lOMoARcPSD|3296305

Final Report Marking Criteria

Civil Engineering Project (Swinburne University of Technology)

StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university

Downloaded by Ryan Fernandez (ryan.fernandez@agp.ph)
 lOMoARcPSD|3296305

Swinburne University of Technology

CVE10005 – Civil Engineering Project
Engineering Report - Assessment Criteria

Marks Criteria: Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

Includes only a few of

Includes all of the A few of the expected Includes many of the Contains none of the
Report Structure the elements expected.
5 marks elements expected. elements are missing. elements expected. elements expected.
(individual) AND/OR
Logically organised. Logically organised. Logically organised. Poorly organised.
Poorly organised.
Only a few important
Identified the A few important Includes many of the Inappropriate elements
Design / drawings / elements included.
appropriate elements. elements missing. appropriate elements. identified.
10 marks documentation AND/OR
High quality High quality High quality Poor quality or no
(individual) Poor quality or no
discussion. discussion. discussion. discussion.
discussion.
A few minor errors in Many errors in the Very low level of
Accuracy of your Accurate analysis of A minor error in the
the analysis of the analysis of the issues. accuracy in the
Assessment of the the issues. analysis of the issues.
5 marks issues. AND/OR analysis of the issues.
Important Issues Clear and logical Clear and logical
Clear and logical Poor quality or no Poor quality or no
(individual) description. description.
description. description. description.
A few errors. Many errors. A few errors. Many errors.
Grammar & Spelling Does not limit the Does not limit the Limits the Significantly limits the
5 marks No errors.
(individual) understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
content. content. content. content.
Appropriate Use of Appropriate number Limited number Limited number
Too few references of Too few references of
5 marks References and quality of and/or quality of and/or quality of
poor quality. poor quality.
(individual) references. references. references.
30 marks

Downloaded by Ryan Fernandez (ryan.fernandez@agp.ph)