiy Conocchioli feils to state that
at the time ofservice at the address of4221 Atlantic Ave there was renovation going on and he must have
seen it. There was no defendant's dwelling where he lived with the door where pleadings could be
attached. That, again, proves that process server did not go to that location. Plaintiffknew from
Defendant' conversations with the serxdcer that there is renovation going on. On the other hand,servicer
knew where Defendant worked. What a better piace to serve defendant than place of abode? All ofthe
above makes me think that Plaintiff went out ofits way in order to perform SEWER SERVICE and tried
to obtain a defaultjudgment. Accordingly, defendant demands sanctions for frivolous lawsuit pursuant to
Plaintiff for commencing and maintaining tliis frivolous action and awarding costs, disbursements and
attorneys' fees.
4. The Plaintiffs complaint is so vague and ambiguous that I can not reasonably be required to prepare a
responsive pleadings because the complaint fails to attach any document to identify who or what" US
BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006-F''is; nor can i determine from the Plaintiffs complaint upon what
facts the Plaintiff is claiming to be the real party in interest witli legal capacity to pursue this foreclosure
action on a promissory note which is required by the New York State Law. Plaintiff in Complaint(Exhibit
B)does not affinnatively state when it became the owner of mortgage and note. Nor plaintiff
affirmatively states that it is the owner and holdei- of the mortgage and note. PlaintifFdoes not state whom
I delivered the mortgage and note and who assigned my instruments to them. No assignment, mortgage or
note attached to the complaint either.
5. According to UCC § 3-301 a "person entitled to enforce"' the promissory note, if negotiable, is
limited to:
V Defendaat(s),
Zm
—r
Ci
CO ov
^ O
ta.. *rio
CO f-C
w- "5
■Si'
*EV 50
c
ttoatsnton*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STAlE Or NEW YORR
COUNTY OF KINGS ^
US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-F
^ AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT
Plainliflf,
E
excising defendants. Capital Resources CorporaUon and the John Doe defendants;for an Order
amending,nuncpro time, plaintiffs name to U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee for
Banc of America Funding Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-F and
amend the caption accordingly for an Order amending the Mortgage, nuncpro tune, by adding
the legal description from the deed; and for such other and further relief as to this court may
deem just and proper
13. Due to damage from Hurricane Sandy,this matter was placed on aFEMA hold
from November 28,2012 until March 18,2013.
14. This office has filed simultaneously with the Court tlie required Supplemental
Attorney Affinnation pursuant to the Administrative Order ofthe Chief Adrainistiative Judge of
the Courts AO/431/11 directing plaindfts' counsel in residential Mortgage foreclosure actions
file a supplemental affirmation. A copy is annexed hcrelo as Exhibit "L".
15. On or about July 18,2013,your affiimanl's office received notice ofa status
conference scheduled for August 1.2013. A copy ofthe status conference notice is annexed
hereto as Exhibit
16. Upon informudon and belief, at a status conference on August 1,2013,the Hon.
Lawrence pinportcd to dianiaa this action withow prejudice pursuant to CPLR § 3215(c).
17. Due to an inadverteot error,a truncated version ofplainlifPa name was used when
the Summonsand Complaint was filed. Plaindlfrespectfully requests that the plainttfTs name
>•
be mmcpro tune, to U.S. Bank National Association,as Tnistee for Banc of America
Fnnding Corporation Mortgage Pass-lTirough Cfertilicaws, Series2006-F and that the caption be
accoidingly. Per CPLR § 2001,"at any stags ofan action,including filing ofa...
Summons and Complaint... the Court may pcnnit a mistake, omission, defect or iiregniariiy...
to be oortected (or]... ifa substantiai right ofa party is not prejudiced, the mistake, omission,
defect or irregularity shall be disregarded..
THE COURT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH REQUIRED
PttFmCATFS PRIOR TO DTOMISSING THIS ACHON
18. The q)pellaic Courts have held that a court's power to dismiss a Complaintsua
sponte is to be used sparingly and only in extraordinary circumstances.
Rmmflnuel,83 AD3d 1047,921 NYS2d 320(2d Dcpt 2011);HSBC Bank USA,NA v. Tafaei;,
104 A.D.3d 815,962 N.Y.S-2d 301 (2d Dcpt 2013).
19. Dismissal ofa Complaint for want ofprosecution is not warranted where the court
or a party seeking such reliefdoes not make a written demand of plaintiff to resume prosecutioa
V. Ch^nflTipo Vallev Cpntral School DKst,. 92 A.D.3d 1016,938 N.Y.S.2d 360(3d Dept
2012). A trial court's order directing plaintiff to file a Note ofissue is defective ifit does not
provide the requisite statutory notice as required by CPLR 3216(b)(3).li;see also Pergousova
Lone.37 A.D.3d 645,830 N.Y.S.2d 330(2d Dept 2007);Klevaaskaya v, Khammqva,21
A.D.3d 350,798 N.Y.S.2d 912(2d Dept 2005).
20 CPLR 3216 permits a coint to dismiss an action for wont of prosecution only after
the court or the defendant has served the plaintiff with a written notice demanding that the
plaintiffresume prosecution ofthe action and serve and file a Note ofissue within 90 days after
receipt ofthe demand,and also stating that the failure to comply with the demand wiU serve as
tho basis for a motion to dismiss the action. "Since CPLR 3216 is a legislative creation and not part
ofa court's inherent power, the failure to serve a written notice that conforms to the provisions of
CPLR 3216 is the failure of a condition precedent to dismissal of the action." Wasif v. IChan. 82
A.D.3d 1084, 1085,919 N.Y.S.2d 203,204 (2d Dcpt 2011)(internal citations omitted); sec also
21, A matter will not be dismissed based on a claim of lack of prosecution unless the
party seeking such reliefcan anirmalively demonstrate thai it served a written demand on plaintiff
pursuant to CPLR 3216. Metcalfv.Progressive Ins..33 Misc.3d 1223(A),943N.Y.S.2d 792(Table)
(N.Y.Sup.2011). Moreover,"[i]n the absence ofa 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216,restoring
a ca.se marked inactive is automatic." Andre v. Bonetio Realty Com.,ct al.,32 A.D.3d 973,975,822
N.Y.S.2d 292(2d Dept 2006); Transtcchnoloiiv Corp. v. Board of Assessors ofCounty of Nassau.
21 Ml.sc.3d 215,864 N.Y.S.2d 826(M.Y.Sup. 2008).
22. The conditions precedent to bringiiig a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute
under CPLR 3216 must be complied with strictly." Frank L. Ciminelli Const. Co., Inc. v.
Shore University Hosn.. 18 Misc.3d 1105(A), al *5, 856 N.Y.S.2d 26(Table)(N.Y.Sup. 2007).
One such condition is that the wriilcii demand for a Note ofissue be served by registered or certified
mail. Where there was a failure to servo by registered or certified mail, then the notice is
jurisdictionally defective, prejudicial, and cannot be deemed a mere procedural irregularity.
Carlucci v. Carlucci. 140 A.D.2d 290, 5.27 N.Y.S.2d 540(2nd Dept 1988); 3,C,E.F. Realty Corp.
V. DeVema. 175 A.D.2d 118, 571 N.Y.S.2d 813(2d Dept 1991) ("[TJhe demand for service of a
Note ofissue wasjurisdictioMlly defective, os it was not served by registered or certified mail
and service was not acimowledged, thus resulting in prejudice to a substantial right ofthe
plaintifl")- Jmisdictional defects may no:be disregarded by the Court See Reed v, State of
New York. 147 A.D.2d 767,537 N.Y.S.2d 350(BdDept 1989); Baggett y. New York,
124 A.D^d 969,508 N.Y.S.2d 823(4th Dcpt 1986).
23 Your offinnant's office is not in receipt ofa Notice pursuant to CPLR 3216. As
such,in the absence ofproofthat the Court sent such e notice via registered or certified mail,this
action must be restored to tite calendar.
24. Furthermore,plaintiffis not in receipt or aware ofan Order dismissing this action.
25. Based on the foregoing, it is respectfully submitted that the Plaintiffhas
operated in good faith and has not abandoned this octioa
26. No previous application has been nmae for the relief requested herein.
Kent O. Marici
SUPREME COURT OF TlflE STATE OP NIIW YORK
COUNIY OF KINGS
Index No.: 25477/09
-against-
Defendants.
Sabrina L. Oscar, being duly sworn,deposes and says that I am over 18 years ofage,1 am not a party to the action,
and I reside in New York County in the State of New York. On June 27,2014,1 served a true copy ofthe annexed
REPl.y AFFIRIVUTION
by mailing the same in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in an ofRcial depository of the Federal
Express within the Stale of New York, addressed to the last known address ofthe addressee as indicated below:
Michael Krichevsky
Pro Se Defendant
89 Fairvlcw Avenue
York NY 10040
Sabnina L. Oscar
Notary Public
PAMELA A. WEBSTER
Notary Public, State of New York
NO.0IWE5072915
Qualified in Queens County
Commission Expires February 10,2013
Michael Krichevsky
.A
My eLaw [Logout]
SUPREME COURT
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
KINGS COUNTY
V,
Index Number. 25477/2009
KRICHEVSKY.MICHAEL
Case Status: DISPOSED
ORDEReCOPY
.nCO.T'U CO;
j^ ?ois^c-
eWatch List
Search Again According to court records, the motion was decided as follows:
As to the relief described as: DISCONTINUE ACTION,the motion
is GRANTED SETTLE ORDER ON NOTICE.
htlp://www.elaw.com/daw21/CaseD8tailNYSupreme.aspx?ca8elD=6065040&couRtyCode=23aindex=25477&year='2C09&court=NY 1/1
/**N
Plaintiff,
AFFIRMATION OF
REGULARITY
Defendants.
Pursuant to CPLR 2106,and under penalty of pegury Victoria E. Munian, Esq., aRinns the
following:
1. AfflTmant is an attomey with Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP the attorneys of record for
the plaintiffin the above entitled action.
2. The complaint in this action "wzs filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of
Kings on April 18,2016.
{SI]S960:2}20160296
(5
I ;■• ' • , 5 • ; • . j/;/ ij/: •>' lf:.« \ '■ ■ A
5. Upon infonnation and belief, all of the defendants are of full age, none of the
defendants are of unsound mind and none of the defendants, who have not appeared, are absentees.
6i More than twenty days have elapsed since the due service of the Summons and
Complaint herein upon all of the defendants personally served and more than thirty days have
elapsed since the due service of the summons and complaint herein upon all of the Defendants
served by means other than personal service as appears by the proof of service filed previously, and
attached. That the time of the Defendants to appear, answer or otherwise move, with respect to the
Complaint has not been extended, and that none of the Defendants have answered to the Complaint,
and none of them have appeared in action except Michael Krichevsky, which appeared pro se, and
is requesting service of all papers.
7. Plaintiff has complied with the provisions of RPAPL §§1303 and 1320. As shown
on the Affidavits of Service on file in this action, the Defendants were served with a Summons
containing the notice required under RPAPL §1320 and with the s^aiate notice required under
RPAPL §1303 on colored paper.
8. Plaintiff has complied with the proviaons of RP.APL §§1304 and 1306. Plaintiff
issued the required notice pursuant to RPAPL §1304 on December 22, 2015. Thereafter Plaintiff
made the requisite filing under RPAPL §1306 with the Superintendent of Banks.
9. Plaintiff has complied with the provisions of CPLR §3408. As shown in the
Affirmation of CPLR §3408 Settlement Confeieiice submitted herewith, the required conference
was held on this matter and this matter was ther^er released from the conference to pennit the
Plaintiff to proceed with this foreclosure action. .
10. On December 16,2016, our office conducted a search with the Department of
Defense, Defense Manpower Data Center and confirmed that the Defendant Michael Krichevsky is
not in any branch of the military service on active duty at the present time. Affiant lacks sufficient
information to determine whether the defendants Jane Doe, and Maria Tomkevych are in active military
service.. A copy of the filed Affidavitof Investigator—Non-Military Status is annexed
hereto. On May 23,2017 our office conducted an additional search with the Department of
Defense, Defense Manpower Data Center and confirmed that the Defendant Michael Krichevsky is
not in any branch of the military service on active duty at the present time. Affiant lacks sufficient
infonnation to determine whether the defendants Jane Doe, and Maria Tomkevych are in active milllaiy
service. Said search results are annexed hereto.
11. That no previous application has been made for this or like relief.
12. Upon infoimation and belief there are 2 tenants on the premises who would be
included under the designation John Doe and as is shown on the attached affidavits of service the
actual names are Jane Doe and Maria Tomkevych.
13. Annexed hereto as exhibits are copies of the foUowing documents, vdiich exhibits
are spedfically incpiporaled herein and made a part hereof:
{SI1S360:2 )20160296
A. PlaindiTAffidavitofMerit
a) RPAPL §1304 90 Day Pre-Foreclosure Notice
B. Affidavit ofPossession ofOriginal Note
C. Note
D. Mortgage and an Assignments thereof
E. Notice ofDefault
F. Notice ofPendency
G. Summons and Complaint
H. Certificate of Merit
I. RPAPL §1303 Help for Homeowners Notice
J. Affidavits ofService
K. CPLR §3215 Affidavit ofMailing
L. Rejection ofAnswer
M. Filed Non-Military Affidavit and Search Results dated December 16, 2016 and
Additional Searches dated May 23,2017
N. Requestfor Judicial Intervention
O. SetUement Conference Release Order
P. Pooling and Servicing Agreement
Q. Power of Attomey
14. The undersigned affitms that the foregoing statements are true, under the penalties of
peijuiy.
(a) Appointing a referee to detemune the amount due and ascertain whether the
premises can be sold in parcels;
(b) Adding Jane Doe and Maria Tomkevych,as party defendants to this action in place
of'*John Doe"and amending ofthe caption ofsaid action to reflect same;
Dated:-May 31,2017
amEsq.^
VfCtoria E. Munian,Esq.
Attorneysfor Plaintiff
Woods Oviatt Gilxnan LLP
700 Crossroads Building
2State Street
Rochester,NY 14614
Tel.:(855)227-5072
(SI133602)20160296
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT:COUNTY Of KINGS
MORTGAGED PREMISES:
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK STATC 4221 Allaniic Avenue a/k/a 4219-4221
DEPARTMENT OF TAXADON AND Allaniie Avenue
FINANCE.LWTED STATES OF AMERICA BY Brooklyn,NY 11224
THEINTERNAL REVENTJE SERVICE,CITY
OF NDW YORK PARKING VIOLATIONS
BUREAU,
And JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
I am noi a party lo ihe action,am over 18 years ofage,and reside in Rochester, New
York.
On May ?l Urt . I served a copy ofthe Notice of Motion for Order of Reference
and all relatingdocume^ to the above matter in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid
thereon, in a post office or depository ofthe United Stales Postal Service within the Stale ofNew
York,addressed to the last known address ofthe individuals as indicated below.
TO:
Michael Kiichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn, NY•11224
($115391 )
City ofNew York Parking Violations Bureau
210 Joralemon Street, First Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Jane Doe
4221 Atlantic Avenue,2nd Floor
Brooklyn,NY 11224
Maria Tomkevych
4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn. NY 11224
Clerk
{5II$39]:)
EXHIBIT F
Supreme Court ofNew York
Kings County
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,SERIES 2006F, Affidavit of Truth in
Plaintiff. Opposition to Motion for
Order of Reference
-against-
Michael Krichevsky, Sui Juris, being duly sworn to God.deposes and says:
2. I have first-hand knowledge to make this affidavit in opposition to the within motion for
order of reference and ifcalled as a witness I can competently testify as follows below.
3. In fact,I am the only one amongst people involved in this action with first-hand knowledge
to lawfully sign non-hearsay, admissible affidavit or affirmation without intention to mislead and
without creating peijury and/or fraud on the court As a man. non-member ofthe BAR,I am not
bound by its private membership rules(NY CPLR)designed by the BAR specifically for attorneys
to make profits for themselves who have paid assistants to help them make answers to the
complaint within 20 days; and whosejob is to submit their clients to the jurisdiction ofthe court
without client*s informed knowledge and consent. I do not submit to jurisdiction ofthis court.
4. Now,I demand Woody Dorsonne's surety bond from Attorney who hired him.
Good faith, non-frivoloiis Notice and Affidavit of Negative Averments in opposition to
affirmation of regularity by Victoria E, Munian,Esq., together with her supervisors, other
presumed readers or proof-readers of her affirmation
Notice To Opponents/Libellees
Notice: It is a felony to knowingly file forged or false instruments in City Register and
especially the court.
5. To demonstrate this law,read what happens in real life, which described in Merin v. City of
'The essential facts underlying the complaint are not in dispute. Plaintiff is the
owner ofa private home located at 226-08 141st Avenue in Queens County. She
obtained title to the property as sole heir and devisee ofthe estate ofone Ida
Hershman. On March 6,2014,one Darrell Beatty filed a fraudulent Real Property
Transfer Report with the City Register indicating a sale ofthe property in 2013 to
him from one Edith Moore and on March 20,2014 filed a fraudulent deed with the
City Register. Thereafier. Beatty broke into the home,changed the locks and took
up residency. Upon going to the home to inspect it, plaintiff discovered that the
locks had been changed and she called the police to report a burglary. When the
NYPD arrived, Beatty, who was present at the premises, produced the fraudulent
deed,and the officers refused to arrest Beatt)' for burglary and lefi.'"
6. I am alarmed,outraged and believe that alleged plaintiffand its alleged attorney are putting
evidence on the record or first-hand knowledge that Victoria E. Munian,Esq., and as employee of
WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP., has any authority to represent Plaintiffin this action. In fact,
I claim that the Plaintiffin caption above does not exist even as a legal fiction because several
month ago, I demanded identifying information from Victoria E. Munian, Esq. to verify the
existence ofsuch Plaintiffand her lawful authority to represent it, but did not receive it.
«?■-
8. 1 infer that she failed and ignored my demands because she had sufficient time to produce
such information. However, 1 did not receive anything from her to satisfy these demands, nor did 1
9. As such, I am alarmed, outraged and infer that she has/had nothing to give me to satisfy my
demands and could not lawfully object by stating any ground for objection in order not to
10. Had she acknowledged these demands on the record and objected, she knows, she would
have created a record for appeal and of her personal fraud and deceit. This in turn would be an
evidence guilty knowledge and mens t ea. Therefore, I infer that she willfully and knowingly
went silent to my demands to disclose identity and authority to represent alleged Plaintiff in order
to appear only negligent or only incompetent attorney to avoid possible criminal prosecution.
incorporate by reference herein, I demanded that she cease and desist her illegal action, but
received no objection or affirmative explanation why I am wrong and why she would continue.
12. Cunent Plaintiff s attorney, Victoria E. Munian. Esq., writes in the certificate of merit:
"1.1 am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of New York, and
am affiliated with the law firm of Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP, attorney for plaintiff
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Banc of America Funding
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-F in this action."
13. She further writes:"On April 6. 2016 I consulted about the facts ofthis case with the
14. Prior to producing my answer with counterclaim, in good faith. I called Victoria E.
Munian. Esq. at her office and attempted to inform her about the history of prior fraudulent
litigation, its outcome and about other issues 1 raised herein. After a few minutes into our
conversation, she abruptly ended it aher I started talking about plaintiffs identity.
15. On March 1,2017.1 called WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. and asked receptionist for
information about US Bank. No one could find any information such as name, mailing address or
16. Another staff member directed me to call Wells Fargo at 800-416-1472. No one at this
number was able to help me and worker there directed me to call Wells Fargo at 866-234-8271. No
one at that number would identify Plaintiff and give me any contact information.
17. Based on the foregoing, 1 aver that U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,SERIES 2006F does not exist, and therefore demand its
articles of organization or formation together with information from the federal territory or state
18. In addition, 1 conclude that some shadow entity, I cal Interloper, together with attorneys
conspired and knowingly engaged in criminal fraud, harassment and plunder of Falsely Accused's
SERIES 2006F" is as named plaintiff on the caption ofthis complaint? This plaintiffs name is
gibberish called "DOG-LATIN:The Latin of illiterate persons: Latin words put together on the
English grammatical system"- Black's Law Dictionary 4" Edition(page 569). It is an old trick
known to our Founding Fathers. From letter of Thomas Jefferson to John Adams:
"I had supposed them defunct with the society of Jesuits, of which they were: and
that their works,although above ground, were, from their bulk and insignificance,
as effectually entombed on their shelves,as if in the graves of their authors.
Fiffy-two volumes in folio, of the acta sanctorum, in dog-Latin, would be a
formidable enterprise to the most laborious German."
VISCERATEXTUS. 11 Coke.34. It is a poisonous gloss which corrupts the essence ofthe text."-
Black's Law" Dictionary 4"^ Edition (page 820). It looksjust like English, but grammatically is
wrong, upper case styled Dog-Latin foreign text.
21. Attorneys knowingly violated maxim of law: Propreietates verborum servandae sunt-the
2006F,is DOG - LATIN,which means nothing in the English Grammar language. Victoria E.
Munian,Esq. is aware ofthis as I notified her ofthis misconduct in my answer with counterclaim
and cross-motion. To add more insult to the injury, instead ofamending her complaint,she
rejected my answer with counterclaim without stating that her alleged client asjuristic person was
23^ surprised and/or prejudiced by my iate answer.
24. Thereafter, she rushed intojudgment by filing motion for order ofreference.
25. She knows, had she alleged said surprise or prejudice to dead legal person,she would look
like mentally incompetent attorney. Hence. Victoria E. Munian, Esq. chose to ignore my objection
26. In my affidavit for cross-motion, 1 referred Victoria E. Munian, Esq. to the Chicago
Manual of Style to show her DOG-LATIN deceit. No reaction followed and she did not cease and
desist. This time, I refer her to New York Style Manual copywrited by the New York State Unified
Court System. She as New York attorney must follow it. In it, there is no occasion where legal
Argument: It is a felony to knowingly file forged or false documents with any public office,
especially the court in order to sue for money.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE-alleged fictitious plaintiff, nor did I ever have any
contract or trustee agreement,or nexus with falsely implied trust with self-contradictory corporate,
CERTIFICATES,SERIES 2006F" because it is just some dead pieces of paper, and therefore I
2009 foreclosure case against me. Again,case was abandoned and subsequently dismissed (see my
answer with counter-claim and affidavit for cross-motion for details). Today, Victoria E. Munian,
Esq. continues repeating said anecdote. She. being duly sworn,essentially states that she,as
acting as trustee, who in turn(as trustee), re-presents another corporation acting as trust. And,that
these trustee and trust are serving some numbered pieces of paper as beneficiaries. This is
absurdity and Munian is aware ofthis fraud. Evidently,said alleged corporation is not the lawful
trust by legal definitions ofcorporation and/or trust, which alleged Plaintiff falsely claims to
represent us trustee. Indeed,ajuristic fiction can be a trust as'juristic person,' but fiction cannot be
alive trustee because it is dead, fictitious entity. It has no brain. It cannot walk and talk or sign
documents- only man or woman can swear an oath oftrustee and sign a document. Admittedly by
trustee, hence this is the reason she stubbornly refuses to produce trustee's identity and/or
registration(government issued photo IDs) because ID does not exist. She then continues her
deceit by implying that plaintiff(non-existent entity) hired her law firm to re-present alive trustee
in this court.
29. Everyone involved against me knows or should have known as professional that the
caption ofa case is not the place where attorney would plead identity, legal status and standing of
plaintiffand defendant,especially using GLOSSA and DOG-LATIN. There is a place within the
body oftext ofthe complaint headlined PARTIES where attomey must plead such elements of
jurisdiction and joinder. Instant complaint is disgrace for WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP.,
who claims to be the law firm ofSupper Lawyers. Because ofthat and because ofstubbom refusal
to correct its pleading, 1 rule out professional incompetence in pleading and infer crimes against
the public, the court and me offraud upon the court by officers ofthe same court.
30. As such, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP violated my right to privacy and to be left
alone-free from harassment and plunder of property. On the other hand, I have a right to treat this
action as frivolous, fraudulent'smoke and mirrors' action fabricated by attorneys involved, who
31. If I cut through the clutter of'smoke and mirrors' oftrustee and trust, the court and 1 would
arrive at the following ridiculous conclusion: some dead pieces of paper make or have a claim
against alive man for money or for man's house. Based on the foregoing, 1 was never in alleged by
Victoria E. Munian, Esq. default with my answer. Furthermore, Judge Noah Dear, who knows of
this fraud, lacks authority and jurisdiction to perform any act other than the sua sponte minisierial
act of dismissal ofthis foreclosure action per your own BAR's CPLR §3211 (a),(2),(3).(5),(7),
(8); and dismiss the action upon the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, misconduct and due to
Argument: Because alleged Plaintiff-trustee and implied trust as juristic persons, both do
not exist in reality as a matter oflaw,and interloper is stubbornly hiding behind them,none
of them can allege and prove damages without exposing criminal scheme of all involved to
get my house *for free.^
32. For more than 10 years, 1 have unchallenged possession of my property. In addition, 1 have
verifiable private claim and lien on the house and land of at least $1,000,000 from my 40IK
retirement fund together with other funds and sweat equity 1 have invested in construction and
renovation of my properly after two hurricanes in 2008 and 2012. Now,comes along some
third-party, undisclosed criminal interloper(s), who is hiding behind attorneys as front and all are
trying to manipulate and use this court to defraud me and get my house *for free' as in detail shown
in Merin v. City ofNew York above. This is so because as evidenced in this complaint, the pleader
by attorney (third-party undisclosed interloper) never alleged any damages or financial loss as the
result of my alleged breach, which breach 1 deny,denied in my answer with counterclaim and in
omnibus cross-motion. The pleader deceitfully attempts to imply damages,and therefore a right to
foreclose. Alternatively, pleader expects that this court presume pleader's interest or investment in
33. Fact, nowhere in the instant complaint, has the pleader alleged and/or verified by
signature that I have received a loan, money,cash,check or other valuable consideration for
34. Had the pleader expressly claimed any of these elements ofcause ofaction, the pleader
would have to come forward with verifiable proofofclaim by man or woman on the record in
35. Attomeys andjudges are well aware from law school courses ofsuch requirement to
sustain cognizable controversy: no damages- no legal action or subject matter to adjudicate. This
is why damages only implied by the pleader's attorney, Victoria E. Munian, Esq., in order not to
alert me,non-bar member,sued herein to such important element ofany cause of action. Lack of
these elements therefore, would be the affirmative defenses of lack ofconsideration or duty to
perform. Any stranger can allege that I am in contract with that stranger and produce a fake
contract. But,and it is a big BUT.stranger cannot show the court a proofofclaim. See H 4 ofthis
36. Because attomeys, who concocted this action,as officers ofthe court, failed in assisting
this court in its truth finding function, this court lost its presumed personal and subject matter
jurisdiction ofthe case and case must be dismissed with prejudice for, among other things, failure
to state a claim per own BARs CPLR §3211 (a),(2),(3).(5),(7),(8); and dismiss the action upon
the grounds ofcriminal fraud, misrepresentation, misconduct and due to attempted fraud upon the
37. As to H 2:1 have no first-hand knowledge to admit or deny this allegation. 1 have no idea as
to attorneys' expectation to how many times this court would violate the law and allow plaintiff
willfully change dates ofcalling its alleged debt due and owning. Apparently,attomeys expect that
they would not be sanctioned for willfully changing those dales and starting numerous vexatious
litigations. According to law ofdoctrine of Judicial Estoppels and Estoppels by Latches, plaintiff
cannot change these dates even one time. This is excerpt from alleged plaintifTs US BANK 2009
foreclosure complaint against me, which is a matter of public record and infonnation (notice the
DOG-LATIN style of my name, which is in reality not my sui juris name, but rather capitis
diminutio maxima:
38. If I presume that the date of filing of this complaint is true, this complaint must be
dismissed with prejudice per BAR's own CPLR §3211 (a)(5)as six-year statute oflimitation
expired in 2015 when alleged plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its action (in silent admission of fake
mortgage and note),thereby creating Estoppels by Latches(see my answer with counterclaim and
mortgage in 2009 and/or other papers, on which attorneys relied in 2009 and rely in this action
today.
40. I have no evidence, knowledge or logical explanation from anybody involved as to the
lawful purpose ofcorrecting assignment made in 2009.1 have no obligation to guess what was
wrong with it then or now,and why in 2013 it required correction. I can only suspect some
undisclosed evil motive to cause me harm. In fact, I have first-hand knowledge that papers filed in
this action are fake,just like fake news by mainstream media. Therefore,I deny and object to these
compounded allegations as fraud upon the court by officers ofthe same court. Particularly, I am
offended and deny Victoria E. Munian's. Esq. bearing false witness- unlawfully swom,hearsay
mortgage(attached to her motion)since she did not witness alleged act ofsigning it by myself.
She,as attorney, is testifying about matters beyond her personal knowledge and therefore lacks
competence to testify. Because ofthat, I have noticed her for deposition in this court on November
13,2017 in order to put her under oath so 1 may cross-examine her as to the source of her
knowledge and whether she spoke to the man or woman who saw me signing that mortgage and/or
note.
41. She did not appear on November 13,2017 in this court to argue her motion even though she
wrote and signed it, and in notice of motion stated that she will move the court. Upon information
and belief,she resides in Rochester, New York. This would be about 8 hours drive to New York.
As such,I conclude that she never intended to appear in this court and move it, which is fraud upon
the court by officer ofthe same court. Accordingly, her motion for reference must be stricken.
42. As oftoday,she did not withdraw her affirmation in support oforder of reference, as her
43. As oftoday, I have received no objection to the deposition from her. Now I conclude that
she is in contempt ofcourt. According to maxim oflaw: external actions reveal internal motive, 1
conclude that she is acting in bad faith and has guilty knowledge ofher personal crimes against the
44. Because ofthe foregoing, I object to her continuing contempt ofcourt and deceit by
implying that somebody with authority to assign the mortgage did lawfully assign it on August 25,
2009 and recorded in City Register. I contend that said assignment was made by interloper for the
some interloper made in 2013 can undo fraud and damage done by illegal or unlawful assignment
by other interloper made in 2009. Again,see ^4 above ofthis negative averment affidavit as
rebuttal ofpresumptions ofcredibility, legality and authority to assign and record anything in City
Register. Again,cited Merin v. City ofNew York case law conclusively shows that act offiling
documents in City Register, can be made by interloper and that City Register does not verify
legality ofcontent offilings. The case also shows that act of filing papers in City Register is not an
evidence of authority and legality to act and file. However, it does show and create the fact, albeit
undisclosed, that whoever filed and/or directed creation of corrective assignment in 2013 knew
something that 2009 assignment was not legal and/or lawful, hence the 'correction* as smoke and
mirrors to cover up fraud upon the court in 2009 and in present. Based on the foregoing Corrective
Assignment must be stricken as unlawful and void.
Argument: Act offiling Corrective Assignment in City Register and pleading this fact in this
affirmation is another *smoke and mirrors' by attorneys, which fact is evidentiary irrelevant
since the fact offiling does not tend to prove the alleged default or authority to foreclose,
unless it is an evidence creating undisclosed presumption against me,which would be
another instance offraud upon the court by officers of the same court
46. I have no evidence or knowledge as to why Victoria £. Munian, Esq. in her affirmation of
regularity stresses the fact ofrecording said corrective assignment in City Register. I have no
control ofCity Register. City Register is used to publicly register ownership or liens. However,the
City Register does not determine whether the filing or correction document is lawful or authorized.
As such,I contend that whatever was filed in City Register without my knowledge and consent
does not create presumption or prove that I knew about or approved these filing. I contend that
these filings do not conclusively bind my property or me to this lawsuit. These filings, including
notice of pendency,constitute an intention and act to cloud the title on my property with the goal to
damage my ability to use it as collateral for any of possible business activity. Accordingly,1 have a
claim against attorneys who performed this tort. 1 challenge Victoria E. Munian,Esq.to inform me
and explain why this act of filing notice of pendency in City Register is materially relevant
evidence of my liability in this foreclosure action; and how it will lawfully help her get my
property 'for free.' I will wait for a reasonable time for that particular reply in order to amend or
supplement this affidavit. If nothing follows. I will move to strike this ^ 3 of her affirmation of
47. Furthermore I repeat, due to law enforcing authorities uncovered fraud upon the court by
Steven J. Baum,P.C,2009 action was consequently abandoned due to their admission ofevidence
fabrication and other wrongdoing. 1 repeat,just because some interloper, who tum out to be an
give the authority to foreclose. These assignments do not automatically prove or act as an
officers ofthe court hand a duty ofdue diligence to read my answer with counter-claim. There, 1
notify them about fake documents that they used to start this action. I expected that somebody
from WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. will contact and interview me since I made very serious
averments of criminal fraud and forgery by their alleged client. 1 expected that they would file a
motion to stay this proceeding or refrain from moving in any way,and instead attempt to
investigate my contention as this is for their benefit and it is their fiduciary duties as officers ofthe
49. Presumably, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. did not concoct the AFFIDAVIT OF
one Jeremiah Herberg from South Carolina. In my opinion, the affidavit is compound, vague and
evasive by design, and therefore does not qualify as affidavit with first-hand knowledge. The
maxims oflaw are very clear on how ambiguity destroys legal certainty. Therefore,said affidavit
50. Because, presumably, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP were not present when Herberg
did his work on that affidavit, I expected that WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. would contact
him, meticulously try to investigate this matter and, in good faith, get back to me with their
York 2013 involving banks, loans, conspiring attorneys, inferences offraud, wire fraud, forged
signatures, fake assignment and promissory note used to defraud a person. There 1 read:
'it is sufficient to come within the exception that the client intended to use the
attorney's services in furtherance of a crime or fraud even if the attomey was
unaware ofthis purpose. See Clark,289 U.S. at 15("The attomey may be innocent,
and still the guilty client must let the truth come out.")(citing cases); Shahinian v.
Tankian,242 F.R.D.255,258(S.D.N.Y.2007)("It is not necessar>'to show that the
attomey was aware ofthe improper purpose.")(citing In re Grand Jury Subpoena
Duces Tecum Dated Sept. 15,1983.731 F.2d at 1038);S.E.C, v. Herman,2004 WL
964104, at *2(S.D.N.Y. May 5,2004)("The pertinent intent is that ofthe client,
not the attorney.")(citations omitted). Moreover,the crime or fraud for which the
client used the attorney's services need not be the subject ofthe underlying"
lawsuit. See generally Antidote Infl Films, Inc. v. Bloomsbury Publ'g, PLC,242
F.R.D. 248,250-51 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
"A person commits forgery "when, with intent to defraud, deceive or injure
another, he falsely makes,completes or alters a written instrument." N.Y. Penal
Law § 170.05.[5]"In essence, the crime offorgery involves the making,altering,or
completing ofan instrument by someone other than the ostensible maker or drawer
or an agent ofthe ostensible maker or drawer." People v. Levitan,49 N.Y.2d 87,90
(1980). As a general rule, "there can be a forgery only ifthe actor is not the
ostensible maker or drawer ofthe instrument and is not authorized by that person to
either make,complete or alter the instrument." Id. at 91."
53. After reading it and in conclusion. 1 have become alarmed, outraged and suspicious
because 1 have received no reaction to my answer with counterclaim dated March 3,2017,except
quick rejection of my answer and counterclaim dated March 17,2017. The notice ofrejection
stated that the ground for rejection is untimely answer. No mention that they investigated my claim
offraud and forgery by their client. Evidently, they chose some procedural technicality of
untimely answer as very important fact for the court to judicially notice versus the fact of possible
crimes against the public, the court and me by their client. So, 1 infer per AMUSEMENT
INDUSTRY, INC v. Stern that WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP's intention is to "see no evil"
and create "blissful ignorance and/or plausible deniability" of ultimate facts ofthis case. It is
axiomatic that investigation could expose and prevent them from getting my "house for free."
54. Based on the above. I conclude that they knowingly use fake documents in this case, and
55. In fact, I have received no reply from Victoria E. Munian, Esq. or from any employee of
WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. directly rebutting point for point my averments that mortgage
and note arc fake and forgeries. The only reply mentioning these forgeries is in Munian's REPLY
Exhibit B. This afHrmation is also defective since there is no affidavit in support of her
affirmation from officer ofalleged plaintiff, on which she can base her argument of whether the
56. I have received no sworn statement from independent forensic expert that mortgage and
note are not forged, altered or redacted. Her attorney-coworker's certification is inadmissible
explains attorney's deceit by stating: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the
disqualifled from this case by operation of law due to conflict of interest and violation of BAR's
own NYRPC ADVOCATE-WITNESS rule and this court should not proceed any further.
57. To add more insult to the injury, in above said affirmation. Munian makes logically
fallacious 'straw man' false and misleading statements of her own creation. I did not make a
statement in the way she writes or interprets my affidavits. Based on her statements she creates the
'straw man' arguments. Then,she conveniently begins to rebut her own statements and arguments
below:
*'9. The Defendant alleges that the prior note that he inspected is not the same as the one he
inspected during the prior action,[gibberish]
10. Even though the Defendant waived any standing argument by failing to timely appear
in this action, the argument is still without merit as attached to Plaintiffs Complaint as
Exhibit C is an attomey certified copy ofthe note, which is evidence that the properly
endorsed note was in possession ofPlaintiff prior to commencement.Nationstar Mtg.,LLC
v. Catizone, 127 AD3d 1151,1152 (2"*^ Dep't2015)."[comment is mine]
58. In this reply, H 9 is false because in my answer with counter-claim and affidavit for my
cross-motion, I averred with prolonged particularity that the signature on the purported original
note produced by non-existent plaintiffin prior action, which 1 have examined in open court, was
not my authorized signature. 1 said in court that most likely that was rather robo-signature made by
59. In addition, I averred that the note in endorsement area had the sign ofalteration or
redaction by using "'white out"" substance sold in stores. Altered endorsement area would be
'material alteration.' Needless to say. that would be considered as an attempt to cover up some
wrongdoing, which would be the reason why by operation oflaw the note is void as is. Every
reasonable person knows that no bank would honor a check that has"white out"alteration area on
endorsement. Accordingly, Munian failed to rebut point for point these sworn averments she
misleadingly call 'allegations' to diminish significance ofthose facts. Nowhere has she mentioned
'white out.'
60. In addition,among other things, 1 averred with particularity that all assignments,including
corrective assignment were not authorized,and therefore are null and void for fraud upon the court
by officers ofthe same court(see my affidavit for cross-motion for details). I averred that
self-serving attorney's hearsay certification is not the evidence of note's authenticity, but rather
61. 1 also attacked discrepancies and gaps between stamps and signatures on purported original
note I have examined in prior dismissed action and the copy of purported original note attached to
this complaint and motion since there can be no two 'originaf notes that I allegedly signed.
Alternatively, if plaintiff claims that it is in possession ofthe two original notes I signed for the
same loan, it must be stated clearly on the record or at least one note is a forgery in plaintiffs
possession.
62. Munian did not rebut these issues point for point as well.
63. As such, 1 aver that 1 have received no rebuttal or logical explanation Irom any attorney as
to why altered by 'white out' or redacted by 'blacked out' notes used by them in the lawsuits is/are
not void by operation oflaw and why these averments are false or erroneous. According to maxim
of law: silence is acquiescence, these averments are deemed admitted into evidence by operation
oflaw, see Kuehne & Nagel v. Baiden^ 36 NY 2d 539 - NY Court of Appeals(1975)where the
court stated:
"Facts appearing in the movant's papers which the opposing party does not
controvert, may be deemed to be admitted"
64. Now,Judge Noah Dear should make silentjudicial notice of attomey's admissions that
they knowingly used promissory note and other documents with material alterations to start this
lawsuit.
65. K 10 is also false because I never waived my defense of lack ofstanding neither in my
Argument: Alleged plaintiff and its alleged attorney did not comply with BAR^s own CPLR
§ 3215(f), and therefore motion for order of reference must be denied as defective
66. Below is Kings County Supreme Court beloved Judge Shack's order(Index No.
15968/07), which literally depicts situation in the instant action. This order brilliantly exposes the
PlaintifiTs application, upon the default of all defendants,for an order of reference,for the
premises located at 572 Riverdale Avenue, Brooklyn, New York (Block 3838, Lot 39,County of
Kings) is denied without prejudice. The "affidavit of merit" submitted in support ofthis
application for a defaultjudgment is not by an officer of the plaintiff or someone with a power of
attorney from the plaintiff.
Leave is granted to plaintiff, l-ISBC BANK USA,N.A., AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR THE
REGISTERED NOTEHOLDERS OF RENAISSANCE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-3,
RENAISSANCE HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET-BACKED NOTES,SERIES 2005-3(HSBC),
to renew its application for an order ofreference upon presentation to the Court ofcompliance with
the statutory requirements of CPLR § 3215(0» with "an affidavit offacts" executed by someone
who is an officer of HSBC or has a valid power of attorney from HSBC. Further, the Court, upon
renewal ofthe application for an order ofreference requires a satisfactory explanation to questions
with respect to: the assignment ofthe instant nonperforming mortgage loan from the original
lender. Delta Funding Corporation to HSBC Bank;the employment history ofone Scot Anderson,
who assigned the instant mortgage to HSBC,yet in a case I decided last month,HSBC Bank,N .A.
V. Cherry, 18 Misc.3d 1102(A),swore in an affidavit to be HSBC's servicing agent; and the
relationship between HSBC,Owen Federal Bank, FSB(OCWEN),Deutsche Bank and Goldman
Sachs, who all seem to share office space at 1661 Worthington Road,Suite ICQ, West Palm Beach,
Florida 33409(Suite 100)."
67. I have no verified complaint from US BANK.There is no affidavit offact per CPLR §
3215(f), attached to this motion from an officer or employee of US BANK,on which this
exist.
eloquently explains continued attorney's attempt to manipulate the court and defraud opponent:
70. As such, this motion is defective by operation oflaw and must be denied.
71. As to 4 and 5: they are full of legal and/or medical conclusions, to which I have no duty
to start demagogy.
72. As to 6 and 7:1 generally deny all these compound allegations. In my notice of Special
Appearance Under Duress and the cross-motion, I specifically denied personal service upon me
and rebutted affidavits of service by process server. I also moved the court to set the traverse
hearing where I intend to impeach the process server in front ofthe jury oftwelve. Accordingly,
this will be a Spiritual Court where 12 Apostles and God will judge.
73. I deny that I appear pro se. I am aware that if I accept this title as my standing, BAR's
definition 'pro se' secretly presumes that I submitted to jurisdiction ofthis court as an attorney or
juristic person admitted to re-present the man, Michael Krichevsky as ward ofthe Roman court per
standing, I am here as man,Sui Juris under God,and no one rebutted this status and standing. In
God,I Trust.
74. As to ^ 8:1 deny compounded allegations in this paragraph as vague and possibly
misleading as I cannot be compelled to guess and rebut all possible hypothetical allegations.
Attorney's Exhibit A in support ofH 8 in her affirmation of regularity is incomplete, false and/or
misleading for the following reasons. Her exhibit depicts or implies that a certified letter with
return receipt requested was mailed to me through USPS. Attorney believes that this should create
a presumption that 1 received such notice and would act on it. In rebuttal, 1 point out attempted
deceit by Munian. She does not attach the paid and stamped dated receipt from Postal Service
showing the date,name and address ofthe addressee,which any prudent person keeps as a proofof
mailing,or even electronic receipt with similar information, which would be the easiest way for
her to back up her testimony. I am sure that Munian every year sends or used to send her income
tax returns by certified mail and kept those receipts of mailing addressed to IRS. Accordingly, this
exhibit does not identify me as addressee or that the sender is Wells Fargo. In addition, there is no
so-called Green postcard showing that 1 signed and received this certified mail from Wells Fargo,
although writing on that exhibit states * RETURN RECIPT REQUESTED.' I believe that such
document does not exist. The attached letter from Wells Fargo is without tracking number
connecting exhibit's certified mailing trucking number to the 90-day notice letter, which brings an
infinite number of possibilities such as a letter with force placed insurance or just a Photo Shop
fabrication, for which Wells Fargo is notorious. Accordingly, Munian's attempt to prove by
admissible evidence that 90-day notice was timely sent or if it was sent to me at all failed.
Noticeably, for unknown to me reason loan number on this letter is redacted (blacked out). In
addition to this redaction, all attorney's Exhibits contain alteration or redaction ofevery
identifying number on exhibits. These facts lead me to infer that somebody is hiding some material
fact(s), which would be helpful to my defense or which would impeach the attached evidence itself
as fake.
75. Based on the foregoing, I rebutted attorney's misleading the court testimony that alleged
Plaintiffcomplied with RPAPL §1304 - statutory precedent requirement to start foreclosure and
give jurisdiction to this court. Accordingly, Judge Noah Dear lacks authority and jurisdiction to
perform any act other than the sua sponie ministerial act ofdismissal of this foreclosure action per
77. As to H 11: Victoria E. Munian.Esq. perjured herself by stating that no previous application
has been made for this or like relief. In my affidavit for cross-motion, I explained in greater detail
why the statement is perjurious. I refer to the T| 26 and continuing further down ofthis affidavit for
greater explanation with exhibits. Her argument in opposition that fraud upon the court by her
alleged client is moot because of its voluntary dismissal of prior action is meritless and frivolous.
This case is still a matter of public record and her client is bound by its documentary evidence and
judicial admissions in court. However, Munian does admits and acknowledges her personal
knowledge of her client's prior wrongdoing, but refuses to decline representation in violation of
waste of court's resources and waste of my time and energy to start rebuttal ofhypothetical
cross-examination.
Argument: The choice of applicable law for this motion for order of reference and default
judgment is summary judgment standard, which make this motion is premature especially
because the court cannot proceed when jurisdiction is challenged.
79. I challenged jurisdiction ofthis court and plaintiffs attorney ignored my challenge. 1
noticed Victoria E. Munian,Esq. and her law firm with 4 notices for deposition and interrogatory
(Exhibit C)in order to obtain requested information through discovery. As ofthe time ofcurrent
writing, nobody appeared and 1 have received no information, reply or objection from anybody
involved. We have here unidentified plaintiff while its attorney commits misconduct by rebjsal to
identify it. As such,this motion must be denied as plaintiffs attorney engaged in stalling
discovery.
80. In conclusion "Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
to:
"embrace that species offraud which does,or attempts to, defile the court itself, or
is a fraud perpetrated by officers ofthe court so that the judicial machinery cannot
perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented
for adjudication." Kenner v. CJ.R., 387 F,3d 689(1968); 7 Moore's Federal
Practice, 2d ed., p. 512,f60.23.
81. The purpose of this affidavit is to create a record of detailed knowledge by all involved
against me.This knowledge consists of major legal defects or crimes, which take away jurisdiction
ofthis court. These major legal defects in criminal court can take away Plausible Deniability
82. 1 would address all claims, arguments and evidence made by man or woman against my
property and me,provided the accuser would file undertaking surety bond for $2,500,000 in this
court.
or mistaking by any or all involved, I would accept objections and/or explanations and
promise to amend or withdraw them if made in good faith. However,if in reply to this
affidavit I would receive just silence, unresponsiveness or continued harassment,1 would
presume that I am correct and would act accordingly. Please,take notice that my time,
aggravation and other damages due to continuing litigation would be further valued and
billed at $500 per hour as express self-executing contract with wrongdoer(s)as valuable
WHEREFORE,I respectfully move this court for an order denying this motion for order of
reference in its entirety, and for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem just and
proper.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ALICE ASHER
NOTARY PUBLIC,Stale of New York
N0.01AS6D62200
Qualllled in Kings County
Commission Expires 07/30/2021
EXHIBIT G
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
Defendant(s).
1. That affirmant is an associate with Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP the attorneys of
record for the plaintiff in the above entitled action. As such, I am fully familiar
3. The procedural and factual background of the instant case is set forth in the
15572478: )20160296
5. Accordingly,Plaintiifrequests that the Defendant's opposition be denied and that
ARGUMENT
6. The defendant alleges that his default should be vacated as he was not properly
served.
7. It should be noted that no default has been entered to date as Plaintiffs application
8. Next, Defendant's reference to the prior action are moot and should be disregarded
9. The Defendant alleges that the prior note that he inspected is not the same as the one
10. Even though the Defendant waived any standing argument by failing to timely
appear in this action, the argument is still without merit as attached to Plaintiffs
commencement. Nationstar Mte.. LLC v. Catizone. 127 AD3d 1151, 1152 (2nd
Dep*t2015).
11. Next,the Defendant has failed to rebut the presumption ofservice as created by the
12. The object of all service of process is said to be to give notice to the party on
whom service is made, that he may be aware of and may resist what is sought of
him, and it is a general rule that any service must be deemed sufficient which
renders it reasonably probable that the party proceeded against will be apprised of
(5572478: >20160296
Burlington & M. R. R. Co.. 70 N.Y. 223(N.Y. 1877) See also Zelnick v. Bartlik.
46 Misc. 2d 1043, 261 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1892 (N.Y. Sup.
Ct. 1965). An affidavit of service by the plaintiffs process server which specifies
the papers served, the person who was served, and the date, time, address and sets
forth facts showing that service was made by an authorized person, and in an
Bank FSB v Perez. 2012 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2328, 2012 NY Slip Op 31269(U)
(N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 4, 2012). A sworn denial of service by the defendant will
rebut the presumption of proper service only where it refutes factual allegations in
the process server's affidavit or presents a question of fact rather than baldly
13. The process server's affidavit shows that the Defendant was personally served on
14. Defendant's Opposition papers baldly stale that there is no jurisdiction but he fails
to set forth a sworn statement rebutting any of the facts in the process server's
affidavit.
15. Further, it should be noted that the Defendant did not make the requisite motion
for lack ofjurisdiction once his answer was rejected on March 24, 2017, thus he
16. Lastly, the Defendant references that relief should be granted under 5015(a)(4);
{5572478:)20160296
CONCLUSION
17. As the Defendant has failed to properly rebut the presumption of service, raise any
triable issue of fact or move for the proper relief under CPLR 50|5, Plaintiffs
(5572478;)20160296
IFILED; KINGS COUNTY CIiBRK 06/30/2016 08;10 AMI INDEX NO. 506127/2016
RECEIVED NYSCEP: 06/30/2016
LLC WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP
320 CARLETON AVE,STE^600 700 CROSSROADS BLDG
CENTRAL ISUP,NY,11722 ROCHESTER,NY 14614
(631)666-6168
Plaiatim
Against AFFIDAVrr
OF SERVICE
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
Defendants.
STATE OF NY COUNTY OF KINGS
Woody Dorsonne being dolysworn,deposes and says:that deponent is not a party to this action,is over ISyearsofage
and resides in the State ofNY.
That on June 17,2016 at9:30PM at 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE,2ND FLOOR. A/K/A 4219-4221 ATLANTIC
AVENUE,BROOKLYN,NY 11224,deponent served the within NOTICE REGARDING AVAELABIUTY OF
ELECTRONIC FIUNG &SUMMONS FORECLOSURE ACTION &FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT AND DEBT
V/UJDATION LETTER tndiidi contains the additional ixttice requirements in accordance with RPAPL§1320, along
with a copy ofthe Homeowner'sFoteelosuze Notice as required t?/RPAPL §1303,lidiich notice was printed on a
colored piece ofpaper.vAadk color differed from that ofthe color ofthe NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF
ELECTRONIC HUNG &SX»4M0NS FORECLOSURE ACTION & FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT AND DEBT
VALIDATION and the notice was in bold,fourtcen-point type, with the title ofthe notice in bold,twenty-point type,
and Certification with exlubtts as required by CPLR §3012-B bearing index # 16-506127,filed 04/18/2016 on
MICHAEL KRICEDSVSICY,defendant thoein named,
INDIVIDUAL
by delivering thereat a true copy ofeach to said defendant pensonally,d^onent knew said
person so served to be the person described assaid defend^ therein. (S)He identified(her)
himselfas such.
DESCRIPTION
Deponent describes the individual served to the best ofdeponent's ability at the time and
circumstances ofservice as follow:
S§& Skm Cotor Hair Color Aee(Attrx) Height(Anrxl Weight fAnrxl
M WHITE SALT/PEPPER 60 5'9 180
USE IN NYC The language required by NYCRR 2900.2(c),(i)&(h) was set forth
aviLCI. <m the fece ofsaid sumnions(es)
MILITARY Iasked the person spoken to whether the defendant was in active military service ofthe
SERVICE United States or ofthe State ofNY in any capacity whatever and received a
negative reply. The source ofmy inibrmaticn and the grounds of my beliefare the
s conversations and observations above nanated. Uptm infoixnation and beliefI aver that the
defendant is not in the military service ofNY or ofthe United States as that term is defined in
either the State or Federal statutes.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
KAREN KANE
Notary Public. Stele of New York UCENSE4 2033313
No.01KA6036t27 FILE 20160296
Qualified in Nassau County CASE ID Hi 4580095
Commission ExpifBs Decer-ber 04.2019
i of 1
IFILEDt KINGS COUKTY CLERK 06/30/2016 02;29 PMl index no. 506127/2016
NYSCEP DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: OS/30/2016
WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP
320CARLETONAVE,STE26C0 700CROSSROADS BLDG
CENTRAL ISLIP,NY 11722 ROCHESTER.NY 14614
(631)666-6168
Plaintiff,
Against AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OF
ADDITIONALSUMMONSPURSUANT
TOCPLR§321S(G)
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY.ET AL
Defendants.
