Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
THE REPORT
OF THE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ON THE
" .~
:'!>~J'...;
~~,i;'"'
~. ",we;;.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY
i',·-~~",:,----· __ ·_·_·",;",
...~·- -- .....-
!{..•
'"
f'''\'
CONTENTS
PART I
PTER
I. Introduction Page
1
II. Principles and Policy'
4
Ill. Revision of Lists
12
IV. General Recommendations
V. Appreciation 23
25
PART II
fl/DIX
I
I
1. List of Orders in force under articles 341 and 342 of the
Constitution i
28 I
n. Resolution constituting the Committee
29 I
UI. List of persons iwho appeared .before the Committee
!
31
IV. List of Communities recommended for inclusion
39
V. List of Communities recommended for exclusion
I
42
\7J. List of proposals rejected by the Committee
55
I
Yu.Revised Statewise lists of Scheduled Castes and
I
Scheduled Tribes
.. 62-115 i
J
~~"f~:~
~.;'.'
I I
!
.~- ........•..
~ .h·'_~ ....
_.~ __ 0_. __ .•.• __ ~-_
CONTENTS OF APPENDDC/ll
f~ndhL! h<.;C0ih
r\'S,~an~
Bih",r
Gujm'at
j'nmnlU &. ~<~\,;hl1lir
Kentla
Madhya Pmd0sh
M"dr<~s
M,dlara,; IW';j
!vlysore
~·~r'~g.b.l:.\[)d
Ori.~sc,
PART 1
FLlnj:,b
9"'d;:;scli~~:-j
Ututr Pri"\'CL.;.SI"·
W';SL BengiOl
I: .\
~ij)
J,
l
CHAl>TEll I
INTRODUCfION·
2. The lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes appear- from organisations as w~II as individual members of the public,
ing in the various Orders came up for criticism on a number of including members of Legislatures and social workers, and the
occasions both in Parliament and ou~ide on the ground that Committee felt it would be desirable to examine these represen-
they were not rational and contained several anomalies. Assurances tations to the extent possible; this additional responsibility under-
were given on behalf of the Government that a further revision taken by the Commi~tee made its task more onerous.
of the lists would be undertaken in consultation with the State
Governments and others and an attempt would be made to ~ The task of the Committee involved the examination ,of the
rationalise the lists. A number of representations were received historical and scientifie background of over eight' hundred ~iDal
by the Government of India and the views of the Governments communities and caste groups and assessment of their social,
of the various States and Union Territories were invited thereon; educational and economic conditions with a view to determining
they were also requested to make their own suggestions, if any. their eligibility to be specified in the lists of Scheduled Castes and
After a preliminary examination of the resultant proposals received Scheduled Tribes.
from the States and Union Territories, this Committee was appoint-
ed by a Resolution of the Government of India in the Department 5. With the object 9f collecting as much material and acquaint-
of Social Security, dated the 1st June, 1965 (Appendix II), ing itself with as many viewpoints as possible within the short
with the following terms of reference ;- time available, the Committee visited almost all the State capitals
and held extensive discussi,ons with the officers and experts, of ~
( 1) To advise on the proposals received by Government the Governments of the various States and Union Territories,
for revision of the existing lists of Scheduled Castes and Sche- some Members of Parliament and State Legislatures, social workers,
duled Tribes.
social scientists and available represen~ationists; wherever possi-
(2) To advise whether, where a caste or a tribe is listcd ble, the Committee also ascertained the views of the Chief
as a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe in relation to a Ministers and Ministers in charge of the welfare of backward
particular area in a State or an Union Territory, members of classes in the States. The Committee was assisted in these discus-
that caste or tribe residing- sions byTribes.
D.eputyThe
Commis\ljoJlCIS.-.aLScheg!lt~. C~~~_s._~he-
<luled -Committee had11le benefit of personal
(i) in other areas within the same State or Union Terri- discussions with the Registrar General of Census, the Conunis-
tory, or sioner for Schedu led Ca&tes and Scheduled Tribes and' -their
(ii) in other States or Union Territories , representatives. A list of persons with whom discussions'w~re
should be recognised as belonging to the Scheduled Caste or held appears at Appendix III. The Committee drew extensively
from the standard works of reference on castes and tribes by
Scheduled Tribe, as the case may be.
rccogllised authorities likc Ibbetson, Thurston, Russell and
The Resolution observed that the present lists of Scheduled Castes Hinlla), Aiyappan, lyer and Nanjundaiya, and also rCCerced,
and Scheduled Tribes did not show a uniform pattern and several wherever n~cessary, to old census publications and' Distrkt
Gazetteers. ,.: .
,
anomalies had been brought to the notice of Government and
th~t it was therefore very necessary that'the lists of Sch~duled ,." ..,:.
:1 '
Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be revised "in a rational "~'~',
... ~
and scientific manner". The Committee was expected to submit
the report within three months of the datc of the Resolution.
:i / ; ~
1', .•1.
ill
3. The Resoluti~~ required the Committee to advise only on
~ the proposals received by Government.. But on the announce-
I: ment of the constitution of the Committee, a large number of
:!
representations were received by the Committee directly-they
continued to pour in even while this report was being drafted-
~:
\1
I'
'i
II
"
'Whose ~tI1ainobject is to secure or retain a place in the lists of duled Tribes until they rise to the average stratum; of'l*iety, we
"Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The motivation for regret to note that the listing of: th*·castesand tribesl'JIas1·more
tbeigrowthof such .organisations arises from what may be called or less created vested interests· and has -tended to damp>-kHsome
tbe 'very attractive "package deal" of special facilities and bene- extent personal effort and' enterprise to improve one's positiOn and
fits that are provided for communities included in the Schedules. fortune. Inclusion in the lists is regarded more as a'e<JVeted
tTheD;lore ;advanced communities regard the reservation of seats prize than as a reflection of backwardness. While a large number
ill! the Legislatures as the most attractive of these facilities; consi- of requests for inclusion in the lists were pressed before us, we
derable interest is also displayed in the reserved seats in Pancha- had only 'one instance of a request for exclusion from the lists on
yati iRaj institutions at .various levels, and seats in other .local the ground that inclusion in the lists operates as a stigma. 'The
bodies. One Scheduled Caste political leader from a northern Constitution does. not provide for the total liquidation··.of ".these
State said candidly that he would be, prepared to forego economic lists at any time out prominent social workers, political· leaders
and other development benefits if special political rights were outside the fold of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
guaranteed, because once political rigqts were acquired, anything and a large number of officials whom we met in the course of
tlJey desired would follow. The really backward communities, our inquiry asserted that, in the interests of national -integration
however, look forward to the reservations and other facilities for and in view of the changes which have taken place during the
recruitment to the services, educational concessions and benefits last 15 years, the time has come to do away gradually withl·these
of economic development schemes, and are not concerned with privileged classes, particularly in view of the increasing.·demand
political privileges. for inclusion therein, and to organise developmental 'sChemes
without reference to castes or tribes. The least thatsho'ltlld be
done, we were told, is to fix a time limit for the currency of the \
./14. various
.....-6f-the It has been
benefits
in evidence
and concessions
for someearmarked
time that for
a lion"s
the Schc-
share lists. In any case, the consensus of opinion expressed before us
'<luled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is appropriated by the numeri- has been that the emphasis should be on the gradual elimination
·cally larger and politically wen organised communities, The of the larger and more advanced communities from these lists,
'SIJlaller and more backward ~~l!l..!!!!!I!ities to get 16st'-
have te.I.1:d.t::~L , and on focussing greater attention on the really backward sec-
.in de~~r:~t!~_,P!-o~~§s~§, thou&.1L~~~t ~eserY~I!g ..~_f.~peCi~1aiel .. tions, preferably by applying an economic yardstick.· IMter
TfiOillni.there ..lS.n.~ escape from the larger ana politIcally more considering the observations of the Commissioner for SChedule
.conscious groups asserting themselves in the political field, it Castes and Scheduled Tribes in his Reports for the years 1956-57
'appears to us that, in matters of planning and development, and 1957-58, an authoritative pronouncement in the matter has
<listribution of benefits needs to be focussed on the more back- been made by the Estimates Committee in its Fortyeighth Report
ward and smaller groups on a selective basis. At one stage we for the year, 1958-59 as.follows :-
thought of suggesting separation of political rights from develop-
mental benefits but we are not making the suggestion since the "While the Committee consider that it is desirable that
political reservations are due to disappear shortly and since the preference be given to the less advanced among the Scheduled
idea cannot also be implemented within the present framework Castes and Scheduled Tribes in provision of all facilititfs, they
()f the 'Constitution. We would, instead, suggest that the various would like to observe that the tendency on the part of <some
-c4stes ;and tribes in the lists should be administratively classified castes and tribes to get themselves listed as backward merely
or categorised so as to give higher priority in planning and deve- to get concessions is undesirable and must be discouraged. In ""~~,
lopment to the more needy, and lower priority for the compara- this connection, the Committee would like to reproduce! below
an extract from the Report of the Commissioner for ..'Scbe-
been able to make the classification or categorisation and we duled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for 1956-57:-
'~eave the task to Inbe view
\ #yely advanced. undertaken by the Department
of the limitation of time, we Qf Social
have not
'Backwardness has a tendency to perpetuate ,itself·,and
those who are listed as backward try to remain as;,sucb,
15. While we appreciate the necessity of providing special due to vari0l!s concessions and benefits they derive, and
thus backwardness becomes a vested interest.'
\ '-security in for
assistance the uplift with
consultation of the
the Scheduled Castes and the Sche-
State Governments.
\ 4
.,
.f~--~~·· -.-.-. -.....--.-
t:
j.;
;'1
10 11
.. '. 107. The Cominissioner has suggested in his Report for :State Caste Tribe
""'1'957-58 that if the" ultiin~te 'goal of classless and casteless
,·;::society is to be attained, the list of Scheduled Castes aad Andhra Pradesh Mala
':; 'Scheduled Tribes and even of Other Backward Classes will Assam. Jhalo-malo Jaintia
Jalia Kaibartta Kachari
".have to be reduced from year to year and replaced in due Dhupi Khasi
course by a list based on the cp.teria of .Income-cum-Merit. Kuki
Mizo (Lusei)
;, . Keeping in view the above recommendation and the Bihar . Chamar
Dhobi
, rt?<luirements of article 46 of the Constitution, which cast
'Gujarat VankaT
:jspecial 'responsibility of safeguarding the interests of the weaker
sections of society especially Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Kcrala . Vannan
Mannan
\,
Tribes, the Committee recommend that weaker sections of Perumannan
. society should be defined and criteria for special assistance Velan
laid down on the basis of economic status and educational and Madhya Pradesh . Chamar Bhilala
social backwardness. This would result in larger and larger Jatav Rajgond
Satnami
;sections of so<;iety' passing out of the category requiring Mahar
special assistance and enable them to attain social equality, Madras Mannan
while safeguarding the interests of those who are still in need Velan
of such special assistance." Vannan
Maharashtra . Mahar Mahadeo Koli
,
, In forwarding the Report of the Scheduled Areas and Scheduled Kokna
Tribes Commission, the Chairman of the Commission stated : Mysore Bhovi
Nagaland Kachari
""Amongst tribals also we have been able to notice four Kuki
Naga
Vifferent layers----:-wefee~ th~t ~t the base of these four .layers
. IS the class of tnbals WhIChIS III an extremely underdeveloped Orissa . Dhoba Bhottada
i' Bhumia
stage, and, at the topmost levels among the tribals is the layer
which can well afford to forego any further help." Punjab Chamar
Uttar Pradesh Chamar
I"
I" The Study Team on Social Welfare of Backward Classes has Dhobi
I
I expressed the following views: West Bengal Dhoba
Namasudra
I: "The central idea is to introduce a gradation in the pattern Rajbanshi
'of assistance to make sure that those economically les~ Sunri
advanced among them get proportionately higher benefits than
those which are somewhat better off." .'\..
17. Some of the State Governments concerned, however, do ''''~~
..~.,..
not favour exclusion of these commun.ities from !he lists; strong
I 16. In view of the weighty views expressed above and in the representations have also been made by or on behalf of the affect-
,
I
, intetestS' of national integration, we feel that the time has come ,cd communities for their retention. Some of the communities arc
when the question of descheduling of relatively advanced com- in strategi¢ border areas. In these circumstances and also as .wc
munities should receive serious and urgent c.onsideration. have not been able to make a closer investigation into the condi-
Consistently with this approach, several persons who appeared tions of these communities in the short time at our disposal, we
before us, including some eminent social workers, brought the are unable to make a specific recommendation in regard to these
following communities to our notice, which, in their opinion, are communities.
relatively advanced and could forthwith be descheduled: - ---.
..
. ,_.!:,~p~ptt.<!~_SS(?~2 ._".__ .n'_
"
13
f/!
jJi:.
~;;
i:
on social mobility as the communities concerned would confine
themselves to the specified areas lest they lose the special privileges
and benefits by moving out. It is rightly pointed out that, J
CHAPTERIII consistenly with the policy of social integration, the tribes in ='
particular should be encouraged to abandon their isolation and
REVISION OF LISTS freely intermix with the rest of the population. Another
argument, which has considerable force, is that as a result of the
18. Our general approach in reviewing the existing lists ha spread of education, many boys and girls of the Scheduled Castes
and the- Scheduled Tribes who have attained secondary or univer.;.
been brought out in the preceding Chapter; at the present transi
tional stage in the social structure, it is just not possible or eve! sity levels of education have, in the absence of adequate educational
facilities nearer theif homes, to migrate to regional . cities .Qr
desirable to evolve a completely uniform pattern for the lists c
various States and Union Territories. The scope for th State headquarters or even outside the State to prosecute studies
in higher educational institutions of their choice. We are happy
rearrangement of the lists in a rational and scientific manner i to report that every State and Union Territory in India has.
also limited. The case of each caste and tribe has to b
examined in detail on its own merits and in relation to .~ appreciating these considerations, agreed to removal of the area
restrictions generally.
l~~_faf!.ors
the cOOIftry.· prevalent in different parts
-- ('
22. In some States, however, there are two social1y distinct
communities bearing the same name, but only one of them has,
been found to be deserving of inclusion in the list. There are
also a few cases where members of an ~ological group residing
19. The present lists of Schedule Castes and Scheduled Trib( in certain areas of a State have to De included in the list, but
have been drawn up separately for each State and Union Terr members of the same group residing in the remaining areas of a
tory. In the lists for many States, such Assam, Madhya Pradesl State are not eligible for such inclusion. In these two situations.
