Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Research Proposal: Can the use of Multimodal Vs. Opioid Only Pain Management
Reduce Pain, and Improve Outcomes in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Surgical Patients?
Jean A. O’Connor
Abstract
Opioids are traditionally used to manage acute and chronic pain in healthcare settings.
Opioid side effects, and risk of addiction has called for alternative methods to pain
management. Multimodal pain management is one way to reduce the use of opioids.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a surgical approach that can reduce opioid
surgical groups and will be followed for 6 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis
of variance will be used to evaluate pain management in ERAS vs. non-ERAS surgical
patients, and outcome data including: complications, days to discharge, and readmission
rates. Results of this study will determine if multimodal pain management in ERAS
surgical patients reduce pain, and improve outcomes compared to current standards of
Managing acute pain in the post-operative period is one of the goals during phase
I recovery in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), (Polomano, Dunwoody, Krenzischek,
& Rathmell, 2008), and opioids have long been the gold standard of how that pain is
managed (Gupta & Gan, 2015). Opioid use continues throughout the recovery phase on
the surgical unit, and after discharge. Pain management has typically been singular in
the primary opioids of choice. However, opioid use presents with certain risks to patients
constipation, urinary retention, and addiction risk, which can affect both patient
outcomes, and health care costs (Tabler, 2016; Gupta & Gan, 2016). With the rise in our
nations opioid epidemic, there has been a mobilization to decrease opioid use in both the
opioid use during the perioperative and post-operative period, and falls under the
guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for major abdominal,
(ERAS Society, 2016). The practice of ERAS originally developed in Europe out of a
desire to fast track major abdominal surgeries, and to reduce the length of stay through a
Understanding the effectiveness of multimodal pain management vs. singular opioid use
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 4
in reducing pain, and improving outcomes in ERAS surgical patients will help to guide
how to successfully manage surgical pain, and potentially reduce outpatient opioid use.
Opioid addiction in the United States has reached a critical level (Murthy, 2016).
There is a long history of opioid use in relation to pain management for both acute and
chronic pain (Tompkins, Hobelmann & Compton, 2016). The push by pharmaceutical
treatment, and reassessment based on the 0-10 numeric pain scale, and the need to
appease pain related HCAHPS and patient satisfaction scores created by the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) tied to hospital reimbursements, has contributed
to the overuse of opioids for chronic and acute pain management (Mason, 2016;
Tompkins, Hobelmann, & Compton, 2016; Van Zee, 2009). Effective alternative
approaches to pain management are necessary to help reduce long-term opioid use.
Multimodal pain management is one option that can be used on ERAS surgical patients
that challenges the singular opioid approach to pain management throughout the
In the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) patients are traditionally managed
utilizing a singular approach to pain management with the use of opioids during Phase I
opioid use has spread beyond acute surgical management. ERAS is a relatively new way
of managing surgical patients in the United States, and ERAS protocols are guided by a
multimodal approach to pain management, reducing opioid use throughout the entire
In 1992 the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) established
clinical guidelines which set pain management goals to include reducing pain,
increasing patient satisfaction (Good, 1998). The goal of ERAS is to reduce metabolic
stress, accelerate recovery, and minimize hospital stay through the use of multimodal
(Ljungqvist, 2014).
Devin, McGirt, 2015, Kang et. al., 2013; Murato-Ooiwa, Tsukada & Wakui, 2017),
however these are not ERAS surgical cases. The ERAS protocols for gynecologic
multimodal technique, but emphasize that the current literature regarding multimodal
pain management is not related to ERAS cases (Nelson et al., 2016; Feldheiser et al.,
2016). Very little data is available comparing multimodal pain management of ERAS
surgical cases to non-ERAS surgical cases (Kehlet & Holte, 2001). One retrospective
compared to opioids in ERAS patients (Xu et. al., 2015), Non-opioid pain management in
the form of multimodal pain management and in conjunction with ERAS protocols
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 6
warrant further education and implementation (White, 2017; Stone et. al., 2017; Wardhan
opioid use alone, then we may see improved patient outcomes, and an overall reduction
in opioid use in the ERAS surgical patient population. However further research, such as
proposed in this study will be necessary to specifically identify the effects of multimodal
Theoretical Framework
Metabolic stress reduction is one of the major goals guiding the ERAS protocols.
Metabolic stress creates a catabolic state with the development of insulin resistance, and
2001)). Pain causes the release of the two major stress hormones cortisol and
ERAS protocols. ERAS protocols seek to reduce pain, and control metabolic stress
Good and Moore’s middle-range theory of acute pain management evolved from
the AHCPR guidelines, and align themselves with the ERAS principles of balancing
analgesia and side effects through propositions and interventions that focus on
(Good, 1998). According to Good (1998), “From this theory, testable hypotheses
regarding pain management can be deduced, and new findings can be used to support and
extend the theory.” Good and Moore’s theory reads analogous to the founding principles
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 7
of the ERAS protocols inspired by the early work of Professor Henrik Kehlet M.D.
(Carli, 2014; ERAS Society, 2016). This study aligns itself with Good and Moor’s theory
effective in managing pain, and improving outcomes in ERAS surgical patients vs. non-
Definition of Terms
Conceptual and operational terms and definitions used in this study include:
seeks to improve patient outcomes, and reduce length of stay with the utilization
decreased complications.
4. Numeric Pain scale-A scale ranging from 0-10 to determine a patient’s pain level.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and required by all hospitals
rates.
This study is seeking to determine if the use of multimodal pain management vs.
opioid only pain management can reduce pain and improve outcomes in ERAS surgical
patients. Data collection for this study will look at both ERAS and non-ERAS patient
reported pain levels, and outcomes that comprise of days to discharge, readmission rates,
and pulmonary embolus (PE). Data will be collected from one site through detailed data
collection questionnaires, and medical record review. Follow up will be continued on the
Internal site medical record review will be used to identify patients that qualify
for this study. ERAS and non-ERAS patients will be flagged for study participation by
their prospective surgeon. Patients will be given preoperative teaching on both ERAS and
non-ERAS approaches to their prospective surgical procedures and will chose the course
based on informed surgical consent. Patients will then follow the preoperative surgical
On the day of surgery patients will be admitted to the Ambulatory Surgery Area
(ASC) where the Data Collection Questionnaire will be initiated. ERAS cases receiving
preoperative nerve blocks will be transferred to the PACU per standard protocol, and the
Data Collection Questionnaire will be handed off from the ASC nurse to the PACU
nurse. Anesthesia will manage the preoperative nerve block, and intraoperative
anesthesia, and pain management choices per either the ERAS or non-ERAS protocols.
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 9
Surgeons will perform prospective surgical procedures per their surgical expertise.
Operating room (OR) nurses will receive the Data Collection Questionnaire on handoff
from the ASC, or PACU nurse, and will document all necessary intraoperative data.
At anesthesia end time, the patient will be transferred to the PACU for phase I
recovery. The Data Collection Questionnaire will be handed off from the OR nurse to the
PACU nurse. At the completion of phase I the patient will be transferred to the
postoperative surgical unit, and the Data Collection Questionnaire will be handed off
from the PACU nurse to the surgical floor nurse. Upon patient discharge the Research
nurse will collect all the Data Collection Questionnaires, and will continue to document
After discharge the patient will receive the self administered, mailed survey,
HCAHPS questionnaire, which will be collected to review the pain management section
questions. If the patient does not complete the HCAHPS form, this data will be collected
at the 1-month follow-up phone visit. This data collects closed-ended questions, which
has the benefits of easy administration and analysis due to number tabulation of the
at 1 month, 3 month and 6 months. Interview data are advantageous because they tend to
have higher response rates than mailed questionnaires, provide more information, and
tend to lack ambiguity (Polit & Beck, 2018). The importance of patient participation in
the postoperative surveys and interviews will need to be reinforced at the time of
discharge.