STATE OFNEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Kevin Colbert, being duly sworn,deposes and says: that deponent Is not a party to this action, is over 18 years ofage and
resides in Nassau County,New Yoric.
That on 06/28a016,dqxment sent a copy ofthe Summons in the within action by Fim Class Mail to MICHAEL
KRICHEVSKY,the defendant herein, properly enclosed in an envelope addressed to said defendant at defendant's last
known address at 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE,2ND FLOOR, A/K/A 42IM221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
BROOKLYN,NY 11224,bearing the legend"PERSONAL& CONFIDENTIAL"end not indicating on the outside theieof,
by the return address or otherwise,that the cmninunication is from an attorney or concerns an alleged debt. That deponent
deposited said envelope In an ofHclai depository under the exclusive care
re and
and custody
custody of
ofth&J^{tpd£tates
theji^itpd^tati Postal Service.
PILEfOm^<S
CASE ID ^4580095
E-PILE
IZABEtAARUV
NOTARY PU8UC.6lsis 8l Nm Yoik
No. GlARCaslSO
QusSSod In SuffGUiCount/
Coflsmission Expels Msreii 30,2010
03v\«—
1 of 1
IFILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/18/2016 02r2y^ INDEX*NO. 506127/2016
mmr.lLC WOODSOVIAlTGILMAN.fi?''^'' 05/18/2016
320 CARLETON AVE|STE.2600 700 Crossroads Bldg
CENTRAL ISLIP. NY,11722 Rochester, NY 14614
(631)666-6168
Plflintiff,
Against AFFIDAVIT
OFSERVICE
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
Defendawfg,
STATE OF NY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Steven Brencan being doiy swoin,deposes and sa^:that deponentis not a paity to this action,is over 18 years ofage
and resides in the State ofNY.
Thaton May03,2016 at 12:20PM at 300 MotorParlcway,Hauppatige,NY 11788,deponent served the within NOTICE
REGARDING AVAILABIUTY OF ELECTRONIC FlUNQ &SUMMONSFORECLOSURE ACTION &
FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT and Ceitifieation with exhibits as required by CPLR §3012-B bearing index U16-
506127,filed 04/18/2016 on NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCB.defendant
dteim named.
CORPORATION
A corporation,by delivering thereat a true copy ofeach to CHR]S GATTO,ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL,personally; deponent knew said so served to be the coiporsticm
described as dte named defendant and knew said individual to be the AUTHORIZED
AGENT tfiaeofi
DESCRIPTION
Dqionent describes the individnal served to the best ofdeponent's abili^ at the ttmf,and
ciieumslanees ofservice as follow:
Skin Color Hair Color Aee fArax^ Height fAmxl Weieht(Anrxl
M WHITE BROWN « 40 5*9 180
MILITARY I asked the person spoken to whedier the defendant was in active military service ofthe
SERVICE United States or ofthe State ofNY in any capacity whatever and received a
negative reply. The source ofmy infennation and the grounds ofmy beliefare dte
conversations and observadons above narrated. Upon infoaHhtiod'and beliefI aver tbatj
defendantis notin the miiitaiy service ofNY or oftheUnhed^^tes as that 1
either the State or Federal statutes.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
H££#M60296
ASEII^458(H)95
,rUBUC,8t*toelNowYoA
1 of 1
(PILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/11/2016 07;00 PMi INDEX'no. 306127/2016
NYSCEP DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/11/2016
PROVEST,LLC WOODS OVIATT GIJLMAN,LLP
320 Carleton Avenue, Suite 2600 700 Crossroads BIdg
Centrailslip.NY 1172 Rocbester, NY I46I4
(63I)66$^}68
Monica E. Dopwell being duly swom,deposes and says: that deponent is not a party to this acttoo,is over 18 years of
age and resides in the State ofNY.
Diat on May 03,20164:30PM at 271 CADMAN PLAZA EAST,BROOKLYN,NY,11201,deponent served the within
NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC FILING & SUMMONS FORECLOSURE ACTION &
FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT and Certification witii exhibits as required by CPLR §3012-B bearing Index # 16-
506127,filed 04/18/2016 on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
defendant therein named.
CORPORATION
A corporation, by delivering titercat a true copy of each to ROSA MARTINEZ, LEGAL
ASST., personally; deponent knew said so served to be the corporation described as die
named defendant and knew said individual to be the AUTHOIUZED AGENT tfiereof.
MAILING
On 05/10/2016 deponent also enclosed a copy of same, in a prepaid sealed, first class
X wrapper marked certified (7015 1520 0001 1822 0786} and properly addressed to defendant
at 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530 and deposited said wrapper in a
post office of the United States Postal Service within New York State.
DESCRIPTION
Deponent describes tlie individual served to the best of deponent's ability at the time and
circumstances of service as foUow:
Sex Skin Cotor Hair Color Ace fAontl Height fAntxl Weight f Aorx)
F BROWN BLACK 55 5'4 200
USE IN NYC The language required by NYCRR 29002(e), (0 & (h) was set forth
CIVIL CT. on the face of said summons(es)
MILITARY I asked the person spoken to whether the defendant was in active military service of the
SERVICE United States or of the State of NY in any capacity whatever and received a
negative reply. Tlie source of my information and the grounds of my belief are the
□ conversations and observations above narrated. Upon information and belief I aver that the
defendant is not in the miliiaiy service of NY or of the United Sraiesas that term is defined in
eitherihc State or
r A
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON JL./L.
LICENSE# A' 1240610
DIANE LAURELU
Notary Publiti, State of New York FILE Tf 20160296
NO.O1LA6327120 CASE ID If 4580D95
Qualified in Nassau County
Commission Expires June 29.2018
1 of 1
[FILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERIC 05/18/2016 02;27 PlMfl index NO. SO6127/2016
NYSCEP doc. no. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/18/2016
A ve STE.2600
CARLETON AVB, oArtft WOODS
700 OVIATT
Crossroads BIdgOILMAN,LLP
CENTRAL ISUP,NY.11722 Rochester,NY 14614
(631)666.6168
SWpRN TO BEFORE ME ON
ICENSE# 1292936
FILE #20160296
CASE ID #4580095
TARA DONOVAN
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF NEWVORK
No. 01816210234
»■. r'
; wyCoxinfiBsiooinExplfoo
Richmond Ccanty
Axigust 10,2017
1 of 1
jglLED; KXUGS COtn<TY CLERK 06/3072016 QSilQ 115 IKDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCcF
WOODSOVIATT(5II.M NYSCEF: 06/30/2016
CD^IS^.NY 11722 ROCHESTER.NY 14614
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
INDEX #16-506127
UA BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATBS,SERIES 2006-F,
Plaintifl^
Against AFFIDAVIT
OF SERVICE
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
Defendants.
STATE OF NY COUNTY OF KINGS
Woody Doi^ime being duly swoin,deposes and says: that deponent is not a party to this acu'on.is over 18 years ofoec
and resides m the State ofNY.
SW<^TO BEFORE ME ON
UCENSE#2033315
FILE #20160296
KEVm ItSCCAKTHY
NOTARY PUBUC.State of Naw York CASE ID #4580095
No.01IKCat»82S
Queniiad In Naoseti County
Commission EiplteB 08/060019
1 of 1
IFILED; KINGS CQtlNTY CLERK 06>3Q/'2016 08;27 AMI INDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEF Jlj, wonnc nviii-p NYSCEF: 06/30/2016
320CARLEIONAVE.STE2600 TOO CROSSI^Sl
(praALisup.NY.11722 ®?;°°
(631)666-6168 ROCHESTER,NY 14614
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OFNEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
INDEX# 16-506127
U^.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR BANC
CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-
THROUGH CERTIFICATES,SERIES 2006-F,
Plaintiff
Against
AFFIDAVIT
OF MAILING
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
PefendanL*:,
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
i
BROOKLYN,NY 11224,Mduch building consists ofless than five dwelling[Units.
enclosed in a post-paid first class properly addressed wni]^er,in a post office-official
via
paia
paid properly addressed
nddrf^i'iffl wcapper,
wraimer and wr
s»nii delivering receipt
same requested
to the by dqiositing
United States a tnie copy
Postal Sendee same
withinofthe enclosed
State a post
ofNewinYo^
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
JW 28 2016 HLE#20160296
CASE ID #4580095
"w. .>:i?o
Cemtr«»K,n
.2010. rr liiilflfllil
r^
ru
LujIboLc- nj .^^fiof-dclr/c/iOin.'crniDiio.T.^'vrnlloufAv/^ii^^ ::nthyi-A\:hsps^
^FFiCIAt. USE 1
t
A /
□sSj::^iS£r"*r"——« ;>/ '
OOotrinlteij^lMacMdc} i
! Poatnaiit
□edfHMM43Ramaa40(SM>y 1
QAaASignaa9iU«<iM t HOJO' •'•
•' •
OAttastgnBtmiiaaicadOeBtoy a
tway '■ —
o- ToCrp
□
S
solun
BROOKLYN, NY 1J224
««•& 4S8W95
1 of 1
'(gll^EDs kings comrrv rr.wpy ngy-anyom/r no.iA INDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEF
WOODS OVIATT GILMANftS^^^^ NYSCEF: 06/30/2016
Cen^l^Lff NY* CROSSROADS bSg
R0CHESTER,NY 14614
^ali^ROQKi w'w
Pf
ATWNTIC AVENUE,1STFL00R.A«/A«IM221 ATLANHC
^ACTION NOTICE REGARDINGCOMPLAINT
AVAJLABIUTY OF
^CTOMC FlUj^&SU^ONS FORECLOSURE &FORECLOSURE CertificaUoii
AS JUON
Aa iSSDOE #2,defendant
j^ §30I2-B
therein bearing index U 16-506127,filed 04/18/2016 on MARIA TOMKEVYCH
named,
INDIVIDUAL
by delivering thereat a true copy ofeach to said defendant personally, deponent knew said
person so served to be the person described as said defendant therein. fS)He ideadfied (her)
himselfas such.
DESCRIPTION
Deponent describes the individual served to the best ofdeponent's abihty at the time and
circumstances ofservice as follow:
Slpn Color Hair Color AgefAprx^ HeiehtfAorxl WeichtfAnr*^
F WHITE BLACK 25 5-5 5^0
USE IN NYC The language required by NYCRR 2900.2(e),(f)&(h) was set forth
aVILCT. on the face ofsaid suniniQos(es)
MIUTARY 1 a^ed the person spoken to whether the defendant was In active military service ofthe
SERVICE United States or ofthe State ofNY in any capacity whatever and received a
negative i^ly. The source ofmy infonnatioQ and the grounds of my beliefare the
s conversations and observations above narrated. Upon information and beliefI aver that the
defendant is not in the military service of New York or ofthe United States as that term is
defined in either the State or Federal statutes.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
1 of 1
(FILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/30/2016 08;27 AMi INDBX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEF RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2016
'
320 CARLETON AVE,STE2600 WOODS
700 OVIATT OILMAN.
CROSSROADS BLDG LLP
(631)666-6168 ^ ROCHESTER.NY I46I4
Plaintiff,
Against AFFIDAVIT
OFMAILING
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Ross Kennedy,being duly sworn,dqxtses end says: that deponent is not a party to this action,is over 18 years ofage and
resides in Sufrolk CounQ^ New York.
On 06/27/2016,dq>onentserved the within RPAPL§1303 Tenant Foreclosure Nodce,vdiich notice was printed on a colored
paper other than that ofthe NOnCE REGARDING AVAILABIUTY OF ELECTRONIC FILING &SUMMONS
FORECLOSURE ACTION &FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT pursuant to RPAPL §1303 on MARIA TOMKEVYCH AS
JOHN DOE #2 AT 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE,1ST FLOOR,A/K/A 4219s.4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
BROOKLYN,NY 11224,whl^ bnUding consists ofless tttnii five dwelling units.
by depositing a true copy ofsame enclosed in a post-paid first class properly addressed wrapper,in a post office-official
deposhoxy under the exclusive care and custody ofthe United States Postal Service within the State ofNew York and via
co^ed mail(7015091000004044 2226),return receiptrequested by depositing a true crqiy ofsame enclosed in a post
paid prtqierly addressed wrapper,and delivering same to the United States Postal Service within the State ofNew York.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
JUN 2 8 2016 FILE #20160296
CASE ID #4580095
IZABEtAARtA
KOTahy PODtlC.r.:cla or New York
1 of 1
IFILBD; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/30/2016 08;27 AM) ^^dex no. 506127/2016
NYSCEF 36 RECEIVED NYSCEP: 06/30/2016
PROVEST,LLC WOODS OVUTT GILMAN,LLP
320 CARLETON AYE,STE2600 700 C310SSR0ADS BLDG
CENTRAL ISUP,NY,11722 ROCHESTER,NY 14614
(631)666^168
Ptamti'ff,
Against AFFIDAVIT
OF MAILING
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,ET AL
pftfipi<5«Trts.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Ross Kennedy,being duly sworn,dq)oses and says: that dqwnentis not a par^to this action,is over 18 years ofage awH
residesin Suffolk County,New York.
On 06/27/2016,dqionent served the within RPAPL§1303 Tenant Foreclosure Notice, vdnch tiotice was printed on a colored
paper other than that ofthe NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC FILING & SUMMONS
FORECIOSURE ACTION & FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT pursuantto RPAPL §1303 on ANY AND ALL
OCCUPANTS AT 4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE A/K/A 4219-4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE BROOKLYN,NY 11224,
which building consists ofless than jSve dweUing units.
by dt^ositing a true copyofsame enclosed in a post-paid first class properly addressed wiapper,in a post ofilice-oCScia]
dqiository under the exclusive care and custody ofthe United States Postal Service within the State ofNew Yodc.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON
J(iM
' 7 ft
^ O OMC FILE#20160296
CASE ID #4580095
I2AI!E!AAR'A
NOTARY PU."I to.:-•>!- »4cm York
Nvi.
OuaHict'fti Saffju: County
ComiTilssten Expires Matcttso,201b
6^-—
1 of I
HELP FOR HOMEOWNERS IN FORECLOSURE
NEW YORK STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT WE SEND YOU THIS NOTICE ABOUT THE
FORECLOSURlE PROCESS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME. IF YOU FAIL TO RESPOND TO THE
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT IN THIS FORECLOSURE ACTION, YOU MAY LOSE
YOUR HOME. PLEASE READ THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT CAREFULLY. YOU
SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT AN ATTORNEY OR YOUR LOCAL LEGAL AID
OFFICE TO OBTAIN ADVICE ON HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF.
To locate an entity near you, you may call the toll-free helpline maintained
by the New York State Department of FlnanclarServices' at 1-800-342-3736 or
visit the Department's website at http://www.dfs.nv.Eov.
Be careful of people who approach you with offers to "save" your home. There
are individuals who watch for notices of foreclosure actions in order to unfairly
profit from a homeowner's distress. You should be extremely careful about any
such promises and any suggestions that you pay them a fee or sign over your
deed. State law requires anyone offering such services for profit to enter
into a contract which fully describes the services they will perform and fees they
will charge, and which prohibits them from taking any money from you until
they have completed all such promised services.
11303 NOTICE
NOTICE TO TENANTS OF BUILDINGS IN
FORECLOSURE
New York State Law requires that iVe provide you this notice about the
foreclosure process. Please read it carefully.
1 1
If you need fiirtlier information, please call the New York State
Department ofFinancial Services'toll-free helpline at l-800-2(>9-0990 or visit
the Department's website at httD!//www.dfs.nv.gov.
S TATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF KINGS
PlainlilT,
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
V.
INDEX U: 506127/2016
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, MORTGAGED PREMISES:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE INTERNAL 4221 Allanlic Avenue a/k/a
REVENUE SERVICE,CITY OF NEW YORK PARKING 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
VIOLATIONS BUREAU,JANE DOE. MARIA Brooklyn, NY 11224
TOMKEVYCH,
and JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
I am not a party to the action, am over 18 years ofage, and reside in Rochester, New York.
On November 1, 2017,1 ser\'ed a copy of the Reply and Affirniailon in Further Support of
Order of Reference relative to the above matter in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a
post office or depository ofthe United States Postal Service within the State of New York, addressed to
the last known address of the individuals as indicated below.
Michael Krichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a
4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11224
Emilv
Clerk
Plamtiff,
AFFIRMATION IN
V. OPPOSITION
Defendants.
Pursuant to CPLR 2106, and under penalty of peijury Michael Jablonski, Esq., affirms the
lollowmg:
1. AfiSnnant is an attorney with Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP the attorneys ofrecord for
the plaintiffin the above entitled action.
the briefing schedule set by Court as it was dated September 27, 2017 and served at some time
thereafter,and the deadline for submission set by the Court was September 22,2017.
{5570569:}
5. For the reasons set forth in more detail herein, the relief requested by Defendant
must be denied, in its entirety, and with prejudice, and an Order of Reference and default Judgment
6. "On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211, the court may grant dismissal
when documentary evidence submitted conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims
as a matter of law.'*' Beal Sav. Bank v. Sommer. S NY3d 318,324(2007). Defendant has failed
8. That Defendant has failed to serve a timely Answer or move to dismiss the
Complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) prior to the time before service ofthe responsive pleading
was required. As such this objection and/or defense has been waived. See CPLR 3211(e).
relied upon must definitively dispose of the plaintiffs claim." Greenwood Packing Corn, v.
Associated Tel. Design. Inc.. 140 A.D.2d 303, 305, 527 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1988 N.Y. App. Div.
11. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
{5570569:)
12. "Because New York's Supreme Court 'is a court of original, unlimited and
foreclosure actions." Security Pacific Nat'l Bank v. Evans. 31 A.D.3d 278,280,820 N.Y.S.2d 2,
4 (2d Dep't 2006)(quoting Kaeen v. Kaeen. 21 N.Y.2d 532, 537, 289 N.Y.S.2d 195 (1968);
14. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
15. That Defendant has failed to serve a timely Answer or move to dismiss the
Complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3) prior to the time before service of the responsive pleading
was required. As such this objection and/or defense has been waived. See CPLR 3211(e).
16. Furthermore, as legal capacity refers to a litigant's power to appear before the court,
it is determined by the status ofthe litigant, such as whether the litigant is an infant, adjudicated as
incompetent, a trustee, governmental entity, or a corporation. Sec. Pac. Nat'l bank v Fvang^ 31
17. A Trustee holds legal title to Trust property. New York E.P.T.L. § 7-2.1. As
such, the Trustee is the proper party to maintain an action on behalf of the Trust, particularly in
the context of a foreclosure. "[Wjhere a bond and mortgage are held in trust for the benefit ofa
third person, the trustee, as holder of the legal title thereof, ordinarily is entitled to maintain an
action to foreclosure the mortgage although on such person's refusal to act in a proper case, the
beneficiary may bring the action." 78 New York Jurisprudence Mortgages and Deeds of Trusts §
535.
{5570569:}
19. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
20. That Defendant has failed to serve a timely Answer or move to dismiss the
Complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) prior to the time before service ofthe responsive pleading
was required. As such this objection and/or defense has been waived. See CPLR 3211(e).
21. Furthermore, this action was timely commenced on April 18, 2016 based on
Defendant's default in payment for the June 1, 2010 payment due under the terms of the Note and
Mortgage. See Plaintiffs Afhrmation of Regularity at Exhibit "G," previously filed herein. The
22. That with respect to the filing of a prior foreclosure action on October 8,2009,the
commencement of this action was still within the six year statute of limitations.
23. "'With respect to a mortgage payable in installments, there are 'separate causes of
action for each installment accrued, and the Statute of Limitations [begins] to run, on the date
each installment[becomes] due." Cohen.80 A.D.3d at 754,915 N.Y.S.2d 569(2d Dept. 2011).
24. That with respect to a prior action alleged to have been filed by Defendant,
acceleration did not occur as the proceedings did not reach judgment. See Nationstar Morte.. LLC
V. MacPherson. 2017 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1296, 2017 NY Slip Op 27120, 2017 WL 1360209
26. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
3211(a)(7). Defendant's arguments lack merit.
27. "On a defendant's motion to dismiss a complaint based upon the plaintiffs alleged
lack of standing,the burden is on the moving defendant to establish, prima facie, the plaintiffs
{5570569:)
lack of standing as a matter of law." DLJ Mtge. Capital. Inc. v Pittman. 150 A.D.3d 818, 820,
2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3658,2017 NY Slip Op 03730,56 N.Y.S.3d 120(2d Dep't 2017).
28. That Defendant &ils to make any legally cognizable claims as to why Plaintifflacks
30. That Plaintiff has demonstrated its standing to foreclose as holder of the Note by
attaching a dated attorney certified copy of the Note,endorsed to its favor, to the Complaint. See
Plaintiffs Af&rmation of Regularity at Exhibit G,previously filed herein; see generally Nationstar
Mtee.. LLC v Catizone. 127 A.D.3d 1151, 1152, 9 N.Y.S.3d 315, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS
3475, 2015 NY Slip Op 03510 (2d Dep't 2015); Bank of New York v. Silverbere. 86 A.D.3d
274, 281, 926 N.Y.S.2d 532, 538 (2d Dep't 2011) quoting US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v Madero. 80
31. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
32. It is well settled that a process server's sworn affidavit constitutes prima facie
evidence of proper service. Bidetti v. Salter. 108 A.D.2d 890, 485 N.Y.S.2d 772 (2d Dep't
1985); Vahotis v Psaroudis. 78 A.D.3d 683; 911 N.Y.S.2d 111 (2d Dep't 2010); Commissioners
of State Ins. Fund v. Nobre. Inc.. 29 A.D.3d 511; 816 N.Y.S.2d 493;(2d Dept. 2006); Wieck v.
33. Here, a filed affidavit of service from the process server evidencing service upon
Defendant. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is the Affidavit of Service filed on Defendant A
supplemental summons was served upon Defendant pursuant to CPLR 3215(g) on June 6, 2016.
(5570569:)
34. To rebut the presumption of service, the defendant was required to supply an
affidavit wherein it swears to specific facts to rebut the statements in the process server's
affidavit.^C&H Import & Export. Inc. v MNA Global. Inc.. 79 A.D-3d 784; 912 N.Y.S.2d
428(2d Dep't 2010); Foster v. Gordon.269 A.D.2d 152, 703 N.Y.S.2d 23(1st Dep't 2000).
35. Defendant has failed to provide a sworn affidavit attesting to specific facts to
rebut the statements in the process server's affidavit, instead providing an unsigned, unsworn
"Affidavit in Support of Motion to Dismiss and For Sanctions." See Defendant's Affidavit in
Opposition to Alleged Plaintiffs Motion for an Order of Reference and in Support of Cross-
Motion to Dismiss and For Sanctions("Defendant's Affidavit in Opposition") at Exhibit B.
36. In fact, the Affidavit that Defendant seems to be relying upon to rebut the process
server's affidavit is from a 2009 action, is unsigned but dated in January of 2010, and references
service ofprocess effectuated in a different proceeding. See Defendant's Affidavit in Opposition
at Exhibit B. That this Affidavit certainly cannot refute the affidavit of the process server and
37. That nowhere in the signed and sworn Defendant's Affidavit in Opposition does
he swear to a denial ofreceipt of service of process or specific facts to rebut the process server's
statements. See Defendant's Affidavit in Opposition.
38. As such. Defendant is not entitled to a traverse hearing on the issue of personal
jurisdiction, much less dismissal ofthe Complaint,and Defendant's motion must be denied.
39. Defendant alleges that dismissal of the Complaint is warranted pursuant to CPLR
40. That Defendant fails to specify what necessary party was not named and has
(5570569:}
41. Furthermore, the absence of a necessary party in a mortgage foreclosure action is
a mortgage foreclosure action simply leaves that party's rights unaffected by the judgment of
foreclosure and sale. See Ben. Homeowner Serv. Corp. v. Butler. 14 Misc. 3d 1233(A), 836
N.Y.S.2d 491, 2007 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 413, 2007 NY Slip Op 50278(U)(N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2007);
See also Marine Midland Bank. N. A. v. Freedom Rd. Realty Assocs.. 203 A.D.2d 538, 611
43. That based on the foregoing. Defendant's Cross-Motion must be denied, in its
44. Defendant seeks leave to interpose a late Answer and Counterclaims. Defendant's
showing of legal merit and a reasonable excuse for the delay [...]" Eaton v. Equitable Life
LEXIS 3505,*11-12(1982).
46. Defendant fails to allege, much less establish,a reasonable excuse for his default.
47. As stated in more detail above. Defendant's allegations as to improper service are
(5570569:}
49. Furthermore, the Defendant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for
his lengthy delay in bringing the instant motion to vacate his default, considering that he was
aware of the foreclosure as early as March of 2017, as evidenced by his late Answer served on
March 20, 2017. See Yenez. 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5103 (2d Dep't 1997); Bekker v.
PleischmaiL 35 A.D.3d 334, 825 N.Y.S.2d 270, 2006 N.Y, App. Div. LEXIS 14645, 2006 NY
Slip Op 9143 (2d Dep't 2006). Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is Plaintiffs rejection of said
whether she sufficiently demonstrated the existence of a potentially meritorious defense." Reich
V Redlev.96 A.D.3d 1038,947 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2012 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5094,2012 NY Slip
51. That it remains for the reasons set forth above and herein, that Defendant has
failed to set forth a meritorious defense to the foreclosure. As such, the relief requested by the
52. Defendant makes various allegations seeking relief pursuant to CPLR 5015 and
3216 and seeks leave to file a late Answer. Defendant's arguments lack merit
53. Initially, CPLR 5015 is not applicable as Defendant does not seek to modify or
reverse ajudgment or order, no orders having been entered by the Judge to-date in this case.
54. That CPLR 3216 does not apply to this action, as no issue has been joined. That
CPLR 3216 does not provide a basis for dismissal as grounded upon any alleged prior action.
55. That Defendant has not sufficiently sustained its burden of demonstrating that
Plaintiff or its counsel's conduct is sanctionable. Neither Plaintiff nor its counsel made material
{5570569;}
factual statements that are false, and in fact has a meritorious cause of action. As such. Rule 1 SO
LI does not apply and Defendant is not entitled to attorneys' fees or sanctions.
56. With respect to Defendant's claim that Victoria Munian, Esq. peijuriously stated
that "no previous application has been made for this or like relief," Ms. Munian's statements in
her Affirmation of Regularity were not inaccurate as the statement referred to applications made
within the instant action. That no prior application for an Order of Reference was made in this
action.
57. That this action was not frivolous as Plaintiff has demonstrated its standing to
foreclose and for the reasons set forth more fully above.
58. That Defendant has not demonstrated an entitlement to disclosure, as the issue has
59. That to the extend any allegations by the Defendant have been misunderstood or
overlooked due to the form of Defendant's papers, Plaintiff categorically denies and alleges that
each and every ofthe remaining allegations in Defendant's papers lacks merit.
60. That based on the foregoing. Defendant's Cross-Motion must be denied, in its
ii^r
Miehael Jablonski, Esq.
Atiorneysfor Plaintiff
Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP
700 Crossroads Building
2 State Street
Rochester, NY 14614
Tel.:(855)227-5072
{5570569;)
i ^
Exhibit A
IFILBD; KINGS COPNTY CltBBK 06/30/2016 OStlO Atti INDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEP MC 13 RBCEIVED NYSCBF: 06/30/2016
PROVEST,LLC WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP
320 CARLETON AVE,STB.2600 700 CROSSROADS BLD6
CENTRAL ISUP,NY,11722 ROCHBSTE^ NY 14614
(631)666-6168
Against AFFIDAVIT
OFSERVICE
MICHAEL KRICBEVSKY,£T AL
ttefeadants.
STATE OF NY COUNTY OF KINGS
WctxfyDoisonne bdsg dulyswoin,dqMses and says: that di^onent is not a pai^to this action,is over 18 yeais ofage
and residesin the State ofNY.
DESCRIPTION
Dqrenentdesaibes the irtdivtdual served to the best ofdqiottcnt's abili^ at the time and
drcumstances ofservice as follow:
Skia Color H^ifCplpr ARe(AT»»y) Height(Affry) weight fAoncl
M WHITE SALT/PEPPER 60 5'9 ISO
USEIN NYC The language required by NYCRR 2900.2(e),(f)&(h) was set forth
CIVIL or. on the fece ofsaid summons(es)
MIUTARY I asked the person spoken to whether the defendant was in active miUtaiy service ofthe
SERVICE United Stales or ofthe State ofNY in any cqiaclty whatever and received a
negative reply. The source ofmy information and the grounds of my bdiefare the
] conversations and observations above narrated. Upon inibrmation and beliefI aver that the
defendantis notin the military service ofNY or ofthe United Slates as that term is defined in
either the State or Federal statutes.
SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON ^ » • r-
KAREN KANE
Nolaiy Putrilc, State of New York UCENSE# 20333IS
No.01KA60S8127 FILE #20160296
Qualified in Nassau County CASE ID #4580095
Ccmmission Expires Decerbar(M.2019
I o£ 1
Exhibit B
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY COURT: COUNTY OF KINGS
V. MORTGAGED PREMISES:
4221 ATLANTIC AVENUE
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK A/K/A 4219-4221 ATLANTIC
STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND AVENUE BROOKLYN,NY
FINANCE,UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 11224
BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
CITY OF NEW YORK PARKING SBL#:
VIOLATIONS BUREAU, BLOCK 7026 LOT 53
And JOHN DOE
Defendants.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Plaintiff be and hereby is returning and rejecting the
Answer with Counter Claims of the Defendant Michael Krichevsky, dated March 8, 2017 and
July 6,2016.
2. The Answer and was served after the time to respond had expired.
5. Pursuant to section 320(a)ofthe New York Civil Practice Law and Rules
("CPLR*'),Defendant's time to reqwnd to the complaint expired on July 6,2016. Yet, Defendant
{4918779;)
6. The Answer is therefore untimely pursuant to CPLR 320(a) and 3012(a)and is
TO:
Michael Krichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue
a/k/a 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn,NY 11224
{4918779:)
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY COURT:COUNTY OF KINGS
Defendants.
That the deponent is an Employee of Woods Oviatt Oilman, LLP, attorney for the
Plaintiff in the above entitled foreclosure action and resides in the State of New York, That
Deponent is not a party to this action and is over the age of18 years.
That on the 90 day of March,2017, Deponent served a true copy of the Notice of
Return and Rejection of Answer in this action on the Defendants whose names and addresses
appear below by depositii^ a true copy of same, enclosed in a postpaid properly addressed
{4918779:)
wrapper, in an official postal depository at 700 Crossroads Building, 2 State Street, Rochester,
New York, under the caie and custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of
New York.
Manna Pacoe/b
^0 day of March,2017
TO:
Michael Krichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue
a/k/a 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn,NY 11224
{4918779:)
IFILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/09/2017 09;46 AM) INDEX NO. 506127/2016
MYSCEP doc. no. 27 RBCBIV3D NYSCEF: 03/09/2017
INDEX NO.506I27/20I6
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,SERIES 2006F, VERIFIED ANSWER TO
Plaintiir, UNDATED
FORECLOSURE
-against- COMPLAlNTi
COUNTERCLAIMS
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,et al* DEMAND FOR TRIAL
Defendants. BY JURY
COUNSELORS:"Our courts should not be collection agencies for crooks." — John Walheei
Governor of Hawaii,1986-1^4.
TAKE JUDICIALNOTICE: that I, Michael Krichevsky, am alive, private man, who is one ofthe people
of New York. I am domiciled in the material world to wit: geographic area offormer Dutch colony
currently known as New York Republic. The change from colony to republic occurred during creation and
signing ofConstitutionfor the united states ofAmerica. Man,Michael Krichevsky,therefore stands on the
common law custom and usagejurisdiction of people domiciled in this geographic area. THE STATE OF
NEW YORK is fictitious entity, creation of mind,known as corporatioa Alive man,Michel Krichevsky,
contrary is incompetent or trying to perpetrate the fraud upon the court in procuringjurisdiction ofTHE
eSiSW 9-aVHtllll
iia3"lO
I of 49
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF KINGS
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
FOR BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2006-F,
Plaintiff,
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
INDEX#: 506127/2016
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,NEW YORK STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, MORTGAGED PREMISES:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE INTERNAL 4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a
REVENUE SERVICE,CITY OF NEW YORK PARKING 4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
VIOLATIONS BUREAU,JANE DOE.MARIA Brooklyn, NY 11224
TOMKEVYCH,
and JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
I am not a party to the action, am over 18 years ofage, and reside in Rochester, New York.
On October 31,2017,1 served a copy of the Affirmation in Opposition relative to the above
matter in a sealed envelope, with postage prepaid thereon, in a post ofhce or depository of the United
States Postal Service within the State of New York,addressed to the last known address ofdie individuals
as indicated below.
Michael Krichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue a/k/a
4219-4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11224
Sara E. Smith
Clerk
Notary Pubnc
NOTMV PUBUC,A-Stele
HARRIS
of New York
Qualified in Monroe County
Reglslratlon No.01HA6292074
(SS70923:}
commission Expires October 28,20^1
EXHIBIT I
STATE OF NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF KINGS
Plaintiff,
StJR-REPLY
Defendants.
Pursuant to CPLR 2106, and under penalty of pequry Michael Jablonski, Esq., afBrms the
following:
1. Affirmanl is an attorney with Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP the attorneys of record for
Motion for Order of Reference" of Defendant Michael Krichevsky ("Defendant") and in Ruther
support ofPlaintiffs pending Motion for an Order of Reference ("Plaintiffs Motion"),and in further
Motion"). Leave for Defendant to serve additional Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion, as well as for
Plaintiffto file a Sur-Reply thereto, was granted orally by this Court on November 13,2017.
3. Defendant, to the best of Plaintiffs counsel's ability to discern, alleges that Plaintiff
has not responded to various discovery demands including but not limited to requests for
{5763225: J
documentary proof ofthe existence of the Plaintiff and that therefore Plaintiff is not entitled to an
dated October 31,2017, Defendant is in default in Answering the Complaint and the issue has not
been joined. See Affirmation in Opposition of Michael Jablonski, Esq. dated October 31, 2017,
5. It remains that Defendant has not alleged a reasonable excuse for his failure to file a
timely Answer, as is required to vacate his default Eaton v. Equitable Life Assuranr-f* Snr., 56
N.Y.2d 900,906,438N.E.2d 1119, 1122, 453 N.Y.S.2d 404,407,1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3505, *11-
12(1982).
6. A defeulting party is deemed to have admitted all allegations in the Complaint. See
8. "It is incumbent on the party seeking disclosure to demonstrate that the method of
discovery sought will result in the disclosure of relevant evidence or is reasonably calculated to
lead to the discovery of information bearing on the claims r...1."Cra2vtown Furniture. Inc. v
Brooklyn Union Gas Co.. 150 AD2d 420,421 (2d Dep't 1989).
9. That none of the disclosure requested by Defendant goes to the merits of the
instant motion, which is simply whether Plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case for
foreclosure and whether Defendant was in default in timely Answering the Complaint. See
{5763225:}
10. Furlhennore, the sufficiency of Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment pursuant to
CPLR 3215 is to bejudged at the time the motion was submitted, which predated the service ofany
discovery demands by Defendant. See State of NY v Williams. 26 Misc 3d 743, 749(Sup Ct,
11. That Plaintiff has met its burden pursuant to CPLR 3215(f). See Plaintiffs
Affirmation of Regularity at Exhibits A and J.'The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting
only to some firsthand confirmation ofthe facts." Feffer v. Malneso. 210 AD2d 60,61 (1st Dep't
1994).
12. Based on the foregoing, in light of Defendant's default and his failure to allege a
reasonable excuse for failing to submit a timely Answer, the relief requested by PlaintiEf should not
13. Furthermore,U.S. Bank National Association does in fact exist, as does the Trust for
which it acts as Trustee. See Plaintiffs Affirmation of Regularity at Exhibit P, previously filed
edgar?action=getcompany&ClK=0000830013&type=&dateb=&owner=include&start= 1 OO&count
=100&output=xml.
14. That the various defenses alleged by Defendant in his additional Opposition have
15. That PlaintilT and its counsel categoricaUy denies the remaining allegations,
{5763225:)
16. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion must be granted, in its entirety, and
{5763225:}
EXHIBIT L
Supreme Court of New York
Kings County
INDEX NO.506127/2016
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES.SERIES 2006F. NOTICE OF AMENDED
Plaintiff. OMNIBUS
CROSS-MOTION TO
-against- DISMISS AND FOR
SANCTIONS
MICHAEL KRICHEVSKY,el al, Justice Noah Dear
Defendants. Oral argument requested
COUNSELORS:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,that upon the annexed affidavit of Michael Krichevsky, sui
juris,sworn to the 7th day of March,2018 and upon all the pleadings and proceedings heretofore
had herein with and/or without presence of Falsely Accused, he will cross-move. Under Duress,
before this Court at an IAS Part I, room 756, at the Courthouse located at 360 Adams Street,
Brooklyn, New York on the 7th day of March,2018 at 9:30 a.m. in the forenoon of that day or as
soon thereafter as counsel can be heard for judgment dismissing the action with prejudice and
1. Adjourn the March 7"', 2018 hearing on the record with court reporter 1 requested
because I need to travel out ofstate and verify last minute information in alleged plaintiffs sur-
Evidentiary Hearing.
3. Take judicial notice of Defendant's status as alive man, not juristic entity or legal fiction
such as corporation,trust or estate spelled NAME in all capital letters on caption and in exhibits
of this action.
4. As a first step, set in-K:ourt identification testimony of Plaintiff and order alleged
plaintiffs attorney, WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP. to show authority per New York State
Agency laws to represent alleged Plaintiff by disclosing identity ofthe parties to retainer per
5. Dismiss the action with prejudice per CPLR §3211 (a)(5)- as 6 years Statute of
point with paper evidence in their possession per CPLR 2214(c)as 1 expect that they would not
do it intentionally.
8. Thereafter, per CPLR 2214(c) papers to be produced on notice and per CPLR 2218 trial
ofissue raised on motion compel WOODS OVIATT OILMAN. LLP. to produce the jury proof
of Plaintiffs standing and identity; direct attorney allegedly representing corporation or trust in
court to appear with corporate charter and/or other forming documents to rule out champerty,
10. Additionally and alternatively, dismiss with prejudice NUNC PRO TUNC the action per
CPLR §3216 for failure to prosecute 2009 action, doctrines ofequitable estoppels and laches.
11. In the event this motion is not persuasive, compel Plaintiff to accept filed answer with
13. Alternatively, dismiss NUNC PRO TUNC the action per CPLR §3216 for failure to
15. Sanction attorneys for alleged Plaintiff for frivolously starting this action.
17. In the event this motion is lawfully lost, treat this motion partially as a Motion for More
18. In addition, for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem Just and Equitable,
Mach 31,201^by regular mail and Certified RRR 7012^1470 ODQJt 5316 4316
Noah Dear
969 E 7"^ Street
Brooklyn, New York 11230-2705
This letter should not be considered as ex-parte communication per se. I write this letter to
you as a man to man,individually. 1 would like to respectfully remind you of your mandatory duty
under 18 U.S.C. §4: Misprision of Felony. 1 am a victim ofcrimes by opposing attorneys violating
Donald J. Trump Executive Order regarding human trafficking and violation of Magnitski Act. I
would like this letter to serve as Personal Notice and my Loss Prevention Practice. Additionally,
this letter should be used as a sealed information or criminal complaint against opposing attorneys'
felonies.
There is no penalty for making reasonable mistakes during litigation in good faith.
However,ifone intentionally does harm,then he may be sued. But, before he can be sued, he must
be given a fair opportunity to correct his error. My affidavits gave them that fair opportunity. By it,
they may have sufficient notice to assert proper diligence and inquire further to discover that which
an inquiry pursued in good faith would disclose. I have a reason to believe that ifI address this
letter to your place ofbusiness, your court attorneys may not deliver this letter for you to read. I am
alarmed and outraged by conduct of all attorneys involved for the reasons stated below.
As you.Judge, may recall there was a hearing on March 7,2018, which 1 requested earlier.
My intention was, and I told about it to your court attorney, to make a record ofopposing
attomeys' misconduct, which sabotaged my due process and defense rights, and nothing else.
These rights are not granted by the judge or opposing attorneys, but protected by them to limit
government's ability to abuse people. Otherwise, they lose jurisdiction. 1 noticed said misconduct
in my affidavits and in one attempt to 'meet and confer.* I told your clerk about that misconduct.
Then, your clerk scheduled this hearing. 1 intended to discuss that misconduct and get your
assistance on the record in upholding my rights and due process. I watched how your clerk was
whispering something to you right before the hearing, which gave me a feeling that it was
something about my case.
As 1 suspected,things did not go the way 1 planned and intended. I was rushed tojudgment
under your presumption that I fully submitted my opposition for you to make final decision. You
may recall that 1 objected to this presumption or ruling of'papers fully submitted.' 1 also had a
feeling that my case was predetermined, hence 'fully submitted' and there is no reason for delay
the award my estate to these criminals.
As I understand the law, I have to agree to the presumption of'fully submitted', have to
feel confident that I indeed had full and fair opportunity to litigate my defense. In addition, I have
to be confident in your presumed intent and ability to render impartial, fair and equitable ruling. At
this moment,1 am not confident that it will be you,Judge, personally making a ruling or that your
ruling is not influenced by misleading evidence from opposing attorneys.
Now,I infer that opposing attorneys deliberately failed and later refused to address my
accusations and discovery demands because they knew that they were guilty. Even if they denied
my accusations, that still would be an admission on the record of their knowledge ofthe issues I
have raised. Instead,they pretended to be blissfully ignorant of my demands and accusations when
they deliberately made''strawman" arguments described in my last affidavit, which I handed to
you.
I consulted one prominent attorney about these criminals and he advised me to rewrite my
affidavit as if I write for a 5 year old so that neitherjudge nor attorneys can argue
misunderstanding. To accomplish this. I decided to travel to the corporate offices of alleged
plaintiff and its alleged witnesses and a)get denial or admission of retainer with opposing
attorneys; and b)denial or admission that US BANK is acting as trustee for non-existent trust. You
see, according to all court filings with witness affidavits by alleged plaintiff, US BANK is acting
as trustee for BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING CORPORATION (alleged TRUST),which is
actually "depositor" as party to Pooling and Servicing Agreement(PSA)by definition. The copy
ofthis incomplete PSA(15 pages out of210)alleged plaintiffentered into court record as exhibit P
of the order of reference. 1 enclosed it here as courtesy. According to said copy ofPSA,the real
trust is totally different entity- Banc of America Funding 2006-F Trust(see page 28 ofexhibit P).
This trust is neither named, nor mentioned in this case, and therefore is not present here as a
necessary party with standing to start this law suit, at least theoretically. Therefore, whatever
alleged plaintiffand its alleged attorneys claim in their affirmations and affidavits contradict
exhibit P's PSA facts, the theory of securitization law and trust law.
In my affidavit, which I handed to you on March 7,2018 hearing, 1 stated that I would like
to adjourn the proceeding,amend my motion to dismiss as I am going to visit the offices ofalleged
Plaintiff and Wells Fargo Bank involved in this matter to verify or impeach opposition. I kept my
word. On March 11,2018,1 drove my car at 425 Walnut Street, Cincinnati, Ohio where US Bank
conducts Trust and Custodian Services according to the theory ofsecuritization and PSA. At this
address, there is huge high-rise building likely owned by US Bank. On the 6th floor, indeed there
are trust and custodian services of US BANK. I met with several workers there. They all were
friendly and tried to help. I presented to them complete motion for order ofreference,together with
the exhibits and asked them ifthey can identify my property or me in their computer network using
information from said documents. I also asked them whether US BANK have any relationship
with the law firm WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP from New York. I explained to them the
purpose of my visit and they all looked puzzled and concerned. In about 2 hours that 1 spent there,
they all came up with nothing. However,this nothing is something. It is an evidence ofthe lack of
evidence against me and offraud upon the court by WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP,officers of
the court. Accordingly,I defeated their motion for order of reference that even 5 years old will
understand that this whole case is unauthorized by US BANK filings, which is felony fraud.
Immediately thereafter, I drove at 3476 Stateview Boulevard, Fort Mill, SC 29715 where
Wells Fargo Bank^s foreclosure mill is located. To make a long story short, 1 came up with
nothing, which is too something in my favor.
You may recall. Judge Dear. I raised the issue ofexhibit P incompleteness and asked
opposing attorney whether it is intentional act and whether they would correct this defect. As of
today, 1 have no evidence that they filed complete PSA into record or sent me a complete copy.
Additionally,exhibit P that they filed in court differs from the one that they sent me with their
motion. The one that is in court has on it page numbering "151 of210'" mark, whereas on mine
*'151 of210'' is redacted. Accordingly,the act ofredacting this page numbering on exhibit P made
for me is deliberate act ofevidence tempering and fraud upon the court by all attorneys involved,
which is felony. Therefore, 1 infer that filing ofincomplete and redacted PSA was deliberate act to
mislead the court and me by nondisclosure ofexculpatory evidence.
1 finally obtained complete PSA on my own by wasting two hours and tinkering supplied
by opposition link to Edgar. 1 read and analyzed it. The most important part of this PSA(156
pages), is its referral to "Prospectus Supplement with PSA (277 pages)." Both documents I
enclosed here as a courtesy. After my analysis of both documents, I concluded in essence that on
June 28,2006 Bank ofAmerica made initial public offering ofcertificates as tradable securities on
Wall Street. This offering talked about future intention of the bank to sell those certificates to
investors and, using raised money, buy notes and/or mortgages secured by real estate. Prospectus
supplement finally talks about Banc of America Funding 2006-F Trust certificates(not a party to
this action). It states on page 1 that"MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,SERIES
2006-F PRINCIPAL AND/OR INTEREST PAYABLE MONTHLY,BEGINNING IN JULY
2006." Now,this statement totally contradicts fraudulent allegation in alleged Plaintiffs
complaint that 1 borrowed and money came in December of2005 from said trust because at that
time trust didn't even exist. 1 don't know about you Judge, but 1 don't believe that alleged Plaintiff
had some kind oftime machine to go back in the past and lend me money. This explains why
opposing attorneys failed to include these documents and why US Bank workers could not find my
property and 1 in their database, which was not created in 2005 in fact. It also explains why the
mortgage and the note attorneys entered into the record deliberately altered to remove any
identifiable information such as loan number.
To hit a final nail in the head,alleged lender on the note and mortgage, Fairmont Funding,
allegedly have sold my alleged note to allegedly Banc of America Funding 2006-F Trust in
June-July 2006 according to attorneys' false and presumptuous allegations. Therefore, no officer
ofFairmont Funding had any authority to sign any assignment of note and/or mortgage in 2009 to
Wells Fargo or US Bank for that matter. To add more felonies to this case, Fairmont Finding as
New York entity was closed in 2007. As such,someone forged the signature ofthe non-existent
officer of non-existent entity on the note and/or mortgage in addition to forgeries of my signature
and signatures on assignments. I can go on and on and keep pocking holes in opposition's case and
evidence, but I think you see the picture.
This letter written in good faith to avoid unnecessary appeals or article 78 complaints,
because you.Judge maybe unaware of what can transpire some day in your absence and/or sign
some order(s)that would prejudice my rights and cause me damage.
You,judge, have a duty to investigate and report these attorneys to the BAR and Second
Department for violation of22 NYCRR Part 130.1,also, request that you Judge refer this case to a
Grand Jury to investigate my facts.
This is why I am not sending to opposition a copy ofthis letter as I am hereby initiating
criminal case under seal. I request that you» Judge, do not let them know about it.
April 10,2018
Michael Krichevsky
4221 Atlantic Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11224
Sincerely, ^
Chambers Staff
CC:
Victoria E. Munian,Esq.
Attorneysfor Plaintiff
Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP
700 Crossroads Building
2 State Street
Rochester, NY 14614
Michael Krichevsky, Sui Juris
4221 Atlantic Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11224
718-687-2300
Public Notice
April 23,2018 by regular mail and Certified RRR 7QIH DM70 0001 flg'lfl MjDji
Noah Dear
969 E 7*'Street
Brooklyn,New York 11230-2705
Partners
Woods Oviatt Oilman LLP
700 Crossroads Building
2 State Street
Rochester, NY 14614
This letter is in reply to April 10,2018 unsigned letter from your chambers(copy enclosed)
to my letter addressed to you, personally (original enclosed). In that unsigned letter to me,
somebody wrote that my letter is ex-parte communication,etc. 1 presume that you read my
enclosed letter to you, directed someone to write this letter and to send my letter back with
enclosures, implying that no criminal referral would be made even ifthe crime continues. 1 read
recent news that in Pennsylvania prosecutors and judges often exchange text messages while
prosecuting a case together. Attorney who discovered that entered them into the record. Judge
moved to seal these texts, as they will damage reputation ofjudiciary in public view,implying of
12 Presumptions ofCourt. We live in crazy times-at least 1 do, is it not?
I would like to try to clarify my position ones again,so even 5 years old would understand.
For starters, I am not a member ofthe BAR and do not carry title ofnobility like Esquire.
Accordingly, I have no duty to follow any private laws offamily members only,such as NY State
Bar Association. 1 belong to God's family of men, which follow Golden Rule and Ten
Commandments. However,I have read official New York Rules of Professional Conduct and out
of my decency tried to follow them - only to learn from my personal experience that these are
propaganda tools to bamboozle people into myth of public service and equal justice,thereby
hiding 12 Presumptions ofCourt us^ on people. 1 would add that officially these rules designed to
protect people from rogue members ofthe BAR,and not the other way around. Did your stuff
attorneys ever follow Rule 8.3 - Reporting Professional Misconduct? Nobody did that in my case
from 2013 even though the evidence of misconduct is in every facet ofthis litigation starting from
2009 until today with ever changing law firms,sworn statements and fabrications ofdocumentary
evidence. I guess this settles the issue in my favor as victim ofattorney's misconduct!
As you may know,there are about 25,000 sealed indictments in federal courts across the
nation with biggest chunks, not surprisingly, in California and New York. This is historically
unprecedented number after election of Trump. Rumor has it that these are mostly indictments of
human traffickers and corrupt government officials as President Trump said,"Human trafficking
is a modem form ofthe oldest and most barbaric type ofexploitation. It has no place in our world.''
As an example,enclosed herein, is freshly unsealed indictment in Eastem District ofNew York.
These people are supporters and big financial contributors to Clinton's Campaign that she lost.
Human trafficking is forced labor, which 1 currently perform free as hostage in my defense from
2009, while all involved are earning a lavish lifestyle on my dime. In common law this crime of
human trafficking called BARRATRY.Naturally, 1 sent my sealed request to you for referral of
criminal investigation-taking a heed from US DOJ. So, why return my letter instead ofreplying
to me personally with your objections? As you may know,there is scandal after scandal going on
in Washington about corrupt governmental officials, perjury and fabrication ofdocuments with
leaks ofclassifled intelligence information to our enemies.So,it looks like secrecy and privacy are
things ofthe past, which you or your stuffconfirmed to me by leaking my request for criminal
investigation to criminals themselves. This leak enables them to start fabrication ofexculpatory
evidence in contemplation ofcriminal defense litigation. When FBI recently raided office of
attorney Michael Cohen in New York,they seized the whole office and he did not see it coming.
Whatever will happen in my case, I will reject any disclosure ofdocuments, witnesses or
explanations, which were not timely made,as fabrication and lies in contemplation of litigation
and not as business records.
On the other hand, US DOJ and members ofCongress last week made public request for
criminal prosecution ofComey,McCabe, Lynch and Clinton for, among other things,lying under
oath. 1 guess I have to live with open, public request for criminal investigation of members oflaw
firm WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP,process server Woody Dorsonne and Wells Fargo Bank.
Accordingly, I hereby notify them and make these letters public.
Again, I respectfully remind you of your oath ofoffice and fiduciary duty to protect our
communities across the state as these people not only treat law and justice with contempt, but also
hold a grave danger to safety ofthese communities and to people individually.
Misprision ofa Felony
Misprision ofa felony is the offense offailure to inform government authorities of a felony that a
person knows about. A person commits the crime ofmisprision ofa felony if that person:
knows ofa crime that the person has witnessed or that has come to the person's
attention, and failed to prevent; or
fails to report it to aJudge or other official such as FBI agent(who is not themselves
involved in the crime).
Title 18 U»S,C,§4, Misprision offelony.
Whoever, having knowledge ofthe actual commission ofa felony cognizable by a court ofthe
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to somejudge or
other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than three years,or both.
I have done my part ofreporting a crime against Communities and State to you,judge. A
federal or statejudge,or any other govemment official,is required as part ofthejudge's mandatory
administrative duties, to receive any offer of information ofa federal or state crime. If thatjudge
blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction ofjustice statutes, and
constitutes a serious offense. Upon receiving such information,thejudge is then required to make
it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the crime.
