Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Education/Misamis Oriental
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Formulated 1 or more
intervention programs based
2
from the SWOT attached
Formulated no intervention
1 programs based from the SWOT
attached
● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school
School-based In-Service based trainings/LAC Sessions
Training/LAC Sessions 5 within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and
pictures
KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based
HUMAN trainings/LAC Sessions within a
RESOURCE 4 year supported with training
MANAGEMENT matrix,attendance and pictures
AND
DEVELOPMENT
Conducted 2 school based
(15%) April 2017 to trainings/LAC Sessions within a
4%
March 2018 3 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES April 2017 to
TIMELINE PER
4% QUALITY
March 2018 KRA
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders
4 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
April 2017 to Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders
2%
March 2018 3 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders
2 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
Awarded 4 and below
1 stakeholders during programs at
the end of the school year
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete
documents
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVI
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Department of
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Education/Misamis Oriental
KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the
MANAGEMENT teaching personnel approved by
AND OPERATIONS SDS within the school year.
(20%) Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with
April 2017 to
March 2018
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 3 loads with
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 6 loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
● Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more
educational programs educational programs, program
5 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 4
educational programs, program
4 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
Submitted incomplete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly
3%
March 2017
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
2 authentic liquidation reports
monthly
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
1 authentic liquidation reports bi-
monthly
April 2016 to
3%
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
March 2017
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY
100%
Ratee: Rater:
JEAN G. VELOSO
Assistant Schools Division Superin
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of Review:
Department of
Education/Misamis Oriental
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
● Supervised regularly all school 65 (and above)teachers are 65 (and above) teachers are
teaching personnel supervised and analyzed result 65 (and above) teachers were supervised in a month 1-5 days
5 of supervision supervised monthly and were before the schedule as per
given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
50-64 teachers are supervised 50-64 teachers were supervised 65 (and above) teachers are
4 and analyzed result of monthly and were given TA per supervised in a month as per
supervision signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
April 2017 to 35-49 teachers are supervised 35-49 teachers were supervised 50-64 teachers are supervised in
10%
March 2018 3 with out analysing the monthly and were given TA per a month as per approved
supervision result signed TA forms supervisory plan
20-34 teachers are supervised 20-34 teachers were supervised 30-49 teachers are supervised in
2 with out analysing supervision monthly and were given TA per a month as per approved
result signed TA forms supervisory plan
19 (and below) teachers are 19 and below teachers were 20 teachers and below are
1 supervised with out analysing supervised monthly and were supervised in a month as per
supervision result given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
● Managed Instructional System 100% of the instructional 105% and above of the Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were supervisory plans were supervisory plan and
5 implemented/achieved as implemented in a month accomplishment report before
planned the deadline
85-99% of the instructional 100% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
4 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report on the
planned deadline
70-84% of the instructional 85-99% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
April 2017 to 3 implemented/achieved as
10% accomplishment report 1 day
March 2018
planned after the deadline
55-69% of the instructional 70-84% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
2 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 2 days
planned after the deadline
85-99% of the classrooms were 10% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
4
,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures during the
opening of classes
70-84% of the classrooms were 20% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
April 2017 to ,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
5% 3
March 2018 supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 2months
after the opening of classes
55-69% of the classrooms were 30% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well ventilated Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
2 ,structured and secured as others through school-based ,structured and secured as
supported by pictures DRRM supported by pictures 3months
after the opening of classes
54% and below of the 40% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
classrooms were Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well ventilated
painted,lighted,well ventilated others through school-based ,structured and secured as
1 ,structured and secured as DRRM supported by pictures 4month
supported by pictures after the opening of classes
● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and Conducted a bi- monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
sufficiency with the assistance 5 and design proposals/ before the deadline supported by
of specialist intervention the transmital
Submitted valid and accurate Conducted a monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical plant inventory and based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
4 design proposals/ intervention on the deadline supported by the
transmital
Submitted valid,accurate but not Conducted a quarterly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
April 2017 to 3 and design proposals/ 1 day after the deadline
5% intervention supported by the transmital
March 2018
Submitted not accurate and not Conducted twice a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
2 and without proposals/ 2 days after the deadline
intervention supported by the transmital
of specialist
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Submitted physical plant Conducted once a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
inventory without based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
1 proposal/intervention 3 days after the deadline
supported by the transmital
● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more Formulated and Conducted 4 or Formulated the intervention
program to determine the 5 intervention programs based more interventions programs programs based from the SWOT
strength, weakness, from the SWOT attached based on SWOT attached. attached 1 month after
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school Formulated 3 or more Formulated and Conducted 3 Formulated the intervention
4 intervention programs based interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
from the SWOT attached SWOT attached. attached 2 months after
Formulated 2 or more Formulated and Conducted 2 Formulated the intervention
April 2017 to 3 intervention programs based interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
5%
March 2018 from the SWOT attached SWOT attached. attached 3 months after
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers Performs 3 ancillary services on
best fit to teach to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
assignments) approved class program program before deadline
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES April 2017 to
TIMELINE PER
4% QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
March 2018 KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Met PTA 4 times in a year too 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings within
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting the schedule under D.O. 25, s.
