Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

1|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

LEGAL ETHICS ASSIGNMENT 3 – ASSIGNMENT 12 11. Camacho v. Pangulayan, A.C. No. 4807, March 22, 2000

Assignment No. 2 12. TekBeng v. David, A.C. No. 1261, December 29, 1983

Additional

AM no. 15-06-10-sc Assignment 4

Assignment No. 3 Canons 10-13

1. Bar matter 1625 October 13, 2015 1. Young v. Batuegas, 403 SCRa 123

Lawyer’s duties to the legal profession 2. Chavez v. Viola A.C. No. 2152. April 19, 1991

Canons 7-9 3. RE: Suspension of Atty. Rogelio Z. Bagabuyo, Former State


Proseuctor, 535 SCRA 200
1. Ulep v. Legal Clinic
4. Montecillo v. Gica, 60 SCRA 234
2. Bar Matter 553, 223 SCRA 378
5. Foodsphere v. Mauricio, 593 SCRA 367
3. Rivera v. Angeles A.C. 2519 339 SCRA 149

4. Ducat v. Villalon A.C. No. 3910 337 SCRA 622


Assignment No. 5
5. In Re: Salazar, 92 SCRA 1
Attorney Client relationship
6. Tan V. Sabandal B.M. No. 44, February 10, 1989
1. Uy V. Gonzales 426 SCRA 422
7. Pangan v. Ramos, A.M. No. 1053, Aug 31, 1981
2. Rilloraza v. Eastern Telecommunications, 309 SCRA 566
8. In RE: Gutierrez, A.M. No. L-363, July 31, 1962
3. Orbit Transport v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, G.R.
9. Narido v. Linsangan, A.M. No. 944, July 25, 1974
No. L-38768, july 23, 1974
10. Laput v. Remotigue, A.M. No. 219, September 29, 1962
4. Regala v. Sandiganbayan G.R. No. 105938, September 20, 1996
2|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

Assignment No. 6 Assignment No. 8

Canons 14-15 1. Judicial Ethics A.M. No. 03-05-01-SC

1. Santiago v. Fojas, 245 SCRA 68 Canon 1

2. Cantiller v. Potenciano 180 SCRA 246 2. Lazo v. Judge Tiong, A.M. No. MTJ-98-1173, December 15, 1998

3. Millare v. Montero 246 SCRA 1 3. Libarios v. Judge Dabalos, A.M. No. RTJ-89-266 July 11, 1991

4. Abragan v. Rodriguez 380 SCRA 93 4. Sabitsana v. Judge Villamor, A.M. No. 90-474 October 4, 1991

5. Aninon v. SAbitsana 669 SCRA76 5. Mayor Padilla v. Zantua, A.M. MTJ-93-888, October 24, 1994

6. Tan v. Judge Rosete, A.M. No. MTJ-04-1563, September 8, 2004

Assignment no. 7 7. Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge De Guzman, A.M.


RTJ-93-1021, January 31, 1997
Canons 16- 22
8. Spelmans v. JudgeOcampo, A.M. No. MTJ-07-1663, March 26,
1. Aquino v. CA G.R. No. 109493 1999
2010
2. Angeles v. Uy, 330 SCRA 6
9. Munez v. Judge Arino, A.M. No. MTJn94-985 February 21, 1995
3. Nakpil v. Valdez 186 SCRA 758
10. Concerned Boholanos for Law and Order v. Judge Calibo, A.M.
4. Pentecostes v. Ibanez 304 SCRA 281 No. RTJ 01-1621, September 27, 2007

11. Judge Inoturan v. Judge Limsiaco, A.M. No. MTJ-011362,


February 22, 2011
3|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

Assignment No. 9 11. SPS.Causin v. Judge Demecillo, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1860