Since I started talking about our government and elections. I would like to address
opposition's argument of my default and/or late answer since they opened the door. Notice, please,
that even though prior firms played dirty. 1 did not default in those cases and won because Judge
Bunyan was old schooljudge and upheld my due process. 1 did not vote for Donald Trump because
many others like me did not believe that he could win. Many others like me thought that voting for
Trump would be futile. They and I thought ofelection fraud and believed that Hillary Clinton
would be installed akin all elections done in banana republics(see transcript ofTrump's election
speech enclosed herein, which is relevant to the issues I raised). What Comey, McCabe, Lynch,
Holder and Clinton all have in common? They are all corrupt members of New York State BAR
and groomed there before moving to Washington. When WOODS OVIATT OILMAN,LLP at the
same time brazenly filed a third frivolous foreclosure suit against me,I thought that defending it
would be futile sincejustice rigged as Trump told us in his speech. At the same time 1 became a
victim offoreclosure defense scam byjudge Anna.1 would not bore you here with details, but this
scam contributed to my delay in answer. At the same time, I watched militias forming in
contemplation of riots,second Civil War and as result the martial law bringing New World Order
planned by Clinton. Therefore, 1 started emergency preparations to bug out ofthe City to save my
life. Then a miracle happened. Trump won elections. This is when 1 realized that nation and 1 may
have a chance. Now 1 support Trump. This is why I filed my answer with counterclaims. Also,
please, notice that opposition failed to rebut or address the reason for rejecting my answer such as
surprise or prejudice. They could not since they have no case to start with. However, they
attempted to steer the court and me into arguing a law office failure in my defense. It is an attempt
to distract or divert attention from real issues ofcrime. As all know, 1 have no law office and if I
took the bait and went that route, 1 would mislead the court and lose. This is why I did not do it.
In conclusion, by this letter 1 notify the opposition as you suggested by this leak and ready
to move forward with criminal investigation ofcrimes against me.
as Depositor,
and
as Trustee
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 2
Senior Step Down Conditions: As of any Distribution Date as to which any decrease in
the Senior Prepayment Percentage for any Loan Group applies, (i)the outstanding principal
balance of all Mortgage Loans (including, for this purpose, any Mortgage Loans in foreclosure,
any REO Property and any Mortgage Loan for which the Mortgagor has filed for bankruptcy
after the Closing Date) delinquent sixty (60) days or more (averaged over the preceding six
month period), as a percentage of the aggregate Class Certificate Balance of the Subordinate
Certificates, is not equal to or greater than 50% or (ii) cumulative Realized Losses with respect
to the Mortgage Loans as of the applicable Distribution Date do not exceed the percentages of
the Original Subordinate Certificate Balance set forth below:
Percentage of Original
Distribution Date Occurring In Subordinate Certificate Balance
July 2006 through June 2009 20%
July 2009 through June 2014 30%
. July 2014 through June 2015 35%
July 2015 through June 2016 40%
July 2016 through June 2017 45%
July 2017 and thereafter 50%
Servicer: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as servicer ofthe Mortgage Loans, or
any.successor servicer appointed as herein provided.
Servicer Custodial Account: The account or accounts created and maintained by the
Servicer pursuant to Section 3.09(b) which must be an Eligible Account.
-25-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
Servicer Custodial Account Reinvestment Income: For each Distribution Date, all
income and gains net ofany losses realized since the preceding Distribution Date from Permitted
Investments offunds in the Servicer Custodial Account.
Servicing Advance: All customary, reasonable and necessary "out of pocket" costs and
expenses incurred in the performance by the Servicer of its servicing obligations, including, but
not limited to (i) the preservation, restoration and protection of a Mortgaged Property,
(ii) expenses reimbursable to the Servicer pursuant to Section 3.14 and any enforcement or
judicial proceedings, including foreclosures, (iii) the management and liquidation of any REO
Property and (iv) compliance with the obligations under Section 3.12.
Servicing Criteria: The criteria set forth in paragraph (d) ofItem 1122 of Regulation AB,
as such may be amended from time to time.
Servicing Fee: With respect to each Mortgage Loan and Distribution Date, the amount of
the fee payable to the Servicer, which shall, for such Distribution Date, be equal to one-twelfth
of the product of the Servicing Fee Rate with respect to such Mortgage Loan and the Stated
Principal Balance ofsuch Mortgage Loan,subject to reduction as provided in Section 3.17. Such
fee shall be payable monthly, computed on the basis of the same Stated Principal Balance and
period respecting which any related interest payment on a Mortgage Loan is computed. The
Servicer's right to receive the Servicing Fee is limited to, and payable solely from, the interest
portion (including recoveries with respect to interest from Liquidation Proceeds and other
proceeds, to the extent permitted by Section 3.11) of related Monthly Payments collected by the
Servicer, or as otherwise provided under Section 3.11.
Servicing Fee Rate: With respect to each Mortgage Loan,0.2500% per annum.
-26-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
Sponsor: Bank of America, National Association, a national banking association, or its
successor in interest, as seller of the Mortgage Loans under the Mortgage Loan Purchase
Agreement.
Stated Principal Balance: As to any Mortgage Loan and Due Date, the unpaid principal
balance of such Mortgage Loan as of such date as specified in the amortization schedule at the
time relating thereto (before any adjustment to such amortization schedule by reason of any
moratorium or similar waiver or grace period) after giving effect to any previous partial Principal
Prepayments and Liquidation Proceeds allocable to principal (other than with respect to any
Liquidated Mortgage Loan) and to the payment of principal due on such Due Date and
irrespective of any delinquency in payment by the related Mortgagor, and after giving effect to
any Deficient Valuation.
Subcontractor: Any vendor, subcontractor or other Person that is not responsible for the
overall servicing of Mortgage Loans but performs one or more discrete functions identified in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB with respect to Mortgage Loans under the direction or authority
ofthe Servicer, the Securities Administrator or the Custodian.
Subordinate Balance Ratio: As of any date of determination, the ratio among the
principal balances of the Class 1-LS Interest, Class 2-LS Interest and Class 3-LS Interest, equal
to the ratio among the Group Subordinate Amounts of Loan Group I, Loan Group 2 and Loan
Group 3.
Subordinate Percentage: As of any Distribution Date and Loan Group, 100% minus the
Senior Percentage for such Loan Group for such Distribution Date.
Subordinate Prenavment Percentage: As to any Distribution Date and Loan Group, 100%
minus the Senior Prepayment Percentage for such Loan Group and such Distribution Date.
Subordinate Principal Distribution Amount: With respect to any Distribution Date and
Loan Group, an amount equal to the sum of(i) the Subordinate Percentage for such Loan Group
ofthe amounts described in clauses (i)(a) through (d)ofthe definition of"Principal Amount for
such Distribution Date and Loan Group and (ii) the Subordinate Prepayment Percentage for such
Loan Group ofthe amounts described in clauses (i)(e) and (f) and the amount described in clause
(ii) ofthe definition of"Principal Amount" for such Distribution Date and Loan Group.
Subservicer: Any Person that services Mortgage Loans on behalf of the Servicer or any
Subservicer and is responsible for the performance (whether directly or through Subservicers or
Subcontractors) of a substantial portion of the material servicing functions required to be
performed by the Servicer under this Agreement or any reconstitution agreement that are
identified in Item 1122(d)of Regulation AB.
Substitute Mortgage Loan: A Mortgage Loan substituted for a Defective Mortgage Loan
which must, on the date of such substitution,(i) have a Stated Principal Balance, after deduction
ofthe principal portion ofthe Monthly Payment due in the month of substitution, not in excess of
the Stated Principal Balance of the Defective Mortgage Loan;(ii) have a Net Mortgage Interest
-27-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE I76849v9
Rate not less than, and not more than two percent (2%) greater than that of the Defective
Mortgage Loan; (ill) be of the same type as the Defective Mortgage Loan;(iv) have a Loan-to-
Value Ratio not higher than that of the Defective Mortgage Loan;(v) have a credit score not less
than that of the Defective Mortgage Loan; (vi) have a Gross Margin not less than that of the
Defective Mortgage Loan;(vii) have a credit grade not lower in quality than that of the Defective
Mortgage Loan;(viii) have a remaining term to maturity not greater than (and not more than one
year less than) that of the Defective Mortgage Loan; (ix) have the same lien priority as the
Defective Mortgage Loan;(x) have the same Index as the Defective Mortgage Loan; and (xi)
comply with each Mortgage Loan representation and warranty set forth in this Agreement, the
Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Purchase Agreement. More than one Substitute
Mortgage Loan may be substituted for a Defective Mortgage Loan if such Substitute Mortgage
Loans meet the foregoing attributes in the aggregate.
Tax Matters Person: Any person designated as "tax matters person" in accordance with
Section 5.06 and the manner provided under Treasury Regulation § 1.860F-4(d) and Treasury
Regulation § 301.6231(a)(7)-1.
Total Senior Percentage: With respect to any Distribution Date, the percentage, carried
six places rounded up, obtained by dividing the aggregate Class Certificate Balance ofthe Senior
Certificates immediately prior to such Distribution Date by the aggregate Pool Stated Principal
Balance for all Loan Groups with respect to such Distribution Date.
Treasury Regulations: The final and temporary regulations promulgated under the Code
by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Trust: The trust created by this Agreement, which shall be named "Banc of America
Funding 2006-F Trust."
Trust Estate: The segregated pool of assets subject hereto, constituting the primary trust
created hereby and to be administered hereunder, with respect to a portion of which two REMIC
elections are to be made, such entire Trust Estate consisting of: (i) such Mortgage Loans as from
time to time are subject to this Agreement, together with the Mortgage Files relating thereto, and
together with all collections thereon and proceeds thereof, (ii) any REO Property, together with
all collections thereon and proceeds thereof, (iii) the Trustee's rights with respect to the
Mortgage Loans under all insurance policies required to be maintained pursuant to this
Agreement and any proceeds thereof,(iv) the right to receive amounts, if any, payable on behalf
of any Mortgagor from the Buy-Down Account relating to any Buy-Down Mortgage Loan,
(v)the Depositor's rights under the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Purchase
Agreement (including any security interest created thereby) and (vi) the Servicer Custodial
Account and the Certificate Account and such assets that are deposited therein from time to time
-28-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE I76849v9
and any investments thereof, together with any and ail income, proceeds and payments with
respect thereto. The Buy-Down Account shall not be part ofthe Trust Estate.
Trustee: U.S. Bank National Association, and its successors-in-interest and, if a
successor trustee is appointed hereunder,such successor, as trustee.
Uncertificated Lower-Tier Interests: Any of the Class 1-L Interest, Class 1-LS Interest,
Class 2-L Interest, Class 2-LS Interest, Class 3-L Interest and Class 3-LS Interest.
Unscheduled Principal Amount: As to any Distribution Date and Loan Group,the sum of
the amounts described in clauses(e)and (f) ofthe definition of"Principal Amount."
Uooer-Tier Certificate Sub-Account: The sub-account of the Certificate Account
designated by the Securities Administrator pursuant to Section 3.09(g).
1 Inner-Tier REMIC: As defined in the Preliminary Statement, the assets of which consist
of the Uncertificated Lower-Tier Interests and such amounts as shall from time to time be
deemed held in the Upper-Tier Certificate Sub-Account.
Voting Rights: The portion of the voting rights of all ofthe Certificates which is allocated
to any Certificate. As of any date of determination,(a)1% of all Voting Rights shall be allocated
to the Holder of the Residual Certificate and (b)the remaining Voting Rights shall be allocated
among Holders ofthe remaining Classes of Certificates in proportion to the Certificate Balances
oftheir respective Certificates on such date.
Section 1.02. Calculations.
All dollar amounts calculated hereunder shall be rounded to the nearest penny with one-
half ofone penny being rounded down.
-29-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
ARTICLE II
(a) The Depositor, concurrently with the execution and delivery hereof, hereby sells,
transfers, assigns, sets over and otherwise conveys to the Trustee on behalf of the Trust for the
benefit ofthe Certificateholders, without recourse, all the right, title and interest ofthe Depositor
in and to the Mortgage Loans, including all interest and principal received on or with respect to
the Mortgage Loans (other than payments of principal and interest due and payable on the
Mortgage Loans on or before the Cut-off Date), and Ae Depositor's rights under the Mortgage
Loan Purchase Agreement. The foregoing sale, transfer, assignment and set over does not and is
not intended to result in a creation of an assumption by the Trustee of any obligation of the
Depositor or any other Person in connection with the Mortgage Loans or any agreement or
instrument relating thereto, except as specifically set forth herein. It is agreed and understood by
the parties hereto that it is not intended that any mortgage loan be included in the Trust that is a
"High-Cost Home Loan" as defined in any of(i) the New Jersey Home Ownership Act effective
November 27, 2003,(ii) the New Mexico Home Loan Protection Act effective January 1, 2004,
(iii) the Massachusetts Predatory Home Loan Practices Act effective November 7, 2004 or
(iv) the Indiana Home Loan Practices Act, effective January 1, 2005.
(b) In connection with such transfer and assignment, the Depositor has delivered or
caused to be delivered to the Trustee (or a Custodian on behalf of the Trustee) for the benefit of
the Certificateholders, the following documents or instruments with respect to each Mortgage
Loan so assigned;
(ii) subject to the provisos at the end of this paragraph, a duly executed
Assignment of Mortgage to "U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the holders of
Banc of America Funding Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-
F"(which may be included in a blanket assignment or assignments); provided that, if the
related Mortgage has not been returned from the applicable public recording office, such
Assignmient of Mortgage may exclude the information to be provided by the recording
office; and provided, further, if the related Mortgage has been recorded in the name of
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") or its designee, no
-30-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE I76849v9
Assignment of Mortgage in favor of the Trustee will be required to be prepared or
delivered and instead, the Servicer shall enforce the obligations ofthe Servicer to take all
actions as are necessary to cause the Trust to be shown as the owner of the related
Mortgage Loan on the records of MERS for purposes ofthe system ofrecording transfers
of beneficial ownership of mortgages maintained by MERS;
(iv) the original of any guarantee executed in connection with the Mortgage
Note;
(v) for each Mortgage Loan, if any, which is secured by a residential long-
term lease, a copy of the lease with evidence of recording indicated thereon, or, if the
lease is in the process of being recorded, a photocopy of the lease, certified by an officer
of the respective prior owner of such Mortgage Loan or by the applicable title insurance
company, closing/settlement/escrow agent or company or closing attorney to be a true
and correct copy of the lease transmitted for recordation; and
(vi) the original of any security agreement, chattel mortgage or equivalent
document executed in connection with the Mortgage;
provided, however, that on the Closing Date, with respect to item (iii), if an Assignment of
Mortgage is required to be recorded as set forth below,the Depositor has delivered to the Trustee
(or a Custodian on behalf ofthe Trustee)a copy ofsuch Assignment of Mortgage in blank rather
than in the name ofthe Trustee and has caused the Servicer to retain the completed Assignment
of Mortgage for recording as described below, unless such Mortgage has been recorded in the
name of MERS or its designee. In addition, if the Depositor is unable to deliver or cause the
delivery of any original Mortgage Note due to the loss of such original Mortgage Note, the
Depositor may deliver a copy of such Mortgage Note, together with a lost note affidavit, and
shall thereby be deemed to have satisfied the document delivery requirements of this
Section 2.01(b).
If in connection with any Mortgage Loans, the Depositor cannot deliver all assumption,
modification, consolidation or extension agreements, if any, satisfying the requirements of clause
(iii) above, concurrently with the execution and delivery hereof because such document or
documents have not been returned from the applicable public recording office in the case of
clause (iii) above, the Depositor shall promptly deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee (or
a Custodian on behalf of the Trustee), such assumption, modification, consolidation or extension
agreement with evidence of recording indicated thereon upon receipt thereof from the public
recording office, but in no event shall any such delivery ofany such documents or instruments be
made later than one year following the Closing Date, unless there has been a continuing delay at
the applicable recording office and the Depositor has delivered the Officer's Certificate to such
effect to the Trustee (or a Custodian on behalf of the Trustee). The Depositor shall forward or
cause to be forwarded to the Trustee (or a Custodian on behalf of the Trustee)(1)from time to
time additional original documents evidencing an assumption or modification of a Mortgage
Loan and (2) any other documents required to be delivered by the Depositor or the Servicer to
-31-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE I76849v9
Mortgage Loans and the aggregated Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loans as
of the close of business on the Determination Date preceding such Distribution Date and
the date of acquisition of the REO Properties;
(xv) for each Loan Group, the total number and principal balance of any REO
Properties (and market value, if available) as of the close of business on the
Determination Date preceding such Distribution Date;
(xvi) for each Loan Group, the aggregate amount of Realized Losses incurred
during the preceding calendar month;
(xix) any expenses or indemnification amounts paid by the Trust, the specific
purpose of each payment and the parties to whom such payments were made;
(xx) any material modifications, extensions or waivers to Mortgage Loan
terms, fees, penalties or payments since the previous Distribution Date and cumulatively
since the Cut-off Date;
(xxi) for each Loan Group, the number and aggregate Stated Principal Balance
of Mortgage Loans, the weighted average Mortgage Interest Rate, the weighted average
remaining term, and cumulative Principal Prepayments, each as of the close of business
on the last day of the calendar month preceding such Distribution Date;
(xxii) unless such information is otherwise set forth in the Form 10-D relating to
such Distribution Date and provided that the Securities Administrator is reasonably able
to include such information in the statement, material breaches of Mortgage Loan
representations and warranties of which the Securities Administrator has knowledge or
has received written notice; and
(xxiii) unless such information is otherwise set forth in the Form 10-D relating to
such Distribution Date and provided that the Securities Administrator is reasonably able
to include such information in the statement, material breaches of any covenants under
this Agreement of which the Securities Administrator has knowledge or has received
written notice.
For all purposes of this Agreement, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, delinquencies
shall be determined and reported based on the so-called "MBA" methodology for determining
delinquencies on mortgage loans similar to the Mortgage Loans. By way of example, a
Mortgage Loan would be delinquent with respect to a Monthly Payment due on a Due Date if
such Monthly Payment is not made by the close of business on the Mortgage Loan's next
succeeding Due Date, and a Mortgage Loan would be more than 30-days delinquent with respect
to such Monthly Payment if such Monthly Payment were not made by the close of business on
the Mortgage Loan's second succeeding Due Date.
-79-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
(b) No later than each Distribution Date, tlie Securities Administrator, based upon
information supplied to it on the Servicer's Certificate, shall make available to each Holder of a
Certificate, each Rating Agency and the Servicer a statement setting forth the information set
forth in Section 5.04(a)(a "Monthly Statement").
In the case of information furnished pursuant to clauses (iii) and (iv) of Section 5.04(a),
the amounts shall be expressed as a dollar amount per Certificate with a $1,000 denomination.
On each Distribution Date, the Securities Administrator shall prepare and make available
to each Financial Market Service, in electronic or such other format and media mutually agreed
upon by the Securities Administrator, the Financial Market Service and the Depositor, the
information contained in the Servicer's Certificate described in Section 4.01 for such
Distribution Date.
Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, the Securities
Administrator shall furnish to each Person who at any time during the calendar year was the
Holder of a Certificate, if requested in writing by such Person, a statement containing the
information set forth in clauses (iii) and (iv) of Section 5.04(a), in each case aggregated for such
calendar year or applicable portion thereof during which such Person was a Certificateholder.
Such obligation of the Securities Administrator shall be deemed to have been satisfied to the
extent that substantially comparable information shall be provided by the Securities
Administrator pursuant to any requirements ofthe Code as from time to time in force.
The Securities Administrator shall deliver to the Holders of Certificates any reports or
information the Securities Administrator is required by this Agreement or the Code, Treasury
Regulations or REMIC Provisions to deliver to the Holders of Certificates, and the Securities
Administrator shall prepare and provide to the Certificateholders (by mail, telephone, or
publication as may be permitted by applicable Treasury Regulations) such other reasonable
information as the Securities Administrator deems necessary or appropriate or is required by the
Code, Treasury Regulations, and the REMIC Provisions including, but not limited to,
(i) information to be reported to the Holder of the Residual Certificate for quarterly notices on
Schedule Q (Form 1066)(which information shall be forwarded to the Holder of the Residual
Certificate by the Securities Administrator), (ii) information to be provided to the Holders of
Certificates with respect to amounts which should be included as interest and original issue
-80-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
discount in such Holders' gross income and (iii) information to be provided to all Holders of
Certificates setting forth the percentage of each REMIC's assets, determined in accordance with
Treasury Regulations using a convention, not inconsistent with Treasury Regulations, selected
by the Securities Administrator in its absolute discretion, that constitute real estate assets under
Section 856 of the Code, and assets described in Section 7701(a)('?)(C)of the Code; provided,
however, that in setting forth the percentage of such assets of each REMIC, nothing contained in
this Agreement, including without limitation Section 7.03 hereof, shall be interpreted to require
the Securities Administrator periodically to appraise the fair market values of the assets of the
Trust Estate or to indemnify the Trust Estate or any Certificateholders fix)m any adverse federal,
state or local tax consequences associated with a change subsequently required to be made in the
Depositor's initial good faith determinations of such fair market values (if subsequent
determinations are required pursuant to the REMIC Provisions) made from time to time.
Section 5.05. Tax Returns and Reports to Certificateholders.
(a) For federal income tax purposes, each REMIC shall have a calendar year taxable
year and shall maintain its books on the accrual method ofaccounting.
(b) The Securities Administrator shall prepare or cause to be prepared, shall execute
or cause to be executed by such Person as is required by the Code, Treasury Regulations or state
or local tax laws, regulations or rules and shall file or cause to be filed with the Internal Revenue
Service and applicable state or local tax authorities income tax and information returns for each
taxable year with respect to each REMIC containing such information at the times and in the
manner as may be required by the Code, the Treasury Regulations or state or local tax laws,
regulations, or rules, and shall furnish or cause to be furnished to each REMIC and the
Certificateholders the schedules, statements or information at such times and in such manner as
may be required thereby. Within thirty (30) days of the Closing Date, the Securities
Administrator shall obtain for each REMIC a taxpayer identification number on Form SS-4 and
any similarly required state or local forms or as otherwise permitted by the Internal Revenue
Service, and shall furnish or cause to be furnished to the Internal Revenue Service, on Form 8811
and any similarly required state or local forms or as otherwise required by the Code or the
Treasury Regulations, the name, title, address and telephone number of the person that Holders
ofthe Certificates may contact for tax information relating thereto, together with such additional
information at the time or times and in the manner required by the Code or the Treasury
Regulations. Such federal, state, or local income tax and information returns shall be signed by
the Trustee, or such other Person as may be required to sign such returns by the Code, the
Treasury Regulations or state or local tax laws, regulations, or rules.
(c) In the first federal income tax return (and any similar required state or local
income tax returns) of each REMIC for its short taxable year ending December 31, 2006,
REMIC status shall be elected for such taxable year and all succeeding taxable years.
(d) The Securities Administrator will maintain or cause to be maintained such records
relating to each REMIC, including but not limited to records relating to the income, expenses,
assets and liabilities ofthe Trust Estate, and the initial fair market value and adjusted basis ofthe
Trust Estate property and assets determined at such intervals as may be required by the Code or
-81-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
the Treasury Regulations, as may be necessary to prepare the foregoing returns, schedules,
statements or information.
The Tax Matters Person shall have the same duties with respect to the applicable REMIC
as those of a "tax matters partner" under Subchapter C of Chapter 63 of Subtitle F of the Code.
The Holder of the Class 1-A-R Certificate is hereby designated as the Tax Matters Person for
each of the Upper-Tier REMIC and the Lower-Tier REMIC. By its acceptance of the
Class 1-A-R Certificate, such Holder irrevocably appoints the Securities Administrator as its
agent to perform all of the duties of the Tax Matters Person for the Upper-Tier REMIC and the
Lower-Tier REMIC.
Section 5.07. Rights of the Tax Matters Person in Respect of the Securities
Administrator.
The Securities Administrator shall afford the Tax Matters Person, upon reasonable notice
during normal business hours, access to all records maintained by the Securities Administrator in
respect of its duties hereunder and access to officers of the Securities Administrator responsible
for performing such duties. Upon request, the Securities Administrator shall furnish the Tax
Matters Person with its most recent report of condition published pursuant to law or to the
requirements of its supervisory or examining authority publicly available. The Securities
Administrator shall make available to the Tax Matters Person such books, documents or records
relating to the Securities Administrator's services hereunder as the Tax Matters Person shall
reasonably request. The Tax Matters Person shall not have any responsibility or liability for any
action or failure to act by the Securities Administrator and is not obligated to supervise the
performance of the Securities Administrator under this Agreement or otherwise.
Section 5.08. REMIC Related Covenants.
For as long as any REMIC created hereunder shall exist, the Trustee, the Securities
Administrator, the Depositor and the Servicer shall act in accordance herewith to assure
continuing treatment of each REMIC created hereunder as a REMIC and avoid the imposition of
tax on each REMIC created hereunder. In particular:
(a) Neither the Securities Administrator nor the Trustee shall create, or permit the
creation of, any "interests" in any REMIC within the meaning of Code Section 860D(a)(2) other
than the interests represented by the Regular Certificates, the Residual Certificate and the
Uncertificated Lower-Tier Interests.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in the Code,(i) the Depositor and the Servicer shall
not contribute or allow to be contributed to the Trust Estate and the Trustee shall not accept
property unless substantially all ofthe property held in each REMIC constitutes either "qualified
mortgages" or "permitted investments" as defined in Code Sections 860G(a)(3) and (5),
respectively, and (ii) no property shall be contributed to any REMIC after the start-up day unless
such contribution would not subject the Trust Estate to the 100% tax on contributions to a
REMIC after the start-up day ofsuch REMIC imposed by Code Section 860G(d).
-82-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE 176849v9
(c) Neither the Securities Administrator, on behalf of the Trustee, nor the Trustee,
shall accept on behalf of any REMIC any fee or other compensation for services and none of the
Securities Administrator, the Trustee or the Servicer shall knowingly accept, on behalf of the
Trust Estate any income from assets other than those permitted to be held by a REMIC.
(d) Neither the Securities Administrator, on behalf of the Trustee, nor the Trustee,
shall sell or permit the sale of all or any portion ofthe Mortgage Loans(other than in accordance
with Sections 2.02 and 2.04), unless such sale is pursuant to a "qualified liquidation" of the
applicable REMIC as defined in Code Section 860F(a)(4)(A) and in accordance with Article X.
(e) The Securities Administrator shall maintain books with respect to the Trust and
each REMIC on a calendar year taxable year and on an accrual basis.
None of the Servicer, the Securities Administrator or the Trustee shall engage in a
"prohibited transaction" (as defined in Code Section 860F(a)(2)), except that, with the prior
written consent ofthe Servicer and the Depositor, the Securities Administrator may engage in the
activities otherwise prohibited by the foregoing paragraphs (b),(c)and (d); provided that the
Servicer shall have delivered to the Securities Administrator an Opinion of Counsel to the effect
that such transaction will not result in the imposition of a tax on any REMIC created hereunder
and will not disqualify any such REMIC from treatment as a REMIC; and,providedfurther, that
the Servicer shall have demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Securities Administrator that such
action will not adversely affect the rights of the Holders of the Certificates and the Securities
Administrator and that such action will not adversely impact the rating ofthe Certificates. None
of the Servicer, the Securities Administrator or the Trustee shall, unless the Mortgagor is in
default with respect to the Mortgage Loan or such default is, in the judgment of the Servicer,
reasonably foreseeable, permit any modification with respect to any Mortgage Loan that would
(i) change the Mortgage Rate, defer or forgive the payment thereof of any principal or interest
payments, reduce the Scheduled Principal Balance (except for actual payments of principal) or
extend the final maturity date with respect to such Mortgage Loan,(ii) affect adversely the status
of any REMIC as a REMIC or (iii) cause any REMIC to be subject to a tax on "prohibited
transactions" or "contributions" pursuant to the REMIC Provisions. Further, none of the
Servicer, the Securities Administrator or the Trustee shall permit any modification with respect
to any Mortgage Loan that would both (x) effect an exchange or reissuance of such Mortgage
Loan under Section 1.860G-2(b) of the Treasury regulations and (y)cause any REMIC
constituting part of the Trust Estate to fail to qualify as a REMIC under the Code or the
imposition of any tax on "prohibited transactions" or "contributions" after the Startup Day under
the REMIC Provisions.•
In the event that any REMIC created hereunder fails to qualify as a REMIC, loses its
status as a REMIC,or incurs federal, state or local taxes as a result of a prohibited transaction or
prohibited contribution under the REMIC Provisions due solely to (i) the negligent performance
by the Trustee of its duties and obligations set forth herein or (ii) any state, local or franchise
taxes imposed upon the Trust Estate as a result of the location of the Trustee or any co-trustee,
the Trustee shall indemnify the Trust Estate against any and all losses, claims, damages,
liabilities or expenses ("Losses") resulting from such negligence, including, without limitation,
-83-
53570.000183 CHARLOTTE I76849v9
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
FWP 1 file1.htm
PROSPECTUS
------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7 OF THIS
PROSPECTUS.
The certificates of each series will represent interests in the related issuing
entity only and will not be obligations of the depositor, the sponsor or any
other entity.
This prospectus may be used to offer and sell any series of certificates only if
accompanied by the prospectus supplement for that series. Please read both
documents carefully to understand the risks associated with these investments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 1/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o will be sold to the related issuing entity by the depositor, who will have
in turn purchased the mortgage loans from the sponsor;
o may be entitled to the benefit of one or more of the other types of credit
support or derivative instruments described in this prospectus and in more
detail in the accompanying prospectus supplement; and
o will be paid only from the assets of the related issuing entity.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED THE CERTIFICATES OR DETERMINED THAT THIS PROSPECTUS IS
ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
-----------------
JUNE 5, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND THE PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT................iii
SUMMARY OF TERMS...............................................................................................1
RISK FACTORS...................................................................................................7
Limited Source of Payments - No Recourse to Depositor, Sponsor, Master Servicer or Trustee..................7
Limited Liquidity for Certificates May Affect Your Ability to Resell Certificates...........................7
Certain Certificates May Not Be Appropriate For Individual Investors........................................8
Credit Enhancement is Limited in Amount and Coverage........................................................8
The Ratings of Your Certificates May Be Lowered or Withdrawn Which May Adversely Affect the Liquidity or
Market Value of Your Certificates...........................................................................9
Real Estate Market Conditions May Affect Mortgage Loan Performance..........................................9
Geographic Concentration May Increase Rates of Loss and Delinquency........................................10
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 2/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
General Economic Conditions May Increase Risk of Loss......................................................10
Collateral Securing Cooperative Loans May Diminish in Value................................................10
Leaseholds May Be Subject to Default Risk on the Underlying Lease..........................................11
Yields of Certificates Sensitive to Rate and Timing of Principal Prepayment................................11
Timing of Prepayments on the Mortgage Loans May Result in Interest Shortfalls on the Certificates..........12
Exercise of Rights Under Special Servicing Agreements May Be Adverse to Other Certificateholders...........12
Special Powers of the FDIC in the Event of Insolvency of the Sponsor Could Delay or Reduce Distributions
on the Certificates........................................................................................13
Insolvency of the Depositor May Delay or Reduce Collections on Mortgage Loans..............................14
Owners of Book-Entry Certificates are Not Entitled to Exercise Rights of Holders of Certificates...........14
Book-Entry System for Certain Classes of Certificates May Decrease Liquidity and Delay Payment.............15
Cash Flow Agreements and External Credit Enhancements are Subject to Counterparty Risk.....................15
Amounts Received from an Auction and a Related Swap Agreement May Be Insufficient to Assure Completion of
the Auction................................................................................................15
Servicing Transfer Following Event of Default May Result in Payment Delays or Losses.......................16
Effects of Failure to Comply With Consumer Protection Laws.................................................16
Increased Risk of Loss If Delinquent Mortgage Loans are Assets of a Trust..................................17
THE TRUST ESTATES.............................................................................................17
General....................................................................................................17
The Mortgage Loans.........................................................................................17
Mortgage Certificates......................................................................................22
Distribution Account.......................................................................................27
DESCRIPTION OF CERTIFICATES...................................................................................27
General....................................................................................................28
Definitive Form............................................................................................28
Book-entry Form............................................................................................29
Distributions..............................................................................................34
Categories of Classes of Certificates......................................................................35
Residual Certificates......................................................................................39
Mandatory Auction of Certificates..........................................................................40
Exchangeable Certificates..................................................................................40
Reports To Certificateholders..............................................................................42
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT............................................................................................44
General....................................................................................................44
Subordination..............................................................................................45
Limited Guarantee..........................................................................................45
Financial Guaranty Insurance Policy or Surety Bond.........................................................46
Letter of Credit...........................................................................................46
Mortgage Pool Insurance Policy.............................................................................46
Special Hazard Insurance Policy............................................................................47
Mortgagor Bankruptcy Bond..................................................................................48
Reserve Fund...............................................................................................48
Cross-Collateralization....................................................................................49
Overcollateralization......................................................................................49
Excess Interest............................................................................................49
Cash Flow Agreements.......................................................................................49
Fraud Waiver...............................................................................................50
FHA Insurance or VA Guarantee..............................................................................51
PREPAYMENT AND YIELD CONSIDERATIONS...........................................................................52
Factors Affecting Prepayment...............................................................................52
Effect of Principal Prepayments............................................................................52
Weighted Average Life of Certificates......................................................................52
Scheduled Delays In Distributions..........................................................................53
THE SPONSOR...................................................................................................54
THE DEPOSITOR.................................................................................................54
USE OF PROCEEDS...............................................................................................55
MORTGAGE PURCHASE PROGRAM.....................................................................................55
SERVICING OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS...............................................................................56
The Master Servicer........................................................................................56
The Servicers..............................................................................................57
THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT...........................................................................58
Assignment of Mortgage Loans to the Trustee................................................................59
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 3/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
The Trustee................................................................................................74
CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS...................................................................75
General....................................................................................................75
Condominiums...............................................................................................75
Cooperatives...............................................................................................76
Foreclosure................................................................................................76
Rights of Redemption.......................................................................................78
Anti-Deficiency Legislation, the Bankruptcy Code and Other Limitations On Lenders..........................78
Texas Home Equity Loans....................................................................................81
"Due-on-Sale" Clauses......................................................................................81
Applicability of Usury Laws................................................................................82
Forfeiture for Drug, RICO and Money Laundering Violations..................................................82
Homeowners Protection Act of 1998..........................................................................83
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Similar Laws...........................................................83
Environmental Considerations...............................................................................83
Enforceability of Certain Provisions.......................................................................86
BENEFIT PLAN CONSIDERATIONS...................................................................................86
General....................................................................................................86
Certain ERISA and Code Requirements........................................................................87
ERISA Administrative Exemptions............................................................................88
Non-ERISA Plans and Exempt Plans...........................................................................91
Unrelated Business Taxable Income--Residual Certificates...................................................91
LEGAL INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS...............................................................................91
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES...............................................................................93
Federal Income Tax Consequences for REMIC Certificates.....................................................94
Taxation of Regular Certificates...........................................................................96
Taxation of Residual Certificates.........................................................................102
Federal Income Tax Consequences for Certificates as to Which No REMIC Election Is Made....................112
Federal Income Tax Consequences for Exchangeable Certificates.............................................119
STATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS.....................................................................................120
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION.........................................................................................120
USE OF PROCEEDS..............................................................................................122
FINANCIAL INFORMATION........................................................................................122
LEGAL MATTERS................................................................................................122
RATING.......................................................................................................122
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS................................................................................122
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE............................................................122
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION..........................................................................123
ii
YOU SHOULD RELY ON THE INFORMATION IN THE PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT FOR THE TERMS OF
YOUR SERIES OF CERTIFICATES.
You should rely only on the information in this prospectus and the
accompanying prospectus supplement including the information incorporated by
reference. No one has been authorized to provide different information to you.
The certificates are not being offered in any state where the offer is not
permitted. The depositor does not claim the accuracy of the information in this
prospectus or the accompanying prospectus supplement as of any date other than
the dates stated on their covers.
prospectus supplement to captions in these materials where you can find further
related discussions. The foregoing table of contents and the table of contents
included in the accompanying prospectus supplement provide the pages on which
these captions are located.
You can find a listing of the pages where capitalized terms used in this
prospectus are defined under the caption "Index of Terms" beginning on page 124
of this prospectus.
The depositor's principal executive offices are located at 214 North Tryon
Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255 and the depositor's phone number is
(704) 386-2400.
iii
SUMMARY OF TERMS
RELEVANT PARTIES
ISSUING ENTITY
DEPOSITOR
Banc of America Funding Corporation will serve as the depositor for each
series of certificates. The depositor is an indirect subsidiary of Bank of
America Corporation. It is not expected that the depositor will have any
business operations other than offering certificates and related activities.
SPONSOR
Bank of America, National Association will serve as the sponsor for each
series of certificates. The depositor will acquire the collateral that will
serve as security for a series from the sponsor. The sponsor is an affiliate of
the depositor and may be an affiliate of a servicer.
SERVICER(S)
MASTER SERVICER
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 5/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
The related prospectus supplement may provide for a master servicer for
that series of certificates. The master servicer will supervise the servicers. A
master servicer may be an affiliate of the depositor, the sponsor, a servicer
and/or an originator.
TRUSTEE
Each trust will own the assets specified in the related prospectus
supplement. These assets will consist of any combination of the following items:
The related prospectus supplement will specify the cut-off date after
which the trust is entitled to receive collections on the mortgage loans and/or
mortgage certificates that it holds.
MORTGAGE LOANS
Each trust will own the related mortgage loans (other than the fixed
retained yield, which is the portion of the mortgage interest rate, if any, not
contained in the trust).
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 6/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
A trust may include one or more of the following types of mortgage loans:
o fixed-rate loans;
o adjustable-rate loans;
o subsidy loans;
o balloon loans.
You should refer to the applicable prospectus supplement for the precise
characteristics or expected characteristics of the Mortgage Loans included in a
trust.
MORTGAGE CERTIFICATES
THE CERTIFICATES
INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS
Interest will accrue at the pass-through rate for each class indicated in
the applicable prospectus supplement on its outstanding class balance or
notional amount.
PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTIONS
DISTRIBUTION DATES
RECORD DATES
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
SUBORDINATION
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 8/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
However, subordination does not provide full assurance that there will be
no losses on the senior certificates.
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
o fraud waiver; or
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 9/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
FORMS OF CERTIFICATES
OPTIONAL TERMINATION
If an election is made to treat the related trust estate (or one or more
segregated pools of assets in the trust estate) as one or more "real estate
mortgage investment conduits," any optional purchase will be permitted only
pursuant to a "qualified liquidation," as defined under Section 860F(a)(4)(A) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Exercise of the right of purchase will cause the early retirement of some
or all of the certificates of that series.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 10/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
TAX STATUS
The treatment of the certificates for federal income tax purposes will
depend on:
o if one or more REMIC elections are made, whether the certificates are
regular interests or residual interests; and
If one or more REMIC elections are made, certificates that are regular
interests will be treated as newly issued debt instruments of the REMIC and must
be accounted for under an accrual method of accounting. Certificates that are
residual interests are not treated as debt instruments, but rather must be
treated according to the rules prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code for REMIC
residual interests, including restrictions on transfer and the reporting of net
income or loss of the REMIC, including the possibility of a holder of such
certificate having taxable income without a corresponding distribution of cash
to pay taxes currently due.
LEGAL INVESTMENT
RATING
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 11/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o Ratings do not address the effect of prepayments on the yield you may
anticipate when you purchase your certificates.
RISK FACTORS
Except for any related insurance policies and any reserve fund or credit
enhancement described in the applicable prospectus supplement:
o a secondary market for the certificates of any series may not develop,
or if it does, it may not provide you with liquidity of investment or
it may not continue for the life of the certificates of any series;
As a result, you may not be able to sell your certificates or you may not
be able to sell your certificates at a high enough price to produce your desired
return on investment.
If you are an individual investor who does not have sufficient resources
or expertise to evaluate the particular characteristics of a class of
certificates, certain certificates of a series may not be an appropriate
investment for you. This may be the case because, among other things:
o the rate of principal distributions on, and the weighted average lives
of, the certificates will be sensitive to the uncertain rate and
timing of principal prepayments on the applicable mortgage loans and
the priority of principal distributions among the classes of
certificates. Because of this, the certificates may be inappropriate
investments for you if you require a distribution of a particular
amount of principal on a specific date or an otherwise predictable
stream of distributions;
o a secondary market for the certificates may not develop or provide you
with liquidity of investment; and
o you must pay tax on any interest or original issue discount in the
year it accrues, even if the cash is paid to you in a different year.
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
o fraud waiver; or
None of the depositor, the sponsor or any of their affiliates will have
any obligation to replace or supplement any credit enhancement, or to take any
other action to maintain any rating of any class of certificates.
THE RATINGS OF YOUR CERTIFICATES MAY BE LOWERED OR WITHDRAWN WHICH MAY ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE LIQUIDITY OR MARKET VALUE OF YOUR CERTIFICATES
The ability of mortgagors to make payments on the mortgage loans may also
be affected by factors that do not necessarily affect property values, such as
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 15/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
10
payment obligations arising under its blanket mortgage, the mortgagee holding
the blanket mortgage could foreclose on that mortgage and terminate all
subordinate proprietary leases and occupancy agreements. In addition, the
blanket mortgage on a cooperative may provide financing in the form of a
mortgage that does not fully amortize, with a significant portion of principal
being due in one lump sum at final maturity. The inability of the cooperative to
refinance this mortgage, and its consequent inability to make such final
payment, could lead to foreclosure by the mortgagee providing the financing. A
foreclosure in either event by the holder of the blanket mortgage could
eliminate or significantly diminish the value of the collateral securing the
cooperative loans.
the leasehold estate could terminate, leaving the leasehold mortgagee without
its security. The ground lease may terminate, if, among other reasons, the
ground lessee breaches or defaults in its obligations under the ground lease or
there is a bankruptcy of the ground lessee or the ground lessor. Any leasehold
mortgages underlying a series of certificates will contain provisions protective
of the mortgagee, as described under "The Trust Estates--The Mortgage Loans,"
such as the right of the leasehold mortgagee to receive notices from the ground
lessor of any defaults by the mortgagor and to cure those defaults, with
adequate cure periods; if a default is not susceptible of cure by the leasehold
mortgagee, the right to acquire the leasehold estate through foreclosure or
otherwise; the ability of the ground lease to be assigned to and by the
leasehold mortgagee or purchaser at a foreclosure sale and for the simultaneous
release of the ground lessee's liabilities under the new lease; and the right of
the leasehold mortgagee to enter into a new ground lease with the ground lessor
on the same terms and conditions as the old ground lease upon a termination.
The yield on the certificates of each series will depend in part on the
rate and timing of principal payment on the mortgage loans, including
prepayments, liquidations due to defaults and mortgage loan repurchases. Your
yield may be adversely affected, depending upon whether a particular certificate
is purchased at a premium or a discount, by a higher or lower than anticipated
rate of prepayments on the related mortgage loans. In particular:
11
you expected, your yield will be lower than you expected. Further information
relating to yield on those certificates will be included in the applicable
prospectus supplement, including a table demonstrating the particular
sensitivity of any class of principal only certificates to the rate of
prepayments.
payments on the mortgage loans or, in the case of any interest only certificates
entitled to a portion of interest paid on certain mortgage loans with higher
mortgage interest rate, those mortgage loans, occur at a rate faster than you
expected, your yield may be lower than you expected. If you are purchasing
interest only certificates, you should consider the risk that a rapid rate of
principal payments on the applicable mortgage loans could result in your failure
to recover your initial investment. Further information relating to yield on
those certificates will be included in the applicable prospectus supplement,
including, in the case of interest only certificates that are extremely
sensitive to principal prepayments, a table demonstrating the particular
sensitivity of those interest only certificates to the rate of prepayments.
If you are purchasing any inverse floating rate certificates, you should
also consider the risk that a high rate of the applicable index may result in a
lower actual yield than you expected or a negative yield. In particular, you
should consider the risk that high constant rates of the applicable index or
high constant prepayment rates on the mortgage loans may result in the failure
to recover your initial investment. Further information relating to yield on
those certificates will be included in the applicable prospectus supplement,
including a table demonstrating the particular sensitivity of those certificates
to the rate of prepayments on the mortgage loans and changes in the applicable
index.
The pooling and servicing agreement for a series will permit a servicer to
enter into a special servicing agreement with an unaffiliated holder of a class
of subordinate certificates or a class of securities backed by a class of
subordinate certificates, pursuant to which the holder may instruct the servicer
to commence or delay foreclosure proceedings with respect to delinquent mortgage
loans. This right is intended to permit the holder of a class of certificates
that is highly sensitive to losses on the mortgage loans to attempt to mitigate
losses by exercising limited power of direction over servicing activities which
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 18/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
12
SPECIAL POWERS OF THE FDIC IN THE EVENT OF INSOLVENCY OF THE SPONSOR COULD DELAY
OR REDUCE DISTRIBUTIONS ON THE CERTIFICATES
o alter the terms on which the sponsor continues to service the mortgage
loans, including the amount or the priority of the fees paid to the
sponsor as servicer.
13
Certain banking laws and regulations may apply not only to the sponsor but
to its subsidiaries as well. Arguments can also be made that the FDIC's rights
and powers extend to the depositor, the sponsor and the issuing entity and that,
as a consequence, the FDIC could repudiate or otherwise directly affect the
rights of the certificate holders under the transaction documents. If the FDIC
were to take this position, delays or reductions on payments to certificate
holders could occur.
Neither the United States Bankruptcy Code nor similar applicable state
laws prohibit the depositor from filing a voluntary application for relief under
these laws. However, the transactions contemplated by this prospectus and the
related prospectus supplement will be structured so that the voluntary or
involuntary application for relief under the bankruptcy laws by the depositor is
unlikely. The depositor is a separate, limited purpose subsidiary, the
certificate of incorporation of which contains limitations on the nature of the
depositor's business, including the ability to incur debt other than debt
associated with the transactions contemplated by this prospectus, and
restrictions on the ability of the depositor to commence voluntary or
involuntary cases or proceedings under bankruptcy laws without the prior
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 20/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
unanimous affirmative vote of all its directors (who are required to consider
the interests of the depositor's creditors, in addition to the depositor's
stockholders, in connection with the filing of a voluntary application for
relief under applicable insolvency laws). Further, the transfer of the mortgage
loans to the related trust will be structured so that the trustee has no
recourse to the depositor, other than for breaches of representations and
warranties about the mortgage loans.
14
BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF CERTIFICATES MAY DECREASE LIQUIDITY AND
DELAY PAYMENT
15
costs of effecting the servicing transfer from the predecessor master servicer
or servicer, or from the assets of the related trust if the predecessor fails to
pay. In the event that reimbursement to the trustee or the successor master
servicer or servicer is made from trust assets, the resulting shortfall will be
borne by holders of the related certificates, to the extent not covered by any
applicable credit support. In addition, during the pendency of a servicing
transfer or for some time thereafter, mortgagors of the related mortgage loans
may delay making their monthly payments or may inadvertently continue making
payments to the predecessor servicer, potentially resulting in delays in
distributions on the related certificates.
There are various federal and state laws, public policies and principles
of equity that protect consumers. Among other things, these laws, policies and
principles:
16
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 23/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
GENERAL
The Trust Estate will not include the portion of interest on the Mortgage
Loans which constitutes the Fixed Retained Yield, if any. See "The Pooling and
Servicing Agreement--Fixed Retained Yield, Servicing Compensation and Payment of
Expenses."
GENERAL
The mortgaged properties securing the Mortgage Loans may be located in any
one of the fifty states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico or any
other territory of the United States.
The Mortgage Loans in a Trust Estate will have monthly payment dates as
set forth in the related prospectus supplement. The payment terms of the
Mortgage Loans to be included in a Trust Estate will be described in the related
prospectus supplement and will be one of the following types of mortgage loans:
17
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 24/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
these converted Mortgage Loans at the price set forth in the applicable
prospectus supplement. A Trust Estate containing fixed-rate Mortgage Loans
may contain convertible Mortgage Loans which have converted from an
adjustable interest rate prior to the formation of the Trust Estate and which
are subject to no further conversions.
18
these Mortgage Loans with the present value of the resulting difference in
payment ("SUBSIDY PAYMENTS") being provided by the employer of the mortgagor,
generally on an annual basis. Subsidy Payments will generally be placed in a
custodial account ("SUBSIDY ACCOUNT") by the related Servicer. Despite the
existence of a subsidy program, a mortgagor remains primarily liable for
making all scheduled payments on a Subsidy Loan and for all other obligations
provided for in the related mortgage note and Mortgage Loan.
19
except that, in the case of Mortgage Loans the proceeds of which were used
to refinance an existing mortgage loan, the appraised value of the related
mortgaged property is the appraised value determined in an appraisal
obtained at the time of refinancing; or
20
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 28/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o the maximum and minimum interest rates on the Mortgage Loans; and
o townhouses;
o rowhouses;
21
o vacation homes;
o second homes;
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 29/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o investment properties;
o manufactured housing.
In the case of leasehold interests, the term of the leasehold will exceed
the scheduled maturity of the Mortgage Loan by at least five years. Certain
Mortgage Loans may be originated or acquired in connection with corporate
programs, including employee relocation programs. In limited instances, a
borrower who uses the dwelling unit as a primary residence may also make some
business use of the property.
MORTGAGE CERTIFICATES
A Trust Estate that contains Mortgage Certificates will have either Ginnie
Mae Certificates, Freddie Mac Certificates, Fannie Mae Certificates, Private
Certificates or a combination of any of those types of Mortgage Certificates.
The Mortgage Certificates will be acquired by the Depositor from one or more
affiliated or unaffiliated sellers.
The descriptions of Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Certificates
and of Private Certificates that are set forth below are descriptions of
certificates representing proportionate interests in a pool of mortgage loans
and in the payments of principal and interest from that pool. Ginnie Mae,
Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or the issuer of a particular series of Private
Certificates may also issue mortgage-backed securities representing a right to
receive distributions of interest only or principal only or disproportionate
distributions of principal or interest, or to receive distributions of principal
and/or interest prior or subsequent to distributions on other certificates
representing interests in the same pool of mortgage loans. In addition, any
issuer may issue certificates representing interests in mortgage loans having
characteristics that are different from the types of mortgage loans described
below. The terms of any Mortgage Certificates that are included in a Trust
Estate (and of the underlying mortgage loans) will be described in the related
prospectus supplement, and the descriptions that follow are subject to
modification as appropriate to reflect the actual terms of those Mortgage
Certificates.
22
GINNIE MAE
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 30/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Section 306(g) of the Housing Act provides that "the full faith and credit
of the United States is pledged to the payment of all amounts which may be
required to be paid under any guaranty under this subsection." To meet its
obligations under its guaranties, Ginnie Mae is authorized, under Section 306(d)
of the Housing Act, to borrow from the United States Treasury with no
limitations as to amount.
All of the Ginnie Mae Certificates (the "GINNIE MAE CERTIFICATES") will be
mortgage-backed certificates issued and serviced by Ginnie Mae- or Fannie
Mae-approved mortgage servicers. The mortgage loans underlying Ginnie Mae
Certificates may consist of FHA Loans secured by mortgages on one- to four
family residential properties or multifamily residential properties, loans
secured by mortgages on one- to four-family residential properties or
multifamily residential properties, mortgage loans which are partially
guaranteed by the VA and other mortgage loans eligible for inclusion in mortgage
pools underlying Ginnie Mae Certificates. At least 90% by original principal
amount of the mortgage loans underlying a Ginnie Mae Certificate will be
mortgage loans having maturities of 20 years or more.
The Ginnie Mae Certificates included in a Trust Estate may be issued under
either or both of the Ginnie Mae I program ("GINNIE MAE I CERTIFICATES") and the
Ginnie Mae II program ("GINNIE MAE II CERTIFICATES"). All mortgages underlying a
particular Ginnie Mae I Certificate must have the same annual interest rate
(except for pools of mortgages secured by mobile homes). The annual interest
rate on each Ginnie Mae I Certificate is one-half percentage point less than the
annual interest rate on the mortgage loans included in the pool of mortgages
backing the Ginnie Mae I Certificate. Mortgages underlying a particular Ginnie
Mae II Certificate may have annual interest rates that vary from each other by
up to one percentage point. The annual interest rate on each Ginnie Mae II
Certificate will be between one-half percentage point and one and one-half
percentage points less than the highest annual interest rate on the mortgage
loans included in the pool of mortgages backing the Ginnie Mae II Certificate.
