Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region 02
Division of Cagayan
Buguey South District
BUGUEY SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee EMILIA D. VENTURA Name of Rater: FLORDELIZA P. CORPUZ, Ph.D.
Position: MASTER TEACHER - II Position: Principal III
School/Division/District: BUGUEY SOUTH CENTRAL/BUGUEY SOUTH DISTRICT/CAGAYAN Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2017-MARCH 2018

TOBE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Key Result Weight RATING

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs Areas OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL SCORE
(KRAs) KRA RESULTS
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.
Basic I. Instructional 1.Carried regular teaching June 2017 to 15% 5-All DLL had 5-Carried out 180 5-Submitted 5 5 5 5.000 0.750
Education Competence load for the grade/subject March 2018 complete parts DLL/LP with 12 IMs DLL/LP before due
Services (35%) area with 180 DLL/LP and with adequate per subject date
used uploaded/updated updated and preparation
instructional materials to appropriate 4- Submitted
facilitate the teaching- instructional 4- Carried out 160 DLL/LP and used
learning process within the materials – 179 DLL/LP with IMs on time
school year 9-10 IMs per
4-Had four of the subject 3- Submitted
five parts with preparation DLL/LP and used
adequate updated IMs after due date
and appropriate 3- Carried out 140–
instructional 159 DLL/LP with 8- 2- Submitted
materials 9 IMs per subject DLL/LP and used
preparation IMs two days after

2.Provided/Innovated
atleast 5 appropriate and
updated instructional
materials available to
teachers and learners to
facilitate the teaching-
learning process within the
school year
3-Had three of the the due date
five parts with 2- Carried out 130
adequate updated – 139 DLL/LP with 1- Submitted
and appropriate 4-5 IMs per DLL/LP and used
instructional subject IMs three days
materials preparation after the due date
2-Had two of the 1- Carried out 110
five parts with – 119 DLL/LP with
adequate updated 3 and below IMs
and appropriate per subject
instructional preparation
materials
1-Had one of the
five parts with
adequate updated
and appropriate
instructional
materials
10% 5-Complete 5-Prepared 100% 5-Ensure 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
package of IMs of the instructional availability of
approved by materials available instructional
proper authorities to teachers and materials one week
were learners to before the
adopted/utilized by facilitate teaching- teaching-learning
other teachers to learning process by process
facilitate teaching- the end of school
learning process year 4- Ensure
availability of
4- Complete 4- Prepared 90- instructional
package of IMs 99% of the materials three
approved by instructional days before the
proper authorities materials available teaching-learning
but not to teachers and process
adopted/utilized by learners to
other teachers facilitate teaching- 3- Ensure
learning process by availability of
3- Complete the end of school instructional
package of IMs but year materials a day
not approved by before the
proper authorities 3- Prepared 80- teaching-learning
but adopted/ 89% of the process
utilized by other instructional
teachers materials available 2- Ensure
to teachers and availability of
2- Complete learners to instructional
package of IMs but facilitate teaching- materials on the
not approved by learning process by teaching-learning
proper authorities the end of school process
but utilized in the year
classroom 1-Inavailability of
2- Prepared 70- IMs
1- No materials 79% of the
provided innovated instructional
materials available
to teachers and
learners to
facilitate teaching-
learning process by
the end of school
year

1- Prepared 69%
and below of the
instructional
materials available
to teachers and
 learners to
facilitate teaching-
learning process by
the end of school
year
3.Led, interpreted, 10% 5-Test results were 5-Interpreted, 5-Done one week 3 4 4 3.667 0.367
analyzed and utilized test interpreted, analyzed and after the conduct
results in every rating analyzed and utilized 100% of of the test
period for the utilized with the test results in
improvement of instruction complete every rating period 4- Done two weeks
documentation for after the conduct
the improvement 4- Interpreted, of the test
of instruction analyzed and
utilized 90-99% of 3- Done three
4- Test results were the test results in weeks after the
interpreted, every rating period conduct of the test
analyzed and
utilized but 3- Interpreted, 2- Done one month
incomplete analyzed and after the conduct
documentation for utilized 80-89% of of the test
the improvement the test results in
of instruction every rating period 1-Not done

3- Test results was 2- Interpreted,

interpreted, analyzed and
analyzed but not utilized 70-79% of
utilized for the the test results in
improvement of every rating period
instruction
1- Interpreted,
2- Test results was analyzed and
interpreted, but utilized 69% and
not analyzed, below of the test
utilized for the results in every
 improvement of rating period
instruction

