Name of Employee: CHERRY S. ABALON Name of Rater: DR. MOISES D. LABIAN
Position: Secondary School Principal-I Position: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SECONDARY/DON JUAN F. AVALON NHS/NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review: TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT Rating Score* KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) R E T Ave ACCESS Increase June, 2015 5% 5- 1,700 or more students are To expand enrolment enrolled in Grade 7-11. children’s from 1,500 to 4- 1,500 or more students are access to 1,700 in Grade enrolled in Grade 7-11. education. 7-11 3-1,499 are enrolled in Grade 7-11 2-1,300 students are enrolled in Grade 7-11 1-1,200 and below are enrolled in Grade 7-11 Decrease July- 5% 5- 0% Drop out from Grade 7 to drop-out rate February,20 Grade 11. from 2% to 15 4-1% Drop out from Grade 7 to 11 1%. 2-1.5 Drop out rate from Grade 7to11 1-2% Dropout ratefrom Grade 7 to 11
To increase June- 5% 5- 5% increase normal nutritional
2%-5% normal March,2015 status of students from Grade 7-10. nutritional 4-4% increase normal nutritional status of status of students from Grade 7-10. students from 3-3% increase normal nutritional Grade 7-10 status of students from Grade 7-10. 2- 2% increase normal nutritional status of students from Grade 7-10. 1-1% increase normal nutritional status of students from Grade 7-10. QUALITY School Increase NCAE August,2015 5% 5- Increased 1% NCAE result Achievement performancefr 4-Increased .5% NCAE result om .5% to 1% 3-Decreased .5% NCAE result 2-Decreased 1%NCAE result Increase NAT March, 2015 5% 5- Increased 1% NCAE result performancefr 4-Increased .5% NCAE result om .5% to 1% 3-Decreased .5% NCAE result 2-Decreased 1%NCAE result Increase 3%- June- 5% 5- 75% of the Students from Grade 5% March,2015 7-11 are Independent Readers Independent 4-50% of the students from Grade Level Reading 7-11 are Indenpendent Readers Performance 3- 45% of the Students from Grade 7-11 are Independent Readers 2-30% of the students from Grade 7-11 are Independent Readers 1-20% of the students from Grade 7-11 are Independent Readers Governance School Provide safe June- 25% 5-Supported by evidence such as Leadership,M and child March,2015 school policy reports, information anagement friendly materials, advocacy and Operation learning and activities,regular school meetings,inventory environment. -Adhered to Child-Environment Standards and Programs -Institutionalized Child Protection mechanisms and processes(per DepEd Order 40 s. 2012) -Provided ICT facilities/workshop rooms as learning support systems -Has clear DRRM mobilization plans 4-All mechanisms are present except for some minimal requirements 3- All mechanisms are present but without evidences 2- Incomplete mechanisms and absence of reports 1-Mechanisms and reports are missing. Provide June- 25% 5-All teachers are provided with technical March,2015 technical assistance with assistance to corresponding evidences: teachers on Teachers protfolio matters containing observation pertaining to reports,TSNA results, enhancement performance analysis and of classroom recommendations for management, development interventions skills and performance contracts and instructional performance evaluation competence results in prescribed tools. and to non- Performed RPMS process in teaching all school personnel with personnel for the following evidences: support Performance contracts, services and performance within the evaluation results in RPMS cycle prescribed tools and proposed development plans. 4-At least 75% of school personnel provided with technical assistance with the required evidences. 3- At least 70% of school personnel provided with technical assistance with the required evidences. 2- At least 60% of school personnel provided with technical assistance with the required evidences. 1- At least 50% and belowof school personnel provided with technical assistance with the required evidences. Establish June- 15% 5-Has stakeholders school and March,2015 partnership/mobilization plan family and (complete with reports and community documentations of partnership meetings,agreements) for -Organized programs with performance stakeholders,especially parents for academic and other purposes(esp. Strategic planning) -Obtained resources for the school through stakeholders partnership. 4- Has mobilization plan and occassionally meets stakeholders in meetings and activities but some elements (e.g. not enough resources raised) 3- Has mobilization plan and occassionally meets stakeholders but not resulting to resources generated and evidences are missing. 2-Poor mobilization skills and seldom meets stakeholders. 1-No evidence in this area.