Ginnie Mae will have approved the issuance of each of the Ginnie Mae
Certificates in accordance with a guaranty agreement between Ginnie Mae and the
servicer of the mortgage loans underlying the Ginnie Mae Certificate. Pursuant
to this type of agreement, the servicer is required to advance its own funds to
make timely payments of all amounts due on the Ginnie Mae Certificate, even if
the payments received by the servicer on the mortgage loans backing the Ginnie
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 31/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Mae Certificate are less than the amounts due on the Ginnie Mae Certificate. If
a servicer is unable to make payments on a Ginnie Mae Certificate as it becomes
due, it must promptly notify Ginnie Mae and request Ginnie Mae to make the
payment. Upon notification and request, Ginnie Mae will make the payments
directly to the registered holder of the Ginnie Mae Certificate. If no payment
is made by the servicer and the servicer fails to notify and request Ginnie Mae
to make the payment, the registered holder of the Ginnie Mae Certificate has
recourse only against Ginnie Mae to obtain the payment. The registered holder of
the Ginnie Mae
23
FREDDIE MAC
Freddie Mac Certificates are issued and maintained and may be transferred
only on the book-entry system of a Federal Reserve Bank and may only be held of
record by entities eligible to maintain book-entry accounts at a Federal Reserve
Bank. Beneficial owners will hold Freddie Mac Certificates ordinarily through
one or more financial intermediaries. The rights of a beneficial owner of a
Freddie Mac Certificate against Freddie Mac or a Federal Reserve Bank may be
exercised only through the Federal Reserve Bank on whose book-entry system the
Freddie Mac Certificate is held.
Under its Cash and Guarantor Programs, Freddie Mac guarantees to each
registered holder of a Freddie Mac Certificate the timely payment of interest at
the rate provided for by the Freddie Mac Certificate on the registered holder's
pro rata share of the unpaid principal balance outstanding of the related
mortgage loans, whether or not received. Freddie Mac also guarantees to each
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 32/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
24
012, the range between the lowest and highest annual interest rates on the
mortgage loans does not exceed two percentage points.
Freddie Mac Certificates are not guaranteed by the United States or by any
Federal Home Loan Bank and do not constitute debts or obligations of the United
States or any Federal Home Loan Bank. The obligations of Freddie Mac under its
guarantee are obligations solely of Freddie Mac and are not backed by, nor
entitled to, the full faith and credit of the United States.
FANNIE MAE
PRIVATE CERTIFICATES
25
part of either the principal distributions (but not the interest distributions)
or the interest distributions (but not the principal distributions) or in some
portion of the principal and interest distributions (but not all of those
distributions) or certain mortgage loans. The Private Certificates will have
previously been (1) offered and distributed to the public pursuant to an
effective registration statement or (2) purchased in a transaction not involving
any public offering from a person who is not an affiliate of the issuer of those
securities at the time of sale (nor an affiliate thereof at any time during the
three preceding months); provided that a period of two years has elapsed since
the later of the date the securities were acquired from the issuer or one of its
affiliates. Although individual Underlying Loans may be insured or guaranteed by
the United States or an agency or instrumentality thereof, they need not be, and
the Private Certificates themselves will not be so insured or guaranteed. The
seller/servicer of the underlying mortgage loans will have entered into a
pooling and servicing agreement, an indenture or similar agreement (a "PC
AGREEMENT") with the trustee under that PC Agreement (the "PC TRUSTEE"). The PC
Trustee or its agent, or a custodian, will possess the mortgage loans underlying
those Private Certificates. The mortgage loans underlying the Private
Certificates may be subserviced by one or more loan servicing institutions under
the supervision of a master servicer (the "PC SERVICER").
The prospectus supplement for a series for which the Trust Estate includes
Private Certificates will specify (this disclosure may be on an approximate
basis and will be as of the date specified in the related prospectus supplement)
to the extent relevant and to the extent the information is reasonably available
to the Depositor and the Depositor reasonably believes the information to be
reliable:
26
o the terms on which the underlying mortgage loans for the Private
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 35/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT
o each distribution or monthly payment, as the case may be, made to the
Trustee with respect to the Mortgage Assets;
o the amount of cash, if any, withdrawn from any related reserve fund or
other fund; and
The pooling and servicing agreement for a series may authorize the Trustee
to invest the funds in the Distribution Account in certain investments that will
qualify as "permitted investments" under Code Section 860G(a)(5) in the case of
REMIC Certificates. These eligible investments will generally mature not later
than the business day immediately preceding the next Distribution Date for the
series (or, in certain cases, on the Distribution Date). Eligible investments
include, among other investments, obligations of the United States and certain
of its agencies, federal funds, certificates of deposit, commercial paper
carrying the ratings specified in the related pooling and servicing agreement of
each rating agency rating the Certificates of that series that has rated the
commercial paper, demand and time deposits and banker's acceptances sold by
eligible commercial banks, certain repurchase agreements of United States
government securities and certain minimum reinvestment agreements. Reinvestment
earnings, if any, on funds in the Distribution Account generally will belong to
the Trustee.
DESCRIPTION OF CERTIFICATES
27
GENERAL
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 36/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o on a different basis;
in each case as specified in the related prospectus supplement. The timing and
amounts of distributions may vary among classes or over time as specified in the
related prospectus supplement.
DEFINITIVE FORM
In the event that an election or multiple elections are made to treat the
Trust Estate (or one or more segregated pools of assets of the Trust Estate) as
one or more REMICs, the Residual Certificate will be issued as a Definitive
Certificate. No legal or beneficial interest in all or any portion of any
"residual interest" may be transferred without the receipt by the transferor and
the Trustee of an affidavit signed by the transferee stating, among other
things, that the transferee (1) is not a disqualified organization within the
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 37/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
28
as they come due in the future and (c) intends to pay taxes associated with
holding the residual interest as they become due. The transferor must certify to
the Trustee that, as of the time of the transfer, it has no actual knowledge
that any of the statements made in the transferee affidavit are false and no
reason to know that the statements made by the transferee pursuant to clauses
(a), (b) and (c) of the preceding sentence are false. See "Federal Income Tax
Consequences--Federal Income Tax Consequences for REMIC Certificates--Taxation
of Residual Certificates----Tax--Related Restrictions on Transfer of Residual
Certificates."
BOOK-ENTRY FORM
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 38/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
29
with its rules and procedures and within established deadlines (European time).
The relevant European international clearing system will, if the transaction
meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to the Relevant
Depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering
or receiving securities in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance
with normal procedures for same day funds settlement applicable to DTC.
Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants may not deliver instructions
directly to the European Depositaries.
DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the
State of New York, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing
corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a
"clearing agency" registered pursuant to Section 17A, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. DTC performs services for its Participants, some of
which (and/or their representatives) own DTC. In accordance with its normal
procedures, DTC is expected to record the positions held by each DTC Participant
in the Book-Entry Certificates, whether held for its own account or as a nominee
for another person. In general, beneficial ownership of Book-Entry Certificates
will be subject to the Rules, as in effect from time to time.
30
80 countries, including all major European countries, Canada and the United
States. Indirect access to Clearstream is available to other institutions which
clear through or maintain custodial relationship with an account holder of
Clearstream.
The Euroclear System was created in 1968 to hold securities for its
Participants and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear Participants
through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from
lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Transactions may be
settled in a variety of currencies, including United States dollars. Euroclear
provides various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and
interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the
arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described above. Euroclear is
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 40/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
DTC has advised the Depositor that, unless and until Definitive
Certificates are issued, DTC will take any action the holders of the Book-Entry
Certificates are permitted to take under the pooling and servicing agreement
only at the direction of one or more DTC Participants to whose DTC accounts the
Book-Entry Certificates are credited, to the extent that these actions are taken
on behalf of Financial Intermediaries whose holdings include the Book-Entry
Certificates. Clearstream or the Euroclear Operator, as the case may be, will
take any other action permitted to be taken by a Certificateholder under the
pooling and servicing agreement on behalf of a Clearstream Participant or
Euroclear Participant only in accordance with its relevant rules and procedures
and subject to the ability of the Relevant Depositary to effect these actions on
its behalf through DTC. DTC may take actions, at the
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 41/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
31
None of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, any Servicers or the Trustee
will have any responsibility for any aspect of the records relating to or
payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests of the Book-Entry
Certificates held by Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, or for maintaining,
supervising or reviewing any records relating to those beneficial ownership
interests. In the event of the insolvency of DTC, a DTC Participant or an
Indirect DTC Participant in whose name Book-Entry Certificates are registered,
the ability of the Beneficial Owners of the Book-Entry Certificates to obtain
timely payment and, if the limits of applicable insurance coverage by the
Securities Investor Protection Corporation are exceeded or if the coverage is
otherwise unavailable, ultimate payment, of amounts distributable with respect
to the Book-Entry Certificates may be impaired.
32
Since the settlement is taking place during New York business hours, DTC
Participants can employ their usual procedures for sending Book-Entry
Certificates to the respective European Depositary for the benefit of
Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants. The sale proceeds will be
available to the DTC seller on the settlement date. Thus, to the DTC
Participants a cross-market transaction will settle no differently than a trade
between two DTC Participants.
Finally, day traders that use Clearstream or Euroclear and that purchase
Book-Entry Certificates from DTC Participants for delivery to Clearstream
Participants or Euroclear Participants should note that these trades would
automatically fail on the sale side unless affirmative action were taken. At
least three techniques should be readily available to eliminate this potential
problem:
33
(c) staggering the value dates for the buy and sell sides of the
trade so that the value date for the purchase from the DTC Participant is
at least one day prior to the value date for the sale to the Clearstream
Participant or Euroclear Participant.
In addition, all holders, including holders that are U.S. Persons, holding
Book-Entry Certificates through Clearstream, Euroclear or DTC may be subject to
backup withholding unless the holder provides appropriate documentation or
otherwise qualifies for an exemption. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences"
herein, and in particular "--Taxation of Certain Foreign Investors."
for specific tax advice concerning their holding and disposing of Book-Entry
Certificates. Each certificateholder is encouraged to consult its tax advisors
regarding the tax documentation and certifications that must be provided to
secure the exemption from United States withholding taxes.
DISTRIBUTIONS
INTEREST
34
PRINCIPAL
35
PRINCIPAL TYPES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 46/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Certificates.
36
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 47/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
class of Planned Amortization Certificates.
Typically, the Support Certificates for the
applicable series of Certificates generally will
represent a smaller percentage of a class of
Scheduled Amortization Certificates than the Support
Certificates generally would represent in relation
to a Planned Amortization Certificate or a Targeted
Amortization Certificate. A Scheduled Amortization
Certificate generally is less sensitive to
prepayments than a Support Certificate, but is more
sensitive than a class of Planned Amortization
Certificates or Targeted Amortization Certificates.
37
SUPER SENIOR CERTIFICATES A class of Senior Certificates that will not bear
its share of certain losses, after the Subordinate
Certificates are no longer outstanding, for so long
as one or more specified classes of Senior
Certificates are outstanding.
SUPER SENIOR SUPPORT CERTIFICATES A class of Senior Certificates that bears certain
losses that otherwise would have been allocated to a
class of Super Senior Certificates.
INTEREST TYPES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 48/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
38
PRINCIPAL-ONLY CERTIFICATES OR PO CERTIFICATES A class of Certificates that does not bear interest
and is entitled to receive only distributions in
respect of principal.
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES
39
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 49/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
See "Risk Factors--Amounts Received from the Auction and the Swap
Agreement May Be Insufficient to Assure Completion of the Auction" in this
prospectus.
EXCHANGEABLE CERTIFICATES
40
41
or such other entity identified in the related prospectus supplement will become
irrevocable on the second day prior to the proposed exchange date specified in
the related prospectus supplement. Any Exchangeable Certificates that are
Book-Entry Certificates will be subject to DTC's Rules.
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
42
(x) for any Mortgage Loan that became and REO Property during
the preceding calendar month, the loan number and Stated Principal Balance
of the Mortgage Loan as of the close of business on the Determination Date
preceding the Distribution Date and the date of acquisition thereof;
(xi) the total number and principal balance of any REO Properties
(and market value, if available) as of the close of business on the
Determination Date preceding the Distribution Date;
43
Where applicable, any amount set forth above may be expressed as a dollar
amount per single Certificate of the relevant class specified in the related
prospectus supplement. The report to certificateholders for any series of
Certificates may include additional or other information of a similar nature to
that specified above.
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
GENERAL
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
o fraud waiver; or
If losses occur which exceed the amount covered by credit enhancement or which
are not covered by the credit enhancement, certificateholders will bear their
allocable share of any deficiencies.
44
the provider, the general character of the business of the provider and
financial information required by Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB (17 C.F.R.
ss. 229.1114). Copies of the limited guarantee, financial guaranty insurance
policy, surety bond, letter of credit, pool insurance policy, mortgagor
bankruptcy bond, special hazard insurance policy or Cash Flow Agreement, if any,
relating to a series of Certificates will be filed with the SEC as an exhibit to
a Current Report on Form 8-K.
SUBORDINATION
LIMITED GUARANTEE
45
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 56/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
LETTER OF CREDIT
nonpayment.
46
interest rate to the date of payment of the claim plus certain Advances
exceeds the proceeds received from an approved sale of the Mortgaged Property,
in either case net of certain amounts paid or assumed to have been paid under
any related primary mortgage insurance policy.
The original amount of coverage under each mortgage pool insurance policy
will be reduced over the life of the related series of Certificates by the
aggregate amount of claims paid, less the aggregate of the net amounts realized
by the pool insurer upon disposition of all foreclosed properties. The amount of
claims paid includes some expenses incurred by the related Servicer or Master
Servicer as well as accrued interest on delinquent Mortgage Loans to the date of
payment of the claim. Accordingly, if aggregate net claims paid under any
mortgage pool insurance policy reach the original policy limit, coverage under
that mortgage pool insurance policy will be exhausted and any further losses
will be borne by the related Certificates, to the extent not covered by other
credit enhancement.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 58/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Any insurance policy covering special hazard losses obtained for a Trust
will be issued by the insurer named in the related prospectus supplement. Each
special hazard insurance policy will be subject to limitations described in this
paragraph and in the related prospectus supplement, if any, and will protect the
related Certificateholders from special hazard losses. Aggregate claims under a
special hazard insurance policy will be limited to the amount set forth in the
related pooling and servicing agreement and will be subject to reduction as
described in the related pooling and servicing agreement. A special hazard
insurance policy will provide that no claim may be paid unless hazard insurance
and, if applicable, flood insurance on the Mortgaged Property securing the
Mortgage Loan has been kept in force and other protection and preservation
expenses have been paid by the related Servicer or Master Servicer, as the case
may be.
47
rate to the date of claim settlement and certain expenses incurred by the
related Servicer or the Master Servicer, as the case may be, with respect to the
related Mortgaged Property.
RESERVE FUND
48
CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION
which that class has no interest. The applicable prospectus supplement for a
series that includes a cross-collateralization feature will describe its
specific operation.
OVERCOLLATERALIZATION
EXCESS INTEREST
49
FRAUD WAIVER
by the Sponsor for the amount of any loss paid by the issuer of the pool
insurance policy under the terms of the waiver letter. The maximum aggregate
amount of these fraud losses covered under the waiver letter and the period of
time during which the coverage will be provided will be specified in the related
prospectus supplement.
50
Under Section 235, assistance payments are paid by HUD to the mortgagee on
behalf of eligible mortgagors for as long as the mortgagors continue to be
eligible for the payments. To be eligible, a mortgagor must be part of a family,
have income within the limits prescribed by HUD at the time of initial
occupancy, occupy the property and meet requirements for recertification at
least annually.
dollar limit established by the VA. The liability on the guaranty is reduced or
increased pro rata with any reduction or increase in the amount of indebtedness,
but in no event will the amount payable on the guaranty exceed the amount of the
original guaranty. Notwithstanding the dollar and percentage limitations of the
guaranty, a mortgagee will ordinarily suffer a monetary loss only when the
difference between the unsatisfied indebtedness and the proceeds of a
foreclosure sale of mortgaged premises is greater than the original guaranty as
adjusted. The VA may, at its option, and without regard to the guaranty, make
full payment to a mortgagee of the unsatisfied indebtedness on a mortgage upon
its assignment to the VA.
51
52
each table. Any table will be based upon a number of assumptions stated in the
prospectus supplement, including assumptions that prepayments on the mortgage
loans underlying the related Mortgage Certificates or on the Mortgage Loans are
made at rates corresponding to various percentages of the specified prepayment
model. It is unlikely, however, that the prepayment of the mortgage loans
underlying the Mortgage Certificates, or of the Mortgage Loans, underlying any
series will conform to any of the percentages of the prepayment model described
in a table.
may not rise or fall in direct relation to changes in mortgage interest rates.
It should be noted that Certificates of a series may evidence an interest in a
Trust Estate with Mortgage Loans with different mortgage interest rates.
53
THE SPONSOR
Bank of America and its affiliates have been active in the securitization
market since inception, and Bank of America has sponsored publicly offered
securitization transactions since 1977. Bank of America and its affiliates have
been involved with the origination of auto loans, student loans, home equity
loans, credit card receivables, manufactured housing contracts, residential
mortgage loans and commercial mortgage loans, as well as less traditional asset
classes. Bank of America and its affiliates have also participated in a variety
of collateralized loan obligation transactions, synthetic securitizations, and
asset-backed commercial paper programs. Bank of America and its affiliates have
served as sponsors, issuers, dealers, and servicers in a wide array of
securitization transactions.
The table below sets forth the number and aggregate principal balance of
mortgage loans which have been included in Trusts formed by the Depositor, which
were originated or acquired by Bank of America during the periods indicated:
Aggregate Principal
Balance $299,960,769 $1,855,340,346 $4,446,655,671 $11,007,632,007
Bank of America serves as the Sponsor, and may serve as a Servicer, in the
Depositor's securitization program, in addition to owning all of the Depositor's
equity. Banc of America Securities LLC serves as an underwriter for the
Depositor's securitization program, is an affiliate of Bank of America, and
assists Bank of America and the Depositor in connection with the selection of
mortgage loans, including the Mortgage Loans, for various transactions. See
"Plan of Distribution."
THE DEPOSITOR
54
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 67/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
the Depositor will have any business operations other than offering mortgage
pass-through certificates and related activities.
The Depositor will have limited obligations and rights under each pooling
and servicing agreement after the closing date for any series, including, but
not limited to, repurchasing Mortgage Loans due to breaches of representations
and warranties.
The Depositor maintains its principal office at 214 North Tryon Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. Its telephone number is (704) 386-2400.
Neither the Depositor nor any of the Depositor's affiliates will ensure or
guarantee distributions on the Certificates of any series.
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Depositor will use substantially all of the net proceeds received from
the sale of each series of Certificates either:
The Depositor will use any remaining proceeds for its general corporate
purposes.
Each Mortgage Loan purchased by the Depositor must meet certain credit,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 68/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
55
Servicing Advances," if those amounts are not advanced by a Servicer. The Master
Servicer will also perform additional duties as described in the applicable
prospectus supplement. The Master Servicer will be entitled to receive a portion
of the interest payments on the Mortgage Loans included in the Trust Estate for
a series to cover its fees as Master Servicer or will be paid in another manner
specified in the applicable prospectus supplement. The Master Servicer may
subcontract with any other entity the obligations of the Master Servicer under
any pooling and servicing agreement. The Master Servicer will remain primarily
liable for the contractor's performance in accordance with the applicable
prospectus supplement. The Master Servicer may be released from its obligations
in certain circumstances. See "--The Servicers."
56
THE SERVICERS
57
liability to the Trust Estate or the Certificateholders, for the taking of any
action or for refraining from the taking of any action in good faith pursuant to
the pooling and servicing agreement, or for errors in judgment; provided,
however, that no Servicer nor any director, officer, employee or agent of any
Servicer will be protected against any liability that would otherwise be imposed
by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the
performance of its duties or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations
and duties under the pooling and servicing agreement. Each Servicer and any
director, officer, employee or agent of each Servicer shall be indemnified by
the Trust Estate and held harmless against any loss, liability or expense
incurred in connection with any legal action relating to the pooling and
servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement or the Certificates, other
than any loss, liability or expense related to any specific Mortgage Loan or
Mortgage Loans and any loss, liability or expense incurred by reason of willful
misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of it duties under
the pooling and servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement or by
reason of reckless disregard of obligations and duties under the pooling and
servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement. In addition, the pooling
and servicing agreement will provide that no Servicer will be under any
obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action that is not
incidental to its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement and that in
its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability. A Servicer may, however,
in its discretion, undertake any action deemed by it necessary or desirable
relating to the pooling and servicing agreement and the rights and duties of the
parties to the pooling and servicing agreement and the interests of the
Certificateholders. In this event, the legal expenses and costs of the action
and any liability resulting from it will be expenses, costs and liabilities of
the Trust and the Servicer will be entitled to be reimbursed out of the Servicer
Custodial Account, and any loss to the Trust arising from this right of
reimbursement will be allocated first to the Subordinate Certificate of a series
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 71/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
before being allocated to the related Senior Certificates, or if the series does
not contain Subordinate Certificates, pro rata among the various classes of
Certificates or in another manner specified in the applicable prospectus
supplement.
Any person into which the Servicer may be merged or consolidated, or any
person resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which the
Servicer is a party, or any person succeeding to the business through the
transfer of substantially all of its assets or all assets relating to the
business, or otherwise, of the Servicer will be the successor of the Servicer
under the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement for each series provided
that the successor or resulting entity is qualified to service mortgage loans
for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
The Servicer also has the right to assign its rights and delegate its
duties and obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement for each
series; provided that, if the Servicer desires to be released from its
obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, (i) the purchaser or
transferee accepting the assignment or delegation is qualified to service
mortgage loans for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, (ii) the purchaser is satisfactory
to the Trustee for the series, in the reasonable exercise of its judgment, and
executes and delivers to the Trustee an agreement, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee, which contains an assumption by the
purchaser or transferee of the due and punctual performance and observance of
each covenant and condition to be performed or observed by the Servicer under
the pooling and servicing agreement from and after the date of the agreement,
and (iii) each applicable Rating Agency's rating of any Certificates for the
series in effect immediately prior to the assignment, sale or transfer would not
be qualified, downgraded or withdrawn as a result of the assignment, sale or
transfer and the Certificates would not be placed on credit review status by any
Rating Agency. The Servicer will be released from its obligations under the
pooling and servicing agreement upon the assignment and delegation of its duties
and obligations, except that the Servicer will remain liable for all liabilities
and obligations incurred by it prior to the time that the conditions contained
in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) above are met.
In the event that there is a Master Servicer for a series, the provisions
described above will apply to the Master Servicer and substantially similar
provisions will apply to each Servicer under the Underlying Servicing
Agreements.
58
(the "CUT-OFF DATE"). The Trustee, concurrently with that assignment, will
authenticate and deliver the Certificates to the Depositor or its designated
agent in exchange for the Mortgage Loans and other assets, if any. Each Mortgage
Loan will be identified in a schedule appearing as an exhibit to the pooling and
servicing agreement. The schedule will include the principal balance of each
Mortgage Loan, the mortgage rate, the maturity of each mortgage note and other
information.
In lieu of the delivery requirement set forth above, with respect to any
mortgage which has been recorded in the name of Mortgage Electronic Registration
Systems, Inc. ("MERS") or its designee, no mortgage assignment in favor of the
Trustee will be required to be prepared or delivered. Instead, the Master
Servicer will be required to take all actions as are necessary to cause the
applicable Trust Estate to be shown as the owner of the related Mortgage Loan on
the records of MERS for purposes of the system of recording transfers of
beneficial ownership of mortgages maintained by MERS.
With respect to any Mortgage Loans that are cooperative loans, the
Depositor will generally be required to cause to be delivered to the Trustee;
59
The Trustee or a custodian will review the mortgage loan documents within
a specified number of days of receipt to ascertain that all required documents
have been properly executed and received. The Trustee will hold the mortgage
loan documents for each series in trust for the benefit of holders of the
Certificates. If any document is found by the Trustee or custodian not to have
been properly executed or received or to be unrelated to the Mortgage Loans
identified in the pooling and servicing agreement, and any defect cannot be
cured within the permitted time period, the Sponsor or other party specified in
the prospectus supplement will replace the Mortgage Loan with an eligible
substitute Mortgage Loan (as described in the related prospectus supplement) or
repurchase the related Mortgage Loan from the Trustee at a price generally equal
to the principal balance thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon. Upon
receipt of the repurchase price, in the case of a repurchase, the Trustee will
reimburse any unreimbursed Advances of principal and interest by the Master
Servicer with respect to that Mortgage Loan or unreimbursed payments under any
form of credit support. The remaining portion of the repurchase price will then
be passed through to holders of the Certificates as liquidation proceeds in
accordance with the procedures specified under "Description of Certificates--
Distributions". This substitution/repurchase obligation constitutes the sole
remedy available to Certificateholders or the Trustee for a defect in a mortgage
loan document.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 74/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o at the time of transfer the Sponsor had good title to the Mortgage
Loans and the mortgage notes were subject to no offsets, defenses or
counterclaims, except if the buydown agreement for a Buydown Loan
forgives certain indebtedness of a Mortgagor;
60
o any and all requirements of any federal, state or local law including,
without limitation, usury, truth in lending, real estate settlement
procedures, consumer credit protections, all applicable predatory and
abusive lending laws, equal credit opportunity or disclosure laws
applicable at the origination and servicing of the Mortgage Loans have
been complied with.
The pooling and servicing agreement may permit each Servicer to enter into
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 75/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
61
Each Servicer will be required to remit to the Trustee for deposit to the
Distribution Account for each series of Certificates on the date the
Certificates are issued any amounts representing scheduled payments of principal
and interest on the Mortgage Loans serviced by it due after the applicable
Cut-off Date but received on or prior thereto. Each Servicer will be required to
remit to the Master Servicer for deposit in an Eligible Custodial Account
maintained by the Master Servicer in the name of the Trustee (the "MASTER
SERVICER CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT") or, if there is no Master Servicer, to remit to the
Trustee for deposit in the Distribution Account, the following payments and
collections received or made by it relating to the Mortgage Loans serviced by it
subsequent to the applicable Cut-off Date (other than (a) payments due on or
before the Cut-off Date and (b) amounts held for future distribution):
62
63
Date). In the event that one or more elections has been made to treat the Trust
Estate (or one or more segregated pools of assets therein) with respect to a
series as one or more REMICs, no Eligible Investments will be sold or disposed
of at a gain prior to maturity unless the Trustee has received an opinion of
counsel or other evidence satisfactory to it that the sale or disposition will
not cause the Trust Estate (or segregated pool of assets) to be subject to the
tax on "prohibited transactions" imposed by Code Section 860F(a)(1), otherwise
subject the Trust Estate (or segregated pool of assets) to tax, or cause any
REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC while any Certificates of the series are
outstanding. All income and gain realized from any investment of funds in the
Distribution Account will generally be for the account of the Trustee as
additional compensation and all losses from investments of funds in the
Distribution Account will be deposited by the Trustee out of its own funds to
the Distribution Account immediately as realized.
The Trustee is permitted, from time to time, to make withdrawals from the
Distribution Account for the following purposes, to the extent permitted in the
applicable pooling and servicing agreement:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 78/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
(i) to pay itself the applicable trustee fee and to pay to the
owner thereof any Fixed Retained Yield;
The Trustee will cause any Paying Agent to execute and deliver to the
Trustee an instrument in which the Paying Agent agrees with the Trustee that the
Paying Agent will hold all amounts deposited with it by the Trustee for
distribution to Certificateholders in trust for the benefit of
Certificateholders until the amounts are distributed to Certificateholders or
otherwise disposed of as provided in the applicable pooling and servicing
agreement.
Advances by each Servicer will be made from its own funds or funds in the
applicable Servicer Custodial Account that do not constitute a portion of the
applicable available funds for that Distribution Date. The obligation to make an
Advance with respect to any Mortgage Loan will continue until the ultimate
disposition of the REO Property or Mortgaged Property relating to the Mortgage
Loan unless the Servicer determines, based on its estimation of the value of the
Mortgaged Property in relation to the sum of the unpaid principal balance of the
64
65
With respect to each Mortgage Loan having a fixed interest rate, the
applicable Underlying Servicing Agreement or pooling and servicing agreement
will generally provide that, when any Mortgaged Property is about to be conveyed
by the mortgagor, the Servicer will, to the extent it has knowledge of the
prospective conveyance, exercise its rights to accelerate the maturity of the
Mortgage Loan under the "due-on-sale" clause in the Mortgage Note, if any,
unless it is not exercisable under applicable law or if the exercise would
result in loss of insurance coverage relating to the Mortgage Loan or would, in
the Servicer's judgment, be reasonably likely to result in litigation by the
mortgagor and the Servicer, if applicable, has not obtained the Master
Servicer's consent to the exercise of the clause. In either case, the Servicer
is authorized to take or enter into an assumption and modification agreement
from or with the person to whom the Mortgaged Property has been or is about to
be conveyed, pursuant to which the person becomes liable under the Mortgage Note
and, unless prohibited by applicable state law, the mortgagor also remains
liable under the Mortgage Note, provided that the Mortgage Loan will continue to
be covered by any pool insurance policy and any related primary mortgage
insurance policy and the mortgage interest rate relating to the Mortgage Loan
and the payment terms shall remain unchanged. The Servicer will also be
authorized, with the prior approval of the pool insurer and the primary mortgage
insurer, if any, to enter into a substitution of liability agreement with the
person to whom the Mortgaged Property has been or is about to be conveyed, under
which the original mortgagor is released from liability and the person is
substituted as mortgagor and becomes liable under the Mortgage Note.
66
With respect to a Trust Estate (or any segregated pool of assets within a
Trust Estate) as to which one or more REMIC elections has been made, if the
Trustee acquires ownership of any Mortgaged Property as a result of a default or
reasonably foreseeable default of any Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged
Property, the Trustee or Master Servicer will be required to dispose of the
property prior to the close of the third calendar year following the year the
Trust Estate acquired the property (or any shorter period as is provided in the
applicable Underlying Servicing Agreement or pooling and servicing agreement)
unless the Trustee (a) receives an opinion of counsel to the effect that the
holding of the Mortgaged Property by the Trust Estate will not cause the Trust
Estate to be subject to the tax on "prohibited transactions" imposed by Code
Section 860F(a)(1) or cause any REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or (b)
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 82/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
applies for and is granted an extension of the applicable period in the manner
contemplated by Code Section 856(e)(3). The Servicer also will be required to
administer the Mortgaged Property in a manner which does not cause the Mortgaged
Property to fail to qualify as "foreclosure property" within the meaning of Code
Section 860G(a)(8) or result in the receipt by the Trust Estate of any "net
income from foreclosure property" within the meaning of Code Section 860G(c)(2),
respectively. In general, this would preclude the holding of the Mortgaged
Property by a party acting as a dealer in property or the receipt of rental
income based on the profits of the lessee of the property. See "Federal Income
Tax Consequences."
INSURANCE POLICIES
67
by state law and generally will be similar. Most of these policies typically
will not cover any physical damage resulting from the following: war,
revolution, governmental actions, floods and other water-related causes, earth
movement (including earthquakes, landslides and mudflows), nuclear reaction, wet
or dry rot, vermin, rodents, insects or domestic animals, hazardous wastes or
hazardous substances, theft and, in certain cases, vandalism. The foregoing list
is merely indicative of certain kinds of uninsured risks and is not
all-inclusive.
Each Servicer may maintain a blanket policy insuring against hazard losses
on all of the Mortgaged Properties in lieu of maintaining the required Standard
Hazard Insurance Policies and may maintain a blanket policy insuring against
special hazards in lieu of maintaining any required flood insurance. Each
Servicer will be liable for the amount of any deductible under a blanket policy
if that amount would have been covered by a required Standard Hazard Insurance
Policy or flood insurance, had it been maintained.
Each Servicer will exercise its reasonable efforts to keep each primary
mortgage insurance policy in full force and effect at least until the
outstanding principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan is equal to the
percentage of the appraised value of the mortgaged property specified in the
related prospectus supplement. Each Servicer will generally be required to pay
the premium for each primary mortgage insurance policy on a timely basis if the
mortgagor does not make the required payments.
Each Servicer, on behalf of the Trust Estate, will present claims to the
insurer under any applicable primary mortgage insurance policy and will take
necessary reasonable steps to permit recovery under those insurance policies
respecting defaulted Mortgage Loans. If any property securing a defaulted
Mortgage Loan is damaged and proceeds, if any, from the related hazard insurance
policy are insufficient to restore the damaged property to a condition
sufficient to permit recovery under any applicable primary mortgage insurance
policy, each Servicer will not be required to expend its own funds to restore
the damaged property unless the applicable Servicer determines:
68
proceeds.
"FIXED RETAINED YIELD" for any Mortgage Loan is that portion, if any, of
interest at the mortgage interest rate that is not included in the related Trust
Estate and is retained by the Depositor or the Sponsor. The prospectus
supplement for a series will describe the Fixed Retained Yield, if any, relating
to the Mortgage Loans of the series. Any Fixed Retained Yield will be
established on a loan-by-loan basis and will be specified in the schedule of
Mortgage Loans attached as an exhibit to the applicable pooling and servicing
agreement. If the Sponsor or the Depositor retains Fixed Retained Yield, the
Sponsor, if it is the Servicer, may deduct the Fixed Retained Yield from
mortgagor payments as received and retain or remit the Fixed Retained Yield to
the Depositor, as the case may be. Otherwise, the Servicer will deposit the
Fixed Retained Yield in the Master Servicer Custodial Account or Distribution
Account, and the Master Servicer or the Trustee will withdraw and remit the
Fixed Retained Yield to the owner thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with
respect to any payment of interest received relating to a Mortgage Loan (whether
paid by the mortgagor or received as Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds or
otherwise) which is less than the full amount of interest then due with respect
to the Mortgage Loan, the owner of the Fixed Retained Yield for the Mortgage
Loan will bear a ratable share of the interest shortfall.
Each Servicer will pay all expenses incurred in connection with the
servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it underlying a series, including,
without limitation, payment of the Standard Hazard Insurance Policy premiums.
The Servicer will be entitled, in certain circumstances, to reimbursement from
the Servicer Custodial Account of Periodic Advances, of Servicing Advances made
by it to pay taxes, insurance premiums and similar items with respect to any
Mortgaged Property or for expenditures incurred by it in connection with the
restoration, foreclosure or liquidation of any Mortgaged Property (to the extent
of Liquidation Proceeds or insurance policy proceeds in respect of the related
Mortgaged Property) and of certain losses against which it is indemnified by the
Trust Estate as described above under "Servicing of the Mortgage Loans--The
Servicers."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 85/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
69
EVIDENCE AS TO COMPLIANCE
Each Servicer and Master Servicer will deliver annually to the Trustee or
Master Servicer, as applicable, on or before the date specified in the
applicable pooling and servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement, an
officer's certificate stating that (i) a review of the Servicer's or Master
Servicer's activities during the preceding calendar year and of performance
under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing
Agreement has been made under the supervision of the officer, and (ii) to the
best of the officer's knowledge, based on the review, the Servicer or Master
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable pooling and
servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout the year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any of these
obligations in any material respect, specifying each failure known to the
officer and the nature and status of the failure.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 86/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
CERTAIN MATTERS REGARDING THE DEPOSITOR, THE SPONSOR AND THE MASTER SERVICER
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series of Certificates backed
in whole or in part by Mortgage Loans will generally provide that the Master
Servicer may not resign from its obligations and duties as Master Servicer,
except upon a determination that its duties are no longer permissible under
applicable law. No resignation under this clause is effective until the Trustee
or a successor has assumed the Master Servicer's obligations and duties under
the pooling and servicing agreement.
The pooling and servicing agreement will also provide that none of the
Depositor, the Master Servicer or the Sponsor, or any directors, officers,
employees or agents of any of them will be under any liability to the Trust
Estate or certificateholders or the Trustee, any subservicer or others for any
action taken or not taken by any of those parties, any subservicer or the
Trustee in good faith pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, or for
errors in judgment. However, none of the Depositor, the Sponsor, the Master
Servicer or any of the parties described above will be protected against any
liability that otherwise would be imposed on one of those parties by reason of
willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of duties
or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties. The pooling
and servicing agreement will provide that each of the parties described above is
entitled to indemnification by the Trust Estate and will be held harmless
against any loss, liability or expense incurred in connection with any legal
action relating to the pooling and servicing agreement or the Certificates for a
series, other than any loss, liability or expense related to any specific
Mortgage Loan (except any loss, liability or
70
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
o any failure by the Master Servicer or, if a Servicer has executed the
pooling and servicing agreement, that Servicer, to deposit amounts in
the Distribution Account, Master Servicer Custodial Account or
Servicer Custodial Account, as applicable, in the amount and manner
provided in the pooling and servicing agreement so as to enable the
Trustee to distribute to Certificateholders any required payment
(other than Periodic Advances) which continues unremedied for a
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 87/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
o any failure by the Master Servicer or a Servicer that has executed the
pooling and servicing agreement duly to observe or perform in any
material respects any other of its covenants or agreements in the
Certificates or the pooling and servicing agreement which continues
unremedied for a specified number of days after the giving of written
notice of the failure to the Master Servicer or Servicer by the
Trustee or the Depositor, or, if specified in the pooling and
servicing agreement, to the Master Servicer or the Servicer and the
Trustee by holders of Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of the
aggregate voting rights of all the Certificates affected thereby;
71
ENFORCEMENT
No certificateholder of any series will have any right under a pooling and
servicing agreement to institute any proceeding with respect to the pooling and
servicing agreement unless the certificateholder previously has given to the
Trustee written notice of default and the continuance thereof and unless holders
of Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of each class of certificates
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 88/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
AMENDMENT
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series may be amended by the
Depositor, the Sponsor (if a party thereto), the Master Servicer, the Servicer
and the Trustee, without notice to or the consent of any certificateholder to,
among other things:
provided that the amendment will not adversely affect in any material respect
the interests of any certificateholder of that series.
o reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, payments
received on Mortgage Loans or distributions that are required to be
made in respect of any Certificate without the consent of the holder
of the Certificate; or
72
LIST OF CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 89/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
The obligations of the Depositor, the Sponsor (if a party thereto), the
Master Servicer, the Servicer and the Trustee created by the pooling and
servicing agreement will terminate upon the earlier of:
In no event, however, will the Trust Estate created by any pooling and servicing
agreement continue beyond the expiration of 21 years from the death of the
survivor of the persons named in the pooling and servicing agreement. For each
series of Certificates, the Trustee will give written notice of termination of
the pooling and servicing agreement to each Certificateholder, and the final
distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the
Certificates at an office or agency appointed by the Depositor and specified in
the notice of termination. The termination of the Trust is required to be
effected in a manner consistent with applicable federal income tax regulations
and the REMIC status of any REMIC.
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series may permit the Master
Servicer or any other entity specified in the related prospectus supplement to
repurchase, or permit or require the Trustee to auction, all or a portion of the
remaining Mortgage Loans or Mortgage Certificates and property acquired in
respect of a Mortgage Loan, at a purchase price generally equal to the unpaid
principal balance of the Mortgage Loans in the applicable group or groups plus
the fair market value of any related mortgaged properties acquired upon
foreclosure of the related Mortgage Loans, together with accrued and unpaid
interest at the applicable mortgage interest rate on the related Mortgage Loans.
However, if the pooling and servicing agreement for a series permits the
Depositor to exercise the purchase option, for so long as the Depositor is
subject to regulation by the OCC, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve or the OTS, the
Depositor may exercise its purchase option only if the aggregate fair market
value of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties is greater than or equal to the
purchase price described in the preceding sentence. The exercise of this right
will effect early retirement of the Certificates of that series, but the Master
Servicer's or other party's right so to repurchase is subject to the aggregate
principal balances of the Mortgage Loans at the time of repurchase being less
than the percentage of the aggregate initial principal amount of all
Certificates of that series at the Cut-off Date specified in the related
prospectus supplement.
based in part on the fair market value of the REO Property and this fair market
value is less than the unpaid principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan.
73
this type of purchase to take place, the Trustee must receive an opinion of
counsel that the repurchase and related distributions to certificateholders:
For each series, the Trustee will give written notice of termination of
the pooling and servicing agreement to each certificateholder, and the final
distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the
Certificates at an office or agency of the Trustee specified in the notice of
termination.
THE TRUSTEE
The Trustee for each series of Certificates will be named in the related
prospectus supplement. The Trustee may have normal banking relationships with
the Depositor, any Originator, any Master Servicer, any Servicer and/or any
subservicer. With respect to certain series of Certificates, a securities
administrator or other entity specified in the related prospectus supplement may
perform certain duties and functions normally performed by the Trustee. Any
securities administrator or other such entity will be a party to the pooling and
servicing agreement and will be named in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Any securities administrator or other such entity will have obligations and
rights similar to the Trustee as described herein.
The Trustee generally will be responsible under each pooling and servicing
agreement for providing general administrative services for the Trust Estate for
any series, including, among other things, (i) establishing and maintaining the
Distribution Account; (ii) calculation of the amounts payable to
certificateholders on each Distribution Date; (iii) making distributions to
certificateholders; (iv) preparation of federal and applicable state and local
tax and information returns; (v) preparation of reports, if any, required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; (vi) maintaining any mortgage
pool insurance policy, mortgagor bankruptcy bond, special hazard insurance
policy or other form of credit enhancement that may be required with respect to
any series; and (vii) making Periodic Advances on the Mortgage Loans to the
limited extent described under "The Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Periodic
Advances and Servicing Advances," if those amounts are not advanced by a
Servicer or the Master Servicer.
The Trustee and any director, officer, employee or agent of the Trustee
shall be entitled to indemnification by the Trust Estate and held harmless
against any loss, liability or expense (including reasonable attorney's fees)
(a) incurred in connection with any claim or legal action relating to (i) the
pooling and servicing agreement, (ii) the Certificates, or (iii) the performance
of any of the Trustee's duties under the pooling and servicing agreement, unless
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 91/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
The Trustee may resign at any time, in which event the Master Servicer or,
if there is no Master Servicer, the Servicer(s) will be obligated to appoint a
successor trustee. The Master Servicer or, if there is no Master Servicer, the
Servicer(s) may also remove the Trustee if the Trustee ceases to be eligible to
act as Trustee under the
74
summaries are not exhaustive, do not reflect the laws of any particular state
and do not encompass the laws of all states in which the security for the
Mortgage Loans is situated. The summaries are qualified in their entirety by
reference to the applicable federal and state laws governing the Mortgage Loans.
GENERAL
CONDOMINIUMS
75
The owner also owns a proportionate undivided interest in all parts of the
condominium building (other than the other individual condominium units) and all
areas or facilities, if any, for the common use of the condominium units. The
condominium unit owners appoint or elect the condominium association to govern
the affairs of the condominium.
COOPERATIVES
FORECLOSURE
76
and expenses incurred in enforcing the obligation. Generally, state law controls
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 94/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
COOPERATIVES
77
Article 9 of the UCC provides that the proceeds of the sale will be
applied first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale and then to satisfy the
indebtedness secured by the lender's security interest. The recognition
agreement, however, generally provides that the lender's right to the
reimbursement is subject to the right of the cooperative corporation to receive
sums due under the proprietary lease or occupancy agreement. If there are
proceeds remaining, the lender must account to the tenant-stockholder for the
surplus. Conversely, if a portion of the indebtedness remains unpaid, the
tenant-stockholder is generally responsible for the deficiency. See
"--Anti-Deficiency Legislation, the Bankruptcy Code and Other Limitations on
Lenders" below.
LEASEHOLDS
RIGHTS OF REDEMPTION
78
The Master Servicer generally will not be required under the pooling and
servicing agreement to pursue deficiency judgments on the Mortgage Loans even if
permitted by law.
federal and state statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Code, and state
laws affording relief to debtors may interfere with or affect the ability of a
secured mortgage lender to obtain payment of a mortgage loan, to realize upon
collateral and/or enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the
Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and
deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of a
bankruptcy petition and, usually, no interest or principal payments are made
during the course of the bankruptcy case. Foreclosure of an interest in real
property of a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code can typically occur
only if the bankruptcy court vacates the stay, which is an action the court may
be reluctant to take, particularly if the debtor has the prospect of
restructuring his or her debts and the mortgage collateral is not deteriorating
in value. The delay and the consequences thereof caused by the automatic stay
can be significant. Also, under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a petition in
bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior lienor may stay a senior lender from
taking action to foreclose.
A homeowner may file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code under any of
three different chapters of the Bankruptcy Code.
o Under Chapter 7, the assets of the debtor are liquidated and a lender
secured by a lien may "bid in" (i.e., bid up to the amount of the
debt) at the sale of the asset. See "--Foreclosure."
o Under Chapter 11, a homeowner can reorganize his or her debts through
his or her reorganization plan.
79
with the term commencing when the repayment plan becomes effective, while
defaults may be cured over a longer period of time under a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.
The Code provides priority to certain tax liens over the lien of the
mortgage. In addition, substantive requirements are imposed upon mortgage
lenders in connection with the origination and the servicing of mortgage loans
by numerous federal and some state consumer protection laws. These laws include
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Equal
Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, and
related statutes. These federal laws impose specific statutory liabilities upon
lenders who originate mortgage loans and who fail to comply with the provisions
of the applicable laws. In some cases, this liability may affect assignees of
the Mortgage Loans.
80
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 99/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Title insurance generally available on those Mortgage Loans may exclude coverage
for some of the risks described in this paragraph.
"DUE-ON-SALE" CLAUSES
The forms of note, mortgage and deed of trust relating to Mortgage Loans
may contain a "due-on-sale" clause permitting acceleration of the maturity of a
loan if the borrower transfers its interest in the property. Court decisions and
legislative actions placed substantial restrictions on the right of lenders to
enforce these clauses in many states. However, effective October 15, 1982,
Congress enacted the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 (the
"GARN ACT") which purports to preempt state laws which prohibit the enforcement
of "due-on-sale" clauses by providing, among other matters, that "due-on-sale"
clauses in certain loans (which loans may include the Mortgage Loans) made after
the effective date of the Garn Act are enforceable, within certain limitations
as set forth in the Garn Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Due-on-sale" clauses contained in mortgage loans originated by federal savings
and loan associations or federal savings banks are fully enforceable pursuant to
regulations of the OTS, as successor to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, which
preempt state law restrictions on the enforcement of these clauses. Similarly,
"due-on-sale" clauses in mortgage loans made by national banks and federal
credit unions are now fully enforceable pursuant to preemptive regulations of
the Comptroller of the Currency and the National Credit Union Administration,
respectively.
The Garn Act created a limited exemption from its general rule of
enforceability for "due-on-sale" clauses in certain mortgage loans ("WINDOW
PERIOD LOANS") which were originated by non-federal lenders and made or assumed
in certain states ("WINDOW PERIOD STATES") during the period, prior to October
15, 1982, in which that state prohibited the enforcement of "due-on-sale"
clauses by constitutional provision, statute or statewide court decision (the
"WINDOW PERIOD"). Though neither the Garn Act nor the OTS regulations actually
names the Window Period States, Freddie Mac has taken the position, in
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 100/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
81
mortgage loans which it has purchased, that the Window Period States were:
Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New
Mexico, Utah and Washington. Under the Garn Act, unless a Window Period State
took action by October 15, 1985, the end of the Window Period, to further
regulate enforcement of "due-on sale" clauses in Window Period Loans,
"due-on-sale" clauses would become enforceable even in Window Period Loans. Five
of the Window Period States (Arizona, Minnesota, Michigan, New Mexico and Utah)
have taken actions which restrict the enforceability of "due-on-sale" clauses in
Window Period Loans beyond October 15, 1985. The actions taken vary among these
states.
of certain offenses, can be seized and ordered forfeited to the United States of
America. The offenses which can trigger a seizure and forfeiture include, among
others, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,
the Bank Secrecy Act, the anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including
the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and the regulations issued thereunder, as well as
the narcotic drug laws. In many instances, the United States may seize the
property even before a conviction occurs.
82
Generally, under the terms of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the
"RELIEF ACT"), a borrower who enters military service after the origination of
their Mortgage Loan (including a borrower who is a member of the National Guard
or is in reserve status at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan and
is later called to active duty) may not be charged interest, including fees and
charges, in excess of 6% per annum during the period of the borrower's active
duty status. In addition to adjusting the interest, the lender must forgive this
interest in excess of 6% per annum, unless a court or administrative agency
orders otherwise upon the application of the lender. It is possible that the
Relief Act could have an effect, for an indeterminate period of time, on the
ability of the Servicer to collect full amounts of interest on certain of the
Mortgage Loans in a Trust Estate. Any shortfall in interest collections
resulting from the application of the Relief Act or any amendment thereto could
result in losses to the holders of the Certificates of the related series.
Further, the Relief Act imposes limitations which would impair the ability of
the Servicer to foreclose on an affected Mortgage Loan during the borrower's
period of active duty status. Thus, in the event that an affected Mortgage Loan
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 102/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
goes into default, there may be delays and losses occasioned by the inability to
realize upon the Mortgaged Property in a timely fashion. In addition, the Relief
Act provides broad discretion for a court to modify a mortgage loan upon
application of the mortgagor. Certain states have enacted comparable legislation
which may lead to the modification of a mortgage loan or interfere with or
affect the ability of the Servicer to timely collect payments of principal and
interest on, or to foreclose on, Mortgage Loans of borrowers in these states who
are active or reserve members of the armed services or national guard. For
example, California has extended legislation providing protection equivalent to
that provided by the Relief Act to California national guard members called up
for active service by the Governor or President and reservists called to active
duty.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
83
A decision in May 1990 of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Fleet Factors Corp. very narrowly construed
the CERCLA Secured-Creditor Exemption. The court's opinion suggested that a
lender need not have involved itself in the day-to-day operations of the
facility or participated in
84
lender.
85
GENERAL
86
GENERAL
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 107/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
87
88
o the corpus of the Trust Estate must consist solely of assets of the
type that have been included in other investment pools in the
marketplace;
(b) The certificates acquired by ERISA Plans must have received a rating
from S&P, Moody's or Fitch at the time of the acquisition that is in
one of the two highest generic rating categories; and
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 109/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
(c) The loan-to-value ratio (where the loan amount equals the sum of (i)
the outstanding principal balance due under any obligation which is
held by the issuing entity and (ii) the outstanding principal
balance(s) of any other obligation(s) of higher priority (whether or
not held by the issuing entity) which are secured by the same
collateral) of the loans does not exceed 125%.
89
OTHER EXEMPTIONS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 110/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
However, it appears that PTCE 83-1 does not or might not apply to the
purchase and holding of:
o Residual Certificates;
o Subordinate Certificates;
PTCE 83-1 sets forth "general conditions" and "specific conditions" to its
applicability. Section II of PTCE 83-1 sets forth the following general
conditions to the application of the exemption:
90
promulgating PTCE 83-1 (and a predecessor exemption), the DOL did not have under
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 111/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Although Non-ERISA Plans and Exempt Plans are not considered ERISA Plans
for purposes of the preceding discussion, Non-ERISA Plans are subject to the
prohibited transaction provisions of Code Section 4975, and both Non-ERISA Plans
and Exempt Plans may be subject to certain other ERISA-like requirements of
applicable law. As a result, before purchasing any Certificates by or on behalf
of a Non-ERISA Plan or any Exempt Plan, the prospective purchaser should
exercise special caution and should consult with its legal counsel concerning
the propriety and implications of its investment under the Code or other
applicable law.
DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE RULES AND THE PENALTIES IMPOSED UPON
PERSONS INVOLVED IN PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS, IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT
POTENTIAL INVESTORS WHO ARE ACTING ON BEHALF OF A BENEFIT PLAN OR ANY OTHER
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN OR ARRANGEMENT CONSULT WITH THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING
THE CONSEQUENCES UNDER ERISA, THE CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE LAW OF THEIR
ACQUISITION AND OWNERSHIP OF CERTIFICATES.
consult with their own legal advisors in determining whether and to what extent
the Non-SMMEA Certificates constitute legal investments for them.
91
under the laws of the United States or of any state (including the District of
Columbia and Puerto Rico) whose authorized investments are subject to state
regulation, to the same extent that, under applicable law, obligations issued by
or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States or any of its
agencies or instrumentalities constitute legal investments for those entities.
92
The authorities on which this discussion and the opinion referred to below
are based are subject to change or differing interpretations which could apply
retroactively. Prospective investors should note that no rulings have been or
will be sought from the IRS with respect to any of the federal income tax
consequences discussed below, and no assurance can be given that the IRS will
not take contrary positions. Taxpayers and preparers of tax returns, including
those filed by any REMIC or other issuer, should be aware that under applicable
Treasury regulations a provider of advice on specific issues of law is not
considered an income tax return preparer unless the advice (1) is given with
respect to events that have occurred at the time the advice is rendered and is
not given with respect to the consequences of contemplated actions, and (2) is
directly relevant to the determination of an entry on a tax return. If penalties
were asserted against purchasers of the Securities offered hereunder in respect
of their treatment of the Securities for tax purposes, the summary of tax
considerations contained, or the opinions stated, herein and in the prospectus
supplement may not meet the conditions necessary for purchasers' reliance on
that summary, or those opinions, to exculpate them from the asserted penalties.
