Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Background: Mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis is associated with the number of failing organs
and the severity and reversibility of organ dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the significance
of early systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in the development of multiorgan dysfunction
syndrome (MODS) and death from acute pancreatitis.
Methods: Data for all patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis between January 2000 and December
2004 were reviewed. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation
(APACHE) II scores and presence of SIRS were recorded on admission and at 48 h. Marshall organ
dysfunction scores were calculated during the first week of presentation. Presence of SIRS and raised
serum CRP levels on admission and at 48 h were correlated with the cumulative organ dysfunction
scores in the first week.
Results: A total of 759 patients with acute pancreatitis were identified, of whom 45 (5·9 per cent) died
during the index admission. SIRS was identified in 162 patients on admission and was persistent in 138
at 48 h. The median (range) cumulative Marshall score in patients with persistent SIRS was significantly
higher than that in patients in whom SIRS resolved and in those with no SIRS (4 (0–12), 3 (0–7) and
0 (0–9) respectively; P < 0·001). Thirty-five patients (25·4 per cent) with persistent SIRS died from
acute pancreatitis, compared with six patients (8 per cent) with transient SIRS and four (0·7 per cent)
without SIRS (P < 0·001). No correlation was observed between CRP level on admission and Marshall
score (P = 0·810); however, there was a close correlation between CRP level at 48 h and Marshall score
(P < 0·001).
Conclusion: Persistent SIRS is associated with MODS and death in patients with acute pancreatitis and
is an early indicator of the likely severity of acute pancreatitis.
Presented to the Quincentenary Congress of The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, June 2005
Paper accepted 16 November 2005
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.bjs.co.uk). DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5290
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Severity of acute pancreatitis 739
Similarly the severity of multiorgan dysfunction has been patient had two or more of the following8 : temperature
described in terms of clear physiological and biochemical greater than 38◦ C or less than 36◦ C, heart rate greater
variables. Marshall et al.10 have developed a widely used than 90 beats per min, respiratory rate above 20 breaths
and validated multiorgan dysfunction score to classify per min, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide of less
the degree of physiological derangement associated with than 32 mmHg, and white cell count greater than 12 000
organ dysfunction. A recent review of 121 patients with or less than 4000 cells/mm3 .
severe acute pancreatitis emphasized the dynamic nature Organ dysfunction scores were calculated at 24 h, 48 h
of multiorgan dysfunction in this patient population11 . and 1 week using the criteria proposed by Marshall et al.10 .
Buter et al.11 found that some patients who presented This widely used and validated system employs defined
with significant organ dysfunction made a complete physiological measures for each of five organ systems;
recovery with appropriate therapy, and documented that however, in this study the hepatic score was excluded to
persistent or deteriorating organ dysfunction was the only avoid the possibility of confounding effects due to biliary
independent predictor of death in patients with severe obstruction. Organ dysfunction was defined as a Marshall
acute pancreatitis. The criterion for recruitment to the score of 2 or more for each organ system10 . If this score
above study was an admission Acute Physiology And increased during the first 7 days or if organ dysfunction
Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score greater (Marshall score of 2 or more) developed in another organ
than 6; therefore, the presence and significance of an early system, the patient was considered to have deteriorating
systemic inflammatory response and its relationship with MODS11 . Cumulative Marshall organ dysfunction scores
multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death in were calculated as the sum of organ dysfunction scores for
an unselected population of patients with acute pancreatitis each of the four organ systems10 .
remains to be determined. Severe acute pancreatitis was defined as acute pancre-
The aim of the present study was to examine the atitis associated with an APACHE II score greater than
prevalence of SIRS in patients with acute pancreatitis 6, a Marshall score greater than 2 affecting one or more
regardless of aetiology and severity, and to assess the organ system, or the development of local complications of
significance of the inflammatory response during the first pancreatitis in line with the Atlanta consensus document
48 h in the development and severity of MODS and death definition14 . Mortality was calculated as the number of
from acute pancreatitis. patients dying during the index hospital admission with
pancreatitis.