September 8, 2004
Canon 2
12. Seludo v. Judge Fineza, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1864, December 16,
1, Gacad v. Judge Clapis, A.M. No. RTJ-10-2257, July 27, 2012
2004
2. Zacarias v. Judge Marcos, A.M. No. MTJ 04-1520, January 27,
2004
Assignment No. 10
3. Rural Bank of Baratoc v. Cataguena, A.M. NO. 707-MJ, July 21,
1978 Canon 3

4. Tobias v. Judge Limsiaco, A.M. 09-1734, January 19, 2011, 1. Tabora v. Judge Carbonell, RTJ-08-2145, June 18, 2010
January 19, 2011
2. RE: Inhibition of Judge Rojas, A.M. 98-6-185-RTC, October 30,
5. Fernandez v. Judge Hamoy, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1821, august 12, 1998
2004
2. Fecundo v. Judge Berjamen, G.R. No. 88105, December 18, 1989
6. Re: Suspension of Clerk of Court, Rogelio Jacobo, A.M. No. 93-
3. Hilado v. Judge Reyes, G.R. No. 163155, July 21, 2006
10-1296, August 12, 1998
4. Sps. Nazareno v. Judge Almario, A.M. No. RTJ-94-1195,
7. Chan v. Judge Madajucon, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1697, October 15,
February 26, 1997
2003
5. SPS.Marfil and ESpaniola v. Judge Cuachon, A.M. No. 2360-MJ,
8. Dawa v. Judge De Asa, A.M. No. MTJ-98-1144, July 22, 1998
August 31, 1981
9. Anonymous v. Judge Achas, AM. No. MTJ-11-1801, February 27,
6. OCA v. Judge IsmaelRTJ-07-2045, January 19, 2010
2013
7. Borromeo-Garcia v. Judge Pagayatan, AM No. 08-2127,
10. InRE: Report in the Judcial Audit conducted in the RTC,
September 25, 2008
Urdaneta City, Pangasinan, A.M. No. 08-4-253, Janujary 12, 2011
8. SY, V. DINOPOL, A.M. NO. RTJ-09-2189, JANUARY 18, 2011
4|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

9. ANDRES V. JUDGE MADAJUCON, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1762, 9. REYES V. JUDGE DUQUE, AM NO. RTJ-08-2136, SEPTEMBER 21,
DECEMBER 17, 2008 2010

10. CATBAGA V. BARTE, A.M. NO. MTJ 02-1452, APRIL 6, 2005 10. PERFECTO V. JUDGE DEALES-ESIDERA, AM. NO. RTJ-11-2270,
642 SCRA 1
11. ORTIZ V. JACULBE, AM NO. RTJ 04-1833, JUNE 28, 2005
11. KING V. JUDE HONTANOSAS, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1802,
SEPTEMBER 21,2004
Assignment No. 11
12. CO V. JUDGE PLATA, A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1501, MARCH 14, 2005
CANON 4

1. BERNACILLO V. JUDGE AMILA, A.M. NO. RTJ 08-2149, MARCH


Assignment No. 12
9, 2011
CANON 5
2. MARCOS V. JUDGE PAMINTUAN A.M. NO. RTJ 07-2062,
JANUARY 18, 2011 1. UY V. JAVELLANA, A.M. NO. MTJ-07-1666, SEPTEMBER 5, 2012

3. BALAYON V. JUDGE OCAMPO, A.M. NO. MTJ 91-619, JANUARY 2. SPS. ANDRES V MADAJUCON, A.M. NO. RTJ-03-1762,
29, 1993 DECEMBER 17, 2008

4. HAW TAY V. JUDGE SINGAYAO, A.M. NO. R-592-RTJ, 3. SANTOS V. TANCIONGCO, A.M. NO. MTJ-06-1631, SEPTEMBER
SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 30, 2008

5. LIWANAG V. JUDGE LUSTRE, A.M. NO. MTJ-98-1168, APRIL 21, 4. RODRIGUEZ V. ONG, A.M. NO. 08-19-SB-J, AUGUST 24, 2010
1999
5. MATAGA V. ROSETE, A.M. NO. MTJ-03-1488, OCTOBER 13,
6. IN RE: JUDGE ACUNA, A.M. NO. RTJ-04-1891, JULY 28, 2005 2004