Accordingly, taxpayers should consult their own tax advisors and tax return
preparers regarding the preparation of any item on a tax return, even where the
anticipated tax treatment has been discussed in this prospectus. In addition to
the federal income tax consequences described in this prospectus, potential
investors should consider the state and local tax consequences, if any, of the
purchase, ownership and disposition of the securities. See "State Tax
Considerations."
93
GENERAL
Trust Estate as to which one or more REMIC elections will be made will be
referred to as a "REMIC POOL" For purposes of this discussion, Certificates of a
series as to which one or more REMIC elections are made are referred to as
"REMIC CERTIFICATES" and will consist of one or more classes of "REGULAR
CERTIFICATES" and one class of "RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES" in the case of each REMIC
Pool. Qualification as a REMIC requires ongoing compliance with certain
conditions. For each series of REMIC Certificates, Orrick, Herrington &
Sutcliffe LLP, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP or Hunton & Williams LLP, each
as counsel to the Depositor, has advised the Depositor that in the firm's
opinion, assuming (i) the making of an appropriate election, (ii) compliance
with the pooling and servicing agreement, and (iii) compliance with any changes
in the law, including any amendments to the Code or applicable Treasury
regulations, each REMIC Pool will qualify as a REMIC. In that case, the Regular
Certificates will be considered to be "regular interests" in the REMIC Pool and
generally will be treated for federal income tax purposes as if they were newly
originated debt instruments, and the Residual Certificates will be considered to
be "residual interests" in the REMIC Pool. The prospectus supplement for each
series of Certificates will indicate whether one or more REMIC elections with
respect to the related Trust Estate will be made, in which event references to
"REMIC" or "REMIC POOL" in this prospectus shall be deemed to refer to each
REMIC Pool.
Where two REMIC Pools are a part of a tiered structure they will be
treated as one REMIC for purposes of the tests described above respecting asset
ownership of more or less than 95%. In addition, if the assets of the REMIC
include Buy-Down Loans, it is possible that the percentage of the assets
constituting "loans . . . secured by an interest in real property which is . . .
residential real property" for purposes of Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v), may
be required to be reduced by the amount of the related Buydown Funds. REMIC
Certificates held by a regulated investment company will not constitute
"Government securities" within the meaning of Code Section 851(b)(3)(A)(i).
QUALIFICATION AS A REMIC
For the REMIC Pool to qualify as a REMIC, there must be ongoing compliance
on the part of the REMIC Pool with the requirements set forth in the Code. The
REMIC Pool must fulfill an asset test, which requires that no more than a de
minimis portion of the assets of the REMIC Pool, as of the close of the third
calendar month
94
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 116/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
beginning after the "STARTUP DAY" (which for purposes of this discussion is the
date of issuance of the REMIC Certificates) and at all times thereafter, may
consist of assets other than "qualified mortgages" and "permitted investments."
The REMIC Regulations provide a safe harbor under which the de minimis
requirement will be met if at all times the aggregate adjusted basis of the
nonqualified assets is less than 1% of the aggregate adjusted basis of all the
REMIC Pool's assets. An entity that fails to meet the safe harbor may
nevertheless demonstrate that it holds no more than a de minimis amount of
nonqualified assets. A REMIC Pool also must provide "reasonable arrangements" to
prevent its residual interests from being held by "disqualified organizations"
or agents thereof and must furnish applicable tax information to transferors or
agents that violate this requirement. See "--Taxation of Residual
Certificates--Tax-Related Restrictions on Transfer of Residual
Certificates--Disqualified Organizations" below.
third calendar year following the year in which the property is acquired with an
extension that may be granted by the Internal Revenue Service.
95
rates on some or all of the qualified mortgages. The specified principal amount
of a regular interest that provides for interest payments consisting of a
specified, nonvarying portion of interest payments on qualified mortgages may be
zero. A residual interest is an interest in a REMIC Pool other than a regular
interest that is issued on the Startup Day and that is designated as a residual
interest. An interest in a REMIC Pool may be treated as a regular interest even
if payments of principal on the interest are subordinated to payments on other
regular interests or the residual interest in the REMIC Pool, and are dependent
on the absence of defaults or delinquencies on qualified mortgages or permitted
investments, lower than reasonably expected returns on permitted investments,
unanticipated expenses incurred by the REMIC Pool or prepayment interest
shortfalls. Accordingly, the Regular Certificates of a series will constitute
one or more classes of regular interests, and the Residual Certificates with
respect to that series will constitute a single class of residual interests on
which distributions are made pro rata.
If an entity, such as the REMIC Pool, fails to comply with one or more of
the ongoing requirements of the Code for REMIC status during any taxable year,
the Code provides that the entity will not be treated as a REMIC for that year
and any following year. In this event, an entity with multiple classes of
ownership interests may be treated as a separate association taxable as a
corporation under Treasury regulations, and the Regular Certificates may be
treated as equity interests in that corporation. The Code, however, authorizes
the Treasury Department to issue regulations that address situations where
failure to meet one or more of the requirements for REMIC status occurs
inadvertently and in good faith, and disqualification of the REMIC Pool would
occur absent regulatory relief. Investors should be aware, however, that the
Conference Committee Report to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "1986 ACT")
indicates that the relief may be accompanied by sanctions, such as the
imposition of a corporate tax on all or a portion of the REMIC Pool's income for
the period of time in which the requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied.
GENERAL
Regular Certificateholders must use the accrual method of accounting with regard
to Regular Certificates, regardless of the method of accounting they otherwise
use.
96
97
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 120/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
made on the Regular Certificate as of the end of that accrual period, and (b)
the distributions made on the Regular Certificate during the accrual period that
are included in the Regular Certificate's stated redemption price at maturity,
over (ii) the adjusted issue price of the Regular Certificate at the beginning
of the accrual period. The present value of the remaining distributions referred
to in the preceding sentence is calculated based on (i) the yield to maturity of
the Regular Certificate at the issue date, (ii) events (including actual
prepayments) that have occurred prior to the end of the accrual period, and
(iii) the Prepayment Assumption. For these purposes, the adjusted issue price of
a Regular Certificate at the beginning of any accrual period equals the issue
price of the Regular Certificate, increased by the aggregate amount of Original
Issue Discount for the Regular Certificate that accrued in all prior accrual
periods and reduced by the amount of distributions included in the Regular
Certificate's stated redemption price at maturity that were made on the Regular
Certificate in those prior periods. The Original Issue Discount accruing during
any accrual period (as determined in this paragraph) will then be divided by the
number of days in the period to determine the daily portion of Original Issue
Discount for each day in the period. If an initial accrual period is shorter
than a full accrual period, the daily portions of Original Issue Discount must
be determined according to an appropriate allocation under any reasonable
method.
Under the method described above, the daily portions of Original Issue
Discount required to be included in income by a Regular Certificateholder
generally will increase to take into account prepayments on the Regular
Certificates as a result of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans that exceed the
Prepayment Assumption, and generally will decrease (but not below zero for any
period) if the prepayments are slower than the Prepayment Assumption. An
increase in prepayments on the Mortgage Loans for a series of Regular
Certificates can result in both a change in the priority of principal payments
for certain classes of Regular Certificates and either an increase or decrease
in the daily portions of Original Issue Discount for the Regular Certificates.
series, but would not be required to accrue interest after the last record date
for such series. The proposed regulations are limited to Regular Certificates
with delayed payment for periods of fewer than 32 days. The proposed regulations
are proposed to apply to any Regular Certificate issued after the date the final
regulations are published in the Federal Register.
ACQUISITION PREMIUM
98
Under the REMIC Regulations, a Regular Certificate (i) bearing a rate that
qualifies as a variable rate under the OID Regulations that is tied to current
values of a variable rate (or the highest, lowest or average of two or more
variable rates, including a rate based on the average cost of funds of one or
more financial institutions), or a positive or negative multiple of such a rate
(plus or minus a specified number of basis points), or that represents a
weighted average of rates on some or all of the Mortgage Loans, including such a
rate that is subject to one or more caps or floors, or (ii) bearing one or more
of these variable rates for one or more periods, or one or more fixed rates for
one or more periods, and a different variable rate or fixed rate for other
periods, qualifies as a regular interest in a REMIC. Accordingly, it is
anticipated that the Trustee will treat Regular Certificates that qualify as
regular interests under this rule in the same manner as obligations bearing a
variable rate for Original Issue Discount reporting purposes.
99
MARKET DISCOUNT
PREMIUM
100
TREATMENT OF LOSSES
resulting from any liquidated Mortgage Loans. The Internal Revenue Service,
however, could take the position that non-corporate holders will be allowed a
bad debt deduction to reflect those losses only after all the Mortgage Loans
remaining in the Trust Estate have been liquidated or the applicable class of
Regular Certificates has been otherwise retired. The Internal Revenue Service
could also assert that losses on the Regular Certificates are deductible based
on some other method that may defer these deductions for all holders, such as
reducing future cash flow for purposes of computing Original Issue Discount this
may have the effect of creating "negative" Original Issue Discount which would
be deductible only against future positive Original Issue Discount
101
Generally, the "daily portions" of REMIC taxable income or net loss will
be includible as ordinary income or loss in determining the federal taxable
income of holders of Residual Certificates ("RESIDUAL HOLDERS"), and will not be
taxed separately to the REMIC Pool. The daily portions of REMIC taxable income
or net loss of a Residual Holder are determined by allocating the REMIC Pool's
taxable income or net loss for each calendar quarter ratably to each day in the
quarter and by allocating the daily portion among the Residual Holders in
proportion to their respective holdings of Residual Certificates in the REMIC
Pool on that day. REMIC taxable income is generally determined in the same
manner as the taxable income of an individual using the accrual method of
accounting, except, in addition to certain other adjustments, that (i) the
limitations on deductibility of investment interest expense and expenses for the
production of income do not apply, (ii) all bad loans will be deductible as
business bad debts and (iii) the limitation on the deductibility of interest and
expenses related to tax-exempt income will apply.
The REMIC Pool's gross income includes interest, Original Issue Discount
income and market discount income, if any, on the Mortgage Loans, reduced by
amortization of any premium on the Mortgage Loans, plus
102
The amount of any net loss of the REMIC Pool that may be taken into
account by the Residual Holder is limited to the adjusted basis of the Residual
Certificate as of the close of the quarter (or time of disposition of the
Residual Certificate if earlier), determined without taking into account the net
loss for the quarter. The initial basis of a purchaser of a Residual Certificate
is the amount paid for the Residual Certificate. This basis will be increased by
the amount of taxable income of the REMIC Pool reportable by the Residual Holder
and will be decreased (but not below zero), first, by a cash distribution from
the REMIC Pool and, second, by the amount of loss of the REMIC Pool reportable
by the Residual Holder. Any loss that is disallowed on account of this
limitation may be carried over indefinitely for a Residual Holder as to whom a
loss was disallowed and may be used by that Residual Holder only to offset any
income generated by the same REMIC Pool.
103
A Residual Certificate may have a negative value if the net present value
of anticipated tax liabilities exceeds the present value of anticipated cash
flows. The REMIC Regulations appear to treat the issue price for this type of
residual interest as zero rather than the negative amount for purposes of
determining the REMIC Pool's basis in its assets. Regulations have been issued
regarding the federal income tax treatment of "inducement fees" received by
transferees of noneconomic REMIC residual interests. These regulations require
inducement fees to be included in income over a period reasonably related to the
period in which a Residual Certificate is expected to generate taxable income or
net loss to its holder. Under two safe harbor methods, inducement fees are
permitted to be included in income: (i) in the same amounts and over the same
period that the Residual Holder uses for financial reporting purposes, provided
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 128/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
that this period is not shorter than the period the related REMIC is expected to
generate taxable income or (ii) ratably over the remaining anticipated weighted
average life of all the regular and residual interests issued by the related
REMIC, determined based on actual distributions projected as remaining to be
made on those interests under the applicable prepayment assumption. If the
Residual Holder sells or otherwise disposes of the residual interest, any
unrecognized portion of the inducement fee generally is required to be taken
into account at the time of the sale or disposition. A prospective purchaser of
a Residual Certificate should consult with its tax counsel regarding the effect
of these regulations.
Market Discount. The REMIC Pool will have market discount income on the
Mortgage Loans if, in general, the basis of the REMIC Pool in those Mortgage
Loans is exceeded by their unpaid principal balances. The REMIC Pool's basis in
Mortgage Loans is generally the fair market value of the Mortgage Loans
immediately after their transfer to the REMIC Pool. The REMIC Regulations
provide that this basis is equal in the aggregate to the issue prices of all
regular and residual interests in the REMIC Pool. The accrued portion of the
market discount would be recognized currently as an item of ordinary income in a
manner similar to Original Issue Discount. Market discount income generally
should accrue in the manner described above under "--Taxation of Regular
Certificates--Market Discount."
Premium. Generally, if the basis of the REMIC Pool in the Mortgage Loans
exceeds their unpaid principal balances, the REMIC Pool will be considered to
have acquired the Mortgage Loans at a premium equal to the amount of the excess.
As stated above, the REMIC Pool's basis in Mortgage Loans is the fair market
value of the Mortgage Loans, based on the aggregate of the issue prices of the
regular and residual interests in the REMIC Pool immediately after the transfer
thereof to the REMIC Pool. In a manner analogous to the discussion above under
"--Taxation of Regular Certificates--Premium," a person that holds a Mortgage
Loan as a capital asset under Code Section 1221 may elect under Code Section 171
to amortize premium on Mortgage Loans originated after
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 129/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
104
September 27, 1985 under the constant yield method. Amortizable bond premium
will be treated as an offset to interest income on the Mortgage Loans, rather
than as a separate deduction item. Because substantially all of the mortgagors
on the Mortgage Loans are expected to be individuals, Code Section 171 will not
be available for premium on Mortgage Loans originated on or prior to September
27, 1985. Premium on those Mortgage Loans may be deductible in accordance with a
reasonable method regularly employed by their holder. The allocation of this
premium pro rata among principal payments should be considered a reasonable
method; however, the Internal Revenue Service may argue that this premium should
be allocated in a different manner, such as allocating this premium entirely to
the final payment of principal.
There are three rules for determining the effect of excess inclusions on
the alternative minimum taxable income of a Residual Holder. First, alternative
minimum taxable income for a Residual Holder is determined without regard to the
special rule, discussed above, that taxable income cannot be less than excess
inclusions. Second, a Residual Holder's alternative minimum taxable income for a
taxable year cannot be less than the excess inclusions for the year. Third, the
amount of any alternative minimum tax net operating loss deduction must be
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 130/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
105
the transferor of the Residual Certificate, except that where the transfer is
through an agent (including a broker, nominee or other middleman) for a
Disqualified Organization, the tax would instead be imposed on the agent.
However, a transferor of a Residual Certificate would in no event be liable for
the tax for a transfer if the transferee furnishes to the transferor an
affidavit stating that the transferee is not a Disqualified Organization and, as
of the time of the transfer, the transferor does not have actual knowledge that
the affidavit is false. The tax also may be waived by the Internal Revenue
Service if the Disqualified Organization promptly disposes of the Residual
Certificate and the transferor pays income tax at the highest corporate rate on
the excess inclusion for the period the Residual Certificate is actually held by
the Disqualified Organization.
The pooling and servicing agreement for a series will provide that no
legal or beneficial interest in a Residual Certificate may be transferred or
registered unless (i) the proposed transferee furnishes to the Trustee an
affidavit providing its taxpayer identification number and stating that the
transferee is the beneficial owner of the Residual Certificate and is not a
Disqualified Organization and is not purchasing the Residual Certificate on
behalf of a Disqualified Organization (i.e., as a broker, nominee or middleman
thereof) and (ii) the transferor provides a statement in writing to the Trustee
that it has no actual knowledge that the affidavit is false. Moreover, the
pooling and servicing agreement will provide that any attempted or purported
transfer in violation of these transfer restrictions will be null and void and
will vest no rights in any purported transferee. Each Residual Certificate with
respect to a series will bear a legend referring to these restrictions on
transfer, and each Residual Holder will be deemed to have agreed, as a condition
of ownership thereof, to any amendments to the related pooling and servicing
agreement required under the Code or applicable Treasury regulations to
effectuate the foregoing restrictions. Information necessary to compute an
applicable excise tax must be furnished to the Internal Revenue Service and to
the requesting party within 60 days of the request, and the Sponsor or the
Trustee may charge a fee for computing and providing this information.
106
pay taxes due on its share of the taxable income of the REMIC. A safe harbor is
provided if (i) the transferor conducted, at the time of the transfer, a
reasonable investigation of the financial condition of the transferee and found
that the transferee historically had paid its debts as they came due and found
no significant evidence to indicate that the transferee would not continue to
pay its debts as they came due in the future, (ii) the transferee represents to
the transferor that it understands that, as the holder of the non-economic
residual interest, the transferee may incur tax liabilities in excess of any
cash flows generated by the interest and that the transferee intends to pay
taxes associated with holding the residual interest as they become due, (iii)
the transferee represents to the transferor that it will not cause income from
the residual certificate to be attributable to a foreign permanent establishment
or fixed base (within the meaning of an applicable income tax treaty) of the
transferee or of any other person, and (iv) one of the two following tests is
satisfied: either
(a) the present value of the anticipated tax liabilities associated with
holding the noneconomic residual interest will not exceed the sum of:
(3) the present value of the anticipated tax savings associated with
holding the residual interest as the REMIC generates losses; or
(b) (1) the transferee must be a domestic "C" corporation (other than a
corporation exempt from taxation or a regulated investment company
or real estate investment trust) (generally, $100 million of gross
assets and $10 million of net assets for the current year and the
two preceding fiscal years);
(2) the transferee must agree in writing that any subsequent transfer
of the residual interest would be to an eligible "C" corporation
and would meet the requirement for a safe harbor transfer; and
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series of Certificates will
require the transferee of a Residual Certificate to certify to the matters in
requirements (i) through (iii) above as part of the affidavit described above
107
The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that, except as
provided in Treasury regulations yet to be issued, the wash sale rules of Code
Section 1091 will apply to dispositions of Residual
108
Certificates where the seller of the Residual Certificate, during the period
beginning six months before the sale or disposition of the Residual Certificate
and ending six months after that sale or disposition, acquires (or enters into
any other transaction that results in the application of Code Section 1091) any
residual interest in any REMIC or any interest in a "taxable mortgage pool"
(such as a non-REMIC owner trust) that is economically comparable to a Residual
Certificate.
MARK-TO-MARKET REGULATIONS
PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 135/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
In general, the REMIC Pool will be subject to a tax at a 100% rate on the
value of any property contributed to the REMIC Pool after the Startup Day.
Exceptions are provided for cash contributions to the REMIC Pool (i) during the
three months following the Startup Day, (ii) made to a qualified reserve fund by
a Residual Holder, (iii) in the nature of a guarantee, (iv) made to facilitate a
qualified liquidation or cleanup call, and (v) as otherwise permitted in
Treasury regulations yet to be issued. It is not anticipated that there will be
any contributions to the REMIC Pool after the Startup Day.
The REMIC Pool will be subject to federal income tax at the highest
corporate rate on "net income from foreclosure property," determined by
reference to the rules applicable to real estate investment trusts. Generally,
property acquired by deed in lieu of foreclosure would be treated as
"foreclosure property" for a period not exceeding the close of the third
calendar year after the year in which the REMIC Pool acquired the property, with
a possible extension. Net income from foreclosure property generally means gain
from the sale of a foreclosure property that is inventory property and gross
income from foreclosure property other than qualifying rents and other
109
qualifying income for a real estate investment trust. It is not anticipated that
the REMIC Pool will have any taxable net income from foreclosure property.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
The REMIC Pool will be required to maintain its books on a calendar year
basis and to file federal income tax returns for federal income tax purposes in
a manner similar to a partnership. The form for this income tax return is Form
1066, U.S. Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit Income Tax Return. The
Trustee will be required to sign the REMIC Pool's returns. Treasury regulations
provide that, except where there is a single Residual Holder for an entire
taxable year, the REMIC Pool will be subject to the procedural and
administrative rules of the Code applicable to partnerships, including the
determination by the Internal Revenue Service of any adjustments to, among other
things, items of REMIC income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit in a unified
administrative proceeding. The Master Servicer or the Trustee, as specified in
the related pooling and servicing agreement, will be obligated to act as "tax
matters person," as defined in applicable Treasury regulations, with respect to
the REMIC Pool, in its capacity as either Residual Holder or agent of the
Residual Holders. If the Code or applicable Treasury regulations do not permit
the Master Servicer or the Trustee to act as tax matters person in its capacity
as agent of the Residual Holders, the Residual Holder chosen by the Residual
Holders or such other person specified pursuant to Treasury regulations will be
required to act as tax matters person.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 136/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
110
REGULAR CERTIFICATES
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES
The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act indicates that amounts
paid to Residual Holders who are non-U.S. Persons generally should be treated as
interest for purposes of the 30% (or lower treaty rate) United States
withholding tax. Treasury regulations provide that amounts distributed to
Residual Holders may qualify as "portfolio interest," subject to the conditions
described in "--Regular Certificates" above, but only if (i) the Mortgage Loans
were issued after July 18, 1984 and (ii) the Trust Estate or segregated pool of
assets in the Trust Estate (as to which a separate REMIC election will be made),
to which the Residual Certificate relates, consists of obligations issued in
"registered form" within the meaning of Code Section 163(f)(1). Generally,
Mortgage Loans will not be, but regular interests in another REMIC Pool will be,
considered obligations issued in registered form. Furthermore, a Residual Holder
will not be entitled to any exemption from the 30% withholding tax (or lower
treaty rate) to the extent of that portion of REMIC taxable income that
constitutes an "excess inclusion." See "--Taxation of Residual Certificates--
Limitations on Offset or Exemption of REMIC Income" above. If the amounts paid
to Residual Holders who are non-U.S. Persons are effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business within the United States by those non-U.S.
Persons, 30% (or lower treaty rate) withholding will not apply. Instead, the
amounts paid to the non-U.S. Persons will be subject to United States federal
income tax at regular rates. If 30% (or lower treaty rate) withholding is
applicable, those amounts generally will be taken into account for purposes of
withholding only when paid or otherwise distributed (or when the Residual
Certificate is disposed of) under rules
111
BACKUP WITHHOLDING
Distributions made on the Regular Certificates, and proceeds from the sale
of the Regular Certificates to or through certain brokers, may be subject to a
"backup" withholding tax under Code Section 3406 at the rate of 28% (increasing
to 31% after 2010) on "reportable payments" (including interest distributions,
Original Issue Discount, and, under certain circumstances, principal
distributions) unless the Regular Certificateholder is a U.S. Person and
provides IRS Form W-9 with the correct taxpayer identification number; is a
non-U.S. Person and provides IRS Form W-8BEN identifying the non-U.S. Person and
stating that the beneficial owner is not a U.S. Person; or can be treated as an
exempt recipient within the meaning of Treasury regulations Section
1.6049-4(c)(1)(ii). Any amounts to be withheld from distribution on the Regular
Certificates would be refunded by the IRS or allowed as a credit against the
Regular Certificateholder's federal income tax liability. Information reporting
requirements may also apply regardless of whether withholding is required.
Prospective investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding
the application to them of information reporting.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
GENERAL
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 139/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
112
corpus portions of the Trust Estate represented by its Certificate and will be
considered the beneficial owner of a pro rata undivided interest in each of the
Mortgage Loans, subject to the discussion below under "--Recharacterization of
Servicing Fees." Accordingly, the holder of a Certificate of a particular series
will be required to report on its federal income tax return its pro rata share
of the entire income from the Mortgage Loans represented by its Certificate,
including interest at the mortgage interest rate on the Mortgage Loans, Original
Issue Discount (if any), prepayment fees, assumption fees, and late payment
charges received by the Master Servicer, in accordance with that
certificateholder's method of accounting. A certificateholder generally will be
able to deduct its share of the servicing fee and all administrative and other
expenses of the Trust Estate in accordance with its method of accounting,
provided that those amounts are reasonable compensation for services rendered to
that Trust Estate. However, investors who are individuals, estates or trusts who
own Certificates, either directly or indirectly through certain pass-through
entities, will be subject to limitation with respect to certain itemized
deductions described in Code Section 67, including deductions under Code Section
212 for the servicing fee and all administrative and other expenses of the Trust
Estate, to the extent that the deductions, in the aggregate, do not exceed two
percent of an investor's adjusted gross income. In addition, Code Section 68
provides that itemized deductions otherwise allowable for a taxable year of an
individual taxpayer will be reduced by the lesser of (i) 3% of the excess, if
any, of adjusted gross income over a statutory threshold amount or (ii) 80% of
the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowable for that year. These
limitations will be phased out and eliminated by 2010. As a result, investors
holding Certificates, directly or indirectly through a pass-through entity, may
have aggregate taxable income in excess of the aggregate amount of cash received
on their Certificates relating to interest at the pass-through rate or as
discount income on their Certificates. In addition, these expenses are not
deductible at all for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax, and may
cause investors to be subject to significant additional tax liability. Moreover,
where there is Fixed Retained Yield on the Mortgage Loans underlying a series of
Certificates or where the servicing fees are in excess of reasonable servicing
compensation, the transaction will be subject to the application of the
"stripped bond" and "stripped coupon" rules of the Code, as described below
under "--Stripped Certificates" and "--Recharacterization of Servicing Fees."
TAX STATUS
Each of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP has advised the Depositor that, except as
described below with respect to Stripped Certificates:
113
PREMIUM
The Original Issue Discount rules of Code Sections 1271 through 1275 will
be applicable to a Certificateholder's interest in those Mortgage Loans as to
which the conditions for the application of those sections are met. Rules
regarding periodic inclusion of Original Issue Discount income are applicable to
mortgages of corporations originated after May 27, 1969, mortgages of
noncorporate mortgagors (other than individuals) originated after July 1, 1982,
and mortgages of individuals originated after March 2, 1984. Under the OID
Regulations, Original Issue Discount could arise by the charging of points by
the originator of the mortgages in an amount greater than the statutory de
minimis exception, including a payment of points that is currently deductible by
the borrower under applicable Code provisions or, under certain circumstances,
by the presence of "teaser" rates on the Mortgage Loans. See "--Stripped
Certificates" below regarding Original Issue Discount on Stripped Certificates.
MARKET DISCOUNT
114
STRIPPED CERTIFICATES
GENERAL
115
payments on each Mortgage Loan and/or "stripped coupons" relating to its pro
rata share of all or a portion of the interest payments on each Mortgage Loan,
including the Stripped Certificate's allocable share of the servicing fees paid
to a Master Servicer, if these fees represent reasonable compensation for
services rendered. See the discussion above under "--Recharacterization of
Servicing Fees." Although not free from doubt, for purposes of reporting to
Stripped Certificateholders, the servicing fees will be allocated to the
Stripped Certificates in proportion to the respective entitlements to
distributions of each class of Stripped Certificates for the related period or
periods. The holder of a Stripped Certificate generally will be entitled to a
deduction each year in respect of the servicing fees, as described above under
"--General," subject to the limitation described in that section.
based on pricing information as of the related closing date for the series, will
largely fail to reflect the accurate accruals of original issue discount for
these securities. Prospective investors therefore should be aware that the
timing of accruals of original issue discount applicable to a Stripped
Certificates generally will be different than that reported to
Certificateholders and the Internal Revenue Service. You should consult your own
tax advisor regarding your obligation to compute and include in income the
correct amount of original issue discount accruals and any possible tax
consequences to you if you should fail to do so.
116
If the Mortgage Loans prepay at a rate either faster or slower than that
under the Prepayment Assumption, a Stripped Certificateholder's recognition of
Original Issue Discount will be either accelerated or decelerated and the amount
of the Original Issue Discount will be either increased or decreased depending
on the relative interests in principal and interest on each Mortgage Loan
represented by the Stripped Certificateholder's Stripped Certificate. While the
matter is not free from doubt, the holder of a Stripped Certificate should be
entitled in the year that it becomes certain (assuming no further prepayments)
that the holder will not recover a portion of its adjusted basis in the Stripped
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 145/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
As an alternative to the method described above, the fact that some or all
of the interest payments with respect to the Stripped Certificates will not be
made if the Mortgage Loans are prepaid could lead to the interpretation that the
interest payments are "contingent" within the meaning of the OID Regulations.
The OID Regulations, as they relate to the treatment of contingent interest, are
by their terms not applicable to prepayable securities like as the Stripped
Certificates. However, if final regulations dealing with contingent interest
with respect to the Stripped Certificates apply the same principles as the OID
Regulations, those regulations may lead to different timing of income inclusion
than would be the case under the OID Regulations for non-contingent debt
instruments. Furthermore, application of these principles could lead to the
characterization of gain on the sale of contingent interest Stripped
Certificates as ordinary income. Investors should consult their tax advisors
regarding the appropriate tax treatment of Stripped Certificates.
117
118
will be required to file information returns with the IRS and provide tax
information statements to Certificateholders in accordance with these new
regulations after December 31, 2007.
TAX STATUS
119
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 148/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Original Issue Discount equal to the excess, if any, of its "stated redemption
price at maturity" over the price paid by the owner to acquire it. The stated
redemption price at maturity for a Disproportionate Exchangeable Certificate is
determined in the same manner as described with respect to REMIC regular
interests under "--Federal Income Tax Consequences for REMIC
Certificates--Taxation of Regular Certificates--Original Issue Discount."
While the matter is not free from doubt, if a beneficial owner acquires a
combination of Exchangeable Certificates in separate transactions which in the
aggregate represent a single REMIC regular interest, it appears that the owner
should account for each such Exchangeable Certificate separately, even if it
exchanges the Exchangeable Certificates for the underlying REMIC regular
interest. However, if a beneficial owner acquires such a combination in a single
transaction, it is possible that the beneficial owner's interests should be
aggregated, with the beneficial owner treated as owning the underlying REMIC
regular interest (regardless of whether it has exchanged the Exchangeable
Certificates for the underlying REMIC regular interest). Accounting separately
for the Exchangeable Certificates may lead to significantly different accruals
of interest and Original Issue Discount than would be the case if the owner
aggregated such interests. Prospective investors should consult their own tax
advisors as to the proper treatment of an Exchangeable Certificate in either of
these circumstances.
corresponding federal law, and this discussion does not purport to describe any
aspect of the income tax laws of any state. Potential investors should consult
their tax advisors with respect to the various tax consequences of investments
in the Certificates.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Certificates are being offered by this prospectus and the applicable
prospectus supplement through one or more of the various methods described
below. The applicable prospectus supplement for each series will describe the
method of offering being used for that series. The prospectus supplement will
state the public offering or
120
The Certificates will be offered through the following methods from time
to time and offerings may be made concurrently through more than one of these
methods or an offering of a series of Certificates may be made through a
combination of two or more of the following methods:
121
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Depositor will apply the net proceeds from the sale of each series of
Certificates for the purchase of the Mortgage Assets serving as security for
those Certificates.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LEGAL MATTERS
The legality of, and certain federal income tax matters related to, the
Certificates of a series will be passed upon for the Depositor by Orrick,
Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, D.C., Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP,
New York, New York or Hunton &Williams LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, as
specified in the related prospectus supplement.
RATING
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 151/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
The Trustee or the Master Servicer will prepare and make available to the
certificateholders of each series statements containing information with respect
to principal and interest payments and the related Trust Estate, as described
under "Description of Certificates--Reports to Certificateholders." Copies of
these statements will be filed with the Commission through its EDGAR system
located at http://www.sec.gov under the name of the Trust as an exhibit to the
Trust's monthly distribution reports on Form 10-D for each series of
Certificates for so long as the Trust is subject to the reporting requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Monthly distribution reports
on Form 10-D are generally due within 15 days after each Distribution Date,
unless such due date falls on a weekend or holiday, in which case the due date
extends to the first business day following. In addition, each party to the
servicing function, for a series of Certificates (generally the Trustee and the
Servicer (any Master Servicer)) will furnish to the Trustee or Master Servicer,
as applicable, the compliance statements, Assessments of Compliance and
Attestation Reports detailed under "The Pooling and Servicing
Agreement--Evidence as to Compliance." Copies of these statements and reports
will be filed with the SEC under the name of the Trust as an exhibit to the
Trust's annual statement on Form 10-K for each series of Certificates.
122
At your request, the Depositor will send copies of these documents and
reports to you at no charge. You may contact the Depositor by writing or calling
it at the address and phone number listed under "Where You Can Find More
Information."
Copies of the registration statement and any other materials the Depositor
files with the Commission, including distribution reports on Form 10-D, annual
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 152/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
reports, on Form 10-K, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these
reports (collectively, "PERIODIC REPORTS"), may be read and copied at the
Commission's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Information concerning the operation of the Commission's Public Reference
Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at (800) SEC-0330. The Commission
also maintains an Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov at which you can view
and download copies of reports, proxy and information statements and other
information filed electronically through the EDGAR system. Our SEC filings may
be located by using the SEC Central Index Key (CIK) for the depositor,
0000934377. For purposes of any electronic version of this prospectus, the
preceding uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive textual reference
only. We have taken steps to ensure that this URL was inactive at the time we
created any electronic version of this prospectus. The Depositor has filed the
registration statement, including all exhibits, through the EDGAR system and
therefore those materials should be available by logging onto the Commission's
Web site. The Commission maintains computer terminals providing access to the
EDGAR system at the office referred to above. Copies of any documents
incorporated to this prospectus by reference will be provided to each person to
whom a prospectus is delivered upon written or oral request directed to Banc of
America Funding Corporation, 214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
28255, Attention: Secretary, telephone number (704) 386-2400.
At such time as may be required under relevant SEC rules and regulations,
we may provide static pool information otherwise required to be set forth in
this prospectus through an Internet Web site. If we determine to do so, the
prospectus supplement accompanying this prospectus will disclose the specific
Internet address where the information is posted.
123
INDEX OF TERMS
PAGE
----
1986 Act.....................................................................96
Accretion Directed Certificates..............................................36
Accrual Certificates.........................................................38
Advances.....................................................................64
Assessment of Compliance.....................................................70
Asset Conservation Act.......................................................85
Attestation Report...........................................................70
Auction Administrator........................................................40
Auction Certificates.........................................................40
Auction Distribution Date....................................................40
Balloon Loans................................................................20
Balloon Period...............................................................20
Bank of America..............................................................54
Bankruptcy Code..............................................................78
Beneficial Owners............................................................29
Benefit Plans................................................................86
Book-Entry Certificates......................................................29
Buy Down Fund................................................................20
Buy Down Loans...............................................................20
Cash Flow Agreement..........................................................49
CERCLA.......................................................................84
CERCLA Secured-Creditor Exemption............................................84
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 153/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Certificates.................................................................27
Code.........................................................................93
Combination..................................................................40
Commission..................................................................122
Companion Certificates.......................................................36
Component Certificates.......................................................36
Cooperatives.................................................................21
Cut-Off Date.................................................................59
Deferred Interest............................................................18
Definitive Certificates......................................................28
Depositor....................................................................54
Disproportionate Exchangeable Certificate...................................119
Disqualified Organization...................................................106
Distribution Account.........................................................27
Distribution Date............................................................34
DOL..........................................................................86
DOL Regulations..............................................................87
Due-on-Sale..................................................................81
Electing Large Partnership..................................................106
Eligible Custodial Account...................................................62
Eligible Investments.........................................................62
ERISA........................................................................86
ERISA Plans..................................................................86
Escrow Account...............................................................65
Euroclear Operator...........................................................31
European Depositaries........................................................29
Exchangeable Certificates....................................................40
Exempt Plans.................................................................86
Fannie Mae Certificates......................................................25
FHA..........................................................................23
FHA Loans....................................................................23
Financial Intermediary.......................................................29
Fitch........................................................................88
Fixed Retained Yield.........................................................69
Fixed-Rate Certificates......................................................38
Floating-Rate Certificates...................................................39
Foreign Persons.............................................................119
Freddie Mac Act..............................................................24
Freddie Mac Certificates.....................................................24
Garn Act.....................................................................81
Ginnie Mae Certificates......................................................23
Ginnie Mae I Certificates....................................................23
Ginnie Mae II Certificates...................................................23
Graduated Pay Mortgage Loans.................................................19
Gross Margin.................................................................18
Growing Equity Mortgage Loans................................................19
HOPA.........................................................................83
Housing Act..................................................................23
HUD..........................................................................23
Indirect Participants........................................................29
Interest Only Mortgage Loans.................................................19
Interest-Only Certificates...................................................39
Inverse Floating-Rate Certificates...........................................39
IO Certificates..............................................................39
IRA..........................................................................86
Liquidation Proceeds.........................................................62
Lockout Certificates.........................................................36
Mark-to-Market Regulations..................................................109
Master Servicer..............................................................56
Master Servicer Custodial Account............................................62
MERS.........................................................................59
Moody's......................................................................88
Mortgage Assets..............................................................17
Mortgage Certificates........................................................17
Mortgage Loans...............................................................17
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 154/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
NCUA.........................................................................92
Non-ERISA Plans..............................................................86
Non-Pro Rata Certificate.....................................................97
Nonrecoverable Advance.......................................................65
Non-SMMEA Certificates.......................................................91
Notional Amount Certificates.................................................36
OCC..........................................................................54
OID Regulations..............................................................96
Option ARM Mortgage Loans....................................................18
Original Issue Discount......................................................96
PAC Certificates.............................................................37
PAC I........................................................................37
PAC II.......................................................................37
Par Price....................................................................40
Participants.................................................................29
Pass-Through Certificates....................................................36
Pass-through Entity.........................................................106
Paying Agent.................................................................64
PC Agreement.................................................................26
124
INDEX OF TERMS
PAGE
----
PC Servicer..................................................................26
PC Sponsor...................................................................26
PC Trustee...................................................................26
Periodic Advance.............................................................64
Periodic Reports............................................................123
Planned Amortization Certificates............................................37
PO Certificates..............................................................39
Prepayment Assumption........................................................97
Principal-Only Certificates..................................................39
Private Certificates.........................................................25
PTCE.........................................................................86
Ratio Strip Certificates.....................................................37
RCRA.........................................................................84
RCRA Secured-Creditor Exemption..............................................84
Regular Certificateholder....................................................96
Regular Certificates.........................................................94
Related......................................................................40
Relevant Depositary..........................................................29
Relief Act...................................................................83
REMIC........................................................................94
REMIC Certificates...........................................................94
REMIC Pool...................................................................94
REO Property.................................................................65
Residual Certificates........................................................94
Residual Holders............................................................102
Restricted Group.............................................................89
Rules........................................................................29
S&P..........................................................................88
Scheduled Amortization Certificates..........................................37
Senior Certificates..........................................................37
Sequential Pay Certificates..................................................38
Servicer.....................................................................57
Servicer Custodial Account...................................................62
Servicing Advances...........................................................64
SMMEA........................................................................91
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 155/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm
Sponsor......................................................................54
Standard Hazard Insurance Policy.............................................67
Startup Day..................................................................95
Step Coupon Certificates.....................................................39
Stripped Certificateholder..................................................117
Stripped Certificates.......................................................115
Subordinate Certificates.....................................................38
Subsidy Account..............................................................19
Subsidy Loans................................................................19
Subsidy Payments.............................................................19
Super Senior Certificates....................................................38
Super Senior Support Certificates............................................38
Support Certificates.........................................................36
TAC Certificates.............................................................38
Targeted Amortization Certificates...........................................38
Texas Home Equity Laws.......................................................81
Tiered Payment Mortgage Loans................................................19
Title V......................................................................82
Trust........................................................................17
Trust Estate.................................................................17
Trustee......................................................................17
U.S. Person.................................................................108
UCC..........................................................................77
Underlying Loans.............................................................25
Underlying Servicing Agreement...............................................57
Underwriter's Exemption......................................................88
VA ..........................................................................23
Variable Rate Certificates...................................................39
Window Period................................................................81
Window Period Loans..........................................................81
Window Period States.........................................................81
125
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606004942/file1.htm 156/156
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
424B5 1 file1.htm
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(TO PROSPECTUS DATED JUNE 28, 2006)
$558,078,100
(APPROXIMATE)
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-F
PRINCIPAL AND/OR INTEREST PAYABLE MONTHLY, BEGINNING IN JULY 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE S-17 OF THIS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.
Neither the Offered Certificates nor the mortgage loans are insured or
guaranteed by any governmental agency or instrumentality.
The Offered Certificates represent interests in the Issuing Entity only and will
not be obligations of the Depositor, the Sponsor or any other entity.
This prospectus supplement may be used to offer and sell the Offered
Certificates only if accompanied by the prospectus. Please read both documents
carefully to understand the risks associated with these investments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The classes of Offered Certificates are listed and their sizes and basic payment
characteristics are described in the table on page S-6.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 1/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR DETERMINED THAT THIS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S-2
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 3/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S-3
----------
S-4
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year; (2) a total
balance sheet of more than (euro)43,000,000 and (3) an annual net
turnover of more than (euro)50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts; or
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 5/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
UNITED KINGDOM
S-5
INITIAL
RATING OF
PASS- CERTIFICATE(3)
INITIAL CLASS THROUGH INTEREST --------------
CLASS BALANCE(1) RATE PRINCIPAL TYPE(2) TYPE(2) FITCH S&P
------------------------ ------------- ------- -------------------------- ------------- ------ -----
OFFERED CERTIFICATES
Class 1-A-1 $196,119,000 (4) Super Senior, Pass-Through Variable Rate AAA AAA
Class 1-A-2 $ 20,405,000 (4) Super Senior Support, Variable Rate AAA AAA
Pass-Through
Class 1-A-R $ 100 (4) Senior, Sequential Pay Variable Rate AAA AAA
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 6/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Class 2-A-1 $192,425,000 (5) Super Senior, Pass-Through Variable Rate AAA AAA
Class 2-A-2 $ 20,021,000 (5) Super Senior Support, Variable Rate AAA AAA
Pass-Through
Class 3-A-1 $ 97,840,000 (6) Super Senior, Pass-Through Variable Rate AAA AAA
Class 3-A-2 $ 10,180,000 (6) Super Senior Support, Variable Rate AAA AAA
Pass-Through
Class B-1 $ 14,621,000 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate AA None
Class B-2 $ 3,936,000 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate A None
Class B-3 $ 2,531,000 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate BBB None
NON-OFFERED CERTIFICATES
Class B-4 $ 1,406,000 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate BB BB-
Class B-5 $ 1,405,000 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate B B
Class B-6 $ 1,406,497 (7) Subordinated Variable Rate None None
----------
(1) Approximate. The initial class balances of the Offered Certificates may vary
by a total of plus or minus 5%.
(3) The Offered Certificates will not be issued unless they receive at least the
ratings set forth in this table. See "Certificate Ratings" in this prospectus
supplement.
(4) Interest will accrue on these Certificates at a per annum rate equal to the
weighted average of the Net Mortgage Interest Rates of the Group 1 Mortgage
Loans (based on the Stated Principal Balances of the Group 1 Mortgage Loans on
the due date in the month preceding the month of such Distribution Date). For
the initial Distribution Date in July 2006, this rate is expected to be
approximately 5.174414% per annum.
(5) Interest will accrue on these Certificates at a per annum rate equal to the
weighted average of the Net Mortgage Interest Rates of the Group 2 Mortgage
Loans (based on the Stated Principal Balances of the Group 2 Mortgage Loans on
the due date in the month preceding the month of such Distribution Date). For
the initial Distribution Date in July 2006, this rate is expected to be
approximately 5.875864% per annum.
(6) Interest will accrue on these Certificates at a per annum rate equal to the
weighted average of the Net Mortgage Interest Rates of the Group 3 Mortgage
Loans (based on the Stated Principal Balances of the Group 3 Mortgage Loans on
the due date in the month preceding the month of such Distribution Date). For
the initial Distribution Date in July 2006, this rate is expected to be
approximately 5.976373% per annum.
(7) Interest will accrue on these Certificates at a per annum rate equal to the
weighted average (based on the Group Subordinate Amount for each Loan Group) of
the weighted average of the Net Mortgage Interest Rates of each of the Mortgage
Loans (based on the Stated Principal Balances of the Mortgage Loans in each Loan
Group on the due date in the month preceding the month of such Distribution
Date). For the initial Distribution Date in July 2006, this rate is expected to
be approximately 5.613246% per annum.
S-6
SUMMARY OF TERMS
prospectus carefully.
----------
THE TRANSACTION
On the closing date, the Sponsor will sell the Mortgage Loans to the
Depositor, who will in turn deposit them into a New York common law trust, which
is the Issuing Entity. The Issuing Entity will be formed by a pooling and
servicing agreement, to be dated the closing date, among the Depositor, the
Servicer, the Securities Administrator and the Trustee. The Servicer will
service the Mortgage Loans in accordance with the pooling and servicing
agreement. The Securities Administrator will calculate distributions and other
information regarding the Certificates.
The transfers of the mortgage loans from the Sponsor to the Depositor
to the Issuing Entity in exchange for the Certificates are illustrated below:
---------
Sponsor
---------
| |
| |
Mortgage Loans | | Cash Offered
| | Certificates
--------- -----------------------------> -----------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 8/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Depositor Underwriter
--------- <---------------------------- -----------
| | Cash | |
| | | |
Mortgage Loans | | All Certificates | |
| | | |
| | Offered | | Cash
--------- Certificates | |
Issuing | |
Entity ---------
--------- Investors
---------
S-7
OFFERED CERTIFICATES
Only the Senior Certificates and the Class B-1, Class B-2 and Class
B-3 Certificates are offered by this prospectus supplement.
The Class B-4, Class B-5 and Class B-6 Certificates are not offered by
this prospectus supplement.
losses on the Mortgage Loans and the Subordinate Certificates with higher
numerical designations are subordinated to the Subordinate Certificates with
lower numerical designations for distributions of principal and interest and for
allocations of losses on the Mortgage Loans.
MORTGAGE POOL
The Mortgage Loans provide for a fixed interest rate during an initial
period and thereafter provide for adjustments to the interest rate on an annual
basis. The interest rate of each Mortgage Loan will adjust to equal the sum of
an index and a gross margin. Interest rate adjustments generally will be subject
to certain limitations stated in the related mortgage note on increases and
decreases for any adjustment. In addition, interest rate adjustments will be
subject to an overall maximum mortgage interest rate and a minimum mortgage
interest rate equal to the
S-8
related gross margin. The index for each Mortgage Loan will be either the weekly
average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant
maturity of one year, as made available by the Federal Reserve Board and
published in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 (519), or the arithmetic
mean of the London interbank offered rate quotations for one-year U.S.
Dollar-denominated deposits as published in The Wall Street Journal.
RANGE, TOTAL
OR PERCENTAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 10/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
---------------------- ----------------
----------
(1) The balance shown is the average unpaid principal balance of the Group 1
Mortgage Loans.
S-9
----------
(1) The balance shown is the average unpaid principal balance of the Group 2
Mortgage Loans.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 11/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
RANGE, TOTAL OR PERCENTAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
-------------------------- ----------------
----------
(1) The balance shown is the average unpaid principal balance of the Group 3
Mortgage Loans.
S-10
----------
(1) The balance shown is the average unpaid principal balance of the Mortgage
Loans.
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
The administrative fees for the Mortgage Loans shown in the table
below are payable out of the interest payments on the Mortgage Loans, prior to
any distributions to certificateholders. The administrative fees, which consist
of the servicing fees and the securities administration fees, accrue on the
Mortgage Loans at the administrative fee rates set forth in the table below. In
addition to the servicing fees, the Servicer will be entitled to retain as
additional servicing compensation (i) any ancillary income, consisting of late
payment fees, assumption fees and other similar charges, (ii) net income from
investment of funds in the servicer custodial account, (iii) any profits from
the liquidation of Mortgage Loans and (iv) with respect to any Group 1 Mortgage
Loan, any incremental interest resulting from an increase in the related
mortgage interest rate in connection with failure of the mortgagor to maintain
certain accounts and balances with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The Securities
Administrator will receive, in addition to its securities administration fees,
net income from the investment of funds in the certificate account. See "The
Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Compensation and Payment of Expenses of the
S-11
RATE
FEE (PER ANNUM)
---------------------------------- -----------
Servicing Fee Rate 0.2500%
Securities Administration Fee Rate 0.0035%
OPTIONAL TERMINATION
to certain conditions, purchase all remaining Mortgage Loans, which would effect
an early retirement of the Certificates; however, any optional termination will
be permitted only pursuant to a "qualified liquidation" as defined under Section
860F of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The final scheduled maturity date for the Offered Certificates will be
the distribution date in July 2036. The final scheduled maturity date represents
the distribution date in the month following the latest maturity date of any
Mortgage Loan. The actual final payment on your Certificates could occur earlier
or later than the final scheduled maturity date.
The Offered Certificates (other than the Class 1-A-R Certificate) will
be issuable in book-entry form only. The Class 1-A-R Certificate will be issued
in definitive, fully-registered form. The following table sets forth the
original Certificate form, the minimum denomination and the incremental
denomination of the Offered Certificates. The Offered Certificates are not
intended to be and should not be directly or indirectly held or beneficially
owned in amounts lower than such minimum denominations.
ORIGINAL
CERTIFICATE MINIMUM INCREMENTAL
CLASS FORM DENOMINATION DENOMINATION
-------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ------------
PRIORITY OF DISTRIBUTIONS
S-12
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| first, to the Senior Certificates of the Group to pay |
| interest; |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
\|/
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|second, to the Senior Certificates of the Group entitled to |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 14/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS
PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTIONS
CREDIT SUPPORT
Subordination
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 15/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-13
|-------------------------|
Priority of | Senior Certificates |
Payment |(Credit Support 4.50%) |
|-------------------------|
| Class B-1 | /|\
| |(Credit Support 1.90%) | |
| |-------------------------| |
| | Class B-2 | |
| |(Credit Support 1.20%) | |
| |-------------------------| |
| | Class B-3 | |
| |(Credit Support 0.75%) | |
| |-------------------------| |
| | Class B-4 | |
\|/ |(Credit Support 0.50%) | |
|-------------------------|
| Class B-5 |
|(Credit Support 0.25%) |
|-------------------------|
| Class B-6 | Order of
|(Credit Support 0.00%) | Loss Allocation
--------------------------
--------------
(1) The credit support percentage set forth in this chart shows the initial
class balance of the classes of Certificates subordinate to a class or
classes as a percentage of the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the
mortgage loans as of the cut-off date.
Cross-Collateralization
S-14
The yield to maturity of the Class B-1, Class B-2 and Class B-3
Certificates will be increasingly sensitive to the amounts and timing of losses
on the Mortgage Loans due to the fact that, once the aggregate class balance of
the classes of Subordinate Certificates with higher numerical designations has
been reduced to zero, all losses will be allocated to the Class B-3, Class B-2
and Class B-1 Certificates, in that order, until the class balance of each class
has been reduced to zero.
CPR(2)
------------------------------------------------
Class 0% 10% 20% 25% 30% 40% 50%
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 17/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
----------
(1) Determined as described under "Prepayment and Yield
Considerations--Weighted Average Lives of the Offered Certificates" in this
prospectus supplement. Prepayments will not occur at any assumed rate shown
or any other constant rate, and the actual weighted average lives of any or
all of the classes of Offered Certificates are likely to differ from those
shown, perhaps significantly.
(2) "CPR" is the Constant Prepayment Rate which is described under "Prepayment
and Yield Considerations--Weighted Average Lives of the Offered
Certificates" in this prospectus supplement.
For federal income tax purposes, elections will be made to treat the
Issuing Entity as multiple separate "real estate mortgage investment conduits"
(consisting of an "UPPER-TIER REMIC" and one or more "LOWER-TIER REMICS," and
each, a "REMIC").
S-15
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 18/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
LEGAL INVESTMENT
o The Class B-2 and Class B-3 Certificates will not constitute
"mortgage related securities" under SMMEA.
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
AFFILIATIONS
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. serves or has served within the past two years
as loan file custodian for various mortgage loans owned by the Sponsor or an
affiliate of the Sponsor and anticipates that one or more of those mortgage
loans may be included in the Issuing Entity. The terms of the custodial
agreement under which those services are provided by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are
customary for the mortgage-backed securitization industry and provide for the
delivery, receipt, review and safekeeping of mortgage loan files.
S-16
RISK FACTORS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 19/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
o The risk factors discussed below and under the heading "Risk
Factors" in the prospectus describe the material risks of an
investment in the Offered Certificates and should be
carefully considered by all potential investors.
MORTGAGE LOANS PAYING INTEREST ONLY DURING THE RELATED INTEREST ONLY PERIOD MAY
HAVE A HIGHER RISK OF DELINQUENCY, DEFAULT OR RATES OF PREPAYMENT
Mortgage loans with an initial interest only period are relatively new
in the secondary mortgage market. The performance of these mortgage loans may be
significantly different from mortgage loans that amortize from origination. In
particular these mortgagors may be more likely to refinance their mortgage
loans, which may result in higher prepayment speeds than would otherwise be the
case.
THE RATE OF PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS ON THE MORTGAGE LOANS WILL AFFECT THE YIELD ON
THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES
S-17
expected.
