Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INFOLIB
A PEER-REVIEWED QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF
JHARKHAND INFORMATION & LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
Abstract
Library plays very important role in generating and organizing new information as well as providing recorded
information available in documentary and other forms. These records reflect the scholarly and creative efforts
of civilization as well as its social & historical interactions. Libraries are the repositories for the record of cultural
existence. They are gift of the past from the past to the future, collected in the hope of that we have thought created
discovered will be pleasure and assistance for the coming generations. The preservation of these valuable & fragile
materials is the responsibility of the care taker of the same. One of the greatest tragedies which can trap a library is
disaster. Disaster is an unforeseen event causing great loss, upset or unpleasantness of whatever kind. A decision
to undertake disaster planning is one of the most important which a librarian should take at right time to protect the
collections. Damage caused by disaster can be prevented or reduced by proper planning and disaster management.
The inadequate protection against disaster is jeopardizing the culture of the society and the future generation..This
paper briefly describes about concept, feature, need, types, literature review, tools, Technology applied, plans of
disaster management, issues and precautions, disaster management data bases etc. It is an attempt to touch base
with all the areas relating to disaster management of libraries and information centers in simple language.
Key Words : Disaster management, Disaster management in libraries and information Centers, Disaster, Tools,
Preservation.
Disaster
Natural Human-made
Geological
Sociolosical
Hydrological
Technological
Climatic & atmospheric
Wildfire
2. Publication Pattern
250
225
200
175
150
No. of Publishers
125
100
75
50
25
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Year
Figure 3.j(i): Publication Pattern of Stars research in India during 1960-2014. From
the period 1960-1972, no publication appeared in the WoS database.
250
y = 0.0004x4 - 3.459x3 + 10335x2 - 1E+07x + 7E+09
225 R² = 0.9799
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Figure 3.j(ii): Growth Trend of Stars research in India during 1960-2014.Blue dot
describes the distribution of publications (observed value) and Red dashed line
describes the correlation of distribution of publications where regression coefficient
R² = 0.979
4000
3500
3000
No. of Citations/TYear
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Year
Figure 3.j(iii): Citation Pattern of Stars research in India during 1960-2014. From
1960-1972, no citation received as no publication appeared in the WoS database.
260 5000
240
4500
220
4000
200
No. of Publications/TYear
180 3500
No. of Citations/TYear
160 3000
140
2500
120
100 2000
80 1500
60
1000
40
500
20
0 0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Year
Table 3.j(iv): Top institutions on Stars research and their research impact, 1960- 2014
SNIP = Source Normalized Impact per Paper; on Stars have been contributed by 8617 authors. Table
3.j (vi) shows the top 20 productive authors during the
Source: WoS and SCOPUS
last 54 years, 1960-2014. Top 20 productive authors
7. Top Authors and their research impact are ranked based on the decreasing productivity of total
publications. Sagar, R. has produced maximum number
A total of 2656 publications included the author addresses
of publications i.e. 93 which accounts for 3.50% of total
having India as the country of affiliation. Publications
publications and ranks 1st followed by Paul, B., Ashok, N. M., Lambert, D. L., Ojha, D. K. who ranked 2nd, 3rd, 4th
and 5th respectively.
Table 3.j(vi): Top Authors of Stars research and their research impact, 1960-2014
9. Collaboration Pattern and research impact: with Indian institutions involved in the stellar research.
Countries Out of the 2656 papers, 113 (4.8%) papers appeared
in India’s own publications without international
A total of 2656 publications included author address,
collaboration and the remaining 2242 (95.20%)
source country and research institutes. There were 72
appeared with international collaboration.
collaborating Countries/territories which collaborated
Table 3.j(vii): Country wise Collaboration Pattern and research impact of Stars research
Atmospheres 94 0.79 16
value, t n − t0 : number of years (Compound annual
growth rate, n.d.).