Maharashtra and Kerala, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribt we are constrained to maintain the principle of area restrictions.
have been specified with reference to certain localities (usual! Fortunately, such cases are few and, by and large, we have been
Districts or Tchsils) within the State. The result is that [ able to remove area restrictions. It may incidentally be mentioned
person can legally be regarded as a member of a Scheduled Casl that specification of castes and tribes in the lists with area
or a Scheduled Tribe for the purposes of the Constitution unle restrictions has been held by the Supreme Court not to be ultra
he belongs to the listed caste or tribe, and also resides in t1 vires the Constitution (vide, Bhaiyalal v. Harikishan Singh and
specified localities within the aforesaid States. This has no doul Ors: Civil Appeal No. 765 of 1964, decided on the 5th Febr:uary.
led to anomalous results: members of the same caste or tribe froJ 1965: Unreported).
the ethonological or social point of view are deprived of the sped
privileges and benefits merely because they reside in differeJ 23. In the few cases where it has been founA necessary to
States or different parts of the same State. retain area restrictions, we have been informed that hardship is
20. This anomaly has its origin in the lists prepared undl not
the likely tl? be caused.
prescnbed ~o students
localItIes persuing
as, even at higher'studies o~tside_.
present, educatfOblf.-
the Government of India Act, 1935. The territorial restrictiOl concessions and scholarships have been extended to such students
were then probably introduced either because the social disabil by the issue of administrative instructions. Wherever possible,
ties attached to certain castes and tribes were appreciably mOl we have also reduced the limiting effect of area restrictions by
distinctive in particular localities or because certain castes all adopting a new formula for listin~ the tribe or caste in question.
tribes were found to be concentrated in appreciable numbers onl For eAample, where we have said "Caste A of District X", a
in the specified localities. member of Caste A hailing from District X would be eligible to
be treated as belonging to a Scheduled Caste throughout the
21. There has been considerable criticism, both within Parti; State.
ment and outside, that such "area
12 res,rictions" operate as a c1<
;flr
14 15
I
satisfy the criteria, and have in the past been somehow over-
whether , instead of Statewise lists, there should. be an all-India looked. Such cases are listed at Appendix IV.
list of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tnbes. From the
Constitutional point of view, such an all-India list is not feasible; Exclusions
:articles 341 and 342 require specification of castes and tribes
"'with .resp~ct to any ~tate ~r Union Territory" and envisage 26. A certain number of exclusions, as indicated in Appendix
~tatewlse hs~s. Accordmgly, If a member of a caste schedu~e~ V, most of which were proposed by the State Governments
In State A migrates to State B, h~ cannot ~c regarded a~ bclongll1g themselves, have been agreed to; these communities, we are
to a Scheduled .Cast~ unless hiS caste IS scheduled In State :8 satisfied, had previously been included by mistake, and do not
also. The speCificatIon of that caste as ~ .Scheduled Caste 10 answer to the basic criteria. The State Government had very
State B would depend upon the local conditIons. However, the little local information regarding some of the tribes and castes
situation is not so serious as to call for an amendment of~hc when the lists were originally drawn up in 1950 and revised in
Constitution. We have. found that, apart from tea plantation 1956. It is only during the past five or six years, after the
labour and displaced persons from Pakistan, whose cases arc Tribal Research Institutes were established, that they were able
considered separately later in this report, the inter-State mobility to gather data. The Government of Orissa have proposed
of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has exclusion of seven tribes from the list; the proposal has been,.
not so far been of mass dimensions and is restricted to individuals. however, stoutly opposed, particularly by two members of
It often happens, however, that a few tribal communities inhabit Parliament. '!he Commissioner for ~chedule4 Cas~ and
a hill or a forest region, part of which falls within one State and Sch~dule? ~nbe~ has rec~ended th~Ir exclUSIOn, while ~e
part in another adjoining State. In such cases, we have made SOCialSCIentists lD. the RegIstrar-General s office fee~ that w!tile
sure that the lists of Scheduled Tribes of both such States include these are bor:der-line cll;SCs,th~y would favour theIr reten!10n.
I the names of these communities if they are found in appreciable We have gamed the ImpressIon that two. of these trlbeS~
I
'i numbers on both sides of border. Among the Scheduled Castes, BHan:ADA an~ Bfl.UMIY A, are comparattvely advanced, .but
.there are certain migrant communities such as PRADHI and not ~avll~g suffiCient tim~ ~o ~ake a close. study of these tnbes
SANSI, which already figure in the lists of all the States where and lD VIew of the confl}CtiDgIdeas expr~ssed. before us, we are
they are found in appreciable numbers; similarly, members of unable t.o. make a speCific recommendation m reg~ to these
/';
me sweeper class are scheduled throughout India under various commuDIties.
1;'<
h :sy~onyms. Students of the Scheduled Cas~es and Scheduled 27. We found a number of communities in the Schedul~~
i Tnbes from some of the ~aste~ States, pa!tJcula~ly .As~am a~d of each State, for which no population was returned at the 1961 ...~.
f'l Nagaland, have to .study 10 higher ed1!cahonal lDstlt.UtIonS In Census. We have taken out of the lists such communities after
1/ -other States; but thiS has not resulted lD ~y hardship because verifying, in consultation with the State Governments, that these
the State concerned sponsors and finances Its students, though communities have not in fact come to the notice of the local
·studYi?g in othe~ States. We ~re, therefa:e, of the opinion t~at administrators. Most State Governments have also agreed that
there IS no pressmg need for domg away With the present practice tribes and castes not found in viable numbers should be removed
..of Statewise listin~ of Scheduled Castes and S~heduled Tri~cs, from the lists. In the case of a Scheduled Tribes, it may be
though the practice docs operate as a handIcap to a few safely assumed that tribal characteristics cease to exist when the
individuals __ nd •• __ • __ • J.liLm.b.~LQLlriJ?als lJvitlgJIlll Stat~)sIe~~ Jpan 100, the more so
if even this small number is spread over several districts. To
I
Ii:
1,1'
16 17
cite an example, the population returned' in the State of Madras tribes to any significant extent because of their relatively-small
for the KONDA REDDI tribe was 8. Of this, 3 were working numbers, and their tendency to be constantly on the mo.ve; It'
as labourers in Madras city, while the rest were spread over two is also clear that while these communities may possess some of
other, districts. It would be reasonable to infer in such cases the characteristics usually associated with the Scheduled caStes
that these small groups have got aSSimilated with the genera! and Scheduled Tribes, the dominant factors which govem their
population; in any case, it would be very difficult administratively life are their anti-social heritage and tendency to move from
to trace these individuals with a view to afford them special place to place in small groups. We are inclined to feel that it
assistance. As for education, no hardship is likely to be caused would be in the best interests of these communities if they' are
because of the introduction of free and compulsory education. taken out from the lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
and treated exclusively as a distinctive group, with development
28. In the case of the Scheduled Castes, social disabilities schemes specially designed to suit their dominant characteristics.
arising from the traditional practice of untouchability are likely However, it was brought to our notice that some of the denotified
to be felt even if the population of an affected community within communities such as BAGRI and PASI have, during the past ten
a State is less than 100. It is, however, obvious that if there years, settled down to normal agriculture and deserve to be
is a cominunity with a population of less than 10 scattered in treated differently from other communities such as the KANJAR
various paits of a State, there is no justification for regarding it who still have an affinity for crime and flair for nomadic i life.
:as a community, and the disabilities arising out of untouchability Again, the tendency towards crime and, to a lesser extent, the
would in practice be non-existent. We have, therefore, adopted nomadic trait, apparently varies from one community to another;
a population of 10 as the minimum limit in each State for any it is also said that the small number of some of the denotified
co~imity continuing in the list of Scheduled Castes. As in the communities who still resort to crime have to be treated differently
case of the Scheduled Tribes, no hardship is likely to be caused from other members of the same community who are inclined to
on this account. settle down peacefully. In the absence of adequate information,
and due to the limitation on our time, we are not in a position to
1(
I~: :I '
VVeiotified
29. In and Nomadic
the lists Tribes
of almost every State, the names of several
'denotified tribes' and 'nomadic tribes' have been included, some
in the list of Scheduled Tribes and some in the list of Scheduled
decide on merits the cases of individual communities .. We
have, therefore, no option but to maintain the status quo,ante.
We suggest that the present anomalous position regarding the
denotified and nomadic tribes, who could more properly be
~\>
"
J""", "
identified as yommunities rather than tribes, should be rectified
Castes. We found that the same tribes-it would be more as soon asA50ssible after a detailed investigation.
scientific to refer to them as communities-have also been often
t: jncluded in the administrative lists of denotified and nomadic DispI
I':.:"
v
Ji'
I tribes maintained by the State Governments for special treatment.
Another anomaly is that the same community (for example, 30. A considerable number of displaced persons whO' have
PARDHI) is listed as a Scheduled Tribe in one State (e.g., come over to India from East Pakistan during the past Jive' years
Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra), while in a neighbouring consist of members of castes which are scheduled in weSt Bengal. .
St~te (e.g., Rajasthan) it is listed as a Scheduled Caste. This Most o( them are NAMASUDRAS, with a sprinkling of other·""
anOri1al~us classification appears to have had its origin in the castes such as RAJBANSHI, SUNRI, CHAMAR and fisherinen:""~~ >
fact., that members of the denotified and nomadic communities 'fhey ~ave been resettled in agricultural colonies newly, estab- .~,
posses:s a.;complex combination of tribal characteristics, traditional l13hed III the States of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maha-
untpu~hability, nomadic traits, and an anti-social heritage. We rashtra, Orissa etc. The largest. settlements , are in ,Danda-
find t~at no special and detailed study of these communties has karanya. Most of these settlements are in the heart of tribal
been und,ertaken during the past fifteen years; our discussions areas. Investigations conducted by, the Assistant Commissiciners
with 'the State Governments, however, revealed that the type of for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in various' States
development schemes usually, designed for Scheduled Castes and indicate that, in view of their concentration in view surrollildings
Scheduled Tribes have not benefited the denotified and nomadic and close association with other, displaced persons" l s.ocial
-..,", .':. ••.•;<,d:I*. ··~j;a~ ••'~'li..,;.,' ,'. ,.,.~,~.----.--- ._.~.'-
(j;'
"
Jj:
18 19
disabilities arising from untouchability are practically non- reported that settlers in the tea estates have tended to lose their
existent as between the various communities of displaced persons tribal characteristics in the new surroundings, and that special.
on the one hand, and as between them and the neighbouring educational assistance is already being extended to them.
indigenous population on the other. Again, as displaced persons.
these communities are receiving substantial benefits under rehabi- Scientifi!: Grouping of Communities
litation schemes, on a scale better than those normally afforded 34. Hitherto, no systematic attempt appears to have been.
made to list castes and tribes in the scheduled according to:
I circumstances,
i enforce a castewedistinction
consider that
amongst
it WOUld,
displaced
be a persons
retrograde
whostep
have
to generic names, synonyms and sub-groups. With the cooperation.
II taken
have
to a new way of life. All the State Governments concerned
supported this Castes
to the Scheduled view. in the States concerned. In these
,.:.
,
20 21
.This view is reiterated in the subsequent decision in Bhaiyalal v. very high-44 per cent in the case of Moo (Lusei) .. The Uibal
.Harikishan Singh and others (sppra). The present lists enl.lme- areas of Assam have been excluded from the operation of the
rate some synonyms, sub-castes and sub-tribes only, either normal laws, including those relat~g to taxation. Vast amounts
separately or under the main caste or tribe, but in the light of have been invested for cconOlD1Cdevelopment. The average
these rulings, it would be necessary to include in the lists of economic level of a tribe of these areas is generally admitted 10
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes a comprehensive com- be much higher than that in a comparable area elsewhere in the
pendium of all local synonyms, phonetic variations, sub>-castes .country. Politically, these tribes are fully conscious.
i and sub-tribes for each caste and tribe. It would indeed be a
i
,difficult-nay, well-nigh impossible-task to prepare exhaustive 40. For some years, the N agas have tended to consolidate
lists of all sub-groups and synonyms. It is to be noted that the their ranks' in the case of the kukis, however, a splintering
names by which certain groups and sub-groups are known vary tendency h~s been noticeabl~~sub-gro.u.ps ~d even <;l~ns wish
from district to district and even from area to area within a to establish themselves as dlst10ct entitIes 10 the polItIcal and
district. Moreover, there is a tendency for castes and sub- ;social structure.
,groups to give themselves new and fanciful names from time to
time, and resent being called by any other name. As a result of 41. In Assam, it has been the practice, because of the Sixth
our enquiries, we have added the local names of the more impor- Schedule to the Constitution, to discriminate between the Sche-
tant groups and sub-groups, but to get over the difficult resulting .duled Tribes of the hill areas and those of the plains districts;
from the rulings of the Supreme Court, we suggest that in modi- the five year development plans have a distinc.t bias in favour ?f
fying the Orders under articles 341 and 342, it should be provided the hill tribes in spite of the fact that the educatIonal and economic
expressly that a caste or a tribe specified in the list shall be deemed levels of the plains tribals are admit!edly muc.h lo~e~ than those
to include all its synonyms, phonetic variations, sub-castes and of hill tribes. In Tripura, the social group1Og IS 10 a settled
, sub-tribes . state and the problems there are related not so much tOi:ribals
.as to the displaced persons migrating from East Pakistan.
