Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Chanwahn Kim
of THE Indian steel industry Professor, Graduate School of International and Area Studies,
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
indiakim@hanmail.net
tributive or inclusive growth to growth-oriented Modi administration took power in 2014. It has
development. As a result, companies around the remained over 7% since.
world turned keen attention to the Indian mar- As the Chinese economy began to slow apace
ket. In 2016, Apple announced its plan to open a with the recovery of the Indian economy, India
USD 25 million technology development center has been capturing global attention once again.
in Hyderabad. CEO Tim Cook himself made this In the fourth quarter of 2014, India for the first
decision, perceiving India as an important market time overtook China in terms of GDP growth.
for his company over the next decade. Apple is not The Indian government officially announced
alone in viewing the Indian economy positively. that GDP growth surged to 7.5% compared with
Major institutions including the World Bank, China’s 7.3%. Major global institutions including
the Asian Development Bank, IMF, and OECD the World Bank and Goldman Sachs, also began
have issued positive outlooks for the Indian econ- forecasting that India’s GDP growth will surpass
omy. 2017 may prove slower than had been ex- China’s.
pected a year before, but it is still likely to record There is a slim possibility that such high GDP
economic growth over 7%. In the short term, In- growth in India will prove only a temporary phe-
dia’s economic growth seems to be in decline due nomenon. From a structural perspective, India
to the temporary impact of last year’s demoneti- is highly likely to continue to expand at least
zation and the unification of state-by-state value until 2025-30. Unlike China, India’s economically
added taxes into a Goods and Services Tax (GST). active population will continue growing at least
However, in the long term, such changes will until 2025. Currently, half of the 1.3 billion Indi-
prove to have a positive impact. ans are under 25 years of age. The average age in
As seen in Table 1, India’s GDP growth stood the country is 29, far below China’s 37. Naturally,
at 5.5% in 2012-13, but began to pick up as the India is anticipated to enjoy a high demographic
There is a slim possibility that such high GDP growth in India will prove only a
temporary phenomenon. From a structural perspective, India is highly likely to continue
to expand at least until 2025-30. Unlike China, India’s economically active population
will continue growing at least until 2025.
dividend, as the proportion of working people in tors, as stated above, but most of all, it is driven
the total population grows, GDP growth rate ris- by Modi’s “growth-oriented India” project. Upon
es, as suggested by Moody’s. his landslide victory in the general elections of
From a market perspective, India’s economic 2014, his party became the ruling party with a
outlook is fairly bright. Economic growth in the majority of seats in the Parliament and showed a
country is built on domestic demand, contrasting strong will to implement his project.
with China’s pursuit of export-driven growth. To achieve this “growth-oriented India” goal,
This suggests that India is far less vulnerable a series of so-called Modinomics campaigns were
to global economic fluctuations. What is more announced: “Make in India”, “Digital India”, “Skill
important, however, is that the post-reform gen- India”, “Smart Cities”, and “Clean India.” Among
eration will lead India’s domestic market. Unlike these, the key initiative is “Make in India,” which
former generations, the young people in this gen- aims to nurture manufacturing. Prime Minister
eration possess high levels of education and lead Modi has proposed his “3D” mantra for the drive
consumption-oriented lives. to increase foreign direct investment (FDI) in
Falling global oil prices in the initial years of Indian manufacturing. The 3D mantra—Democ-
the Modi administration also contributed to high racy, Demography, and Demand—seems to con-
GDP growth rate in India. With the price decline cern its competitor, China.
in oil , which represent almost 35% of India’s total As Japan and the West hailed this “Make in
imports, current account deficits have plunged India” initiative, FDI in India surged by 35.9%
and overall production costs have declined, but from USD 18.94 billion over the nine months
purchasing power has improved and commodity from October 2013 to June 2014 to USD 25.75
prices have stabilized. This sustained rapid growth billion for the first nine months (October 2014 –
surpassing 7% can be attributed to external fac- June 2015) under the Modi administration. Total
FDI in India continued rising, and reached USD revival of Hindu fundamentalism. Following the
60.1 billion in 2016-17. This increase in FDI is end of the Vajpayee administration in 2004, his
the major breakthrough of Modinomics. How- Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Hindu funda-
ever, underlying the high economic growth are mentalists rapidly declined in power. One deci-
many issues to be addressed. Alongside growth, sive factor was the lack of a nationally popular
the concentration of wealth has been intensified leader from the BJP to succeed Prime Minister
not only by class but also by region, spreading Atal Bihari Vajpayee. To make matters worse, the
economic disparity across the entire society. Brahmin, a caste that traditionally provided loyal
The Modi administration is spurring the cre- supporters to the BJP, turned their back on the
ation of a strong India. The country is showing party.
determination to counter increasing Chinese The reason was quite simple: they were strug-
influence and maximize its interests in terms gling to make a living. Under the BJP and Prime
of defense and security. This has brought about Minister Vajpayee, India enjoyed high GDP
the positive impact that India’s defense has been growth of around 7-8%, but the living standards
promoted, but also side effects in that conflicts of most Hindus, including the Brahmin caste, did
with China have been aggravated and the social not improve due to high inflation. Corporations
welfare budget has been reduced to offset rising and the well-educated middle class deepened their
defense expenditures. pockets, but average religious Hindus found their
living standards unimproved. Therefore, the BJP
was desperate for a leader who could reignite the
Hindu’s India, a double-edged sword for the Hindu base and improve the life of each and every
Modi administration Indian.
The Indian general elections of 2014 marked a Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi,
Figure 1. India’s Hindi Belt and Cow Belt Figure 2. Indian States by Ruling Party
Hindi Belt
Cow Belt
BJP
BJP Alliance
INC
Other
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Democratic_Alliance_(india)
seemed to meet these qualifications and emerged as jority considers the cow to be sacred. Projecting
a hope for reviving the BJP and Hindu fundamen- a strong image of a capacity to realize both the
talism. Taking advantage of the Modi brand, the BJP establishment of a Hindu state and further eco-
won a landslide victory in the 2014 general elections. nomic development, Modi won the hearts of the
Mr. Modi’s image as a hawkish Hindu and an icon of majority of Hindu voters in these north-western
economic development won overwhelming support Indian states.
in the Hindi belt, a linguistic region in north-central Among the 29 states and seven federal terri-
India where Hindi is widely spoken, and the “cow tories (including Delhi) in India, the BJP won 201
belt”, covering most of the Hindi-speaking heartland of its 282 seats (71%) in just seven states falling
of India along with Gujarat and Maharashtra where within the Hindi belt and cow belt. It gained 166
the Hindu fundamentalism is strong and the ma- more seats in the 2014 elections than it had in