20CD PDF

Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 03-Jan-19
Sr.No. CaseNo/Branch Title Subject Judgement Date Judgement Received Date Compliance Date Compliance By Remarks
1 LPA 1014/15 in Manju Rani Reg.Consider for the For the reasons afore-stated, the appeal is
09-03-2017 22-05-2017 21-09-2017 Directorate Communication made to
CWP v/s post of PGT Biology allowed; the order passed by learned Single to HSSC vide
No.25889/12 State & Ors.
Judge is set aside and the appellant's writ No.4/365-12 Co(1)
Coordination
petition is dt.13.12.16
accepted with a direction to the authorities
to treat her eligible for the post of PGT
Biology. In case the appellant, on the basis
of her performance in the
interview and overall selection criteria has
made to the selection list, she shall be
offered appointment within a period of two
months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order. The appellant in that
eventuality shall be entitled to notional
seniority from the date candidate lower in
merit was
offered appointment. However, she shall
not be paid any arrears of pay.
(10) Ordered accordingly
2 CWP 10152/18 Chanderpal & Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
26-04-2018 19-06-2018 18-10-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. benefit of Selection merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s Grade
disposed of with a direction to respondent
State & Ors.
No.2 to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioners in
the legal notice dated 06.03.2018 (P-7)
and to decide the same in accordance with
law, rules and regulations as well as
instructions issued by the Government from
time to time and also in view of judgment
referred in para 2 of this order, within a
period of four months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order.
However, in case the petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any of the order passed by the
afore-said authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse
to other remedies available to him under
law including to approach this Court
03-01-2019 Page 1 of 135

3 CWP 10155/18 Satish Kumar Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
26-04-2018 14-05-2018 13-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Sharma & Ors. benefit for revised merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s pay scale
State & Ors.
No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
by the petitioners in the legal notice dated
06.03.2018 (P-7) and to decide the same in
accordance with law, rules and regulations
as well as instructions issued by the
Government from time to time and also in
view of judgment referred in para 2 of this
order, within a period of four months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
However, in case the petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any of the order passed by the
afore-said authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse
to other remedies available to him under
law including to approach this Court
4 CWP 10238/18 Jagroop Singh Reg.Prepare and Having heard learned counsel for the
26-04-2018 22-06-2018 21-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s complete the parties, the instant petition is disposed of
State & Ors. service book and to
in terms of CWP No.2886 of 2018 titled
grant him all
consequential ‘Randhir Singh Vs.
benefits such as State of Haryana & others’ decided on
salary, annual 27.02.2018 involving the same issue.
increments
etc.alongwith
interest @ p.a from
the date it became
due
5 CWP 10278/18 Balbir Singh Reg.Selection Grade Learned counsel for the petitioner is
26-04-2018 17-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s advised to file a detailed
State & Ors.
representation/serve legal notice to the
concerned respondent(s) for getting his
grievances redressed and in case of
non-redressal of his grievance(s), he shall
be at liberty to have recourse to the
remedies available under law as well as to
approach this Court
03-01-2019 Page 2 of 135

6 CWP 10317/18 Pawan Singh Reg.Transfer In response, learned State counsel submits
26-04-2018 08-05-2018 03-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Kadian that claim/grievance of the petitioner shall
v/s
be re-examined, notwithstanding the
State & Ors.
impugned order
of his transfer. And appropriate orders, in
accordance with law, shall be passed
within a period of one week from today.
And, if the petitioner is not
already relieved, he shall not be relieved
from his original posting, till a decision, as
indicated above, is reached.
The petition is accordingly disposed of, in
the above terms. In the event, the
claim/grievance of the petitioner is
declined, the respondent authority shall
pass a comprehensive order, assigning
reasons in support thereof.
7 CWP 1040/14 Parveen Kumar Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate Deemed University
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & ors. English
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and The Hon'ble High Court
others Vs. State of Haryana and another granted stay in LPA
decided on 27.5.2015. No.1215 of 2015 against
the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
No.7626/15 titled as
State of Haryana
Vs.Gurmail Kaur
8 CWP 10476/17 Wazir Singh & Reg.Pay Fixation I find this to be a fair submission. Keeping
16-05-2017 14-06-2017 13-09-2017 Directorate
Coordination Ors. in view the plight as portrayed, I deem it
v/s
appropriate to dispose of this petition with
State & Ors.
a direction to the respondent No.2 to
decide the said legal notice of the
petitioners and pass a speaking order
thereon within a period of three months
from the date of receipt of a certified copy
of this order. Ordered
accordingly.
Since the main case has been decided, the
pending civil miscellaneous application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 3 of 135

9 CWP 10499/18 Kohar Singh & Reg.Deemed date of In view of the above, this petition is
09-05-2018 28-05-2018 27-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. regularization of disposed of with a direction to the
v/s service
competent authority amongst the
State & Ors.
respondents to take a decision on the legal
notice by passing a speaking order
declaring the rights of the petitioner for
regularization, if any, on
non-discriminatory principles and in the
light of the earlier orders passed by this
Court in relation to
similar issue in the Education Department
concerning part-time workers/sweepers.
The department would take into
consideration the orders
placed on file at Annex. P-5 and P-6. Final
decision be taken within three months
from the date of receiving a certified copy
of this order.
10 CWP 10507/18 Lalita Taneja Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
30-04-2018 15-05-2018 14-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History benefit of Stepping merits of the case, the instant petition is
Retd.) up being claimed
disposed of with the direction to
v/s with the same
State & Ors. Scheduled Caste respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner
junior teacher in the and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana,
cadre and further Education Department, Haryana Civil
by notional pay Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the
fixation and pension grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
revision and other representation dated 08.08.2017
retiral benefits (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
revision with accordance with Rules, Regulations and
interest
instructions issued by government from
time to time as well as in view of similar
order passed by respondents vide order
dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of
3 months from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved
against any of the order(s) passed by the
concerned authority, she shall be at liberty
to have
recourse to the other remedies available
under law including filing of writ petition.
03-01-2019 Page 4 of 135

11 CWP 10551/18 Ishwar Chand Reg.Stepping up and Without expressing any opinion on the
30-04-2018 24-05-2018 23-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) notional pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s fixation
State & Ors.
respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner
and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana,
Education Department, Haryana Civil
Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the
grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
representation dated 15.09.2017
(Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
accordance with Rules, Regulations and
order passed by respondents vide order
dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of
3 months from the date of receipt of
concerned authority, he shall be at liberty
to have
under law including filing of writ petition.
03-01-2019 Page 5 of 135

12 CWP 10588/17 Gurtej Singh Reg.Step up of pay In sum and substance, the claim of the
17-05-2017 08-06-2017 07-12-2017 Directorate
PGT-IV v/s petitioners in this writ petition is to apply
State & Ors.
multiplier of 1.86 to the upgraded grade
pay/pay-scale as per the formula for pay
fixation given in Clause A to Rule 7 of the
pay rules notified on 30.12.2008. In short,
the petitioners' claim is that they are
entitled to step-up their pay at par with
their juniors with the applicability of the
above-mentioned formula.
The above-stated claim has been raised by
the petitioners in their legal notice dated
25.01.2017 (P-10) also.
In this view of the matter, we dispose of
this writ petition without expressing any
views on merits, with a direction to the
authorities to
examine the claim of the petitioners as
contained in the above-mentioned legal
notice and decide the same by way of
reasoned order within a period of six
months from the date of receiving a
13 CWP 1067/14 Balbir Singh Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s for the post of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & ors. Lect.in Physical
Education
passed in CWP
Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of
Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 6 of 135

14 CWP 10747/17 Deepak & Ors. Reg.Grant Higher Consequently, without going into merits
30-08-2017 26-09-2017 25-01-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s Pay Scale what is stated in the petition, the petition is
State & Ors.
disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to take a decision on the
representation of the petitioners (Annexure
P-8), dated 12.10.2016, and to decide the
same
in terms of the judgment of this Court in
Neelam Ranis' case (supra), within a
period of 4 months from the date of receipt
of a certified copy of
this order.
If the petitioners' case is not covered by the
aforesaid judgment or any other judgment
on the subject, detailed reasons as to why it
is not
covered, shall be given in the speaking
order to be passed.
It is also clarified that in case a speaking
order has already been passed giving such
detailed reasons, then only a short order
need be passed
in the present petitioners' case, annexing
therewith the detailed order already
passed (if any).
15 CWP 10784/18 Raj Bala & Anr. Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
02-05-2018 16-05-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors.
respondents to consider and decide the
claim/grievance of the petitioners, as also
the legal notice dated 16.02.2018
(Annexure P6), within a period of 3 months
from the receipt of certified copy of this
order. And pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law.
Needless to assert, in the event the claim of
the petitioners is declined, the
respondent-authorities shall pass a
comprehensive order assigning reasons in
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 7 of 135

16 CWP 10816/18 Melo Devi Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
02-05-2018 06-06-2018 05-09-2018 Directorate
State & Ors.
claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also
Needless to assert, in the event the claim of
the petitioner is declined, the
support thereof.
17 CWP 10852/99 Anant Ram Reg.promotion as Perusal of Annexure R-1, it is evident that
11-05-2017 31-05-2017 10-08-2017 Directorate
PGT-II Singla lect. the petitioner has been denied the
v/s
monetary benefits from 1988 to 2000 on
State & Ors.
the promotion post of Lecturer in
Commerce. The concerned respondent is
hereby directed to calculate difference of
pay from 26.9.1988 to 27.6.2000 and
disburse the same within a period of three
months from today.
With the above observations, petition
stands disposed of.
18 CWP 1098/16 Yashpal Singh & Reg.Challenge the A perusal of the afore-referred preliminary
15-02-2016 04-05-2016 03-06-2016 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. transfer orders fact finding inquiry by the DEO, Rohtak
v/s
shows recommendation of disciplinary
State & Ors.
proceedings against the Principal and the
TGTs mentioned therein. It is directed that
the final decision with regard to the same
be taken by the competent Authority
expeditiously but not later than one month
of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 8 of 135

19 CWP 11214/14 Dr.Deepak Reg.Medical In view of the above discussion, this
12-07-2016 08-08-2016 Directorate LPA filed by the
HR(G-I) Kapur Reimbursement petition is partly allowed; the order/letter petitioner and same is
v/s
dated 23.10.2013 (Annexure P-6) is set fixed for hearing on
State & Ors
aside and a direction is given to the 13.12.18
respondents to completely reimburse the Sanction issued as per
medical bills pertaining to the treatment of norms
late Mrs. Ved Prabha Kapur at PGIMER,
Chandigarh as indoor and outdoor patient
as per instructions/letter dated
28.05.2003(Annexure P-11), which
provides for complete reimbursement of
indoor and outdoor treatment for chronic
disease.
20 CWP 11233/17 Harish Kumar Reg. Grant him I find this to be a fair submission. In the
22-05-2017 19-06-2017 18-09-2017 Directorate Letter written to DEO for
PGT-II v/s seniority alongwith circumstances, this petition is disposed of compliance.Reminder
State & Ors. monetary benefits
with a direction to the respondent No.3 to also issued
as due with interest
decide the
said representation by passing a speaking
order thereon within a period of three
months from the date of receipt of a
pending Civil Misc. Application, if any, also
stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 9 of 135

21 CWP 11268/18 Mangal Singh Reg.Step up & Without expressing any opinion on the
07-05-2018 21-05-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) notional pay merits of the case, the
v/s fixation
instant petition is disposed of with the
State & Ors.
direction to respondent No.1-Financial
Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of
Haryana, Education Department,
Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to
look into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioner in representation dated
15.06.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decide
the same in accordance with Rules,
Regulations and instructions issued by
government from time to time as well as in
view of similar order passed by
respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017
(P-5 and P-6), within a period of 3 months
from the date of receipt of certified copy of
this order.
to have
under law including filing of writ petition
03-01-2019 Page 10 of 135

22 CWP 11268/18 Mangal Singh Reg.Step up & Without expressing any opinion on the
07-05-2018 21-05-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) notional pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s fixation
State & Ors.
respondent No.1-Financial
Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of
Haryana, Education Department, Haryana
Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into
the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
(Annexure P-9) and to decide
the same in accordance with Rules,
Regulations and instructions issued by
government from time to time as well as in
view of similar order passed by
(P-5 and P-6), within a period of 3 months
this order.
to have
under law including filing of writ petition
23 CWP 11576/12 Jyoti Ahlawat Reg.Allow to appear Accordingly, the present writ petition is
04-11-2015 07-12-2015 06-01-2016 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell v/s in the 4th semester allowed and
State & Ors. of D.Ed course
direction is issued to respondent No.2 to
issue the required enrolment number on
the request of respondent No.3 dated
09.02.2011 (Annexure R-3/A) and declare
the result of the petitioner.
Needful be done within a period of one
month from the receipt of the certified
copy of this order
03-01-2019 Page 11 of 135

24 CWP 11619/18 Ram Kumar Reg.Grant notional In the light of afore-said facts and
09-05-2018 21-05-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-I (Lect.in History) seniority circumstances but without expressing any
v/s
opinion on the merits of the case, instant
State & Ors.
petition is disposed of
with a direction to respondent No.2 to look
into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioner in his representation dated
13.07.2017 (P-9) and to take a conscious
decision by passing a speaking order
considering all the facts narrated in the
aforesaid representation within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of a
However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved
by any of the orders passed by the
aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to
have recourse to other
remedies available to him under law
including to approach this Court.
25 CWP 11692/02 Shiv Charan Reg.Appointment as Accordingly, Annexures P-6 and P-9 are set
02-06-2017 28-07-2017 01-09-2017 Directorate LPA No.1943/17 has
HR(G-II) v/s H.M aside. Concerned respondent is hereby been filed by HSSC and
State & Ors.
directed to re-consider the petitioner's same is fixed for
claim for selection and appointment to the 27.02.18
post of Head Master notionally within a
period of three months from today.
Petition stands allowed accordingly.
26 CWP 11730/18 Raj Kumar & Reg.Benefit of Learned State counsel submits that the
10-05-2018 23-05-2018 18-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. Selection Grade claim/grievance of the petitioners as also
v/s
their legal notice, dated 14.02.2018
State & Ors.
(Annexure P-10), shall be
considered and dealt with within a period
of eight weeks from today. And appropriate
orders, in accordance with law, shall be
passed.
the above terms. However, in the event the
claim of the petitioners is declined, the
respondent authorities shall pass a
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 12 of 135

27 CWP 11764/18 Naresh Kumar & Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of at this stage
10-05-2018 12-06-2018 10-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. of service with a direction to respondent No.2 to
v/s
objectively consider the legal notice dated
State & Ors
7.2.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass a
speaking order therein within a period of
four
weeks from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order.
28 CWP 11783/18 Sher Singh & Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
10-05-2018 07-06-2018 06-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) Ors. pay after restoring merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s the benefits of
disposed of with a direction to respondents
State & Ors. adhoc relief and DA
cut as on 01.04.79 to consider the grievances unfolded by the
petitioners in the legal notice dated
decision by passing a speaking order as per
the judmgents referred to above in para
no.1 of this order, within a period of three
certified copy of this order. In case,
petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the
orders passed by the
aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty
to have recourse to the other remedies
available under law as well as to approach
this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 13 of 135

29 CWP 11869/00 Girwar Singh Quashing of The petitioner is entitled to give his salary
19-07-2013 23-08-2013 Directorate The full payment of
HR(AS) v/s termination order particulars from the date of his salary of the petitioner
State & Ors. passed by
termination of service till the age of is to be made by the
Management
superannuation and send a communication management. No action
through a registered post making a regarding the payment
demand for the amount which is due and is required to be taken
by the department.
payable with a copy mark to the State
Earlier an LPA
functionary as well. On such receipt, the No.2024/15 was filed by
respondent-Management shall pay the the management which
amount after satisfying itself about the was dismissed as
correctness of withdrawn with liberty
the minimum scale applicable. The to file appropriate
amounts shall be released with interest at application before the
9% from the respective date when they fell Ld. Single judge.
due till the Accordingly CM
date of payment. The State shall also No.1853/15 in CWP
No.4750/91 has been
ensure that the amount is duly released
filed by the
within the period as stipulated and secure management. The case
compliance report from the school. The is fixed for hearing on
State shall also be at liberty to take 02.11.18
appropriate action for the
misappropriation of funds that is clearly
evident from the facts disclosed in this writ
petition. It shall also be ensured that
if the amounts are not paid, appropriate
action as provided under the Act for
non-compliance of direction of statutory
breach is taken
against the management.
7. Both the writ petitions are ordered as
above.
30 CWP 11889/18 Kashmir Singh Reg.Grant the The writ petition is disposed of with
11-05-2018 22-06-2018 03-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Suhag & Ors. benefit of Selection direction to respondent No.1 to decide the
v/s Grade
legal notice (Annexure P-10), and pass
State & Ors.
speaking order thereupon, within a period
of six weeks from the date of receipt of a
03-01-2019 Page 14 of 135

31 CWP 11940/15 Shri Bhagwan Reg.Consider for the Be that as it may, once it is accepted that
30-07-2015 07-09-2015 Directorate The Hon'ble High Court
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi the facts of the present case are covered by granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
Subhash Chand's case (supra), the present No.1220 of 2015 against
writ petition is disposed of in the same the order dt.04.06.15
terms. passed in CWP
Since the main case has been decided, the No.5781/15 titled as
Subhash Chand Vs. State
of Haryana
32 CWP 11976/16 Geeta vVidya Reg.Quashing the Counsel appearing for the writ
28-06-2016 22-07-2016 21-09-2016 Directorate First Land is be provided
HR(PS) Mandir School, letter dt.21.3.16 petitioner submits that the writ petition by M.C shahabad to the
Shahbad, (Annexure P+8)
itself may be directed to be treated as a school. Report awaited
Markanda wherein direction
representation of the petitioner and a and reminder also has
v/s has been issued by
direction may be issued to the respondents been issued on 06.06.17
State & Ors. respondent No.3,
to consider the representation and pass an to Director Urban Local
not to make any
Bodies and DEO
admission from the appropriate orders within the time frame
Kurukshetra.
Academic Session fixed by this Court.
2016-17 In view of the above limited prayer Management of the
sought for by the counsel for the petitioner, school has not provide
the respondents are directed to treat the the reply of lease deed
writ petition itself as representation of the till now
petitioner-institution and dispose it within
two months from the date of receipt of the
order.
The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
03-01-2019 Page 15 of 135

33 CWP 12151/11 Saraswati Vidya Reg.Permanent For orders, see Civil Writ Petition
18-10-2012 29-11-2012 Directorate Matter is being
HR(PS) Mandir Recognition No.10273 of 2010 (Modern Hind Senior re-examined with regard
Sr.Sec.School
Secondary School, village Khori Lalan, to be students admitted
Siha
Tauru, District Mewat Vs. State of Haryana by the schools.
v/s
and others, decided on October 18,2012. Report has been
State & Ors.
received-Inquiry
Officer-pointed out
ORDER OF CWP NO.10273 OF 2010
schools in following
manners:-
The students, who have been admitted (i)Those who paid the
without any fault on their part, cannot be fine
made to suffer for this illegal action of the (ii)Those who had not
petitioner schools. Accordingly, their result paid the fine.
which has been declared is ordered to be (iii)those who paid the
regularised but this is no reason to permit partly
the Letters/Reminders have
petitioner schools to escape responsibility been prepared but not
issued yet because
for this action which is required to be
inquiry report is not
curbed so as to avoid its reoccurrence in complete regarding
future by any some schools
Institution. The case, thus, is made out to
burden the petitioners-Institutions with
costs of `6,000/- per students admitted by
petitioner -institutions in those classes for
which the petitioner-institutions did not
have recognition or affiliation from the
competent authority as is required by the
statute. Half of the cost imposed shall be
deposited in
the accounts of Legal Services Authority,
Haryana and the remaining half shall be
deposited in the Medication and
Conciliation Cell functioning in this Court.
The writ petitions otherwise are disposed
of
with the above directions.The copy of the
order be sent to the Director, School
Education, Haryana, for ensuring
compliance of the order.
The copy be also forwarded to the
Advocate General, Haryana to ensure that
the orders are properly complied with and
implemented to recover the costs/damages
and these are deposited in the appropriate
03-01-2019 Page 16 of 135
head as directed above.
34 CWP 12234/17 Balbir Singh & Reg.Promotion for For orders, see the detailed order of even
18-12-2017 04-04-2018 Directorate LPA is being filed.
PGT-II Ors. the post of date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s Headmaster High
Pal and others vs. The State of Haryana some objections in draft
State & Ors. School
and another’. of LPA
35 CWP 12283/18 Brahm Prakash Reg.Grant the pay Without expressing any opinion on the
16-05-2018 24-05-2018 23-09-2018 Directorate
Coordination & Ors. scale of 1600-2900 merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s w.e.f.01.01.96
State & Ors. instead of
1400-2600 and pay to look into the grievances unfolded by the
scale of 2000-3500 petitioners in the legal notice dated
from 24.1194 12.03.2018 (P-22) and to take a conscious
instead of decision by passing a speaking order
2000-3000. As the considering all the facts narrated in the
junior were getting aforesaid legal notice (P-22),
the higer pay scale within a period of four months from the
with all date of receipt of a certified copy of this
consequential
order.
benefits onwards
and entire arrears
However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved
also be released by any of the orders passed by the
alongwith the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty
interest@18%p.a to have recourse to the other remedies
this Court.
36 CWP 12527/15 Ravi Kumar Reg. Disciplinary In view of the above discussion, the
02-05-2016 10-08-2016 Directorate Sh.Roshan Lal, Retd. HCS
HR(G-II) v/s Proceeding against impugned show cause notice dated has been appointed for
State & Ors. the petitioner for
27.05.2015/29.02.2015 (Annexure P-7) is conduct inquiry. The
providing bogus
set aside. However, a liberty is granted to inquiry report is put up
experience
the respondents to proceed further and to Higher Authority.
certificate of Hindi
pass fresh order after affording proper A photocopy of the
Teacher
Enquiry Report sent to
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as
the applicant on
per law. I(n case, any enquiry has to be 30.05.17 and asked the
conducted, the enquiry report should be petitioner for submit his
made available before giving any fresh reply. Reply received
show cause notice to the petitioner. It is and file put up for show
also made clear that in case, any adverse cause notice
order is passed against the petitioner, he
will be at liberty to avail appropriate
remedy.
Allowed in the aforesaid terms.
03-01-2019 Page 17 of 135