7. HEIRS OF THE LATE ASPIRAS V. JUDGE GANAY, A.M. NO. RTJ- 6. CONCERNED TRIAL LAWYERS OF MANILA V. VENERACIO, A.M.
07-25055, DECEMBER 17, 2009 NO. RTJ-05-12920, APRIL 26, 2006

8. BELEN V. JUDGE BELEN, 671 SCRA 477 6. JULIO V. VEGA, A.M. NO. RTJ-89-406, JULY 18, 1991
5|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

7. SALAZAR V. MARIGOMEN, A.M. NO RTJ-06-2004 OCTOBER 19,


2007

8. CORREA V. BELEN, A.M. NO. RTJ-10-2242, AUGUST 6, 2010

9. OCENAR V. MABUTIN, A.M. NO. MTJ 05-1582, FEBRUARY 28,


2005

10. STATE PROSECUTORS V. MURO, A.M. NO. RTJ 92-876,


DECEMBER 11, 1995

Assignment No. 13

CANON 6

1. ENRIQUEZ V. CAMINADE, A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1966, MARCH 21,


2006

2. DE LA CRUZ V. CARRETAS, A.M. NO. RTJ-07-2043, SEPTEMBER


5, 2007

3. SABATIN V. MALLARE, MTJ-04-1537, MARCH 25, 2004

4. IMPAO V. MAKILALA, A.M. NO. MTJ-88-184, OCTOBER 13, 1


6|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

Legal Ethics Update Part 2: 13. Failure of Attorney to disclose pertinent fact to client
constitutes appearance of conflicting interest, 490 SCRA518
For individual report and reaction paper.
14. Attorney and Client 39 SCRA 136
1. Integration of the Philippine Bar 48 SCRA 593
15. The role of an attorney in a compromise agreement 52 SCRA
2. The use of Abusive language is not a ground for
232
disqualification from membership in the bar 94 SCRA 522
16. Privileged communication in judicial proceedings 1SCRA 81
3. Fundamentals of law practice in more than one jurisdiction 136
SCRA 352 17. The duty of practitioners in handling cases, 124 SCRA

4. Lawyers are not angels 83 SCRA 742 18. Criticism of courts-proper language to be used 70 SCRA 389

5. Attorney in Court Practice 53 SCRA 197 19. The lawyers must always uphold their oath and the legal
profession 125 SCRA 279
6. Memorandum of Authorities on the Constitutionality of Bar
Integration 48 SCRA 565 20. The concept of privileged communications 11 SCRA 667

7. Disbarment proceedings 141 SCRA 51 21. Compensation for legal services 94 SCRA 794

8. Decorum of a legal practitioner 93 SCRa 103 22. The rule on substitution or employment of additional counsel
51 SCRA 22
9. Direct Contempt; a means of Judicial Tyranny 474 SCRa 392
23. The ethical conduct of lawyer 241 SCRA 128
10. Judicial disposition of Tardiness in Court Hearings 120 SCRA
52 24. Clash of societal rights 137 SCRA 660

11. Legal Consequences of the Lawyer’s Professional Mistakes, 25. Misconduct and negligence of public officers 282 SCRA 592
carelessness and negligence, 51 SCRA 429
26. Lawyers are not expected to know all the law 98 SCRA 49
12. Attorney and client privileged communication, 262 SCRA 194
27. The lawyer and the judge 99 SCRA 127
7|LEGAL ETHICS LIST OF CASES

28. The meaning of grave abuse of discretion 111 SCRA 622

29. Judicial decorum 99 SCRA 149

30. The Ten Commandments of the Judiciary, 130 SCRA 21

31. Scope of Constitutional Independence of Judges 240 SCRA


163