Patients and methods
All patients who presented with acute pancreatitis between Statistical analysis
January 2000 and December 2004 were identified from a
prospectively collected Lothian surgical audit database12 Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version
and reviewed retrospectively. Acute pancreatitis was 12 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA) statistical software.
defined as an increase in serum amylase concentration To avoid distributional assumptions, values were stated
of three times the upper limit of the normal value in as median (range) and non-parametric statistical tests
association with typical symptoms of acute pancreatitis, (χ2 , Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis) were used. Survival
computed tomographic evidence of acute pancreatitis, or was analysed with the Kaplan–Meier method and log
the diagnostic finding of pancreatic inflammation and rank test. Cox’s regression analysis was used to identify
saponification made at the time of laparotomy in patients factors collected in the first 48 h that were independent
with a normal serum amylase level. Patients with chronic predictors of mortality during the index presentation, and
or recurrent acute pancreatitis were excluded. stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify
Data for all surgical admissions during the study period independent predictors of the development of persistent
were recorded on standard admission proformas, which or deteriorating MODS. The diagnostic odds ratio was
were supplemented by retrospective chart review and determined for each predictor at the optimal cut-off levels
cross-referenced against the hospital laboratory database. (age greater than 60 years, APACHE II score of less than
For each patient with acute pancreatitis, details of age, 8, persistent SIRS, and Glasgow outcome score below 4).
sex, variables pertaining to APACHE II and Glasgow Univariate linear regression analysis was used to assess
outcome scores13 , serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, the relationship between serum CRP levels and maximal
and presence or absence of SIRS were collected in the first cumulative Marshall scores. P < 0·050 was considered
24 h and at 48 h. SIRS was deemed to be present if the statistically significant.
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
740 R. Mofidi, M. D. Duff, S. J. Wigmore, K. K. Madhavan, O. J. Garden and R. W. Parks
Results
Circulatory system Renal system
Between January 2000 and December 2004, 759 con- 114 patients 78 patients
secutive patients (388 men and 371 women) with a Median score 2 (2–4) 14 Median score 2 (2 – 4)
median age of 57 (range 18–93) years presented with
acute pancreatitis. The aetiology of acute pancreatitis was 3
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Severity of acute pancreatitis 741
Odds ratio P
8
Age 0·99 (0·97, 1·00) 0·095
APACHE II score 0·74 (0·56, 0·98) 0·030
6 Glasgow outcome score (48 h) 1·09 (0·97, 1·23) 0·156
Persistent SIRS (48 h) 8·24 (5·47, 12·43) <0·001
Serum CRP (48 h) 1·00 (0·97, 1·00) 0·790
4
0
Table 3 Clinical predictors of survival in the first 48 h of
No SIRS Transient SIRS Persistent SIRS
presentation assessed using Cox’s regression analysis
Fig. 3 Box and whisker plot comparing the cumulative Marshall
Odds ratio P
multiorgan dysfunction scores between patients who had no
systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (n = 543 Age 0·73 (0·6, 0·89) 0·005
patients), patients with transient SIRS (n = 74) and those with APACHE II score 5·15 (2·40, 11·10) <0·001
persistent SIRS (n = 138). The thick black lines represent Glasgow outcome score (48 h) 0·91 (0·72, 1·15) 0·450
Persistent SIRS (48 h) 3·63 (2·50, 5·25) <0·001
median values, boxes represent the interquartile range, whiskers
Serum CRP (48 h) 1·00 (0·99, 1·01) 0·310
represent the outliers, and the individual circles denote extreme
values. P < 0·001 (Kruskal–Wallis test)
Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals. APACHE,
Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation; SIRS, systemic
inflammatory response syndrome; CRP, C-reactive protein.
600
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
742 R. Mofidi, M. D. Duff, S. J. Wigmore, K. K. Madhavan, O. J. Garden and R. W. Parks
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Severity of acute pancreatitis 743
surrogate marker of the severity of the consequences of 5 Kingsnorth A. Role of cytokines and their inhibitors in acute
the systemic inflammatory response and identify the larger pancreatitis. Gut 1997; 40: 1–4.
number of patients who, without close monitoring and 6 Formela LJ, Galloway SW, Kingsnorth AN. Inflammatory
organ support, are at risk of death from acute pancreatitis. mediators in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 6–13.
7 Mayer J, Rau B, Gansauge F, Beger HG. Inflammatory
The close association between early persistent SIRS and
mediators in human acute pancreatitis: clinical and
cumulative Marshall score highlights the usefulness of this
pathophysiological implications. Gut 2000; 47: 546–552.
observation as an early prognostic indicator. Moreover,
8 Bone RC. Immunologic dissonance: a continuing evolution
these data suggest that persistent SIRS and admission in our understanding of the systemic inflammatory response
APACHE II score are independent predictors of the syndrome (SIRS) and the multiple organ dysfunction
development of persistent MODS and death from acute syndrome (MODS). Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 680–687.
pancreatitis. 9 Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Costigan M, Hwang T,
In recent years there has been increasing interest in Davis CD, Wensel RP. The natural history of the systemic
the use of early goal-directed therapy in the management inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective
of patients with SIRS and septic shock in the intensive study. JAMA 1995; 273: 117–123.