37 CWP 12697/15 Kulwant Singh & Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626
PGT-I Ors. post of PGT of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus Matter
v/s
State of Haryana & another), decided on The Hon'ble High Court
State & Ors.
27.5.2015. granted stay in LPA
No.1215 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
Haryana
38 CWP 12849/15 Parveen Bala Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT judgment rendered by this Court in CWP Matter
State & Ors. Economics
No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 The Hon'ble High Court
titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of granted stay in LPA
Haryana and others. No.1220 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
of Haryana
39 CWP 12853/15 Meena Devi Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment Matter
State & Ors.
rendered by this Court in CWP No. 5781 of The Hon'ble High Court
2015 decided on 4.6.2015 titled as Subhash granted stay in LPA
Chand Vs. State of Haryana and others. No.1220 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 18 of 135

40 CWP 12879/14 Ritu Rani Reg.Appointment/S For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s election for the post passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
State & Ors. of PGT Hindi
Singh & others vs. State of Haryana &
another.
ORDER IN CWP NO.25682/14
Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that
the petitioners would be entitled for
appointment against the vacant seats
which were never
consumed being in the zone of
consideration and accordingly, the writ
petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall
be offered appointment letters
and the State should operate the merit list
in the respective categories in the subjects
of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there
are persons senior in merit than the
petitioners, they will firstly be offered the
said posts and in case the vacancies still
exist, the petitioners will be
accommodated. The
necessary exercise be concluded within a
period of two months from the date of
receipt of certified copy of the judgment.
41 CWP 12906/15 Jagrati Lunial Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 19 of 135

42 CWP 12936/15 Banke Behari Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGTHindi judgment Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
of Haryana
43 CWP 12937/15 Anita Rani Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT judgment rendered by this Court in CWP Matter
State & Ors.
No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 The Hon'ble High Court
titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of granted stay in LPA
Haryana and others. No.1220 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
of Haryana
44 CWP 12947/15 Vijay Kumari Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English judgment Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 20 of 135

45 CWP 12973/05 Jasbir Singh & Reg.Grant all Consequently, the present petition is
02-02-2017 25-04-2017 24-07-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination Ors. benefits of such disposed of in the same terms as order
v/s merger including
Annexure P-6. The petitioners are entitled
State & Ors. seniority, avenue of
promotion, parity in to 38 months arrears as well prior to filing
pay scales etc. of the present petition. The respondents
are directed to release the amount/s due to
the petitioners within a period of 3 months
of this order, failing which, the petitioners
would be entitled to interest @ 12% per
annum from the date/s the amount/s fell
due.
pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if
46 CWP 13023/18 Naresh Kumar & Reg.Deemed date of In view of the nature of the order being
22-05-2018 05-06-2018 31-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. regularization passed, there is no necessity to seek written
v/s
statement.
State & Ors.
The writ petition is disposed with direction
to respondent No.2 to objectively consider
(Annexure P-5) and to
pass a speaking order thereupon, within a
period of eight months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 21 of 135

47 CWP 13064/15 Kartar Singh Reg.Closing of Block The petitioner, who is a teacher and
03-07-2015 20-07-2015 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell v/s Institutes of resident of District Sirsa, has filed this
State & Ors. Teacher Education
petition challenging the decision of the
State Government to close down Block
Institutes for Teacher Education (BITE) at
Ambala and
Sirsa, with effect from 30.06.2015. In this
regard, the petitioner has also submitted a
detailed representation dated 19.06.2015
to the Chief Secretary to the Government of
Haryana, copy of which has been annexed
with the petition as Annexure P-22.
After hearing learned counsel for the
petitioner, without issuing notice of motion
as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we
deem it appropriate to dispose of this
petition with a direction to the Chief
Secretary
to Government of Haryana, to consider and
decide the said representation in
accordance with law, expeditiously,
keeping in view the needs of the area.
Ordered accordingly.
48 CWP 13100/18 Lichhma Devi Reg.Regularization The writ petition is disposed of with
22-05-2018 12-06-2018 13-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service w.e.f. direction to respondent No.2, to consider
State & Os. 01.04.11 as the date
of the juniors
alongwith all the (Annexures P-9) and pass a speaking
consequential order thereupon within a period of eight
benefits including weeks from the date of receipt of a certified
arrear copy of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 22 of 135

49 CWP 13274/18 Ramesh Chand Reg.Grant pay scale Without expressing any opinion on the
30-07-2018 14-08-2018 13-02-2019 Directorate Draft of speaking order
Sec. Arya & Ors. to the petitioner at merits of the case but considering the is under process for
v/s par admissible in
afore-said aspects that the respondents are vetting
State & Ors. Kurukshetra
University already seisin of the
matter, instant petition is disposed of with
the direction to respondents to look into
the grievances unfolded by the petitioners
in representation 17.04.2017 (Annexure
P-14) and to decide the same in
accordance with law, rules and regulations
as well as in view of the judgments
mentioned in para 1 of this order, within a
period of six months from the date of
In case, the petitioners still feel aggrieved
concerned authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse to the other
remedies available under law including
filing of writ petition.
50 CWP 13324/18 Dharma Devi Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of with a direction
24-05-2018 25-06-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service to respondent No. 2, to objectively consider
State & Ors.
the Legal Notice dated 16.02.2018
(Annexure P-7) and pass a
of eight weeks from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order
51 CWP 13339/15 Hardhyan Singh Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I & Anr. post of PGT Hindi judgment Matter
v/s
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 23 of 135

52 CWP 13344/15 Anant Pal Reg.Promotion Thus, if a TGT (History) seeks promotion as
PGT-II v/s a PGT (History) and has two years A.G.Haryana raised
State & Ors.
teaching experience in the said subject, as some objections in draft
also a post graduate degree in of LPA
History, she/he would be eligible to be
promoted as such PGT immediately,
provided thereafter she/he clears the
HTET/SLET/SET within 4 years of
promotion, failing which she/he shall be
reverted to the post of a TGT.
With the aforesaid directions, these
petitions are disposed of. No order as to
costs.
53 CWP 13470/18 Surti Devi Reg.Regularization The present petition is disposed of with the
28-05-2018 05-07-2018 04-10-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to
State & Ors.
decide the legal notice dated 16.02.2018 by
passing a speaking order after hearing the
petitioners with regard to the claim for
antedated regularization. The decision be
taken within three months from the date of
receipt of the certified copy of the order.
With this direction, the petition stands
disposed of.
54 CWP 13475/18 Virender Singh & Reg.Promotion for In these circumstances, this writ petition is
09-07-2018 03-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) Ors. the post of dismissed at this stage. However, the
v/s Headmaster
State & Ors.
respondents are directed to look into the
representations/legal notices of the
petitioners as also the representation sent
by the Haryana State Lecturers’
Association and take such suitable action
on them as is deemed fit and proper for
which petitioners and Haryana State
Lecturers’ Association deserve to be heard
and conveyed a decision thereon within a
reasonable time.
03-01-2019 Page 24 of 135

55 CWP 13521/15 Manju Lata Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626
PGT-I v/s post of PGT of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
56 CWP 13544/10 Ravinder Kumar Reg.Release of It is apparent from the facts as mentioned
30-07-2015 17-09-2015 Directorate File submitted to F.D
PGT-II v/s Salary with 18% above that there was no fault on the part
State & Ors. interest alongwith
of the petitioner and the petitioner has
all consequential
benefits been harassed by sending him at different
places where post was not
vacant. The absence from duty cannot be
attributed to the petitioner in any manner
and as such, the present writ petition is
allowed and the petitioner is held entitled
to the salary for the period, he has been
treated as absent from his duties and the
respondents are directed to release the
salary and to regularize the petitioner for
that period.
57 CWP 13628/18 Chameli Devi Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of with a direction
28-05-2018 15-06-2018 11-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service to respondent No. 2, to objectively consider
State & Ors.
the Legal Notice dated 25.03.2018
(Annexure P-7) and pass a
58 CWP 13667/18 Dr.Usha Rani & Reg.Grant Selection The petition is disposed of with direction to
28-05-2018 08-08-2018 19-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. Grade respondent No.1 to decide the legal notice
v/s w.e.f.01.01.2000
(Annexure P-10) and pass a speaking order
State & Ors.
thereupon, within a period of six weeks
this order
03-01-2019 Page 25 of 135

59 CWP 1368/12 Virender Singh Reg.Pay Scale w.e.f Short question for consideration in the
20-04-2017 08-06-2017 19-07-2017 Directorate LPA filed and same is
HRME-II v/s 27.04.08 instead of present petition is whether the petitioner fixed for 19.09.18
State & Ors. 21.04.11
could be promoted to the post of
Superintendent w.e.f.
26.04.2008 or not? The method of
recruitment to the post of Superintendent
grade is from Deputy Superintendent grade
with 3 years of
experience. The petitioner is stated to have
been promoted to the post of Deputy
Superintendent on 27.04.2005. He would
be completing 3 years of service as Deputy
Superintendent on 26.04.2008. However, it
is to be noted that on 29.09.2006 itself
Superintendent post was available.
Consequently, the petitioner was promoted
to the post of Superintendent on his own
pay
scale (Deputy Superintendent). For want of
experience qualification of 3 years in the
Deputy Superintendent between
29.09.2006 to 21.04.2011, the petitioner
has not been displaced from the post of
Superintendent. In other words, the
petitioner continued to hold the post of
Superintendent between 29.09.2006 to
21.04.2011. Therefore, the date of
promotion to the post of Superintendent is
required to be rectified from 21.04.2011 to
26.04.2008, the date on which the
petitioner has completed 3 years of service
in the cadre of Deputy Superintendent for
the purpose of promotion to the post of
Superintendent. Accordingly, the
competent authority is hereby directed to
rectify the date of promotion to the post of
Superintendent from 21.04.2011 to
26.04.2008 and further extend the
consequential benefits including the
monetary benefits from 26.04.2008 in the
cadre of Superintendent.
6. Above exercise shall be completed by the
concerned respondent within a period of 3
03-01-2019 Page 26 of 135
months from today.
7. CWP stands allowed.
60 CWP 13774/15 Anindita Reg.Consider for the The present writ petition is allowed, in
PGT-I v/s post of PGT terms of order dated 27.05.2015 passed in Matter
State & Ors.
CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail The Hon'ble High Court
Kaur and others vs. State of Haryana and granted stay in LPA
another. No.1215 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
Gurmail Kaur Vs.
State of Haryana
61 CWP 13843/18 Rajesh Kumar & Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of with direction to
29-05-2018 15-06-2018 11-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Anr. of Service respondent No. 2, to objectively consider
v/s
the legal notice dated
State & Ors.
16.01.2018(Annexure P-4) and pass a
62 CWP 13876/15 Parveen Kumar Reg.Consider for the The present writ petition is allowed, in
PGT-I v/s post of PGT terms of order dated 27.05.2015 passed in Matter
State & Ors.
CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail The Hon'ble High Court
Kaur and others vs. State of Haryana and granted stay in LPA
another. No.1215 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
Haryana
63 CWP 14266/11 Mange Ram Saini Reg.Retiral Benefits Keeping in view the prayer made in the
14-05-2015 19-06-2015 18-10-2015 Directorate Recalling order by filing
PEN-II v/s petition, the present CM No.10564/15 and
State & Ors.
petition is allowed with a direction to the same is fixed for hearing
competent authority, to on 20.11.15 and Hon'ble
consider and decide the case of the Court granted stay stay
petitioner, in terms of judgment in till the decision of SLP
No.38930/15
LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of
Haryana and another Vs.
Harbans Lal and others', decided on
08.10.2012, by passing a
speaking order, within a period of four
months from the date of receipt
of a certified copy of this order.
14.05.2015
03-01-2019 Page 27 of 135
64 CWP 14466/18 Shakuntla Arora Reg.Same cadre and Without expressing any opinion on the
10-07-2018 24-07-2018 23-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in.History stepping up benefit merits of the case, the instant petition is
Retd.) being claimed with
v/s the same scheduled
State & Ors. caste junior teacher respondent No.1-Financial
in the cadre and Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of
further by notional Haryana, Education Department, Haryana
pay fixation and Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into
pension revision the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
and other retiral representation dated 29.09.2017
benefits with (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in
interest accordance with Rules, Regulations and
order passed by
(P-5), within a period of 3 months from the
date of receipt of certified copy of this
order.
concerned authority, she shall be at liberty
available under law including filing of writ
petition.
65 CWP 14521/18 Ramesh Kumar Reg.Regularization The petition is disposed of with direction to
31-05-2018 19-06-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service respondent No.2 to objectively consider the
State & Ors.
legal notice (Annexure P-5) and pass a
speaking order
thereupon, within a period of eight weeks
this order.
03-01-2019 Page 28 of 135

66 CWP 14620/18 OK Play India Reg.Petitioner filed This petition is disposed of with liberty to
10-07-2018 21-08-2018 Directorate
A&A Limited a writ in the nature the petitioner to approach the
v/s of mandamus or any
administrative head of Taxation
State & Ors. other writ, direction
or order in the Department, Haryana in the light of the
nature thereof to advisory letter dated 23.8.2016 to take a
the Respondent Nos. decision. It is expected that from the date
1-.3 directing them when a representation is made to the State
to comply with the Government through the Principal
advice/direction of Secretary, the decision will be taken within
Respondent No.4 three months. However, it will be open to
dated 23.08.2016 as the authority to examine the question of
annexed herewith
delay as well.
as Annexure 12
and/or directing the
Respondent Nos.1-3
to
refund/reimburse
all payments due to
the petitioner as set
out in Annexure-14.
67 CWP 14800/18 Ranbir Singh Reg.Selection Grade Instant petition is disposed of with a
01-06-2018 12-06-2018 11-09-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV v/s direction to respondents to look into the
State & Ors.
and to take a conscious decision by passing
a speaking order particularly in the light of
the judgment rendered in Jagat Singh
Yadav's case (supra), within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of a
aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty
this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 29 of 135

68 CWP 14877/18 Garima Sharma Reg.Appointment The writ petition is disposed of with a
01-06-2018 12-06-2018 10-07-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT direction to
State & Ors.
respondent No. 2 to objectively consider
the legal notice dated 29.3.2018 (Annexure
P-4), by passing a speaking order
thereupon, within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt of a
69 CWP 14915/18 Bhagwan Dass Reg.Counting Without expressing any opinion on the
14-08-2018 31-08-2018 30-12-2018 Directorate
PEN-II v/s Seniority w.e.f. 1991 merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors.
to look into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioner in the legal notice dated
decision by passing a speaking order,
within a period of four months from the
date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order.
approach this Court.
70 CWP 14953/15 Jaspal Singh Reg.Consider for teh The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
rendered by this Court in CWP No. 5781 of No.1220 of 2015 against
2015 decided on 4.6.2015 titled as Subhash the order dt.04.06.15
Chand Vs. State of Haryana and others. passed in CWP
Subhash Chand Vs.State
of Haryana
71 CWP 14980/18 Chajju Ram & Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
01-06-2018 15-06-2018 11-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. of Service merits of the case, the respondents are
v/s
directed to consider and decide the legal
State & Ors.
notice dated 1.3.2018 (Annexure P-5)
within a period of eight weeks from the
date of
The petition stands disposed of with the
above directions.
03-01-2019 Page 30 of 135

72 CWP 15072/13 Shanta Kumari Reg.Promotion for Petitioner's grievance is relating to

02-06-2017 03-08-2017 01-09-2017 Directorate LPA has been filed
HR(G-I) Narang the post of Principal promotion to the post of Principal in HES-II
v/s
Cadre. Petitioner's name was not
State & Ors.
considered for promotion on 20.7.2007 for
want of service records. In this regard,
respondent-Department have stated in
their reply statement that they have asked
for annual confidential report of the
petitioner from the Chandigarh
Administration since petitioner was on
deputation as on 25.7.2007.
Whereas, the Chandigarh Administration
have disputed the communication dated
25.7.2007 stating that no such letter has
been received by the office of Chandigarh
Administration or concerned Principal,
Government Senior Secondary School,
Sector 35-D, Chandigarh. Petitioner is
stated to have attained age of
superannuation and retired from service.
In view of the above facts and
c i r c u m s t a n c e s S t a t e
Government-Commissioner and Secretary
to Government of Haryana Education
Department is hereby directed to set right
the petitioner's service record and consider
petitioner's name for promotion to the post
of Principal in HES-II Cadre for officiating
capacity from 20.7.2007 and extend all
service benefits including monetary
benefits during the intervening period from
20.07.2007 till petitioner attains age of
superannuation and retired from service.
The above exercise shall be completed
within a period of 3 months from today.
Accordingly, petition stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 31 of 135

73 CWP 15075/18 Maha Singh Reg.Count previous Without expressing any opinion on the
01-06-2018 11-07-2018 10-10-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s part time service for merits of the case but considering the
State & Ors. the purpose of
afore-said aspects, instant petition is
pensionary benefits
No. 2 and 3 to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioner in the legal
notice dated 15.02.2018 (P-5) and to take
a conscious decision in accordance with
law, rules, regulations and instructions
issued by the Government from time to
time, within a period of three months from
the
date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order.
have recourse to other remedies available
under law including to approach this
Court.
74 CWP 1556/14 Rajesh Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Physics judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
75 CWP 15588/15 Sri Hari Krishan Reg.Permission for In view of the aforesaid submissions and
13-07-2015 13-08-2015 20-08-2015 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell Education D.Ed Courses prayer made by the petitioner, respondent
Society
No.2 is directed to decide the prayer of the
v/s
State & Ors. petitioner, which is still pending with it,
having been sent by respondent No.3,
within a period of seven days from the date
of
receipt of certified copy of this order by
passing a speaking order, in accordance
with law.
Disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 32 of 135

76 CWP 15605/15 Seema Reg.Consider for the The present writ petition is allowed, in
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English terms of judgment dated 04.06.2015 granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
rendered in CWP No.5781 of 2015 titled as No.1220 of 2015 against
Subhash Chand vs. State of Haryana and the order dt.04.06.15
others. passed in CWP
of Haryana
77 LPA 1561/16 in Sunil Kumar Reg.Transfer of Though the permission, if any granted by
26-08-2016 19-09-2016 Directorate
CWP v/s Guest Faculty the Competent Authority for joining LLB
No.16274/16 State & Ors.
degree is not on record, nevertheless, we
PGT-II
are of
the considered view that transfer being an
incidence of service, learned Single Judge
has rightly declined to interfere with the
same. However, the appellant may
approach the Competent Authority and
make out a case based
upon the mitigating circumstances,
including the utility of LLB degree with
reference to the nature of duties he is
required to perform. We have no
reason to doubt that the Competent
Authority shall sympathetically consider
the appellant's request. It shall be
appreciated if the decision is taken within
a period of one month from the date of
making a request by the appellant.
78 CWP 1567/17 Om Parkash & Reg.Refixation/ACP In my opinion, it would be appropriate if
30-01-2017 06-02-2017 29-03-2017 Directorate Speaking orders are
PGT-IV Ors. the present writ petition is treated as being passed
v/s
representation and respondent No.2
State & Ors.
decides the same by passing speaking order
within two months from today.
Ordered accordingly. However, it is made
clear that till the passing of the speaking
order, recovery shall not be made from the
petitioners.
Disposed of accordingly.
Copy of this order be given dasti to the
learned State counsel under the signatures
of Reader/Bench Secretary.
03-01-2019 Page 33 of 135

79 CWP 15725/17 Pinki & Ors. Reg.Step-up of their Consequently, this petition is disposed of
20-07-2017 22-08-2017 21-12-2017 Directorate
PGT-II v/s pay with a direction to the competent
State & Ors.
authority amongst the respondents to take
a decision on the legal
notice of the petitioners (Annexure P-6),
dated 22.11.2016, in terms of the judgment
of this Court in Neelam Rani (supra) within
a period of 4 months from the date of
If the petitioners' case is not covered by the
aforesaid judgment or any other judgment
on the subject, detailed reasons as to why it
is not
covered, shall be given in the speaking
order to be passed.
It is also clarified that in case a speaking
order has already been passed giving such
detailed reasons, then only a short order
need be passed now, annexing therewith
detailed order already passed (if any).
80 CWP 1573/15 Surinder Kaur & Reg.Consider for the After hearing learned counsel for the
29-01-2015 10-02-2015 09-04-2015 Directorate 13/24-15 HRL-I(4)
PGT-I Anr. post of PGT Punjabi petitioners, however, without opining on Report from DVC
v/s & Mathematics
the merits of the controversy, the present awaited
State & Ors.
petition is disposed of at this stage with a
direction to respondent No. 2 to take a
final decision on the show cause notices
issued to the petitioners, to which they
have already filed replies, within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of
copy of the order.
81 CWP 15850/15 Purushotam Reg.Promotion For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II Dutt date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s
State & Ors
03-01-2019 Page 34 of 135

82 LPA 1587/15 in Maman Singh Reg Intrest @ 18% The matter is remanded to the disciplinary
14-03-2018 19-07-2018 18-10-2018 Directorate File put up to W.ACSSE
CWP v/s p.a on authority to proceed afresh in the matter.
No.22188/14 State & Ors. unpaid/delayed
Needful be done withing three months
HR(G-I) payment of leave
encashment, from the date of receipt of certified copy of
gratuity and this order after applying report dated
commuted value of 02.05.12 and after affording an
pension opportunity to the appellant to move
representation, if any. Disciplinary
authority would proceed to decide the
matter afresh and would determine the
outcome of the action, if any, to be taken
against the appellant.
Appeal is allowed in aforementioned terms.
83 CWP 15917/18 Ombir & Anr. Reg.Regularization The present petition is disposed of with a
04-07-2018 25-07-2018 24-09-2018 Directorate
State & Ors.
consider and decide the legal notice
(Annex.P-4) by passing an appropriate
order after hearing the petitioners.
Let the exercise be completed within a
period of two
months from the date of receiving of a
84 CWP 15927/18 Lilu Ram Reg.Regularization The present petition is disposed of with a
04-07-2018 17-07-2018 16-09-2018 Directorate
State & Ors.
consider and decide the representations
and legal notice (Annex. P-6 & P-7) by
passing an appropriate order after hearing
the petitioner.
Let the exercise be completed within a
period of two
months from the date of receiving of a
03-01-2019 Page 35 of 135

85 COCP 1593/18 Namrata Kumari Reg.Transfer This court feels that another opportunity
18-05-2018 25-05-2018 17-06-2018 Directorate
in CWP (Lect.in.Sociolog needs to be granted to the concerned
No.8584/18 y)
officer to decide the representation and to
PGT-II v/s
Smt.Dheera purge the contempt.
Khandelwal, IAS He may take a decision on the
representation within one month from
today.
In case needful is not done, petitioner shall
be at liberty to seek revival of the petition.
In that eventuality, this court shall
consider imposition of punitive costs. Same
shall be deductible from the salary of the
officer(s) responsible for
non-compliance/delay.
Disposed of.
86 CWP 15967/05 Dilawar Singh & Reg.Grant all Consequently, the present petition is
02-02-2017 25-04-2017 24-07-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination Ors. benefits of such disposed of in the same terms as order
Annexure P-5. The petitioners are entitled
promotion, parity in to 38 months arrears as well prior to filing
pay scales etc. of the present petition. The respondents
are directed to release the amount/s due to
the petitioners within a period of 3 months
of this order,
failing which, the petitioners would be
entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from
the date/s the amount/s fell due.
pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if
03-01-2019 Page 36 of 135

87 CWP 15997/00 Amrik Singh Reg.Promotion for Concerned respondents are directed to
27-01-2017 14-03-2017 26-05-2017 Directorate
PGT-II v/s the post of Lecturer verify the service particulars of the
State & Ors. in Punjabi
petitioners as well as juniors to the
petitioners and if the petitioners are
otherwise eligible to the post of Lecturer in
Punjabi, their name shall be considered for
promotion to the post of Lecturer in
Punjabi from the date of juniors'
promotion i.e. 24.3.1998. The above
exercise shall
be completed within a period of four
months from today. Further consequential
benefits including monetary benefits i.e.
difference of pay shall be extended to the
petitioners.
Disposed of in the above terms.
88 CWP 16042/18 Satish Kumar Reg.Pay protection Without making any comments on the
05-07-2018 16-07-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s granted to the legal position, the prayer of the petitioner
State & Ors. petitioner in lieu of
is accepted to the extent that the orders
his past service
rendered by him as have been passed without notice and
PGT Hindi with the hearing which prejudice the rule of
Kendriya Vidyalaya audi alteram partem, and, therefore, this
from 24.06.03 to petition is allowed to the limited extent
27.07.09 has been that the orders Annex. P-12 & P-13 are
withdrawn and quashed and the respondents are directed
recovery of arrears to pass a fresh order in accordance with
has been ordered. law within one month after hearing the
petitioner on the representation already
filed by him.
Disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 37 of 135

89 CWP 1610/05 Sudesh Sehgal In the light of what has been discussed
16-02-2018 05-03-2018 15-04-2018 Directorate As the main file related
HR(G-I) v/s above, the petition is disposed of with the to court case is missing.
State & Ors.
direction to the respondents to consider As the petitioner
the bills submitted by the provided the medical
petitioner in the light of instructions so far bills to the department
it pertains to the period prior to the though Director SCERT
& thereafter, we sent the
implementation of Rules 2001 and to
case of petitioner to
consider the other bills within the purview health department.
of Rules 2001, within a period of two From then onwards, we
months and if the concerned authority are unable to find out
comes to the conclusion that petitioner is these medical bills and
entitled to the reimbursement of medical when
bills or to partial amount thereof, the same department/concerned
shall be calculated and dealing approached this
disbursed to the petitioner within a period petitioner for providing
of next 1 month. copy of medical bills, she
refused to give copy of
In the event of non-compliance of this
these medical bills.
order, petitioner shall be entitled to
interest @ 9% per annum from the date of
filing of instant petition till
actual payment.
90 CWP 16277/13 Rani Devi Gupta Reg.Charge of Counsel for the petitioner, however,
28-07-2017 08-09-2017 07-12-2017 Directorate 4/87-13 AS(2)
HR(AS) v/s Principal and DDO submits that the only grievance would be However in
State & Ors. power
as to whether the petitioner would be representation filed by
entitled for the benefits of promotion for the petitioner in this
the prior period. He submits that he would Directorate in AS Branch
file a detailed representation as such with & hence no action is to
be taken at Directorate
the respondents, who could take into
level.
consideration the same and take a decision
on the same within a period of three
months from the date of the receipt of the
said request.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is
disposed of in the above said terms
03-01-2019 Page 38 of 135

91 CWP 16340/11 Narinder Kumar Reg.Grant due and Smt. Shanti Devi (now deceased) was
01-02-2018 20-03-2018 19-09-2018 Directorate 13/214-15ME(3)
HRME-I v/s proper appointed as a Sweeper with respondent
State & Ors. compensation after
No.3 on 01.03.1971. Her services were
holding the
termination of the terminated on
deceased work-lady 18.04.2000. She raised an industrial
dispute and it was decided against her on
the score that during pendency of
Reference No.688 of 2002 decided by the
Labour Court she has died. Thus, legal heir
of deceased Smt. Shanti Devi – Narinder
Kumar pursued the matter before the
Labour Court.
However, Labour Court has failed to
appreciate the length of service rendered
by the deceased employee from 01.03.1971
to 18.4.2000 so as to
extend benefit of compensation under the
provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Thus, feeling aggrieved by the award
passed by the Labour Court, presented this
petition by legal heir of deceased –
Narinder Kumar. Labour Court has failed
to appreciate the length of service
rendered by the deceased employee as a
Sweeper from 01.03.1971 to 18.4.2000.
Even though deceased employee died
during pendency of the Reference No.688
of 2002, Labour Court should have
appreciated length of service for the
purpose of extending the benefit of
compensation under the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947. Accordingly, award
passed by the Labour Court dated
29.12.2010 (Annexure P/5) is set aside.
Respondents are directed to pay
compensation of ` 6,00,000/- to the legal
heir of deceased Smt. Shanti Devi within a
period of six months from today, failing
which legal heir is entitled to interest @ 6
% per annum on the compensation amount
from today.
Petition stands allowed.
03-01-2019 Page 39 of 135

92 CWP 16347/18 Prithvi Singh & Reg.Selection Grade Keeping in view the above, the present writ
09-07-2018 20-07-2018 31-12-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. petition is disposed of by giving directions
v/s
to the respondents No.2 and 3 to look into
State & Ors.
the representation (Annexure P-9) as per
judgment (Annexure P-8) passed by this
Court and decide the same preferably
within the period of six months.
93 CWP 16474/18 Subhash Reg.Regularization This petition is disposed of by giving
10-07-2018 24-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Chander & Anr. of Service direction to pass appropriate orders on the
v/s
legal notice dated 25.04.2018 (Annexure
State & Ors.
P-7) keeping in view the orders passed in
favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) in
94 CWP 16495/15 Surender Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in terms of
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi judgment rendered by this Court in CWP granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 No.1220 of 2015 against
titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of the order dt.04.06.15
Haryana and others. passed in CWP
of Haryana
95 CWP 16512/18 Mukhtyar Singh Reg.Regularization As the matter in controversy is restricted to
23-10-2018 30-10-2018 29-01-2019 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service that point only and petitioner has already
State & Ors.
got issued legal notice dated 25.04.2018
(Annexure
P7), present writ petition stands disposed
of with the directions to the respondents to
look into and take the required action on
legal notice
(Annexure P7) expeditiously and preferably
within a period of three months from the
order.
96 CWP 16515/18 Rohtash Kumar Reg.Regularization This petition is disposed of by giving
10-07-2018 14-08-2018 13-02-2018 Directorate
HRME-I & Ors. of Service direction to pass appropriate orders on the
v/s
State & Ors.
P-5) keeping in view the orders passed in
favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) within
receipt of certified copy of the order.
03-01-2019 Page 40 of 135

97 CWP 16569/17 Kulbhushan Reg.Grant benefit of Consequently, this petition is disposed of

28-07-2017 13-09-2017 12-12-2017 Directorate Claim has been accepted
HR(G-I) Sharma & Ors. Selection Grade with a direction to the competent and DEO,s are being
v/s w.e.f. 01.82000
authority amongst the respondents herein directed to release the
State & Ors. instead of 01.01.96
to take a decision on the aforesaid legal benefits.
notice, within a period of three months
of this order.
98 CWP 16905/18 Dharam Pal Reg.Promotion for Keeping in view that the claimants-Kiran
13-07-2018 02-08-2018 24-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) (Lect.in.Pol.Sci.) the post of Bala and others have already been
v/s Headmaster
compromised the matter by filing the
State & Ors.
appeal i.e. FAO No.1955 of 1995 before the
Lok Adalat on 07.04.1999 by accepting
Rs.1,40,000/- over and above as enhanced
amount of compensation, the present cross
objection
filed by them is also dismissed.
99 CWP 1699/18 Kunwal Pal Reg.Benefits of Without making any comment on the
25-01-2018 19-02-2018 18-05-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Singh & Ors. selection grade of merits of the case, this petition is disposed
v/s Rs. 7500-12000
of with a direction to the competent
State & Ors. w.e.f. 01.01.96
instead of authority amongst the respondents to
01.08.2000 decide the legal notice dated
9.11.2017(Annexure P-10) by passing a
speaking order after hearing the
petitioners or their representatives within
a period of three months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of this order. In
case the benefit
is granted, there will be no need to pass a
speaking order and the claim can be
decided by passing office order. In case an
adverse order is proposed then necessity of
hearing will arise.
100 Execution Rajinder Kumar Reg.Suspension The petitioner may file the application
29-11-2017 19-12-2017 18-04-2018 Directorate
17/12 in CWP Saroha within a period of 4 weeks from today and
No.7978/08 v/s
on the receipt of the comments, the
HR(AS) State & Ors.
exercise be completed within a period of 3
months, thereafter.
With the above said liberty, the present
execution application is disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 41 of 135

101 CWP 17219/18 Pushpa Kalra & Reg.Selection Grade Without expressing any opinion on the
01-08-2018 28-08-2018 27-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors
No.2-The Director,
Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha
Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the
a speaking order in view of
the judgments referred in the aforesaid
legal notice (P-10), within a period of three
certified copy of this order. However, if
orders passed by the aforesaid authority,
they shall be at liberty to have recourse to
other remedies available under law as well
as to approach this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 42 of 135

102 CWP 17221/16 Om Pal @ Om Pal Reg. Countersign In view of the above factual position, the
18-09-2018 29-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-I Sharma the Experience writ petition stands allowed and direction
v/s Certificate of the
is given to respondent No. 2 to countersign
State & Ors. petitioner dated
01.06.2016 the experience
(Annexure P-10) certificate of the petitioner dated
issued by 01.06.2016 (Annexure P-10) so that the
respondent no.6 for petitioner can participate in the selection
teaching as PGT process of PGT Sanskrit, pursuant to
Teacher, in view of advertisement dated 28.06.2015
facts and
circumstance of the
present case and
also keeping in view
the fact that
petitioner taught
PGT classes. It is
further prayed that
respondents no.3 be
directed to keep a
post vacant for the
post of PGT
(Sanskrti)
advertised vide
no.4/2015 dt.
28.06.15 during the
pendency of present
writ petition in the
interest of justice
103 CWP 17308/18 Subhash Reg.Counting the This petition is disposed of with a direction
18-07-2018 14-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Chander & Ors whole service from to the respondents to consider and decide
v/s deemed date of
the legal notice dated 12.04.2018 (P-3) in
State & Ors. appointment for
qualifying service accordance with law. The decision be taken
for pension from expeditiously.
12.04.90, benefit of
children allowance,
ACP, correct pay
fixation and
seniority
03-01-2019 Page 43 of 135

104 CWP 17329/13 Madan Lal Reg.Revised Keeping in view the prayer made in the
PEN-II Makkar & Ors. Pensionary Benefits petition, the present petition is allowed CM No.11063/15 and
v/s
with a direction to the competent same is fixed for hearing
State & Ors.
authority, to consider and decide the case on 05.11.15 and Hon'ble
of the petitioner in terms of judgment in Court granted stay till
LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as State of the decision of SLP
No.38930/15
Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and
others decided on 08.10.2012 by passing a
speaking order, within a period of four
copy of this order.
105 CWP 17484/18 Smt.Bimla Devi Reg.Regularization In view of the above fact, at this stage, the
14-08-2018 27-09-2018 08-11-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service present petition is disposed of by giving
State & Ors.
direction to the respondents to look into
the representation/legal notices of the
petitioner dated 15.03.2018 & 20.05.2018
(Annexures P-11 & P-12) and pass
appropriate speaking order(s) in
accordance with law within a period of six
weeks from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order
106 CWP 1760/14 Ravinder Singh Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
107 CWP 17601/17 Shyam Sunder Reg.Promotion for Consequently, this petition is disposed of
29-08-2017 22-09-2017 21-12-2017 Directorate Matter is under
HR(G-I) Ahuja the post of Principal with a direction to the competent consideration
v/s
authority amongst the respondents to take
State & Ors.
a decision on the aforesaid legal notice of
the petitioners, by passing a speaking
order within a period of three months from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order.
03-01-2019 Page 44 of 135

108 CWP 17606/16 Dr.Sunil Kumar Reg.Transfer The Director General School Education will
29-08-2016 14-09-2016 17-09-2016 Directorate
PGT-II v/s look into this grievance within two or three
State & Ors.
days from the date of receipt of the order
and take a fair and just decision on the
representation on this special feature
which constitutes the ground of challenge.
Disposed of.
109 CWP 17719/14 Sandeep Kumar Reg.Consequential Consequently, this writ petition is allowed
02-07-2015 24-08-2015 23-11-2015 Directorate LPA No.214/16 has been
HR(G-I) & Ors. benefits of and the respondents are directed to work filed and admitted. To be
v/s promotion
out arrears and pay the same to the heard within one year.
iState & Ors. including arrears of
petitioner within three months from the Stayed the impugned
pay which were
date of receipt of certified copy of this order
payable to the said
Sh.Ved Pal Singh order, failing which the petitioner would
be entitled to claim the same with interest
@ 8% p.a from the date/s the same fell due
till the date of payment.
110 CWP 17743/16 Pawan Singh Reg.Transfer The Director General School Education will
30-08-2016 06-09-2016 09-09-2016 Directorate
PGT-II v/s look into this grievance within two or three
State & Ors.
days from the date of receipt of the order
and take a fair and just decision on the
representation on this special feature
which constitutes the ground of challenge.
Disposed of.
111 CWP 18010/17 Balbir Singh Reg.Grant of Accordingly, instant petition is treated as
17-08-2017 26-09-2017 25-12-2017 Directorate
HR(G-II) Sheoran & Ors. Additional representation on behalf of the petitioners
v/s Increment
and is disposed of with a direction to
State & Ors.
respondent(s) to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in the instant
petition (representation) and decide the
same particularly in view of Government of
Haryana Circular dated 24.04.2014
bearing Memo No.10/01/2014-3GSII
(Annexure P-1), within
03-01-2019 Page 45 of 135

112 CWP 18183/15 Ravinder Kumar Reg.Pay Fixation Accordingly, at this stage, without
31-08-2015 15-09-2015 14-01-2016 Directorate 13/166-15 HRL-II(3)
PGT-II v/s commenting on the merits of the case, the
State & Ors.
writ petition is disposed of with a direction File put up to Higher
to respondent No.2 Authority for
to take decision on the legal notice dated compliance. Matter
05.03.2015 (Annexures P-7) issued on under consideration for
seniority
behalf of the petitioner by passing a
speaking order and after affording
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,
preferably within four months from the
order.
Needless to add that the decision so taken
be communicated to the petitioner and if
the decision is not to the satisfaction of the
petitioner,
he would be at liberty to challenge the
same, in accordance with law.
113 CWP 18496/14 Parveen Kumari Reg.Appointment/S Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that
13-11-2017 04-12-2017 03-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s election for the post the petitioners would be entitled for
which were never
accommodated. The
03-01-2019 Page 46 of 135

114 CWP 18496/14 Parveen Kumari Reg.Appointment/S For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s election for the post passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
another.
which were never
accommodated. The
03-01-2019 Page 47 of 135

115 CWP 18551/14 Geetu Reg.Consider for the For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Skt. passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
State & Ors.
another.
which were never
accommodated. The
116 CWP 18577/15 Krishan Chander Reg.Two year In view of all that has been discussed above
24-07-2018 14-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s extension in service and in view of ratio laid down by the
State & Ors. due to handicapped
judgment in the case of Ram Kishan
Sharma's case (supra), the prayer of the
petitioner could not be rejected on the
ground that the application for extension
of service was made by the petitioner only
one day before retirement. With these
observations, this writ petition is being
allowed and the respondents are directed
to extend the benefit of extension
of service for two years from 58 to 60 years
on the ground of physical disability as per
Instructions (Annexures P-1 to P-3) with all
consequential
benefits
03-01-2019 Page 48 of 135

117 CWP 18627/18 Girdhari Lal & Reg.Selection Grade Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
31-07-2018 28-08-2018 27-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. with a direction to respondent
v/s
No.2-Director of Secondary Education
State & Ors.
Haryana, Panchkula to
consider the case unfolded by the
petitioners in legal notice (P-7) and to
decide the same in the light of letter dated
12.12.2000 (P-1) as well as judgment
passed by this Court in CWP No.8082 of
2001, titled as “R.K. Verma and ors. v. State
of Haryana and anr.”, decided on
01.12.2010 (P-2), which has attained
finality by way of dismissal of LPA, SLP as
well as review petition, within a period of
three months from the date of receipt of
against any order passedby the aforesaid
authority, they shall be at liberty to have
recourse to the other
118 CWP 18819/15 Sarita Jain Reg.Grant Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed
08-09-2015 30-09-2015 10-10-2015 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell College Permission for D.Ed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to
Education Course
decide the above issues within a period of
v/s
State & Ors. 10 days from from the date of receipt of
certified copy of the order. Needless to say
that in case the relief is to be denied, the
order should contain reasons.
03-01-2019 Page 49 of 135

119 CWP 19036/17 Kuldeep Singh & Reg.Selection Grade Hence, without making any comment on
24-08-2017 08-09-2017 07-01-2018 Directorate Claim has been accepted
HR(G-I) Ors. the merits of the contentions made in the and DEO,s are being
v/s
petition, it is disposed of with a direction to directed to release the
State & Ors.
the competent authority amongst the benefits.
aforesaid legal notice of the petitioners
(Annexure P-9), dated 25.05.2017,
by passing a speaking order within a
of a certified copy of this order.
Though it is the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioners that the
petitioners' case has never been rejected
till date, if any order has however been
passed by the respondents already
rejecting the petitioners' case and the said
rejection is by a detailed speaking order
giving
reasons for such rejection, then only a
short order need be passed now annexing
therewith the detailed order already
passed (if any).
The judgments of this Court on the issue as
have been cited in the legal notice, would
obviously be looked at by the respondents
to see whether the claim of the petitioners
is genuine or not in terms of such
judgments.
120 CWP 19057/18 Jitender Singh & Reg.Quashing of Keeping in view the letter dated
03-08-2018 24-08-2018 17-08-2018 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell Anr. note 7 of 30.10.2017 (Annexure P-8) and order
v/s endorsement of
passed by this Court in CWP-16549-2017
State & Ors. order dated
1142017 Annexure (Annexure P-15), this petition is being
P2 Vide which Post disposed of by giving direction to
Graduate Teachers respondent No. 2 to immediately allow the
of Mewat Cadre petitioners to join their respective stations
have not been whether they have been transferred vide
allowed to be order dated 26.03.2018 (Annexure P-4)
relieved for joining and this order be complied within a period
the Sanskriti Model of two weeks.
Schools
03-01-2019 Page 50 of 135

