Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
Double-kiss culotte bifurcation stenting with
2 long stents in non-left main lesions in acute
3
coronary syndrome setting
8 (Received: April 26, 2017; Revised manuscript received: July 6, 2017; Second revised manuscript received: August 10, 2017;
9 Accepted: August 22, 2017)
11 Abstract: Although various strategies are available, the treatment of true bifurcation lesions has been challenging and controversial. Stenting only
12 the main branch, i.e., single-stent technique, or applying two-stent technique remains the matter of debate. Here, we present three cases with non-
13 left main bifurcation lesions in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. All these patients had significant side branch lesions, which necessitated
14 preserving the side branches. Thus, all were treated with double-kiss culotte technique, and resulted with favorable procedural and post-procedural
15 outcomes with an uneventful 12-month follow-up. However, the prudence in case selection and operator experience is important for successful
16 intervention.
17 Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, complex lesions, coronary bifurcation, drug-eluting stent, percutaneous coronary intervention
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s) 2 Interventional Medicine & Applied Science
Double-kiss culotte stenting
Fig. 1. Representative images of case 1: (A) 1, 1, 1 lesion involving LAD/D1, (B) diffused lesion in proximal LAD and distal LAD, (C) initial
kissing predilation 2.5 × 12 mm (LAD) and 2.0 × 12 mm (D1) Trek balloon, (D) 2.75 × 28 mm Xience Pro in D1 to proximal LAD,
(E) first kissing inflation 3.0 × 12 mm NC Trek, (F) 3.0 × 28 mm Xience Pro in distal to proximal LAD, (G) post-deployment of both
stents, (H) final kissing inflation with 3.0 × 12 mm NC Trek and POT 3.5 × 12 mm NC Trek, (I) final angiogram
163 hypokinesia, moderate LV dysfunction (LVEF: 39%), and 2.5 × 12 mm NC Trek balloon, a significantly large D1 175
164 moderate eccentric MR. He had recurrent angina on was noted, supplying the entire lateral wall of LV that 176
165 minimal activity (CCS class III). CAG revealed a true mandated its preservation. A 3.0 × 40 mm Nostrum 177
166 LAD/D1 bifurcation lesion (Medina class: 1,1,1) with (Envision Scientific Pvt. Ltd., Surat, India) stent was 178
167 subtotal occlusion of LAD and significant disease extend- deployed in D1 and postdilated with 3.5 × 10 mm NC 179
168 ing on either side of the major diagonal (2.5- to 2.75-mm Trek balloon. After rewiring LAD, first kissing inflation 180
169 vessel and dual LAD anatomy) and a dominant LCX. was performed with 3.5 × 10 mm NC Trek balloon in 181
170 Again, a bifurcation strategy with planned two stents was LAD and 3.0 × 10 mm NC Trek balloon in D1. A 3.5 × 182
171 opted. Both the vessels were wired with 0.014″ guide- 40 mm Nostrum stent was deployed in LAD and post- 183
172 wires (Pilot 50 in LAD and BMW in D1) through right dilated with 3.5 × 10 mm NC Trek balloon. D1 was 184
173 femoral route using EBU 7-Fr guiding catheter in a 7-Fr rewired and final kissing inflation was performed with 185
174 sheath. After sequential predilation of both vessels with 3.5 × 10 mm NC Trek balloon in LAD and 3.0 × 12 mm 186
Interventional Medicine & Applied Science 3 ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s)
Sowdagar
Fig. 2. Representative images of case 2: (A) 1, 0, 1 lesion involving LCX/OM1, (B) 3.0 × 32 mm Tetrilimus in OM1 to proximal LCX after
predilation, (C) severe pinching of distal LCX, (D) first kissing balloon inflation with 3.0 × 12 mm NC Trek, (E) 3.0 × 20 mm Tetrilimus
EES from distal to proximal LCX, (F) postdilation of stent in LCX, (G) final kissing inflation with 3.0 × 12 mm NC Trek balloons,
(H) POT 3.5 × 12 mm NC Trek, (I) final angiogram
187 NC Trek balloon in D1. The POT was performed with followed by a final POT with the guidance of stent boost 197
188 3.75 × 12 mm NC Trek balloon subsequently without (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) 198
189 any complications and favorable result was achieved with was performed. The first kissing inflation was performed 199
190 TIMI III flow. This case has been outlined in Fig. 3. after the deployment of the first stent in the more 200
191 Postoperatively, patient was angina-free (CCS class I) and angulated branch and the final kissing inflation was per- 201
192 at 1-month follow-up, his LV function improved (LVEF: formed after the second stent deployment. The TIMI III 202
193 48%) with mild to moderate MR. The patient was flow was achieved in all three cases, without any compli- 203