care setting21 . Goal-directed therapy involves adjustments 10 Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR,
of cardiac preload, afterload and contractility to optimize Sprung CL, Sibbald WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a
the delivery of oxygen to the tissues. Recent randomized reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care
Med 1995; 23: 1638–1652.
controlled trials have revealed that early goal-directed
11 Buter A, Imrie CW, Carter CR, Evans S, McKay CJ.
therapy is associated with stabilization of physiological
Dynamic nature of early organ dysfunction determines
resuscitation endpoints such as heart rate, mean arterial outcome in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2002; 89:
pressure, central venous oxygen saturation, arterial lactate 298–302.
concentration and base deficit22,23 , as well as improvements 12 Aitken RJ, Nixon SJ, Ruckley CV. Lothian surgical audit: a
in the subsequent APACHE II and organ dysfunction 15-year experience of improvement in surgical practice
scores23 . Rivers et al.23 reported that early goal-directed through regional computerised audit. Lancet 1997; 350:
therapy in the setting of severe sepsis and septic shock 800–804.
was associated with a reduced in-hospital mortality rate. 13 Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neill J, Gilmour WH, Carter DC.
The presence of persistent or developing SIRS in patients Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 1984; 25:
with acute pancreatitis could be used to identify a cohort 1340–1346.
of patients who might similarly benefit from early goal- 14 Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for
acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium
directed therapy. This hypothesis remains to be examined
on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through
by a randomized clinical trial.
13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 586–590.
This study has highlighted the association between
15 de Beaux AC, Goldie AS, Ross JA, Carter DC, Fearon KCH.
the acute systemic inflammatory response and the Serum concentrations of inflammatory mediators related to
development and severity of multiorgan dysfunction in organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg
acute pancreatitis. The presence of SIRS as the clinical 1996; 83: 349–353.
manifestation of this inflammatory response can provide 16 Leser HG, Gross V, Scheibenbogen C, Heinisch A, Salm R,
a bedside indicator of the severity of acute pancreatitis Lausen M et al. Elevation of serum interleukin-6
during the first 48 h of presentation. concentration precedes acute phase response and reflects
severity in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1991; 101:
782–785.
References
17 Mayer J Rau B, Gansauge F, Beger HG. Inflammatory
1 Mayer AD, McMahon MJ, Corfield AP, Cooper MJ, mediators in human acute pancreatitis: clinical and
Williamson RC, Dickson AP et al. Controlled clinical trial of pathophysiological implications. Gut 2000; 47:
peritoneal lavage for the treatment of severe acute 546–552.
pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 399–404. 18 Wilson C, Heads A, Shenkin A, Imrie CW. C-reactive
2 Triester SL, Kowdley KV. Prognostic factors in acute protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective
pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 34: 167–176. markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1989; 76:
3 Abu-Zidan FM, Bonham MJ, Windsor JA. Severity of acute 177–181.
pancreatitis: a multivariate analysis of oxidative stress markers 19 Johnson CD, Abu-Hilal M. Persistent organ failure during
and modified Glasgow criteria. Br J Surg 2000; 87: the first week as a marker of fatal outcome in acute
1019–1023. pancreatitis. Gut 2004; 53: 1340–1344.
4 Mitchell RM, Byrne MF, Baillie J. Pancreatitis. Lancet 2003; 20 Jacobs ML, Daggett WM, Civette JM, Vasu MA,
361: 1447–1455. Lawson DW, Warshaw AL et al. Acute pancreatitis: analysis
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
744 R. Mofidi, M. D. Duff, S. J. Wigmore, K. K. Madhavan, O. J. Garden and R. W. Parks
of factors influencing survival. Ann Surg 1977; 185: 43–51. in critically ill patients. SvO2 Collaborative Group. N Engl J
21 Rhodes A, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy: an Med 1995; 333: 1025–1032.
evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 2004; 32(Suppl): 23 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A,
S448–S450. Knoblich B et al. Early goal-directed therapy in treatment of
22 Gattinoni L, Brazzi L, Pelosi P, Latini R, Tognoni G, severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:
Pesenti A et al. A trial of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy 1368–1377.
If you wish to comment on this, or any other article published in the BJS, please
visit the on-line correspondence section of the website (www.bjs.co.uk). Electronic
communications will be reviewed by the Correspondence Editor and a selection
will appear in the correspondence section of the Journal. Time taken to produce
a thoughtful and well written letter will improve the chances of publication in the
Journal.
Copyright 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd www.bjs.co.uk British Journal of Surgery 2006; 93: 738–744
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd