(/)

 X

We use Free
HOME cookies to give
Essays Case you the
Study: BPIbest
vs. deexperience
Coster possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with HIRE WRITER

our cookie policy (https://studymoose.com/privacy-policy)

PLAGIARISM CHECKER

Case Study: BPI vs. de Coster Essay ESSAY TOPICS

FLASHCARDS
A+
Pages:
4
Words:
890
FACTS:On Dec. 29, 1921, Gabriela Andrea de Coster y Roxas and her
husband acting as her agent, made to the BPI a certain promissory noteBLOGfor
P292,000,payable one year after date, with interest of 9 per cent per
ORDER NOW
annum and payable monthly. In order to secure the payment thereof, Jean
M.Poizat and J. M. Poizat and Co. executed a chattel mortgage in favor ofLog In
the plaintiff on the steamers Roger Poizat and Gabrielle Poizat including
the machinery and materials belonging to the Poizat Vegetable Oil Mills.
Gabriela Andreade Coster y Roxas and her husband acknowledged and
delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage on certain real property lying and
being situated in the City of Manila. The real property was subject to a
Subject:
prior mortgage in favor of La Orden de Dominicos or PP. Predicadores de
Cost
(https://studymoose.com/cost), la Provinciadel Santisimo Rosario, hence it is made a party defendant. The
Complaint promissory is long past due which compel the plaintiff to file an action
(https://studymoose.com/complaint)
against the defendants.

A LIMITED TIME OFFER! The lower court rendered judgment against the defendants
Get a custom sample essay GabrielaAndrea de Coster y Roxas, Jean M. Poizat and J. M. Poizat andCo.
written according to your and made them liable,jointly and severally, for the payment of P292,000,
requirements with interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum starting from the 31st of
URGENT 3H DELIVERY August, 1923. They are also order to pay P10,000 as attorney’s fees and
GUARANTEED P2,500 for the insurance upon the steamer Gabrielle Poizat , with interest
on that amount starting from February 9, 1924, at the rate of 9 per cent
ORDER NOW
per annum, and costs.
(https://essays.studymoose.com/order?
utm_source=studymoose.com&utm_medium=ch_gl&utm_campaign=sample-
Then the plaintiff files a petition to the court for a writ of execution. On
page&utm_term=side-
May 3, 1924, the plaintiff files a motion to declare the defendants in default
bar_order-
now&utm_content=order) due to their failure to appear or answer. The court rendered decision in
Haven't favor of the plaintiffs. On Aug. 26, 1924, Gabriela Andrea de Coster y Roxas,
Get your custom sample essay (https://essays.studymoose.com/order?
found the claimed that she had been residing in Paris, France from
utm_source=studymoose.com&utm_medium=ch_gl&utm_campaign=footer&utm_term=get-
for1908
only until April
essay you $13.90/page
30, 1924 and that she only found out about the case from the newspapers.
you-custom-essay-sample&utm_content=order)
want?
She further claims that she was never given any summons by the sheriff
and that her husband exceeded his authority as her agent. She prayed that
the judgment to be annulled and set aside. She also prayed that the case
be reopened and she be permitted to file an answer so that the case can
be tried according to its merits.

W
e
w
ill
w
ri
te
a
c
u
st
o
m
e
s
s
a
y
o
n
C
a
s
e
S
t
u
d
y:
B
P
I
v
s.
d ORDER(https://essays.studymoose.com/order?
e utm_source=studymoose.com&utm_medium=ch_gl&utm_campaign=sample-
C NOW page&utm_term=top-custom_order-now&utm_content=order)
o
s
t
e
r
s
p
e
ci
fi
c
al
 ly
f
o
r
y
o
u
fo
r
o
nl
y
$1
6.
38
$1
3.
90
/p
a
g
e

ISSUES:

• Whether or not proper summons were served.

• Whether or not Jean M. Poizat, husband of the defendant exceeded his

authority as an agent of his wife.

• Whether or not the case should be remanded to the lower court.

HELD:With regards to the first issue, the Court held that the summons has
not been properly served. In the ordinary course of things when the wife is
absent from the residence of husband by reason of pleasure or business,
the residence of the wife would continue and remain to be that of the
husband. In the instant case, the circumstances warrant otherwise. For
fifteen years the residence of the husband was in the City of Manila, and
the residence of the wife was in the City of Paris prior to the filing of the
complaint and issuance of summons.. There have been no personal service
of summon on the defendant as required by the Rules of Court because
the publication requirement for serving of summons to persons made
party to a case who are residing abroad has not been satisfied.

With regards to the second issue, the Court held that Jean M. Poizat has
exceeded his authority as the agent of his wife. It will be noted that there is
no provision in power of attorney granted to the husband of the defendant
which authorizes or empowers him to sign anything or to do anything
which would make his wife liable as a surety for a pre-existing debt. It is
fundamental rule of construction that in an instrument where powers and
duties are specified and defined, all of such powers and duties are limited
and confined to those expressly mentioned therein and all other powers
and duties are excluded. It is very apparent from the face of the
instrument that the purpose of the power of attorney was to empower and
authorize the husband to look after and protect the interests of his wife.
But nowhere does it provide or authorize him to make her liable as a
surety for the payment of the pre-existing debt of a third person.

Hence, it follows that the husband was not authorized or empowered to

sign the note in question for and on behalf of his wife. Therefore, the note
is void for want of power of the husband to execute it. The same thing is
true as to the real mortgage to the bank.It was given to secure the note in
question and was not given for any other purpose. The real property
described in the mortgage was the property of the wife. The note being
void as far the wife is concern, it follows that the real mortgage to the bank
is also void for want of power to execute it.

On the last issue, the Court held that the case should be remanded to the
lower court to give the wife opportunity to file an answer to plaintiff’s
cause of action so that the case can be tried according to its merits.

How to cite this page

Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Chicago ASA IEEE AMA

Case Study: BPI vs. de Coster. (2016, Dec 08). Retrieved from
https://studymoose.com/case-study-bpi-vs-de-coster-essay
(https://studymoose.com/case-study-bpi-vs-de-coster-essay)
 We will write
a custom
sample essay
on
Case
Study:
ORDER NOW (HTTPS://ESSAYS.STUDYMOOSE.COM/ORDER?
BPI vs. de UTM_SOURCE=STUDYMOOSE.COM&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_GL&UTM_CAMPAIGN=SAMPLE-
Coster PAGE&UTM_TERM=BOTTOMCUSTOM&UTM_CONTENT=ORDER)

specifically for
you
for only
$16.38
$13.90
$13.90/page

Search Search

Related Essays

Is College Worth The Cost (https://studymoos…
Marriott Cost of Capital (https://studymoose.c…
Challenges Associated with High Fixed Costs –…
Quantitative Analysis Assignment (https://stu…
Addendum to the Risk Assessment Matrix (htt…
Quality Costs for Consideration (https://study…
Glaser Health Products (https://studymoose.c…
Cafes monte bianco case analysis (https://stu…
Economics 247 Assignment 2 Version A (https…
Costa Coffee (https://studymoose.com/costa-…

(/)
© 2014 - 2019
StudyMoose.com
FOLLOW US COMPANY LEGAL PAYMENT

About StudyMoose (/about) Terms & Conditions

Contact (/contact) (https://essays.studymoose.com/terms)
(https://www.facebook.com/StudyMoosecom/)
(https://twitter.com/studymoosecom)
Careers (/careers) Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy)
Help Center (/faq) Complaints (/copyright-form)
Donate a Paper (/essay-
upload)

info@studymoose.com THIS SERVICE WILL BE USEFUL FOR:

(mailto:info@studymoose.com)
(415) 230-5300 (tel:(415) 230- At Studymoose.com you will find a wide variety of top-notch essay and term
5300) paper samples on any possible topics absolutely for free. Want to add some
juice to your work? No problem! Here you will also find the best quotations,
synonyms and word definitions to make your research paper well-formatted
and your essay highly evaluated.