Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

4/6/2019 Opinion | The Smearing of Woody Allen - The New York Times

The Smearing of Woody Allen

By Bret Stephens

Feb. 9, 2018

Soon after Rolling Stone published a sensational — and, as it turned out, false — account of a gang
rape at a University of Virginia fraternity, Richard Bradley, the editor of Worth magazine,
suspected that something was amiss.

Basic journalistic rules, such as seeking comment from the alleged perpetrators, had not been
observed, he noted on his blog. Details of the assault, one of which seemed ripped from “Silence of
the Lambs,” were lurid past the point of plausibility.

But what most stirred Bradley’s doubt was how perfectly the story played “into existing biases,”
especially the sorts of biases Rolling Stone readers might harbor about fraternity life at Southern

Since the account of the rape “felt” true, it was easy to assume it was. Since the alleged victim had
supposedly suffered grievous harm, it was awkward to challenge her version of events. Since
important people took the story on faith and sought to press it into the service of an undeniably
noble cause, the story’s moral truth overwhelmed its factual one.

All this, Bradley knew, was the surest way to fall for the biggest lies. It’s a caution that could serve
journalists and the wider public well in the case of Woody Allen’s alleged molestation, in 1992, of
his then‑7‑year‑old adoptive daughter, Dylan Farrow.

The case is news again thanks to Farrow, who in December penned an op‑ed for The Los Angeles
Times titled, “Why Has the #MeToo Revolution Spared Woody Allen?” She repeated her charges
against Allen in a tearful interview last month on CBS, and her efforts seem to have had their
intended effect: From Mira Sorvino to Natalie Portman, A‑list actors are expressing bitter regrets
for having worked with Allen. The director is officially radioactive.

This is your last article.
Start your free trial

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/opinion/smearing-of-woody-allen.html 1/3
4/6/2019 Opinion | The Smearing of Woody Allen - The New York Times

But if Farrow wants an answer to her question, it’s because we know that the charges #MeToo
has leveled against men such as Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey are almost certainly true. The
reason they have not been spared is because they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The facts,
not the allegations, prove it.

Not so with Allen and Farrow. An in‑depth, contemporaneous and independent investigation into
the allegations, conducted over several months by the Yale‑New Haven Hospital in 1992 and 1993,
noted that there were “important inconsistencies in Dylan’s statements,” and that “her
descriptions of the details surrounding the alleged events were unusual and were inconsistent.” It
concluded categorically: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr.

That investigation (most of which remains under seal) may or may not be dispositive. It has been
criticized over the years, including by a judge who ruled against Allen in his custody battle for
Dylan and her siblings.

But since the State of Connecticut declined to press charges against Allen, it is what we have to go
on. Shouldn’t the weight of available evidence, to say nothing of the presumption of innocence,
extend to the court of public opinion, too?

That is a thought lost in some of the commentary about the case. Dylan Farrow is a persuasive
interviewee who seems absolutely sincere in her belief that she was molested by Allen as a child.
Allen, by contrast, comes across as a grouchy neurotic who, in his late 50s, had a distasteful affair
with Mia Farrow’s adopted, barely adult daughter, Soon‑Yi Previn. In the contest of sympathies,
it’s not hard to guess who wins.

But it’s precisely because Dylan’s account plays to our existing biases that we need to treat it with
added skepticism. Most parents know that young children are imaginative and suggestible and
innocently prone to making things up. The misuse of children’s memories by ambitious
prosecutors against day‑care center operators in the 1980s led to some of the worst miscarriages
of justice in recent U.S. history. You don’t have to doubt Farrow’s honesty to doubt her version of

Nor have we learned anything else about Allen in the intervening years that might add to
suspicions of guilt. He married Soon‑Yi and has been with her ever since. Nobody else has come
forward in 25 years with a fresh accusation of assault against him.

If Allen is in fact a pedophile, he appears to have acted on his evil fantasies exactly once. Compare
that to Larry Nassar’s 265 identified victims.

It goes without saying that child molestation is a uniquely evil crime that merits the stiffest
penalties. But accusing someone of being a molester without abundant evidence is also odious,
particularly in an era in which social‑media whispers can become the ruin of careers and even of

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/opinion/smearing-of-woody-allen.html 2/3
4/6/2019 Opinion | The Smearing of Woody Allen - The New York Times

That’s something for all of us to think about, even when it comes to wealthy, peculiar old men for
whom we feel no love. We still live in a country that paints a bright line between accusation and
fact. Smear the accused, smudge the line, and the truth will never out. ☐

Correction: Feb. 10, 2018

An earlier version of this column misidentified a Yale‑New Haven Hospital investigation as the only
contemporaneous and independent investigation into Dylan Farrow’s allegations against Woody
Allen. The New York State Department of Social Services and the Connecticut State Police also
investigated the allegations.

I invite you to follow me on Facebook.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today

A version of this article appears in print on Feb. 9, 2018, on Page A19 of the New York edition with the headline: Smearing Woody Allen


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/opinion/smearing-of-woody-allen.html 3/3