121 CWP 19095/15 Babli Reg.Revision of Pay Taking into consideration the facts &
10-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-03-2018 Directorate LPA is being filed.
PEN-II v/s Scale circumstances of the case in hand, this A.G.Haryana raised
State & Ors.
Court is of the view that grant of interest @ some objections in draft
9% per of LPA
annum, on the delayed payment after
expiry of three months from the date of
retirement of the husband of the petitioner
till the actual payment, is legally and
factually justified. Accordingly, this Court
awards an interest @ 9% per annum on
the delayed payment(s) w.e.f. March 01,
2013 to actual date of payment.
Accordingly, respondents are directed to
calculate the interest on the delayed
payments reflected in the aforesaid reply
judgment and disburse the same within a
period of two months thereafter.
Disposed of accordingly.
122 CWP 19151/18 Parmeshwari Reg.Regularization Keeping in view the above and order dated
03-08-2018 16-08-2018 27-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present
Staete & ors.
writ petition is disposed of and respondents
are
directed to look into the legal notice dated
25.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass
appropriate orders within a period of 6
weeks from the date of receipt of this order
in accordance with law.
123 CWP 19181/18 Krishna Devi Reg.Regularization Keeping in view the above and order dated
03-08-2018 16-08-2018 27-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present
State & Ors.
writ petition is disposed of and respondents
are
directed to look into the legal notice dated
appropriate orders within a period of 6
weeks from the date of receipt of this order
in accordance with law.
03-01-2019 Page 51 of 135

124 CWP 19186/17 Ajit Singh & Ors. Reg.Upgraded grade After hearing the learned counsel for the
25-08-2017 13-09-2017 Directorate
PGT-III v/s pay or pay scale petitioners and noticing the grievance as
State & Ors. w.e.f the date of
expressed in the petition, we are of the
anomaly of revision
of scales i.e. considered view that this petition needs to
01.01.06 be disposed of at this stage
with a direction to the respondents to
consider and decide the claim of the
petitioners as contained in the legal notice
dated 25.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) by
passing a speaking order as expeditiously
as
possible. Ordered accordingly.
125 CWP 19437/10 Usha Sabharwal Reg.Reinstate with Learned State counsel has also raised an
20-02-2017 17-03-2017 Directorate Draft of LPA has been
HR(AS) v/s all consequential argument that under the subsequent 2008 prepared by the branch
State & Ors. benefits including
Rules, the cadre of Craft Teacher (Tailoring which will be filed
arrears of salary
& Cutting) had been declared as a dying shortly
with 12% interest
from date due till cadre and no fresh appointment is being
the date of payment. made in that cadre.
In my opinion, the adjustment of the
petitioner in terms of Sub Rule 3 of Rule 59
of the Higher Education Rules 2003 would
not amount to
reviving the cadre.
Consequently, the present petition is
disposed of in the same terms as passed in
that judgment (Annexure A-1).
126 CWP 19459/18 Moman Ran Reg.ACP Instant petition is disposed of with a
06-08-2018 24-08-2018 23-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Kaushik & Anr. direction to respondent No.3- Director,
v/s
Department of Secondary Education,
State & Ors.
Haryana, Shiksha Bhawan,
Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the
legal notice (P-8) and to take a conscious
decision, within a period of three
copy of this order..
However, if the petitioners still feels
aggrieved against any of the order(s)
passed by the concerned authority, they
shall be at liberty to have recourse to the
03-01-2019 Page 52 of 135
127 CWP 19561/18 Zile Singh Reg.Promotion for At this stage, the present petition is
08-08-2018 31-08-2018 02-03-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s the post of disposed of by giving direction to the
State & Ors. Headmaster High
respondent No.2 to look into
School
(Annexure P-6)
and legal notice dated 18.05.2018
(Annexure P-7) and pass appropriate
orders in accordance with law, within a
period of six months from the date of
128 CWP 19736/16 Brahma Nand & Reg.Quashing the Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly
03-11-2016 28-11-2016 27-03-2017 Directorate File is being put up
Coordination Ors. impugned Note-III points out that identical issue arose for
v/s of Appendix-B
consideration before this Court in CWP
State & Ors. (Annexure P-I)
dated 11.04.12 and No.22554 of 2016 titled as Lakhbir Singh
in consequence the and others vs State of Haryana and
substituted another,decided on 27.10.2016.
provision of The instant writ petition is also disposed of
corrigendum dt. in the same terms.
01.09.16 (Annexure
P-8) being ultra
vires to Article 14 of
the constitution of
India and being
unjustified,
arbitrary and
having no nexus
with the ultimate
object to be
achieved amounting
to bad effect of birth
marks throughout
the life of a
candidate
03-01-2019 Page 53 of 135

129 CWP 19926/16 Kuldeep & Ors. Reg.Appointment Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly
03-11-2016 14-12-2016 13-03-2016 Directorate
Coordination v/s for the post of PGT points out that identical issue arose for
State & Ors.
consideration before this Court in CWP
No.22554 of
2016 titled as Lakhbir Singh and others vs
State of Haryana and another, decided on
27.10.2016.
The instant writ petition is also disposed of
in the same terms.
CWP No.22554 of 2016 ORDER
In our considered view, unless the rule is

found to be inconsistent with any
Constitutional provisions or a Statute or
against public policy, it would not be
expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with
it and assume the role of Rule Making
Authority. The amendment, substitution or
streamlining of the existing provisions,
essentially falls within the purview of Rule
Making Authority. It is thus not necessary
to express any views on merits, rather we
deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ
petition with a direction to respondent
No.1 to entertain this petition as a
representation on
behalf of the petitioners and consider their
grievance in accordance with the State
policy. It shall be appreciated if an
appropriate decision is taken within a
receiving a certified copy of this order. The
petitioner shall be required to send a copy
of the writ petition alongwith certified
copy of this order to respondent No.1.
03-01-2019 Page 54 of 135

130 CWP 19928/11 Mohammad Reg.Grant all Keeping in mind the entire factual matrix,
03-03-2015 13-04-2015 12-07-2015 Directorate SLP filed by the
HR(AS) Farooque consequential in my opinion the appropriate punishment department nd also by
v/s benefits
for the petitioner would be compulsory the petitioner's
State & Ors.
retirement. Mohamad Farooque SLP
In the circumstances, it is directed that the CC No.8132/16
petitioner would stand compulsorily Mohamad Farooque Vs.
State of Haryana.
retired w.e.f. 10.11.2006. The respondents
Vakalatnama & Affidavit
are directed to compute and pay all his submitted in the
remaining benefits within a period of 3 Haryana Legal Cell on
months from the date of receipt of a 06.06.16 by hand.SLP
certified copy of this order, failing which, fixed for hearing on
the petitioner will be entitled to claim the 25.07.17
same with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date
of entitlement viz. 10.11.2006 till the
date/s of payment/s.
Petition stands disposed of in the above
terms.
131 CWP 20064/18 Rajender Reg.Promotion for Keeping in view the order dated
13-08-2018 31-08-2018 30-12-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) Parshad & Ors. the post of 26.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) this petition is
v/s Headmaster High
being disposed by giving direction to the
State & Ors. School from ESHM
respondents to pass speaking orders on the
representations made by the petitioners
(Annexues-P-8) within four months from
the date of receipt of certified copy of the
order.
03-01-2019 Page 55 of 135

132 CWP 20379/17 Kuldeep Singh Reg.Promotion for Accordingly, without commenting upon the
08-09-2017 26-09-2017 25-01-2018 Directorate
PGT-III v/s the post of PGT merits of the case and keeping in view the
State & Ors. Mathematics
above, the present writ petition is disposed
of with
a direction to respondent no.2 to take into
consideration the grievance raised in the
said representation dated 21.2.2017
(Annexure P/6) and pass an appropriate
order within a period of four months from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
order. In case any adverse order is to be
passed then a reasoned order be passed by
the said respondent and copy thereof be
supplied to the petitioner.
The present writ petition is disposed off
with the aforesaid directions.
03-01-2019 Page 56 of 135

133 CWP 20457/15 Arya Education Reg.Reversion from Insofar as compulsory retirement and
10-05-2017 08-06-2017 09-08-2017 Directorate LPA filed by the
HR(AS) Society (Regd.) the post of order of reversion decided by the appellate Management
v/s Headmaster to the
authority vide order dated 02.09.2015 is
State & Ors. post of Science
Master concerned,
order dated 02.09.2015 is set aside. Insofar
as order of compulsory retirement dated
09.06.2012 issue is concerned, matter is
remanded to the appellate authority –
Director, Secondary Education, Haryana
for deciding
the appeal of 4th respondent and
cross-appeal of the petitioner afresh. The
appellate authority is directed to decide
the appeal as well as cross-appeal within a
period of three months from today. Order
of reversion dated 06.06.2011 is set aside.
The petitioner is at liberty to take fresh
steps if it is warranted by issuing
appropriate notice furnishing the details
and reasons for reverting respondent No.4.
Respondent No.4 is entitled for difference
of
pay during the intervening period from
06.06.2011 till passing final order of
reversion, if any. Arrears of pay shall be
calculated and disbursed to 4th
respondents within a period of three
months from today.
7. Accordingly, instant writ petition stands
allowed.
134 CWP 2059/18 Jai Parkash & Reg.Ante dated That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
01-02-2018 05-03-2018 04-06-2018 Directorate Compliance to be made
HR(G-I) Anr. promotion this stage, only with a direction to the by HRG-II branch, report
v/s
respondents to consider and decide the still awaited
State & Ors.
claim of the petitioners, as also the legal
notice dated 01.11.2017 (Annexure P7)
receipt of certified copy of this order. And
pass appropriate orders in accordance
with law. In the event, the claim of the
petitioners is declined, the authority shall
pass a comprehensive order assigning
03-01-2019 Page 57 of 135
135 CWP 20637/15 Shakuntala Devi Reg.Extension in Applying the ratio of the above mentioned
19-07-2018 08-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-III v/s Service judgments to the facts of the present case,
State & Ors.
the present writ petition stands allowed. A
direction is given to the respondents to
take the date of retirement of the
petitioner as 30.09.2017 and she is entitled
to consequential benefits alongwith 6%
interest.
136 CWP 20666/18 Sushil Punia Reg.Correction in this petition, at this stage is being disposed
18-08-2018 11-09-2018 23-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s Lecturer Seniority of by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors. List for the purpose
pass a speaking order on the Sugam
of promotion to the
post of Principal Sampark Ticket (Aneexure P-3) within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt
of certified copy of this order
137 CWP 20725/18 Mamo Devi Reg.Count previous Without expressing any opinion on the
20-08-2018 11-09-2018 10-12-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s service for the merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors. purpose of
pensionary benefits
respondent(s) to look into the
her legal notice (P-4) and to deal with and
dispose of the same, in accordance with
law within a period of three months from
order. If the concerned authority
comes to the conclusion that petitioner is
entitled to the benefits claimed, to release
the same within a period of next 45 days.
The claim with regard to interest on
delayed payment of retiral benefits to the
petitioner shall also be considered in view
of the observations
made by Full Bench of this Court in case
captioned as “R.S. Randhawa vs. State of
Punjab, 1997 (3) RSJ 318 as well as Govt. of
Haryana Instructions
No.1/2(152)01-2FRII, dated 20.02.2002.
However, if the petitioner still feels
aggrieved against any of the order passed
by the concerned authority, she shall be at
liberty to approach this
Court as well as to have recourse to the
other remedies available under law.
03-01-2019 Page 58 of 135
138 CWP 20757/18 Dr.Shayam Reg.Seniority In view of the said fact, this petition is
20-08-2018 28-09-2018 27-03-2019 Directorate
PGT-II Sunder Ahuja disposed of by giving direction to the
v/s
respondents, especially resondent
State & Ors.
No.2-Director, SecondaryvEducation,
Haryana to look into the representation
dated 29.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) and pass
appropriate orders keeping in view the
seniority list (Annexure P-2), in accordance
with law, within a period of six months
this order.
139 CWP 20802/18 Raj Kumar Reg.Refix and revise Without expressing any opinion on the
20-08-2018 12-09-2018 11-12-2018 Directorate
PGT-II (Retd.Lecturer) the pension of by merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s taking into account
State & Ors. the total service
rendered by the respondent No.2-Director, Secondary
petitioner i.e. 34 Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector
years 2 months and 5, Panchkula, District Panchkula to
6 days consider the claim of the petitioner put
forth by him in legal notice
(P-1) and to take a conscious decision,
order.
by the concerned authority, he shall be at
03-01-2019 Page 59 of 135

140 CWP 20857/13 Narender Kumar Reg.Consider for the Resultantly, the petition is allowed and the
01-05-2017 08-09-2017 07-12-2017 Directorate
Coordination v/s post of PGT Physics respondents are directed to consider the
State & Ors.
claim of the petitioner for appointment to
the post of
PGT Physics after giving him the benefit of
4 years teaching experience and one time
exemption of HTET examination. Let the
necessary exercise be
completed within a period of 3 months
of this order.
pending Civil Misc.Application, if any, also
stands disposed of.
141 CWP 2095/18 Deshraj Reg.Pay fixation as This petition is disposed of in the same
12-01-2018 15-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s per revised pay terms as by the Division Bench in CWP
State & Ors.
No.22764 of 2017 titled Sushil Kumar and
others v. State of Haryana. The decision be
taken within a reasonable time.
142 CWP 21010/18 Rohta Kumar Reg.Promotion for That being so, the petition is disposed of, in
21-08-2018 21-08-2018 16-11-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s the post of terms of the decision of this Court in
State & Ors. Headmaster
Dharampal (supra). Respondent No. 2 will
consider and pass appropriate orders on
the representation dated 03.07.2018
(P-6) in accordance with law, within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt
of certified copy of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 60 of 135

143 CWP 21110/17 Geeta Reg.Consider for the Accordingly, without commenting on the
25-09-2017 06-11-2017 05-01-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Sanskrit merits of the case or the entitlement of the
State & Ors.
petitioner for the above said relief and
keeping in view
the fact that the matter is still pending
consideration, the present writ petition is
disposed. A direction is issued to
respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the
P-9) after taking into consideration the
show cause notice dated 04.09.2015
(Annexure P-7) and the reply dated
26.09.2015 (Annexure P-8) filed by the
petitioner and the justification given by the
school also regarding the same if not
already
done. The said exercise shall be completed
within a period of 2 months from the date
of receipt of certified copy of the order. In
case any adverse order is to be passed, the
petitioner be given personal hearing before
passing of the said order. If decision has
already been taken, then copy be supplied
to the petitioner.
144 CWP 21254/17 Meenakshi & Reg.Step up of pay Consequently, these petitions are allowed
30-10-2017 11-12-2017 10-04-2018 Directorate
PGT-III Ors. scales in the same terms as Neelam Ranis' case
v/s
(supra), with the competent authority
State & Ors.
amongst the respondents directed to
consider the case of each of the petitioners
for stepping up their pay scales to the level
of their juniors, as per the ratio of the
aforesaid judgment, and to pass a speaking
order thereafter. The speaking order shall
be passed in the case of each
petitioner/identical set of petitioners
within a period of 4 months from the date
of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 61 of 135

145 CWP 2129/17 Rakesh Kumar & Reg.HTET Before parting with the judgment, it is
02-05-2017 11-08-2017 Directorate
Coordination Ors. clarified that this order cannot be held to
v/s
benefit only those persons who had
State & Ors.
approached this Court,
but it would also have to go to all those
other candidates who had applied for the
posts but have not approached this Court.
Consequently, the
respondents are directed to issue a public
notice informing all such applicants who
had passed the STET examination and had
cleared the written test for the posts in
question and had not approached this
Court, but are otherwise similarly situated
as petitioners, that they are now
considered
to be eligible and then consider their
claims also.
Since the main cases have been decided,
the pending Civil Misc. Application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
146 CWP 21362/16 Manisha Bhutani Reg.Transfer This petition is disposed of with a direction
17-10-2016 22-12-2016 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect.in Physics) to the competent authority amongst the
v/s
State & Ors.
representation of the petitioner without
delay and the petitioner thereafter be
informed
accordingly.
147 CWP 21390/15 Dalbir Singh & Reg.Promotion For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II Ors. date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s
State & Ors.
03-01-2019 Page 62 of 135

148 CWP 21621/18 Mangtu Ram & Reg.Grant of revised Without expressing any opinion on the
28-08-2018 13-09-2018 12-12-2018 Directorate
PGT-III Ors. pay by restoring the merits of the case, instant petition is
(Lect.Pol.Sci.) deductions made
v/s from the payment of
State & Ors. additional Dearness respondent No.2-Director, Education
Allowances Department Haryana, Sector 5, Panchkula
w.e.f.01.05.73 to consider the claim of the petitioners put
onwards alongwith forth by them in representation (P-7) and
arrear to take a conscious decision in the light of
judgments referred to above in para No.1
of this judgment, within a period of three
copy of this order.
However, if the petitioners still feel
by the concerned authority, they shall be at
149 CWP 21693/18 Ishwar Singh Reg.Grant the In view of the above, without adverting to
01-10-2018 17-10-2018 28-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Pilania & Ors. benefit of Selection the merits of the case, the present petition
v/s Grade
is disposed of with a direction to
State & Ors.
respondent No.1-
Additional Chief Secretary, Government of
Haryana, Department of School Education,
Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to
consider and decide the legal notice dated
13.04.2018 (Annexure P-10) in the light of
Annexures P- 2, P-3 and P-4 within six
weeks from the receipt of the certified copy
of the order. In case, on consideration, the
competent authority reaches to the
conclusion that the benefit claimed by the
petitioners is admissible to them,in such
eventuality, the consequential relief be
allowed to them, within a period of six
weeks thereafter. However, in case the
competent authority feels that the relief
claimed by the petitioners is not admissible
or made out,in that case, a speaking order
be passed in the matter.
03-01-2019 Page 63 of 135

150 CWP 21734/12 Sandeep Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
State & Ors. Lect.Physical
Education
passed in CWP
Haryana
151 CWP 21807/17 Anita Reg.HTET Accordingly, without commenting on the
25-09-2017 12-01-2018 09-02-2018 Directorate
Coordination v/s merits of the case or the entitlement of the
state & Ors.
petitioner for the abovesaid relief and
keeping in view the fact that the matter is
still pending consideration, the present
writ petition is disposed of with direction
to respondent-Commission to take a
decision on the representation dated
21.08.2017 (Annexure P-7) and declare the
result of the petitioner. In case the
petitioner is found successful and falls
within the zone of consideration for
appointment, necessary steps will be taken
to send a recommendation to the State
Government for
appointment. The said exercise shall be
done within a period of 4 weeks from the
date of receipt of certified copy of the
order. In case the petitioner does not fall
within the zone of consideration, the
Commission will inform the petitioner.
03-01-2019 Page 64 of 135

152 CWP 21829/18 Kanta Rani Reg.Ante dated Instant petition is disposed of with a
06-09-2018 12-10-2018 11-01-2019 Directorate
PGT-II v/s promotion direction to respondent No.2 to look into
State & Ors.
the legal notice dated
decision by passing a speaking order in
accordance with law, rules, regulations
and instructions issued by the
Government from time to time, within a
period of three months from the date of
In case, petitioner still feels aggrieved by
any of the order(s) passed by the aforesaid
authority, he shall be at liberty to have
recourse to the remedies
available under law and/or to approach
this Court.
153 CWP 21895/18 Raj Pal Singh & Reg.Selection Grade In view of the above, this writ petition is
30-08-2018 13-09-2018 12-11-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. disposed of by giving directions to the
v/s
respondents to look into the legal notice of
State & Ors.
the petitioner and pass speaking orders
within a period of two months from the
date of receipt of the copy of this order.
154 CWP 21956/13 Pawan Kumar Reg.Promotion to Since penalty of punishment imposed upon
04-02-2016 18-04-2016 03-05-2016 Directorate LPA filed and same is
HR(G-I) v/s the post of Principal the petitioner was not major (it was a allowed on 12.09.17 and
State & Ors. w.e.f.18.08.06
minor), order dated 02.07.2012 decision came in favour
instead of 01.01.10
(AnnexureP/7) is set aside and the of department
petitioner is directed to be promoted
notionally w.e.f. 18.08.2006 and a direction
is also being given to the respondents to fix
his notional pay w.e.f. 18.08.2006 for all
intents
and purposes within a period of three
months.
Petition is allowed, accordingly.
03-01-2019 Page 65 of 135

155 CWP 22070/17 Rohtash Kumar Reg.Regularize the Consequently, without making any
27-09-2017 07-11-2017 10-02-2018 Directorate 13/232-17ME(3)
HRME-I & Ors. services of the comment whatsoever on the merit of the
v/s petitioners from the
contentions raised by the petitioners, this
State & Ors. date juniors to the
petitioners have petition is disposed of
been regularized i.e. with a direction to the competent
19.08.14 and to authority amongst the respondents to take
release all a decision on the legal notice of the
consequential petitioners (Annexure P-7), dated
benefits arising out 25.06.2017, by passing a speaking order
of it. within a period of 3 months from the date
156 CWP 22095/14 Amit Bindra & Reg.Deemed The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I Ors. university matter judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s for appointment of
State & Ors. PGT Mathematics
passed in CWP
Haryana
157 CWP 22168/14 Tarun Kaushik Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. A.G.Haryana raised
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and some objections in draft
others Vs. State of Haryana and another of LPA
decided on 27.5.2015.
Deemed University
Matter
The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
Haryana
158 CWP 22199/15 Anu Gupta & Ors. Reg.Submission of For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II v/s cases regarding date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
State & Ors. promotion of
Masters/Mistresses
and C&V Teachers
to different subject
lecturer cadre
03-01-2019 Page 66 of 135

159 CWP 2223/17 Karan Pal & Ors. Reg.Grant Selection Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem
21-03-2018 04-04-2018 03-08-2018 Directorate Reminder has been
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) grade w.e.f 01.01.96 that the matter in issue is squarely covered issued to DEO Palwal on
v/s instead of
by an order and judgment, dated 21.05.18
State & Ors. 01.04.05/25.03.03
20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP
No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.
State of Haryana and others). And,
therefore, the petition at hands be disposed
of in the same terms.
ORDER IN CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat

Singh Yadav v.State of Haryana and
others).
n the circumstances, the writ petition is

allowed. The respondents are directed to
remove the anomaly and to grant the
petitioner the grade w.e.f. 1.1.1996 instead
of 01.08.2000. The actual benefits will,
however, be granted to the petitioner for a
period of 38 months since the filing of the
first writ petition i.e. 17.09.2015.
Let necessary exercise of granting him the
arrears be made within four months from
order, failing which the petitioner would
be entitled to interest also @ 12% p.a. from
the date the amount fell due
160 CWP 22375/15 Hem chander Reg.Recovery Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
13-08-2018 17-09-2018 16-11-2018 Directorate Letter written to DEO
PEN-I v/s with a direction to respondents to repay Sonepat for compliance
State & Ors.
the deducted amount to the tune of dt. 20.09.18 & 25.10.18
`69,950/- within a and message given on
period of two months from the date of telephone & through
receipt of certified copy of this order. email also
However, in case of non-compliance of the
order it would entail interest @9% per
annum from the date of passing of order
dated 12.04.2016 (P-16) till actual
payment.
03-01-2019 Page 67 of 135

161 CWP 22417/17 Bhoop Singh & Reg.Pay Fixation Consequently, these petitions are allowed
30-10-2017 30-04-2018 29-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. (Lect.in in the same terms as Neelam Ranis' case
Phy.Education)
(supra), with the competent authority
v/s
State & Ors. amongst the respondents directed to
consider the case of each of the petitioners
for stepping up their pay scales to the level
of their juniors, as per the ratio of the
aforesaid judgment, and to pass a speaking
order thereafter. The speaking order shall
be passed in the case of each
petitioner/identical set of
petitioners within a period of 4 months
of this order.
If the case of each/any petitioner(s) is
found to be covered by the decision in that
case, the arrears of difference of pay be
released to them
within another period of 3 months
thereafter, but with such arrears restricted
to a period of 3 years and 2 months prior
to the date of filing of the petition before
this Court, by each particular petitioner.
On such arrears, the petitioners would also
be entitled to interest @ 6% per annum, as
was granted in Neelam Ranis' case.
6. It needs to be noticed that in Neelam
Ranis' case, it is seen that no restriction of
payment of arrears was ordered, but that
was obviously for
the reason that she had stated that she was
drawing less salary than her juniors from
01.07.2009, with the petition having been
filed in the year 2010 itself, i.e. soon
thereafter, hence there was obviously no
need to restrict the arreras.
. A photocopy of this order be also placed
on the files of the other connected matters.
03-01-2019 Page 68 of 135

162 CWP 22470/14 Ramesh Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I & Ors. post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
163 CWP 22554/16 Lakhbir Shing & Reg.Quashing the In our considered view, unless the rule is
27-10-2016 28-11-2016 27-03-2017 Directorate File is being submitted
Coordination Ors. impugned Note-III found to be inconsistent with any
v/s of Appendix-B
Constitutional provisions or a Statute or
State & Ors. (Annexure P-I)
dated 11.04.12 and against public policy, it would not be
in consequence the expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with
substituted it and assume the role of Rule Making
provision of Authority. The amendment, substitution or
corrigendum dt. streamlining of the existing provisions,
01.09.16 (Annexure essentially falls within the purview of Rule
P-8) being ultra Making Authority. It is thus not necessary
vires to Article 14 of to express any views on merits, rather we
the constitution of
India and being
unjustified,
arbitrary and No.1 to entertain this petition as a
having no nexus representation on
with the ultimate behalf of the petitioners and consider their
object to be grievance in accordance with the State
achieved amounting policy. It shall be appreciated if an
to bad effect of birth appropriate decision is taken within a
marks throughout period of four months from the date of
the life of a receiving a certified copy of this order. The
candidate
petitioner shall be required to send a copy
03-01-2019 Page 69 of 135

164 CWP 22589/18 Sneh Lata & Anr Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
06-09-2018 11-10-2018 10-01-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV v/s benefit of Selection merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors. Grade
No.2-The Director,
Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the
a speaking order particularly
in view of judgment rendered by this Court
in CWP No. 9347 of 2016, titled as Jagat
Singh Yadav vs. State of Haryana and
others; decided on 20.02.2017 (P-8) which
as per the submission made by learned
counsel for the petitioners has
attained finality, within a period of three
they shall be at liberty to approach
this Court.
165 CWP 22593/18 Hari Singh & Ors. Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
21-08-2018 14-09-2018 26-10-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service merits of the case,instant petition is
State & Ors.
to pass appropriate orders in favour of the
petitioners on the representation dated
21.03.2018 (P-7), keeping in view CWP No.
18296-2014. . This exercise shall be
completed within a period of six weeks
this order. The State after doing the
needful shall inform this Court as well.
03-01-2019 Page 70 of 135

166 CWP 22653/14 Surender Kumar Reg.Appointment/P The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I & Ors. ost Graduate from judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s deemed universities
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
167 CWP 22737/16 Zakir Hussain Reg.Consider for the In our considered view, unless the rule is
04-11-2016 20-02-2017 19-06-2017 Directorate
Coordination v/s post of PGT History found to be inconsistent with any
State & Ors.
Constitutional provision or a Statute or it is
against the public policy, it would not be
expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with
it and assume the role of Rule Making
Authority. The amendment, substitution or
streamlining of the existing provisions thus
is an exercise which essentially falls within
the purview of the Rule Making Authority.
It is not necessary for this Court to express
any views on merits, rather it would be
appropriate to dispose of this writ petition
with a direction to respondent No.1 to
entertain this petition as a representation
on behalf of the petitioner and consider his
grievances in accordance with the law. It
shall be appreciated if an appropriate
decision is taken within a period of four
certified copy of this order. The petitioner
shall be required to send a copy of the writ
petition alongwith certified copy of this
order to respondent No.1.
168 CWP 22764/17 Sushil Kumar & Reg.Fixation of their After hearing learned counsel for the
06-10-2017 27-10-2017 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. pay in revised pay petitioners, we dispose of the instant
v/s scales
petition with a direction to the respondents
State & Ors. and grant of arrears
on account of it, to consider and decide the legal notice
(Annexure P-7) submitted by the
petitioners as expeditiously as possible.
03-01-2019 Page 71 of 135

169 COCP 228/17 Ishwar Singh Reg.Revise the After hearing learned counsel for the
01-11-2017 05-12-2017 04-03-2018 Directorate
IN cwp v/s pension and parties and on perusal of various orders
nO.7684/15 Sh.P.K.Dass, IAS pensionary benefits
and the stand taken in the written
PEN-II after computing the
service w.e.f statement, it would be in the interest of
18.01.88 to 31.10.11 justice that in case the petitioner makes a
detail representation to the competent
authority i.e. the Managing Committee
preferably within a period of one month
from today, it is expected that the
Managing Committee shall consider the
same preferably within a period of two
months
thereafter.
The contempt petition is disposed of
accordingly.
In case the petitioner is still aggrieved in
any manner, he is at liberty to avail the
appropriate remedy.
170 CWP 22879/16 Narender Singh Reg.Transfer Without making any observation on the
07-11-2016 15-12-2016 06-01-2017 Directorate
PGT-II (Lect in merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to
Geography)
dispose of this petition with a direction to
v/s
State & Ors. the
respondents No.3 to 5 to consider and
decide the legal notice dated (Annexure
P5) within a period of two months in
The petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
171 CWP 23112/18 Jagdish Chander Reg.Regularization At this stage, present petition is disposed of
04-10-2018 31-10-2018 28-11-2018 Directorate
HRME-II v/s of Service by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors.
look into the legal notice dated 16.05.2018
orders in accordance with law, within a
period of four weeks from the date of
receipt of certified copy of this order. In
case,
the petitioner is found eligible, his services
be regularized with all consequential
benefits at par with his juniors.
03-01-2019 Page 72 of 135

172 CWP 2316/18 Ramesh Kumar Reg.Grant the house That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
02-02-2018 16-05-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
PGT-III & Ors. rent allowances this stage, only with a direction to the
(Lect.inPol.Scien monthly without
ce) computing @10% of
v/s basic pay of claim of the petitioners as also their
State & Ors. petitioners and representation, dated 17.11.2017
overlooking the (Annexure P-4), within a period of three
statutory provision months from the receipt of a certified copy
of notification of this order. And, pass appropriate orders
2/10/2013-4FR/16 in accordance with law. In the event, the
69 dated claim of the petitioners is declined, the
19.07.2016 authority shall pass a comprehensive
order assigning reasons in support thereof.
173 CWP 23296/16 Indu Rani Reg.Transfer Without making any observation on the
10-11-2016 16-01-2017 15-04-2017 Directorate
PGT-III v/s merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to
State & Ors.
dispose of this petition with direction to
respondent No.2 to
consider and decide representation of the
petitioner dated 23.9.2016 (Annexure P-9),
in accordance with law, within a period of
The petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
174 CWP 23313/18 Kaiash Chand Reg.Revised Pay Without expressing any opinion on the
18-09-2018 25-10-2018 24-02-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV Sharma & Ors. Scale merits of the case,instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors.
to look into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioners in the legal notice dated
decision in accordance with law, rules and
regulations, particularly in view of the
judgments referred to
above in para 1 of this order, within a
However, in case petitioners still feel
aggrieved by any order of the afore-said
authorities, they shall be at liberty to have
under law as well as to approach this
Court.
03-01-2019 Page 73 of 135

175 CWP 23600/17 Ram Bhagat Reg.Count previous Accordingly, without commenting upon the
10-11-2017 28-11-2017 27-01-2018 Directorate Letter issued to DEO
PGT-II (Lect.in.History) service as clerk for merits of the case or the entitlement of the Jhajjar for sending case
v/s the purpose of
petitioner, as such, keeping in view the
State & Ors. pensionary benefits
above and the fact that
the necessary order would have to be
passed by the competent authority. The
(Annexure P-7) has been addressed to the
erstwhile employer and not to respondents
No.1 & 2, with whom the petitioner has
been re-employed, therefore, the present
writ petition is disposed of, with a direction
to the competent authority to treat the
writ petition as representation and decide
the said issue as to the petitioner's
entitlement to be treated under the
Old Pension Scheme, as prayed for. Let
necessary decision be taken within a period
of 2 months from the receipt of a certified
copy of this order. If the benefit is to be
denied, the same should contain reasons
and be conveyed to the
petitioner, forthwith.
176 CWP 23660/16 Tabassum Reg.Appointment In view of the above factual position, the
18-09-2018 29-10-2018 30-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT writ petition stands allowed and direction
State & Ors. Urdu
is given to respondents to consider the
petitioner eligible
for selection under Category No 18
(Haryana Cadre) and category No. 34 (For
Mewat District), in view of notification
dated 22.03.2018 (Annexure P-11 and
P-12). This exercise shall be completed
within a period of four weeks.
03-01-2019 Page 74 of 135

177 CWP 23686/17 Mange Ram Reg.Transfer Accordingly, without commenting on the
13-10-2017 27-10-2017 08-12-2017 Directorate 13/229-17 ME(4)
HRME-I v/s merits of the case or the entitlement of the As per A.G opinion it is
State & Ors.
petitioner for the above said relief and not fit case for filing LPA.
keeping in view the fact that the matter is File put up to Higher
still pending consideration, the present Authority for orders
writ petition is disposed of with a direction
to respondent no. 2 that he shall
sympathetically consider the request of the
petitioner in view of the averments which
have been recorded above. Accordingly, a
decision on the representation dated
20.07.2017 (Annexure P-10) will be taken
within a period of 6 weeks from the date of
receipt of certified copy of the order and
keeping in mind the fact that the transfer
had been cancelled 2-1/2 months later and
in normal circumstances, an employee is
entitled to stay for a period of at least 2
years as per the policy of the State itself.
178 CWP 23846/18 Kuldeep Singh Reg.Grant the In the circumstances, the writ petition is
24-09-2018 18-10-2018 17-02-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV v/s benefit of Selection allowed. The respondents are directed to
State & Ors. Grade
remove the anomaly and to grant the
petitioner the grade w.e.f. 1.1.1996 instead
of 01.08.2000. The actual benefits will,
however, be granted to the petitioner for a
period of 38 months since the filing of the
first writ petition i.e. 17.09.2015. Let
necessary exercise of granting him the
arrears be made within four months from
order, failing which the petitioner would
be entitled to interest also @ 12% p.a. from
the date of amount fell due.
03-01-2019 Page 75 of 135

179 CWP 24015/18 Shiv Kumar Reg.Transfer Without commenting upon the merits of
19-09-2018 17-10-2018 14-11-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Dhiman & Ors. the case, the present writ petition is
v/s
disposed of by giving directions to the
State & Ors.
respondents to look into their
representations dated 06.09.2017 and
09.09.2017 (Annexure P-2) and decide the
same in view of the judgment referred
above, within a period of 4
weeks from the date of certified copy of this
order.
180 CWP 24122/18 Mushtaque Reg.Grant of Higher Without expressing any opinion on the
20-09-2018 14-11-2018 13-02-2019 Directorate
CCA Ahemed pay scale and grant merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s of pensionary
disposed of with direction to respondent
State & Ors. benefits
No.2-Director Secondary Education
Haryana, Panchkula to look into the
legal notice (P-5) and to take a conscious
decision, within a period
of three months from the date of receipt of
a certified copy of this order.
approach this Court or
available under law.
181 CWP 24252/17 Mukesh Kumar Reg.Fix the pay in Consequently, this petition is disposed of
27-10-2017 09-11-2017 08-02-2018 Directorate File is sent to the Audit
HR(G-I) v/s the revised pay with a direction to the competent Cell for opinion
State & Ors. scale of
authority amongst the respondents to
Rs.1640-2900
instead of consider the case of the petitioner in the
1400-2600 light of the aforesaid judgments, as also the
w.e.f.22.12.98 and order of the Director Secondary Education
Rs.2000-3500 dated 18.10.2016, Annexure P-7, by passing
w.e.f.01.05.90 as a speaking order, within a period of 3
well as in the months from the date of receipt of a
corresponding certified copy of this order.
revised pay scale
w.e.f. 01.01.96 and
01.01.06
03-01-2019 Page 76 of 135

182 CWP 24319/13 Ram Charan Reg.Arrear of Keeping in view the prayer made in the
PEN-II Sharma Revised Pension petition, the present petition is allowed CM No.11117/15 and
v/s
State & Ors.
of the petitioner, in terms of judgment in Court granted stay stay
LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of till the decision of SLP
No.38930/15
Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and
others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing
a speaking order, within a period of four
14.05.2015
183 CWP 24357/18 Prem Chand Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
24-09-2018 17-10-2018 16-01-2019 Directorate
PEN-II v/s benefit of revised merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors. pension
No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
by the petitioner in the legal notice dated
decision in accordance with law, rules and
regulations,
particularly in view of the judgments
referred in the legal notice, within a period
authority, he shall be at liberty to have
recourse to other remedies
available under law including to approach
this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 77 of 135

184 CWP 24361/18 Attar Singh & Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
24-09-2018 15-11-2018 14-02-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) Ors. Selection Grade merits of the case instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors.
No.3 or any other competent officer to deal
with the matter, to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in their
representation dated 10.11.2017 (P-10)
and to take a conscious decision in
accordance with law, rules and
regulations, particularly in view of the
judgment referred in para 1 of this order,
date of receipt of certified copy of his order.
authorities, they shall at liberty to have
recourse to other remedies available under
law including to approach this Court.
185 CWP 24479/11 Subhash Reg.Pensionary Keeping in view the prayer made in the
PEN-II Chander, Benefits petition, the present petition is allowed CM No.11117/15 and
Retd.SSM from
Hindu
Sr.Sec.School,
of the petitioner, in terms of judgment in Court granted stay stay
Kaithal
LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of till the decision of SLP
v/s
No.38930/15
State & Ors. Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and
others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing
a speaking order, within a period of four
03-01-2019 Page 78 of 135

186 CWP 24617/18 Subhash & Ors. Reg.Arrear of pay Accordingly, the present writ petition is
26-09-2018 17-10-2018 16-04-2019 Directorate
HRME-I v/s disposed of with a direction to consider
State & Ors.
and decide the legal notice dated
18.06.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass a
speaking and reasoned order in view of the
judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in
CWP No.27304 of 2013 on 01.10.2015
(Annexure
P-6) within a period of 6 months from the
date of receipt of the certified copy of this
order. However, if the claim of the
petitioners is found valid and genuine then
they be granted necessary benefits as
claimed in the petition w.e.f. 01.04.2010
with all consequential benefits.
187 CWP 24634/17 Niranjan Singh Reg.Count the Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
31-10-2017 28-11-2017 27-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Shishodia service rendered in with a direction to respondents to look into
(Lect.in private aided school
Economics) since 16.08.76 to
v/s 10.01.83 before the representations (P-4 & P-5) and to take
State & Ors. joining in the a conscious decision in accordance with
department of law within a period of three months from
education in Govt.of the date of receipt of certified copy of
haryana for the this order. However, if the petitioner still
purpose of feels aggrieved by any order of the
pensionary benefits afore-said authorities, he shall be at liberty
to approach this Court.
03-01-2019 Page 79 of 135

188 CWP 24730/17 Sonia Rani Reg.Consider for the Keeping in view the above, this Court is of
01-11-2017 06-12-2017 16-12-2017 Directorate It is not fit case for filing
PGT-I v/s post of PGT the opinion that since the petitioner has LPA as per opinion of A.G
State & Ors. Mathematic
been declared qualified at a subsequent
point of time and as
per the terms of the advertisement, has
become eligible. In case the interview
process has not been completed for the
above-said posts, it would be appropriate
that respondent No.2 will take a decision
on the representation dated 23.10.2017
(Annexure P-9) within 10 days from the
In case the petitioner is not to be permitted
to appear in the interview process, she
shall be communicated reasons for the
same.
Writ petition stands disposed of in the
above-said terms.
189 CWP 24757/13 Bal Rishi Reg.Appointment The writ petition is allowed in view of the
State & Ors. Lecturer English
passed in CWP
Haryana
190 CWP 24788/18 Rajender Singh Reg.Grant the Without expressing any opinion on the
27-09-2018 17-10-2018 16-02-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV Hooda & Ors. benefit of Selection merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s Grade
State & Ors.
decide the legal notice dated 13.04.2018
orders in accordance with law. This
exercise shall be completed within a period
of four months from the date of receipt of
03-01-2019 Page 80 of 135

191 CWP 24859/13 Shiv Kumar & Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I Anr post of PGT Hindi judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. granted stay in LPA
v/s
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and No.1215 of 2015 against
State & Ors.
others Vs. State of Haryana and another the order dt.27.05.15
passed in CWP
Haryana
192 CWP 25035/17 Mrs.Usha Gandhi Reg.Pay Scale of Keeping in view the submission made by
06-11-2017 21-11-2017 20-01-2018 Directorate
Coordination v/s vocational merger learned counsel for the petitioners and
State & Ors. employee in
without commenting anything on the
Education
Department merits of the case, the petition stands
to consider the legal notice dated
12.05.2017(Annexure P-9) and pass
necessary order in accordance with law
and keeping in view the fact that the
similarly situated persons who filed CWP
No.15065 of 2013 have been granted the
same benefits. In case the petitioners are
found entitled for the benefits, the same be
released to them within a period of two
months from date of
receipt of copy of the order.
Disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 81 of 135

193 CWP 25080/18 Jai Bhagwan Reg.Release the Instant petition is disposed of with a
28-09-2018 29-10-2018 28-01-2019 Directorate
HRME-II v/s pension and direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to look
State & Ors. pensionary benefits
into the grievances unfolded by the
after regularizing of
his services petitioner in the legal notice dated
w.e.f.27.01.90/01.0 30.05.2018 (P-12) and to take a conscious
2.99 with all decision by passing a speaking order
consequential considering all the facts narrated in the
benefits as the aforesaid legal notice (P-12), within a
services of juniors period of three months from the date of
to him have been receipt of a certified copy of this order. In
regularized w.e.f. case, competent authorities comes to the
27.01.99
conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the
relief(s) claimed, same be released to him
within a period of next 45 days.
have recourse to the other remedies
this Court.
194 CWP 2531/18 Beer Singh & Reg.Pay Fixation In view of the pendency of the matter
05-02-2018 11-04-2018 Directorate Letter issued to DEO
PGT-II Ors.(Lect.in before the competent authority for Narnaul
Pol.Science)
decision-making, this petition is disposed of
v/s
State & Ors. with a similar direction to the competent
authority amongst the respondents that
legal notice dated 01.04.2017 (Annex P-17)
would be taken up and decided together
with other cases by a uniform decision
taken expeditiously in
writing and conveyed to the stake-holders.
195 CWP 25499/18 Abhey Ram Reg.Antedated In view of above, present writ petition
17-10-2018 29-10-2018 28-01-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s promotion to the stands disposed of with the directions to
State & Ors. post of Headmaster
the respondents to look into legal notice
and to consider his
claim for the dated 23.07.2018 (Annexure P9) and take
promotion to the required action thereon expeditiously and
post of Principal preferably within a period of three months
of this order.
196 CWP 25512/15 Subhash Reg.Promotion For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II chander date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s
State & Ors.
03-01-2019 Page 82 of 135
197 CWP 2553/18 Rajbala & Ors. Reg.Regularization The issue is open for the competent
05-02-2018 21-02-2018 20-05-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service authority to look into in accordance with
State & Ors.
law by passing a speaking order.
Accordingly, the instant petition is
disposed of with a direction to the
legal notice after hearing the petitioners or
their representative/s effectively before
assigning comprehensive reasons upon
which the decision is proposed to be
passed. The decision be taken within three
copy of this order and conveyed to the
petitioners within the same time frame. If
relief is deserved, it may be granted
without the necessity of passing a reasoned
order.
198 CWP 25655/18 Partap Singh & Reg.Regularization This petition is being disposed of by giving
05-10-2018 12-10-2018 Directorate
HRME-II Ors. of Service direction to the respondents to pass
v/s
appropriate orders on the legal notice
State & Ors.
dated 23.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) keeping
in view the judgment passed by this Court
in CWP-14131-2016 Mukesh Kumar and
others V/s. State of Haryana and others
(Annexure P-6), in accordance with law.
03-01-2019 Page 83 of 135