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 10
Research Design
opioid pain management in reducing pain and improving outcomes in ERAS vs. non-
ERAS surgical patients. Pain management will be evaluated based on the pain numeric
rating scale, and the HCAHPS pain management questions. Outcomes are defined as days
constipation, urinary retention, bleeding, and PE. Prospectively study participants will be
site specific and meet the surgical criteria for ERAS for GI, GYN, and Orthopedic cases,
Setting
This will be a single clinical site setting located in a community hospital. Patients
will be evaluated for eligibility during the office surgical consultation, and then followed
throughout the perioperative and postoperative period that includes: the ambulatory
surgery area, the operating room, the PACU, and the surgical unit. Follow up will be over
the phone, and not require visits unless complications require further evaluation.
Sampling
sampling for the total population sample that meet the eligibility criteria. Sample size will
include 100 men and women to be enrolled in GI, GYN, or orthopedic ERAS protocols
vs. current standards of non-ERAS surgical care protocols. Prospective sampling will
occur from one single site and include all ERAS surgical cases and identical non-ERAS
surgical cases. Prospective study participants will be site specific and meet the surgical
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 11
criteria for ERAS for GI, GYN, and Orthopedic cases, and or standard of care non-ERAS
surgical cases. Eligibility criteria include medical clearance for surgery, and the ability to
Ethical Considerations
This study consists of human subjects and two treatment modalities. Qualification
criteria for ERAS patients include the ability to follow preoperative nutritional directions,
or be assisted by someone who can. Those unable to follow directions may present a bias
for research staff. Ethical considerations include the protection of study participant’s
privacy through HIPPA, and adherence to the nurse’s code of ethics as it relates to
research (Epstein & Turner, 2015). Pain is a very personal, and subjective feeling, and
patients who experience perceived pain during their recovery, and regardless of which
protocol they may be enrolled in, may feel they are not sufficiently being relieved of their
pain, and may feel they were not fully informed of the risks. This could lead to distrust,
and withdrawal from the study. Institutional IRB approval will be obtained, and patient
Measurement Instruments
Internal site medical record data will be collected including patient reported pain
using the numeric pain scale, and the HCAHPS self administered, mailed survey
schedule at 1, 3, and 6 months, where data will be collected on hospital readmission, and
postoperative complications. The numeric pain scale will assess pain management at each
interval.
The numeric pain scale rating 0-10 is a valid and reliable tool to assess
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 12
postoperative pain (Williamson, & Hoggart, 2005). This tool will be used frequently
throughout the study to determine pain levels and response to pain management. The
measure tool devised by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and endorsed by the National Quality
Forum that measures patients’ perspectives on health care (CMS.gov, 2014). Only the
Data Collection
surgical unit, and follow-up phases of the protocol. The data collection questionnaire
will cover the following categories, however, analysis data will focus on the independent
and dependent variables. All patients will be required to sign an informed consent to
participate in this study. Patient confidentiality will be maintained under HIPPA All data
Complications Preoperatively:
Hemodynamic
Block Side Effects
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 14
Analysis
Multivariate analysis is used for complex relationships among variables (Polit & Beck,
2018). MANOVA will compare the two groups, those that are ERAS surgical patients,
and those that are not ERAS surgical patients (the independent variables). MANOVA
will determine several dependent variables, the first being the effectiveness of
multimodal pain management on ERAS surgical patients as compared to opioid only pain
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 15
Limitations
This study is not without its limitations. Pain is an individual, subjective human
experience. Personal beliefs on pain, and pain management may bias patient’s decision to
participate as an ERAS patient in this protocol. Healthcare providers are not without bias
towards what they are used to in terms of standards for pain management. Healthcare
workers lack knowledge in the area of acute pain management and have been accused of
both under medicating pain Polomano et.al., 2008), or over prescribing for pain (VanZee,
healthcare workers knowledge may be lacking in this area, and therefore bias towards
change from what is known, to what is new may exist (Ljungqvist, 2014). Therefore
advance.