194 asymptomatic at 1-year follow-up (NYHA class I). cations. Although only three representative cases are 204
195 In all the above complex bifurcation lesions (as per presented, it is in the author’s experience that the first 205
196 DEFINITION criteria [9]), double-kiss culotte stenting, kiss facilitated easy recrossing of the stent struts and final 206
ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s) 4 Interventional Medicine & Applied Science
Double-kiss culotte stenting
Fig. 3. Representative images of case 3: (A) 1, 1, 1 lesion involving LAD/D1, (B) subtotal occlusion of LAD, D1, and dominant LCX, (C) D1
after sequential predilation of vessels, (D) 3.0 × 40 mm Nostrum in D1, (E) first kissing inflation with 3.5 × 10 mm in LAD and 3.0 ×
10 mm NC Trek, (F) 3.5 × 40 mm Nostrum in LAD, (G) final kissing inflation with 3.5 × 10 mm in LAD and 3.0 × 12 mm NC Trek in
D1, (H) POT 3.75 × 12 mm NC Trek in proximal LAD, (I) final angiogram
207 kiss ensured optimal final angiographic result and un- side branch mandated its preservation. As per patients’ 215
208 eventful post-procedural stay. condition and vessel anatomy, we decided to utilize the 216
culotte technique in these patients, instead of the well- 217
known crush or T-stenting approaches. In accordance 218
209 Discussion with these cases, Zheng et al. [10] and Kaplan et al. [11] 219
have previously stated favorability of culotte over crush 220
210 In the present cases, the double-kiss inverse culotte and T-stenting, respectively. Moreover, various trials have 221
211 stenting in true bifurcation lesions located in non-left also proved the efficacy of culotte stenting [1]. 222
212 main vessels has shown favorable procedural and post- The application of double-kiss balloon inflation in all 223
213 procedural outcomes. In all, the side branch was inter- three patients provided easy access to the other branch, 224
214 vened first as the significant disease with long lesions in proper expansion and better apposition of stents. 225
Interventional Medicine & Applied Science 5 ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s)
Sowdagar
226 Correspondingly, literature also states various boons of mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance, abdominal obe- 282
227 double-kissing inflation. The first kissing inflation repairs sity, and dyslipidemia (high triglycerides and low high- 283
228 the distorted geometry, fully dilates the side branch stent, density lipoprotein). 284
229 and prevents ostial side branch stent deformation Yet, only to a minority of patients receive the recom- 285
230 [12, 13]. While the FKBI amends stent distortion and mended reperfusion therapy with fibrinolysis and PCI 286
231 expansion [14], it also decreases late loss and restenosis [<60% and <10% of ST-segment elevation myocardial 287
232 [15]. Studies have recommended FKBI after bifurcation infarction (STEMI) patients, respectively] owing to the 288
233 stenting as it optimizes the clinical outcomes [16, 17] and “gap in care” arising from financial barriers, limited 289
234 provides better results when compared with two-stent health-care infrastructure, poor knowledge, and 290
235 technique without FKBI [18]. accessibility of acute medical services for a majority of 291
236 Previously in a study, Hu et al. [19] had compared its population [24]. 292
237 outcomes after classic culotte and double-kiss culotte The proposed “hub and spoke” model of STEMI care 293
238 stenting, and reported that double-kiss culotte stenting in India [25], where in STEMI patients residing in 294
239 was allied with high procedural success, improved out- villages and small towns, constituting about 80% 295
240 comes and lower major adverse cardiac events up to (non-PCI capable center/spoke hospitals) are thrombo- 296
241 12-month follow-up (22.18% vs. 4.71%; p = 0.001). lysed and shifted to a PCI capable center (hub hospital) 297
242 Comparator studies of double-kiss crush with culotte and in the cities/district headquarters within 3–24 h for 298
243 other techniques have been available [2, 20–22]. Theo- invasive evaluation and management, is both challenging 299
244 retically, crush technique is more likely to cause abnormal and discrepant due to economic and geographic 300
245 change in shear stress compared with culotte, owing to diversities along with infrastructural deficits. About only 301
246 the asymmetrical three-layered crushed metal on the side 20% of the population can afford proper medical care with 302
247 of side branch in the proximal main branch as compared either government-sponsored schemes or private 303
248 with the symmetrical circumferential two-layered metal insurance. 304
249 jacket in the proximal main vessel in culotte stenting.