199 CWP 25682/14 Arun Singh & Reg.Issue Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I Ors. Appointment letters the petitioners would be entitled for
v/s of PGT English
State & Ors.
which were never
accommodated. The
200 CWP 2569/18 Satbir Singh & Reg.ACP Without expressing any opinion on the
05-02-2018 19-02-2018 Directorate Write to DEO Hisar on
HRME-II Ors. (L.A) merits of the case, this petition is disposed 18.05.18, 19.06.18,
v/s
of with a direction to the competent 06.09.18, 12.10.18 &
State & Ors.
authority to consider and decide the legal 06.11.18 for compliance
notice of the petitioners within a
reasonable period of three months. The
competent authority would look into the
seniority list of Laboratory Assistants and
other relevant facts and then pass an order
in writing containing the reasons for the
conclusion/s. If the claim of the petitioners
is found fair and justified, no speaking
order is required to be passed and the
petitioners may be promoted from the date
their juniors have
been promoted in accordance with rules.
201 CWP 25713/18 Anil Kumar & Reg.Pay Fixation Without expressing any opinion on the
06-10-2018 17-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-I Ors. merits of the case, this petition is disposed
v/s
of by giving direction to respondent No. 2
State & Ors.
to decide the legal notice dated 25.07.2018
(Annexure P-3) in accordance with law
expeditiously.
03-01-2019 Page 84 of 135

202 CWP 25863/17 Sandoki Reg.Regularization Accordingly, without commenting on the

04-12-2017 13-02-2018 12-05-2018 Directorate 13/20-18ME(3)
HRME-I v/s of Service merits of the case or the entitlement of the
State & Ors.
petitioners for the abovesaid relief and
keeping in view the fact that the matter is
still pending consideration, the present
to the competent authority to take a
decision on the legal notice dated
10.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) within a
of certified copy of the order. In case any
adverse order is to be passed, a reasoned
order be passed and conveyed to the
petitioners
203 CWP 25868/18 Chander Bhan Reg.Grant the At this stage, the present petition is
08-10-2018 15-11-2018 14-05-2019 Directorate
PGT-IV Sharma & Ors. benefit of ist, 2nd & disposed of by giving direction to the
v/s 3rd ACP grade
respondents to look into the legal notice
State & Ors. pay/scale in
relation to the dated 21.08.2017 (Annexure P-5) and pass
modified/upgraded appropriate orders as per Haryana Civil
pay scales on Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, which
completion of 10,20 have been amended thereafter. This
& 30 years if regular exercise be completed within a period of six
service. months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order.
204 CWP 25870/18 Bhajan Lal & Reg.Grant pay parity Since the SLP filed by State of Haryana, has
08-10-2018 25-10-2018 24-12-2018 Directorate
HRME-I Ors. with their junior by now been dismissed, this petition is
v/s giving them
disposed of by giving direction to the
State & Ors. notional
promotion/adjustm respondents to look into the legal notice
ent as LA dated 09.08.2018 (Annexure P-8) and pass
appropriate order in accordance with law,
within a period of two months from the
order.
03-01-2019 Page 85 of 135

205 CWP 25875/15 Anil Kumar & Reg.ACP In these circumstances, the respondents are
30-01-2017 24-03-2017 23-05-2017 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. directed to release the interest on the
v/s
delayed payment of retiral benefits, as per
State & Ors.
government
instructions within two months from the
order.
In view of the above, the present petition
stands disposed of.
206 CWP 26121/17 Joginder Singh Reg.3rd ACP Instant petition is disposed of with a
16-11-2017 30-11-2017 01-03-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV (Lect.Pol.Science direction to respondent(s) to consider the
)
case of the petitioner and take a final
v/s
State & Ors. decision in terms of Rule 7 of Haryana Civil
Service (Assured Career Progression) Rules,
2008 read with letter dated 04.03.2014
(Annexure P-1), within a period of three
copy of this order.
The factum of grant of interest on delayed
payment of retiral benefits shall also be
considered in view of the observations
made by Full Bench of this Court in case
captioned as “R.S. Randhawa vs. State of
Punjab, 1997 (3) RSJ 318.
aggrieved of the order passed by the
207 CWP 26254/16 Suminder Singh Reg.Transfer Without expressing any opinion on the
19-12-2016 28-12-2016 Directorate
PGT-II v/s merits of the case, this petition is disposed
State & Ors.
of with direction to respondents to
consider and decide
the representation (Annex P-5) promptly.
208 CWP 26303/18 Sanjay Kumar & Reg.Petitioners who The present petition is being disposed of
30-10-2018 20-11-2018 13-11-2018 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell Ors. are PGT of Mewat with similar direction as in the judgement
v/s Cadre have not been
of Jitender Singh's case (supra) (Annexure
State & Ors. allowed to be
relieved, for joining P-24) and respondent No. 2 will allow the
the DIET petitioners to join their respective stations,
who have been transferred vide order
dated 23.02.2018 (Annexure P-4) within a
period of two weeks
03-01-2019 Page 86 of 135

209 CWP 26386/14 Jagdish Kumar Reg.Grant the Perusal of the records it is evident that no
21-03-2017 12-04-2017 20-06-2017 Directorate 13/52-15 ME(4)
HRME-I v/s arrear of Promotion reasons have been assigned as to why the LPA is being filed.
State & Ors. as Dy.Sudt.
petitioner's name was over looked for A.G.Haryana raised
promotion to the post of Assistant and some objections in draft
Deputy Superintendent as and when it was of LPA
due.
Therefore, the condition imposed in the
order dated 04.10.2013 (Annexure P-1) to
the extent that the petitioner is entitled to
notional pay fixation with effect from
14.09.2011 is hereby set aside and the
concerned respondent is directed to pay
arrears during the intervening period from
14.09.2011 to
04.10.2013 in the cadre of Deputy
Superintendent and extend petitioner's
difference of pay along with the interest at
the rate 9% per annum and
petitioner is entitled to cost of `10,000/-.
Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within
three months.
210 CWP 26654/15 S.K.Education Reg.Recognition Without commenting upon the arguments
26-08-2016 06-09-2016 05-12-2016 Directorate File put up to fix
HR(PS) Society as such raised by the counsel for the personal hearing before
v/s
petitioner and keeping in view the fact the W.ACSSE
State & Ors.
counsel was not present before the
Appellate Authority, and in view of the
averments made in Para No.4 of the writ
petition justifying the absence, the present
writ petition is allowed. The Appellate
Order dated
11.08.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by the
respondent No.1 is, accordingly, set aside.
The said respondent shall re-hear the
appeal of the
petitioner.
Necessary exercise be done within a period
of 3 months from the receipt of the
03-01-2019 Page 87 of 135

211 CWP 26820/16 DPS Sector 19 Reg.DirectingRespo Consequently, the present petition is
08-02-2017 27-03-2017 26-06-2017 Directorate Letter has been issued
HR(PS) Faridabad ndentNo 1 ie the disposed of with a direction to respondents on 31.05.17 to conduct
Parents Government of
No.1 and 3 to comply with the order dated the audit under Rule
Association Haryana
24.7.2015, for the purpose of conducting 158-A
v/s Department of
State & Ors. School the audit of the school funds
Education and of respondent No.6, within a period of
RespondentNo 3 ie three months from the date of receipt of
Director certified copy of this order. In case, the
School Education order is not complied with, the petitioner
Government of may, if so advised, avail the remedy of filing
Haryanato application for revival of this petition or
conduct a
for initiating contempt proceedings.
comprehensiveaudi
t of the School
funds of
RespondentNo 6 ie
Delhi Public School
Sector 19Faridabad
Haryana
212 CWP 2685/18 Nirmal Dhull Reg.Promotion for That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
07-02-2018 08-03-2018 07-06-2018 Directorate File in similar case is
HR(G-I) v/s the post of Principal this stage, only with a direction to the sent to the C.S for
State & Ors. being a
respondents to consider and decide the clarification on roaster
handicapped
claim of the petitioner, as also her point
person
order. And
with law. Needless to assert that in the
event the claim of the petitioner is
declined, the authority shall pass a
support thereof
213 CWP 27196/16 Sushma Rani Reg.Transfer This petition is disposed of with a direction
23-12-2016 25-01-2017 04-02-2017 Directorate Participated in Second
Coordination v/s to respondent No.2 to look into the Drive
State & Ors.
grievance of the petitioner and consider it
sympathetically in
the 2nd transfer drive of Post Graduate
Teachers in the Education Department,
Haryana. Let the final decision be taken
within a week or 10 days at most and
conveyed to the petitioner.
03-01-2019 Page 88 of 135

214 CWP 27356/18 Uday Veer Reg.Regularization At this stage, this petition is being disposed
26-11-2018 21-11-2018 20-02-2019 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service of by giving direction to the respondents to
State & Ors.
consider the case of the petitioner keeping
in view the judgment passed in
CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder Singh and
others V/s. State of Haryana and others,
decided on 04.10.2018 within a period of
certified copy of this order failing which
Rs.50,000/- will be paid by the respondents
to the petitioner as costs.
215 CWP 27369/18 Mahabir Singh Reg.Promotion for The petition is being disposed of by giving
30-10-2018 12-11-2018 11-02-2019 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s the post of direction to the respondents to pass
State & Ors. Headmaster High
speaking order on the legal notice dated
School
14.08.2018 (Annexure P-7) within a period
of four months from the date of receipt of
216 CWP 27411/18 Bhateri Devi Reg.Regularization This petition is being disposed of by giving
26-10-2018 21-11-2018 20-02-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service direction to the respondents to pass
State & Ors.
appropriate order keeping in view detailed
order passed in CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder
Singh and others V/s. State of Haryana and
others, decided on 04.10.2018, within a
period of three months from
order failing which Rs.50,000/- will be paid
to the petitioner as cost
217 CWP 27428/16 Kailash Chand & Reg.Higher Pay Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem
20-02-2018 28-03-2018 27-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. Scale which was that the matter in issue is squarely covered
v/s subject matter in
by an order and judgment, dated
State & Ors. CWP No.8082/01
and same was 20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP
allowed while No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.
restricting arrears State of Haryana and others). And,
of pay to 38 months therefore, the petition at hands be disposed
to the filing of the of in the same terms.
writ petition Ordered accordingly.
03-01-2019 Page 89 of 135

218 CWP 27571/17 Krishna Devi & Reg.State Teacher In response, learned State counsel submits
09-02-2018 12-03-2018 09-04-2018 Directorate
Coordination Ors. Award that the claim of the petitioners, as also
v/s
their representation dated 13.09.2017
State & Ors.
(Annexure P3 Colly.), shall be considered
and dealt with by the respondent authority
within a period of 4 weeks from today. And
the appropriate orders, in accordance with
law, shall be passed and communicated to
the petitioners as
also their counsel.
That being so, the petition is disposed of in
the above terms. Needless to assert that in
the event the claim of the petitioners is
reasons in support thereof
219 CWP 28131/18 Jasveer Kaur & Reg.Regularization At this stage, present petition is disposed of
01-11-2018 21-11-2018 20-02-2019 Directorate
HRME-I Ors of Service by giving direction to respondents to
v/s
examine the case of the petitioners in view
State & Ors.
of the order dated 04.10.2018 passed by
this Court in Balwinder Singh and others
vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP
No.2009 of 2016 (Annexure P-6), especially
keeping in view that services of similarly
situated employees
have already been regularized as per
Annexure P-3 (Colly.) and pass appropriate
order(s) in accordance with law within a
receipt of certified copy of this order. In
case, no order is passed within the
stipulated period, costs of Rs.50,000/- will
be imposed
upon the respondent-State
03-01-2019 Page 90 of 135

220 CWP 29123/17 Mam Chand Reg.Grant Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
20-12-2017 09-01-2018 08-04-2018 Directorate
PEN-II Sharma Pensionary benefits with the direction to respondent No.2- The
v/s
Director General, Secondary Education,
State & Ors.
Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5,
Panchkula to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioner in the aforesaid
legal notice dated November 06, 2017
(P-13) and take a conscious decision by
passing a speaking order, within a period
However, in case, petitioner still feels
aggrieved of the order passed by concerned
authority, he shall be at liberty to
221 CWP 29140/17 Sangeeta Ashri & Reg.Grant the Without making any comment on the
06-03-2018 21-03-2018 20-06-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. benefit of Selection merits of the case, this petition is disposed
v/s Grade
State & Ors.
decide the legal notice dated 30.10.2017
(Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking
order after hearing the petitioners or their
representatives within a period of three
certified copy of this order. In case the
benefit is granted, there will be no need to
pass a speaking order and the claim can be
decided by passing office order. In case an
adverse order is proposed then necessity of
hearing will arise.
03-01-2019 Page 91 of 135

222 CWP 2941/16 Pawan Kumar & Reg.Challenge the For orders see judgment of even date
15-02-2016 04-05-2016 03-06-2016 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. transfer orders passed in CWP No.1098 of 2016 Yashpal
v/s
Singh & others Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
State & Ors.
CWP NO.1098/16 ORDERS
A perusal of the afore-referred preliminary

fact finding inquiry by the DEO, Rohtak
shows recommendation of disciplinary
proceedings against the Principal and the
TGTs mentioned therein. It is directed that
the final decision with regard to the same
be taken by the competent Authority
expeditiously but not later than one month
of this order.
223 CWP 29591/17 Ramesh Chand Reg.Appointment In the first instance, the competent
21-12-2017 23-02-2018 09-03-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s for the post of PGT authority to consider cases of
State & Ors.
regularization in the department would
look into the grievance of the petitioner
and pass a speaking order on the legal
notice after hearing her.
Let the exercise be completed within two
copy of this order.
With these observations and directions, the
petition stands disposed of
224 COCP 2984/13 Sudesh Kumar & Reg.Grant same pay Learned State counsel undertakes to grant
12-07-2017 22-08-2017 09-08-2017 Directorate As per order dated
in CWP Ors. scales and the benefits to the petitioners as per 25.08.17 passed by the
No.8781/12 v/s allowances as
judgment of Single Bench but subject to Hon'ble High Court in
HR(AS) Smt.Surina admissible to their
decision of RA-CW No.278/15 in
Rajan, IAS & Ors. counter parts
review application, which is pending. The CWP No.8781/12
working in
necessary exercise be done within a period Sudesh Kumari V.State,
Govt.Schools
no action is required to
of four weeks
be taken in persuance of
from today. the above orders for
The petition is disposed of accordingly. implementation of order
However, in case, the respondents fail to dt. 12.07.17 as the order
comply with the order as per undertaking, dt. 16.01.12 will not be
the petitioners are at liberty to move an given effect to during the
application for pendency of the review
revival of contempt petition. application
03-01-2019 Page 92 of 135

225 CWP 29946/17 Sanjay Kumar & Reg.Advance Accordingly, the present writ petition is
29-01-2018 23-02-2018 22-04-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. increment on treated as a
v/s acquire higher
representation on behalf of the petitioners
State & Ors. qualification
and is disposed of with a direction to the
respondents to look into the grievance of
the petitioners, hearing them and take a
final decision within three months from the
date of certified copy of this order.
226 CWP 30061/17 Nisha Education Reg.The petitioner Keeping in view the above, the petitioner is
29-12-2017 01-01-2018 01-01-2018 Directorate
Academic v/s is aggrieved by the permitted to make a representation today
State & Ors. order Annexure P-4,
itself, to respondent No.2, who will pass a
whereby all the
Schools in Haryana speaking order
have been directed thereupon on 01.01.2018 by 13:00 hours.
to observe winter This petition is disposed of accordingly.
vacation from A copy of this order be given under the
25.12.2017 to signatures of Bench Secretary of this Court
08.01.2018. He
submits that
according to the
Haryana School
Education Rules
2003, a total 220
working days are
mandated and this
year because of
public violence in
Haryana caused by
the followers of
Baba Gurmit Ram
Rahim Singh, in the
month of August
2017, the schools
have not been able
to complete the
mandated period,
03-01-2019 Page 93 of 135

227 CWP 3184/18 Pawan Kumar & Reg.Selection Grade Without making any comment on the
21-03-2018 22-06-2018 21-09-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. merits of the case, this petition is disposed
v/s
State & Ors.
decide the legal notice dated
9.11.2017(Annexure P-10) by passing a
speaking order after hearing the
petitioners or their representatives within
a period of three months from the date of
case the benefit is granted, there will be no
need to pass a speaking order and the
claim can be decided by passing office
order. In case an adverse order is proposed
then necessity of hearing will arise.
228 CWP 3186/18 Harminder Reg.Count the Without expressing any opinion on the
12-02-2018 08-03-2018 07-06-2018 Directorate
HR(AS) Singh service of the merits of the case, instant petition is
v/s petitioner, from
State & Ors. 24.02.03 to 31.01.17
as regular service of No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
the petitioner for by the petitioner in his representation
retiral and dated October 10, 2017 (P-6) and to take a
pensionary benefits conscious decision by passing a speaking
order particularly in view of the judgments
in case Vijay Singh vs. State of Haryana &
ors., CWP No.16817 of 2007 dediced on
July 22, 2009 and Sheel Sharma vs. State of
Haryana & anr. CWP No.7105 of
2014 decided on July 23, 2015, within a
case, petitioner still feels
aggrieved by any of the orders passed by
the aforesaid authority, he shall be at
liberty to approach this Court.
229 CWP 3194/10 Vinod Kumar To grant Adhoc We are informed that the relief claimed in
10-08-2015 22-09-2015 Directorate Documents handover to
PGT-II v/s increment in term this writ petition is similar to that of CWP Legal Cell Haryanaq New
State & Ors. of the judgment
No.5117 of 2003 titled as Rajinder Kumar Delhi for filing SLP
CWP No.7862/06
Hanumant Singh for & others Vs. State of Haryana & others,
the purpose of which has been disposed of by a separate
retiral benefits order of even date.
Accordingly, this writ petition is also
disposed of in the same terms.
03-01-2019 Page 94 of 135
230 CWP 3541/99 Gurmail Chand Reg.Grant all For detail order see order of even date in
09-02-2017 25-04-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination & Ors. benefits of such CWP-3542-1999(O&M) titled as “Ranjodh
Singh and others vs. State of Haryana
promotion, parity in and others.”
pay scales etc.
231 CWP 3542/99 Ranjodh Singh & Reg.Grant all Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner
09-02-2017 25-04-2017 Directorate File sent to F.D
Coordination Ors. benefits of such states that the facts of the present case are
covered by the judgment of this Court
promotion, parity in passed in CWP-10269-2010 titled as
pay scales etc. “Makhan Singh vs. State of Haryana and
another” decided on 23.09.2015 and pray
that the present petitions be disposed of in
the same term.
232 CWP 3881/18 Arun Sehrawat Reg.Promotion for That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
19-02-2018 26-03-2018 21-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s teh post of PGT this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. History
claim of the petitioner, as also his legal
notice 23.01.2018 (Annexure P9), within a
period of 8 weeks from the receipt of
certified copy of this order. And pass
appropriate orders in accordance with law.
In the event the claim of the petitioner is
233 CWP 3992/18 Ravinder Kumar Reg.Delegation of In response, learned State counsel submits
20-02-2018 15-03-2018 20-03-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s power of Drawing that this petition itself shall be considered
State & Ors. and Disbursing
as representation on behalf of the
petitioner, and the respondents shall deal
with the grievance and claim of the
petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from
today. Appropriate orders, in accordance
with law, shall be passed and
communicated to the petitioner.
The petition is accordingly disposed of in
the above terms.
Needless to assert that in the event the
claim of the petitioner is declined, the
respondent authority shall pass a
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 95 of 135
234 CWP 4002/18 Hans Kaur & Ors. Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
20-02-2018 21-03-2018 20-06-2018 Directorate 13/120-18ME (6)
HRME-I v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors.
respondents No.1 to 3, to consider and
decide the claim of the petitioners, as also
their legal notice dated 16.12.2017
order.
And pass appropriate orders in accordance
event the claim of the petitioners is
declined, the respondent authority
shall pass a comprehensive order assigning
235 CWP 4049/15 Wazir Singh Reg.Consider for the For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 27-12-2017 26-02-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
State & Ors.
another.
which were never
accommodated. The
03-01-2019 Page 96 of 135

236 CWP 4107/16 Shri Ganga Ram Reg.Management of After hearing learned counsel for the
31-03-2016 25-04-2016 21-04-2016 Directorate Personal hearing on
HR(AS) Sanatan Dharma the School run by petitioner and 09.06.16 before
High School, the petitioner has
keeping in view the facts and W.ACSSE. No next date
Sargodha, been ordered to be
circumstances, this petition is disposed of hearing is fixed
Abmala taken over by way of
v/s appointment of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner
State & Ors. Administrator for a to file appeal under Section 10(4) of the
period of one year Act. It is further clarified that if 1 of 2 any
such appeal is filed by the petitioner within
one week from
today, the same shall be decided by the
Appellate Authority within two weeks
thereafter by passing a speaking order.
237 CWP 4279/18 Salochana & Ors. Reg.Regularization The present petition has been filed under
22-02-2018 09-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
State & Ors.
issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari
quashing order dated 08.08.2014 and
25.08.2014 to the extent of date
of regularization vide which the service of
the petitioners have been regularized w.e.f.
08.08.2014 and 25.08.2014 instead of
01.04.2011, the date when juniors have
been regularized.
The petition stands disposed of with the
direction to the respondents to decide the
legal notice dated 25.12.2017 and inform
the result to the petitioners within a
reasonable time.
238 CWP 4457/18 Satpal & Ors. Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
23-02-2018 21-03-2018 20-05-2018 Directorate 13/99-18ME(3)
HRME-I v/s of Service merits of the case, a direction is issued to
State & Ors.
2nd respondent to consider and decide the
legal notice dated 23.12.2017 by passing a
speaking order within a period of two
With the above direction, the petition
stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 97 of 135