1-Test results was

filed but not
interpreted,
analyzed and
utilized for the
improvement of
instruction
SUB-TOTAL 35% 1.617
II.Instructional 1.Mentored/ 5% 5-5 Achievement 5- Mentored/ 5-Teachers were 4 5 5 4.667 0.233
Supervision Guided least practices were Guided at least 5 mentored/ guided
(20%) 5 teachers in recognized and teachers in the in the performance
the relevant performance of of their duties and
performance interventions/TA their duties and responsibilities
of their duties for the responsibilities within a year
and responsi- improvement of through
bilities using observed shepherding tools 4- Teachers were
shepherding development to facilitate and mentored/ guided
tools to needs were improve the in the performance
facilitate and collaboratively teaching of their duties and
improve their identified based competence within responsibilities
teaching from evidences of a year within a year
competence specific, timely,
within a year and balanced 4- Mentored/ 3- Teachers were
feedback of results Guided at least 4 mentored/ guided
of supervision teachers in the in the performance
performance of of their duties and
4-4 Achievement their duties and responsibilities
practices were responsibilities within a year
recognized and through
relevant shepherding tools 2- Teachers were
interventions/TA to facilitate and mentored/ guided
for the improve the in the performance
improvement of teaching of their duties and
observed competence within responsibilities
development a year within a year
needs were
collaboratively 3- Mentored/ 1- Teachers were
identified based Guided at least 3 mentored/ guided
from evidences of teachers in the in the performance
specific, timely, performance of of their duties and
and balanced their duties and responsibilities
feedback of results responsibilities within a year
of supervision through
shepherding tools
3-3Achievement to facilitate and
practices were improve the
recognized and teaching
relevant competence within
interventions/TA a year
for the
improvement of 2- Mentored/
observed Guided at least 2
development teachers in the
needs were performance of
collaboratively their duties and
identified based responsibilities
from evidences of through
specific, timely, shepherding tools
and balanced to facilitate and
feedback of results improve the
of supervision teaching
competence within
2-2Achievement a year
practices were
recognized and
 relevant 1- Mentored/
interventions/TA Guided at least 1
for the teacher in the
improvement of performance of
observed her/his duties and
development responsibilities
needs were through
collaboratively shepherding tools
identified based to facilitate and
from evidences of improve the
specific, timely, teaching
and balanced competence within
feedback of results a year
of supervision
1-Achievement
practices were
recognized and
relevant
interventions/TA
for the
improvement of
observed
development
needs were
collaboratively
identified based
from evidences of
specific, timely,
and balanced
feedback of results
of supervision
2.Led in the preparation 5% 5-Initiated and 5-Initiated and 5-Done before the 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
and enrichment of implemented a full implemented full rating period
curriculum of professional blown project or blown project or
ideas/problems, issues and
concerns to achieve quality
teaching within a year
program that will program were used 4- Done during the
enhance the and utilized by rating period
quality teaching- 100% of the
learning process targeted clientele 3- Done a week
through LAC after the rating
session/District 4- Initiated and period
level/Division for implemented full
Sec/INSET/PLCT blown project or 2- Done two weeks
program were used after the rating
4- Initiated and and utilized by 90- period
implemented a full 99% of the
blown project or targeted clientele 1-- Done a month
program that will after the rating
enhance the 3- Initiated and period
quality teaching- implemented full
learning process blown project or
through LAC program were used
session/School and utilized by 80-
level/Cluster 89% of the
Schools/District for targeted clientele
Sec.
2- Initiated and
3- Initiated and implemented full
implemented a full blown project or
blown project or program were used
program that will and utilized by 70-
enhance the 7% of the targeted
quality teaching- clientele
learning process
through LAC 1- Initiated and
session (Grade implemented full
level/School level) blown project or
program were used
2- Initiated and and utilized by 69%
 implemented a full and below of the
blown project or targeted clientele
program that will
enhance the
quality teaching-
learning process
through LAC
session (Grade
level/learning area)