DELINQUENCIES AND LOSSES ON THE MORTGAGE LOANS WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT YOUR YIELD
S-18
THERE ARE RISKS RELATING TO MORTGAGED PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO SECOND LIEN MORTGAGE
LOANS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 22/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
DECREMENT AND SENSITIVITY TABLES ARE BASED UPON ASSUMPTIONS AND MODELS
S-19
average lives of the Offered Certificates may differ from the weighted average
lives shown in the related tables on page S-15 of this prospectus supplement and
in Appendix B to this prospectus supplement.
THERE IS A RISK THAT INTEREST PAYMENTS ON THE MORTGAGE LOANS MAY BE INSUFFICIENT
TO PAY INTEREST ON YOUR CERTIFICATES
MORTGAGE LOANS WITH LARGE PRINCIPAL BALANCES MAY INCREASE RISK OF LOSS ON
CERTIFICATES
In addition, any realized loss that reduces the class balances of the
Subordinate Certificates decreases the subordination provided to the Senior
Certificates and increases the risk that the Senior Certificates will have to
bear realized losses in the future.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 24/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-20
on the Mortgage Loans in any of the Loan Groups will reduce the subordination
provided by the Subordinate Certificates to all of the Senior Certificates and
increase the likelihood that Realized Losses may be allocated to those Senior
Certificates. See "Description of Certificates--Allocation of Losses" herein.
THE TIMING OF CHANGES IN THE RATE OF PREPAYMENTS MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE
ACTUAL YIELD TO YOU, EVEN IF THE AVERAGE RATE OF PRINCIPAL PREPAYMENTS IS
CONSISTENT WITH YOUR EXPECTATIONS
THE VARIABLE RATE OF INTEREST ON THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WILL AFFECT YOUR YIELD
The mortgage interest rate on each Mortgage Loan will be fixed for an
initial period of approximately five or seven years from its date of
origination. After the applicable fixed-rate period, the mortgage interest rate
on each Mortgage Loan will adjust annually to equal the sum of the applicable
index and a gross margin. Mortgage interest rate adjustments will be subject to
the limitations stated in the mortgage note on increases and decreases for any
adjustment (i.e., a "periodic cap"). In addition, the mortgage interest rate for
each Mortgage Loan will be subject to an overall maximum mortgage interest rate
and a minimum mortgage interest rate equal to the applicable gross margin. The
pass through rate on each certificate may decrease, and may decrease
significantly, after the mortgage interest rates on the applicable Mortgage
Loans begin to adjust as a result of, among other factors, the dates of
adjustment, the gross margins and changes in one-year LIBOR or one-year CMT. In
addition, even if one-year LIBOR or one-year CMT increases, a rate ceiling or a
periodic cap may limit the mortgage interest rate, which could adversely affect
the yield on the related Certificates.
Mortgage interest rates on the Mortgage Loans at any time may not
equal the prevailing mortgage interest rates for similar adjustable-rate loans,
and accordingly the prepayment rate may be lower or higher than would otherwise
be anticipated. Moreover, some mortgagors who prefer the certainty provided by
fixed-rate mortgage loans may nevertheless obtain adjustable-rate mortgage loans
(especially if they are able to obtain a "Relationship ARM," which has a below
market interest rate during the fixed-rate period) at a time when they regard
the mortgage interest rates (and, therefore, the payments) on fixed-rate
mortgage loans as unacceptably high. These mortgagors may be induced to
refinance adjustable-rate mortgage loans when the mortgage interest rates and
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 25/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-21
LIMITED LIQUIDITY
The Underwriter intends to make a market for purchase and sale of the
Offered Certificates after their initial issuance, but the Underwriter has no
obligation to do so. There is no assurance that such a secondary market will
develop or, if it does develop, that it will provide you with liquidity of
investment or that it will continue for the life of the Offered Certificates. As
a result, you may not be able to sell your Certificates or you may not be able
to sell your Certificates at a high enough price to produce your desired return
on investment.
RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE VALUES MAY FLUCTUATE AND ADVERSELY AFFECT YOUR
INVESTMENT
S-22
decrease in employment reducing the demand for housing in an area. To the extent
that credit enhancements do not cover such losses, your yield may be adversely
impacted.
THE RECORDING OF THE MORTGAGES IN THE NAME OF MERS MAY AFFECT THE YIELD ON THE
CERTIFICATES
THE SPONSOR OR THE ORIGINATOR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REPURCHASE DEFECTIVE MORTGAGE
LOANS
The Sponsor and the Originator will make various representations and
warranties related to the Mortgage Loans. If the Sponsor or the Originator, as
applicable, fails to cure a material breach of its representations and
warranties with respect to any Mortgage Loan sold by it in a timely manner, then
the Sponsor or the Originator, as applicable, would be required to repurchase,
or in certain circumstances, substitute for, the defective Mortgage Loan. It is
possible that the Sponsor or the Originator may not be capable of repurchasing
or substituting for any defective mortgage loans, for financial or other
reasons. The inability of the Sponsor or the Originator to repurchase or
substitute for defective Mortgage Loans would likely cause the Mortgage Loans to
experience higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses. As a result,
shortfalls in the distributions due on the Certificates could occur.
S-23
UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS MAY INCREASE RISK OF RELIEF ACT SHORTFALLS
S-24
The Mortgage Loans in each Loan Group and in all of the Loan Groups in
the aggregate have the characteristics set forth in the tables under "Summary of
Terms--Mortgage Pool."
The Mortgage Loans will be sold by the Sponsor to the Depositor on the
Closing Date pursuant to a mortgage loan purchase agreement between the Sponsor
and the Depositor (the "MORTGAGE LOAN PURCHASE AGREEMENT"). See "The Pooling and
Servicing Agreement--Repurchases of Mortgage Loans" in this prospectus
supplement.
The Mortgage Loans were selected by the Sponsor, with advice from Banc
of America Securities LLC as to the characteristics of the Mortgage Loans that
will optimize marketability of the Certificates, from the Sponsor's acquired
portfolio of first lien, closed-end, adjustable-rate mortgage loans, and were
chosen to meet the requirements imposed by the rating agencies to achieve the
credit support percentages listed under "Summary of Terms--Credit
Support--Subordination."
S-25
principal balance of the Mortgage Loan at origination divided by (ii) the lesser
of (a) the appraised value of the related mortgaged property, as established by
an appraisal obtained by the Originator generally no more than four months prior
to origination (or, with respect to newly constructed properties, no more than
twelve months prior to origination), or (ii) the sale price for such mortgaged
property. In some instances, the Loan-to-Value Ratio may be based on an
appraisal that was obtained by the Originator more than four months prior to
origination, provided that (i) an appraisal update is obtained and (ii) the
original appraisal was obtained no more than twelve months prior to origination.
For the purpose of calculating the Loan-to-Value Ratio of any mortgage loan
originated by Wells Fargo Bank that is the result of the refinancing (including
a refinancing for "equity take out" purposes) of an existing mortgage loan, the
appraised value of the related mortgaged property is generally determined by
reference to an appraisal obtained in connection with the origination of the
replacement loan. The value of any mortgaged property generally will change from
the level that existed on the appraisal or sales date. If residential real
estate values generally or in a particular geographic area decline, the
Loan-to-Value Ratios might not be a reliable indicator of the rates of
delinquencies, foreclosures and losses that could occur with respect to the
Mortgage Loans. For more information on the Loan-to-Value Ratios of the Mortgage
Loans, see the "Original Loan-to-Value Ratios" tables in Appendix A to this
prospectus supplement. Certain of the Mortgage Loans with Loan-to-Value Ratios
at origination in excess of 80% may be covered by a primary mortgage guaranty
insurance policy which conforms to the standards of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
No such primary mortgage insurance policy will be required with respect to any
such Mortgage Loan after the date on which the related Loan-to-Value Ratio is
less than 80%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Mortgage Loan which at
origination was covered by a primary mortgage guaranty insurance policy may no
longer be covered by such policy as a result of the mortgagor obtaining an
appraisal after origination indicating a loan-to-value ratio at the time of such
appraisal of less than 80%.
The Originator may have used Credit Scores as part of its origination
processes. "CREDIT SCORES" are statistical credit scores obtained by many
mortgage lenders in connection with the loan application to help assess a
borrower's credit-worthiness. Credit Scores are generated by models developed by
a third party and are made available to lenders through three national credit
bureaus, Experian (FICO), Equifax (Beacon) and TransUnion (Empirica). The models
were derived by analyzing data on consumers in order to establish patterns which
are believed to be indicative of the borrower's probability of default. A Credit
Score is based on a borrower's historical credit data, including, among other
things, payment history, delinquencies on accounts, levels of outstanding
indebtedness, length of credit history, types of credit and bankruptcy
experience. Credit Scores range from approximately 300 to approximately 850,
with higher scores indicating an individual with a more favorable credit history
compared to an individual with a lower score. However, a Credit Score purports
only to be a measurement of the relative degree of risk a borrower represents to
a lender, i.e., that a borrower with a higher score is statistically expected to
be less likely to default in payment than a borrower with a lower score. In
addition, it should be noted that Credit Scores were developed to indicate a
level of default probability over a two-year period which does not correspond to
the life of a mortgage loan. Furthermore, Credit Scores were not developed
specifically for use in connection with mortgage loans, but for consumer loans
in general. Therefore, a Credit Score does not take into consideration the
effect of mortgage loan characteristics on the probability of repayment by the
borrower. The Credit Scores set forth in the tables in Appendix A to this
prospectus supplement were obtained at either the time of origination of the
Mortgage Loan or more recently. None of the Depositor, the Sponsor or the
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 31/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-26
Loan. On the first due date following each Adjustment Date for each Mortgage
Loan, the monthly payment for the Mortgage Loan will be adjusted, if necessary,
to an amount that will fully amortize such Mortgage Loan at the adjusted
mortgage interest rate over its remaining scheduled term to maturity. See the
tables in Appendix A to this prospectus supplement for certain statistical
information on Rate Ceilings applicable to the Mortgage Loans in each Loan
Group.
The index for all of the Mortgage Loans in Loan Group 1 and Loan Group
3 and approximately 67.98% of the Mortgage Loans in Loan Group 2 will be the
weekly average yield on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant
maturity of one year, as made available by the Federal Reserve Board, published
in Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 (519) ("ONE-YEAR CMT") and most
recently available as of the date 45 days before the applicable Adjustment Date.
In the event One-Year CMT is no longer available, the Servicer will select a
substitute index in accordance with the terms of the related mortgage note in
compliance with federal and state law.
Listed below are historical average values of One-Year CMT for the
months and years shown below. The monthly averages shown are intended only to
provide an historical summary of the movements of One-Year CMT and may not be
indicative of future rates. The source of the values of One-Year CMT used in
determining the monthly averages shown below is Bloomberg Professional
Services(R).
YEAR
---------------------------------------
MONTH 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
------------------------------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
January....................... 4.45% 2.86% 1.24% 1.36% 2.16% 4.81%
February...................... 4.68 3.03 1.24 1.30 2.23 4.68
March......................... 4.77 3.30 1.19 1.24 2.57 4.30
April......................... 4.90 3.32 1.43 1.27 2.48 3.98
May........................... 5.00 3.33 1.78 1.18 2.35 3.78
June.......................... -- 3.36 2.12 1.01 2.20 3.58
July.......................... -- 3.64 2.10 1.12 1.96 3.62
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 32/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The index for approximately 32.02% Mortgage Loans in Loan Group 2 will
be the arithmetic mean of the London interbank offered rate quotations for
one-year U.S. Dollar-denominated deposits, as published in The Wall Street
Journal and most recently available either (i) as of the first business day in
the month preceding the month of the applicable Adjustment Date or (ii) up to
forty-five days before the applicable Adjustment Date ("ONE-YEAR LIBOR" and
together with One-Year CMT, an "INDEX"). In the event One-Year LIBOR is no
longer available, the Servicer will select a substitute index in accordance with
the terms of the related mortgage note in compliance with federal and state law.
YEAR
---------------------------------------
MONTH 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
------------------------------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
January....................... 4.85% 3.11% 1.48% 1.46% 2.40% 5.94%
February...................... 4.95 3.27 1.47 1.46 2.57 5.11
March......................... 5.12 3.57 1.37 1.38 2.48 4.91
April......................... 5.29 3.81 1.34 1.27 3.06 4.58
May........................... 5.38 3.71 1.82 1.29 2.64 4.44
June.......................... 5.51 3.76 2.11 1.25 2.60 4.17
July.......................... -- 3.90 2.39 1.16 2.27 4.19
August........................ -- 4.22 2.35 1.44 1.97 3.80
September..................... -- 4.13 2.26 1.45 1.92 3.59
October....................... -- 4.48 2.49 1.24 1.66 2.68
November...................... -- 4.72 2.54 1.48 1.62 2.29
December...................... -- 4.82 2.96 1.60 1.73 2.34
S-27
THE ORIGINATOR
All of the Mortgage Loans were originated by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
("WELLS FARGO BANK" and in such capacity, the "ORIGINATOR").
From and including 1996 and through 2005, Wells Fargo Bank and its
affiliates and predecessors originated or acquired a total of $2.063 trillion of
residential mortgage loans, which include the types of mortgage loans listed
above as well as other types of residential mortgage loans originated or
acquired by Wells Fargo Bank and its affiliates and predecessors. The table
below sets forth for each of the periods indicated the number and aggregate
original principal balance of mortgage loans originated or acquired by Wells
Fargo Bank (other than any mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and
Federal Home Loan Banks or mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by the
Government National Mortgage Association, Federal Housing Administration or
Department of Veterans Affairs) for each of the different "asset types" set
forth in the table below:
S-28
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 34/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
telephone numbers that can be called from anywhere in the United States. Wells
Fargo Bank also provides information and accepts applications through the
internet.
The following are Wells Fargo Bank's primary sources of mortgage loan
originations: (i) direct contact with prospective borrowers (including borrowers
with mortgage loans currently serviced by Wells Fargo Bank or borrowers referred
by borrowers with mortgage loans currently serviced by Wells Fargo Bank), (ii)
referrals from realtors, other real estate professionals and prospective
borrowers, (iii) referrals from selected corporate clients, (iv) referrals from
or originations by Wells Fargo Bank's Private Mortgage Banking division
(including referrals from the private banking group of Wells Fargo Bank and
other affiliated banks), which specializes in providing services to individuals
meeting certain earnings, liquidity or net worth parameters, (v) referrals from
or originations by several joint ventures into which Wells Fargo Bank, through
its wholly owned subsidiary, Wells Fargo Ventures, LLC, has entered with
realtors and banking institutions (the "JOINT VENTURES") and (vi) referrals from
mortgage brokers and similar entities. In addition to its own mortgage loan
originations, Wells Fargo Bank acquires qualifying mortgage loans from other
unaffiliated originators ("CORRESPONDENTS"). See "--Acquisition of Mortgage
Loans from Correspondents" below. The relative contribution of each of these
sources to Wells Fargo Bank's origination business, measured by the volume of
loans generated, tends to fluctuate over time.
Wells Fargo Ventures, LLC owns at least a 50% interest in each of the
Joint Ventures, with the remaining ownership interest in each being owned by a
realtor or a banking institution having significant contact with potential
borrowers. Mortgage loans that are originated by Joint Ventures in which Wells
Fargo Bank's partners are realtors are generally made to finance the acquisition
of properties marketed by such Joint Venture partners. Applications for mortgage
loans originated through Joint Ventures are generally taken by Joint Venture
employees and underwritten by Wells Fargo Bank in accordance with its standard
underwriting criteria. Such mortgage loans are then closed by the Joint Ventures
in their own names and subsequently purchased by Wells Fargo Bank or affiliates
of Wells Fargo Bank.
S-29
sponsored programs, the assistance extended by the employer need not necessarily
take the form of a loan subsidy. Not all relocation loans are generated by Wells
Fargo Bank through referrals from its corporate clients; some relocation loans
are generated as a result of referrals from mortgage brokers and similar
entities and others are generated through Wells Fargo Bank's acquisition of
mortgage loans from other originators. Also among Wells Fargo Bank's corporate
clients are various professional associations. These associations, as well as
the other corporate clients, promote the availability of a broad range of Wells
Fargo Bank mortgage products to their members or employees, including refinance
loans, second-home loans and investment-property loans.
The Depositor will purchase the Mortgage Loans from Bank of America,
National Association ("BANK OF AMERICA") as the Sponsor. All of the Mortgage
Loans were originated by the Originator. The underwriting standards used by the
Originator are intended to evaluate the Mortgagor's credit standing and
repayment ability and the value and adequacy of the mortgaged property as
collateral. The Mortgage Loans were generally underwritten in accordance with
the following standards. In certain instances, however, exceptions to the
following standards may have been granted by the Originator.
S-30
S-31
the applicant's payment history for the existing mortgage, communicating, either
verbally or in writing, with the applicant's present lender or analyzing
cancelled checks provided by the applicant. Verifications of income, assets or
mortgages may be waived under certain programs offered by Wells Fargo Bank, but
Wells Fargo Bank's underwriting guidelines require, in most instances, a verbal
or written verification of employment to be obtained. In some cases, employment
histories may be obtained through one of various employment verification
sources, including the borrower's employer, employer-sponsored web sites, or
third-party services specializing in employment verifications. In addition, the
loan applicant may be eligible for a loan approval process permitting reduced
documentation. The above referenced reduced documentation options and waivers
limit the amount of documentation required for an underwriting decision and have
the effect of increasing the relative importance of the credit report and the
appraisal. Documentation requirements vary based upon a number of factors,
including the purpose of the loan, the amount of the loan, the ratio of the loan
amount to the property value and the mortgage loan production source. Wells
Fargo Bank accepts alternative methods of verification, in those instances where
verifications are part of the underwriting decision; for example, salaried
income may be substantiated either by means of a form independently prepared and
signed by the applicant's employer or by means of the applicant's most recent
paystub and/or W-2. Loans underwritten using alternative verification methods
are considered by Wells Fargo Bank to have been underwritten with "full
documentation." In cases where two or more persons have jointly applied for a
mortgage loan, the gross incomes and expenses of all of the applicants,
including nonoccupant co-mortgagors, are combined and considered as a unit.
interest rate of the related loan, with the ratio being computed on the basis of
the proposed monthly mortgage payment. In the case of adjustable-rate mortgage
loans, the interest rate used to determine a mortgagor's total debt for purposes
of such ratio may, in certain cases, be the initial mortgage interest rate or
another interest rate, which, in either case, is lower than the sum of the index
rate that would have been applicable at origination plus the applicable margin.
In evaluating applications for subsidy loans and buy-down loans, the ratio is
determined by including in the applicant's total monthly debt the proposed
monthly mortgage payment reduced by the amount expected to be applied on a
monthly basis under the related subsidy agreement or buy-down agreement or, in
certain cases, the mortgage payment that would result from an interest rate
lower than the mortgage interest rate but higher than the effective rate to the
mortgagor as a result of the subsidy agreement or the buy-down agreement. In the
case of the mortgage loans of certain applicants referred by Wells Fargo Bank's
Private Mortgage Banking division, qualifying income may be based on an "asset
dissipation" approach under which future income is projected from the assumed
liquidation of a portion of the applicant's specified assets. In evaluating an
application with respect to a "non-owner-occupied" property, which Wells Fargo
Bank defines as a property leased to a third party by its owner (as distinct
from a "second home," which Wells Fargo Bank defines as an owner-occupied,
non-rental property that is not the owner's principal residence), Wells Fargo
Bank will include projected rental income net of certain mortgagor obligations
and other assumed expenses or loss from such property to be included in the
applicant's monthly gross income or total monthly debt in calculating the
foregoing ratio. A mortgage loan secured by a two- to four-family mortgaged
property is considered to be an owner-occupied property if the borrower occupies
one of the units; rental income on the other units is generally taken into
account in evaluating the borrower's ability to repay the mortgage loan. Wells
Fargo Bank permits debt-to-income ratios to exceed guidelines when the applicant
has documented compensating factors for exceeding ratio guidelines such as
documented excess funds in reserves after closing, a history of making a similar
sized monthly debt payment on a timely basis, substantial residual income after
monthly obligations are met, evidence that ratios will be reduced shortly after
closing when a financed property under contract for sale is sold, or additional
income has been verified for one or more applicants that is ineligible for
consideration as qualifying income.
S-32
one dollar for each dollar, if any, by which the value of the related mortgaged
property has increased over the prior year, as determined pursuant to a
statistically derived home price index. The payment obligations under both
primary and secondary financing are included in the computation of the
debt-to-income ratio, and the combined amount of primary and secondary loans
will be used to calculate the combined loan-to-value ratio. Wells Fargo Bank
does not restrict a borrower from obtaining secondary financing after
origination of the first lien mortgage loan.
COVERAGE PERCENTAGES
S-33
higher than the rate would have been had the loan-to-value ratios been 80% or
less or had primary mortgage insurance been obtained.
Wells Fargo Bank may also apply the retention program to its existing
borrowers who obtain new purchase money mortgage loans secured by primary
residences where the initial principal balance of the new loan would not exceed
150% of the original principal balance of the previous loan (up to a maximum new
loan amount of $400,000). Borrowers may be pre-approved under this program if
they have a satisfactory payment history with Wells Fargo Bank as well as a
satisfactory FICO Score. Wells Fargo Bank may waive verifications of borrower
income and assets under this program and may not impose any limitation on the
ratio of a borrower's current total debt obligation in relation to current
monthly income. A new appraisal will be obtained with respect to the residence
securing the new purchase money mortgage loan.
initiative.
THE SPONSOR
See "The Sponsor," "Mortgage Purchase Program "and "The Pooling and
Servicing Agreement" in the prospectus for more information about the Sponsor,
its securitization programs and its material roles and duties in this
securitization.
S-34
closing date if the applicable securitization closing date occurred less than
five years from the date of this prospectus supplement, or for each origination
year for the past five years. Each of the mortgage loan securitizations or
Originator portfolio identified on this website is unique, and the
characteristics of each securitized mortgage loan pool or Originator portfolio
varies from each other as well as from the mortgage loans to be included in the
Issuing Entity that will issue the Certificates offered by this prospectus
supplement. In addition, the performance information relating to the prior
securitizations or Originator portfolio described above may have been influenced
by factors beyond the Sponsor's or Originator's control, such as housing prices
and market interest rates. Therefore, the performance of these prior mortgage
loan securitizations or Originator portfolio is likely not to be indicative of
the future performance of the mortgage loans to be included in the Issuing
Entity. The Originator information referred to above was prepared solely by the
Originator.
THE DEPOSITOR
See "The Depositor," "Mortgage Purchase Program" and "The Pooling and
Servicing Agreement" in the prospectus for more information about the Depositor
and its material roles and duties in this securitization.
The issuing entity will be a New York common law trust (the "ISSUING
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 42/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
ENTITY"), formed on the Closing Date pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement. The Mortgage Loans will be deposited by the Depositor into the
Issuing Entity under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as described below
under "The Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Assignment of Mortgage Loans" and in
the prospectus under "The Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Assignment of
Mortgage Loans to the Trustee." The Issuing Entity will have no officers or
directors and no activities or continuing duties other than to hold the assets
underlying the Certificates and to issue the Certificates. The fiscal year end
of the Issuing Entity will be December 31 of each year.
Wells Fargo Bank (in its capacity as servicer, the "SERVICER") will
service all of the Mortgage Loans pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement.
S-35
The Servicer may perform any of its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through one or more subservicers. Despite the existence of
subservicing arrangements, the Servicer will be liable for its servicing duties
and obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as if the Servicer
alone were servicing the related Mortgage Loans. The duties of a "Master
Servicer" described in the prospectus will be performed by the Servicer in
accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
Servicing Experience
centers. As of the date hereof, Wells Fargo Bank has not failed to make any
required advance with respect to any issuance of residential mortgage backed
securities.
AS OF AS OF AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 2003 DECEMBER 31, 2004 DECEMBER 31, 2005
-------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE AGGREGATE
ORIGINAL ORIGINAL ORIGINAL
PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL
NO. OF BALANCE OF NO. OF BALANCE OF NO. OF BALANCE OF
ASSET TYPE LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS LOANS
--------------- ------- ---------------- ------- ---------------- ------- ----------------
FIRST LIEN
NON-CONFORMING,
NON-SUBPRIME
LOANS 472,694 $141,120,796,584 553,262 $171,086,652,776 635,091 $218,067,611,101
Servicing Experience
S-36
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 44/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
of repairs, the carrying costs during the repair period and the marketability of
the property both before and after the repairs.
Wells Fargo Bank's loan servicing software also tracks and maintains
tax and homeowners' insurance information and tax and insurance escrow
information. Expiration reports are generated periodically listing all policies
scheduled to expire. When policies lapse, a letter is automatically generated
and issued advising the borrower of such lapse and notifying the borrower that
Wells Fargo Bank will obtain lender-placed insurance at the borrower's expense.
S-37
In the event that Wells Fargo Bank is no longer the Servicer of the
Mortgage Loans or the senior, unsecured long-term debt of Wells Fargo & Company
is rated less than BBB- by Fitch, Wells Fargo Bank will deliver to the Trustee,
or a custodian for the Trustee, the original or certified copy of the Mortgage
with evidence of recording indicated thereon (except for any Mortgage not
returned from the public recording office, which will be delivered to the
Trustee or a custodian as soon as the same is available to Wells Fargo Bank) and
any intervening assignments.
Assignments of the Mortgage Loans to the Trustee (or its nominee) will
not be recorded except in states where recordation is required by the rating
agencies to obtain the initial ratings on the Certificates set forth in the
table on page S-6 in this prospectus supplement. In addition to the foregoing,
assignments of the Mortgage Loans will not be recorded (i) in states where, in
the opinion of counsel acceptable to the Securities Administrator and the
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 46/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Trustee, such recording is not required to protect the Trustee's interest in the
Mortgage Loans against the claim of any subsequent transferee of any successor
to or creditor of the Depositor or the originator of such Mortgage Loan, or (ii)
with respect to any Mortgage which has been recorded in the name of Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") or its designee. With respect to
any Mortgage which has been recorded in the name of MERS or its designee, no
mortgage assignment in favor of the Trustee will be required to be prepared or
delivered. Instead, the Servicers will be required to take all actions as are
necessary to cause the Trust to be shown as the owner of the related Mortgage
Loan on the records of MERS for purposes of the system of recording transfers of
beneficial ownership of mortgages maintained by MERS. The Trustee (or a
custodian on behalf of the Trustee) will promptly review each Mortgage File
after the Closing Date (or promptly after the Trustee's (or a custodian's)
receipt of any document permitted to be delivered after the Closing Date) to
determine if any of the foregoing documents is missing. If any portion of the
Mortgage File is not delivered to the Trustee, or a custodian on behalf of the
Trustee, and the Depositor does not cure such omission or defect within 90 days,
the Depositor will be required to repurchase the related Mortgage Loan (or any
property acquired in respect thereof) at the Purchase Price described below to
the extent such omission or defect materially and adversely affects the value of
such Mortgage Loan.
The Sponsor acquired the Mortgage Loans from the Originator pursuant
to a second amended and restated master seller's warranties and servicing
agreement, dated as of May 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the
S-38
"WELLS FARGO PURCHASE AGREEMENT"). Under the Wells Fargo Purchase Agreement, the
Originator made certain representations and warranties with respect to the
Mortgage Loans, as of the date of transfer of the Mortgage Loans to the Sponsor,
which will be assigned by the Sponsor to the Depositor, and by the Depositor to
the Trustee for the benefit of the certificateholders. To the extent that any
fact, condition or event with respect to a Mortgage Loan constitutes a breach of
any of these representations made by the Originator with respect thereto and
such breach materially and adversely affects the value of a Mortgage Loan or the
interest of the purchaser therein, the Originator will be obligated to cure such
breach. If the Originator does not cure such breach in accordance with the Wells
Fargo Purchase Agreement, the Originator will be required to either (i)
repurchase such Mortgage Loan (or any property acquired in respect thereof) at a
price (the "PURCHASE PRICE") equal to 100% of the unpaid principal balance of
such Mortgage Loan plus accrued and unpaid interest on such principal balance at
the related mortgage interest rate minus, so long as the entity repurchasing
such Mortgage Loan is the Servicer of such Mortgage Loan, the Servicing Fee Rate
or (ii) substitute an Eligible Substitute Mortgage Loan; however, such
substitution is permitted only within two years of the Closing Date. In
addition, in the case of the breach of the representation made by the Originator
that a Mortgage Loan complied with any applicable federal, state or local
predatory or abusive lending laws, the Originator will be required to pay any
costs or damages incurred by the Issuing Entity as a result of a violation of
such laws.
Under the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, the Sponsor will make to
the Depositor (and the Depositor will assign to the Trustee for the benefit of
certificateholders) certain limited representations and warranties as of the
Closing Date generally intended to address the accuracy of the mortgage loan
schedule and the payment and delinquency status of each Mortgage Loan acquired
by the Sponsor pursuant to Wells Fargo Purchase Agreement. In the event of a
breach of any such representation or warranty that does not constitute a breach
of any representation or warranty made by the Originator under the Wells Fargo
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 47/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
o have a Net Mortgage Rate not less than, and not more than 2%
greater than, that of the Deleted Mortgage Loan;
S-39
COMPENSATING INTEREST
When a mortgagor prepays a Mortgage Loan in full between due dates for
the Mortgage Loan, the mortgagor pays interest on the amount prepaid only to the
date of prepayment instead of for the entire month. Also, when a partial
prepayment is made on a Mortgage Loan together with the scheduled monthly
payment for a month on or after the related due date, the Stated Principal
Balance of the Mortgage Loan is reduced by the amount of the partial prepayment
as of that due date, but the principal is not distributed to the related
certificateholders until the Distribution Date in the next month; therefore, one
month of interest shortfall accrues on the amount of such partial prepayment.
S-40
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 49/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
ADVANCES
OPTIONAL TERMINATION
Servicing Agreement continue beyond the later of (a) the repurchase described
above, (b) the expiration of 21 years from the death of the survivor of the
person named in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and (c) the final
distribution to certificateholders of amounts received in respect of the assets
of the Issuing Entity. The termination of the Issuing Entity will be effected in
a manner consistent with applicable federal income tax regulations and the REMIC
status of the Issuing Entity.
S-41
Under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Wells Fargo
Bank will be responsible for securities administration, which includes pool
performance calculations, distribution calculations and the preparation of
monthly distribution reports. As Securities Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank will
be responsible for the preparation and filing of all REMIC tax returns on behalf
of the Issuing Entity and the preparation and filing of monthly reports on Form
10-D, annual reports on Form 10-K and certain current reports on Form 8-K that
are required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf
of the Issuing Entity. Wells Fargo Bank has been engaged in the business of
securities administration since June 30, 1995. As of March 31, 2006, Wells Fargo
Bank was acting as securities administrator with respect to more than
$829,726,924,092 of outstanding residential mortgage-backed securities.
Wells Fargo Bank serves or has served within the past two years as
loan file custodian for various mortgage loans owned by the Sponsor or an
affiliate of the Sponsor and anticipates that one or more of those mortgage
loans may be included in the Issuing Entity. The terms of any custodial
agreement under which those services are provided by Wells Fargo Bank are
customary for the mortgage-backed securitization industry and provide for the
delivery, receipt, review and safekeeping of mortgage loan files.
THE TRUSTEE
across the nation, inside and outside its 24-state footprint, provides a
comprehensive line of banking, brokerage, insurance, investment, mortgage, trust
and payment services products to consumers, businesses, governments and
institutions.
U.S. Bank has one of the largest corporate trust businesses in the
country with offices in 31 U.S. cities. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will
be administered from U.S. Bank's corporate trust office located at 209 South
LaSalle Street, Suite 300, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
On December 30, 2005, U.S. Bank purchased the corporate trust and
structured finance trust services businesses of Wachovia Corporation. Following
the closing of the acquisition, the Wachovia affiliate named as fiduciary or
agent, as applicable, under each client agreement will continue in that role
until U.S. Bank succeeds to that role in accordance with the terms of the
governing instrument or agreement and applicable law.
As of March 31, 2006, U.S. Bank (and its affiliate U.S. Bank Trust
National Association) was acting as trustee on 619 issuances of prime
mortgage-backed securities with an outstanding aggregate principal balance of
approximately $276,832,600,000.
S-42
The Trustee will hold the Mortgage Files in one of its custodial
vaults, which is located in Frederick, Maryland. The Mortgage Files are tracked
electronically to identify that they are held by the Trustee pursuant to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement. U.S. Bank National Association uses a barcode
tracking system to track the location of, and owner or secured party with
respect to, each file that it holds as custodian, including the Mortgage Files
held as Trustee. As of March 31, 2006, U.S. Bank National Association holds
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 52/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
approximately 4,185,000 document files for approximately 448 entities and has
been acting as a custodian for approximately 20 years. These figures do not
include files held in the former Wachovia sites. Such information will be
available upon completion of systems conversion, which is expected to occur in
September of 2006.
The Administrative Fees with respect to a Loan Group are payable out
of the interest payments received (and, in the case of the Securities
Administration Fee, advanced) on each Mortgage Loan in the related Loan Group.
The "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES" for a Loan Group consist of (a) a servicing fee
payable to the Servicer in respect of its servicing activities (the "SERVICING
FEE") and (b) a securities administration fee payable to the Securities
Administrator (the "SECURITIES ADMINISTRATION FEE"). The Administrative Fees for
a Loan Group will accrue on the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan
in the related Loan Group as of the due date in the month preceding the month of
the related Distribution Date at a rate (the "ADMINISTRATIVE FEE RATE") equal to
the sum of the Servicing Fee Rate and the Securities Administration Fee Rate.
The "SERVICING FEE RATE" with respect to each Mortgage Loan will be 0.2500% per
annum. The "SECURITIES ADMINISTRATION FEE RATE" with respect to each Mortgage
Loan will be 0.0035% per annum.
S-43
collections on the Mortgage Loans for any Advances previously made by it, as
described under "The Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Periodic Advances and
Servicing Advances" in the prospectus.
VOTING RIGHTS
The voting rights allocated to each class will be allocated among the
Certificates of such class based on their Percentage Interests.
DESCRIPTION OF CERTIFICATES
The "FINAL SCHEDULED MATURITY DATE" for the Offered Certificates will
be the Distribution Date in July 2036. The Final Scheduled Maturity Date
represents the Distribution Date in the month following the latest maturity date
of any Mortgage Loan. The actual final payment on your Certificates could occur
earlier or later than the Final Scheduled Maturity Date.
The Offered Certificates (other than the Class 1-A-R Certificate) will
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 54/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-44
ORIGINAL
CERTIFICATE MINIMUM INCREMENTAL
CLASS FORM DENOMINATION DENOMINATION
-------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ------------
DISTRIBUTIONS
The "POOL DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT" for each Loan Group with respect to any
Distribution Date, as more fully described in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, will be determined by reference to amounts received in connection
with the Mortgage Loans in such Loan Group, less certain reimbursable expenses
and indemnity payments pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and will
generally be equal to the sum of:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 55/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-45
PRIORITY OF DISTRIBUTIONS
INTEREST
The pass-through rate for each class of Offered Certificates for each
Distribution Date is as set forth or described in the table on page S-6 of this
prospectus supplement.
S-46
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 57/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The "GROUP SUBORDINATE AMOUNT" for any Distribution Date and any Loan
Group is equal to the excess of the Pool Principal Balance for such Loan Group
over the aggregate class balance of the Senior Certificates of the related Group
immediately prior to such date.
PRINCIPAL
On each Distribution Date, the Principal Amount for a Loan Group will
be distributed (i) as principal of the Senior Certificates of the related Group
in an amount up to the Senior Principal Distribution Amount for such Loan Group
and (ii) as principal of the Subordinate Certificates in an amount up to the
Subordinate Principal Distribution Amount for such Loan Group.
The "PRINCIPAL AMOUNT" for any Distribution Date and any Loan Group
will equal the sum of:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 58/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-47
(e) with respect to each Mortgage Loan in such Loan Group that became
a Liquidated Mortgage Loan during the calendar month preceding the month of that
Distribution Date, the amount of the Liquidation Proceeds (other than
Foreclosure Profits) allocable to principal received with respect to that
Mortgage Loan during the calendar month preceding the month of that Distribution
Date; and
first, to the Class 1-A-R Certificate, until its class balance has
been reduced to zero; and
The "SENIOR CREDIT SUPPORT DEPLETION DATE" is the date on which the
aggregate class balance of the Subordinate Certificates has been reduced to
zero.
The "SENIOR PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTION AMOUNT" for a Loan Group for any
Distribution Date will equal the sum of:
(a) the Senior Percentage for such Loan Group of the Scheduled
Principal Payments for that Distribution Date; and
(b) the Senior Prepayment Percentage for such Loan Group of the
Unscheduled Principal Payments for that Distribution Date.
S-48
The "POOL PRINCIPAL BALANCE" for a Loan Group with respect to any
Distribution Date equals the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage
Loans in such Loan Group outstanding on the due date in the month preceding the
month of such Distribution Date.
The "SENIOR PERCENTAGE" for a Loan Group for any Distribution Date
will equal (i) the sum of the aggregate class balance of the Senior Certificates
of the related Group immediately prior to such date, divided by (ii) the Pool
Principal Balance of the such Loan Group for such date.
SENIOR SUBORDINATE
LOAN GROUP PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
------------ ---------- -----------
Loan Group 1 95.4996% 4.5004%
Loan Group 2 95.4996% 4.5004%
Loan Group 3 95.4996% 4.5004%
The "SENIOR PREPAYMENT PERCENTAGE" for a Loan Group will be for any
Distribution Date occurring during the periods set forth below will be as
follows:
July 2015 through June 2016 the applicable Senior Percentage, plus 40% of
the applicable Subordinate Percentage;
July 2016 through June 2017 the applicable Senior Percentage, plus 20% of
the applicable Subordinate Percentage; and
July 2017 and thereafter the applicable Senior Percentage;
provided, however, (i) if on any Distribution Date the percentage equal to (x)
the sum of the aggregate class balances of the Senior Certificates divided by
(y) the aggregate Pool Principal Balance (such percentage the "TOTAL SENIOR
PERCENTAGE") exceeds such percentage as of the Closing Date, then the Senior
Prepayment Percentage for each Loan Group for such Distribution Date will equal
100%, (ii) if on any Distribution Date prior to the July 2009 Distribution Date,
prior to giving effect to any distributions, the percentage equal to the
aggregate class balance of the Subordinate Certificates divided by the aggregate
Pool Principal Balance (the "TOTAL SUBORDINATE PERCENTAGE") is greater than or
equal to twice such percentage calculated as of the Closing Date, then the
Senior Prepayment Percentage for each Loan Group for such Distribution Date will
equal the Senior Percentage for such Loan Group plus 50% of the Subordinate
Percentage for such Loan Group and (iii) if on any Distribution Date on or after
the July 2009 Distribution Date, prior to giving effect to any distributions,
the Total Subordinate Percentage is greater than or equal to twice such
percentage calculated as of the Closing Date, then the Senior Prepayment
Percentage for such Loan Group for such Distribution Date will equal the Senior
Percentage for such Loan Group.
S-49
PERCENTAGE OF
ORIGINAL SUBORDINATE
DISTRIBUTION DATE OCCURRING IN PRINCIPAL BALANCE
------------------------------ --------------------
July 2006 through June 2009 20%
July 2009 through June 2014 30%
July 2014 through June 2015 35%
July 2015 through June 2016 40%
July 2016 through June 2017 45%
July 2017 and thereafter 50%
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 61/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-50
(a) the Subordinate Percentage for such Loan Group of the Scheduled
Principal Payments for such Distribution Date; and
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 62/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(b) the Subordinate Prepayment Percentage for such Loan Group of the
Unscheduled Principal Payments for such Distribution Date.
The Class 1-A-R Certificate will remain outstanding for so long as the
Issuing Entity exists, whether or not it is receiving current distributions of
principal or interest. In addition to distributions of interest and principal as
described above, on each Distribution Date, the holder of the Class 1-A-R
Certificate will be entitled to receive any Pool Distribution Amount for a Loan
Group remaining after the payment of (i) interest and principal on the Senior
Certificates of the related Group and (ii) interest and principal on the
Subordinate Certificates, as described above. It is not anticipated that there
will be any significant amounts remaining for any such distribution.
CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION
S-51
ALLOCATION OF LOSSES
After the Senior Credit Support Depletion Date, the class balance of a
class of Super Senior Support Certificates will be reduced not only by the
principal portion of Realized Losses allocated to such class as provided in the
preceding paragraph but also by the principal portion of Realized Losses
allocated to the related class of Super Senior Certificates that are indicated
in the following table.
of a reduction in the value of the related mortgaged property, the amount of the
secured debt could be reduced to such value, and the holder of such Mortgage
Loan thus would become an unsecured creditor to the extent the then-outstanding
principal balance of such Mortgage Loan exceeds the value so assigned to the
mortgaged property by the bankruptcy court. In addition, certain other
modifications of the terms of a Mortgage Loan can result from a bankruptcy
proceeding, including the reduction (a "DEBT SERVICE REDUCTION") of the amount
of the Monthly Payment on the related Mortgage Loan. However, none of these
events will be considered a Debt Service Reduction or Deficient Valuation so
long as the Servicer is pursuing any other remedies that may be available with
respect to the related Mortgage Loan and (i) such Mortgage Loan is not in
default with respect to any
S-52
payment due thereunder or (ii) scheduled Monthly Payments are being advanced by
the Servicer without giving effect to any Debt Service Reduction.
With respect to any Distribution Date, the "ADJUSTED POOL AMOUNT" for
a Loan Group will equal the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the Mortgage
Loans in such Loan Group as of the Cut-off Date minus the sum of (i) all amounts
in respect of principal received in respect of the Mortgage Loans in such Loan
Group (including amounts received as Advances, principal prepayments and
Liquidation Proceeds in respect of principal) and distributed on the
Certificates on such Distribution Date and all prior Distribution Dates and (ii)
the principal portion of all Realized Losses (other than Debt Service
Reductions) incurred on the Mortgage Loans in such Loan Group from the Cut-off
Date through the end of the month preceding such Distribution Date.
S-53
In addition to the three conditions set forth above for the transferor
of a noneconomic residual interest to be presumed not to have knowledge that the
transferee would be unwilling or unable to pay taxes due on its share of the
taxable income of the REMIC, the REMIC Regulations contain a fourth condition
for the transferor to be presumed to lack such knowledge. This fourth condition
requires that one of the two following tests be satisfied:
with holding the noneconomic residual interest not exceed the sum of:
(b) (i) the transferee must be a domestic "C" corporation (other than
a corporation exempt from taxation or a regulated investment company or real
estate investment trust) that meets certain asset tests;
The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will not require that transfers of
the Class 1-A-R Certificate meet the fourth requirement above, and therefore
such transfers may not meet the safe harbor. The holder of the Class 1-A-R
Certificate is advised to consult its tax advisor regarding the advisability of
meeting the safe harbor.
S-54
THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT WILL PROVIDE THAT ANY ATTEMPTED OR
PURPORTED TRANSFER IN VIOLATION OF THESE TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS WILL BE NULL AND
VOID AND WILL VEST NO RIGHTS IN ANY PURPORTED TRANSFEREE.
Net Interest Shortfalls will adversely affect the yields on the Senior
Certificates and the Subordinate Certificates. In addition, losses generally
will be borne first by the Subordinate Certificates, as described in this
prospectus supplement under "Description of Certificates--Allocation of Losses."
The yields on the Offered Certificates will depend on the rate and timing of
Realized Losses on the applicable Mortgage Loans in the related Loan Group or
Loan Groups.
S-55
and warranties with respect to such Mortgage Loans. Any repurchases will shorten
the weighted average lives of the related classes of Offered Certificates.
S-56
mortgagor may be more likely to prepay the Mortgage Loan through refinancing or
otherwise. See "The Mortgage Pool" in this prospectus supplement. An increase in
the mortgage interest rate on a Relationship ARM will not be accompanied by an
increase in the Periodic Cap or the Rate Ceiling on such Mortgage Loan.
Therefore, the interest rate adjustments on Relationship ARMs may be more likely
to be subject to limitation by operation of such caps and ceiling than a
comparable loan which was originated with an initial mortgage interest rate
equal to the mortgage interest rate of the Relationship ARM plus the Incremental
Rate.
The tables set forth in Appendix B (the "DECREMENT TABLES") have been
prepared on the basis of the following assumptions (the "MODELING ASSUMPTIONS"):
(b) the initial class balances and pass-through rates for the Offered
Certificates are as set forth or described in the table on page S-6 of this
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 70/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
prospectus supplement;
(j) cash payments on the Certificates are received on the 20th day of
each month beginning in July 2006 in accordance with the priorities and amounts
described in this prospectus supplement under "Description of Certificates";
S-57
Appendix B.
The Decrement Tables set forth in Appendix B have been prepared on the
basis of the Modeling Assumptions described above under "--Assumptions Relating
to Tables." There will likely be discrepancies between the characteristics of
the actual Mortgage Loans included in each Loan Group and the characteristics of
the mortgage loans assumed in preparing the Decrement Tables. Any such
discrepancy may have an effect upon the percentages of initial class balances
outstanding set forth in the Decrement Tables (and the weighted average lives of
the Offered Certificates). In addition, to the extent that the Mortgage Loans
that actually are included in a Loan Group have characteristics that differ from
those assumed in preparing the Decrement Tables, the class balance of a class of
Offered Certificates could be reduced to zero earlier or later than indicated by
such Decrement Tables.
It is not likely that (i) all of the Mortgage Loans in a Loan Group
will have the interest rates or remaining terms to maturity assumed or (ii) the
Mortgage Loans in a Loan Group will prepay at the indicated percentage of CPR
until maturity. In addition, the diverse remaining terms to maturity of the
Mortgage Loans in a Loan Group (which include many recently originated Mortgage
Loans) could produce slower or faster reductions of the class balances than
indicated in the Decrement Tables at the various percentages of CPR specified.
the timing and amounts of prepayments and losses experienced with respect to the
Mortgage Loans.
If you own the Class 1-A-R Certificate, you should consult your tax
advisors regarding the effect of taxes and the receipt of any payments made in
connection with the purchase of the Class 1-A-R Certificate on your after-tax
rate of return. See "Federal Income Tax Consequences" in this prospectus
supplement and in the prospectus.
S-58
The weighted average life of, and the yield to maturity on, the
Subordinate Certificates, in increasing order of their numerical class
designation, will be progressively more sensitive to the rate and timing of
mortgagor defaults and the severity of ensuing losses on the Mortgage Loans. If
the actual rate and severity of losses on the Mortgage Loans is higher than
those you assumed, the actual yield to maturity of your Subordinate Certificate
may be lower than the yield you expected. The timing of losses on Mortgage Loans
will also affect your actual yield to maturity, even if the rate of defaults and
severity of losses over the life of the Issuing Entity are consistent with your
expectations. In general, the earlier a loss occurs, the greater the effect on
an investor's yield to maturity. The Realized Losses on the Mortgage Loans will
be allocated to reduce the class balance of the applicable class of Subordinate
Certificates (as described in this prospectus supplement under "Description of
Certificates--Allocation of Losses"), without the receipt of cash equal to the
reduction. In addition, shortfalls in cash available for distributions on the
Subordinate Certificates will result in a reduction in the class balance of the
class of Subordinate Certificates then outstanding with the highest numerical
class designation if and to the extent that the aggregate class balance of
Certificates, following all distributions and the allocation of Realized Losses
on a Distribution Date, exceeds the sum of the Adjusted Pool Amounts. As a
result of such reductions, less interest will accrue on that class of
Subordinate Certificates than otherwise would be the case. The yield to maturity
of the Subordinate Certificates will also be affected by the disproportionate
allocation of principal prepayments to the Senior Certificates, Net Interest
Shortfalls, other cash shortfalls in the Pool Distribution Amounts and
distribution of funds to the Senior Certificates of one or more
Undercollateralized Groups as a result of cross-collateralization otherwise
available for distribution on the Subordinate Certificates. See "Description of
Certificates--Allocation of Losses" and "--Cross-Collateralization" in this
prospectus supplement.
YIELD CONSIDERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE CLASS B-2 AND CLASS B-3 CERTIFICATES
S-59
B-3 Certificates are purchased on the Closing Date at assumed purchase prices
equal to 95.9375% and 93.3125%, in each case, of their class balance plus
accrued interest from June 1, 2006 to (but not including) the Closing Date.
reinvest funds received by them as distributions on the Class B-2 and Class B-3
Certificates. Consequently, these yields do not purport to reflect the total
return on any investment in the Class B-2 and Class B-3 Certificates when
reinvestment rates are considered.
CREDIT SUPPORT
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Depositor will apply the net proceeds of the sale of the Offered
Certificates against the purchase of the Mortgage Loans from the Sponsor.
S-60
Upon the issuance of the Offered Certificates, Hunton & Williams LLP
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 75/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
will deliver its opinion to the effect that, assuming compliance with the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for federal income tax purposes, each REMIC
elected by the Issuing Entity will qualify as a REMIC within the meaning of
Section 860D of the Code.
REGULAR CERTIFICATES
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATE
If you hold the Class 1-A-R Certificate, you must include the taxable
income of the Upper-Tier REMIC and any Lower-Tier REMIC in determining your
federal taxable income. Your resulting tax liability may exceed cash
distributions to you during certain periods. In addition, all or a portion of
the taxable income you recognize from the Class 1-A-R Certificate may be treated
as "excess inclusion" income, which, among other consequences, will result in
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 76/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
your inability to use net operating losses to offset such income from the
Upper-Tier REMIC and any
S-61
Lower-Tier REMIC. The Holder of the Class 1-A-R Certificate generally must
account separately for its interest in each REMIC and may not offset income from
one REMIC with losses from another REMIC.
All investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the federal,
state, local or foreign income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of the Offered Certificates.
STATE TAXES
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
S-62
mortgage loans such as the Mortgage Loans, but does not cover certain IRAs and
certain employee benefit plans covering only self-employed individuals which are
subject to the prohibited transaction provisions of the Code.
The Exemption may cover the acquisition and holding of the Offered
Certificates (other than the Class 1-A-R Certificate) by the Benefit Plans to
which it applies provided that all conditions of the Exemption other than those
within the control of the investors will be met. In addition, as of the date
hereof, there is no single mortgagor that is the obligor on 5% of the initial
balance of the Mortgage Pool.
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
S-63
Copies of these statements and reports will be filed on Form 10-D and
10-K, as applicable, with the Securities and Exchange Commission through its
EDGAR system located at http://www.sec.gov under the name of the Issuing Entity
for so long as the Issuing Entity is subject to the reporting requirement of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of and certain federal income tax matters relating to the
Offered Certificates will be passed upon for the Depositor and the Underwriter
by Hunton & Williams LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina.
CERTIFICATE RATINGS
S&P's and Fitch's ratings take into consideration the credit quality
of the Mortgage Pool, including any credit support, structural and legal aspects
associated with the Offered Certificates, and the extent to which the payment
stream of the Mortgage Pool is adequate to make payments required under the
Offered Certificates. S&P's and Fitch's ratings on the Offered Certificates do
not, however, constitute a statement regarding frequency of prepayments on the
Mortgage Loans.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 80/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
S-64
In addition, S&P and Fitch will monitor the initial ratings of the
Offered Certificates for so long as the Offered Certificates remain outstanding.
S-65
S-66
REMIC.................................................................... S-15
REMIC Regulations........................................................ S-53
Remittance Date.......................................................... S-40
REO Property............................................................. S-41
Residual Certificate..................................................... S-8
S&P...................................................................... S-64
Scheduled Principal Payments............................................. S-48
SDA...................................................................... S-59
Securities Administration Fee............................................ S-43
Securities Administration Fee Rate....................................... S-43
Securities Administrator................................................. S-41
Senior Certificates...................................................... S-8
Senior Credit Support Depletion Date..................................... S-48
Senior Percentage........................................................ S-49
Senior Prepayment Percentage............................................. S-49
Senior Principal Distribution Amount..................................... S-48
Servicer................................................................. S-35
Servicer Custodial Account............................................... S-40
Servicing Fee............................................................ S-43
Servicing Fee Rate....................................................... S-43
Similar Law.............................................................. S-62
SMMEA.................................................................... S-16
Stated Principal Balance................................................. S-48
Subordinate Certificates................................................. S-8
Subordinate Percentage................................................... S-49
Subordinate Prepayment Percentage........................................ S-50
Subordinate Principal Distribution Amount................................ S-51
Substitution Adjustment Amount........................................... S-39
Super Senior Certificates................................................ S-8
Super Senior Support Certificates........................................ S-8
Total Senior Percentage.................................................. S-49
Total Subordinate Percentage............................................. S-49
Trustee.................................................................. S-42
U.S. Person.............................................................. S-55
Undercollateralized Amount............................................... S-51
Undercollateralized Group................................................ S-51
Underwriter.............................................................. S-64
Unscheduled Principal Payments........................................... S-48
Upper-Tier REMIC......................................................... S-15
VRU...................................................................... S-37
Wells Fargo Bank......................................................... S-28
Wells Fargo Purchase Agreement........................................... S-39
S-67
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 83/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
APPENDIX A
A-1
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 84/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
LOAN GROUP 1
A-2
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, no more than approximately 2.47% of the Group 1
Mortgage Loans are expected to be secured by mortgaged properties in any
one five-digit postal zip code.
A-3
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the average outstanding principal balance of the
Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately $1,054,547.
A-4
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 86/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
25.01 - 30.00 3 4,020,000.00 1.77 1,340,000.00 693 28.53
30.01 - 35.00 1 2,000,000.00 0.88 2,000,000.00 704 31.50
35.01 - 40.00 5 7,900,000.00 3.48 1,580,000.00 707 38.02
40.01 - 45.00 6 7,494,891.83 3.31 1,249,148.64 722 41.91
45.01 - 50.00 6 9,834,000.00 4.34 1,639,000.00 736 47.81
50.01 - 55.00 7 8,787,000.00 3.88 1,255,285.71 688 53.15
55.01 - 60.00 9 16,570,000.00 7.31 1,841,111.11 722 57.77
60.01 - 65.00 21 31,727,234.43 13.99 1,510,820.69 734 63.56
65.01 - 70.00 31 40,401,239.14 17.82 1,303,265.78 742 68.64
70.01 - 75.00 32 36,217,077.77 15.97 1,131,783.68 733 74.23
75.01 - 80.00 91 58,245,180.75 25.69 640,056.93 722 79.45
85.01 - 90.00 1 609,579.43 0.27 609,579.43 669 90.00
90.01 - 95.00 1 422,000.00 0.19 422,000.00 748 95.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: 215 $226,727,695.54 100.00% $1,054,547.42 727 65.91%
=========================================================================================================================
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average current Mortgage Interest Rate
of the Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 5.428% per
annum.
A-5
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Gross Margin of the Group 1
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2.750% per annum.
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Rate Ceiling of the Group 1
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximate per annum.
A-6
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average number of months to the first
rate Adjustment Date for the Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be
approximately 56 months.
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average remaining term to stated
maturity of the Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 355
months.
A-7
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 88/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) The scores shown are Bureau Credit Scores from Experian (FICO), Equifax
(Beacon) and TransUnion (Empirica).
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average original Debt-to-Income Ratio
of the Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 35.18%.
A-8
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 89/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average months since origination of
the Group 1 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 5 months.
A-9
LOAN GROUP 2
A-10
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 90/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
AGGREGATE % OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 STATED STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
GEOGRAPHIC AREA LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, no more than approximately 2.97% of the Group 2
Mortgage Loans are expected to be secured by mortgaged properties in any
one five-digit postal zip code.
A-11
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
CURRENT MORTGAGE LOAN MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
PRINCIPAL BALANCES ($) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the average outstanding principal balance of the
Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately $650,461.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 91/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
A-12
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL LOAN-TO-VALUE MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATIOS (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
CURRENT MORTGAGE INTEREST MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATES (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average current Mortgage Interest Rate
of the Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 6.129% per
annum.
A-13
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
GROSS MARGIN (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 92/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Gross Margin of the Group 2
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2.590% per annum.
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATE CEILINGS (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Rate Ceiling of the Group 2
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 11.129% per annum.
A-14
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
FIRST RATE MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
ADJUSTMENT DATE LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average number of months to the first
rate Adjustment Date for the Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be
approximately 59 months.
% OF GROUP 2 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 2 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
REMAINING TERM (MONTHS) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 93/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average remaining term to stated
maturity of the Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 359
months.
A-15
(1) The scores shown are Bureau Credit Scores from Experian (FICO), Equifax
(Beacon) and TransUnion (Empirica).
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average original Debt-to-Income Ratio
of the Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 38.34%.
A-16
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average months since origination of
the Group 2 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2 months.
A-17
LOAN GROUP 3
% OF GROUP 3 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 3 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
OCCUPANCY LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF GROUP 3 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 3 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
PROPERTY TYPE LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF GROUP 3 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 3 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
PURPOSE LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-18
% OF GROUP 3 WEIGHTED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
GROUP 3 CUT-OFF DATE STATED STATED PRINCIPAL AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
GEOGRAPHIC AREA LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, no more than approximately 1.77% of the Group 3
Mortgage Loans are expected to be secured by mortgaged properties in any one
five-digit postal zip code.
A-19
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 96/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
850,000.01 - 900,000.00 2 1,735,000.00 1.53 867,500.00 681 66.11
900,000.01 - 950,000.00 2 1,892,600.00 1.67 946,300.00 673 80.00
950,000.01 - 1,000,000.00 7 6,888,995.13 6.09 984,142.16 683 68.67
1,000,000.01 - 1,500,000.00 5 6,570,299.06 5.81 1,314,059.81 747 71.37
1,500,000.01 - 2,000,000.00 5 9,470,999.67 8.37 1,894,199.93 741 61.53
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: 196 $113,110,379.77 100.00% $ 577,093.77 713 73.15%
=========================================================================================================================
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the average outstanding principal balance of the
Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately $577,094.
A-20
A-21
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average current Mortgage Interest Rate
of the Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 6.230% per
annum.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 97/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Gross Margin of the Group 3
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2.748% per annum.
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Rate Ceiling of the Group 3
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 11.230% per annum.
A-22
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average number of months to the first
rate Adjustment Date for the Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be
approximately 83 months.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 98/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average remaining term to stated
maturity of the Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 359
months.
(1) The scores shown are Bureau Credit Scores from Experian (FICO), Equifax
(Beacon) and TransUnion (Empirica).
A-23
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Original Debt-to-Income Ratio
of the Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 37.98%.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 99/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL BALANCE AS OF CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
MONTHS SINCE ORIGINATION LOANS BALANCE BALANCE CUT-OFF DATE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average months since origination of
the Group 3 Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2 months.
A-24
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
OCCUPANCY LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
PROPERTY TYPE LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
PURPOSE LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 100/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
A-25
% OF AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
AGGREGATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF CUT-OFF DATE STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE STATED PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
GEOGRAPHIC AREA LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, no more than approximately 1.51% of the Mortgage
Loans are expected to be secured by mortgaged properties in any one
five-digit postal zip code.
A-26
(1) As of the Cut-Off Date, the average outstanding principal balance of the
Group Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately $746,741.
A-27
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL LOAN-TO-VALUE MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATIOS (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-28
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
CURRENT MORTGAGE INTEREST MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATES (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 102/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
4.501 - 4.750 3 3,060,308.27 0.54 1,020,102.76 734 72.81
4.751 - 5.000 23 21,467,442.71 3.82 933,367.07 717 57.99
5.001 - 5.250 33 31,597,838.03 5.62 957,510.24 727 67.33
5.251 - 5.500 109 111,309,941.26 19.80 1,021,192.12 726 68.46
5.501 - 5.750 103 94,832,284.05 16.87 920,701.79 723 67.36
5.751 - 6.000 109 69,198,111.89 12.31 634,845.06 724 73.91
6.001 - 6.250 160 95,283,020.42 16.95 595,518.88 709 74.11
6.251 - 6.500 164 109,371,539.27 19.45 666,899.63 709 72.52
6.501 - 6.750 38 20,028,276.01 3.56 527,059.90 701 71.11
6.751 - 7.000 6 2,778,925.04 0.49 463,154.17 679 79.55
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: 753 $562,295,597.03 100.00% $ 746,740.50 718 70.39%
======================================================================================================================
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average current Mortgage Interest Rate
of the Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 5.867% per annum.
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED CUT-OFF AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
GROSS MARGIN (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-Off Date, the weighted average Gross Margin of the Group
Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 2.686% per annum.
A-29
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average Rate Ceiling of the Mortgage
Loans is expected to be approximately 10.867% per annum.
A-30
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 103/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average number of months to the first
rate Adjustment Date for the Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately
62 months.
A-31
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED AVERAGE AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CUT-OFF PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
REMAINING TERM (MONTHS) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average remaining term to stated
maturity of the Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 357 months.
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED AVERAGE AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CUT-OFF PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
CREDIT SCORES LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The scores shown are Bureau Credit Scores from Experian (FICO), Equifax
(Beacon) and TransUnion (Empirica).
A-32
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED AVERAGE AVERAGE ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL DEBT-TO-INCOME MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CUT-OFF PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
RATIOS (%) LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average original Debt-to-Income Ratio
of the Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 36.99%.
% OF
AGGREGATE AGGREGATE WEIGHTED
CUT-OFF DATE CUT-OFF DATE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF STATED STATED AVERAGE AVERAGE ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL CUT-OFF PRINCIPAL CREDIT LOAN-TO-VALUE
MONTHS SINCE ORIGINATION LOANS BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE SCORE RATIO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) As of the Cut-off Date, the weighted average months since origination of
the Mortgage Loans is expected to be approximately 4 months.
A-33
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 105/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
APPENDIX B
DECREMENT TABLES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 106/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
B-1
----------
(1) The weighted average life of a class of Certificates is determined by (i)
multiplying the amount of each distribution in reduction of the class
balance by the number of years from the date of the issuance of such class
to the related Distribution Date, (ii) adding the results and (iii)
dividing the sum by the initial class balance.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 107/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
B-2
CLASS 1-A-R
----------------------------------------------
0% 10% 20% 25% 30% 40% 50%
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Distribution Date
----------
(1) The weighted average life of a class of Certificates is determined by (i)
multiplying the amount of each distribution in reduction of the class
balance by the number of years from the date of the issuance of such class
to the related Distribution Date, (ii) adding the results and (iii)
dividing the sum by the initial class balance.
B-3
Initial Percentage ........... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
June 20, 2007 ................ 100 89 79 74 69 58 48
June 20, 2008 ................ 100 80 62 54 46 34 23
June 20, 2009 ................ 100 71 49 40 32 19 11
June 20, 2010 ................ 100 64 39 30 22 12 5
June 20, 2011 ................ 99 57 31 22 16 7 3
June 20, 2012 ................ 98 50 25 17 11 4 1
June 20, 2013 ................ 97 44 19 12 7 2 1
June 20, 2014 ................ 96 39 15 9 5 1 *
June 20, 2015 ................ 95 35 12 7 4 1 *
June 20, 2016 ................ 94 31 10 5 2 1 *
June 20, 2017 ................ 92 27 7 4 2 * *
June 20, 2018 ................ 90 24 6 3 1 * *
June 20, 2019 ................ 87 21 5 2 1 * *
June 20, 2020 ................ 85 18 4 1 1 * *
June 20, 2021 ................ 82 16 3 1 * * *
June 20, 2022 ................ 79 14 2 1 * * *
June 20, 2023 ................ 76 12 2 1 * * *
June 20, 2024 ................ 72 10 1 * * * *
June 20, 2025 ................ 68 9 1 * * * *
June 20, 2026 ................ 64 7 1 * * * *
June 20, 2027 ................ 60 6 1 * * * *
June 20, 2028 ................ 55 5 * * * * *
June 20, 2029 ................ 50 4 * * * * *
June 20, 2030 ................ 44 3 * * * * *
June 20, 2031 ................ 38 3 * * * * *
June 20, 2032 ................ 31 2 * * * * *
June 20, 2033 ................ 24 1 * * * * *
June 20, 2034 ................ 16 1 * * * * *
June 20, 2035 ................ 8 * * * * * *
June 20, 2036 ................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
----------
(1) The weighted average life of a class of Certificates is determined by (i)
multiplying the amount of each distribution in reduction of the class
balance by the number of years from the date of the issuance of such class
to the related Distribution Date, (ii) adding the results and (iii)
dividing the sum by the initial class balance.
B-4
Initial Percentage ........... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
June 20, 2007 ................ 100 89 79 74 69 58 48
June 20, 2008 ................ 100 80 62 54 47 34 23
June 20, 2009 ................ 100 71 49 40 32 19 11
June 20, 2010 ................ 100 64 39 30 22 12 5
June 20, 2011 ................ 100 57 31 22 16 7 3
June 20, 2012 ................ 99 51 25 17 11 4 1
June 20, 2013 ................ 99 45 20 13 8 3 1
June 20, 2014 ................ 98 40 16 9 5 1 *
June 20, 2015 ................ 97 36 12 7 4 1 *
June 20, 2016 ................ 95 32 10 5 3 1 *
June 20, 2017 ................ 93 28 8 4 2 * *
June 20, 2018 ................ 91 25 6 3 1 * *
June 20, 2019 ................ 89 22 5 2 1 * *
June 20, 2020 ................ 86 19 4 1 1 * *
June 20, 2021 ................ 83 16 3 1 * * *
June 20, 2022 ................ 80 14 2 1 * * *
June 20, 2023 ................ 77 12 2 1 * * *
June 20, 2024 ................ 74 11 1 * * * *
June 20, 2025 ................ 70 9 1 * * * *
June 20, 2026 ................ 66 8 1 * * * *
June 20, 2027 ................ 61 6 1 * * * *
June 20, 2028 ................ 56 5 * * * * *
June 20, 2029 ................ 51 4 * * * * *
June 20, 2030 ................ 45 3 * * * * *
June 20, 2031 ................ 39 3 * * * * *
June 20, 2032 ................ 32 2 * * * * *
June 20, 2033 ................ 25 1 * * * * *
June 20, 2034 ................ 17 1 * * * * *
June 20, 2035 ................ 8 * * * * * *
June 20, 2036 ................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
----------
(1) The weighted average life of a class of Certificates is determined by (i)
multiplying the amount of each distribution in reduction of the class
balance by the number of years from the date of the issuance of such class
to the related Distribution Date, (ii) adding the results and (iii)
dividing the sum by the initial class balance.
B-5
Initial Percentage ........... 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
June 20, 2007 ................ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
June 20, 2008 ................ 100 100 100 100 100 86 73
June 20, 2009 ................ 100 100 100 92 84 67 52
June 20, 2010 ................ 100 100 83 69 58 40 26
June 20, 2011 ................ 99 99 66 51 41 24 13
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 110/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
----------
(1) The weighted average life of a class of Certificates is determined by (i)
multiplying the amount of each distribution in reduction of the class
balance by the number of years from the date of the issuance of such class
to the related Distribution Date, (ii) adding the results and (iii)
dividing the sum by the initial class balance.
B-6
APPENDIX C
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 111/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
C-1
CURRENT
CURRENT NET
UNPAID MORTGAGE MORTGAGE INITIAL PERIODIC
PRINCIPAL INTEREST INTEREST REMAINING PERIODIC RATE
BALANCE RATE RATE TERM AGE CAP CAP
GROUP ($) (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (%) (%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL MONTHS
INTEREST TO FIRST PAYMENT
GROSS RATE ONLY ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT
MARGIN CEILING TERM DATE FREQUENCY
GROUP (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) INDEX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-2
CURRENT
CURRENT NET
UNPAID MORTGAGE MORTGAGE INITIAL PERIODIC
PRINCIPAL INTEREST INTEREST REMAINING PERIODIC RATE
BALANCE RATE RATE TERM AGE CAP CAP
GROUP ($) (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (%) (%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL MONTHS
INTEREST TO FIRST PAYMENT
GROSS RATE ONLY ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT
MARGIN CEILING TERM DATE FREQUENCY
GROUP (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) INDEX
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 113/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
2 2.7500000000 11.1406049980 60 60 12 1YR CMT
2 2.7500000000 11.0000000000 120 55 12 1YR CMT
2 2.7500000000 11.6250000000 120 56 12 1YR CMT
2 2.7500000000 11.3240538287 120 58 12 1YR CMT
2 2.7500000000 11.1065271574 120 59 12 1YR CMT
2 2.7500000000 11.2589105157 120 60 12 1YR CMT
2 2.2500000000 10.7500000000 0 58 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 10.9587706048 0 59 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 11.3199177038 60 55 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 10.9956323977 60 56 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 11.2550419659 60 58 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 11.2832557023 60 59 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 11.2556566289 60 60 12 1YR LIBOR
2 2.2500000000 11.1561096323 120 57 12 1YR LIBOR
C-3
CURRENT
CURRENT NET
UNPAID MORTGAGE MORTGAGE INITIAL PERIODIC
PRINCIPAL INTEREST INTEREST REMAINING PERIODIC RATE
BALANCE RATE RATE TERM AGE CAP CAP
GROUP ($) (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (%) (%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORIGINAL MONTHS
INTEREST TO FIRST PAYMENT
GROSS RATE ONLY ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT
MARGIN CEILING TERM DATE FREQUENCY
GROUP (%) (%) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) (MONTHS) INDEX
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-4
APPENDIX D
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 114/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The following table sets forth the amount of Realized Losses that
would be incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loans, expressed as a percentage
of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loans as of the
Cut-off Date.
D-1
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 115/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
PROSPECTUS
----------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7 OF THIS
PROSPECTUS.
The certificates of each series will represent interests in the related issuing
entity only and will not be obligations of the depositor, the sponsor or any
other entity.
This prospectus may be used to offer and sell any series of certificates only if
accompanied by the prospectus supplement for that series. Please read both
documents carefully to understand the risks associated with these investments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 116/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
o will be sold to the related issuing entity by the depositor, who will have
in turn purchased the mortgage loans from the sponsor;
o may be entitled to the benefit of one or more of the other types of credit
support or derivative instruments described in this prospectus and in more
detail in the accompanying prospectus supplement; and
o will be paid only from the assets of the related issuing entity.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED THE CERTIFICATES OR DETERMINED THAT THIS PROSPECTUS IS
ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
----------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND THE
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.................................................... iii
SUMMARY OF TERMS......................................................... 1
RISK FACTORS............................................................. 7
Limited Source of Payments - No Recourse to Depositor, Sponsor, Master
Servicer or Trustee................................................... 7
Limited Liquidity for Certificates May Affect Your Ability to Resell
Certificates.......................................................... 7
Certain Certificates May Not Be Appropriate For Individual Investors.. 8
Credit Enhancement is Limited in Amount and Coverage ................. 8
The Ratings of Your Certificates May Be Lowered or Withdrawn Which May
Adversely Affect the Liquidity or Market Value of Your Certificates... 9
Real Estate Market Conditions May Affect Mortgage Loan Performance.... 9
Geographic Concentration May Increase Rates of Loss and Delinquency... 10
General Economic Conditions May Increase Risk of Loss................. 10
Collateral Securing Cooperative Loans May Diminish in Value.......... 10
Leaseholds May Be Subject to Default Risk on the Underlying Lease..... 11
Yields of Certificates Sensitive to Rate and Timing of Principal
Prepayment............................................................ 11
Timing of Prepayments on the Mortgage Loans May Result in Interest
Shortfalls on the Certificates........................................ 12
Exercise of Rights Under Special Servicing Agreements May Be Adverse
to Other Certificateholders........................................... 12
Special Powers of the FDIC in the Event of Insolvency of the Sponsor
Could Delay or Reduce Distributions on the Certificates............... 13
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 117/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 118/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Assignment of Mortgage Loans to the Trustee........................... 59
Representations and Warranties........................................ 61
Special Servicing Agreements.......................................... 62
Payments on Mortgage Loans............................................ 62
Periodic Advances and Servicing Advances.............................. 65
Collection and Other Servicing Procedures............................. 66
Enforcement of "Due-on-Sale" Clauses; Realization Upon Defaulted
Mortgage Loans........................................................ 66
Insurance Policies.................................................... 68
Primary Mortgage Insurance............................................ 69
Recoveries Under Primary Mortgage Insurance Policies.................. 69
Fixed Retained Yield, Servicing Compensation and Payment of Expenses.. 70
Evidence as to Compliance............................................. 70
Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Sponsor and the Master
Servicer.............................................................. 71
Events of Default..................................................... 72
Rights Upon Event of Default.......................................... 72
Enforcement........................................................... 72
Amendment............................................................. 73
List of Certificateholders............................................ 73
Termination; Repurchase of Mortgage Loans and Mortgage Certificates... 74
The Trustee........................................................... 75
CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS.............................. 76
General............................................................... 76
Condominiums.......................................................... 76
Cooperatives.......................................................... 76
Foreclosure........................................................... 77
Rights of Redemption.................................................. 79
Anti-Deficiency Legislation, the Bankruptcy Code and Other Limitations
On Lenders............................................................ 79
Texas Home Equity Loans............................................... 81
"Due-on-Sale" Clauses................................................. 82
Applicability of Usury Laws........................................... 83
Forfeiture for Drug, RICO and Money Laundering Violations............. 83
Homeowners Protection Act of 1998..................................... 83
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and Similar Laws...................... 84
Environmental Considerations.......................................... 84
Enforceability of Certain Provisions.................................. 86
BENEFIT PLAN CONSIDERATIONS.............................................. 87
General............................................................... 87
Certain ERISA and Code Requirements................................... 87
ERISA Administrative Exemptions....................................... 88
Non-ERISA Plans and Exempt Plans...................................... 91
Unrelated Business Taxable Income--Residual Certificates.............. 91
LEGAL INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS.......................................... 92
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES.......................................... 93
Federal Income Tax Consequences for REMIC Certificates................ 94
Taxation of Regular Certificates...................................... 97
Taxation of Residual Certificates..................................... 103
Federal Income Tax Consequences for Certificates as to Which No REMIC
Election Is Made...................................................... 113
Federal Income Tax Consequences for Exchangeable Certificates......... 119
STATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS................................................. 121
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION..................................................... 121
USE OF PROCEEDS.......................................................... 122
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.................................................... 122
LEGAL MATTERS............................................................ 122
RATING................................................................... 123
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS............................................ 123
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE........................ 123
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION...................................... 123
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 119/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
ii
YOU SHOULD RELY ON THE INFORMATION IN THE PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT FOR THE TERMS OF
YOUR SERIES OF CERTIFICATES.
You should rely only on the information in this prospectus and the
accompanying prospectus supplement including the information incorporated by
reference. No one has been authorized to provide different information to you.
The certificates are not being offered in any state where the offer is not
permitted. The depositor does not claim the accuracy of the information in this
prospectus or the accompanying prospectus supplement as of any date other than
the dates stated on their covers.
You can find a listing of the pages where capitalized terms used in
this prospectus are defined under the caption "Index of Terms" beginning on page
125 of this prospectus.
iii
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF TERMS
RELEVANT PARTIES
ISSUING ENTITY
DEPOSITOR
SPONSOR
SERVICER(S)
MASTER SERVICER
TRUSTEE
Each trust will own the assets specified in the related prospectus
supplement. These assets will consist of any combination of the following items:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 121/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The related prospectus supplement will specify the cut-off date after
which the trust is entitled to receive collections on the mortgage loans and/or
mortgage certificates that it holds.
MORTGAGE LOANS
Each trust will own the related mortgage loans (other than the fixed
retained yield, which is the portion of the mortgage interest rate, if any, not
contained in the trust).
o fixed-rate loans;
o adjustable-rate loans;
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 122/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
o subsidy loans;
o balloon loans.
MORTGAGE CERTIFICATES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE CERTIFICATES
INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS
Interest will accrue at the pass-through rate for each class indicated
in the applicable prospectus supplement on its outstanding class balance or
notional amount.
PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTIONS
DISTRIBUTION DATES
RECORD DATES
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
SUBORDINATION
distributions on the
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, subordination does not provide full assurance that there will
be no losses on the senior certificates.
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
o fraud waiver; or
FORMS OF CERTIFICATES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPTIONAL TERMINATION
TAX STATUS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 126/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The treatment of the certificates for federal income tax purposes will
depend on:
If one or more REMIC elections are made, certificates that are regular
interests will be treated as newly issued debt instruments of the REMIC and must
be accounted for under an accrual method of accounting. Certificates that are
residual interests are not treated as debt instruments, but rather must be
treated according to the rules prescribed in the Internal Revenue Code for REMIC
residual interests, including restrictions on transfer and the reporting of net
income or loss of the REMIC, including the possibility of a holder of such
certificate having taxable income without a corresponding distribution of cash
to pay taxes currently due.
LEGAL INVESTMENT
RATING
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 127/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RISK FACTORS
Except for any related insurance policies and any reserve fund or
credit enhancement described in the applicable prospectus supplement:
As a result, you may not be able to sell your certificates or you may
not be able to sell your certificates at a high enough price to produce your
desired return on investment.
loans. Under certain circumstances, credit enhancement may be provided only for
one or more classes of certificates of a series.
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
o fraud waiver; or
THE RATINGS OF YOUR CERTIFICATES MAY BE LOWERED OR WITHDRAWN WHICH MAY ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE LIQUIDITY OR MARKET VALUE OF YOUR CERTIFICATES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 130/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
insured otherwise against earthquake damage or any other loss not covered by
standard insurance policies, as described under "The Pooling and Servicing
Agreement--Insurance Policies."
10
payment obligations arising under its blanket mortgage, the mortgagee holding
the blanket mortgage could foreclose on that mortgage and terminate all
subordinate proprietary leases and occupancy agreements. In addition, the
blanket mortgage on a cooperative may provide financing in the form of a
mortgage that does not fully amortize, with a significant portion of principal
being due in one lump sum at final maturity. The inability of the cooperative to
refinance this mortgage, and its consequent inability to make such final
payment, could lead to foreclosure by the mortgagee providing the financing. A
foreclosure in either event by the holder of the blanket mortgage could
eliminate or significantly diminish the value of the collateral securing the
cooperative loans.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 132/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
11
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 133/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 134/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
12
SPECIAL POWERS OF THE FDIC IN THE EVENT OF INSOLVENCY OF THE SPONSOR COULD DELAY
OR REDUCE DISTRIBUTIONS ON THE CERTIFICATES
13
Certain banking laws and regulations may apply not only to the sponsor
but to its subsidiaries as well. Arguments can also be made that the FDIC's
rights and powers extend to the depositor, the sponsor and the issuing entity
and that, as a consequence, the FDIC could repudiate or otherwise directly
affect the rights of the certificate holders under the transaction documents. If
the FDIC were to take this position, delays or reductions on payments to
certificate holders could occur.
Neither the United States Bankruptcy Code nor similar applicable state
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 136/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
laws prohibit the depositor from filing a voluntary application for relief under
these laws. However, the transactions contemplated by this prospectus and the
related prospectus supplement will be structured so that the voluntary or
involuntary application for relief under the bankruptcy laws by the depositor is
unlikely. The depositor is a separate, limited purpose subsidiary, the
certificate of incorporation of which contains limitations on the nature of the
depositor's business, including the ability to incur debt other than debt
associated with the transactions contemplated by this prospectus, and
restrictions on the ability of the depositor to commence voluntary or
involuntary cases or proceedings under bankruptcy laws without the prior
unanimous affirmative vote of all its directors (who are required to consider
the interests of the depositor's creditors, in addition to the depositor's
stockholders, in connection with the filing of a voluntary application for
relief under applicable insolvency laws). Further, the transfer of the mortgage
loans to the related trust will be structured so that the trustee has no
recourse to the depositor, other than for breaches of representations and
warranties about the mortgage loans.
14
BOOK-ENTRY SYSTEM FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF CERTIFICATES MAY DECREASE LIQUIDITY AND
DELAY PAYMENT
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 137/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
15
There are various federal and state laws, public policies and
principles of equity that protect consumers. Among other things, these laws,
policies and principles:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 139/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
16
GENERAL
The Trust Estate will not include the portion of interest on the
Mortgage Loans which constitutes the Fixed Retained Yield, if any. See "The
Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Fixed Retained Yield, Servicing Compensation
and Payment of Expenses."
GENERAL
The Mortgage Loans in a Trust Estate will have monthly payment dates
as set forth in the related prospectus supplement. The payment terms of the
Mortgage Loans to be included in a Trust Estate will be described in the related
prospectus supplement and will be one of the following types of mortgage loans:
17
these converted Mortgage Loans at the price set forth in the applicable
prospectus supplement. A Trust Estate containing fixed-rate Mortgage Loans
may contain convertible Mortgage Loans which have converted from an
adjustable interest rate prior to the formation of the Trust Estate and
which are subject to no further conversions.
payment of principal and interest sufficient to fully amortize the mortgage loan
over the remaining term based on a term of 15 years from the date of the first
scheduled payment on the mortgage loan (this option ceases to be available when
the mortgage loan has been paid to its 16th year), (iii) an interest only
payment that would cover solely the amount of interest that accrued during the
previous month (this option is only available if it would exceed the minimum
payment option for the month), or (iv) a minimum payment equal to either (a) the
initial monthly payment, (b) the monthly payment as of the most recent annual
adjustment date, or (c) the monthly payment as of the most recent automatic
adjustment, whichever is most recent. The minimum payment adjusts annually after
the first payment date but is subject to a payment cap which limits any increase
or decrease to no more than 7.5% of the previous year's minimum payment amount.
In addition, the minimum payment is subject to an automatic adjustment every
five years or if the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan exceeds
a certain percentage specified in the applicable prospectus supplement, in each
case without regard to the 7.5% limitation. On each annual adjustment date and
in the event of an automatic adjustment, the minimum monthly payment is adjusted
to an amount sufficient to fully amortize the mortgage loan based on the
then-current mortgage interest rate and remaining scheduled term of the loan,
unless, in the case of an annual adjustment, the monthly payment is restricted
by the 7.5% limitation, in which case the monthly payment is adjusted by 7.5%. A
minimum payment may not cover the amount of interest accrued during a month and
may not pay down any principal. Any interest not covered by a monthly payment
("DEFERRED INTEREST") will be added to the principal balance of the Mortgage
Loan. This is called "negative amortization" and results in an increase in the
amount of principal the borrower owes. Interest will then accrue on this new
larger principal balance. The index for an Option ARM Mortgage Loan will be
determined monthly or at other less frequent intervals specified in the
applicable prospectus supplement.
18
19
mortgagor fails to refinance its Subsidy Loan. In the event the mortgagor
refinances its Subsidy Loan, the new loan will not be included in the Trust
Estate. See "Prepayment and Yield Considerations." In the event a subsidy
agreement is terminated, the amount remaining in the Subsidy Account will be
returned to the employer, and the mortgagor will be obligated to make the full
amount of all remaining scheduled payments, if any. The mortgagor's reduced
monthly housing expense as a consequence of payments under a subsidy agreement
may be used by the originator in determining certain expense to income ratios
utilized in underwriting a Subsidy Loan.
except that, in the case of Mortgage Loans the proceeds of which were
used to refinance an existing mortgage loan, the appraised value of
the related mortgaged property is the appraised value determined in an
appraisal obtained at the time of refinancing; or
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 144/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
20
o the maximum and minimum interest rates on the Mortgage Loans; and
o townhouses;
o rowhouses;
21
o vacation homes;
o second homes;
o investment properties;
o manufactured housing.
MORTGAGE CERTIFICATES
22
GINNIE MAE
Section 306(g) of the Housing Act provides that "the full faith and
credit of the United States is pledged to the payment of all amounts which may
be required to be paid under any guaranty under this subsection." To meet its
obligations under its guaranties, Ginnie Mae is authorized, under Section 306(d)
of the Housing Act, to borrow from the United States Treasury with no
limitations as to amount.
and the Ginnie Mae II program ("GINNIE MAE II CERTIFICATES"). All mortgages
underlying a particular Ginnie Mae I Certificate must have the same annual
interest rate (except for pools of mortgages secured by mobile homes). The
annual interest rate on each Ginnie Mae I Certificate is one-half percentage
point less than the annual interest rate on the mortgage loans included in the
pool of mortgages backing the Ginnie Mae I Certificate. Mortgages underlying a
particular Ginnie Mae II Certificate may have annual interest rates that vary
from each other by up to one percentage point. The annual interest rate on each
Ginnie Mae II Certificate will be between one-half percentage point and one and
one-half percentage points less than the highest annual interest rate on the
mortgage loans included in the pool of mortgages backing the Ginnie Mae II
Certificate.
Ginnie Mae will have approved the issuance of each of the Ginnie Mae
Certificates in accordance with a guaranty agreement between Ginnie Mae and the
servicer of the mortgage loans underlying the Ginnie Mae Certificate. Pursuant
to this type of agreement, the servicer is required to advance its own funds to
make timely payments of all amounts due on the Ginnie Mae Certificate, even if
the payments received by the servicer on the mortgage loans backing the Ginnie
Mae Certificate are less than the amounts due on the Ginnie Mae Certificate. If
a servicer is unable to make payments on a Ginnie Mae Certificate as it becomes
due, it must promptly notify Ginnie Mae and request Ginnie Mae to make the
payment. Upon notification and request, Ginnie Mae will make the payments
directly to the registered holder of the Ginnie Mae Certificate. If no payment
is made by the servicer and the servicer fails to notify and request Ginnie Mae
to make the payment, the registered holder of the Ginnie Mae Certificate has
recourse only against Ginnie Mae to obtain the payment. The registered holder of
the Ginnie Mae
23
FREDDIE MAC
Under its Cash and Guarantor Programs, Freddie Mac guarantees to each
registered holder of a Freddie Mac Certificate the timely payment of interest at
the rate provided for by the Freddie Mac Certificate on the registered holder's
pro rata share of the unpaid principal balance outstanding of the related
mortgage loans, whether or not received. Freddie Mac also guarantees to each
registered holder of a Freddie Mac Certificate ultimate collection of all
principal of the related mortgage loans, without any offset or deduction, to the
extent of the holder's pro rata share thereof, but does not, except if specified
in the related prospectus supplement for a series of Certificates, guarantee the
timely payment of scheduled principal. Pursuant to its guarantees, Freddie Mac
indemnifies holders of Freddie Mac Certificates against any diminution in
principal by reason of charges for property repairs, maintenance and
foreclosure. Freddie Mac may remit the amount due on account of its guarantee of
ultimate collection of principal at any time after default on an underlying
mortgage loan, but not later than 30 days following (i) foreclosure sale, (ii)
payment of the claim by any mortgage insurer, or (iii) the expiration of any
right of redemption, whichever occurs later, but in any event no later than one
year after demand has been made upon the mortgagor for accelerated payment of
principal. In taking actions regarding the collection of principal after default
on the mortgage loans underlying Freddie Mac Certificates, including the timing
of demand for acceleration, Freddie Mac reserves the right to exercise its
servicing judgment with respect to the mortgages in the same manner as for
mortgages that it has purchased but not sold.
24
012, the range between the lowest and highest annual interest rates on the
mortgage loans does not exceed two percentage points.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 149/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
FANNIE MAE
PRIVATE CERTIFICATES
25
part of either the principal distributions (but not the interest distributions)
or the interest distributions (but not the principal distributions) or in some
portion of the principal and interest distributions (but not all of those
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 150/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The prospectus supplement for a series for which the Trust Estate
includes Private Certificates will specify (this disclosure may be on an
approximate basis and will be as of the date specified in the related prospectus
supplement) to the extent relevant and to the extent the information is
reasonably available to the Depositor and the Depositor reasonably believes the
information to be reliable:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 151/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
26
o the terms on which the underlying mortgage loans for the Private
Certificates may, or are required to, be purchased prior to their
stated maturity or the stated maturity of the Private
Certificates; and
DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT
The pooling and servicing agreement for a series may authorize the
Trustee to invest the funds in the Distribution Account in certain investments
that will qualify as "permitted investments" under Code Section 860G(a)(5) in
the case of REMIC Certificates. These eligible investments will generally mature
not later than the business day immediately preceding the next Distribution Date
for the series (or, in certain cases, on the Distribution Date). Eligible
investments include, among other investments, obligations of the United States
and certain of its agencies, federal funds, certificates of deposit, commercial
paper carrying the ratings specified in the related pooling and servicing
agreement of each rating agency rating the Certificates of that series that has
rated the commercial paper, demand and time deposits and banker's acceptances
sold by eligible commercial banks, certain repurchase agreements of United
States government securities and certain minimum reinvestment agreements.
Reinvestment earnings, if any, on funds in the Distribution Account generally
will belong to the Trustee.
DESCRIPTION OF CERTIFICATES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 152/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
27
GENERAL
o on a different basis;
in each case as specified in the related prospectus supplement. The timing and
amounts of distributions may vary among classes or over time as specified in the
related prospectus supplement.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 153/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
DEFINITIVE FORM
28
as they come due in the future and (c) intends to pay taxes associated with
holding the residual interest as they become due. The transferor must certify to
the Trustee that, as of the time of the transfer, it has no actual knowledge
that any of the statements made in the transferee affidavit are false and no
reason to know that the statements made by the transferee pursuant to clauses
(a), (b) and (c) of the preceding sentence are false. See "Federal Income Tax
Consequences--Federal Income Tax Consequences for REMIC Certificates--Taxation
of Residual Certificates----Tax--Related Restrictions on Transfer of Residual
Certificates."
BOOK-ENTRY FORM
29
DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the
State of New York, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing
corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a
"clearing agency" registered pursuant to Section 17A, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. DTC performs services for its Participants, some of
which (and/or their representatives) own DTC. In accordance with its normal
procedures, DTC is expected to record the positions held by each DTC Participant
in the Book-Entry Certificates, whether held for its own account or as a nominee
for another person. In general, beneficial ownership of Book-Entry Certificates
will be subject to the Rules, as in effect from time to time.
30
80 countries, including all major European countries, Canada and the United
States. Indirect access to Clearstream is available to other institutions which
clear through or maintain custodial relationship with an account holder of
Clearstream.
The Euroclear System was created in 1968 to hold securities for its
Participants and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear Participants
through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from
lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Transactions may be
settled in a variety of currencies, including United States dollars. Euroclear
provides various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and
interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the
arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described above. Euroclear is
operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (the "EUROCLEAR OPERATOR"). All operations
are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities clearance
accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator.
Euroclear plc establishes policy for Euroclear on behalf of Euroclear
Participants. Euroclear Participants include banks (including central banks),
securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries.
Indirect access to Euroclear is also available to other firms that clear through
or maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear Participant, either
directly or indirectly.
Because DTC can only act on behalf of DTC Participants, the ability of a
Beneficial Owner to pledge Book-Entry Certificates to persons or entities that
do not participate in the depository system, or otherwise take actions regarding
their Book-Entry Certificates, may be limited due to the lack of physical
certificates for their Book-Entry Certificates. In addition, issuance of the
Book-Entry Certificates in book-entry form may reduce the liquidity of the
Book-Entry Certificates in the secondary market since certain potential
investors may be unwilling to purchase Certificates for which they cannot obtain
physical certificates.
DTC has advised the Depositor that, unless and until Definitive
Certificates are issued, DTC will take any action the holders of the Book-Entry
Certificates are permitted to take under the pooling and servicing agreement
only at the direction of one or more DTC Participants to whose DTC accounts the
Book-Entry Certificates are credited, to the extent that these actions are taken
on behalf of Financial Intermediaries whose holdings include the Book-Entry
Certificates. Clearstream or the Euroclear Operator, as the case may be, will
take any other action permitted to be taken by a Certificateholder under the
pooling and servicing agreement on behalf of a Clearstream Participant or
Euroclear Participant only in accordance with its relevant rules and procedures
and subject to the ability of the Relevant Depositary to effect these actions on
its behalf through DTC. DTC may take actions, at the
31
32
Since the settlement is taking place during New York business hours,
DTC Participants can employ their usual procedures for sending Book-Entry
Certificates to the respective European Depositary for the benefit of
Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants. The sale proceeds will be
available to the DTC seller on the settlement date. Thus, to the DTC
Participants a cross-market transaction will settle no differently than a trade
between two DTC Participants.
33
(c) staggering the value dates for the buy and sell sides of the
trade so that the value date for the purchase from the DTC Participant
is at least one day prior to the value date for the sale to the
Clearstream Participant or Euroclear Participant.
DISTRIBUTIONS
INTEREST
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 161/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Interest will accrue on the class balance (or, in the case of Interest
Only Certificates, the notional amount) of each class of Certificates entitled
to interest at the pass-through rate (which may be a fixed rate or a rate
34
PRINCIPAL
35
PRINCIPAL TYPES
36
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 163/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
37
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 165/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
38
INTEREST TYPES
39
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES
40
See "Risk Factors--Amounts Received from the Auction and the Swap
Agreement May Be Insufficient to Assure Completion of the Auction" in this
prospectus.
41
42
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 170/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
43
(x) for any Mortgage Loan that became and REO Property during the
preceding calendar month, the loan number and Stated Principal Balance
of the Mortgage Loan as of the close of business on the Determination
Date preceding the Distribution Date and the date of acquisition
thereof;
(xi) the total number and principal balance of any REO Properties
(and market value, if available) as of the close of business on the
Determination Date preceding the Distribution Date;
44
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
GENERAL
o subordination;
o limited guarantee;
o letter of credit;
o reserve fund;
o cross-collateralization;
o overcollateralization;
o excess interest;
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 173/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
o fraud waiver; or
If losses occur which exceed the amount covered by credit enhancement or which
are not covered by the credit enhancement, certificateholders will bear their
allocable share of any deficiencies.
45
SUBORDINATION
LIMITED GUARANTEE
46
the payments made on the Mortgage Loans or principal payment rate on the
Mortgage Loans. A limited guarantee will be limited in amount to the dollar
amount or percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loans or
Certificates specified in the applicable prospectus supplement.
LETTER OF CREDIT
other credit support, such as losses arising from damage not covered by standard
hazard insurance policies, losses resulting from the bankruptcy of a borrower
and the application of certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, or losses
resulting from the denial of insurance coverage due to misrepresentations in
connection with the origination of a Mortgage Loan. The amount available under
the letter of credit will, in all cases, be reduced to the extent of the
unreimbursed payments previously paid. The obligations of the provider under the
letter of credit for each series of Certificates will expire at the earlier of
the date specified in the prospectus supplement or the termination of the Trust.
47
Servicer will generally not be required to expend its own funds to restore the
damaged property unless it determines that (a) restoration will increase the
proceeds to one or more classes of Certificates on liquidation of the Mortgage
Loan after reimbursement of the related Servicer for its expenses and (b) the
expenses will be recoverable by it through Liquidation Proceeds or insurance
proceeds.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 177/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
48
the sale of the Mortgaged Property. If the unpaid principal balance plus accrued
interest and certain Advances is paid by the special hazard insurer, the amount
of further coverage under the related special hazard insurance policy will be
reduced by that amount, less any net proceeds from the sale of the Mortgaged
Property. Any amount paid as the cost of repair of the property will further
reduce coverage by that amount. Restoration of the property with the proceeds
described under (i) above will satisfy the condition under any mortgage pool
insurance policy that the property be restored before a claim under the policy
may be validly presented with respect to the defaulted Mortgage Loan secured by
the related Mortgaged Property. The payment described under (ii) above will
render presentation of a claim relating to a Mortgage Loan under the related
mortgage pool insurance policy unnecessary. Therefore, so long as a mortgage
pool insurance policy remains in effect, the payment by the insurer under a
special hazard mortgage insurance policy of the cost of repair or of the unpaid
principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan plus accrued interest and certain
Advances will not affect the total insurance proceeds paid to
Certificateholders, but will affect the relative amounts of coverage remaining
under the related special hazard insurance policy and mortgage pool insurance
policy.
RESERVE FUND
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 178/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
49
CROSS-COLLATERALIZATION
OVERCOLLATERALIZATION
EXCESS INTEREST
contracts, swap agreements or interest rate cap or floor agreements (also called
yield maintenance agreements), each of which agreements is intended to reduce
the effects of interest rate fluctuations on the assets or on one or more
classes of Certificates (each, a "CASH FLOW AGREEMENT"). The applicable
prospectus supplement will describe the name, organizational form and general
character of the business of the counterparty under any Cash Flow Agreement. In
addition, the prospectus supplement for the related series of Certificates will
disclose whether the significance percentage is less than 10%, at least 10% but
less than 20%, or more than 20%, calculated in accordance with Item 1115 of
Regulation AB (17 C.F.R. Section 229.1115). To the extent this percentage is (a)
10% or more but less than 20%, the related prospectus supplement will provide
financial data required by Item 301 of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. Section
229.301) or (b) greater than 20%, the related prospectus supplement will provide
financial statements required by Item 1115(b)(2) of Regulation AB (17 C.F.R.
Section 229.1115) and, in either case, the related prospectus supplement will
contain a description of the operation and material terms of the Cash Flow
Agreement, including, without limitation, conditions to payment or limits on the
timing or amount of payments and material provisions relating to the termination
of the Cash Flow Agreement or the substitution of another Cash Flow Agreement
for the Cash Flow Agreement. Copies of the Cash Flow Agreement, if any, relating
to a series of Certificates will be filed with the Commission as an exhibit to a
Current Report on Form 8-K.
50
Rate on the notional amount from the counterparty, until the swap agreement is
terminated. Only the net amount of the two obligations will be paid by the
appropriate party. In the event that the Trust is required to make a payment to
the counterparty, that payment will be paid on the related Distribution Date
prior to distributions to Certificateholders. Generally, any payments received
from the counterparty by the Trust will be distributed to cover certain
shortfalls as set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement.
FRAUD WAIVER
51
exceeding the maximum rate in effect at the time the loan is made, as
established by HUD, and may not exceed specified percentages of the lesser of
the appraised value of the property and the sales price, less seller-paid
closing costs for the property, up to certain specified maximums. In addition,
the FHA imposes initial investment minimums and other requirements on mortgage
loans insured under the Section 203(b) and Section 234 programs.
at least annually.
52
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 182/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
53
in any Trust Estate under the limited conditions specified in the prospectus
supplement. For any series of Certificates for which an election has been made
to treat the Trust Estate (or one or more segregated pools of assets in the
Trust Estate) as a REMIC, any purchase or repurchase may be effected only
pursuant to a "qualified liquidation," as defined in Code Section 860F(a)(4)(A).
See "The Pooling and Servicing Agreement--Termination; Repurchase of Mortgage
Loans and Mortgage Certificates." Any purchase or repurchase of Mortgage Assets
will shorten the weighted average life of one or more classes of Certificates of
the related series.
THE SPONSOR
54
The table below sets forth the number and aggregate principal balance
of mortgage loans which have been included in Trusts formed by the Depositor,
which were originated or acquired by Bank of America during the periods
indicated:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 185/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
------------ -------------- -------------- ---------------
THE DEPOSITOR
The Depositor will have limited obligations and rights under each
pooling and servicing agreement after the closing date for any series,
including, but not limited to, repurchasing Mortgage Loans due to breaches of
representations and warranties.
55
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Depositor will use substantially all of the net proceeds received
from the sale of each series of Certificates either:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 186/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The Depositor will use any remaining proceeds for its general
corporate purposes.
56
THE SERVICERS
57
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 189/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
58
Agreement. In addition, the pooling and servicing agreement will provide that no
Servicer will be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any
legal action that is not incidental to its duties under the pooling and
servicing agreement and that in its opinion may involve it in any expense or
liability. A Servicer may, however, in its discretion, undertake any action
deemed by it necessary or desirable relating to the pooling and servicing
agreement and the rights and duties of the parties to the pooling and servicing
agreement and the interests of the Certificateholders. In this event, the legal
expenses and costs of the action and any liability resulting from it will be
expenses, costs and liabilities of the Trust and the Servicer will be entitled
to be reimbursed out of the Servicer Custodial Account, and any loss to the
Trust arising from this right of reimbursement will be allocated first to the
Subordinate Certificate of a series before being allocated to the related Senior
Certificates, or if the series does not contain Subordinate Certificates, pro
rata among the various classes of Certificates or in another manner specified in
the applicable prospectus supplement.
The Servicer also has the right to assign its rights and delegate its
duties and obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement for each
series; provided that, if the Servicer desires to be released from its
obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, (i) the purchaser or
transferee accepting the assignment or delegation is qualified to service
mortgage loans for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, (ii) the purchaser is satisfactory
to the Trustee for the series, in the reasonable exercise of its judgment, and
executes and delivers to the Trustee an agreement, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee, which contains an assumption by the
purchaser or transferee of the due and punctual performance and observance of
each covenant and condition to be performed or observed by the Servicer under
the pooling and servicing agreement from and after the date of the agreement,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 190/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
and (iii) each applicable Rating Agency's rating of any Certificates for the
series in effect immediately prior to the assignment, sale or transfer would not
be qualified, downgraded or withdrawn as a result of the assignment, sale or
transfer and the Certificates would not be placed on credit review status by any
Rating Agency. The Servicer will be released from its obligations under the
pooling and servicing agreement upon the assignment and delegation of its duties
and obligations, except that the Servicer will remain liable for all liabilities
and obligations incurred by it prior to the time that the conditions contained
in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) above are met.
59
exhibit to the pooling and servicing agreement. The schedule will include the
principal balance of each Mortgage Loan, the mortgage rate, the maturity of each
mortgage note and other information.
With respect to any Mortgage Loans that are cooperative loans, the
Depositor will generally be required to cause to be delivered to the Trustee;
60
found by the Trustee or custodian not to have been properly executed or received
or to be unrelated to the Mortgage Loans identified in the pooling and servicing
agreement, and any defect cannot be cured within the permitted time period, the
Sponsor or other party specified in the prospectus supplement will replace the
Mortgage Loan with an eligible substitute Mortgage Loan (as described in the
related prospectus supplement) or repurchase the related Mortgage Loan from the
Trustee at a price generally equal to the principal balance thereof, plus
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 192/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
accrued and unpaid interest thereon. Upon receipt of the repurchase price, in
the case of a repurchase, the Trustee will reimburse any unreimbursed Advances
of principal and interest by the Master Servicer with respect to that Mortgage
Loan or unreimbursed payments under any form of credit support. The remaining
portion of the repurchase price will then be passed through to holders of the
Certificates as liquidation proceeds in accordance with the procedures specified
under "Description of Certificates-- Distributions". This
substitution/repurchase obligation constitutes the sole remedy available to
Certificateholders or the Trustee for a defect in a mortgage loan document.
61
The pooling and servicing agreement may permit each Servicer to enter
into a special servicing agreement with an unaffiliated holder of a class of
Subordinate Certificates or of a class of securities representing interests in
one or more classes of Subordinate Certificates alone or together with other
subordinated mortgage pass-through certificates. Pursuant to a special servicing
agreement, this holder may instruct the Servicer to commence or delay
foreclosure proceedings with respect to delinquent Mortgage Loans. In the event
that there is a Master Servicer for a series, the pooling and servicing
agreement may permit the Master Servicer to enter into an agreement with those
holders which will allow the Master Servicer to instruct the Servicers, to the
extent provided in the applicable Underlying Servicing Agreements, to commence
or delay foreclosure proceedings with respect to delinquent Mortgage Loans.
62
63
64
(i) to pay itself the applicable trustee fee and to pay to the
owner thereof any Fixed Retained Yield;
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 197/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
The Trustee will cause any Paying Agent to execute and deliver to the
Trustee an instrument in which the Paying Agent agrees with the Trustee that the
Paying Agent will hold all amounts deposited with it by the Trustee for
distribution to Certificateholders in trust for the benefit of
Certificateholders until the amounts are distributed to Certificateholders or
otherwise disposed of as provided in the applicable pooling and servicing
agreement.
Advances by each Servicer will be made from its own funds or funds in
the applicable Servicer Custodial Account that do not constitute a portion of
the applicable available funds for that Distribution Date. The obligation to
make an Advance with respect to any Mortgage Loan will continue until the
ultimate disposition of the REO Property or Mortgaged Property relating to the
Mortgage Loan unless the Servicer determines, based on its estimation of the
value of the Mortgaged Property in relation to the sum of the unpaid principal
balance of the related Mortgage Loan, accrued interest, the amount of previously
unreimbursed Advances and anticipated disposition expenses, that the advance (a
"NONRECOVERABLE ADVANCE") would not ultimately be recoverable under any
applicable insurance policies, from proceeds of liquidation of the Mortgage Loan
or otherwise. An "REO PROPERTY" is a Mortgaged Property that has been acquired
by a Servicer on behalf of the Trust through foreclosure or grant of a deed in
lieu of foreclosure.
65
Property. In the case of Certificates of any series for which credit enhancement
is provided in the form of a mortgage pool insurance policy, the Depositor may
obtain an endorsement to the mortgage pool insurance policy which obligates the
pool insurer to advance delinquent payments of principal and interest. The pool
insurer would only be obligated under the endorsement to the extent the
mortgagor fails to make his or her payment and the Master Servicer or Trustee
fails to make a required advance.
With respect to each Mortgage Loan having a fixed interest rate, the
applicable Underlying Servicing Agreement or pooling and servicing agreement
will generally provide that, when any Mortgaged Property is about to be conveyed
by the mortgagor, the Servicer will, to the extent it has knowledge of the
prospective conveyance, exercise its rights to accelerate the maturity of the
Mortgage Loan under the "due-on-sale" clause in the Mortgage
66
67
deficiency. It is anticipated that in most cases the Servicer will not seek
deficiency judgments, and will not be required under the applicable Underlying
Servicing Agreement or the pooling and servicing agreement to seek deficiency
judgments. In lieu of foreclosure, each Servicer may arrange for the sale by the
borrower of the Mortgaged Property related to a defaulted Mortgage Loan to a
third party, rather than foreclosing upon and selling the Mortgaged Property.
INSURANCE POLICIES
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 201/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
68
69
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 203/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
incurred by the Servicer in connection with those proceedings and which are
reimbursable under the pooling and servicing agreement.