!;:: 36; There was a heterogeneous mixture of singular and
plural terminology in the existing lists. To the extent possible, 42. It is clear that in the educational, political, social and
we have uniformally adopted the masculine singular terminology. ,economic fields, many of the tribes in Nagalan~, Manipur and, in
i:- most of the hill districts of Assam have attamed levels which
I,
I; The Tribes of Assam and the Eastern border States ,cannot be reached by the other tribes of India for many years to
j:
, . , ,come; comparison between them is, therefore, ruled o~t. At
I' 37. The Sl,xth ,Sc~edule to the ConstitutIon affords a spec~al one stage, we thought it would be useful to have the ,tnbes ~n
i' 'st~tus to the hIll dlstncts of Assam, and the North East Frontlcr the eastern borders listed separately. Howe,ver, Wf; feel that m
Agency. The Union Territory of Manipur has tribal cemmuni-: view of the unique features of these border areas, it will not be
ties which are akin to those in Nagaland and adjoining, areas of advisable, at the present stage, to embark on such a me~sure,
~ssam .. Geographically,. these .areas are situated a~ong th.e We held a joint meeting with rep~esentatives from ~S'SaI1l,Npf A
mternatlOnal b~rders with. Pakistan, Burma and ChllJa; thiS Nagaland and Manipur to examme whether the lI~s pertal~l~p
endows them With a strategic complex, to these States and areas could be mutually coordmated. f~'
. ' .. ,. ' representatives of NEFA and Nag~land indicated that .specifi:.:a-~~
, 38. Promlllent amongst the ~rlbes mhabltIng the area arc the tion of individual tribe3 or sub-tnbes would cause dIfficulties;
Lusei . (Miz~), N aga .a~~ Kukt;groups of the same .tribes arc they urged the adoption of a general discription-"all in~igeno~ls
_also. found III the adjOInIng tnbal areas of East Pak\stap and tribes of NEFA" and "all tribes of Nagaland". As article 342
Burma,. , " ' of the Constitution requires the specification of "tribes or tribal
, ' ,communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal com-
_ 39. ~or .about a century, foreign relig(oys missions ~ave munities", a general descri~tio~ of the type suggested above. is
,been actIve I~ t~ese ~r~as .and from the Bntlsh. days the tribes 'likely to raise legal complIcatIOns. The ~ssa~ representatIve
have been en]oymg dIstinctIve treatment. The hteracy~-<U"e ..··."~r-esse4- himself -generally-~n favour of-specification of the larger
:-,-,-,~[~;i'.)~t~ ••.. "'~:."",.i.~ ....J..-..,..:._
~ ..'-::';';;';'.- •. : _..c;~. .......o...._ .•. ,_. __ •• _ .• __ .~,~.~. --~._-------
If
i
J (
Ii..
..0'_';: :p
22
J '
groups and removal of the area restrictions for the hills and
\\
,I
.' plains tribes; he was, however, unable to commit his Government CHAPTER IV
to these views.
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
43. In view of this highly complex situation, the Committee-
has been obliged to revise and coordinate the lists on the basis; 46. In revising the lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
of available facts rather than ideological considerations. Tribes, we have excluded some castes and tribes. These excluded
~astes and tribes are already enjoying certain educational,
Rejections -economic and other developmental benefits. We are of the
view that they should not be deprived of these benefits abruptly;
44. We had to reject certain proposals for inclusion of some- in particular, we consider that members of these castes and tribes
castes and tribes in the lists. A list of such castes and tribes whe are participating in scholarship schemes should not be
appears at Appendix VI. We are not satisfied, for various suddenly denied their scholarship benefits, thereby compelling
reasons, that these castes and tribes should be given a place in them to give up their education. We would recommend that the
the lists. benefits enjoyed by the excluded castes and tribes should be
gradually withdrawn in a phased manner.
Revised Lists
47. There !lre some communities which, though not strictly
44-A. The complete list of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled eligible to be treated as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes,
Tribes, as revised by us, appears at Appendix VII. deserve special assistance. It would not be sufficient to treat
them merely as "Other Backward Classes" as they require larger
Effect on Population aid than is provided to Other Backward Classes. The com-
j"
munities which we have in mind are the Gujjar, Gaddi and
45. We have tried to assess the effect of our revision of the Banjara communities.
lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on their recorded'
population. According to the 1961 Census, the populati·:>n of 48. In the course of the revision of the lists, we have at
Scheduled Castes was approximately 65 millions and that of the times adopted local names and synonyms and altered the spelling
Scheduled Tribes about 30 millions. (Incidentally, both these of some castes and tribes. These nominal changes should not
together constitute over 21 per cent of the total population of affect continuation of privileges and benefits to those castes and
J ndia.) After taking into consideration the population of castes tribes subjected to such changes. It would be for the State
and tribes excluded from the revised lists, and on an estimate of Governments to ensure that the castes and tribes whose names
the population of castes and tribes added to these lists, there will are altered in the revised list are not denied th6 ..benefits they
not be any appreciable change in the population of the Scheduled were previously entitled to. The State Governments should be
Castes, while the population of Scheduled Tribes will increase
by a little less than two millions. advised
rities..•..•to issued necessary instructions to the appropriate a-q~-_ ...•. ""'.
24
(B. N. LOKUR)
'.. Chairman
, ..
,.' ~.
.•.
(A. D. PANDEf'",~~,
Member
(N. SUNDARAM)
Member-Secretary-
f"I
I ,
~ I
iii"i
v.I I
'0 I
1
i
I
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX n
No. F.12j3j65-Scr. IV
List of Orders in force under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution Government lof' India
Department' of Social ,Security
1. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950.
New ,Delhj, the!lst June... J965
2. The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.
RESOLUTION
3. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) (part C States) Order, 1951.
The Government of India have had under consideration for some time
4. The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) (Part C States) Order, 1951.
the question of revising the lists of scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. '
s. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) The present lists do not show a uniform pattern, and several anomalies'
Act, 1956.
hav~ boon brought to notice. It is, therefore, very necessary that the lists
of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be revised in a rational
and scientific manner.
6. The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Lists (Modification) Order,
1956. ',. I ;" ' ; l, \;'" \ • 2. 'Proposals for revision of the lists have been received from various
7. The Constitution (Jammu and :Kashmir) ,Scheduled Castes Order, States and Union Territories. I A p.reliminar, examination of these propo-
1956. i.' I , ' , I i I I !' sals has boon completed and it has been found that-there-are-several--con-
tfOvecsial issues which require to be settled. The Government of India
8. The Constitution (Andaman and JNicobar Islands) Scheduled Tribes hav,}therefore decided to set up an Advisory Committee on the Revision
Order, 1959. I ' I • Ii:' . of lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, :with the following terms
of ,reference :-
9. The Bombay ,Reorganisation Act, 1960. (1) ;To ,advise on the proposals received by Government for revision
of the existing lists of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
10. The Constitution (Dadra and ,Nagar Haveli) Scheduled Castes" Order,
W~ . (2) To advise whether, where a caste or a tribe is listed.as a Scheduled
Caste or a Scheduled Tribe in relation to a particular 8:f{la is a State
11. The Constitution (Dadra and Nagar Haveli) Scheduled Tribes Order, or a Union Territory, members of that caste or tribe residing ~
1962. ,
(i) in (other-areas withia-the·sll.m6·-State-o~erritory:-or
12. The Constitution (Pondicherry) Scheduled Castes Order, 1964. (ii) ,in other States or Union Territories should be recognised as be-
longing to the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, as the case
may be..
l •••..
_
'j
30
6. The Committee will submit its report within three months of the date ...
APPENDIX m
of this Resolution. Sd.I- List of persons who appeared before the Committee
D. C. Das
Secretary to the Govt. of India. LIST I-OFFICIALS
1. Shri Bhagwan Das Secretary, Education & Social t. Shri R. Gopalaswamy Secretary, Revenue Depart-
Welfare Department. ment.
Director, Social Welfare De- 2. Shri K. V. Ramakrishna Iyer Director, Harijan Welfare.
2. Shri B. R. K. Shastri
partrnent. 3. Shri Raghava Panicker Deputy Director, Harijan
Joint Director, Social Welfare Welfare.
3. Shri Kamala Manohar Rao
Department. MADHYA PRADESH
3. Shri K. N. Sharma Chief Secretary, NEFA Ad- 1. Shri A. Venkatesan Secretary, Home Department.
ministration.
2. Shri K. S. Sivasubramaniam Director, Harijan Welfare.
4. Shri M. D. Tyagi . Deputy Secretary NEFA Ad- 3. Shri Ram Hussain
i.
ministration. Deputy Secretary, Home De-
I:' partment.
i..
I'
BIHAR MAHARASHTRA
1',"
i' t. Shri S. K. Ghosh Secretary, Welfare Department. I. Shri M. V.peo Secretary, Education and
Social Welfare Department.
2. Shri K. K. Srivastava Secretary, Appointment De-
partment. 2. Shri K. J. Save Deputy Secretary, Education
and Social Welfare Deptt.
GUJARAT
3. Shri S. A. Shinde Director, Social Welfare.
i
I I. Shri M. D. Rajpal Secretary, Education & Labour
MvsoRB
Department.
l:,
i 2. Shri B. B. Brahmabhat Deputy Secretary, Education I. Shri M.;K. Venkateshan Secretary, Planning, .~ing
& Labour Department. & Social Welfare DePart-
ment. .
3. Shri P. J. Desai Under Secretary, Education
:,1. & Labour Department. 2. Shri I?Nag Sethi Deputy Secretary, 'Housing
4. Shri C. P. Patel Director of Social Welfare. & Social Welfare, Peptt.
5. Shri B. G. Parmar Deputy Director of Social 3. Shri Zafar Saifullah Director, Social Welfare.
Welfare. 4. Shri M. Manikatte Evaluation Officer.
6. ShriV. J. Kuruwa Deputy Director of Social Wcl•. 5. Sbri K.}d. Koti Assistant Director. Social
fare . . Welfare. '.'" .
!;~
34 35
t.'
,.
f;-
36 37
'38
lII-concld.
, APPENDIX APPENDIX IV
72. Shri Netram Nathubhai Patel . President, Khatik Uthan Sangh,
Khairwari, Bombay. List of Communities Recommended for Inclusion
'73. Shri Ram Prasad, Ex-M.L.A. Vice President, U.P. Dhabi
Mahasabha. Community Reasons for inclusion'
'74. Shri Ram Prasad Dhusia
75. Shri R. Chinnaswamy . Secretary, Tamil Nad Desiya A. SCHEDULED CASTES
Salavai Tholilalar Sangam.
Andhra Pradesh
76. Shri Radha Kishan Yadav President, Anusuchusit Jati
Seva Sangh. 1. PASI There are about 1500 persons belonging to
this community in Andhra Pradesh.
77. Shri Ram Prashad . Secretary Dhobi Mahasabba They are suffering from social handicaps.
Jullundur Punjab. based on untouchability.
78. Shri Ram SinghBhanavath
Jammu and Kashmir
79. Shri R.N. Rathod
:80. Shri Ranjit Naik .
2. GEN 1 These are castes of drum beaters and
basket makers in Jammu province.
81. Shri S. N. Prasad 3. MOLCr They suffer from social disabilities based
I
82. Shri Trikambhai R. Patel Social Worker, President Ahme- on the practice of untouchability. There
dabad Distt. Panchayat 4. NADIALA are in all about 200 families.
. Committee.
5. MAZHABI Engaged in scavenging. Suffer from
:83. Shri S. R. Sivaraman Member, Kudumbi Seva San- untouchability.
gam, Nanthiathu.
84. Shri T. Kesavan . Secretary, Depressed Classes Kerala
League, Kuilon .
6. MADIGA • Madigas are cobblers by profession. They
85. Shri Udai La! Maharwal are suffering from untouchability, and
:86. Shri Vaghya Nath are backward economically and' edu-
,87. Shri pyrai Lal Khanjia General Secretary, Delhi State cationally. They are akin to CHAKKI-
Dhobi Mahasabha. LIYANS, but are a distinct community.
.88. Shri Kanahya Lal President, Dhobi Mahasabha
Punjab. Punjab
:89. Shri Keshav Lal . President, Samagra Dhobi 7. BARWALA This community is economically, educa-
Association, Ahmedabad. tionally and socially very backward and
'90. Shri Sambasiva Rao is suffering from tangible handicaps
based on the practice of untouchability.
Population about 2",200..
i·
\'
Delili
8. DHEA or DHA YA or
·~;~t'
About 500 persons in Delhi. Treated as
i. DHEV. untouchables even by Bhangis.
!~. Tripara
9. DHULI or BADYA- They are suffering' from untouchability.
KAR or SABDAKAR. Some of them are working as, sweepers.
Estimated population 2300.
39
w~ "J~\l·'.:;,-a-" ,,.'It,.~-· ""..".•~-~--:-,': ..'~,~.~~._--~--
!~
40 41
APPENDIX IV-cone/d.
ApPENDIXlV-coil/d.
Community . Reasons for inclusion
Community Reason for inclusion
13. KANET' (of' Clihota They are isomted tribal commiinity. Their --.,
B. SCHEDULED TRIBES and Bara Banglal) or
SEOK .
social customs are distinctive, and they
engage in primitive type of; agriculture
=
~
and 'sheep rearing. Population about
.Jammu & Kashmir 6,000.
1. CHAMPA A tribal community living in the Chushul
area of Ladakh. Has tribal characteris- .Uttar Pradesh
tics, and is very isolated. Population 14. BHOTIA They live in the isolated border,areas,
about 1000.
and have a distinct tribal organization.
Estimated population 18,000.
:Kera/a
15. BUKSA A tribal group found in the Naini Tal
2. ALLAR Terai. They number about 10,000 and
They are a and
gatherers very are
primitive tribe inof caves.
still living food are primitive.
Population about 300. 16. JAUNSARI A polyandrous tribal group residing in
3. KANALADI or This tribe is found in Wynad, and number theDehra Dun, Tehri Garhwal and
KALANADI. about 350. They are primitive, and live Uttarkashi districts. They are isolated,
far removed from centres of educational and backward. There are however some
and industrial development. forward groups, viz. Bralunins and Raj-
4. KUNDUV ADlYAN This is a small tribe inhabiting the forest puts, who are being excluded. Estimated
areas of Wynad. Their population is population 56,000.
about 500. 17. THARU A distinct tribe of the Tehri Belt of Uttar
5. MALA ADIYAN This is a primitive section of the KURA- Pradesh. They are very primitive.
VANS, inhabiting the Wynad area. Estimated population 44,000.
it Population about 6000. 18. RAJI This is a more common name· for BAN-
Jungle cultivators and hunters in the Wynad MANUS, hitherto treated as a Scheduled
·6. MALAKKARAN or Caste.
MALAMUTTAN or area. Population about 1000.
MALAPANlKKAR. 19. ORAON . The tribal DHANGARS of Mitzapur
district are a section of the ORAONS.
7. MALA VETTUVAN A primitive jungle tribe, living in difficult DHANGAR is presently included in
and isolated conditions in the Wynad the list of Scheduled Castes;
area. Population about 3500.
8. PATHIYAN A small tribe residing in Eastern Wynad.
Have tribal characteristics and arc
isolated. Population about 300.
Madras
9. NARIKORAVAN or A very backward tribe, with distinctive
KURIVIKKARAN. dress and customs. Population about , .•..~-~.
3500.