Novae 80 0.67 17
The CAGR provides smoothed growth rates free from
Late-type 66 0.56 18 the annual fluctuations of keywords occurrences during
Gamma-ray burst 59 0.50 19 the study period. Table 3.g(ix) lists the top keywords
according to the CAGR and sorted them by their rank.
Chemically peculiar 36 0.30 20 The ranks in Table 3.g(ix) show that ‘Supernovae’ and
NO: Number of time occurrences; R : rank ‘Emission’ and ‘Pulsars’ are three leading hot issues
that continue to attract broad attention. ‘Supernovae’
Source: WoS kept its dominance in terms of total quantity and CAGR
(0.158%).
Table 3.j(ix): Top Quick rising themes in Stars research
Figure 3.j(vi): Evolution of top most used keyword in Stars Research during 1960-2014
Abstract
The present paper discusses the innovative approach of the researcher to introduce Yoga and Pranayam for LIS
professionals of India in particular and entire world in general to lead a stress free life and healthy. It is a mantra
for the present day life style of busy professionals who don’t have time to even spend few hours for their own
health and well being. Life is so fast and people are engaged in so many official assignments,personal and family
responsibilities where people hardly gets time to do gym, yoga and pranayam and mediations to keep themselves
fit, healthy and rejuvenated. The mechanized life make the people face many health problems in even early age and
having so many complications, ailments which leads to the early appearance of the sign of aging or aging process. In
the backdrop of above, the paper proposes to introduce yoga and pranaymain daily routine of the LIS professionals
who are working under tremendous pressure and stress to provide the library and information services in changing
digital environment where the users demands and expectations from the LIS professionals are high and they want
instant information for the academic and research activities and day to requirements. The second part of the paper
deals with the basic concept of yoga and proanayam along with various ashanas and benefits derived out of it. In
the last part of the paper the role of INFLIBNET, Library Associations and academic, public an special libraries in
introducing and adopting the novel concept of yoga and pranayams amongst the LIS professionals to keep them
stress free and healthy.
Key Words : Yoga,Pranayams, LIS Professionals, INFLIBNET, Library Associations, Academic Libraries, Public
Libraries, Special Libraries, Life Style Diseases
Table.6 shows that Users satisfaction on University its collections keeping in mind the information needs
library performance. This is found on the bases of of users and library should designed their services as
above given table users satisfaction on University per users changing expectations as well as information
library overall performance. However, only 11(5.5%) changing landscape. This study revealed that majority of
users were not satisfied with library opening and closing students are visiting library regularly and their foremost
time. This indicated that users are highly satisfied with purpose is study, followed by searching online resources
University library overall performance. and research work. This study also revealed that users
are more satisfied with library’s overall resources and
Summary of Findings
services.
The findings of the survey are as follows:
References
More male 130(65%) users uses library than the
1. Andaleeb, S. S., & Simmonds, P. L. (1998).
female 70(35%) users.
Explaining user satisfaction with academic
110(55%) Post-graduate students uses library libraries: strategic implications. College & Research
regularly, whereas,only 91(45%) Undergraduate Libraries, 59(2), 156-167.
students uses library regularly.
2. Simmonds, P. L., & Andaleeb, S. S. (2001). Usage
Regarding frequency of library visits, 91(46.5%) of academic libraries: Role of service. Library
visit regularly, 65(32.5%) twice in a week and Trends, 49(4), 626-34.
23(11.5%) once in a month, 14(7%) twice in a
3. Wells, J. (1995). The influence of library usage
month and 5(2.5%) never.
on undergraduate academic success. Australian
Majority of users uses library for study purpose Academic & Research Libraries, 26(2), 121-128.
91(45%), searching of online resources 40(20%)
4. Ball, R. (2008). User satisfaction: the key to a library’s
and research work 38(19%).
success. Biblioteka-klucz do sukcesuużytkowników
Study revealed that users were more satisfied with eInstytutuInformacjiNaukowejiBibliotekoznawstwa,
library and its overall resources and services and nr 5), 5-14.
overall performance.
5. Ijiekhuamhen, O. P., Aghojare, B., & Ferdinand, O.
Conclusion A. (2015). Assess Users’ satisfaction on Academic
Library Performance: A Study. International Journal
University libraries are investing cores of rupees every
of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(5), 67-77.
year for the collection development in order to meet the
information needs of users. In order to get the most out 6. Hiller, S. (2001). Assessing Users’ needs,
of the use of library resources, every library must build satisfaction, and Library Performance at the
200
No. of Articles
150
100
48
50 10 1 2
0
Single Two Three Four Five Six
Author Authors Authors Authors Authors Authors
Authorship Pattern
Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
Number of Authors 3.50 1.871 6
Number of Publications 86.83 113.330 6
Correlations
Number of Authors Number of Publications
110
96 90
No. of Articles
60 55
49
18 22
8 2 4 4 0 1 0 0 1 1
No. of
S:No Designation Cumulative Percentage Cum %
Contributors
1 Librarians 305 305 35.46% 35.46%
2 Research Scholars 189 494 21.98% 57.44%
3 Assistant Librarians 104 598 12.09% 69.53%
4 Professors 77 675 8.96% 78.49%
5 Assistant Professors 72 747 8.37% 86.86%
6 Associate Professors 43 790 5.00% 97.86%
7 Lectures 20 810 2.33% 94.19%
8 Deputy Librarians 18 828 2.09% 96.28%
9 Resource Officers 18 846 2.09% 98.37%
10 Students 14 860 1.63% 100%
Total 860 100%
(Sources: Primary data)
Table 4 and Fig. 3 show the designation -wise distribution of authors. The maximum number of authors (305) is
Librarians followed by Research Scholars (189), Assistant Librarians (104), Professors (77), Assistant Professors
(72) and Associate Professors (43). The least number of authors are the students with just 14 articles. It is a
good sign to note that next to librarians, research scholars are more in numbers in contributing articles in ELSRJ.
..
..
t..
..
s
te
ce
ch
nt
s
n
es
so
..
an
nt
ia
cia
ty
ur
ta
ar
ur
es
de
r
ist
pu
ra
sis
so
so
se
ct
of
s
u
Lib
De
Re
Re
As
As
As
Le
Pr
St
Designations
No. of
S:No Prolific Authors Percentage Rank
Contribution
1 B. Devendra Patel 12 7.44 % I
2 Manpreet Singh 12 7.44 % I
3 Sangita Gupta 09 5.59 % II
Year Single CAI Two CAI More than Two CAI Total
Author Authors Authors
2013 49 109.24 55 184.82 10 16.32 114
2014 96 304.21 90 164.18 24 21.26 210
2015 60 202.68 110 213.91 27 25.50 197
Total 205 255 61 521
Table 4.23 and Fig. 4.20 show that the CAI of single authors shows an oscillation which indicates that the
domination of solo research keeps fluctuating. But the CAI of two authors increased from 184.82 in 2013 to
213.91 in 2015 which conveys that the LIS researchers prefer to work jointly with another professional. The
CAI of more than two authors increased from 16.32 in 2013 to 25.50 in 2015 indicating the preference of LIS
researchers to work in small teams.
184.82 164.18
200
150 109.24
100 21.26 25.5
50 16.32
0
SA TA MTA SA TA MTA SA TA MTA
∑ j j fj
A No (NS) (NM) + NS
=1 tion (DC)
DC Value
1.5 1.44
1
2013
0.5 2014
0 2015
2013
2014
2015
Year
3rd half
1
4th half
0.5
5th half
0 6th half
1st half 2nd half 3rd half 4th half 5th half 6th half
Half- Yearly Periods
NM +
S:No Quarter Period Single (NS) Multiple (MS) DC
NS
2013
1 1st Q January – March 08 06 14 2.33
2 2nd Q April – June 11 13 24 1.85
3 3rd Q July – September 14 22 36 1.64
4 4th Q October – December 16 24 40 1.67
2014
5 5th Q January – March 25 26 51 1.96
6 6th Q April – June 31 30 61 2.03
7 7th Q July – September 28 37 65 1.76
8 8th Q October – December 12 21 33 1.57
2015
9 9th Q January – March 15 34 49 1.44
10 10th Q April – June 20 39 59 1.51
11 11th Q July – September 18 29 47 1.62
12 12th Q October – December 07 35 42 1.20
Total 205 316 521
(Sources: Primary data)
Table 11 shows the computed values of the degree of collaboration for the articles published in ELSRJ during
2013-2015 with Subramaniam’s formula. The degree of collaboration was maximum (2.33) in 1st Quarter i.e.