250 Also, when the bifurcation angle is relatively small, the
251 double-kiss crush presents several limitations, like unsat- Conclusions 305
252 isfied kissing, partial stent coverage in distal side of the
253 side branch and close to the carina, complicated wiring or True, complex bifurcation lesions in non-left main vessel 306
254 rewiring technique, profound stent deformation, or acute can be successfully treated with double-kiss culotte stent- 307
255 stent destruction. ing in patients with ACS. However, the finesse in case 308
256 Double kiss in double-kiss culotte offers the same selection and operator experience is important for suc- 309
257 advantage as double-kiss crush over classical crush. How- cessful intervention. 310
258 ever, a direct comparison study between double-kiss
259 culotte and double-kiss crush in the treatment of true *** 311
260 bifurcation lesions is being conducted, the DK-CULOTTE
Funding sources: No financial support was received for this study. 312
261 I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01735656). The
262 results of this study would further enhance the understand- Authors’ contribution: MAS was responsible for interventional proce- 313
263 ing about the treatment of true and complex bifurcation dure, literature review, drafting of the manuscript, and final approval of 314
264 lesions with two-stent strategy [13]. the version to be published. The author had full access to all the data in 315
265 To the best of our knowledge, no cases of double-kiss the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the 316
accuracy of the data analysis. 317
266 inverse culotte stenting in non-left main vessel have been
267 reported yet in the setting of ACS. However, any tech- Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest. 318
268 nique for bifurcation stenting is not without a downside.
269 The choice of culotte stenting requires proper matching
270 of the size of proximal main branch and side branch, and References 319
271 apt selection of stent such that it undergoes proper
272 expansion to avoid malapposition in main branch [1]. 1. Lassen JF, Holm NR, Banning A, Burzotta F, Lefevre T, Chieffo A, 320
Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, Stankovic G: Percutaneous coronary 321
273 Despite of the probability of incidences of such snags, all
intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: 11th consensus doc- 322
274 the three patients with ACS were successfully intervened ument from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 12, 323
275 by applying double-kiss inverted culotte stenting tech- 38–46 (2016) 324
276 nique, with uneventful follow-up for 12 months. 2. Chen S-L, Santoso T, Zhang J-J, Ye F, Xu Y-W, Fu Q, Kan J, 325
277 The risk of coronary artery disease in Indians is 3–4 Paiboon C, Zhou Y, Ding S-Q: A randomized clinical study 326
comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treat- 327
278 times higher than white Americans, 6 times higher than
ment of coronary bifurcation lesions: Results from the DKCRUSH- 328
279 Chinese, and 20 times higher than Japanese [23]. CAD in II (double kissing crush versus provisional stenting technique for 329
280 Indian occurs 5–10 years earlier than other communities. treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 330
281 Indians also have higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes 57, 914–920 (2011) 331
ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s) 6 Interventional Medicine & Applied Science
Double-kiss culotte stenting
332 3. Favero L, Pacchioni A, Reimers B (2010): Elective double stenting 14. Ormiston JA, Currie E, Webster MW, Kay P, Ruygrok PN, Stewart 385
333 for non-left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Patient selec- JT, Padgett RC, Panther MJ: Drug-eluting stents for coronary 386
334 tion and technique. In: Tips and Tricks in Interventional Therapy of bifurcations: Insights into the crush technique. Cathet Cardiovasc 387
335 Coronary Bifurcation Lesions, eds Moussa I, Colombo A, Informa Interv 63, 332–336 (2004) 388
336 Healthcare, New York, pp. 83–115 15. Latib A, Moussa I, Sheiban I, Colombo A: When are two stents 389
337 4. Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Dell’Avvocata F, Vassiliev D, Daggubati R, needed? Which technique is the best? How to perform? EuroIn- 390
338 Nguyen T, Thang NVV, Foin N: Evaluation of coronary flow tervention 6, J81–J87 (2010) 391
339 conditions in complex coronary artery bifurcations stenting using 16. Biondi-Zoccai G, Sheiban I, De Servi S, Tamburino C, Sangiorgi G, 392
340 computational fluid dynamics: Impact of final proximal optimiza- Romagnoli E: To kiss or not to kiss? Impact of final kissing-balloon 393
341 tion technique on different double-stent techniques. Cardiovasc inflation on early and long-term results of percutaneous coronary 394
342 Revasc Med 18, 233–240 (2017) intervention for bifurcation lesions. Heart Vessels 29, 732–742 395
343 5. Lassen JF, Holm NR, Stankovic G, Lefèvre T, Chieffo A, Hildick- (2014) 396
344 Smith D, Pan M, Darremont O, Albiero R, Ferenc M: Percutaneous 17. Foin N, Torii R, Mortier P, De Beule M, Viceconte N, Chan PH, 397
