Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Research Briefs


December 19, 2018 | Number 143

Militarization Fails to Enhance

Police Safety or Reduce Crime but
May Harm Police Reputation

By Jonathan Mummolo, Princeton University
s thousands marched in Ferguson, Missouri, Despite a prolonged and vigorous national debate, there
to protest the police shooting of Michael is little systematic evidence demonstrating the consequences
Brown in 2014, many Americans were sur- of militarized police tactics or whether they are more preva-
prised and alarmed by the character of law en- lent in communities of color; because of heterogeneity in
forcement’s response. For days, national news the way thousands of local law enforcement agencies in the
networks broadcast footage of armored vehicles, snipers tak- United States document the presence and activities of their
ing aim at unarmed black and brown civilians, and officers clad militarized units (if they document them at all), the study of
in battle armor deployed by state and local police agencies. police militarization has been hampered by data constraints.
To some people, American police appeared to have sud- In the absence of scientific analysis, the arguments of both
denly transformed into a wartime occupying force—but to advocates and critics are largely informed by anecdotal and
scholars of race and policing (and perhaps to many citizens journalistic accounts. Proponents argue that militarized
of color) these images were less surprising. More than half a police units enhance officer safety and deter violent crime,
century earlier, James Baldwin described urban police as “oc- while critics allege that these tactics are disproportionately
cupying forces” in black communities; decades of research applied in the policing of racial minorities, potentially erod-
in the intervening years have documented the ways in which ing the already anemic levels of trust between citizens and
policing efforts such as “stop-and-frisk” and the “war on law enforcement in highly policed communities. The impli-
drugs” have served to maintain race- and class-based social cations of police militarization for civil rights, public safety,
hierarchies. Partly due to this history, critical race scholars and the exercise of state power depend crucially on the em-
have characterized police militarization as another means by pirical validity of these claims.
which the state exercises social control over racial minorities. My research leverages previously unavailable data to

Editor, Jeffrey Miron, Harvard University and Cato Institute


describe the communities affected by militarized policing feature given the high rate at which militarized police units
and to estimate its effects on crime, officer safety, and public are deployed in black neighborhoods.
perceptions of police. I first use a rare census of SWAT team On average, militarized police units do not appear to
deployments in Maryland to characterize the ways in which provide the safety benefits that many police administrators
militarized police units are used and the characteristics of the claim they do. Police may suffer reputational damage when
communities in which they are deployed. I show that milita- they deploy militarized units. These results suggest that the
rized police units are more often deployed in communities often-cited tradeoff between public safety and civil liberties
with high concentrations of African Americans, a relation- is, in the case of militarized policing, a false alternative.
ship that holds at multiple levels of geography and even after Given the concentration of deployments in communities
controlling for social indicators including crime rates. I then of color, where trust in law enforcement and government
use an original nationwide panel measuring the presence of at large is already depressed, the routine use of militarized
active SWAT teams in roughly 9,000 U.S. law enforcement police tactics by local agencies threatens to increase the his-
agencies, as well as the Maryland SWAT deployment data, toric tensions between marginalized groups and the state,
to test whether militarized policing lowers crime rates and with no detectable public safety benefit. While SWAT teams
promotes officer safety. Using intra-agency comparisons that arguably remain a necessary tool for violent emergency situ-
greatly mitigate concerns over omitted variable bias, I find ations, restricting their use to those rare events may improve
no evidence that obtaining or deploying a SWAT team re- perceptions of police with little or no safety loss.
duces local crime rates or lowers the rates at which officers
are killed or assaulted.
Finally, using survey experiments that randomly assign NOTE:
images of police officers in news reports, I show that seeing This research brief is based on Jonathan Mummolo, “Militari-
more militarized officers—relative to traditionally equipped zation Fails to Enhance Police Safety or Reduce Crime but May
police— can inflate perceptions of crime and depress support Harm Police Reputation,” Proceedings of the National Academy
for police funding and presence. This analysis includes a large of Sciences 115, no. 37, September 11, 2018, http://www.pnas.org/
oversample of African American respondents—an important content/115/37/9181.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Cato Institute, its
trustees, its Sponsors, or any other person or organization. Nothing in this paper should be construed as an attempt to
aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. Copyright © 2018 Cato Institute. This work by Cato Institute is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.