Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
IEEE ANTENNAS
ON AND PROPAGATION, VOL. AP-31, NO. 2, MARCH 1 9 8 3
- -
ce
The relation between and Em according to (2) is -
-L
1 - E X R ) = Em2(E, El). (42)
G e l =-p [V X G m 2 -j6(R-E’)]. (3 3)
These symmetrical relations, of course, can be proved without
knowing theexplicit expressions for these functions.
In view of (32): we obtain
-
- 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Gel=, [(BX~,)U,+(BX~i2)U---~6(R-R’)],
k relation
dyadic
The
theuse of (30) in this work is prompted
by a recent work of Dr. P. H. Pathak, where a similar relation in
(34) the vector level was used t o discuss the dyadic Green’s function
where for a waveguide. The communication from Dr. Pathak for a pre-
publication copy of his paper is gratefully acknowledged.
Coofieoo(~k~~oo(Tk)
REFERENCES
[I] C. T. Tai,“Eigenfunctionexpansion of dyadicGreen’sfunctions,”
Air Force Weapons Lab., Kirtland Air Force Base, NM, Math. Note
28, July 1973.
[2] C. T. Tai, Dyadic Green’s
Functions in Electromagnetic
Theory. Scranton, PA: Intext,1971.
(35) [3] C. T.Tai and P. Rozenfeld, “Different
representations of dyadic
Green’s functions for a rectangular cavity,” IEEE Trans. Microwave
Theor). Tech., vol. MTT-24, pp. 597-601, Sept. 1976.
Following the same procedure,
it can be shown that [4] W . A. Johnson, A. Q . Howard, and D. G. Dudley, “On the irrotational
component of the electric Green’s dyadic,” Radio Sci., vol. 14, pp.
(36) 961-967.Nov.1979.
[5] M. Abramovits and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of MathematicalFunc-
with rions. Washington, DC: NationalBureau of Standards, U.S. Gov-
- ernment Printing Offlce, 1964. p. 374.
(37)
Effect of Substrate Thickness on the Performance of a
Circular-Disk Microstrip Antenna
and J. S . DAHELE AND KAI F. LEE, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE
INTRODUCTION
The basic geometry of the circular-disk microstrip antenna is
shown in Fig. l(a), while Fig. l(b) shows the electric field at the
edge of the disk. The parallel-plate effect between the disk and
the ground plane causes the fringing field to extend beyond the
edge of the disk. This increases the capacitance between the disk
(39) and the ground plane, resulting in the lowering of the resonant
frequency. The effect of the additional capacitance due to the
Thiscompletesour derivation forthe various dyadic Green’s fringing field can be accounted €or byintroducingan effective
functions for a coaxial line. From these explicit expressions it is radius for the disk which is larger than its physical radius [ l ] .
seen that
Manuscript received August9, 1982.
=w R’)
Ge (R’, R)= l(z,
The authors are with the Department of Electronics, The Chinese Uni-
versity of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
i" RgXchl
1
200
100
E !
(bl
Fig. 1. (a) Microstrip circular disk geometry. (b) Electric field at edge of
circular disk.
Fig. 2. Real part (I?)and imaginary part (X)of input impedance as func-
tion of frequency with t as parameter.
where
conductor of the feed first passes through a hole in thebase plate
to form a SO-L2 line. It then passes through the substrate and is
soldered to the surface of the disk.
For the fundamental mode Theinputimpedanceofeach diskismeasured witha GR
admittance meter, and its value is referred to a short circuit plane
K,2,m =IC,, = 1.84118 coincident with the copper ground plane. Our measurements are
confined to a frequency range below 1 GHz, the frequency being
8.791 X IO3 read directly from theoscillator scale.
.: f , =
re ff VG
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
where f, is in megahertz and reff is in centimeters.
The value off, in (1) is accurate to within 2.5 percent, pro- For each disk the input impedance is measured as a function
vided r/f > 1 [ l ] . As the resonant frequency decreases, the disk of frequency, and the results for t = 0.318 cm, 0.159 cm, and
radius increases so that, for a normal range of values of r, r/t 9 1 0.08 cm are shown in Fig. 2. The H-plane radiation patternsmeas-
and reff approaches r. This has led to the assumption that below ured at the resonant frequency of each disk are shown in Fig. 3.
2 GHz the effect of substrate thickness on resonant frequency is From Fig. 2 we note that ast decreases, the resonant frequency
negligible [ I ] . However, this assumption is not supported by our increases, the bandwidth decreases, and both the real and imagi-
experimental results which show that even below 1 GHz this ef- nary parts of the input impedance decrease. The relationship be-
fect is not negligible. Moreover, our resultsshow that substrate tween the increase in resonant frequency and the decrease in sub-
thickness also has a significant effect on the input impedance and strate thickness i s not linear; the frequency shift is larger when t
bandwidth. decreases from 0.318 cm to 0.159 cm comparedwiththe case
Inthisexperimentalstudy we examinethree circular-disk when t decreases from 0.159 cm to 0.08 cm. This behavior agrees
microstrip antennas, with substrate thicknesst = 0.318 cm. 0.159 with the results calculated from (1) as shown in Table I, wheref,
cm? and 0.08 cm. The disks are identical in all other respects. The is the resonant frequency and 4f, is the difference between the
disks are etched on RT/Duroid 5870 material with relative per- resonant frequencies corresponding to t = 0.08 cm and 0.159 cm
mittivity of 2.32. The copper backing is retained and forms the and f = 0.159 cm and 0.318 cm.
ground plane. 411 disks have a radius of 6.8 cm, and the coaxial Theseresultsshow that the effect of substratethicknesson
feed is located 6.5 ctn fromthecenter.Thisfeedposition is the resonant frequency is not negligible. Given the narrow band-
chosen in order to obtain a large radiationresistance [2]. The width of these antennas, it is importanttochoosethecorrect
disks are mounted on separate base plates and positioned accurately value of t. It is clear from Fig. 2 that with our particular geometry,
with locating pins. The feed consists of an omni spectra miniature a designerrequiring an antennaat829 MHz mustchoose f =
(OSM) connector mounted underneath the base plate. The center 0.159 cm. Choosing t = 0.08 cm and t = 0.318 cm will reduce
360 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. AP-31, NO. 2, MARCH 1 9 8 3