Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Project report
Project proposal
Abstract
The research project sets out to identify the most suitable performance appraisal methods to be
implemented in a small pvt sector organization. The document explains how implementation of a new
performance appraisal system will help to improve the efficiency of the staff who employed in the
organization. The organization is already flowing a performance appraisal system, however, there is a
need to improve the performance management through a new performance appraisal to measure the
post placement of the employees. The overall purpose of this project is to provide a basis for rewarding
employees in relations to their contribution to organizational goals .
The literature review explains the background to the development of performance and its measurement
in the employees post placement performance. It includes a detailed analysis of thinking on a new
performance appraisal. The literature review concluded that performance appraisal can greatly benefit
the organization. A conceptual model is developed to frame the empirical research.
The research takes the form of a case study , and the findings are collected from specifically designed
questionnaires . These are focused on the sample size which framed the issues of concern, and these
are explored in the questionnaire. The findings will reveal that there is a high level of understanding
from staff of a need for a suitable performance appraisal method.
The conclusions of the research have informed the main recommendation, to develop a news system
that is much more comprehensive, and incorporates guidelines.
Table of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 4
Research problem................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 9
4.References ......................................................................................................................................... 11
5. Appendixes ................................................................................................................................... 12
1. Introduction
Shubin has defined the term job evaluation as “ A systematic procedure for measuring the relative
value and importance of occupations on the basis of their factors ( skill, training, effort)for the purpose
of determining wage differentials .job evaluation does nothing to ascertain the actual performance of
the persons occupying such positions. This factor is the serious limitation of the technique because
employees are not equal in their skills, efficiency, attitude and loyalty. Some individuals by their skills
and efficiency can do better than their colleges who are placed in the same cadre. Such persons should
be suitably rewarded for their exceptional qualities. Besides, the employees too would like to know
whether they are able to reach the desired level of performance. For these reasons, it becomes necessary
for the management to provide some machinery or device by which the actual performance of the
employees can be measured performance appraisal provides answer for this question.
Research problem
1. to serve as a basis for pay adjustments when the job rate is not fixed
2. to determine who should be retained when work is slack
3. to assist in the development of employees by finding out their talents and weakness
4. to select candidates for special training
Ranking - the oldest and simplest system of formal systematic rating is to compare one person
with all others for purpose of placing them in a simple rank order of worth. In doing this, the appraiser
considers person and performance as an entity; no attempt is made to systematically fractionize what
is being appraised into component elements.
Grading - in the grading system, certain categories of worth are established in advance and
carefully defined. For example, there may be three categories of personnel; outstanding, satisfactory
and unsatisfactory. Employee’s performance is then compared with these grades definitions and the
person is allocated to the grade that best describes his or her performance.
Checklists - to reduce the burden upon the appraisal a checklist system can be utilized. The rater
does not evaluate employee performance; it is merely reported. The evaluation of the worth of reported
behavior is accomplished by the staff personnel department.
Forced- choice description - one of the fundamental objectives of the forced choice approach is
to reduce or eliminate the possibility of rater bias by forcing a choice between descriptive statements
of seemingly equal worth.
Behaviorally anchored rating scales - there are two types 1. Behavior expectation scales (BES)
where anchors are illustrations that help the rater to define as superior average or below average the
behavior of the employees and 2. Behavior observation scales (BOS) where the rater reports the
frequency with which the employees engages in the behavior specified in the anchor
360*0degree appraisal -this is a technique of appraisals wherein multiple rates are avoided in
evaluating performance. This is understood as a systematic collection of performance data on an
individual group, derived from a number of stakeholders.
Managers are mostly appraised results, but results alone cannot reflect performance because it is still
affected by many other factors (Bowels and Coates, 1993)
The problem faced by organization experiencing some difficulties was measuring performance and the
extra demands made on manager
Morale
Job satisfaction
System factors
Previous experience
Purpose
Quality of work
Design
Execution
Outcomes
According to the conceptual model, we are assuming that human factors will be correctly estimated by
the selected appraisal method. So for that the hypothesis will be;
H0: Human factors will not be able to accurately estimate the post placement performance of
an employee
Hi: Human factors will be able to accurately estimate the post placement performance of an
employee
*According to the conceptual model, we are assuming that system factors will be correctly estimated
by the selected appraisal method. So for that the hypothesis will be;
H0: System factors will not be able to accurately estimate the post placement performance of an
employee
Hi: System factors will be able to accurately estimate the post placement performance of an
employee
3. Methodology
A questionnaire is going to administrated to obtain data for the purpose of analysis from the company
Job satisfaction
Salary level
Personal development
Quality of work
Submission of project
proposal
Review of literature
Administer
questionnaire
Final collection of
questionnaire
Data analysis
4.References
Works Cited
http://www.employeequestionnaire.net/employee-performance-questionnaire.html
http://www.performance-appraisal.com/methods.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/17320747/Sample-Research-Proposal
Bibliography
CS ,Venkataratnem. BK Srivastava ,2006, Personnel Management and Human resource
Management, 14 ed, 7 West Patel Nagar, New Delhi 110 008.
Mick Marchington and Adrian Wilkinson, 2005, Human resource management at work, 3rded,
charted institute of personnel and development.
5. Appendixes
Questionnaire
1. How do you and your supervisor evaluate your skills , experience, pay and results as a whole?
2. How do you and your supervisor assess your salary relative to your performance?
3. How would you consider your overall performance of the job?
A) High level B) Average level C) Low level
4. Do you have an appraise system in your organization? Yes No
5. If yes, what is the system of appraisal adopted by your company?
6. How often are appraisals carried out in your organization?
A) Quarterly
B) Half yearly
C) Annually
D) Others (please specify)
7. What are the criteria used in your company to evaluate an employee?
A) Performance
B) Technical Competence
C) Attendance
D) Quality of output
E) Customer focus
F) Target Vs. Achievement
G) Key results area
8. What is the rating system used in your company?
A) Scoring
B) Comments
C) Both
9. Do you obtain feedback on the person being appraised?
A) Yes
B) No