239 CWP 4475/18 Anita Kapoor Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
23-02-2018 14-03-2018 13-06-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) (Retd.DEEO) Pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors.
respondents to look into the
her legal notice dated 22.11.2017
(Annexure P-1) and to decide the same in
terms of judgment passed by this Court in
CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (O&M), captioned
as “Jagat Singh Yadav v. State of Haryana
and others, decided on 20.02.2017, within
passed by the concerned authority, she
other remedies available to her as well as
240 CWP 4480/18 Ved Parkash Reg.Pensionary Without expressing any opinion on the
23-02-2018 22-03-2018 21-06-2018 Directorate
PEN-II Gupta Benefits merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors.
respondent No.2-The Director, Haryana
School Education, Shiksha Sadan,
Panchkula, Haryana to look into the
legal notice dated
the same particularly keeping in view the
judgment passed by this Court in
CWP-7684-2015 (O&M), captioned as
“Ishwar Singh v. State of Haryana and
others”, decided on 09.08.2016 (Annexure
P-4), within a period of 3 months from the
order.
available under law including filing of writ
petition.
03-01-2019 Page 98 of 135
241 CWP 4541/14 Aruna Aggarwal Reg.Retiral Benefits Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of
21-09-2018 29-10-2018 28-12-2018 Directorate
PEN-II v/s with the direction to respondent to
State & Ors.
calculate and make the interest @ 9% per
annum on the delayed payments, after
expiry of three months from the date of
retirement till the actual date(s) the
various payments of the retiral benefits
were made, within a period of two months
of this order. In case of non-compliance of
aforesaid direction, the petitioner
other remedies available to her as well as
242 CWP 4589/14 Pardeep Kumar Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
243 CWP 4590/18 Hari Parkash & Reg.Step up of pay That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
26-02-2018 12-03-2018 11-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II Ors. this stage, only with a direction to the
(Lect.History)
v/s
State & Ors. claim of the petitioners, as also their
(Annexure P14), within a period of 3
months from the receipt of certified copy of
this order.
And pass appropriate orders in accordance
event the claim of the petitioners is
declined, the respondent authority
03-01-2019 Page 99 of 135

244 CWP 4633/18 Pankaj Chauhan Reg.fill up the That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
26-02-2018 13-03-2018 08-05-2018 Directorate
T.Edu. Cell (Lecturer vacant post of this stage, only with a direction to the
Biology) principal by way of
v/s promotion instead
State & Ors. of direct grievance/claim of the petitioner, as also
recruitment his representation dated 30.05.2017
(Annexure P17), within a period of 8 weeks
support thereof.
245 CWP 4673/18 Sunil Kumar & Reg.Benefits of The factual position, as set out above, is
27-02-2018 16-03-2018 15-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. selection grade of not disputed by the learned State counsel,
v/s Rs. 7500-12000
as he submits that the issue involved in the
State & Ors. w.e.f. 01.01.96
instead of present lis
01.08.2000 is squarely covered by the decision of this
Court in the case of Jagat Singh Yadav
(supra).
In conspectus of the above, the petition is
disposed of, in terms of the decision of this
Court in Jagat Singh Yadav (supra).
246 CWP 4848/14 Surender Kumar Reg.HTET/STET for The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s the post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
passed in CWP
Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 100 of 135

247 CWP 4866/18 Krishan Kumar Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
28-02-2018 15-03-2018 14-06-2018 Directorate 13/137-18ME(5)
HRME-II & Ors. of Service merits of the case, this petition is disposed File put up to Higher
v/s
of with a direction to the competent Authority
State & Ors.
authority in the office of respondent No.2
to decide the legal notice dated December
23,
2017 by passing a speaking order within
three months of the date of receiving a
248 CWP 4972/18 Raj Kali Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
27-03-2018 27-03-2018 26-06-2018 Directorate 13/103-18ME(1)
HRME-II v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors.
claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also
(Annexure P10), within a period of 3
this order. And pass appropriate orders in
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 101 of 135

249 CWP 50/14 Raman Kumari Reg.Extension in The writ petition is allowed in view of the
27-05-2015 14-08-2015 Directorate LPA filed by the
Aarohi Cell & Ors. PGT Service judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. department, the Hon'ble
English in Aarohi
7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and High Court granted stay
School
v/s others Vs. State of Haryana and another
State & Ors. decided on 27.5.2015.
CWP NO.7626 OF 2015 ORDERS
In view of what has been observed above,
Annexures P-9 and P-10 are hereby
quashed. Writ petitions are accordingly
allowed. The respondents are directed to
issue appointment letters to the petitioners
by putting a condition in the same manner
as has been put while issuing appointment
letters to the candidates who have
challenged the exemption clause vis-à-vis
sitting in HTET/STET examination
forthwith. The respondents are also
directed to issue re-appointment letters to
the petitioners, whose seravices have been
dispensed with by putting the same
condition.
250 CWP 5231/18 Naveen Lata Reg.Appointment In response, learned State counsel submits
08-03-2018 30-03-2018 22-03-2018 Directorate 13/136-18ME(4)
HRME-I v/s for the post of that the File put up to Higher
State & Ors. Statistical Assistant
claim/grievance of the petitioner shall be Authority on 13.04.18
considered and dealt with by the
respondent authorities within a period of
two weeks from today. And appropriate
orders in accordance with law, shall be
passed and
The petition is accordingly disposed of in
the above terms.
However, in the event the claim of the
petitioner is declined, the respondent
authorities shall pass a comprehensive
order assigning reasons in support
thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 102 of 135

251 CWP 5251/18 Parveen Kumar Reg.Selection Grade The factual position, as set out above, is
07-03-2018 21-03-2018 20-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) & Ors. not disputed by the learned State counsel,
v/s
rather, he submits that let this petition be
State & Ors.
disposed of
in terms of the decision of this Court,
referred to above.
That being so, the petition is disposed of, in
terms of the decision of this Court in Jagat
Singh Yadav (supra).
252 CWP 5273/18 Siri Ram & Ors. Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
06-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
State & Ors.
respondent No.2-The Director, Secondary
Education, Haryana, Siksha Sadan, Sector
5, Panchkula to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice
dated
the same as per Rules and in the light of
judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.
16084 of 1997, captioned as “Dharampal
Singh v. State of Haryana and ors”, decided
on 27.07.2000
(Annexure P-8) as well as CWP No.5563-A
of 1989, within a period of 3 months from
order.
other remedies available to them as well as
to approach this Court
253 CWP 5286/18 Ram Kumar Reg.Selection Grade The factual position, as set out above, is
14-03-2018 04-04-2018 03-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Pannu & Ors. not disputed by the learned State counsel,
v/s
who rather submits that the matter is
State & Ors.
indeed covered by the decision of this Court
in the case of R.K. Verma and others
(supra) and be disposed of in terms thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 103 of 135

254 CWP 5292/18 Harish Kumar & Reg.Selection Grade The factual position, as set out above, is
14-03-2018 28-03-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. not disputed by the learned State counsel,
v/s
who rather submits that the matter is
State & Ors.
indeed covered by the decision of this Court
in the case of R.K. Verma and others
(supra) and be disposed of in terms thereof.
255 CWP 5332/18 Sandeep & Ors. Reg.HRA That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
06-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors.
claim of the petitioners as also their
representation, dated 18.12.2017
months from the receipt of a certified copy
of this order. And, pass appropriate orders
in accordance with law. In the event, the
authority shall pass a comprehensive
256 CWP 5422/18 Ram Swaroop & Reg.Step up of pay Let the exercise be completed within one
07-03-2018 06-04-2018 05-05-2018 Directorate 13/134-18ME(3)
HRME-I Anr. (Lab month from the date of receiving of
Attendant)
certified copy of this order. In case, hearing
v/s
State & Ors. of the petitioners is necessary, then order
be passed within one month thereafter. In
the event, the petitioners are found entitled
to the stepping of pay, then arrears be
calculated and paid to them within the
next two months. However, actual payment
is restricted to the three years prior to the
filing of the petition and
the previous years will carry only notional
benefits.
petition stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 104 of 135

257 CWP 5568/14 Naresh Kumar & Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I Ors. post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s Hindi/English
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
258 CWP 5622/18 Lal Singh & Ors. Reg.Benefit of Without expressing any opinion on the
08-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
HR(G-II) v/s refixation of pay merits of the case, the instant petition is
State & Ors. after restoring the
benefits of adhoc
relief and DA cut as respondent No.2-The Director, Secondary
on 01.04.1979 Education, Haryana, Siksha Sadan, Sector
5, Panchkula to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice
dated
the same as per Rules and in the light of
judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.
16084 of 1997, captioned as “Dharampal
Singh v. State of Haryana and ors”, decided
on 27.07.2000
(Annexure P-8) as well as CWP No.5563-A
of 1989, within a period of 3 months from
order.
to approach this Court
03-01-2019 Page 105 of 135

259 CWP 5673/18 Jagpal Singh & Reg.Benefits of Learned State counsel submits that the
08-03-2018 14-03-2018 03-05-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Ors. selection grade of claim/grievance of the petitioners as also
v/s Rs. 7500-12000
State & Ors. w.e.f. 01.01.96
instead of (Annexure P-10),
01.08.2000 shall be considered and dealt with within a
period of eight weeks from today. And
appropriate orders, in accordance with
law, shall be passed.
support thereof.
260 LPA 568/17 in Anil Kumar Reg.Consider for the Since other similarly situated persons have
15-10-2018 30-10-2018 27-11-2018 Directorate
CWP v/s post of PGT been granted the benefit, we therefore
No.2102/13 State & Ors. Mathematics
dispose of the appeal with a direction to
Coordination
the respondents that consideration be
granted to the appellant as expeditiously
as possible preferably within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order. Result of the
appellant is returned back to the learned
State counsel.
261 CWP 5753/17 Sudhir & Ors. Reg.Promotion for For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II v/s the post of PGT date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
State & Ors.
262 CWP 5781/15 Subhash Chand REg.Consider for the In view of what has been observed above,
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi the writ petitions are allowed and the granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
directions are issued to the respondents to No.1220 of 2015 against
call the petitioners for counselling and the order dt.04.06.15
issue the appointment letters to them for
the post of PGT in respect of categories for
which they have been appeared
orinterviewed. The petitioners are also
entitled for consequential benefit of
seniority.
03-01-2019 Page 106 of 135

263 CWP 5806/13 Sudesh Kumar, Reg.Termination of Accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be
06-12-2017 25-01-2018 22-02-2018 Directorate
Coordination Lect.Hindi Service due to not allowed with costs which are imposed to
v/s having requisite
the tune of Rs.10,000/- upon Smt. Suman
State & Ors. qualification
Lata, District Education Officer who had
filed the reply and has vehemently opposed
the reappointment of the petitioner on
solely untenable grounds.
Accordingly, directions are issued to
respondent no. 2 to adjust the petitioner as
a guest faculty on the same terms and
conditions as earlier within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt of
certified copy of the order. Preference be
given to her appointment in Government
Senior Secondary School, Khanpur Kalan
as it has been informed by the counsel for
the petitioner as per communication dated
05.12.2017 that there are two sanctioned
posts available in the said school.
264 CWP 5918/18 Anoop Singh Reg.Count previous That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
12-03-2018 30-03-2018 29-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-III v/s service for the this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. purpose of pay
fixation
claim/grievance of the petitioner as also
his legal notice, dated 23.8.2017 (Annexure
P-9), within a period of three months from
the receipt of a certified copy of this order.
And, pass appropriate orders in accordance
petitioner is declined, the authority shall
pass a comprehensive
(
03-01-2019 Page 107 of 135

265 CWP 5972/17 Sunil Kumar Reg.RTI information Presuming that the observation made by a
23-03-2017 16-05-2017 15-06-2017 Directorate
PGT-II Bansal regarding surplus of quasi-judicial authority is in consonance
v/s some Lecturer
with the actual facts, I dispose of this
State & Ors.
petition with a direction that in case the
petitioner approaches the State
Information Officer-cum-Superintendent of
the office of Director, Secondary
Education,Branch PGT-II, and the Director,
School Education, Panchkula, within a
period of one month, the information
pertaining to points No. 2, 3 and 4
which is alleged to have been supplied to
the petitioner on 20.07.2016 (as recorded
in order of the State Information
Commissioner, Haryana dated
29.08.2016, the information at points No.
2, 3 and 4 will be re-supplied to the
petitioner at the cost of the petitioner.
In case of non-compliance of this order, it
will be open to the petitioner to approach
this Court again.
266 CWP 6020/15 Yatender Kumar Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. The Hon'ble High Court
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
267 CWP 6024/15 Vinti Gulati Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 108 of 135

268 CWP 604/94 Mahadev & Ors. Reg.Release Arrear Petitioners have been found entitled for the
01-10-2014 27-11-2014 26-02-2015 Directorate Recovery Stayed.
HR(AS) v/s of pay of account of requisite amount of grant-in-aid for the State filed LPA
State & Ors. revision of pay
posts held by them. Accordingly, No.933/15 filed on
scales
respondent no.1 is 29.06.15 and same is
directed to release the requisite amount of fixed for hearing on
grant-in-aid for the posts held by the 26.10.17
petitioners, within a period of three
copy of this order, failing which petitioners
shall be entitled for receiving the amount
of grant-in-aid for the posts held by them,
alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. from the
date the amount became due till its
payment.
Resultantly, with the abovesaid
observations made and directions issued,
instant writ petition stands allowed,
however, with no order as to costs.
269 CWP 6112/18 Karam Singh Reg.Promote as That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
13-03-2018 28-03-2018 27-06-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s Lecturer Geography this stage, only with a direction to the
State & Ors. w.e.f. the year
2005-06 when
become eligible for claim/grievance of the petitioner as also
promotion his representation, dated 27.12.2016
(Annexure P-5) within a period of three
months from the receipt of a certified copy
of this
order. And, pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law. In the event, the
order, assigning reasons in support thereof.
270 CWP 6169/15 Baby Goyal Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 109 of 135

271 CWP 6179/18 Chanderbhan Reg.Refixation of Without expressing any opinion on the
14-03-2018 21-05-2018 20-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) Sharma & Ors. pay & pension merits of the case, the instant petition is
v/s
State & Ors.
respondent No.2-The Director, Primary
Education, Forest Building, Sector 17,
Chandigarh to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioners in the
representation dated 09.12.2017 (P-7) and
to decide the same as per Rules and in the
light of
judgments referred to above in para no.1 of
this order, within a period of 3 months
of this order. In case of
non compliance of this order, petitioners
272 CWP 6241/18 Geeta Devi Reg.Regularization As to this, learned counsel for the
20-03-2018 07-05-2018 19-06-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service respondents submits that the
State & Ors.
claim/grievance of the petitioners as also
their legal notice dated 21.11.2017
(Annexure P-8), shall be considered and
dealt with within a period of three months
from today. And, appropriate orders, in
accordance with law, shall be passed.
The petition is accordingly, disposed of, in
the above terms.
However, in the event, the claim of the
petitioners is declined, the
respondents-authority shall pass a
support thereof.
273 CWP 6277/15 Khazan Singh Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 110 of 135
274 CWP 6289/15 Savita Rani Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
275 CWP 6292/18 Harish Chander Reg.Release the Instant petition is disposed of with a
14-03-2018 04-04-2018 03-06-2018 Directorate 13/123-18ME(3)
HRME-I v/s pensionary benefits direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to look Information awaited
State & Ors.
into the grievances unfolded by the from DEO Karnal
petitioner in the legal notices and to take a
conscious decision by passing a speaking
order considering all the facts narrated in
the aforesaid legal notices within a period
of two months from the date of receipt of a
certified copy of this order. In case,
competent authorities comes to the
conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the
relief(s) claimed, same be released to him
within a period of next 45 days. Factum of
interest in view of judgment passed by Full
Bench of this Court in case A.S.Randhawa
vs. State of Punjab and others, 1997 (3)
SCT, 468 as well as judgment passed by this
Court in CWP No. 8772 of 2015 captioned
as Charan Dass vs. State of Punjab and
others decided on 11.07.2017 and
Instructions No. 1/2(152)01-2 FR II dated
20.02.2002, issued by the Government of
Haryana, be also considered on delayed
payment(s).
5. However, if petitioner still feels
aggrieved by any of the orders
passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall
be at liberty to approach this
Court.
03-01-2019 Page 111 of 135

276 CWP 630/17 Rakesh Kumar Reg. HTET In our considered view, unless the Rule is
17-01-2017 13-02-2017 27-02-2017 Directorate Relaxation in HTET
Coordination v/s found to be inconsistent with any Marks
State & Ors.
Constitutional provision or a Statute or
against public
policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ
Court to interfere with it and assume the
role of Rule Making Authority. The
amendment, substitution or streamlining
of the existing provisions, essentially falls
within the purview of Rule Making
Authority. It is thus not necessary to
express any views on merits, rather we
petition with a
direction to respondent No.1 to entertain
this petition as a representation on behalf
of the petitioner and consider his grievance
in accordance with the State policy. It shall
be appreciated if an appropriate decision is
taken
within a period of two weeks from the date
The petitioner shall be required to send a
copy of the writ petition alongwith
certified copy of this order to respondent
No.1.
Further the petitioner belongs to reserve
category of Scheduled Caste. He claims that
under the Rules there is a provision to give
relaxation to the Scheduled Caste and
backward class candidates. If such
relaxation is permissible qua academic
qualification also, the authorities are
directed to consider the petitioner's claim
for that relaxation as well.
Needless to say that if the petitioner's
claim is accepted, then he will also be
entitled to call for the interview as per his
merit.
Dasti.
(
03-01-2019 Page 112 of 135

277 CWP 6375/18 Ranbir Singh & Reg.Grant the Accordingly, this petition is disposed of
15-03-2018 04-04-2018 30-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-IV Ors. benefit of selection with a direction to the respondents to
(Lect.in.Pol.Sci.) grade
consider the case of the petitioners
v/s
State & Ors. regarding pay anomaly and decide the
legal notices by passing a reasoned order
on them in the light of the case law relied
upon by the petitioners. Let the exercise be
completed within 8 weeks from the date of
receiving of certified copy of this order.
278 CWP 6381/15 Shakuntla Devi Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
279 CWP 6501/14 Harvinder Reg.Quashing the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I Kaushal impugned order dt. judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s 18.01.14 (P-12) and
State & Ors. notice dated nil
(P-13) to the extent
of denying
counseling for
passed in CWP
issuing
appointment letter
to the candidates
Haryana
like the petitioners
who have acquired
their qualification
of Post Graduate
from IASE
03-01-2019 Page 113 of 135

280 CWP 6572/18 Shashi sood Reg.Revision of In view of submission made by learned
16-03-2018 25-04-2018 24-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) v/s pension w.e.f. counsel for the petitioner but without
State & Ors. 01.11.07 on account
expressing any opinion on the merits of the
of her notional pay
fixation in the case, instant petition is disposed of with a
revised pay scale of direction to respondent No. 2 to look into
Re.7500-12000 the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in
w.e.f. 01.01.96 her representation dated 08.01.2018 (P-6)
in
accordance with law, rules and
regulations, within a period of three
months from the date of receipts of
However, in case the petitioner feels
dissatisfied by any inaction of the
authorities concerned, she shall be at
liberty to have recourse to the other
remedies available under the law,
including to approach this Court.
281 CWP 6584/15 Balwan Singh Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of granted stay in LPA
State & Ors.
Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015. No.1220 of 2015 against
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 114 of 135

282 CWP 66/14 Rekha Dhariwal Reg.Experience These two aspects have neither explained 08-06-2017 07-07-2017 Directorate Charge sheet has been
HR(G-I) v/s Certificate produced in the written statement nor the learned issued. Reply is still
State & Ors. at the time of
Assistant Advocate General had been able awaited from petitioner.
Appointment as
to show me how the action can be justified. File No.5/83-10 G-I has
Principal found
In the circumstances, I have no option but already been sent to
forged and false
to set aside the impugned order of the W.ACSSE on 14.09.18,
after inquiring for
termination of the services. However that
decision
would not result in automatic release of
consequential benefits to the petitioner. It
is directed that the respondents would
issue her regular chargesheet within 1
month from the date of the receipt of a
certified copy of this order. The
petitioner would be granted a period of 30
days to file reply. Thereafter the
respondents would have 3 effective dates
spread over a period of 2 months to lead
their evidence and similarly the petitioner
would get 3 opportunities spread over 2
months to lead her evidence. The
disciplinary proceedings must be
completed on or before 31.12.2017 and any
consequential relief to the
petitioner would be dependent on the
order to be passed in the disciplinary
proceedings. In case the disciplinary
proceedings are not completed on or
before 31.12.2017 (subject to the
petitioner not obstructing the same) she
would be entitled to all consequential
benefits of this order setting aside her
termination and would be entitled to all
retiral benefits also.
The instant petition stands disposed of in
the above terms. A copy of this order be
handed over the learned Assistant
Advocate General as well as learned
counsel for the petitioner under the
signature of the Bench Secretary so that
time limits can be adhered to.
pending Civil Misc.
Application, if any, also stands disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 115 of 135
283 CWP 6608/15 Mamta Sharma REg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
284 CWP 6696/15 Shakuntla Devi Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
285 CWP 6779/15 Abhilasha Arora Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
286 CWP 6781/15 Bela Rani Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 116 of 135