Punjab
10. BETA
11.CHAN
12. DOMBA. or GARA
or ZOBA
J
l tribal areas of Lahaul and Spiti and
theircommunities
These
about
way of lifeare
those 1,400.
and customs
living in ,theresemble
iSOl,
of the tribal folk. Population
atcd
:.,f..,i~~~;.~~i'" ~:~ill.::
'~,,'··;~;..:r,\·J·t'~·;, ~!, , ...c::;.,~:-'t ..\~,·,~;;:.:...:..oc...~.~,,:,_ ....~_· _
Ifl".~._< "':··ii:6;.i;;~jL'i.~~£;·;&;:"'~'{JW..;~>,-·I:.:('...,.i'.,;.;."" ~"1.~,;_'""",.:::#.~U·t!!!1!,~,~t!~
,'f,". /"IJ~;~ ..'. ..__
.
f
43
ApPBNDIXV-contd.
APPENDIX V Reasons for exclusion
Community
List of Communities Recommended for Exclusion Kerala
Community Reasons for exclusion 15. BANDI Not found in the State.
16. BELLARA Not found in the State.
A. SCHEDULED CASTES 17. CHANDALA A derogatory term; not a caste.
J 8. GODAGALl Not found in the State.
Andllra Pradesh
1. CHANDALA Not a caste but a general term which is 19. GODDA Population insignificant. Not socially dis~
also derogatory. tinguishable.
Number insignificant. Not socially dis- 20. KOOSA Not found in the State.
2. SAMBAN
tinguishable. 21. PULA YAVETTUV AN There is no such caste in the State bu t
VETTUV ANS who are not schedule d
Assam wrongly call themselves PULAYA VET-
or According to Registrar General these are TUVANS.
3. BRlTIIAL-BANIA
BANIA. utensil-makers and there is no evidence 22. RANEYAR Not found in the State.
of any tangible disabilities arising out
of the practice of untouchability. Madhya Pradesh
4. JALKEOT No evidence of untouchability. :?.3. BELDAR or SUNKAR Not suffering from untouchability.
5. SUTRADHAR They are mostly carpenters and do not suffer 24. DAHAlT, DAHAYAT Village watchmen; do not suffer from
from untouchability. orDAHAT. untouchability.
25. DHOBI
Gujarat districts where they do not suffer from
untouchability
Scheduled only ..in Raisen and Sehor:]
HOLAYA DASAR 26. DOHOR Not found in the State.
7. HALEER ... The communities are either not found in 27. KOLl Not suffering from untouchability.
6. HALSAR,
8. CHENNA DASAR or1
OR HASL- the State, or their populations are so 28. KUMHAR Potters; not suffering from untouchability.
ARHULASV AR HA- I insignificant, that they are socially indis-
LASVAR. }- tinguishable from the rest of the popula- 29. MADGl Not found in the State.
30. MUSKHAN Small population mostly found in urban
10. LlNGADER . areas; not suffering from untouchability.
11. MUKRI . 31. RUJJHAR Do not suffer from s~cial handicaps.
12. SHEMALlAor HOLER .
9. HOLAYA j tion. , MmlrlU - ..
Jammu ancl Kashmir 32. AJILA Not found in the State. '. "
13. JOLAHA . This is a profession, and the name is not 33. BELLARA
Not found in the State .. '".:.:..~~.
used in Jammu and Kashmir to denote a 34. CHALAVADI
caste. Population insignificant. Not socially dis~
tinguishable.
14. WATAL Watals, who are engaged in scavenging, 35. CHANDALA A derogatory term; not a caste.
are Muslims, and cannot be treated as a
Scheduled Caste. Special schemes for 36. GODAGALLI Not found in the State.
their development can be taken up as 37. GODDA
they are engaged in an unclean popula- Population insignificant; not socially dis-
tion. tinguishable.
38. KARIMPALAN Not found in the State.
42 -. -.+0--- .
: L3DeptofSS/6S-4
... ~.'---,--.
~.. . >·,0.··'""_'"
44
4S
ApPENDIXV-contd.
ApPI!ND~ V-c()ntd.
Community Reasons for ex elusion
Community Reasons for exclusion
39. KOOSA Not found in the State. 64.DAKKAL(DOKKAL- Not found in the State.
40. MAILA WAR).
Population insignificant; not socially dis-
tinguiShable. 65. DEVENDRAKULA- Do.
41. MUNDALA THAN.
Population insignificant; not socially dis-
tinguishable. 66. DOM, DOMBARA, Do.
42. NALAKEY A VA PAiDi or PANO.
Population insignificant; not socially dis-
tinguishable. 67. GARODAorGARO Do.
43. NAYADI . Not suffering from untouchability. 68. GODAGALLI Do.
, , 44. PADANNAN Not found in the State. 69. GOSANGl Do.
,
45. PALLUVAN Population insignificant; not socialy dis- 70. JAGGALl . Insignificant population; not socially dis-
I: tinguishable. tinguishable.
i,1
I,
~:
Mysore
59. ANAMUK Not found in the State.
86. SAPARI
87. SEMMAN
R8, SHENV A. CHENV A,
Not found
Do.
in the State.
Do.
'~'~.,
60. ARUNTHATHIYAR Do. SEDMA, RAWAT
(RAVAT).
61. BANDY Do. 8<), T1RUVALLUVAR Do.
62. CHANDALA Derogatory term; not a caste. 90. TURI Do.
63. CHERUMAN Not found in the State. 91. VALLUV AN Do.
n. VATHIRlYAN Do.
-..,,;~_.
..•. L":';:";;':iJ:.~~""jl.':t,, ::''':·'l •.• ~,,-,,,,_,,,,:,, .~.~ __.__ ,,_, __ " ==_~= ~_
r~""""'''';''''''''''''''~&~"''''
46 47
X- V-contd.
---------------------------------
ApPENDIX
..----
cOlltd.
------- ---------------------------------
Community
ApPENDIX
1l2. BAKAD or BANT Do. 139. BAISWAR Do not suffer from untouchability.
] 13. BANCHADA Do. 140. GHARAMI Population insignificant. There is no like-
] 14. BARAHAR or BASOD Do. lihood of their being socially distinguish-
able as a caste.
115. BAROUNDA Do. 141. GUAL General name for cowherds. Not untouch-
116. BHANUMA T1 . Do. ables.
117. CHALVADI or CHA- Do. 142. KHAIRAHA Do not suffer from untouchability.
NNAYYA . 143. KHOROT
. ---.-- ...-'-~
Do.
~.
( ,
, ~~'~;~./~''':i=J.5!t'' .,,~;;j;;;; ~,.i",w< "~_;;4i~~~" __ • u • ·L.j;.3.:::·ti;i;~a:'~ ~ 'O;:,.;~:.,;
48 49
ApPENDIX V-contd. ApPENDIX V-contd.
__,_.u _
--' ----------------------.-.'--------
Community
."-.-
Reasons for exclusion
.------ Community Reasons for exclusion
144. SANAURHlY A Scattered throughout the State. Not suffer-
ing from untouchability. 16:!. GOUR Immigrant group. Do not suffer from
untouchability.
Dac/ra & Nagar Haveli 163. GUNAR Not found in the State.
145. MAHAR . Population insignificant. There is little IM.GUR Immigrant group. Do not suffer from
likelihood of their b"ing socially dis- untouchability.
tinguished as a Caste.
165. KAHAR Do not suffer from untouchability.
Delhi 166. KANUGH Population insignificant; not sociaIly dis-
146. BANJARA Not untouchables. They are found in tinguishable.
Delhi proper. They are also dispersed, 167. KHADIT Do.
and have no tribal characteristics.
168. KHEMCHA Not found in the State.
147. BHIL Found in Delhi proper. Not a caste,
but a tribe. Assimilated and have not 169. KOIR Immigrant group. Do not suffer'from un-
tribal characteristics. touchability ..
148. KABIRPANTHI. Not a caste, but a religious sect. Scheduled 170. KORA Do not suffer from untouchability.
Castes can return themselves under their 171. MALl They are mainly gardeners and garland-
respective castes. makers and are not suffering from un-
149. MALLAH . Not an untouchable community. None touchability. The untouchable com-
returned during 1961 Census. munity is BHUlMALI which is retained
in the Schedule.
150. PERNA Not found in the territory.
151. SlNGIW ALA or Do. B. SCHEDULED TRIBES
KALBELIA.
/1//(/111'0 Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
I. BHIL Population insignificant : assimilated.
152. BAWARIA Insignificant population; not socially dis.
tinguishable. :!. KATTUNY AKAN Do.
153. SANSI Do. J. KULIA Do.
Manipur 4. MALI Not a tribe; gardeners and garland-mak-
ers.
154. SUTRADHAR Not found in the State.
Ponelicherry Bihar
155. MALA MALAMASTI Population insignificant; not socially distin 5. BANJARA The population is insignificant. , Assimi-
guishable. lated with the general populatiotl.
Tripura -,.~~~~
(j/4iarat
156. BAITI Not found in the State.
ft. GOND or RAJOOND Very small population. Have lost tribal
157. GUNAR Insignificant population; not socially d~ characteristics in Guiarat.
tinguishable.
7. KOLI Tribals are DHOR-KOLl, who are includ-
158. DANDASI Do. ed in the list of Scheduled Tribes.
159. DHENUAR Do. Ii. KOLl MALHAR, Not found in the State.
160. DUAl Not found in the State. KOLI MAHADEV or
DONGAR KOLI.
161. GORANG ,Do-;-
~
c
./
/,-
50 51
V-contd.
ApPENDIX V-contd.
ApPENDIX
Community" Reasons for exclusion Reasons for exclusion
Community
9. SJDDI Do not poSSt'sstribal characteristics. An
African tribe, assimilated with genera]
population. 41. MALAYAN ")
10. VAGHRI Do not possess tribal characteristics.
Kera/a
42. MANNAN.
43. MALAYARAYAR I
I
II. ARANDAN Population 'NIL'.
Population insignificant; assimilated.
I 12. KAMMARA Do. 45. MALAYEKANDI
]3. KOCHUVELAN Do. 44.
46. MAHA MALASAR
MUTHURAN
14. KONDA KAPU Not found in the State. 47. PALLEYAN j
]5. KONDA REDDY Population insignificant; assimilated. 48. PALLIYAR Insignificant population. Do not possess
:! ' ]6. KOTA Do. tribal characteristics.
]7. MALEYAKANDI Not found in the State.
.'
]8. MALA MALASAR
19. MARATI .
Do.
Assimilated in the. general population; no
DWELLERS) .
49. ULLADAN (HILL 1Population 'NIL.'
(I: tribal characteristics. 51.
20. V1SHAVAN Not found in the State. 50. VISHAVAN
URALY .. . J
Madhya Pradesh •\1aharashtra
21. OARASIA including Not found in the State. 52. BAVACHA or The population is insignificant and they
RAJPUT GARASIA. BAMCHA. have become <\ssimilatedin the general
22. KEER No tribal characteristics; assimilated. population.
23. KOLAM .. Not found in the State. ;
,"
53. BAlOA
24. MINA No tribal characteristics. t: 54. BHAINA 1
Madras I"d, 55. BHATTRA
25. ADIYAN Insignificant population.
tribal characteristics.
Do not possessi,:
56. BIRHOR I These tribes are at present scheduled
26. ARANADAN Do. 11 57.0ADABA
58. KHARJA
II of Vidarbha.
in 1931 and other sources,
From the it isrecords
Census
that these tribes are either not Cound
clear
27. ERAVALLAN Population 'NIL'.
28. HILL PULAYA Do. 59. KORWA I at all in the Vidarbha area, or are Cound
29. KAMMARA Insignificant population. Do not possess 60. MAJHWAR
r in negligible numbers, assimilated in the
tribal characteristics. 61. MUNDA .
30. KANIY AN or Population 'NIL'. 62. NAOASIA I general population.
KANYAN. 63.0RAON
31. KOCHU VELAN Do. 64. PARJA I
65. SAUNTA ' ..
32. KONDAREDDI
33. KONDA KAPU 1 66. SAVARA J
34. KORAGA I ·"t.
Mys()re '';;''-i' -.
35. KUDIYA or
MELAKUDI. I
I Insignificant populations. Do not possess :
67. ADlYAN Not found in the State. .' ••••• Jl<
52 ~3
ApPENDIXV-comd. ApPENDIXV-Contd.
Reasons for exclusion
----------------
Community
------------------------
Reasons for exclusion Community
-~_.. ---------------------------
72. DHODIA . Not found in the State 97. KULI Do not have tribal characteristics.
Actually a Hindu caste, n6t untouch-
73. DUBLA including Do. able.
TALA VIA or HAL-
PATI 98. SAUNT! Do not possess tribal characteristics.
74. GAMIT or GAMT A or Do. l'u/(;ab
GA VlT including 99. GADDI Do not possess tribal characteristics. At.
MAVCHI, PADVI present scheduled only for Lahaul and-
VASAVA, VASAVE
and VALVI Spiti, where they do not live.
75. KADAR Do. Riljafthan
76. KAMMARA Insignificnnt population; assimilated. 100. BARDA Not found in the State.
77. KATTUNAYAKAN Do. IO!. BAVACHAor Do.
BAMCHA
78. KOKNA, KOKNI, Do.
KUKNA. 102. CHODHARA Do.
79. KONDA KAPU Not found in the State, 103. DANKA, including Do.
80, KONDA REDDY Do TADVI, TETARIA and
VALVI.
81". KOTA Insignificant population; assimilatcd. 104. DHODlA Do.
82. KURICHCHAN Not found in the State,
IOS. DUBLA, induding Do.
83. MAHA MALASAR Do. TALAVIA or HAL-
PATI.
84. MALASAR Insignificant population; assimilated.
106. GAMIT or GAMT A or Do.
85\ MUDUGAR or Not found in the State.
\ MUDUVAN. GA VIT, including
MAVCHI, PADVI,
·lM.·PATELIA . Do. VASAVA, VASAVE
and VALVI.
8'7:'POMLA Do.
107. GOND or RAJGOND Do.
88': PULAYAN Do. - ..
108. KOKNA, KOKNr, Do. Do.
89. RATHAWA Insignificant population; assimilated. KUKNA. Do.
90. SHOLAGA Do.
109. KOLI-DHOR, TOKRE
91. TODA Do. KOLI, KOLCHA or
KOLGHA.
92. VARLl Do,
110. KORKU
93. VlTOLlA including Do.
KOTWALIA and 111. NAIKDA or NAY AKA, ,..,~~~~.