1- Initiated a
program but no
opportunity to
share with others
3.Conducted 5 10% 5-Conducted 5-Improved 100% 5-Conducted 5 5 5 5 5 0.500
development opportunity development of the performance remedial episode
episode classes for slow opportunity of slow learners classes within the
learners to improve their episode classes due to the rating period
performance level within with complete conducted 5 DOEC
the rating period tools/ materials 4-Done during the
and analyzed 4- Improved 90- rating period
communicated 99% of the
results performance of 3-Done a week
slow learners due after the rating
4- Conducted to the conducted 5 period
development DOEC
opportunity 2-Done two weeks
episode classes 3- Improved 80- after the rating
with complete 89% of the period
tools/ materials performance of
and analyzed slow learners due 1-Done a month
results to the conducted 5 after the rating
DOEC period
3- Conducted
 development 2- Improved 70-
opportunity 79% of the
episode classes performance of
with complete slow learners due
tools/ materials to the conducted 5
and analyzed with DOEC
results
1- Improved 69%
2- Conducted and below of the
development performance of
opportunity slow learners due
episode classes to the conducted 5
with complete DOEC
tools/ materials
and analyzed with
results

1-No development
opportunity
episode classes
SUB-TOTAL 20% 0.983
III.Special 1.Updated parents on 10% 5-Updated parents 5-Parents 5-Conducted PTA 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
Task/ children’s progress and on children’s supported 100% of conferences/
Asssigned Task concerns through open progress and the DepEd goals meetings 5 times
(30%) communication in support concerns through and programs within the school
DepEd goals within the open communi- year
early rating period cation showing 4- Parents
complete supported 90-99% 4- Conducted PTA
evidences of the DepEd goals conferences/
(minutes, and programs meetings 4 times
attendance, within the school
projects, programs 3- Parents year
and accomplish- supported 80-89%
ment reports of the DepEd goals 3- Conducted PTA
 and programs conferences/
4- Updated parents meetings 3 times
on children’s 2- Parents within the school
progress and supported 70-79% year
concerns through of the DepEd goals
open communi- and programs 2- Conducted PTA
cation showing conferences/
complete 1- Parents meetings 2 times
evidences supported 69% of within the school
(minutes, the DepEd goals year
attendance, and programs
projects and 1- Conducted PTA
proposals) conferences/
meetings 1 time
3- Updated parents within the school
on children’s year
progress and
concerns through
open communi-
cation showing
complete
evidences
(minutes, and
attendance)

2- Updated parents
on children’s
progress and
concerns through
open communi-
cation showing
complete
evidences
(minutes)

2.Assisted principal/school
head in instructional/class
monitoring of 5 teachers
within the rating period
using shepherding tools to
enhance teaching-learning
process
1- Updated parents
on children’s
progress and
concerns through
open communi-
cation with no
evidence
10% 5-Assisted 5-Monitored 5 of 5-Mentored 5 5 5 5 5.000 0.500
principal/school the teachers using teachers using the
head in the shepherding shepherding tools
instruction/class tools to improve within the rating
monitoring of teaching-learning period
teachers with process
complete 4- Mentored 4
utilization and 4- Monitored 4 of teachers using the
implementation of the teachers using shepherding tools
agreement based the shepherding within the rating
from the tools to improve period
shepherding tools teaching-learning
process 3- Mentored 3
4- Assisted teachers using the
principal/school 3- Monitored 3 of shepherding tools
head in the teachers using within the rating
instruction/class the shepherding period
monitoring of tools to improve
teachers with teaching-learning 2- Mentored 2
partial utilization process teachers using the
and shepherding tools
implementation of 2 Monitored 2 of within the rating
agreement based the teachers using period
from the the shepherding
shepherding tools tools to improve 1- Mentored 1
teaching-learning teacher using the
 3- Assisted process shepherding tools
principal/school within the rating
head in 1- Monitored 1 period
instruction/class teacher using the
monitoring of shepherding tools
teachers with to improve
complete/partial teaching-learning
utilization but no process
implementation of
agreement based
from the
shepherding tools

2- Assisted
principal/school
head in
instruction/class
monitoring of
teachers with no
evidences