Dissemination of Findings
management for ERAS surgical cases is lacking (Nelson et. al., 2016). This study will be
surgical cases, and the data should be presented to those specialties that could benefit the
effective over singular opioid use, then all disciplines that prescribe pain management for
acute pain could potentially benefit from these results as well. The main target audience
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 16
for this study includes: perioperative and surgical nurses, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and
surgical patients. The results of this study should be presented in a peer-reviewed journal
dissemination of information, from a trusted scientific source, and afford credibility to the
work being published. Options for peer-reviewed journals to incorporate the results of
this study into their publications include but are not limited to: The Journal of
Discussion
outcomes, and reduces costs related to prolonged hospital stay. Opioids have been the
gold standard for pain management, but are not without side effects. Opioid addiction
has garnered attention in the United States due to the over prescribing, and misuse of
surgical patients that includes the use of multimodal pain management to improve patient
outcomes. This protocol seeks to determine if the use of multimodal pain management vs.
singular opioid pain management will reduce pain and improve outcomes in ERAS
References
Carli, F. (2014). Henrik Kehlet, M.D., Ph.D., recipient of the 2014 excellence in research
Retrieved from:
http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1921545
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2014). HCAHPS: patients’ perspectives of
Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS.html
Devin, C.J., McGirt, M.J. (2015). Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine
Epstein, B., Turner, M. (2015). The nursing code of ethics: its value, its history. The
10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No02Man04
http://erassociety.org/guidelines/list-of-guidelines
Feldheiser, A., Aziiz, O., Baldini, G., Cox, B.P.B.W., Fearon, K.C.H., Feldman, L.S.,
Gan, T.J., Kennedy, R.H., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D.N., Miller, T., Radtke, F.F.,
Ruiz Garces, T., Schricker, T., Scott, M.J., Thacker, J.K., Ytrebo, L.M., Carli, F.
(2016). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part
Gupta, R., Gan, T.J. (2016). Enhanced recovery: perioperative pathways leading to better
http://www.anesthesiologynews.com/Monographs-White-Papers/Article/01-
16/Enhanced-Recovery-Perioperative-Pathways-Leading-to-Better-
Outcomes/34777/ses=ogst
Kang, H., Ha, Y-C., Kim, J-Y., Woo, Y-C., Lee, J-S., Jang, E-C. (2013). Effectiveness of
randomized, controlled study. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 95(4), 291-
296.
Lamplot, J.D., Wagner, E.R., Manning, D.W. (2014). Multimodal pain management in
recovery after surgery and the ERAS society. Journal of Laparoendoscopic &
Mahoney, D. (2017). Revised HCAHPS pain management questions: what you need to
hcahps-pain-management-questions-what-you-need-to-know
Mason, D. (2016). JAMA forum: the pain and opioid epidemics: policy and vital signs.
forum-the-pain-and-opioid-epidemics-policy-and-vital-signs/
Murthy, V.H. (2016). Ending the opioid epidemic-a call to action. New England Journal
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1612578#t=article
Nelson, G., Altman A.D., Nickk, A., Meyer, L.A., Ramirez, P.T., Achtari, C., Antrobus,
J., Huang, J., Scott, M., Wijk, L., Acheson, N., Ljungqvist, O., Dowdy, S.C.
Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. (2017). Resource manual for Nursing research: generating and
Nursing23(1A), S4-S14.
MULTIMODAL VS. OPIOID ONLY PAIN MANAGEMENT 20
Tabler, N.G. (2016). Over-reliance on opioids poses quality and cost concerns.
https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-474767748.html
S21l.
Van Zee, A. (2009). The promotion and marketing of OxyContin: commercial triumph,
the mechanisms of acute pain, the prescription of opioids, and the role of
Williamson, A., Hoggart, B. (2005). Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating
Xu, W., Daneshmand, S., Bazargani, S.T., Cai, J.. Miranda, G., Schuckman, A.K.,