BARODIA. including CHOLlV ALA
Orll'sa NAYAKA, KAPADIA
NAYAKA, MOTA
94. CHENCHU An Andhra tribe far removed from its NAYAKA and NANA
habitat. Their number in Orissa is NAYAKA.
insignificant, and they have lost their t 12. PARDHI including Do.
tribal characteristics. ADVICHINCHER and
95. GHARA Not found in ~he State. PHANSE PARDHI.
96. KANDHA GAUDA Do. -IH·P!ttELIA w •• _ •••• _Do.
__.--'_. __ . _....:.._a2:'2'!~tl••'.M'ti!'i{;;(~:·.:~.·:·.d."••~,_ :'-·.l:j,:;;~..•...•.• M~·~..-I.'-i-.'
rfi".;,1trJ~J~."'~'t't:~;".,;'l;·"fi(j·~~·f" .,
(
54
ApPENDIX V-Cone/d.
Community Reasons for exclusion APPENDIX VI
114. POMLA Not found in the State.
Do. List of Proposals Rejected by the Committee
115. RATHAWA
116. VARLI Do.
Community List of Proposal Reasons for rejection
117. VITOLIA, KOTWA- Do.
LIA or DARODJA.
Amllira Pradesll
West Bengal
J. MALA Shri H. C. Heda, M.P., The Committee did not
118. ASUR The tribe is not found in the State.
proposed exclusion accept this for reasons
1]9. BAlGA This is found only in insignificant numbers from the existing list mentioned in para 16
and does not possess tribal characteris- of Scheduled Castes as of the Report.
tics. they are advanced.
120. BANJARA The tribe is not found in the State. .., MOCHlor Shri B. Anjanappa, M.P., Leather workers. They
121. BATHUDJ Do. MUCHI proposed exclusion are suffering from un--
from the existing list of touchability.
122. BINJHIA Do. Scheduled Castes as
123. BIRJIA Do. they were not untouch-
ables.
124. CHIK BARAIK Do.
3. MALI The Govt. of Andhra They are garland makers
125. KAOND This is found only in insignificant num- Pradesh proposed and do not possess tri--
bers and does not possess tribal c11anu;- retention in the list· of bal characteristics.
i."
teristics. Scheduled Tribes.
p:
, .
Himachal Pradesh
4. AGNIKULAK- Shri B. Anjanappa, M.P., They are fishermen and
126. GADDJ SHATRIYA, and four others pro- do not possess tribal
I:'
127. GUJJAR not possess
}These tribal characteristics.
are nomadic communities and do PALLI, BBSTA, posed inclusion in the characteristics and are
GANGAPUTRA. list of Scheduled not untouchables.
TripurQ VODABALIGA Tribes.
aud JALALI.
128. BHlL. Tea garden labourers, assimilated in gener-
al population. Population negligible. 5. DOMMARA Shri & Smt. B. Anjana- They are nomads who·
]29. BHUTJA Assimilated. Population insignificant. ppa, proposed inclu- have developed con-
sion in the list of Sche- tacts with advanced
130. CHAIMAL Not found in the State. duled Tribes.• communities. Do Dot
131. LEPCHA . No tribal characteristics. J?9ssess tribal charac-
teristics.
..
('. PARDHI Shri H. C. Heda, M.P.,
proposed inclusion in Fruit sellers.
possess Dia· ~not
,•..
tribal~D.arac-
the list of Scheduled teristics. They' are nei-·
Tribes. ther isolated nor pri-
mitive.
7. VODDAR . Shri H. C. Heda. M.P., There was no evidcnce to
propoied inclusion in show that they possess-
the list of Scheduled ed tribal characteris-
Tribes. tics Do not suffcr from
unto1,1chability.
55--
F~ i'~'.~jr~~;:Y·~4:i.iwM.,.~~a)il":t~,:.~w;.",.;-:,
.. ::~!. ,;'•. 'c..~' ~ ••~~ .•.•. _
:.::.:>", .• l;til~j~i~7_,"'-:-·' Id:~',;":_' ";:t~ ".', •. ..2.~&~:~:~_._'_'"_. __ ....:._..:;.._,
57
56
ApPENDIX VI-c-Cpntd.
VI-COllld.
--------- ..---------
Community
ApPENDIX
3. HANDIJOGI
KEPMARI
5. KORACHA
I
~
:
these communities
to the list of Scheduled
Tribes.
expected to have tri-
bal chacracteristics,
trace of nomadism and
social handicaps aris-
2. NAMASUDRA .
proposed inclusion in in West Bengal, to
which they belong. No
6. KORAMA I Shri R. Muniswamiah, ing out of untouch-
the list of Scheduled 7. SILLEKYATHA I Gen. Secy., Harijan ability. In Mysore,
Castes. evidence of untouch- 8. SUDUGADU I Sewak Sangh, Mysore, however, there was no
ability. SIDHA J proposed exclusion of evidence to show that
BHOVI, KORACHA these groups possess-
iJammll & Kashmir and KORAMA from ed tribal characteris-
I:-
The Government of They are nomadic and the list of Scheduled tics. It was, therefore,
l.BAKARW AL ') advanced. Do not pos-
Jammu & Kashmir Castes as they do not decided not to transfer
2. GUJJAR . ~ sess tribal characteris-
3. GADDl ; proposed inclusion in suffer from untouch- them to the list of
the list of Scheduled tics. Scheduled Tribes. At
4. SHlPPl J
Tribes ..
ability.
the same time as they
The Government of They are denotified com- seemed to be suffering
Jammu & Kashmir munities. Do not pos- from marginal handi-
-6. SANSI sess tribal characteris- caps arising out of the
5. BAZIGAR } proposed inclusion in tics. Found in urban
the list of Scheduled practice of untouch-
Tribes. areas. ability in the areas
where they are present-
.;Xera/a ly scheduled it was
SjShri Divakaran and It was admitted during considered advisable
1. KULALA ') discussions that thc
K. V. K. Nair, Presi- to retain them in the
dents of all Travancore communities did not list of Scheduled Cast-
2.0DA
3. VALAN Jr suffer from untouch-
Velan Mahasabha and es with the existing
Kerala Kulala Associa- ability. area restrictions.
tion respectively pro- I). BUDUBIDIKE ')
posed inclusion in the
list of Scheduled Casl- 10. BESTHA
BUNDE I
es. II. DOMBAR ' The Govt. of Mysore There'was no evidence to
':Madras 12. HALAKKI I proposed inclusion in
the list of Scheduled
show that these com-
Shri M. Ethirajalu, This is an advanced VOKKAL r munities 'p~ssesil::..~ibal
1. OHOBI 13. KACHE I Tribes. charactcnstlcs. ~~
M.L.e., Gcneral group rid!, par:l 1(, of GOWLIGA '
(VAN NAN) Report. It was lhen:-
Secrclary, All Indian
rore, nol considered
14. KUDUBl I
Rajak Maha Sangh 15. KATABU I
and President, Tamil necessary to schedule
them throllgholll Ihe 16. SIDDI J
Nad Desiya Salavai 17. BARIKI No evidence that the
Tozhilalar Sangam Stale. They are how- Shri B. Rallllllappa of
cwr, being relained in Magal, Bellary district, community suffered
proposed inclusion in proposed inclusion in rrom untouchability.
the list of Scheduled the list for the I(anya
Kulllari district aIlli the list of Schcdulcd
Caslcs. Casles.
Shcnkotah ta!uk or
Tiruncl.vdi Jistricl.
------------.-.---- .....
.,,,,;,~i';~('+···'~"""';'''·
f'~ jr"""'~,(""'~';";';"'"'~"';""'"
.,.,.; .•..•...•••.
r,Ml!:~'~
59
1" 58
;\,
.i' APPENDIX VI-Colfld .
;!' ApPENDIX VI-Contd.
Community List of proposal Reasons for rejection
Reasons for rejection
List of proposal
Community Rajasthan
No evidence to show that I. YADAV Shri Radha Kishan Information furnished by
Shri Thathaiah, Hospet the community poss-
18. DOMBJDASA Taluk, Bellary district Yadav proposed inclu- Shri Y ada v shows that
essed tribal characteris- sion of YADAV as a YADA VS do not do
proposed inclusion in tics. leather work like
the list of Scheduled synonym of JATAV.
Tribes. lATAVS but are main-
No evidence to show ly agriculturists and
Shri N. S. Helawar, Vice that the community are not untouchables.
19. HELAV President, Dharwar
possessed tribal cha- 2. MALI Shri Udai Lal Maharwal It was admitted that the
District, Nomadic racteristics. community did not
and Semi-Nomadic proposed inclusion in
the list of Scheduled suffer from untouch-
Tribes Sevak Sangh, Castes. ability.
Hubli, proposed
inclusion in the list of 3. KOLI THAKUR Shri Banwari La! Gaur No evidence was adduced
Scheduled Tribes. proposed inclusion in to show that they
Among the Marathas and' the list of Scheduled possess any tribal cha- .
Shri K. Venkappa, Pre- Maratis only the group Tribes. racteristics. Already
20. MARATHA sident, Dakshina Kan-
MARATl 'KADU MARATl' getting benefits under
nada Jilla Maratha the border areas sche-
appeared to possess
Samaja Seva Sangh, tribal characteristics. me.
Udipi P.O. Alevoor Hence the entries 4. DHANKA and Shri Dal Chand propos- At present they are
(South Kanara) and MARA THA and: TETARIA ed inclusion in the list . scheduled in Abu Road.
Shri S. Subbayya Naik, MARATI have been of Scheduled Tribes
M.L.A. P.O. SuIlia taluka, where they ~
replaced by KADU throughout the State. not found. In other
(South Kanara) pro- MARATI. parts of Rajasthan.
posed retention in the they are diffused
list of Scheduled Trib-
es. among the general
population, and have
Shri B. K. N. MurthY, lost their tribal mode
No. H-92, II Cross, of life.
Mission Road, Banga- Uttar Pradesh
lore and Shri Ranga-
ppa of Bangalore pro- I. BIYARor The Govt. of Uttar Pra- ftt. study conducted by
posed exclusion from BAYAR desh proposed inclu- the Deputy. Coinmjs.:..
the list of Scheduled sion in the list of Sche- sioner for Scheduled
Tribes. duled Castes. Cl1&tes and Scheduled
Tribes showed that
Punjab they did not suffer
No evidence to show from untouchabilit}.
Shri Hem Raj, M.P., that they suffer from
1. CHHIMBA 2. BORA The Adimjati sewak
proposed inclusion in untouchability.
list of Scheduled Cast- 5angh proposed inclu- ~oportjustification in ~p~_
of the propo~~
es. sion in the list of Sche- was. given. This com-.~·
They are nomadic she- duled Tribes. , munity appears to be
The Govt. of Punjab pro- pherdS and herdsmen
2. GADDl posed inclusion as a a Rajput Caste with.
and are economically no tribal characteris-
Scheduled Tribe for well off. Do not pos- tics.
Kangra district also. sess tribal characteris- .3. PANIKA The Govt. of Uttar No evidence to show.that
tics. It was decided to PANKA Pradesh and Shri Ram
~: .
deschedule them from PANKHA
they possessed'tn'bal
the areaS where they Pyare, M.L.A., pro- : characteristics. They;'
posed inclusion in the however,suffeted
are at present sche- list of Scheduled Trib-
duled. .from untouchability"
es. It was, therefore,
L3D~rl of 55 '65-5
';' ,--'
I
.'.~!.,.:·i'
(!'f; i,
60 61 I
l'~r,!':J:
j"r,':r"
A!'PBNDlX VI-Contd. ApPBNDIX .VI-Conc1d.
P!\ ;
List of proposal Reasons for rejection Community Reasons for rejection
'Community Lis~ of proposal
decided to retain them
in the list of Scheduled 15. MASANIA~JOGI No evidence to show
Castes. sident, Delhi State
that they suffered from
The information given
16. PATHER 1Shri B. N. Chalukia.
Welfare Pre- untouchability.
Organisation
4.KAHAR . Shri Chhedi Lal Sethi, PHORE,
M.L.C., proposed their showed that the Kahars SANGTARASH Classes, New Delhi,
inclusion in the list of were dispersed and liv- 17. NAI, BARBER, proposed inclusion in
Scheduled Tribes on ing among the general HAllAM t of
thethe
listMost
of Scheduled
Backward
the ground that they population. A large
number of them were J Castes.
are sprung from the fishermen. No evi-
GONDS and had J 8. TURI (TULI) Dr. Ananti Sarup Turi Only four families. They
social contacts with the dence of a tribal mode (Tuli), of Lajpat are well off. Not un-
GONDS. of life. Nagar. New Delhi, touchables.
proposed inclusion in
West Bengal the list of Scheduled
1. HELA The Hela Harijan Seva They are only a few Castes.
Samity, Calcutta, pro- families of Helas, and
posed inclusion as a these are found in
Calcutta city. No evi· Himachal Pradesh
Scheduled Caste.
dence was adduced to I. GADDI
show that they suffer· 2. GUJJAR . Pradesh proposed that not possess tribal cha-
ed from untouchabi· theseGovt.
• }The communities may These
of Himachal racteristics. it was,
communities do
Iity. be scheduled through- therefore, decided to
out the State. exclude from the list
even in respect of
1. ABBASI, areas where at pre-
De~iBHISTI-SARKA 1 sent scheduled,
RAYEE.
2. ARjUN,
KUNJRA I 4.5. PASHI
KOIRI
SURMAN the list of Scheduled
Tripura They
Castes.
tural
I.are labourers
ability
ateNo untouchables.
The able.
evidence
immigrants
in Tripura.
.either
MALLA- tea-garden
Govt.
proposedand
.. labourers or ~
Do.
of inclusion
untouch-
Do.
Fishermen.of Not inuntouch-
Tripura
3. BANNERWALA 3. PANTATI 2. JIIALO-MALO
4. BAR!
5. BAIRAGI 1
-6. CHIRIMAR
Shri B. N. Chalukia, No evidence to show
1. DAKAUT, President, Delhi State that they suffered froll
PARADE Welfare Organisation untouchability.
:So DHINWAR of the Most Backward
(JHINWAR) Classes, New Delhi,
MEHRA- proposed inclusion in
MAHAR, the list of Scheduled
KAHAR Castes.
9. GADARlA
10. GADDI-GARRl,
GADEHRl-GARI
11. GHASlARA
12. KATPUTLI
NACHANE
WALA
113.KUMHAR,
PRAJAPATI
il4.LUHAR
~c::. ~:_~:;.;;.J~,t.itil:~~~~"
..· . i.D .• ,ii••...~~ ,_
~,."':.:!' ~'·""''''''''''''''''''··.J'';~''''lI>':!'i~·'·''1'r'··L'ji,
. -,' •...... ,' !~"~',
-
JAMBUVULU ..
_.