1- Assisted
principal/school
head in
instruction/class
monitoring of
teachers with no
assistance given
3. Conducted basic on 10% 5-Basic education 5-Completion 1 1 1 1.000 0.100
education research to research with conducted within
enhance learners’ policy the Completion
development and recommendation conducted one
achievement week after the
4- Basic education required time
 research with
complete 4-Completion
recommendation conducted one
week after the
3- Basic education required time
research with on
going results 3-Completion
conducted two
2-Basic education weeks the required
research with time
conceptualized and
approved by 2-Completion
proper authorities conducted three
weeks after the
1-Basic education required time
research with
conceptualized and 1-Completion
approved by conducted one
proper authorities month after the
required time
SUB-TOTAL 30% 1.100
IV.Professional 1.Attended professional 5% 5-Attended and 5-Attended 100% 5-Disseminated 2 2 2 2.000 0.100
Growth (10%) growth development cascaded learning seminars, immediately the
meetings, in-service from professional workshops, lesson learned in
trainings and related growth trainings and the seminars,
activities for self growth development cascaded to workshops,
and advancement for co- learnings with teachers with attended right
teachers complete proper after the seminar
evidences documentation
(trainings designs, 4- Disseminated
technical report 4- Attended 90- the lesson learned
monitoring and 99% seminars, in the seminars,
evaluation) workshops, workshops,
trainings and attended a week
 4- Attended and cascaded to after the seminar
cascaded learning teachers with
from professional proper 3- Disseminated
growth documentation immediately the
development lesson learned in
learnings with 3- Attended 80- the seminars,
evidences (without 89% seminars, workshops,
monitoring and workshops, attended two
evaluation) trainings and weeks after the
cascaded to seminar
3- Attended and teachers with
cascaded learning proper 2- Disseminated
from professional documentation immediately the
growth lesson learned in
development 2- Attended 70- the seminars,
learnings with 79% seminars, workshops,
evidences (without workshops, attended three
terminal report and trainings and weeks after the
monitoring report) cascaded to seminar
teachers with
2- Attended and proper 1-- Disseminated
cascaded learning documentation immediately the
from professional lesson learned in
growth 1- Attended 69% the seminars,
development and below workshops,
learnings and seminars, attended a month
evidence (training workshops, after the seminar
design) trainings and
cascaded to
1-Conducted but teachers with
no documents proper
documentation
2.Served as 5% 5-Served as 5-100% of the 5-100% of the 2 2 3 2.333 0.117
trainer/facilitator/evaluato trainer/demonstrat targeted activities targeted activities
 r/resource speaker and
demonstration teacher
during INSET/Division
seminars to share effective
technique and strategies in
classroom instruction
SUB-TOTAL
V.Plus Factor Attained the following
(15%) a-Published an article in
national circulation
b-Achieved zero drop-out
rate
c-Served as chairman/co-
ion teacher during were attained were attained
the district INSET before the rating
4-90-99% of the period
4- Served as targeted activities
trainer/demonstrat were attained 4-90-99% of the
ion teacher during targeted activities
the cluster INSET 3-80-89% of the were attained
targeted activities before the rating
3- Served as were attained period
trainer/demonstrat
ion teacher during 2-70-79% of the 3-80-89% of the
the school INSET targeted activities targeted activities
were attained were attained
2- Served as before the rating
trainer/demonstrat 1-69% and below period
ion teacher during of the targeted
the LAC session activities were 2-70-79% of the
attained targeted activities
1-Did not served as were attained
trainor/demonstrat before the rating
ion period
teacher/speaker
1-69% and below
of the targeted
activities were
attained before the
rating period
10% 0.217
15% 5-Attained 7 5-100% of the 5-100% of the 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
indicators with targeted were targeted activities
documents attained were met within
the school year
4- Attained 6 4-90-99% of the
indicators with targeted were 4-90-99% of the
 chairman in any working documents attained targeted activities
committee in the were met within
school/division/region 3- Attained 5 3-80-89% of the the school year
d-Received award or indicators with targeted were
recognition as exemplary documents attained 3-80-89% of the
teacher both personal and targeted activities
professional 2- Attained 4 2-70-79% of the were met within
e-served as indicators with targeted were the school year
TWG/coordinator in the documents attained
barangay 2-70-79% of the
f-Served as OIC 1- Attained 3 1-69% and below targeted activities
g-Other winnings (Head indicators with of the targeted were met within
Coach winner, Outstanding documents were attained the school year
Teacher)
1-69% and below
of the targeted
activities were met
within the school
year
SUB-TOTAL
OVERALL RATING FOR VERY 4.127
ACCOMPLISHMENT SATISFACTORY

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

FLORDELIZA P. CORPUZ, Ph.D. EMILIA D. VENTURA BENITO ALIPIO, JR., Ph.D.

Principal III Master Teacher II Assistant Schools Division Superintendent