"FIXED RETAINED YIELD" for any Mortgage Loan is that portion, if any,
of interest at the mortgage interest rate that is not included in the related
Trust Estate and is retained by the Depositor or the Sponsor. The prospectus
supplement for a series will describe the Fixed Retained Yield, if any, relating
to the Mortgage Loans of the series. Any Fixed Retained Yield will be
established on a loan-by-loan basis and will be specified in the schedule of
Mortgage Loans attached as an exhibit to the applicable pooling and servicing
agreement. If the Sponsor or the Depositor retains Fixed Retained Yield, the
Sponsor, if it is the Servicer, may deduct the Fixed Retained Yield from
mortgagor payments as received and retain or remit the Fixed Retained Yield to
the Depositor, as the case may be. Otherwise, the Servicer will deposit the
Fixed Retained Yield in the Master Servicer Custodial Account or Distribution
Account, and the Master Servicer or the Trustee will withdraw and remit the
Fixed Retained Yield to the owner thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with
respect to any payment of interest received relating to a Mortgage Loan (whether
paid by the mortgagor or received as Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds or
otherwise) which is less than the full amount of interest then due with respect
to the Mortgage Loan, the owner of the Fixed Retained Yield for the Mortgage
Loan will bear a ratable share of the interest shortfall.
Each Servicer will pay all expenses incurred in connection with the
servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it underlying a series, including,
without limitation, payment of the Standard Hazard Insurance Policy premiums.
The Servicer will be entitled, in certain circumstances, to reimbursement from
the Servicer Custodial Account of Periodic Advances, of Servicing Advances made
by it to pay taxes, insurance premiums and similar items with respect to any
Mortgaged Property or for expenditures incurred by it in connection with the
restoration, foreclosure or liquidation of any Mortgaged Property (to the extent
of Liquidation Proceeds or insurance policy proceeds in respect of the related
Mortgaged Property) and of certain losses against which it is indemnified by the
Trust Estate as described above under "Servicing of the Mortgage Loans--The
Servicers."
EVIDENCE AS TO COMPLIANCE
Each Servicer and Master Servicer will deliver annually to the Trustee
or Master Servicer, as applicable, on or before the date specified in the
applicable pooling and servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement, an
officer's certificate stating that (i) a review of the Servicer's or Master
Servicer's activities during the preceding calendar year and of performance
under the applicable pooling and servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing
Agreement has been made under the supervision of the officer, and (ii) to the
best of the officer's knowledge, based on the review, the Servicer or Master
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable pooling and
servicing agreement or Underlying Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout the year, or, if there has
70
CERTAIN MATTERS REGARDING THE DEPOSITOR, THE SPONSOR AND THE MASTER SERVICER
The pooling and servicing agreement will also provide that none of the
Depositor, the Master Servicer or the Sponsor, or any directors, officers,
employees or agents of any of them will be under any liability to the Trust
Estate or certificateholders or the Trustee, any subservicer or others for any
action taken or not taken by any of those parties, any subservicer or the
Trustee in good faith pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, or for
errors in judgment. However, none of the Depositor, the Sponsor, the Master
Servicer or any of the parties described above will be protected against any
liability that otherwise would be imposed on one of those parties by reason of
willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of duties
or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties. The pooling
and servicing agreement will provide that each of the parties described above is
entitled to indemnification by the Trust Estate and will be held harmless
against any loss, liability or expense incurred in connection with any legal
action relating to the pooling and servicing agreement or the Certificates for a
series, other than any loss, liability or expense related to any specific
Mortgage Loan (except any loss, liability or expense otherwise reimbursable
pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement) and any loss, liability or
expense incurred by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence
in the performance of that party's duties or by reason of reckless disregard by
that party of its obligations and duties. In addition, the pooling and servicing
agreement will provide that none of the Depositor, the Sponsor or the Master
Servicer is under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal
action which is not incidental to, in the case of the Depositor, the Sponsor or
the Master Servicer, its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement and
which in its opinion may involve it in any expense or liability. Each of the
Depositor, the Sponsor and the Master Servicer may, however, in its discretion,
undertake any action that it deems necessary or desirable with respect to the
pooling and servicing agreement and the rights and duties of the parties to the
pooling and servicing agreement and the interests of
71
certificateholders. In that event, the legal expenses and costs of that action
and any liability resulting therefrom will be expenses, costs and liabilities of
the Trust Estate, and the Depositor, the Sponsor and the Master Servicer will be
entitled to be reimbursed from the Master Servicer Custodial Account or Servicer
Custodial Account, as applicable.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
ENFORCEMENT
72
to the Trustee written notice of default and the continuance thereof and unless
holders of Certificates evidencing not less than 25% of each class of
certificates affected thereby have made written requests to the Trustee to
institute a proceeding in its own name as Trustee and have offered and provided
to the Trustee reasonable indemnity and the Trustee for 60 days has neglected or
refused to institute the proceeding. However, the Trustee is under no obligation
to exercise any of the trusts or powers vested in it by the pooling and
servicing agreement for any series or to make any investigation of matters
arising under the pooling and servicing agreement or to institute, conduct or
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 207/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
defend any litigation under the pooling and servicing agreement at the request,
order or direction of any certificateholders, unless those certificateholders
have offered and provided to the Trustee reasonable security or indemnity
against the costs, expenses and liabilities which may be incurred.
AMENDMENT
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series may be amended by
the Depositor, the Sponsor (if a party thereto), the Master Servicer, the
Servicer and the Trustee, without notice to or the consent of any
certificateholder to, among other things:
provided that the amendment will not adversely affect in any material respect
the interests of any certificateholder of that series.
o reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of,
payments received on Mortgage Loans or distributions that are
required to be made in respect of any Certificate without the
consent of the holder of the Certificate; or
LIST OF CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 208/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
73
In no event, however, will the Trust Estate created by any pooling and servicing
agreement continue beyond the expiration of 21 years from the death of the
survivor of the persons named in the pooling and servicing agreement. For each
series of Certificates, the Trustee will give written notice of termination of
the pooling and servicing agreement to each Certificateholder, and the final
distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the
Certificates at an office or agency appointed by the Depositor and specified in
the notice of termination. The termination of the Trust is required to be
effected in a manner consistent with applicable federal income tax regulations
and the REMIC status of any REMIC.
The pooling and servicing agreement for each series may permit the
Master Servicer or any other entity specified in the related prospectus
supplement to repurchase, or permit or require the Trustee to auction, all or a
portion of the remaining Mortgage Loans or Mortgage Certificates and property
acquired in respect of a Mortgage Loan, at a purchase price generally equal to
the unpaid principal balance of the Mortgage Loans in the applicable group or
groups plus the fair market value of any related mortgaged properties acquired
upon foreclosure of the related Mortgage Loans, together with accrued and unpaid
interest at the applicable mortgage interest rate on the related Mortgage Loans.
However, if the pooling and servicing agreement for a series permits the
Depositor to exercise the purchase option, for so long as the Depositor is
subject to regulation by the OCC, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve or the OTS, the
Depositor may exercise its purchase option only if the aggregate fair market
value of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties is greater than or equal to the
purchase price described in the preceding sentence. The exercise of this right
will effect early retirement of the Certificates of that series, but the Master
Servicer's or other party's right so to repurchase is subject to the aggregate
principal balances of the Mortgage Loans at the time of repurchase being less
than the percentage of the aggregate initial principal amount of all
Certificates of that series at the Cut-off Date specified in the related
prospectus supplement.
included in the Trust Estate. This option will be exercisable, in the case of
holders of Residual Certificates, at the time and under the circumstances
specified in the related prospectus supplement. For this type of purchase to
take place, the Trustee must receive an opinion of counsel that the repurchase
and related distributions to certificateholders:
74
For each series, the Trustee will give written notice of termination
of the pooling and servicing agreement to each certificateholder, and the final
distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the
Certificates at an office or agency of the Trustee specified in the notice of
termination.
THE TRUSTEE
The Trustee may resign at any time, in which event the Master Servicer
or, if there is no Master Servicer, the Servicer(s) will be obligated to appoint
a successor trustee. The Master Servicer or, if there is no Master Servicer, the
Servicer(s) may also remove the Trustee if the Trustee ceases to be eligible to
act as Trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement, is incapable of acting
or if the Trustee becomes insolvent. Upon becoming aware of these circumstances,
the Master Servicer or, if there is no Master Servicer, the Servicer(s) will
become obligated to appoint a successor trustee. The Trustee may also be removed
at any time by the certificateholders evidencing not less than 50% of the voting
rights in the Trust Estate, except that any Certificate registered in the name
of the Depositor or any affiliate thereof will not be taken into account in
determining whether the requisite Voting Rights in the Trust Estate necessary to
effect this removal have been obtained. Any resignation and removal of the
Trustee, and the appointment of a successor trustee, will not become effective
until acceptance of the appointment by the successor trustee. The Trustee, and
any successor trustee, must be (a) an institution the deposits of which are
fully insured by the FDIC and (b) a corporation or banking association organized
and doing business under the laws of the United States of America or of any
State, authorized under those laws to exercise corporate trust powers, having a
75
combined capital and surplus of not less than $50,000,000 and subject to
supervision or examination by Federal or State authority and (c) with respect to
every successor trustee, either an institution (i) the long term unsecured debt
obligations meet certain minimum ratings of the applicable rating agencies or
(ii) whose serving as Trustee would not result in the lowering of the ratings
originally assigned to any class of Certificates.
GENERAL
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 211/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
CONDOMINIUMS
COOPERATIVES
76
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 212/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
FORECLOSURE
have in determining the exact status of title and because the physical condition
of the property may have deteriorated during the foreclosure proceedings, it is
uncommon for a third party to purchase the property at a foreclosure sale.
77
Rather, it is common for the lender to purchase the property from the trustee or
receiver for an amount equal to the unpaid principal amount of the note, accrued
and unpaid interest and the expenses of foreclosure. Subject to the right of the
borrower in some states to remain in possession during the redemption period,
the lender then will assume the burdens of ownership, including obtaining
casualty insurance and making repairs at its expense that are necessary to
render the property suitable for sale. The lender will commonly obtain the
services of a real estate broker and pay the broker's commission in connection
with the sale of the property. Depending upon market conditions, the ultimate
proceeds of the sale of the property may not equal the lender's investment in
the property. Any loss may be reduced by the receipt of mortgage insurance
proceeds, if any, or by judicial action against the borrower for the deficiency.
See "--Anti-Deficiency Legislation, the Bankruptcy Code and Other Limitations on
Lenders" below.
COOPERATIVES
"UCC") and the security agreement relating to those shares. Article 9 of the UCC
requires that a sale be conducted in a "commercially reasonable" manner. Whether
a foreclosure sale has been conducted in a "commercially reasonable" manner will
depend on the facts in each case. In determining commercial reasonableness, a
court will look to the notice given the debtor and the method, manner, time,
place and terms of the foreclosure. Generally, a sale conducted according to the
usual practice of banks selling similar collateral will be considered reasonably
conducted.
Article 9 of the UCC provides that the proceeds of the sale will be
applied first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale and then to satisfy the
indebtedness secured by the lender's security interest. The recognition
agreement, however, generally provides that the lender's right to the
reimbursement is subject to the right of the cooperative corporation to receive
sums due under the proprietary lease or occupancy agreement. If there are
proceeds remaining, the lender must account to the tenant-stockholder for the
surplus. Conversely, if a portion of the indebtedness remains unpaid, the
tenant-stockholder is generally responsible for the deficiency. See
"--Anti-Deficiency Legislation, the Bankruptcy Code and Other Limitations on
Lenders" below.
LEASEHOLDS
78
RIGHTS OF REDEMPTION
79
The Master Servicer generally will not be required under the pooling
and servicing agreement to pursue deficiency judgments on the Mortgage Loans
even if permitted by law.
A homeowner may file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code under any of
three different chapters of the Bankruptcy Code.
80
the borrower elects to retain the property, the property is the borrower's
principal residence and the property is the lender's only collateral. Certain
courts have allowed modifications when the mortgage loan is secured both by the
debtor's principal residence and by collateral that is not "inextricably bound"
to the real property, such as appliances, machinery, or furniture.
The Code provides priority to certain tax liens over the lien of the
mortgage. In addition, substantive requirements are imposed upon mortgage
lenders in connection with the origination and the servicing of mortgage loans
by numerous federal and some state consumer protection laws. These laws include
the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Equal
Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Credit Billing Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, and
related statutes. These federal laws impose specific statutory liabilities upon
lenders who originate mortgage loans and who fail to comply with the provisions
of the applicable laws. In some cases, this liability may affect assignees of
the Mortgage Loans.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 218/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
81
Title insurance generally available on those Mortgage Loans may exclude coverage
for some of the risks described in this paragraph.
"DUE-ON-SALE" CLAUSES
The Garn Act created a limited exemption from its general rule of
enforceability for "due-on-sale" clauses in certain mortgage loans ("WINDOW
PERIOD LOANS") which were originated by non-federal lenders and made or assumed
in certain states ("WINDOW PERIOD STATES") during the period, prior to October
15, 1982, in which that state prohibited the enforcement of "due-on-sale"
clauses by constitutional provision, statute or statewide court decision (the
"WINDOW PERIOD"). Though neither the Garn Act nor the OTS regulations actually
names the Window Period States, Freddie Mac has taken the position, in
prescribing mortgage loan servicing standards with respect to mortgage loans
which it has purchased, that the Window Period States were: Arizona, Arkansas,
California, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Utah and
Washington. Under the Garn Act, unless a Window Period State took action by
October 15, 1985, the end of the Window Period, to further regulate enforcement
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 219/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
82
83
Generally, under the terms of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the
"RELIEF ACT"), a borrower who enters military service after the origination of
their Mortgage Loan (including a borrower who is a member of the National Guard
or is in reserve status at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan and
is later called to active duty) may not be charged interest, including fees and
charges, in excess of 6% per annum during the period of the borrower's active
duty status. In addition to adjusting the interest, the lender must forgive this
interest in excess of 6% per annum, unless a court or administrative agency
orders otherwise upon the application of the lender. It is possible that the
Relief Act could have an effect, for an indeterminate period of time, on the
ability of the Servicer to collect full amounts of interest on certain of the
Mortgage Loans in a Trust Estate. Any shortfall in interest collections
resulting from the application of the Relief Act or any amendment thereto could
result in losses to the holders of the Certificates of the related series.
Further, the Relief Act imposes limitations which would impair the ability of
the Servicer to foreclose on an affected Mortgage Loan during the borrower's
period of active duty status. Thus, in the event that an affected Mortgage Loan
goes into default, there may be delays and losses occasioned by the inability to
realize upon the Mortgaged Property in a timely fashion. In addition, the Relief
Act provides broad discretion for a court to modify a mortgage loan upon
application of the mortgagor. Certain states have enacted comparable legislation
which may lead to the modification of a mortgage loan or interfere with or
affect the ability of the Servicer to timely collect payments of principal and
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 221/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
interest on, or to foreclose on, Mortgage Loans of borrowers in these states who
are active or reserve members of the armed services or national guard. For
example, California has extended legislation providing protection equivalent to
that provided by the Relief Act to California national guard members called up
for active service by the Governor or President and reservists called to active
duty.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
84
A decision in May 1990 of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Fleet Factors Corp. very narrowly construed
the CERCLA Secured-Creditor Exemption. The court's opinion suggested that a
lender need not have involved itself in the day-to-day operations of the
facility or participated in decisions relating to hazardous waste to be liable
under CERCLA; rather, liability could attach to a lender if its involvement with
the management of the facility were broad enough to support the inference that
the lender had the capacity to influence the borrower's treatment of hazardous
waste. The court added that a lender's capacity to influence those decisions
could be inferred from the extent of its involvement in the facility's financial
management. A subsequent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit in In re Bergsoe Metal Corp., apparently disagreeing with, but not
expressly contradicting, the Fleet Factors court, held that a secured lender had
no liability absent "some actual management of the facility" on the part of the
lender.
85
86
reasonable or found that the sale by a trustee under a deed of trust or under a
mortgage having a power of sale does not involve sufficient state action to
afford constitutional protections to the borrower.
GENERAL
GENERAL
87
88
89
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 228/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
(c) The loan-to-value ratio (where the loan amount equals the sum of
(i) the outstanding principal balance due under any obligation
which is held by the issuing entity and (ii) the outstanding
principal balance(s) of any other obligation(s) of higher
priority (whether or not held by the issuing entity) which are
secured by the same collateral) of the loans does not exceed
125%.
OTHER EXEMPTIONS
retained by the pool sponsor." It appears that, for purposes of PTCE 83-1, the
term "mortgage pool pass-through certificate" would include Certificates issued
in a single class or in multiple classes that evidence the beneficial ownership
of both a specified percentage of future interest payments (after permitted
deductions) and a specified percentage of future principal payments on a Trust
Estate.
90
However, it appears that PTCE 83-1 does not or might not apply to the
purchase and holding of:
o Residual Certificates;
o Subordinate Certificates;
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 230/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Although Non-ERISA Plans and Exempt Plans are not considered ERISA
Plans for purposes of the preceding discussion, Non-ERISA Plans are subject to
the prohibited transaction provisions of Code Section 4975, and both Non-ERISA
Plans and Exempt Plans may be subject to certain other ERISA-like requirements
of applicable law. As a result, before purchasing any Certificates by or on
behalf of a Non-ERISA Plan or any Exempt Plan, the prospective purchaser should
exercise special caution and should consult with its legal counsel concerning
the propriety and implications of its investment under the Code or other
applicable law.
91
DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE RULES AND THE PENALTIES IMPOSED UPON
PERSONS INVOLVED IN PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS, IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT
POTENTIAL INVESTORS WHO ARE ACTING ON BEHALF OF A BENEFIT PLAN OR ANY OTHER
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN OR ARRANGEMENT CONSULT WITH THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING
THE CONSEQUENCES UNDER ERISA, THE CODE AND OTHER APPLICABLE LAW OF THEIR
ACQUISITION AND OWNERSHIP OF CERTIFICATES.
92
Corporation, the OCC and the OTS, effective May 26, 1998, and by the NCUA,
effective October 1, 1998. This policy statement sets forth general guidelines
which depository institutions must follow in managing risks (including market,
credit, liquidity, operational (transaction), and legal risks) applicable to all
securities (including mortgage pass-through securities and mortgage-derivative
products) used for investment purposes.
93
rendered with respect to tax matters affecting the Securities offered hereunder
by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP or
Hunton & Williams LLP. The opinion stated above and the opinions specifically
identified as such in the following discussion are the only opinions that
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 233/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP or Hunton
& Williams LLP has been asked to render with respect to the tax consequences of
the purchase, ownership and dispositions of the securities offered under this
prospectus and prospectus supplement. This discussion is directed solely to
Securityholders that hold the Securities as capital assets within the meaning of
Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "CODE") and
does not purport to discuss all federal income tax consequences that may be
applicable to particular categories of investors, some of which (such as banks,
insurance companies and foreign investors) may be subject to special rules.
GENERAL
94
Treasury regulations, each REMIC Pool will qualify as a REMIC. In that case, the
Regular Certificates will be considered to be "regular interests" in the REMIC
Pool and generally will be treated for federal income tax purposes as if they
were newly originated debt instruments, and the Residual Certificates will be
considered to be "residual interests" in the REMIC Pool. The prospectus
supplement for each series of Certificates will indicate whether one or more
REMIC elections with respect to the related Trust Estate will be made, in which
event references to "REMIC" or "REMIC POOL" in this prospectus shall be deemed
to refer to each REMIC Pool.
Where two REMIC Pools are a part of a tiered structure they will be
treated as one REMIC for purposes of the tests described above respecting asset
ownership of more or less than 95%. In addition, if the assets of the REMIC
include Buy-Down Loans, it is possible that the percentage of the assets
constituting "loans . . . secured by an interest in real property which is . . .
residential real property" for purposes of Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v), may
be required to be reduced by the amount of the related Buydown Funds. REMIC
Certificates held by a regulated investment company will not constitute
"Government securities" within the meaning of Code Section 851(b)(3)(A)(i).
QUALIFICATION AS A REMIC
"permitted investments." The REMIC Regulations provide a safe harbor under which
the de minimis requirement will be met if at all times the aggregate adjusted
basis of the nonqualified assets is less than 1% of the aggregate adjusted basis
of all the REMIC Pool's assets. An entity that fails to meet the safe harbor may
nevertheless demonstrate that it holds no more than a de minimis amount of
nonqualified assets. A REMIC Pool also must provide "reasonable arrangements" to
prevent its residual interests from being held by "disqualified organizations"
or agents thereof and must furnish applicable tax information to transferors or
agents that violate this requirement. See "--Taxation of Residual
Certificates--Tax-Related Restrictions on Transfer of Residual
Certificates--Disqualified Organizations" below.
95
If an entity, such as the REMIC Pool, fails to comply with one or more
of the ongoing requirements of the Code for REMIC status during any taxable
year, the Code provides that the entity will not be treated as a REMIC for that
year and any following year. In this event, an entity with multiple classes of
ownership interests may be treated as a separate association taxable as a
corporation under Treasury regulations, and the Regular Certificates may be
treated as equity interests in that corporation. The Code, however, authorizes
the Treasury Department to issue regulations that address situations where
failure to meet one or more of the requirements for REMIC status occurs
inadvertently and in good faith, and disqualification of the REMIC Pool would
occur absent regulatory relief. Investors should be aware, however, that the
Conference Committee Report to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "1986 ACT")
indicates that the relief may be accompanied by sanctions, such as the
imposition of a corporate tax on
96
all or a portion of the REMIC Pool's income for the period of time in which the
requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied.
GENERAL
97
Under the method described above, the daily portions of Original Issue
Discount required to be included in income by a Regular Certificateholder
generally will increase to take into account prepayments on the Regular
Certificates as a result of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans that exceed the
Prepayment Assumption, and generally will decrease (but not below zero for any
period) if the prepayments are slower than the Prepayment Assumption. An
increase in prepayments on the Mortgage Loans for a series of Regular
Certificates can result in
98
ACQUISITION PREMIUM
99
may lead to different timing of income inclusion than would be the case under
the OID Regulations for non-contingent debt instruments. Furthermore,
application of these principles could lead to the characterization of gain on
the sale of contingent interest Regular Certificates as ordinary income.
Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the appropriate treatment
of any Regular Certificate that does not pay interest at a fixed rate or
variable rate as described in this paragraph.
MARKET DISCOUNT
100
Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that until those
regulations are issued, this market discount would accrue either (i) on the
basis of a constant interest rate, or (ii) in the ratio of stated interest
allocable to the relevant period to the sum of the interest for that period plus
the remaining interest as of the end of that period, or in the case of a Regular
Certificate issued with Original Issue Discount, in the ratio of Original Issue
Discount accrued for the relevant period to the sum of the Original Issue
Discount accrued for the period plus the remaining Original Issue Discount as of
the end of the period. That purchaser also generally will be required to treat a
portion of any gain on a sale or exchange of the Regular Certificate as ordinary
income to the extent of the market discount accrued to the date of disposition
under one of the foregoing methods, less any accrued market discount previously
reported as ordinary income as partial distributions in reduction of the stated
redemption price at maturity were received. That purchaser will be required to
defer deduction of a portion of the excess of the interest paid or accrued on
indebtedness incurred to purchase or carry a Regular Certificate over the
interest distributable thereon. The deferred portion of that interest expense in
any taxable year generally will not exceed the accrued market discount on the
Regular Certificate for that year. Any deferred interest expense is, in general,
allowed as a deduction not later than the year in which the related market
discount income is recognized or the Regular Certificate is disposed of. As an
alternative to the inclusion of market discount in income on the foregoing
basis, the Regular Certificateholder may elect to include market discount in
income currently as it accrues on all market discount instruments acquired by
the Regular Certificateholder in that taxable year or following taxable years,
in which case the interest deferral rule will not apply. See "-- Election to
Treat All Interest Under the Constant Yield Method" below regarding an
alternative manner in which this election may be deemed to be made.
PREMIUM
101
TREATMENT OF LOSSES
be allowed to deduct as a short-term capital loss any loss sustained during the
taxable year on account of a portion of any Regular Certificates becoming wholly
worthless. Although the matter is not free from doubt, non-corporate Regular
Certificateholders should be allowed a bad debt deduction at the time the
principal balance of their Regular Certificates is reduced to reflect losses
resulting from any liquidated Mortgage Loans. The Internal Revenue Service,
however, could take the position that non-corporate holders will be allowed a
bad debt deduction to reflect those losses only after all the Mortgage Loans
remaining in the Trust Estate have been liquidated or the applicable class of
Regular Certificates has been otherwise retired. The Internal Revenue Service
could also assert that losses on the Regular Certificates are deductible based
on some other method that may defer these deductions for all holders, such as
reducing future cash flow for purposes of computing Original Issue Discount this
may have the effect of creating "negative" Original Issue Discount which would
be deductible only against future positive Original Issue Discount or otherwise
upon termination of the class. Regular Certificateholders are urged to consult
their tax advisors regarding the appropriate timing, amount and character of any
loss sustained with respect to the Regular Certificates. While losses
attributable to interest previously reported as income should be deductible as
ordinary losses by both corporate and non-corporate holders, the Internal
Revenue Service may take the position that losses attributable to accrued
Original Issue Discount may only be deducted as capital losses in the case of
non-corporate holders who do not hold the Regular Certificates in connection
with a trade or business. Special loss rules are applicable to banks and thrift
institutions, including rules regarding reserves for bad debts. These taxpayers
are advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the treatment of losses on
Regular Certificates.
102
income actually includible in the gross income of the holder with respect to its
Regular Certificate. In addition, gain or loss recognized from the sale of a
Regular Certificate by certain banks or thrift institutions will be treated as
ordinary income or loss under Code Section 582(c). Long-term capital gains of
certain non-corporate taxpayers generally are subject to a lower maximum tax
rate than ordinary income or short-term capital gains of those taxpayers for
property held for more than one year. The maximum tax rate for corporations is
the same with respect to both ordinary income and capital gains. TAXATION OF
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES
103
The amount of any net loss of the REMIC Pool that may be taken into
account by the Residual Holder is limited to the adjusted basis of the Residual
Certificate as of the close of the quarter (or time of disposition of the
Residual Certificate if earlier), determined without taking into account the net
loss for the quarter. The initial basis of a purchaser of a Residual Certificate
is the amount paid for the Residual Certificate. This basis will be increased by
the amount of taxable income of the REMIC Pool reportable by the Residual Holder
and will be decreased (but not below zero), first, by a cash distribution from
the REMIC Pool and, second, by the amount of loss of the REMIC Pool reportable
by the Residual Holder. Any loss that is disallowed on account of this
limitation may be carried over indefinitely for a Residual Holder as to whom a
loss was disallowed and may be used by that Residual Holder only to offset any
income generated by the same REMIC Pool.
average life of all the regular and residual interests issued by the related
REMIC, determined based on actual distributions projected as remaining to be
made on those interests under the applicable prepayment assumption. If the
Residual Holder sells or otherwise disposes of the residual interest, any
unrecognized portion of the inducement fee generally is required to be taken
into account at the time of the sale or disposition. A prospective purchaser of
a Residual Certificate should consult with its tax counsel regarding the effect
of these regulations.
104
Holder will not recover a portion of its basis until termination of the REMIC
Pool unless future Treasury regulations provide for periodic adjustments to the
REMIC income otherwise reportable by the holder. The REMIC Regulations currently
in effect do not provide for that outcome. See "--Treatment of Certain Items of
REMIC Income and Expense--Market Discount" below regarding the basis of Mortgage
Loans to the REMIC Pool and "--Sale or Exchange of a Residual Certificate" below
regarding possible treatment of a loss upon termination of the REMIC Pool as a
capital loss.
Market Discount. The REMIC Pool will have market discount income on
the Mortgage Loans if, in general, the basis of the REMIC Pool in those Mortgage
Loans is exceeded by their unpaid principal balances. The REMIC Pool's basis in
Mortgage Loans is generally the fair market value of the Mortgage Loans
immediately after their transfer to the REMIC Pool. The REMIC Regulations
provide that this basis is equal in the aggregate to the issue prices of all
regular and residual interests in the REMIC Pool. The accrued portion of the
market discount would be recognized currently as an item of ordinary income in a
manner similar to Original Issue Discount. Market discount income generally
should accrue in the manner described above under "--Taxation of Regular
Certificates--Market Discount."
105
Certificate, plus the amount of daily accruals of REMIC income described in this
paragraph for all prior quarters, decreased by any distributions made on the
Residual Certificate prior to the beginning of the quarterly period.
Accordingly, the portion of the REMIC Pool's taxable income that will be treated
as excess inclusions will be a larger portion of that income as the adjusted
issue price of the Residual Certificates diminishes.
There are three rules for determining the effect of excess inclusions
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 249/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
106
States, any state or political subdivision thereof, any foreign government, any
international organization, any agency or instrumentality of any of the
foregoing (provided, that this term does not include an instrumentality if all
of its activities are subject to tax and a majority of its board of directors is
not selected by any similar governmental entity), any cooperative organization
furnishing electric energy or providing telephone service to persons in rural
areas as described in Code Section 1381(a)(2)(C), and any organization (other
than a farmers' cooperative described in Code Section 521) that is exempt from
taxation under the Code unless the organization is subject to the tax on
unrelated business income imposed by Code Section 511, (ii) "PASS-THROUGH
ENTITY" means any regulated investment company, real estate investment trust,
common trust fund, partnership, trust or estate and certain corporations
operating on a cooperative basis, and (iii) an "ELECTING LARGE PARTNERSHIP"
means any partnership having more than 100 members during the preceding tax year
(other than certain service partnerships and commodity pools), which elect to
apply simplified reporting provisions under the Code. Except as may be provided
in Treasury regulations, any person holding an interest in a Pass-Through Entity
as a nominee for another will, with respect to that interest, be treated as a
Pass-Through Entity.
The pooling and servicing agreement for a series will provide that no
legal or beneficial interest in a Residual Certificate may be transferred or
registered unless (i) the proposed transferee furnishes to the Trustee an
affidavit providing its taxpayer identification number and stating that the
transferee is the beneficial owner of the Residual Certificate and is not a
Disqualified Organization and is not purchasing the Residual Certificate on
behalf of a Disqualified Organization (i.e., as a broker, nominee or middleman
thereof) and (ii) the transferor provides a statement in writing to the Trustee
that it has no actual knowledge that the affidavit is false. Moreover, the
pooling and servicing agreement will provide that any attempted or purported
transfer in violation of these transfer restrictions will be null and void and
will vest no rights in any purported transferee. Each Residual Certificate with
respect to a series will bear a legend referring to these restrictions on
transfer, and each Residual Holder will be deemed to have agreed, as a condition
of ownership thereof, to any amendments to the related pooling and servicing
agreement required under the Code or applicable Treasury regulations to
effectuate the foregoing restrictions. Information necessary to compute an
applicable excise tax must be furnished to the Internal Revenue Service and to
the requesting party within 60 days of the request, and the Sponsor or the
Trustee may charge a fee for computing and providing this information.
107
as the holder of the non-economic residual interest, the transferee may incur
tax liabilities in excess of any cash flows generated by the interest and that
the transferee intends to pay taxes associated with holding the residual
interest as they become due, (iii) the transferee represents to the transferor
that it will not cause income from the residual certificate to be attributable
to a foreign permanent establishment or fixed base (within the meaning of an
applicable income tax treaty) of the transferee or of any other person, and (iv)
one of the two following tests is satisfied: either
108
The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act provides that, except
as provided in Treasury regulations yet to be issued, the wash sale rules of
Code Section 1091 will apply to dispositions of Residual Certificates where the
seller of the Residual Certificate, during the period beginning six months
before the sale or disposition of the Residual Certificate and ending six months
after that sale or disposition, acquires (or enters into any other transaction
that results in the application of Code Section 1091) any residual interest in
any REMIC or any interest in a "taxable mortgage pool" (such as a non-REMIC
owner trust) that is economically comparable to a Residual Certificate.
MARK-TO-MARKET REGULATIONS
PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
109
The REMIC Pool will be subject to federal income tax at the highest
corporate rate on "net income from foreclosure property," determined by
reference to the rules applicable to real estate investment trusts. Generally,
property acquired by deed in lieu of foreclosure would be treated as
"foreclosure property" for a period not exceeding the close of the third
calendar year after the year in which the REMIC Pool acquired the property, with
a possible extension. Net income from foreclosure property generally means gain
from the sale of a foreclosure property that is inventory property and gross
income from foreclosure property other than qualifying rents and other
qualifying income for a real estate investment trust. It is not anticipated that
the REMIC Pool will have any taxable net income from foreclosure property.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
110
among other things, items of REMIC income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit in a
unified administrative proceeding. The Master Servicer or the Trustee, as
specified in the related pooling and servicing agreement, will be obligated to
act as "tax matters person," as defined in applicable Treasury regulations, with
respect to the REMIC Pool, in its capacity as either Residual Holder or agent of
the Residual Holders. If the Code or applicable Treasury regulations do not
permit the Master Servicer or the Trustee to act as tax matters person in its
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 255/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
capacity as agent of the Residual Holders, the Residual Holder chosen by the
Residual Holders or such other person specified pursuant to Treasury regulations
will be required to act as tax matters person.
REGULAR CERTIFICATES
111
RESIDUAL CERTIFICATES
The Conference Committee Report to the 1986 Act indicates that amounts
paid to Residual Holders who are non-U.S. Persons generally should be treated as
interest for purposes of the 30% (or lower treaty rate) United States
withholding tax. Treasury regulations provide that amounts distributed to
Residual Holders may qualify as "portfolio interest," subject to the conditions
described in "--Regular Certificates" above, but only if (i) the Mortgage Loans
were issued after July 18, 1984 and (ii) the Trust Estate or segregated pool of
assets in the Trust Estate (as to which a separate REMIC election will be made),
to which the Residual Certificate relates, consists of obligations issued in
"registered form" within the meaning of Code Section 163(f)(1). Generally,
Mortgage Loans will not be, but regular interests in another REMIC Pool will be,
considered obligations issued in registered form. Furthermore, a Residual Holder
will not be entitled to any exemption from the 30% withholding tax (or lower
treaty rate) to the extent of that portion of REMIC taxable income that
constitutes an "excess inclusion." See "--Taxation of Residual Certificates--
Limitations on Offset or Exemption of REMIC Income" above. If the amounts paid
to Residual Holders who are non-U.S. Persons are effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business within the United States by those non-U.S.
Persons, 30% (or lower treaty rate) withholding will not apply. Instead, the
amounts paid to the non-U.S. Persons will be subject to United States federal
income tax at regular rates. If 30% (or lower treaty rate) withholding is
applicable, those amounts generally will be taken into account for purposes of
withholding only when paid or otherwise distributed (or when the Residual
Certificate is disposed of) under rules similar to withholding upon disposition
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 257/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
BACKUP WITHHOLDING
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
112
GENERAL
113
TAX STATUS
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 259/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
PREMIUM
The Original Issue Discount rules of Code Sections 1271 through 1275
will be applicable to a Certificateholder's interest in those Mortgage Loans as
to which the conditions for the application of those sections are met. Rules
regarding periodic inclusion of Original Issue Discount income are applicable to
mortgages of corporations originated after May 27, 1969, mortgages of
noncorporate mortgagors (other than individuals) originated after July 1, 1982,
and mortgages of individuals originated after March 2, 1984. Under the OID
Regulations, Original Issue Discount could arise by the charging of points by
the originator of the mortgages in an amount greater than the statutory de
minimis exception, including a payment of points that is currently deductible by
the borrower under applicable Code provisions or, under certain circumstances,
by the presence of "teaser" rates on
114
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 260/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
the Mortgage Loans. See "--Stripped Certificates" below regarding Original Issue
Discount on Stripped Certificates.
MARKET DISCOUNT
purposes, the corpus of the grantor trust could be viewed as excluding the
portion of the Mortgage Loans the ownership of which is attributed to the Master
Servicer, or as including this portion as a second class of equitable interest.
Applicable Treasury regulations treat this arrangement as a fixed investment
trust, since the multiple classes of trust interests should be treated as merely
facilitating direct investments in the trust assets and the existence of
multiple classes of ownership interests is incidental to that purpose. In
general, this recharacterization should not have any significant effect upon the
timing or amount of income reported by a certificateholder, except that the
income reported by a cash method holder may be slightly accelerated. See
"--Stripped Certificates" below for a further description of the federal income
tax treatment of stripped bonds and stripped coupons.
115
STRIPPED CERTIFICATES
GENERAL
116
117
the issue price of a Stripped Certificate will be the purchase price paid by
each holder, and the stated redemption price at maturity will include the
aggregate amount of the payments to be made on the Stripped Certificate to the
Stripped Certificateholder, presumably under the Prepayment Assumption, other
than qualified stated interest.
118
TAX STATUS
119
120
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
121
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 269/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
USE OF PROCEEDS
The Depositor will apply the net proceeds from the sale of each series
of Certificates for the purchase of the Mortgage Assets serving as security for
those Certificates.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LEGAL MATTERS
The legality of, and certain federal income tax matters related to,
the Certificates of a series will be passed upon for the Depositor by Orrick,
Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, D.C., Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP,
New York, New York or Hunton &Williams LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, as
specified in the related prospectus supplement.
122
RATING
REPORTS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
The Trustee or the Master Servicer will prepare and make available to
the certificateholders of each series statements containing information with
respect to principal and interest payments and the related Trust Estate, as
described under "Description of Certificates--Reports to Certificateholders."
Copies of these statements will be filed with the Commission through its EDGAR
system located at http://www.sec.gov under the name of the Trust as an exhibit
to the Trust's monthly distribution reports on Form 10-D for each series of
Certificates for so long as the Trust is subject to the reporting requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Monthly distribution reports
on Form 10-D are generally due within 15 days after each Distribution Date,
unless such due date falls on a weekend or holiday, in which case the due date
extends to the first business day following. In addition, each party to the
servicing function, for a series of Certificates (generally the Trustee and the
Servicer (any Master Servicer)) will furnish to the Trustee or Master Servicer,
as applicable, the compliance statements, Assessments of Compliance and
Attestation Reports detailed under "The Pooling and Servicing
Agreement--Evidence as to Compliance." Copies of these statements and reports
will be filed with the SEC under the name of the Trust as an exhibit to the
Trust's annual statement on Form 10-K for each series of Certificates.
At your request, the Depositor will send copies of these documents and
reports to you at no charge. You may contact the Depositor by writing or calling
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 271/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
it at the address and phone number listed under "Where You Can Find More
Information."
123
electronic version of this prospectus. The Depositor has filed the registration
statement, including all exhibits, through the EDGAR system and therefore those
materials should be available by logging onto the Commission's Web site. The
Commission maintains computer terminals providing access to the EDGAR system at
the office referred to above. Copies of any documents incorporated to this
prospectus by reference will be provided to each person to whom a prospectus is
delivered upon written or oral request directed to Banc of America Funding
Corporation, 214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255, Attention:
Secretary, telephone number (704) 386-2400.
124
INDEX OF TERMS
PAGE
----
1986 Act................................................................. 96
Accretion Directed Certificates.......................................... 36
Accrual Certificates..................................................... 39
Advances................................................................. 65
Assessment of Compliance................................................. 71
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 272/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
125
INDEX OF TERMS
PAGE
----
Paying Agent............................................................. 65
PC Agreement............................................................. 26
PC Servicer.............................................................. 26
PC Sponsor............................................................... 26
PC Trustee............................................................... 26
Periodic Advance......................................................... 65
Periodic Reports......................................................... 123
Planned Amortization Certificates........................................ 37
Prepayment Assumption.................................................... 98
Principal Only Certificates.............................................. 39
Private Certificates..................................................... 25
PTCE..................................................................... 87
Ratio Strip Certificates................................................. 37
RCRA..................................................................... 85
RCRA Secured-Creditor Exemption.......................................... 85
Regular Certificateholder................................................ 97
Regular Certificates..................................................... 94
Related.................................................................. 41
Relevant Depositary...................................................... 29
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 274/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
Relief Act............................................................... 84
REMIC.................................................................... 94
REMIC Certificates....................................................... 94
REMIC Combination........................................................ 41
REMIC Pool............................................................... 94
REO Property............................................................. 65
Residual Certificates.................................................... 94
Residual Holders......................................................... 103
Restricted Group......................................................... 90
Rules.................................................................... 29
S&P...................................................................... 89
Scheduled Amortization Certificates...................................... 38
Senior Certificates...................................................... 38
Sequential Pay Certificates.............................................. 38
Servicer................................................................. 57
Servicer Custodial Account............................................... 62
Servicing Advances....................................................... 65
SMMEA.................................................................... 92
Sponsor.................................................................. 54
Standard Hazard Insurance Policy......................................... 68
Startup Day.............................................................. 95
Step Coupon Certificates................................................. 40
Stripped Certificateholder............................................... 117
Stripped Certificates.................................................... 116
Subordinate Certificates................................................. 38
Subsidy Account.......................................................... 19
Subsidy Loans............................................................ 19
Subsidy Payments......................................................... 19
Super Senior Certificates................................................ 38
Super Senior Support Certificates........................................ 38
Support Certificates..................................................... 36
TAC Certificates......................................................... 39
Targeted Amortization Certificates....................................... 39
Texas Home Equity Laws................................................... 81
Tiered Payment Mortgage Loans............................................ 19
Title V.................................................................. 83
Trust.................................................................... 17
Trust Estate............................................................. 17
Trustee.................................................................. 17
U.S. Person.............................................................. 109
UCC...................................................................... 78
Underlying Loans......................................................... 25
Underlying Servicing Agreement........................................... 57
Underwriter's Exemption.................................................. 89
VA....................................................................... 23
Variable Rate Certificates............................................... 40
Window Period............................................................ 82
Window Period Loans...................................................... 82
Window Period States..................................................... 82
126
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 275/277
3/25/2018 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm
$558,078,100
(APPROXIMATE)
----------
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
----------
The Offered Certificates are not being offered in any state where the offer is
not permitted.
The Depositor does not claim the accuracy of the information in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus as of any date other than the dates
stated on their respective covers.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/934377/000095013606005482/file1.htm 277/277
Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new
government controlled by you, the American People. There is nothing the political
establishment will not do, and no lie they will not tell, to hold on to their prestige and
power at your expense.
The Washington establishment, and the financial and media corporations that fund it,
exists for only one reason: to protect and enrich itself.
The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election. As an example, just
one single trade deal they’d like to pass, involves trillions of dollars controlled by many
countries, corporations and lobbyists.
For those who control the levers of power in Washington, and for the global special
interests they partner with, our campaign represents an existential threat.
This is not simply another 4-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our
civilization that will determine whether or not We The People reclaim control over our
government.
The political establishment that is trying everything to stop us, is the same group
responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic
and foreign policies that have bled this country dry. The political establishment has
brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs, as they flee to Mexico, China
and other countries throughout the world. Our just-announced jobs numbers are
anemic, and our gross domestic product, or GDP, is barely above one percent. Workers
in the United States, were making less than they were almost 20 years ago – and yet
they are working harder.
It’s a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have
robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into
the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.
Just look at what this corrupt establishment has done to our cities like Detroit and Flint,
Michigan – and rural towns in Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina and across our
country. They have stripped these towns bare, and raided the wealth for themselves and
taken away their jobs.
The Clinton Machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this firsthand in
the WikiLeaks documents in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international
banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial
powers.
And, likewise, the emails show that the Clinton Machine is so closely and irrevocably
tied to media organizations that she is given the questions and answers in advance of
her debates. Clinton is also given approval and veto power over quotes written about her
in the New York Times. And the emails show the reporters collaborate and conspire
directly with the Clinton Campaign on helping her win the election.
With their control over our government at stake, with trillions of dollars on the line, the
Clinton Machine is determined to achieve the destruction of our campaign, which has
now become a movement the likes of which our country has never seen before – and we
won’t let them do that.
The most powerful weapon deployed by the Clintons is the corporate media. Let’s be
clear on one thing: the corporate media in our country is no longer involved in
journalism. They are a political special interest, no different than any lobbyist or other
financial entity with an agenda. And their agenda is to elect the Clintons at any cost, at
any price, no matter how many lives they destroy.
This is not just conspiracy but reality, and you and I know it.
The establishment and their media enablers wield control over this nation through
means that are well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a
racist, a xenophobe and morally deformed. They will attack you, they will slander you,
they will seek to destroy your career and reputation. And they will lie, lie and lie even
more.
The Clintons are criminals. This is well-documented, and the establishment that
protects them has engaged in a massive cover-up of widespread criminal activity at the
State Department and Clinton Foundation in order to keep the Clintons in power. Never
in history have we seen such a cover-up as this, one that includes the destruction of
33,000 emails, 13 phones, laptops, missing boxes of evidence, and on and on.
People who are capable of such crimes against our nation are capable of anything.
[…] But I take all of these slings and arrows for you. I take them for our movement, so
that we can have our country back. Our great civilization, here in America and across
the civilized world, has come upon a moment of reckoning.
We’ve seen it in the United Kingdom, where they voted to liberate themselves from
global government and global trade deals and global immigration deals that have
destroyed their sovereignty.
But the central base of world political power is here in America, and it is our corrupt
political establishment that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical
globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people.
Their financial resources are unlimited. Their political resources are unlimited. Their
media resources are unlimited. And, most importantly, the depths of their immorality is
unlimited.
Our political establishment has no soul. I knew these false attacks would come. I knew
this day would arrive. And I knew the American people would rise above it and vote for
the future they deserve.
The only thing that can stop the Corrupt Clinton Machine is you. The only force strong
enough to save this country is you. The only people brave enough to vote out this
corrupt establishment is you, the American People.
They control the Department of Justice, and they even clandestinely meet with the
Attorney General of the United States – in the back of her airplane, while on the runway
– for 39 minutes – to most likely discuss her reappointment in a Clinton Administration
just prior to the Attorney General making a decision over whether or not to prosecute
Hillary Clinton.
Likewise, they have corrupted the Director of the FBI to the point at which stories are
already saying the great men and women who work for the FBI are embarrassed and
ashamed to what he’s done to one of our great institutions. Hillary Clinton is guilty of all
of the things that Director Comey stated at his press conference and Congressional
hearings, and far more – and yet he let her off the hook, while others lives are being
destroyed for far less.
This is a conspiracy against you, the American people.
I didn’t need to do this. I built a great company, and I had a wonderful life. I could have
enjoyed the benefits of years of successful business for myself and my family, instead of
going through this absolute horror show of lies, deceptions and malicious attacks. I’m
doing it because this country has given me so much, and I feel strongly it was my turn to
give back.
Some people warned me this campaign would be a journey to hell. But they are wrong, it
will be a journey to heaven because we will help so many people.
In my former life, I was an insider as much as anybody else – and I know what’s like to
be an insider. Now I am being punished for leaving their special club and revealing to
you their great scam. Because I used to be part of the club, I’m the only one who can fix
it. I’m doing this for the people, and this movement is just right – and we will take back
this country for you and Make America Great Again.
The corrupt establishment knows that we are an existential threat to their criminal
enterprise. They know, that if we win, their power is gone and returned to you. The
clouds hanging over our government can be lifted, and replaced with a bright future –
but it all depends on whether we let the New York Times decide our future, or whether
we let the American people decide our future.
I will not lie to you. These false attacks hurt. To be lied about, to be slandered, to be
smeared so publicly and before your family, is painful.
What the Clinton Machine is doing to me, and my family, is egregious beyond words. It
is reprehensible beyond description.
But I also know, it’s not about me – it’s about all of you. It’s about all of us, together, as a
country.
It’s about the Veterans who need medical care, the mothers who’ve lost children to
terrorism and crime, it’s about the inner cities and the border towns who desperately
need our help, it’s about the millions of jobless Americans. This election is about the
people being crushed by Obamacare, and it’s about defeating ISIS and appointing
Supreme Court Justices who will defend our Constitution.
This election is also about the African-American and Hispanic communities whose
communities have been plunged into crime, poverty and failing schools by the policies of
Hillary Clinton. They’ve robbed these citizens of their future, and I will give them their
hope, jobs and opportunities back. I will deliver.
This election is about every man, woman and child in our country who deserves to live
in safety, prosperity and peace.
We will rise above the lies, the smears, and the ludicrous slanders from ludicrous
reporters.
Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives, finally, on November 8th. Join me in
taking back our country, and creating a bright and glorious new dawn for our people.
~ Donald Trump
EXHIBIT O
IFILED; KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/26/2018 09;03 AMI ■ INDEX NO. 506127/2016
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2018
PRESENT:
Defendants.
Recitation, as required by CPLR §2219(a), ofthe papers considered in the review of this
Motion: S
ca
Papers Numbered CD
CD
Moving Papers and Affidavits Annexed ]_ ro
Opposition 2 cn
Reply 3
r'
r"
Upon the foregoing cited papers, the Decision/Order on this Motion is as follows: -5^
Plaintiff moves for defaultjudgment and an order of reference. Defendant opposes, raising
various arguments, and cross-moves for dismissal.
"Generally ... in an action to foreclose a mortgage, a plaintiff establishes its prima facie case
through the production of the mortgage, the unpaid note, and evidence of default." Deutsche Bank
Natl Trust Co. v. Brewton, 142 A.D.3d 683,684(2d DepT 2016)(quoting Plaza Equities, LLC v.
Lamberti, 118 A.D.3d 688,689(2d Dep't 2014)). Plaintiff has done so.
1 of 2
FILED;"^PWilJil||)BgUhlTy CLERK 10/26/2018 09;03 AMI ' no. 506127/2016
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2018
^ " r
Defendant was served with the summons and complaint on .lune 16, 2016 via personal .ser\'ice
and filed an answer on March 9, 2017. As Defendant's answer was untimely. Plaintiff rejected it by
notice dated March 17, 2017. Defendant is in default and thus waived the defenses he raises in
To vacate his default, Defendant was required to show a reasonable excuse for his delay in
serving an answer. See, e.g., Torres v. Houses R Us, Inc., 182 A.D.2d 684,684(2d Dep't 1992).
Herein, Defendant denies the allegations against him, asserts that he did not waive his defenses, and
states that he spoke to Plaintiffs counsel on numerous occasions and was unable to obtain
information he requested from her. However, he does not present a reasonable excuse for not timely
appearing or answering in this matter. In light of the foregoing. Defendant is deemed in default.
KNTER:
CD
c->
[ND
cri
2 of 2
The Living Law Firm: 20 to Nothing on Foreclosures
Tonight— All Wins for Our Side
I want to make a name change from The People's Law Firm — which though correct, sounds a
bit like Mainland China — to The Living Law Firm, because what we are doing is for living
people.
Yes, you read the headline right. Twenty homes have been saved, in a row, out of twenty
million, without a single loss. I think that twenty straight wins says something important—
it says that we have it nailed. We have the fraud figured out. We have the facts. We have the
process. And we are busting case after case— but for this to really matter, more lawyers
have to take the plunge to come walk the walk as a Private Attorney General, more paralegals
have to be trained and it has to happen now.
It is of paramount importance that American homes and ranches and businesses be saved,
that American families not suffer eviction, and that this scourge of lawless fraud by the banks
be ended.
We CAN stop current foreclosures in their tracks and return millions of homes that have been
unlawfully foreclosed and seized back to their owners. We can do this not just some of the
time, but all of the time, not just for the lucky few and the wealthy and the famous—but for
Mom and Pop, too.
Standing here today I know full well that twenty wins is just a drop in the bucket. It's not even
a scratch on the surface of the biggest real estate fraud swindle and betrayal of trust in
history but I also know that the Truth has been loosed, and when what is True comes,
what is Faise must pass away.
We know that this announcement will bring on a flood of urgent pleas for help and we have to
admit that we don't even BEGIN to have the manpower and resources to answer the need at
this time so we ask that all of those battling foreclosures bear with us. We are continuing to
move forward as quickly as we can on as many fronts as possible. For lack of a better way to
proceed, we may establish a "Client Lottery" for now, and just draw names out of a hat to
determine which foreclosure clients The Living Law Firm represents.
The seed money people have sent and are sending is allowing us to get on our feet and
keeping the "boys in the field" supplied with paper and ink and filing fees and beans and rice.
No doubt by Wall Street standards this homegrown law firm is just a gritty little low-brow
bunch of scrappers but as of tonight, It's scrappers who have gone toe to toe twenty
times in a row, and carried off the prize.
(Note from the editor: Use the above email address from inside your own PayPal account by
clicking on tools at the top, and In the drop down menu click on Send Money. Then enter the
amount you want to send, and enter the above email address. You can also write a short note
if you like stating what It Is to be used for. If you don't send a note your donation will be used
for The Living Law Firm effort. This goes directly to Anna, and is a donation with no strings
attached and no promises made except that we will NOT quit.)
From: Anna von Reitz <avannavQn@amaii cnm>
To: michael <tokrichevskv1@vahnn mm>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: RAG in foreclosure
We are working on something even better right now. How tight are you for time in your
case? If you can stave them off another two months, we should have it all together and
simple as pie— not just to end the foreclosure, but to get back your actual patent escrow all
of it. I- . .
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:38 PM, michael <tokrichevskv1 @vahoo.cQm> wrote:
Dear Judge Anna!
2/3