GODAGULA
ANAMUK
BAVURI
ADI
DAKKALA
MADIGA
ARNA
BARIKI
PAIDI
MEHTAR
MANG
BEDA
DHOR
HOLEYA
CHALVADI
MADASl
GHASI
DANDASI
• MALA
MADICA
VALMIKI
ARAYVide
PAMIDI
RELLI
PAKY
MAHAR
PANCHAMA
MALA
PAMBALA
PASI
MANNE
MASHTI
SAMAGARA
SINDHOLLU Caste
para..16
theDRAVIDA
BYAGARA
CHAMAR MALA
JANGAM
35.
ARUNDHATlYA
MALA
32.
33.
38.
.-.KOLUPULV
SkPIRI
ofKURUV
SANYASI
DASU DASU
HANNAI
(GARODI
30.
25.
. 3!.
'28.
'26.
27.
29.
24.
23.
MUNDALA
...
,. ANDLU
JANGAM
21.
of Sub-caste
theA ...
DOKKALA
... .. ...
------
CHAMBHAR
CHACHANDI
Report
BUDGA
MADARlKURUVA
37.
MALA
Sub-caste
MASHTEEN
DOM
36.
PARIAH
MOTI.
39.
Synonym
CHINDOLLU
1. Agency
BANSPHOR .,. .,
.."-.......,,DASARl
,
JANGAM
"':""i"
"tracts). .
HOLEY.,
THOTI20.
W'· A DASARlI
34. No.ASSAM
'
NETKANI
"22.
VARI PANO
MITTULA AYYA-
DOMBARA
- MALA MALA
63 SALE OR
WANDLU
BAINDLA No . GOSANGI
GODARl
YELLAMMALA-
MALA MASTI Throughout the State including N.E.F.A.
16. 'S.
astes
ApPENDIX VII-Contd.
~
(
~~.:",-------------------------
. .. il.
10.
i3.·
.. . ..
...
DUSADH
·...
., BALMIKI
DOM.
KANJAR HALALKHOR
·
CHAMBHAR
OLGANA
LALBEGI
~~ BHAMBI
15.
HAD! MEHTAR
CHAMADIA ~
--~__-
A ..
5.I. DUGLA
AGER
HIRA
PASI
BHOGTA
CHAMAR
JHALO
CHAMAR
MUSAHAR
MEHTAR
MAHARA
PATIn Caste
LALBEGI
Paiamau
mau
DHARHI
3.. BHANG!
i9
i7.
i8.
Caste
and Purnea.
districts.
DHARIKAR
NAT
PAN
S.Sub-caste
and MUCHI
MOCHI
Sub-caste .. ....
.,DHOBI
·,GHANGI
JHALO-MALO
SAWASI
"Synonym
BANT
BALMIKI
DHOLI
BHAMBHI
CHANNAYYA
"
64"..
"'~.~
KHALPA
20.
2,
..
RAJWAR
HARI
MALKANA
i6.
KAMATI
GUJARAT
i2. GHASIMOCHI
14.BAKAD
KURARIAR S.
4. No. RUKHI
21.
65
CHAMARTURIVII-Contd. DHARI
ApPBNDIX
CHALVADI
LALBEGI
CHAMGAR
HALALKHOR
MEHTAR
.::<.Sid.~a1~~~~l' '~ ~,~,;. ':."w.a. ••
areas.
(of the districts of Tri-
plains areas).
.. NONA • Ville...para
-,---
DHANUK
AUDHELIA
BEDIA
MADIGA
MALAYAN
MANNAN.
BHANUMATI
PANAN
KURAVAN
PULLUVAN
KAKKALAN
KOOTAN
KANAKKAN
KAVARA
VETAN
PARAYAN.
MAILA
PALLAN
VALLUVAN
VETTUVAN
VELAN
NAYADI
PULAYAN.
PUTHIRAI
PATHIYAN
GOSANGI
Caste
PARAVAN.
ofCaste
MOGEAR
8.
9.
2.
7.
3.
VANNAN
plains40.
II.
41.6.
39.
38.
37.
--...,
..
."16
S.
BAGDJ
..Sub-caste
of
'
Sub-caste
BARHAR
AHIRWAR
BAIRWA
BRAMBI
BASOD
BAHANA tl1e
CHlDARCHADAR
BARGUNDA
SlDHANAR
VEDAN
PERU
CHERAMAN
GAVARA
PADANNAN
PANCHAMA
THOTI
ding .. ...,
.,
Report.
. , NNAN
DEYAR
CHIKWI
CHAMARI
MA
""BEHANA
SynonymBANSODI
BALAI
KADAYAN
SynonymTHACHAR68MADHYA14.
BURUD
_.BASAR
BANSPHOR
VALLON
(exc1u- ..., ..
..
PRADESH
13.12.DEWAR
CHIKWA
. JATAV
SILAWAT
SUR~AI. CHAMAR
RAlDAS
ROHIDAS,
SATNAMI
·10.5.
R,~GAR
-,'~
'''::&'~''VII-Con/d.
APPENDIX
69
No.
RAMNAMI
BANCHADA
CHITAR
MOCHI
~, RAMNAMI
CHAMAR
MANGAN
SURJABANSHI
THACHAN (Carp
and Trivandrum). . 4. BALHI
-'-.:
:; ."
I
. I
"
~.
t:
ii:,
..
ADARI I I.
KOLlYAN
DOMBAN
KALLADl
GHANDA
GHASIA
AYYANAVAR
BAND
DOM.
KADAIYAN
KAKKALAN
AD!
ZAMRAL
DUMAR
MANG
DHARKAR
Puri,
KORI.
DHED
KOODAN
BAKUDA
MEGHWAL
HOLEYA
PANIKA
HOLIYA
MEHTAR
ISMAHAR
NAT
..
,
DOMBARA
IMANG
Shenkotah
ARUNTHATHIY
KHATlK
BAtRA
KHANGAR
MOGHIA
KOTWAL
CHERUMAN
MANG
PASI
KUDUMBAN
Ca~le
. ANDHRA
KANJAR
KUCHBANDHIA -.
yakumari
. 14.
12...'.
Taluk
CHAKKILIYAN Caste
DEVENDRAKULATHAN
KAVARA
fi~~BHARATAR 11.
MANa!
GARODI
MAHASHI
Sidhi, Goona.
16.
(of
..
Shahdol). Rajgarh, :
... .. ..
• .""PATHARIA
AD!
.T17.
5. ---district
(ofI Synonym
AR SOOT
Kan-
irooclvcli
Kan-
...
3. and district). ,
~~::~~.~.
- ""<.:
4.
MEHAR
6.
13. ..VSANS
•••..
Sub-caste
GHASI
CHAMAR
DOMAR
KOOTAN
GANDI
Sub-caste
DHERSARA
BALMIKI
KATJA
KALBELIA
Synonym
KARNATAKA
DRA ••. "".,
VIDA
ide I*19
pTHI
Ira
MADRAS
18.
. 16 of 33.SAMGARA
KANER
DAKHNI
17.
the
.34.
Report.
SANSIA
70
A
7.
the Shenkotah Taluk22.
9.
20.
I. the
MADARI
2. MUCHI
S. Tirunelveli
of yakumari
of
ll. ApPENDIX
10.
21. 71
• VII-Con/d
Vidl' para
-
district).
district and
16 of .the Report.
I
jijTiul
72 73
ApPENDIXVlI-Contd. APPENDIXVII-Contd.
is. Caste Synonym Sub-caste :So Caste Synonym Sub-caste
:No. No.
23. KURAVAN SIDHANAR
MAHARASHTRA
24. MADIGA . GOSANGI
JAGGALI I. AGER
JAMBUVULU 2. BAKED BANT
MATANGI
PAMBADA
PALLAN
PANNIANDI
MAVILAN.
PULAYAN.
VALLUVAN
VETAN
SAMBAN
PAGADAI
TIRUVALLUVAR
VETTIYAN
PADANNA
PUTHIRAI
SEMMAN
MALA
MOGERand
SAMBAVAR
PARAYAN.
URALY.district
PATHIYAN
VETTUVAN
PARAVAN
MANNAN :. VANNAN
. (ofofKanya-
25.
*34. 3. BH~NGI BALMIKI
Shenkotah
elveli Taluk
district).
30.
29.
28.
33. Shenkotah
of Nilgiris
kwnari
(of
Tirunelveli Taluk
district)
district). kumari district and the VANNAN HADI
6. 35.
27.
31.
"'26.
38.
39.
49.
36.
41.
37.
48.
45.
40.
47. 44.
43. Tanjavur
THOTI
42. ,THANDAN district). HALALKHOR
32.
HELA .
LALBEGI
MALAKANA
MEHTAR
OLGANA
KANAKKAN RUKHI .
ZADMALLI
4. BAHANA BAHNA
PANNADI 5. BALAHI BALAl
VATHIRIYAN
,6. BASOR BANSOR BURUD (of the
BANSODI districts of Buldha-
na. Akola.Amrava-
ti, Yeotmal. War-
dba, Nagpur, Bha-
ndara & Chanda).
"'. BEDA JUNGAM BUDGAJANGAM
8. BEDAR (oC the districts
of Buldhana, Alcola,
CHERAMAR Amravati,. Yeotmal,
Wardha, Nagpur, Bhan-
dara. and Chanda).
9. CHADAR
10. CHAMBHAR ASADARU KAMATI MOCHI
ASODI KATTA! MOCHI
BHAMBHI PRADESHI
CHAMADIA MOCHI
CHAMAR -"TELEGU MOCHI
CHAMARI
CHAMAGAR
HARALAYYA ,;~-
~~
HARALI
KHALPA
MACHIGAR
MADAR
MOCHIGAR
MOClU
NADIA
NONA
* Vide para 16 of the Report. RAMNAMI
r;{:- ,,1' ~ff/t""~'t;;tth.h·.~~f'~
,;;O~ .••.1I'Il'4!r'M •••••• ~ ••.•.••••••
,
74 75
7. BAKED
25. KORl KATIA 8. BAJ<.uDA
PATARIA ' 9. BATHADA.
26. MADlGA .. MADGI BAINDLA
MADIG - Vide para 16 of the Depot.
L3Ix:ptl. of SS{65-6
:•..,.;;.;o~~.~ '~"-~;;~fa..:,;.;;, ~,''''-"_'".. _'i":":'-';.:.",!:s.:~,;:;~~,·"·.-~,t'::'::~,-,~_~, ,;""",'~,_
•.;:;"'~""""~,,,,,,(••.' '
fnr1L_>,",,~ ....:r':i~~1.'~;:~~~j"·;~~;"~'~~.ih'i/ "'1t:!~:.;,-<: ••.•• ,: ..;. ~tlAJII>~~
76 77
ApPENDIX VII-Centd.
ApPENDIX VII-Colltd.
S. Caste SynonYm SUb-c1ste S. Caste Synonym Sub-caste
No. No.
10. BEDA JANGAM BUDGA JANGAM Bcllary, Chikmagalur,
11. BELLARA Chitradurga, Hassan,
12. BHANG! HALALKHOR Kolar, Mandya, Mysore
MEHTAR (except Kollegal Taluk),
THOT! Shimoga and Tumkur].
i I ZADMALI 24. KOOSA
*13. BHOVI {of the districts BOVI 25. KORACHA [of the dis-
of Bangalore, Bellary, tricts of Bangalore,
Chikmagalur, Chitra- Bcllary, Chikmagalur,
,I' durga, Haftsan, Kolar, Chitradurga, Hassan,
Mandya, Mysore (ex- Kolar, Mandya, Mysore
I, \
cept Kollcgal Taluk), (except Kollegal Taluk),
1: Shimoga and Tumkur]. Shimoga and Turnkur].
l( .
~r'._ 14. DAKKALIGA 26. KORAMA [of the dis-
15. DHOR KAKKAYYA tricts of Bangalore,
I;,;'
Bcllary, Chikmagalur,
ii-
,1
16. GRANTI CHORE [of Chitradurga Hassan,
the districts of Banga- Kolar, Mandya, Mysore
lore, Bellary, CWkma- (except Kollegal Taluk),
galur, Chitradurga, Has- Shimoga and Tumkur].
san, Kolar, Mandya, 27. KORAR
Mysore (except Kollegal
Taluk), Shimoga and 28. KUDUMBAN PALLAN
Tumkur]. 29. KOTEGAR. METRI
17. GODDA 30. KURAVAN
18. HANDI JOOI [of the 31. MACHALA
districts of Bangalore, 32. MADIGA MADAR ADI JAMBAVA
Bellary, Chikmagalur, MANG BAINDLA
Chitradurga, Hassan, MATANG CHANNAVYA
Kolar, Mandya, Mysore MlNIMADlGA CHENNADASAR
(except Kollegal Taluk), CHINDHOLLU or
Shimoga and Tumkur]. SINDHOLLU
19. HASLA MANG GARODI or
20. HOLEYA HOLAYA BYAGARA MANG GARUDI
HOLER CHALVADI YELLAMMALA-
HALASVAR or WANDLU or
HULASVAR YELLAMMALA-
HOLEY ADASAR WARU ".~ •.
KUKKAHOLEYA 33. MAHAR '#
MUNDALA 34. MAILA
NALAKADAYA 35. MALA
NALAKEYAVA ARAY MALA
W,
!
ARWA MALA
21. JAMBUVULU MALADASARI
:i 22. KALLADI MALAHANNAI
:j
MALAJANGAM
.:
23. KEPMARI [of the dis- MALAMASTI
,,-. tricts of Bangalore, MALA SALE or
NETKANI
• Vide para 16 of the Report.
MALA SANYASI
BEJIA - ... . ......
' ..• " AMAN"'-'
7.
4.
3. · 44.
BEDIA
5. BAGHUTI
6. BADAIK
BAURI
BASOR ~District
10. CHAMAR
...... .. ..
IBURUD
·i MOCHI
.TlRBANDA. ,. 23.
HARI
..
KHADALO
!i ..
PANOTANTf
HADI PARAYAN
MADARI
~
II GHASI " "I
~ .. ..
DOMBOKODALO
BAVURI I
I I
I l
MOGER
MUKRI
ADI ANDHRA
SAMAGARA
MEGHVAL
MASHTI
RANEYAR 22.
CasteMandy:\,
Caste ,rLINGAWANT-
GORAIT
S. and
Hassan,
Chikmagalur,
SILLEKYATHA Sub-caste
HALLEER
SAMAGARA
HARALAYYA-
ARYA
[of MENGHVAR
CHAKKILlYAN
Sub-caste
Synonym
Synonym
the PARA
BAGUTI
BAUTICHAKALI
KORAIT
GHASIA
BHANGI VA DURIA
13. DHANWAR
Ii
KHADALA
!I
"F
DOM ~
MOCHI .- ',-
CHAMBAGAR
18. No.
79
APPENDIX
GHUSURIAVII-Con/d.
