Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
eedings in order to establish the exact identity of the property. Petitioner suggests that the
G.R. No. 175578 August 11, 2010 blueprint of the subdivision plan submitted by respondents cannot approximate substantial
compliance with the requirement. Lastly, petitioner attacks respondents claim of prior
Doctrine: the non-submission, of the original tracing cloth plan is fatal to the registration possession.
application, since the same is mandatory in original registration of title. However, in this case
there was SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE because it was previously transmitted by the Issue: In the case at bar, does the blueprint copy of the survey plan suffice for compliance
Guinto to LRA in a previous registration case involving the same properties. with the requirement?
Petitioner’s argument/s: under Sec 17 of P.D. No. 1529, the submission in court of the
original tracing cloth plan of the property is a mandatory requirement in registration