287 CWP 6784/15 Surender Kumar Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
288 CWP 6824/18 Harish Chander Reg.Selection Grade Instant petition is disposed of with a
19-03-2018 06-04-2018 05-08-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) & Ors. direction to respondent No.2- Director,
v/s
State & Ors.
Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to
look into the grievances unfolded by the
petitioners in legal notices (Annexures P-8
to P-10) and to decide the same as per
rules, regulations and instructions as well
as in the light of Jagat Singh Yadav's case
(supra) (Annexure P-7), within
a period of four months from the date of
4. However, if the petitioners still feel
aggrieved against the order passed by the
concerned authority, they shall be at
liberty to have recourse to
the other remedies as well as to approach
this Court.
289 CWP 6901/15 Phool Kumar Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 117 of 135

290 CWP 6904/15 Anil Kumar Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Sanskrit of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
291 CWP 7047/18 Subhash Chand Reg.Transfer Like in CWP No. 4376 of 2018 titled as
21-03-2018 11-04-2018 Directorate
Academic v/s Mahender Pal and another Vs. State of
State & Ors.
Haryana and another disposed of on
22.02.2018, this petition is disposed of with
the direction to the respondents to treat
the petition as a representation and to
decide the same in accordance with law as
was directed in the above mentioned
petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that no fresh date has been notified for the
transfer process. It is expected that the
grievance of the petitioner will be looked
into before the cases of transfer are taken
up.
The petition is disposed of as above.
292 CWP 7057/15 Dhanpat Devi Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
PGT-I v/s post of PGT of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Matter
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 118 of 135

293 CWP 7140/18 Jagdish & Ors. Reg.Grant the Contends, that the matter involving an
22-03-2018 16-07-2018 15-10-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s benefit of advanced identical issue, i.e. CWP No. 29946 of 2017
State & Ors. increments in lieu
(Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. State of
of higher
qualification Haryana and another), has since been
disposed of by this Court, vide order and
judgment dated 29.1.2018, the matter at
hands too be disposed of in the same terms.
Ordered accordingly
294 CWP 7145/15 Rajesh Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
295 CWP 7194/18 Sher Mohd. Reg.Promotion for That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
22-03-2018 04-04-2018 30-05-2018 Directorate File put up to W.ACSSE
PGT-III v/s the post of Lecturer this stage, only with a direction to the for approval
State & Ors. in Political Science
claim of the petitioner, as also legal notice
dated 11.12.2017 (Annexure P-5), within a
period of eight weeks from the receipt of
certified copy of this order. And pass
appropriate orders in accordance with law.
In the event, the claim of the petitioner is
declined, the respondents-authority shall
03-01-2019 Page 119 of 135

296 CWP 7626/15 Gurmail Kaur & Reg.Consider for the In view of what has been observed above,
PGT-I Ors post of PGT Annexures P-9 and P-10 are hereby Matter
v/s
quashed. Writ petitions are accordingly The Hon'ble High Court
State & Ors.
allowed. The granted stay in LPA
respondents are directed to issue No.1215 of 2015 against
appointment letters to the petitioners by the order dt.27.05.15
putting a condition in the same manner as
has been put while issuing appointment
letters to the candidates who have
challenged the exemption clause vis-à-vis
sitting in HTET/STET examination
forthwith. The respondents are also
directed to issue re-appointment letters to
the petitioners, whose services have been
dispensed with by putting the same
condition.
03-01-2019 Page 120 of 135

297 CWP 7766/16 Sonu Rani Reg.Consider for the For order, see judgment of even date
13-11-2017 01-12-2017 31-01-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT English passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun
State & Ors.
Singh & others Vs. State of Haryana &
another.
ORDER IN CWP No.25682 of 2014,

which were never
accommodated. The necessary exercise be
concluded within a period of two months
from the
date of receipt of certified copy of the
judgment.
298 CWP 7773/15 Parmila Rani Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781
State & Ors.
granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 121 of 135

299 CWP 7872/15 Uma Rani Reg.Consider for the The present writ petition is allowed in
PGT-I v/s post of PGT Hindi terms of order dated 04.06.2015 passed in Matter
State & Ors.
CWP No.5781 of 2015 titled as Subhash The Hon'ble High Court
Chand vs. State of Haryana and others. granted stay in LPA
passed in CWP
of Haryana
300 CWP 7951/18 Shiv Narayan Reg.Grant the Learned State counsel submits that the
02-04-2018 26-04-2018 01-07-2018 Directorate File sent to PGT-Ii vide
HR(G-I) Verma benefit of antedated claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also letter No.6/49-18G-I (2)
v/s promotion with all
his legal notice dated 20.02.2018 dt.14.06.18, reminder
State & Ors. consequential
(Annexure P8), shall be considered and also given on 09.08.18
benefits w.e.f.
dealt with by the respondents within a for fixation of seniority.
01.01.96
period of three months from today. And, Report is still awaited
law, shall be passed and communicated to
the petitioner.
support thereof.
301 CWP 8053/13 Kanwar Singh & Reg.Promotion for For orders, see the detailed order of even
PGT-II Anr. the post of Lecturer date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant A.G.Haryana raised
v/s Sociology
State & Ors.
03-01-2019 Page 122 of 135

302 CWP 8095/18 Sube Singh Reg.Deemed date of In response, learned State counsel submits
02-04-2018 30-04-2018 01-07-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s regularization of that claim/grievance of the petitioner as
State & Ors. service
also his legal notice, dated 8.11.2017
decided within a period of three months
from today.
And appropriate orders, in accordance
with law, shall be passed and
the above terms. In the event, the claim of
the petitioner is declined, the authority
303 C.M 8098/15 in Shriom Reg.Forced to In view of the above, let the petitioner now
10-03-2017 31-03-2017 20-05-2017 Directorate Matter is to be decided
CWP v/s petitioner to submit a by FFRC Ambala
No.23933/13 State & Ors. purchase the books
representation to the Divisional
HR(PS) and note books
Commissioner, Ambala within a period of
two weeks from today. If such a
representation is made, the same shall be
considered and decided by the Committee
within a period of eight weeks from the
date of submission of the representation.
Decision so taken be
conveyed to the petitioner forthwith.
Application stands disposed of accordingly.
Copy of the order be given dasti to the
counsel for the parties under signatures of
the Bench Secretary of this Court.
304 CWP 8113/17 Krishan Kumar Reg.Step up of pay In this view of the matter, we dispose of
21-04-2017 15-06-2017 14-12-2017 Directorate
PGT-I v/s this writ petition without expressing any
State & Ors.
views on merits, with a direction to the
authorities to examine the claim of the
petitioners as contained in the
above-mentioned legal notice and decide
the same by way of reasoned order within
a period of six months from the date of
receiving a certified copy of this order.
03-01-2019 Page 123 of 135

305 CWP 8137/18 Guru Ditta Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
03-04-2018 11-04-2018 10-07-2018 Directorate 13/146-18ME(6)
State & Ors.
claim of the petitioner, as also the legal
notice dated 25.01.2018 (Annexure P6),
And, pass appropriate orders in accordance
petitioner is declined, the
respondent-authority shall pass a
support thereof.
306 CWP 8254/18 Sheela Vinodia Reg.Count the Without expressing any opinion on the
04-04-2018 30-04-2018 29-07-2018 Directorate Matter is under
HR(G-I) v/s service of 04 years merits of the case, instant petition is consideration & letter is
State & Ors. & 10 months
disposed of with a direction to respondent issued to DEO,Panchkula
rendered by him in
the Education No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded
Department, Punjab by the petitioner in the legal notice dated
towards pensionary 17.03.2016 (P-7) and to take a conscious
benefits as per decision by passing a speaking order,
pension rules and within a period of three months from the
settled proposition date of receipt of a certified
of law with all copy of this order. However, if petitioner
consequential still feels aggrieved by any of the orders
benefits i.e. revision
passed by the aforesaid authority, she shall
of
pension and all
be at liberty to approach this Court.
other pensionary
benefits, arrears of
pension along with
interest @ 18% per
annum from the
date due till
payment
03-01-2019 Page 124 of 135

307 CWP 8255/18 Liyakat Ali & Reg.Promotion for In response, learned State counsel submits
04-04-2018 25-04-2018 03-07-2018 Directorate
PGT-III Ors. the post of PGT that claim/grievance of the petitioners as
v/s
also their legal notice, dated 29.1.2018
State & Ors.
decided within a period of three months
from today.
with law, shall be passed.
the petitioners is declined, the authority
308 CWP 8275/18 Krishna Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
04-04-2018 28-05-2018 27-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service w.e.f. this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors. 25.08.14 instead of
01.04.11
decide the claim of the petitioner, as also
her legal notice, dated 16.1.2018
accordance with law. In the event the
comprehensive
309 CWP 8297/14 Pawan Kumar, Reg.Consider for the For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626
PGT-I v/s post of PGT of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus Matter
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 125 of 135

310 CWP 8437/15 Bharat Bhushan Reg.Consider for the The writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I & Ors. post of PGT Hindi, judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s Eng & Mathematics
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
311 CWP 8509/18 Kamla Reg.Regularization That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
05-04-2018 23-05-2018 22-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-II v/s of Service this stage, only with a direction to the
State :& Ors.
claim of the petitioners, as also their legal
notice, dated 6.1.2018 (Annexure P-12),
receipt of certified copy of this order. And
with law. In the event the claim of the
petitioners is declined, the respondent
312 CWP 8609/14 Managing Reg.Release Respondent-Institution is hereby directed
30-05-2017 13-02-2018 29-08-2017 Directorate 4/67-14 AS(2)
HR(AS) Committee MLA Grant-in-Aid to release HRA to the petitioner
Sr.Sec.School
immediately. Insofar as reimbursement
Jatauli
v/s from the Government,, they are directed to
State & Ors. move necessary application or reminder to
the concerned State-respondent. If such
reminder/application is moved by the
respondent-institution to the Government,
concerned respondent is hereby directed to
decide the Institution's application for
grant in aid within a
period of 3 months from today.
With the above observation petition stands
disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 126 of 135

313 CWP 8632/18 Rajpati Reg.Pensionary Instant petition is disposed of with a
06-04-2018 30-04-2018 29-08-2018 Directorate
PEN-II v/s Benefits direction to respondents to look into the
State & Ors.
legal notice dated 03.10.2017 (P-5) and to
take a conscious decision in accordance
with law within a period of four months
of this order.
aforesaid authorities, she shall be at liberty
to have recourse to the
314 CWP 8708/18 Ashok Kumar Reg.Grant the Instant petition is disposed of with a
06-04-2018 26-04-2018 25-07-2018 Directorate
HR(G-I) sharma & Ors. benefit of selection direction to respondents to consider the
v/s grade w.e.f.01.01.96
State & Ors. instead of
01.08.2000 the legal notice dated 16.11.2017 (P-11)
a
speaking order as per rules, regulations
and instructions issued by the Government
from time to time particularly in view of
the judgments referred to above in the
legal notice, within a period of three
they shall be at liberty to approach this
Court.
03-01-2019 Page 127 of 135

315 CWP 8748/18 Pooja Saharawat Reg.Consider for the In response, learned counsel for the
06-04-2018 25-04-2018 04-05-2018 Directorate
PGT-I v/s post of PGT respondents submit th a t the
claim/grievance of the petitioner as also
her representation dated 1.3.2018
dealt with within a period of four weeks
from today. And, appropriate orders, in
accordance with law, shall
be passed.
the above terms. However, in the event, the
claim/grievance of the petitioner is
declined, the respondents-authority shall
reasons
in support thereof.
316 CWP 9031/18 Rajo Devi Reg.Regularization At this stage, the present petition is
08-08-2018 11-09-2018 10-12-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service disposed of by giving direction to the
State & Ors.
Director, Secondary Education-respondent
No.2 to look into legal notice dated
appropriate orders in accordance with law
by
taking into consideration CWP No.
14622-2018, within a period of three
copy of this order.
317 CWP 9035/14 Shikha Sharma Reg.Appointment/S he writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I v/s election for the post judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
State & Ors. of PGT Mathematics
passed in CWP
Haryana
03-01-2019 Page 128 of 135

318 CWP 9153/17 Murli Dhar & Reg. The qualifying In these circumstances, without issuing
01-05-2017 19-05-2017 18-07-2017 Directorate Case put up to Higher
PEN-II Ors. service should be notice to the opposite party, the present Authority
v/s treated from the
State & Ors. date of their joining
the service, in terms to respondent
of a Division Bench No. 2 to consider the legal notice dated
judgment of this 12.7.2016 (Annexure-P-8) of the
Court, passed in petitioners and decide the same after
LPA-1318-2015, considering the Division Bench judgment of
titled as State of this Court in Parkash Chand Sharma's case
Haryana and others (supra) and other relevant law on the
Parkash Chand point, within two months from the date of
Sharma and others,
alongwith
connected cases,
decided on
21.3.2017
319 CWP 9162/18 Shalender & Anr. Reg.Deemed date of That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
18-04-2018 13-06-2018 12-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s regularization this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors.
decide the claim of the petitioners, as also
comprehensive
320 CWP 9165/18 Shimla Devi Reg.Deemed date of That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
18-04-2018 02-05-2018 01-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s regularization with this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors. all consequential
benefits
her legal notice, dated 11.1.2018
comprehensive
03-01-2019 Page 129 of 135

321 CWP 9183/18 Jeeta Devi Reg.Regularization Without expressing any opinion on the
18-04-2018 01-05-2018 30-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service merits of the case, instant petition is
State & Ors.
to look into the grievances
unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice
dated 25.07.2017 (P-8) and to decide the
same in accordance with rules and
time to time, within a period of three
copy of this order.
by any order of the aforesaid authority, she
shall be at liberty to approach this Court.
322 CWP 9253/14 Abheyender Reg.Select/Appoint he writ petition is allowed in view of the
PGT-I Singh for the post of PGT judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. Matter
v/s English
State & Ors.
passed in CWP
Haryana
323 CWP 9337/17 Asha Rani Reg.Step up of pay In response, learned State counsel submits
18-01-2018 26-02-2018 17-04-2018 Directorate
PGT-II v/s that the claim as also the grievance of the
State & Ors.
petitioner, as set out in the petition, shall
be considered and dealt with within a
period of three months from today and
law, shall be passed.
That being so, the petition is disposed of in
the above terms.
support thereof.
03-01-2019 Page 130 of 135

324 CWP 9381/18 Krishan Kumar Reg.Regularization In response, learned State counsel submits
19-04-2018 25-04-2018 14-06-2018 Directorate
HRME-I & Ors. of Service that claim/grievance of the petitioners
v/s
shall be considered and dealt with by the
State & Ors.
respondents,
within a period of eight weeks from today.
with law, shall be passed.
the petitioners is declined, the authority
shall pass a comprehensive order,
assigning reasons in support thereof.
325 CWP 9400/18 Gurdeep Singh Reg.Deemed date of That being so, the petition is disposed of, at
19-04-2018 01-05-2018 30-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s Regularization this stage, only with a direction to
State & Ors.
his legal notice, dated 15.1.2018 (Annexure
P-6), within a period of three months from
the receipt of certified copy of this order.
And
with law. In the event the claim of the
petitioner is declined, the respondent
order, assigning reasons in support thereof
326 CWP 9412/18 Krishna Devi Reg.Regularization In view of this, this petition is disposed of
19-04-2018 09-07-2018 08-09-2018 Directorate
HRME-I v/s of Service with a direction to the respondents to the
State & Ors.
respondents to decide the aforesaid legal
notice by passing a speaking order and if
necessary hearing the petitioner within
two months from the date of receipt of
03-01-2019 Page 131 of 135

327 CWP 946/17 Satish Kumar Reg.HTET In our considered view, unless the rule is
19-01-2017 14-03-2017 13-07-2017 Directorate
Coordination v/s found to be inconsistent with any
State & Ors.
Constitutional provision or a Statute or
against public
policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ
Court to interfere with it and assume the
role of Rule Making Authority. The
amendment, substitution or streamlining
of the existing provisions, is essentially an
exercise within the purview of Rule Making
Authority. It is thus not necessary to
express any views on merits, rather we
No.1 to entertain this petition as a
representation on behalf of the petitioner
and consider his grievance in
accordance with the State policy. It shall be
appreciated if the appropriate decision is
taken within a period of four months from
the date of receiving a certified copy of this
order. The petitioner shall be required to
send a copy
Ordered
03-01-2019 Page 132 of 135

328 CWP 9574/18 Jitender Singh & Reg.Quashing the Counsel states that Naveen Gautam has
20-04-2018 08-05-2018 23-05-2018 Directorate
Academic Ors. note 7 of also been relieved to join at Yamuna Nagar.
v/s endorsement of
He relies on the administrative precedent.
State & Ors. order
dt.23.02.18(Annexu He cites other instances where government
re P-4) vide which have transferred PGTs from
PGT of Mewat Cadre Mewat to different cadres and there was no
have not been rider put in those transfer and posting
allowed to be orders. Since there is administrative
relieved for joining precedent, then in the
the DIET considered opinion of this Court, and
without expressing any final opinion on the
issues involved, a direction should go to the
respondent-
Department to consider the legal notice/
representation dated 28.03.2018 which
was forwarded by the District and
Education Officer (Annex. P-13) to the
quarters concerned (Director School
Education, Panchkula).
Accordingly, direction is issued to the
competent authority to decide the
representation in accordance with law by
passing a speaking order in case the
request of the petitioner has to be declined
for any valid reason.
Let the consideration take place without
delay and within a period of a fortnight
from the date of receiving of the certified
copy of the order,
since the matter relates to educational
institutions where the students should not
suffer by reasons of delay in posting
teachers to their schools, of any kind.
present petition is disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 133 of 135

329 LPA 975/15 in Arya High School Reg.Payment of As regard to respondent No.2, we have
20-09-2016 29-11-2016 Directorate 4/30-14 AS(2)
CWP Trust & Arrear of pay along heard learned counsel for the parties at a Write to DEO Rohtak
No.2473/14 Management with interest
considerable length. It is not in dispute that vide letter No.4/82-15
HR(AS) Society
the orders AS (4) dt. 04.5.17 for
v/s
passed by the District Education Officer, compliance the court
Sushila Devi
Haryana and Director, Secondary orders and reminder
also issued on 29.05.17,
Education, Haryana in their appellate
reminder also issued
capacities, are separately under again on 23.10.18
challenge at the instance of the
management in CWP Nos.24873 & 25087
of 2015, which is still pending and since the
legality of those orders is yet to be
determined by this Court, we find no
justification to accept the claim for
consequential benefits at the instance of
respondent No.2, at this stage. Till the
above-cited writ petitions are decided on
merits, such a claim being premature,
respondent No.2 is held entitled to arrears
of pay only w.e.f. the date of the order of
learned Single Judge in these proceedings
i.e. from 01.04.2015 onwards. These
directions are without prejudice to the
rights of the parties which are sub-judice in
above-stated pending writ petitions.
(10) With these observations and
directions, the instant appeal stands
disposed of.
03-01-2019 Page 134 of 135

330 CWP 9887/13 Dr.Rakesh Reg.Consider for the Since this Court has already directed that
11-03-2015 16-04-2015 15-06-2015 Directorate
Aarohi Cell v/s post of Principal one post under the SC Category be kept
State & Ors.
reserved, the respondents are directed to
allow the petitioner to take the
examination in respect of the advertised
posts of Principal. The respondents are also
directed to take further steps in view of
what has been observed above and make
arrangement for conducting the
examination of the petitioner, so that he
would be able to take the same.
It is expected that the respondents
authorities would conduct the examination
as early as possible preferably within a
period of two
copy of this order.
With the above observations, the writ
331 CWP 9949/18 Sushila & Ors. Reg.Regularization The issue is open for the competent
24-04-2018 16-05-2018 15-08-2018 Directorate
HRME-II v/s of Service authority to look into in accordance with
State & Ors.
law by passing a speaking order.
Accordingly, the instant
petition is disposed of with a direction to
the respondents to consider and decide the
legal notice after hearing the petitioners or
their representative/s effectively before
assigning comprehensive reasons upon
which the
decision is proposed to be passed. The
decision be taken within three months
this order and conveyed
to the petitioners within the same time
frame. If relief is deserved, it may be
granted without the necessity of passing a
reasoned order.
03-01-2019 Page 135 of 135

20CD PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

20CD PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 03-Jan-19

03-01-2019 Page 1 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 2 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 3 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 4 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 5 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 6 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 7 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 8 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 9 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 10 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 11 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 12 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 13 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 14 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 15 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 17 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 18 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 19 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 20 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 21 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 22 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 23 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 24 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 25 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 28 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 29 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 30 of 135

72 CWP 15072/13 Shanta Kumari Reg.Promotion for Petitioner's grievance is relating to

03-01-2019 Page 31 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 32 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 33 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 34 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 35 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 36 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 37 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 38 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 39 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 40 of 135

97 CWP 16569/17 Kulbhushan Reg.Grant benefit of Consequently, this petition is disposed of

03-01-2019 Page 41 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 42 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 43 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 44 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 45 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 46 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 47 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 48 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 49 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 50 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 51 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 53 of 135

CWP No.22554 of 2016 ORDER

In our considered view, unless the rule is

03-01-2019 Page 54 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 55 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 56 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 59 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 60 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 61 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 62 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 63 of 135

03-01-2019 Page 64 of 135