12. , ..~
DANDASI :::~.~.-. ·14.
8.
9.
J5.
BELDAR
DHOBA
20. SATNAMI
DOM.
BHATA GODRA 19.
16. DOSADHA
21. GOKHA PAINDAPAIDI IRIKA
PAMIDI
HAnDI
MUCHI
MElITAR
, 11. CHANDALA ofkoraput
____ ·Ji'j~e __Pll~_aIJ_.of..theR~p():r1.
j
78
~ >
/
• ·_..••••'_'·f •••' ,.,.~ ", ••,",;"~,, "' •..•...
BAWARIA
r S.
\,~~ ..Caste
MAHURIA
MEDARI
MUSAHAR
SABAKHIA
-.,
UJIA Caste
.
. _-
·S.
19.
NAGARCHI
16.
17.
18.
7.
5.
6.
10.
12.
II.
2.
I.
--.
.KORl
GAGRA
GANDHILA
KHATIK
..•...
BALMIKI
BAURIA
BAZIGAR
9.S. AD
CHANAL
DAGI
DEHA
DARAIN
BARAR
-
-.- ·.....
·" .---.--
..CHAMAR ,... 30.
32.29. .
..--- .-..-,--- -,_•.....
.... .. ......
IIiMALA
Sub-caste
Sub-caste
DHARMI
Synonym
Synonym ·DHAYA
BHANGI
JULAHA.. ..
LOHARA
MADIGA
.JHALA
MARECHA
BHANJRA
JA
GANDIL
I' BERARTIA
DHANGRI
SINDURIA
nOR
PATUA
SAMASI
MANG
PANKA
BAJIKAR
KANDARA
"~
Vide24.
...
para
CHAMAR
" GONDOLA
16DHOGRI
RAIGAR
BURAR
DHEA
JAGGILI
14.
21.
PUNJAB
DOOM
REHGAR
4.
of the Report.
MAHASHA
.. I ...
MAZHABI
CHURA
',.
BATWAL
3. BARWALA iIi! ·"
-----RAVIDASI
808122.
24.
23. APPENDIX
NAT
20.
13. OD ..
15. DHANAK
DUMNA
MEGfl
MARIJA
RAMDASI VII-Con/d.
No. I·~.
~
DHE
i
"" ," ,. '" "'-. ".-'" ',~' , "''''i." ·'ri;.,~~,.;.!'C
.••
'l..i~;.'~~~~';:";"'.~:;''',~ ',h~""""'L '
BADOI ..
...
·.,
~ Synonym ..
.,.,Sub-caste
ilj! 22.
-... 26.
27.
28. KAMAD KORIA
JATAV
KALBELIA
KANJAR
18.
37. .. ,l ..
DA:BGAR
NAT MEGHVANSHI .,~~ I REGAR ., I i
Ii~
30. KHATIK 17. CHAMAR
j
.KUNJAR
.. .BANGALl.,
MEHAR RAIDASS
DHANUK "'l:';"
10.
32. DHEDA
34.
~:'REHAR
Caste
!Caste
MAJHABI 23.
KOOCHBAND
r
GANCHA
30.
S.Synonym
19.
33.
31.
:/
DHANAK
MAHAR
j
Ji ii
KOLI 21.
SANSI
I.. -- 'DOM
BHAMBHI
BAORl
AHERIA
j'
.
..
GANOIA
GARDA
Sub-caste
DHANKIA
KAMADIA
SAPERA
KORI
BHEDKUT
-VADI
JINGAR
BIRGI
MEGH
MADARI
CHURA ..
.
"..
, ,. 35.
25.
j 25.
24.
MEGHWAL
PASI
38.
36.
:1
!i
39.
GODHI
~A
PASIjVARIA .
MANESB
~
MOCHI
RAWAL
i
82
RAMDASIA
RAIGAR
29.
16.
15.
No.
83
GAROLDA
KHANGAR
BOLA
BlDAKLA
ApPENDIX VII-Contd.
-I I GURDA
,-
S. :';!::~r' ! VII-Contd.
ApPENDIXj
j
.~!i'~~';~)W';''-1'":';;''';'''
... ,-_i_" ,;i:,:;.-;:;)~", .• ....-_ .•. _.,c''''''''''''''''''"'I,;.'''!i.~.:>\.""~,,.''''W~'''lioi:''''''''i'''';''''''c,,,,,'!i;,"ii-''''~'''';~;:;'~i,;i'iili~-,'''~';'A_''::';'''".''''''&~~''''''~".'.
">'1:;;!it:;••
.,. .. .. ..
PANKHA
HELA
LALBEGI
MUSAHAR
PASI
THOR
SANSI
BAWARIA
BER1YA
SALVI
TIRGAR
BADHIK -
CHAMAR
SARBHANGI
SARGARA.
SINGIWALA
...•..•...
.. 14.
5.,BENGAL
•...
KAPARIYA
CHAMAR
KANJAR BAURI
I.Caste
..
.<~:
~...- nAMAI30.
-
J
"·
2.
I..-II. BHOGTA
4.
6.
10.9.
7.
.... .. ....
" 8.
23.
Synonym
TURAlHA
13.
12.
20.
21.
•• ~. ,,,i I' Ii.
-
"
BAGDI
BAHELIA
BANTAR
BELDAR
BHUlYA
BIND
BHUlMALI
..
Sub-caste
KORI
3. DABGAR
Synonym
WEST
.
.BHANTU
·...
KALABAZ
SHILPKAR
CHARMAKAR
PANKA
BANGALl
TARMALI
DOMAR
CHAUPAL
DHUSIA "..
Sub-caste
BASOR
BAD!
HARI
BAHELlYA
BALAHAR
KAPADIA
BALAI.
KARWAL SANSI
S. 3. BAIT!
i
29.
27.
..
..26. RABIDAS
RUIDAS
84
SAPERA
MUCH)
19.
28. KHATIK
22. SANSIYAPANIKA
~ r
24. S.
85
ApPllNDIX VII-Coned.
RISHI
MOCHI
NAT k
A.»~r~~w..~~~~~t!,;~~~\>~~,h.::.c"i:':' ~'.i.4iiIIIIB lliM;,~:
~t;~f~'.#~xi;:;·::j:"--·~, Lt';2,~;,i~~t!t~r~~~~~,~-~~,~,;,;;!<~<'~""'i~~~~'~~~;'~j'~~.~'di~,,~~~-_';-;"':~1i~,~~:~~~:~·~~:·i;;rA'··~~;~·~~~:W~~..f.:l~·"'ti_,
~.,."' ..".•••
"·~fiiid~i~J.~j~i~ll5~~ii,_ ~·i·~···ilii:l.",;"';,L
;~~~ '''.t. ." "il. ~~" -. :
t'
k:!
88 89
-I - ..
.14. i
..DHANUK 17. KAMOH
19. RESI ..
31. SAPELA ~18. No. ..
7. BATWAL
34.
35.
32.
SIPI
TELl
I:',
8. BANS!
BAZIGAR
SARDE .Caste
10.
''''',f4. .S.Sub-caste
27.
12.
13.
15.
26.
25.
24.
28.
29.
30. NAT
DAG!.
DAULE
DHAOGRI
LOHAR
MAZHABI
NECH
OD
PASI
CHANAL
DHAKI
PHRERA
.. ....
..NAGALU
RANA
GIARAH
DHAYA
KORI
BALMIKI
BHEDKUT ·. ~fIi
t:( 20.
23. KAROACK
JOGI
I VlI-Contd. I
If
i KOL! VII-Contd.
J..':
BANDHELA
MEHTAR
MAZHABI.
MEGHWAL
SANSI
BALMIKI
MADARI
SAPERA
Caste
33.
5.
9. SlKLIGAR
SIRKIBAND t .Synonym
CHAMAR 1.3.No.
36. AD-DHARMI
BHANG!
THATHIAR I.
21. KEER APPENDIX ApPENDIX
ILALBEG!
~1,r'
'J,.
6.
11. BARAD~
CHHIMBA i, 22. KHATIK
CHUHRA
16. DOOM
~:1It~
h,;i:
--r Synonym Sub-caste -'
~
=
r
BARAR
MOCHI
RAVIDASI
RAMDASIA
DHOBI
DARE!
TOORI
DRUAI
DOOMNA
BHANJRA
DAGOL!
JULAHA
..::~,
BANGALl
SARARE
SIRYARE
BADDI
HALL!
REHAR
THATHERA
..
I
t
".
f):'
it.'.
f"
J,
.. PATNI
DHUPI
MUCHI
LOI
YAITHIBI
GHASI
KALlNDI
DOMNAMASUDRA
PATNI
MUSAHAR
KEOT
KOTAL
MEHTOR
KOCH Caste
MAHISYADAS
10.
11.
15.
Caste 14.
13.
...
, DHOBI
9.No.
Sub-caste., ..
., ..
RAVIDAS
Sub-caste
Synonym
17.
KAN
12.
916.
ApPENDIX VII-Contd.
Synonym 8. JALIA KAIBARTA
16. NAMASUDRA 90
S.
F;,
24.
----.- .... ----.-
B.No. 23.
92 ----,--- S. ofAD!
(of the district
AKA East
HMAR
HOJAI
DAFLA
BANGRO
BUGUN
DHAMMAI
HAJONG
YENADI
GARO
DEORI
CHAKMA
APATANI
BANGNI
SAMANTA
THOTI
SAVARA
YERUKULA
-...
...
and
Kri·
Kri-
and
Godavari,
Godavari, Chit-Synonym
Tribe
Cuddapah,
Vishakhapat-
Adila-
Srika-
• .1.,
.. .. 93
HRUSSO
MIJI
Sub·tribe
KHOWA I! •
SAMANTU
- .,<..~'
9.
7.
3.
11- shna, West
toor)
Anantapur
Guntur,
Anantapur,
Throughout the State 6.
4. nam,
Kurnool,
nam, 12. Nellore,
27.25.
5. (of kakulam,
bad)
kulam,
2. 1.
13.
14.
10.
26.
includingNEFA
Vishakhapat-
the distJicts of Sri-
ASSAM
I
ApPENDIXVII-Con/d. ApPENDIX VII-Contd.
S. Tribe Synonym
No. Sub-tribe
8. JATAPU
9. KODU KONDH DESAYA KONDH
DONGRIA
KONDH
KUTIA KONDH
TIKIRIA KONDH
YENITY KONDH
10. KOLAM MANNE KOLAM
11. KONDA DORA KONDA KAPU CHINNA
KONDALU
PEDDA
KONDALU
12. KONDA REDDI HILL REDDI
.~,r;
I·IA.
13. KODU GOUDU
(of the Agency tracts) r
14. KOYA
!!fl.'; .
DORA CHATTAM '
,I,.
.J", GAMPA KOYA
DOLI KOYA
COMMU KOYA
I
I
~l1ftq GUTTA KOYA '
;, c:;-J
KAKA KOYA I
~.:;;;; ,H(
!,~',
W'li KUTTA KOYA
LINGA KOYA
I
'i>~.' ".~'
f~
;~K
KAMMARAKOYA
MATWA KOYA ,
MUSARA KOY A [
ODDI KOYA ~
~~:'
t ..· PATTIDI KOYA I
··~gI,: 15. KOTIA
RACHA KOYA I
BARTIKA I
, .,
y~ BENTHO ORIYA
DULlA I
1~:1l:
•.'.j.•..,...
~i.l;"ll:
PAlKO
I·····;:'.'·
. II
~;W PUTIYA
HOLVA
") .
SANROHA
":;i
SIDDOPAIKO I
'il 16. MANNE DORA I
i( .
17. MOOKA DORA NOOKA DORA
~"'.i' '
-'•....
18. NAIKPOD . I
!
.~~
;.
19. NAYAK ..
;;':
IBi'.I.;,.,:,.
I;::: :
(of the Agency tracts) f
~:':
P' 20. PARDHAN
ur'
~.'.;'. 21. PORJA
~i;:
~'"
[
~\
22. REDDI DORA
~~i'
LX
: +
}1
:"".
~:f
~, :
.. .. S.*. ,
NOCTE
SHERDUKPEN
SINGPHO
PAWl.
KHASI
NAGA
MIKIR
MONPA
BHUMIJ
BATHUDI
KHAMPTI
JAINTlA
LALUNG
MEMBA
KUKIVide
MAN.
BAIGA
YOBIN
WANCHO
TANGSA
RABHA
BEDIA
MIRI.
MISHMI
MIZO.
KHAMBA
LAKHER
ASUR
SULUNG
No. Tribe
(ofbagh,
nas i ..
IBIATE
Tribe
the
", ... .
BAKHAK
.. '~S
iHazari-
and
or BrETE
(I Sub-tribe
16Sub-tribe
of34.
Dhanbad)
Santhal
districts
para
Singhbhum, LUSEI
MARA
PNAR
26.
·28.
30.
Synonym
of32.
Synonym
24.
22.
95
...,94VII-Contd.
Parga-
2.
38.
4.
36.
the
37. Ranchi
Report.
-iI
,. BARO-KACHARI
ApPENDIX ,
TAMARIA
,~,
THADO
".\ BIHAR o. VAIPHEI
..
THANGNGEN
SUKTE
',I ... -!~.,.~ SITLHOU
UlBUH
NWAL
AM
'MEGAM
LHOUJEM
BHOI
KHOLHOU
KHOTHALONG
DIMASA
JONGBE
HAOLAI
HRANGKHWAL
HANNENG
CHANGSAN
GAMALHOU
RIANG
HONGSUNGH
or
RANGKHOL
KHELMA
HAUPIT
DOUNGEL I
'F'
f
DKILor
.KHAWATHLANG
WAR
LHOUVUN
HENGNA
GANGHTE
HAOKIP
CHONGLOI
LENGTHANG
KIPGEN
KHAWCHUNG or I 27.
25.
29.
31.
35.
39.
33.
21.
23.1.
5.
3. I f I
SINGSON
I ApPENDIXVII-Contd.
t,
I·
't"
I"
'l:':'::i
¢it
n :,'
r(
W'
.~ ':.:
"I···.···
I. "
·~I···
i _.
p,:'.' ..
~"
'h.~i~
li.",h:
~l["i'
/"
.... )
, ,,;
.•:n
!fi't,,""-
i··~··11L
·..·, '
I~:
I·WJ
'-,,1'"
.~ii:,::
:..:L'
..•..•.•.......
I"j'
...
".V.I:
" ..'..••.'.'.
if::
t!
i
11:
...
~{!'_:'
1.').;.
wh:
,r,;·,
:"
;:j
~~]
/,\'.
[if I
L:
~<
-_._---------~ .•_._,._".,'"
--,,-- - '\
~
fJ6 97
VII-Con/d.
----------------.----------------
ApPENDIX
S.
ApPENDIX VII-Con/d.
Synonym Sub-tribe Tribe Synonym Sub-tribe
No.
DHOLI BHIL
DUNGRIBHIL
DUNGRI GARASIA
:'1
GAMIT
'il GAMTA
ht.; GAVIT
MAVCHI
[;}! MEWASI BHIL
f( PADVI
1;[, PAWRA
h~i:""
(-."," RAWAL BHIL
TADVI
"~i'"- TETARIA
i',:i,'li
VALVI
n"
f- I', VASAVA
tt·l·'·- V.ASAVE
~.i>, 5. BHILALA ,
!~f..i:>:'~
.:tlU 6. CHARAN •.
(9f the Nesses of the
It;I,: Forest Division of
~'Ii LOHRA Rajkot, Gir and luna-
~~l~:·
.. gadh)
7. CHODHARA
t~,l
;-:.'
( t" SAURIA 8. CHAUDHARI .• i
PAHARIA (of the districts of Sural j
)
~. and Bulsar)
~):. KISAN 9. DHODlA • j
j
ffi~.::·, 10. DHOR-KOLI KOLI-DHOR j
.~\
~",~l;,
TOKRE-KOLI
II. DUBLA TALAVIA
HALPATI
1:,"lijt
;,:.J":; 12. KATKARI KATHODI DHOR KATKARI
, "~l ; -: "'-. or
I'~"·'~~'
~{I. GUJARAT , 911 ·DHOR KATIIODI
1. BAVACHA_ ~ SON KATKARI
2. BAMCHA .
~..
~., -- or '".
ff;!!' KOLCHA
13. NAUmA
KOKNA
KUNBI SON KA~I
w 3. BHARWAD . KOLGHA
ri' ' 14.
16.
15. (of the Danga district) KUKNA
~."
(of the Nesses of the
Forest Divisions of
F'
ii.
Rajkot, Gir and luna-
gadh). NAYAKA
f .•·, CHOLlVALA
t
f:L
f)""
4. BHIL . BARDA
BHAGALIA
BHILGARASIA
NAYAKA
KAPADIA
NAYAKA
DHANKA MOTA NAYAKA
---- .. -- .. -- NANA NAYAKA
_~;;;~,,:~1t Jt·""il-lf' .~~i;i.!.:!
-~.""'''"':l>.~.••'1iI!a~iL·""'·"" •.
'"d"j':1
'.. 1'.'ll,t ... .. ,'-
<'.Co''''
--
j""" _. I
I
98 99
'j.·.'I·M
.... ! I
'lrn APPENDIXVII-Contd.
,hi;; , ApPENDIXVIl-Contd.
II
} f! MADIA
ii
;>:,.
~ J
No.
102 12.
11. 16.
- PALLIYAN
PANIYAN
SHOLAGA
NARIKORA
PULAYAN
MUDUGAR
9.(of'MALAYALI
14. TODA
15.13.
10.
GO
Mudurai
Tribe .VAN
districts) &
UNDER
Coimbatore
. MUDUVAN 103
KURIVIKKARAN
Sub-tribe
Synonym
S.
MAHARASHTRA
ApPENDIXVJl-Contd.
ApPENDIXVII-Contd.
No.
27.
-
26.
32. PARDHI
MUNDA
31. ORAON
29.
28. PARDHAN
NAGASIA
Tribe
S. MAJI'IWAR
MAJHI
30. PAO
NAGESIA
DHANGAD
DHANKA
KUDA
KUDUKH
PATHARI SARon
ii
BAHELIA CHITA PARDHI
BAHELLIA LANGOLI PAR-
DHI
SHIKARI PHANS j
TAKANKAR PARDH[ 1. AGARIA t
TAKIA
2. ·ANDH
33. PARJA 'j
3. ASUR ~
34. SAUNTA
4. BHARIA BHUIYAN 1
35. SAUR SEHARIARA WAT BHUINHAR J
BHUMIA
36. SAWAR
SONR II
SAWARA 5. BHIL . BARDA j
SHABAR BHAGALIA
j
37. SEHARIA SEHR BHIL-GARASIA
SOSIA DHOLI-BHIL
DUNGRIBHIL
DUNGRI-
GARASIA
MADRAS MAVCHI
1. IRULAR MEV ASI-BHIL
PADVI
2. KADAR PAWARA
3. KANIKARAN . KANIKKAR RAWAL-BHIL
(of Kanyakumari TADVI
district and Shen- VALVI
kotah taluk of
Tirunelveli
trict)
dis-
6. BHILALA VASAVA '<~~'.
7. BHIMMA
4. KATTUNAYAKAN
5. KOTA 8. BHUNJIA
6. KURUMBA 9. BINJHWAR
(of Nilgiris dis-
if:
.'t· trict) 10. DHANKA TETARIA
'·lj':
7. KURUMAN 11. DHANWAR
"Ii:; 8. MALASAR
,iff!,j'
Ill; i
Ilb,"k·
ft
IW
~t::
104 105
VII--Contd.
ApPENDIX
------------------------------.--.--------
S. Tribe ___________ m •• __ .._.~ __ ••._ .•
ApPENDIX VII-con/d.
_
Synonym Sub-tribe S. Sub-tribe
No. Synonym
-------------------------- ------- ..
No. Tribe
.----------- ---------------------
12. DHODJA ... DHODI NAGARCHI
(of the districts of NAGWANSHI
Greater Bombay, Tha- NAIKPOD
na, Kolaba, Ratnagiri, OJHA
Nasik, Dhulia, Jal- SONJHARI
gaon, Ahmednagar, JHAREKHA
Poona, Satara, SangH, THATIAor
ShoJapur and Kolha- THOTIA
pur)
.
HALPATI
13. DHOR KOLI
TOKREKOLI
TALAVIA 17. KANDH
19.
KOLIDHOR HALBA ..
18. HALBI
KAMAR
KATHODI
KROND I
KONDH
20. KATKARJ
14. DUBLA ... I
(of the districts of
Greater Bombay, Tha-
na, Kolaba, Ratnagiri,
Nasik, Dhulia, Jal- DHOR
gaon, Ahmednagar, KATKARI or
Poona, Satara, Sangli, DHOR KA-
Sholapur and Kolha- THODI
pur) SON KA TKARI
15. GA VIT GAMTA GAMIT or SON KA-
16. GOND KOlTUR ARAKH THODI
BADA MADIA 21. KAWAR KANWAR CHATTRI
BHATOLA KAUR CHERWA
CHHOT A MADIA RATHIA
DANDAMI TANWAR
MADIA
DHULlA 22. KHARWAR
DHURU or
DHURWA ""23. KOKNA ... KOKNI
DHOBA (of the districts of KUKNA
DORLA Greater Bombay, Tha-
GAJKI na, Kolaba, Ratnagiri,
GAITA Nasik, Dhulia, Jalgaon,
GATTA or Ahmednagar, Poona,
GATTI Satara, SangH, Shola-
GONDGOWARI pur and Kolhapur).
KALANGA 24. KOL .
KANDRA
KOYA 25. KOLCHA KOLGA "::~--"
KHIRWAR 26. KOLAM
"'~
KOLLAWARK MANNE
~~ KUCHA MADIA PUJARAK
r~; KUCHAKI
MADIA 27. KORKU MOUASI BONDEYA
MACHALIR BONDHI
.;';~.
;1'. MADIA BOPCHI
t MANA NIHALor
MANNEWAR NAHUL
MUDlA
* Vide para 16 of the Report.
,;f;
i~'r
!,:'.,
lr.
..:.
~.~iI}
f.~':·'·
',~~h:':~-tf1~~~~~'1l:~i\i---
'-~ii";-:i:-~2f' f'~~"':J;:;:i:k>ii';~j;j~;'_' ••••• - •••••••• ".
.:f~i'-"----- I
106 f07
I
II
I
I
ApPENDIX VII-Contd. MPENDIX VlI-Contd. i,
~( .
L3Deptt of SS/65-8
~i:
t:il ..
~"
fl· --
!.,..
·~~;i":f:;:},~{~:>,~"1ir~:;Pj';'liIi;·'~~'!IIMllllJir.a..:'~~~,,;.'.;;.
~'tJ.;,""'~.'jii"':;~;~'Ji;'\$'''iIl..
:\
Iii..
('.!ill '-:., .• ~~C"~,,
" •. . - -
109
108 ApPENDIX VII-Con/d.
Synonym Sub-tribe
ApPENDIX VII·-Contd. s. Tribe
No.
Synonym Sub-tribe
S
No. ,Tribe ORISSA
.'\;
"i~~·
.••.".'
NAGALAND
1. GARO
*2. KACHARI
'l;i
,
'j:, *3. KUKI
~t 4. MIKIR
I\f\
ji:!
*5. NAGA
"..1\.
e'~
~~f .•_
-- ---------
·..5...
GANDlA12.
II..-
I! ..---------.
.. Sub-tribe
Kaimur
Kaimur range).
· . BHOTA
.... .. .. ..range).
.·..
RAJASTHAN ----
·GAMET! ---
------.-.----
.•..------. TOLEHA
the 2. Rajput).
MARCHHA I -
-~ RAJGOND
..1. JAD
JAUHARIA
7. APPENDIX
6. 4. .---
5. .•.-.. -.--- VII-Colltd.
6.--.".---- _.~-
- OJHA
I pur
pur ·. ..URAM
BffiL
DAMARIA MlNA·110
district
district south of the · . KHASA JAUN-
_ ..
·--.
THARUA BUKSA
GOND
AGARIA
BHOTIA
JAUNSARI
CHERO
23.. Tribe
KOL
MAJHWAR.
DOMBA
GARASIA.
KHAIRWAR
KATHODI
CHOWKIDAR
BAIGA
MAHALl
MUNDA
MIRDHA
DAMOR.
BHUINYA
RAJUAR
SANTAL
BETA.
MATYA
BODH.
BHIL
SEHARIA
MALHARKOLI
LODHA
PENTlA
SWANGLA
NAGESIA
SAURA
KHARWAR
KORA
OMANATYA
CHAN
KANET j Chota
. (of
,-.;;,~--
4.
1.
lD.MINA
NAYAK KORWA
S. and ·UTTAR
BHUIYAR
.GARA
Synonym
MUNDARI
KISAN
SEOK
SAHARA
Synonym .(of the111
MUNDA-LOHARA .
Mirza-
PRADESH
3. . ..
8. ·(excluding
Sub-tribe DHURIYA
13. No.ORAON (of the Mirza-
PATHARI
-- ..--MADIA SAVAR
9 . SARI, viz. Brahmin and
32.
I I
\
•.f'!
n:!l::
.. I
· .4,BANMANUS .,11
,I
:1
BENGAL
SAVAR
HO
BHUTlA
MUNDA
BEDlA
SAHARIA
MAGH
MRU.
MECH
GORAIT
LOHARA
MAHALI
-_._~------
..SAHARIA
TlBETAN
-.--
___
MALPAHARIYA
BHAG
n --
--.-----.---.
-.--- .----.-...
...·
~ S. Sub-tribe
TribePRADESH
..
- .RAWAT I.1._______
2.
4.
.. ,.:.:~~,~.
-
-..
3.
.. --" .--.
YOLMO 29.
KATHODT
5.
BEDlYA
Synonym
KUMAR
MAHU BODH
BANJARA
ANDAMANESE
JARAWA
SANTAL
NAYAKA
No...
KISAN
DUGPA
3.HALPATI
DUBLA
KOKNA
BANRAWAT
KHARIA ....
SENTINELESE
ONGE
. ..
..
27.
PARAHAIYA
._.___.___.u._. ___.__ "·____
.. Sub-tribe
. ORAON ANDAMAN
5. NICOBARESE
.. 25.
24.
26.
. & NICOBAR
NAGESJA
2. JAD
31. SHERPA KATKARI
HIMACHAL
ISLANDS
1. TOTO
VARLT
113
R. 32,7.
KAGATAYDHODIA
NAIKDA
!ApPENDIX
KHAMPA
BOTH
6. SHOMPEN.
6. KOLGHA
--
VII-Contd. - .. LAMBA
.-.-_._-.
DADRA & NAGAR HA VELI
-<,;. ••••.•
12. 18.
19. 2.
30. DHOR-KOLt
28. RABlIA
KARMALI
112 I \1
ll$it:
all!:
"[1"
tlnL
i~',
....
~.
('
~m;,
ftw;
<
~m~'
I
m"l
!."
J,~1~'
'LilII'
i.~;.il
, I'm
j'V,
'"'\
3l'A:
.l\j'
i§~ll
gi(.iI
:·,1'1
~"'i:1
~'
I~!,~,
-tl·,.,
~~"'."
..
ii.' ,
~
~.
i
!&I"
t ...•
i_~j'
,
~)l:
~~i
,,'I·
~1
';;;,
~,
H~;·
~~t
!r'
r~ '
r
"':;j:~Q'~ilifi~\:~i
..'. '<:.:i·~·;b);;r·i.> '~~ "-"'YlIIIiWl~~~
~"",,,t.it;'<t~'~'
.._.';';:~.~:J.~,:,' :~~ •••.........-....'.""
.••..•..
,.,., .•.
114 115
VII--Col1cld.
ApPENDIX VII-Contd. -.--.--------------------------
------------ ..
ApPENDIX
Sub-tribe
S. Sub-tribe S. Tribe Synonym
Tribe Synonym
No. No.
RAVERI
MEL.<\CHERI
PANGWALA
THAKHRU KINNAURA TRIPURA
3. MALUMI
LAHAULA
KANAURA ISLANDS
3.
2.
5.
4. AMINDIVI MUNDA
UCHAI
LUSHAI
1. CHAKMA
LACCADlVE, MINICOY AND 11. 10.
13. 6.
9.
12. KHARIA
4.
16.
14.
17.
3.
15.
5. KUKI
NOATIA
7.
MAG.
2.
8.
18. KHASI
GARO
KOL
TIPPERA
JAMATIA
SABAR
ORAON
SANTAL
HALAM
KANDH
RIANG
19.
KHASIA
MANIPUR
3. MlZO.
4. NAGA ANGAM[
KABUl
KACHA NAGA
MAO
MARAM
TANGKHUL
-- LjM3 Deptt.- of SSj65-2,OOO-28-9-65-GIPF.