345 coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: Consensus Davies JE, Xu XY, Krams R, Di Mario C: Kissing balloon or 398
346 from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings. sequential dilation of the side branch and main vessel for provi- 399
347 EuroIntervention 10, 545–560 (2014) sional stenting of bifurcations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5, 47–56 400
348 6. Želízko M, Janek B, Hrnčárek M, Pořízka V, Karmazín V: Percu- (2012) 401
349 taneous coronary interventions in bifurcation lesions: From theory 18. Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, 402
350 to practical approach. Cor et Vasa 54, e176–e187 (2012) Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH: Predictors of 403
351 7. Magro M, Girasis C, Bartorelli AL, Tarantini G, Russo F, long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation 404
352 Trabattoni D, D’Amico G, Galli M, Gómez JA, de Sousa AM: lesions: Importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J 152, 762– 405
353 Acute procedural and six-month clinical outcome in patients treated 769 (2006) 406
354 with a dedicated bifurcation stent for left main stem disease: 19. Hu T, Wang H-C, Wang R-T, Lv A-L, Luan R-H, Li C-X, Cheng 407
355 The TRYTON LM multicentre registry. EuroIntervention 8, H-X, Xia C-H, Tao L: Double-kissing culotte stenting technique in 408
356 1259–1269 (2013) coronary bifurcation disease: Angiographic follow-up and 12- 409
357 8. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, month clinical outcomes. Am J Cardiol 111, 16B (2013) 410
358 Pan M, Burzotta F, Zelizko M, Dudek D, Ludman P: Classification 20. Chen S-L, Xu B, Han Y-L, Sheiban I, Zhang J-J, Ye F, Kwan TW, 411
359 of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: Time for a Paiboon C, Zhou Y-J, Lv S-Z: Clinical outcome after DK crush 412
360 consensus! Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 71, 175–183 (2008) versus culotte stenting of distal left main bifurcation lesions. JACC 413
361 9. Chen S-L, Sheiban I, Xu B, Jepson N, Paiboon C, Zhang J-J, Ye F, Cardiovasc Interv 8, 1335–1342 (2015) 414
362 Sansoto T, Kwan TW, Lee M: Impact of the complexity of bifurca- 21. Zhang J, Chen S: Classic crush and DK crush stenting techniques. 415
363 tion lesions treated with drug-eluting stents: The DEFINITION EuroIntervention 11, V102–105 (2014) 416
364 study (Definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on 22. Chen S-L, Ye F, Zhang J-J, Xu T, Tian N-L, Liu Z-Z, Lin S, Shan 417
365 clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using S-J, Ge Z, You W: Randomized comparison of FFR-guided and 418
366 drug-eluting steNts). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7, 1266–1276 angiography-guided provisional stenting of true coronary bifur- 419
367 (2014) cation lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI trial (double kissing crush 420
368 10. Zheng X-W, Zhao D-H, Peng H-Y, Fan Q, Ma Q, Xu Z-Y, Fan C, versus provisional stenting technique for treatment of coronary 421
369 Liu L-Y, Liu J-H: Randomized comparison of the crush versus the bifurcation lesions VI). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8, 536–546 422
370 culotte stenting for coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Chin Med J (2015) 423
371 129, 505 (2016) 23. Enas E, Garg A, Davidson M, Nair V, Huet B, Yusuf S: Coronary 424
372 11. Kaplan S, Barlis P, Dimopoulos K, La Manna A, Goktekin O, heart disease and its risk factors in first-generation immigrant Asian 425
373 Galassi A, Tanigawa J, Di Mario C: Culotte versus T-stenting in Indians to the United States of America. Indian Heart J 48, 343– 426
374 bifurcation lesions: Immediate clinical and angiographic results and 353 (1996) 427
375 midterm clinical follow-up. Am Heart J 154, 336–343 (2007) 24. Alexander T, Victor SM, Mullasari AS, Veerasekar G, Subramaniam 428
376 12. Chen S, Zhang J, Ye F, Chen Y, Patel T, Kawajiri K, Lee M, Kwan K, Nallamothu BK, Investigators T-SP: Protocol for a prospective, 429
377 T, Mintz G, Tan H: Study comparing the double kissing (DK) controlled study of assertive and timely reperfusion for patients with 430
378 crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Tamil Nadu: The 431
379 lesions: The DKCRUSH-1 Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting TN-STEMI programme. BMJ Open 3, e003850 (2013) 432
380 stents. Eur J Clin Invest 38, 361–371 (2008) 25. Guha S, Sethi R, Ray S, Bahl VK, Shanmugasundaram S, Kerkar P, 433
381 13. Fan L, Chen L, Luo Y, Zhang L, Zhong W, Lin C, Chen Z, Peng Y, Ramakrishnan S, Yadav R, Chaudhary G, Kapoor A: Cardiological 434
382 Zhen X, Dong X: DK mini-culotte stenting in the treatment of true Society of India: Position statement for the management of ST 435
383 coronary bifurcation lesions: A propensity score matching compari- elevation myocardial infarction in India. Indian Heart J 69, S63– 436
384 son with T-provisional stenting. Heart Vessels 31, 308–321 (2016) S97 (2017) 437
Interventional Medicine & Applied Science 7 ISSN 2061-1617 © 2017 The Author(s)