4 minutes, agreements,attendance 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 3 times in a year to 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 2 times in a year to 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 1 time in a year to 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O. 25,
1 minutes, agreements,attendance s. 2017
sheets,pictures,etc.
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
school needs address school needs based on stakeholders to address school school needs based on SWOTa
SWOT supported with program needs based on SWOT week after the approval of the
5 design,minutes/agreements, supported with program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Designed 1 program /project with Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs /projects
stakeholders to address school with stakeholders to address with stakeholders to address
needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT,
1 supported with program supported with program 3months after the approval of
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, the design, supported with
pictures,etc pictures,etc program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every end
of stakeholders stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds of the activity/project
5 within the school year fully outside from
documented MOOE/PTA/Teachers
● Formulated school policies Formulated 5 or more school Formulated school policies with
with stakeholders policies with the participation of the participation of the
5 the stakeholders fully stakeholders fully documented
documented before the start of classes
led and implemented 1 Addressed 54% and below of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational program, program identified school problems Report 3 days after the date
1 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of Review:
Department of
Education/Misamis Oriental
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, accurate Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete, accurate
and Management and ,authentic liquidation reports together with Cash advance for ,authentic liquidation reports 3
Operations Functions 5 monthly the next month with no instance days before the deadline
of unliquidated CA.
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested 100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers immediately after
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as the delivery .
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested 85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
4 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
75-84% of the requested 75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
3%
March 2017 summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of Review:
Department of
Education/Misamis Oriental
April 2016 to
3%
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
March 2017
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 4 days after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
1 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
participation of stakeholders ensured 100% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
5 internal and external and external stakeholders and external stakeholders before
stakeholders approved by SDS without revision on SIP /AIP and the deadline
supported with documents APP.
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 85-99% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
4 internal and external and external stakeholders and external stakeholders on the
stakeholders approved by SDS without revision on SIP and AIP. deadline
supported with documents And revision on APP.
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 75-84% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
April 2016 to 3 internal and external and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 1 day
4% stakeholders approved by SDS revisions on the two after the deadline
March 2017
supported with documents
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, original Submitted a doable, original
based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and ,need-based SIP/AIP /APP and
ensured 55-74% participation of ensured participation of internal ensured participation of internal
2 internal and external and external stakeholders with and external stakeholders 2
stakeholders approved by SDS revisions on the three days after the deadline
supported with documents
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Div
Date of Review:
April 2016 to
Department of 4%
March 2017
Education/Misamis Oriental
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
(enrolment,teacher,needs)
Organized 3 special classes for Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs a week after
4 complete documents ( enrolment, needs the start of the school year.
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
April 2016 to learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks
3%
March 2017 3 complete documents needs after the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes for Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with learners with special needs with with special needs a month after
2 complete documents no documents the start of the school year.
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
100%
LE
Rater:
JEAN G. VELOSO 3
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 2
1
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised and directed all school Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
KRA 1: teaching & non-teaching personnel Office on the target date.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of Report comparative NAT RESULT (Graphical Presentation of previous and present
students records results showing comparison)
HUMAN
RESOURCE
MANAGEMEN CHECKLIST
● Organized and conducted In-Service OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
T AND
DEVELOPMEN Training
T ( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
d) Narrattive Report and Pictures
● Promoted and coordinated services List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
for the holistic development of List of teachers promoted
school personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators