Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

RESEARCH PROJECT - RUBRICS - CRITERIA FOR ORAL PRESENTATION

CONTENT & TOPIC DEVELOPMENT


1.0 -​ Topic is ​fully​ developed and prompt is ​fully​ answered.
0.75 - Topic is ​mostly​ developed and prompt is ​mostly​ answered.
0.5 -​ Topic is ​partially​ developed and prompt is ​partially​ answered.
0.25 - Topic is ​partially​ developed and prompt is ​partially​ answered, but there is ​significant deviation​ from the topic/ prompt.
0 - ​Topic is ​poorly​ developed and prompt is ​poorly​ answered, and there are ​repeated instances of deviation​ from the topic/
prompt.

CLARITY & ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS


1.0 -​ Information is ​very effectively​ conveyed in a ​sophisticated, coherent​ manner. ​A range of​ cohesive devices are ​effectively
used.
0.75 - Information is ​clearly​ conveyed, in a ​logical​ manner. Cohesive devices are ​appropriately​ used.
0.5 -​ Information is ​clearly​ conveyed in a ​less intuitive​ order, which may be ​challenging to follow​ at times. ​Few​ cohesive devices
are used, but they are ​mostly accurate​.
0.25 - Information is ​mostly clear​ but ​poorly organized​, rendering it ​difficult to follow​ the presentation. Cohesive devices are used,
but they are ​often inaccurate​.
0 -​ Information is ​unclear​ and ​poorly organized​. ​No​ cohesive devices are used, or they are ​inaccurate​.

PRONUNCIATION
1.0 - ​Speech is ​clear and easily understood​. Words are ​enunciated​, and mispronunciation ​very rarely​ occurs and causes ​no
misunderstanding​. There is ​natural control​ of keywords.
0.75 - ​Occasional​ mispronunciation of words ​hardly ever interferes​ with understanding. Words are ​mostly enunciated​, and there is
effective control​ of keywords, with ​some instances of self-correction​.
0.5 -​ ​Occasional​ mispronunciation of words ​interferes​ with understanding. Words are ​sometimes unclear​, and there is ​good
control of keywords, with ​several instances of self-correction​.
0.25 - ​Frequent​ mispronunciation ​hinders​ understanding. Words are ​often unclear​, and there is ​some​ control of keywords, with
rare instances of self-correction​.
0 - ​Speech ​predominantly incomprehensible​ due to mispronunciation. Words are ​unclear​, and there is ​little to no​ control of
keywords, with ​few to no instances of self-correction​.

LANGUAGE RANGE & ACCURACY


1.0 - ​Language structures and lexis are ​competently​ used to convey meaning. Language accuracy and range are ​at or above
level​. ​Effective​ paraphrasing occurs.
0.75 - Language structures and lexis are ​competently​ used to convey meaning. Language accuracy and range are ​usually at level​,
with ​very few​ slips, which are ​self-corrected​. ​Some​ effective paraphrasing occurs.
0.5 - ​Language structures and lexis are ​appropriately​ used to convey meaning. Language accuracy and range are ​usually at level​,
with ​some​ slips, which are ​mostly self-corrected​. ​Little​ paraphrasing occurs.
0.25 - Language structures and lexis are ​poorly​ used to convey meaning. Language accuracy and range are ​below level​, with
several slips​, which are ​rarely self-corrected​. ​Little to no​ paraphrasing occurs.
0 -​ Language structures and lexis are ​very poorly​ used to convey meaning. Language accuracy and range are​ considerably below
level​, with ​several slips​, which are ​not self-corrected​. ​No​ paraphrasing occurs.

FLUENCY & PRESENTATION SKILLS


1.0 -​ Presentation is ​well prepared and devised​, and is delivered ​very naturally​. It is ​engaging and entertaining​, and ​fits the format​.
0.75 - Presentation is ​well prepared and devised​, and is delivered ​mostly naturally​. It is ​sometimes engaging and entertaining​, and
fits the format​.
0.5 -​ Presentation is ​mostly well prepared and devised​, but is delivered with ​considerable​ instances of ​hesitation and interruptions​.
It is ​sometimes monotonous​, but ​fits the format​.
0.25 - Presentation is ​poorly prepared and devised​, and is delivered with ​repeated​ instances of ​hesitation and interruptions​. It is
mostly monotonous​, and ​does not fit the format​.
0 -​ Presentation is ​very poorly prepared and devised​, and is delivered with ​repeated​ instances of ​hesitation and interruptions​. It is
monotonous​, and ​does not fit the format​. The speaker seems ​unengaged​.
ERICK TRISTÃO - U. S. GOVERNMENT - FALL 2017