Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
‘Animal Farm’ is an allegory of the Russian Revolution written by George Orwell, whose
main idea was to criticize the ideologies of the Russian Revolution.
‘Leadership’ is a main theme of this novella, and its nature has effectively been
portrayed.
Secondly, Orwell has done an admirable job of portraying the fickleness of leadership.
With time, this gets more evident in Napoleon’s character. For example, in the
beginning, when animalism was first introduced, the main motto was “FOUR LEGS
GOOD, TWO LEGS BAD”, while at the end it becomes “FOUR LEGS GOOD, TWO
LEGS BETTER”! With time, however, Napoleon’s sole aim was to remain in power. He
realized that the only way to do so was to interact with humans:. “.......agreement either
with Mr Pilkington or with Mr Frederick,” Thus, a contrast has been created- earlier,
Napoleon agreed that humans were enemies of the animals, but later, contradicted this
principle by interacting with them. Another example of the fickleness of leadership can
be seen in Chapters 4 and 5. In Chapter 4, Snowball’s valiance in the Battle of the
Cowshed has been rewarded: “The animals decided unanimously to create a military
decoration, ‘Animal Hero, First Class,’ which was conferred then and there on
Snowball…..”. However, Snowball’s valor, which was glorified, was put to question in
Chapter 5: “Snowball, who, as we know now, was no better than a criminal?” Here,
another contrast has been created by Orwell. A rhetorical question has been used by
Napoleon to coerce the animals to change their perspective.Snowball, who was
regarded to be a braveheart, has now been called a ‘criminal’ by Napoleon. Napoleon
also seemingly collected ‘evidence’ to prove that Snowball was at fault. This
emphasizes to what extent the shrewd pig would go to consolidate his power and
undermine any potential opposition to his leadership. Thus, it is evident that leadership
is fickle. This is especially true in the case of Napoleon, who went from supporting an
ideology, to contradicting it. Parallels to the Russian Revolution are again evident:
Napoleon’s interaction with humans represents Stalin’s negotiating with Germany and
England, which fails.