January-March, 2013 and the least degree of collaboration (1.20) was found in 12th Quarter i.e. October-
December, 2015. The degree of collaboration showed an increasing trend from 3rd quarter to 6th quarter and
from 9th quarter to 11th quarter. During other quarters, we could see fluctuations in collaborative research.
Conclusion authors from India may collaborate with the authors of
other countries to produce productive articles.
The study has given rise the following suggestions from
the researchers as concluding remarks. Authors may References
be encouraged to form small research groups in every
1. Akhtar & Fatima, Nishat. (2011). A bibliometric
institution / area/ city / inter-city / inter-institution spaces
analysis of the ‘Chinese Librarianship: an
to collaborate in producing research output. Special
International Electronic Journal, (2006-2010)’.
funds may be provided for the projects to be undertaken
Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic
by small research teams apart from individual research
Journal, 31. URL: http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31HF.
projects. More research scholars and students may
pdf.
be motivated to write journal articles. The senior LIS
professionals may help the budding students / research 2. Barik, N., & Jena, P. (2013). Bibliometric Analysis
scholars in writing quality articles. The University may of Journal of Knowledge Management Practice,
give some incentives for the students who publish 2008-2012. Library Philosophy and Practice
articles with good impact factor. The authors may be (e-Journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.
motivated to contribute their original thinking and unl.edu/libphilprac/1020
creativity in producing journal articles and by which their
3. Chandran, V. (2013). Research Trends in Journal of
Dominant Factor will improve. The LIS professionals or
Intellectual Property Rights ( JIPR): A Bibliometric
students of various foreign countries may be given some
Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
special columns / space for publishing their articles. The
Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
VOL. 9, NO. 3-4, Sept. - Dec. 2016 INFOLIB - 43
libphilprac/1043 14. Pareek, S. (2013). A Bibliometric analysis of the
literature of IFLA Journal during 2001-2010. Library
4. Das, T. K. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of
Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal). Retrieved
contributions in the journal “Library Trends.” Library
from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/954
Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal). Retrieved from
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1014 15. Rabindra, K. M., & Das, A. K. (2013). Bibliometric
Analysis Of Malaysian Journal Of Library And
5. Edewor, N. (2013). An Analysis of a Nigerian Library
Information Science (Mjlis) During 2007-2011.
and Information Science Journal: A Bibliometric
E-Library Science Research Journal, 1(10).
Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice
Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
(e-Journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.
unl.edu/libphilprac/1004 16. Ramasamy, K (2012). Numbers too count…
Quantities too Qualify: A bibliometric study of
6. Gudodagi, S. C., & Manjunatha. (2014). PEARL
D-Lib Magazine – An online Journal in LIS Arena
- A Journal of Library and Information Science: A
(2008-2011). Proceedings of the National Seminar
Bibliometric Study. E-Library Science Research
on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Annamalai
Journal, 2(11). Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
Univeristy, March 9-10, 2012, Chidambaram,
7. Kumar, Manoj and Moorthy, A L. (2011). Tamilnadu, 176-181.
Bibliometric Analysis of DESIDOC Journal of
17. Tamilselvi, (2012). A bibliometric analysis of the
Library and Information Technology during 2001-
Journal of librarianship and information science
2010. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information
during 2007-2011. Proceedings of the National
Technology, Vol. 31, No. 3, May 2011, pp. 203-208
Seminar on Scientometrics and Informetrics,
8. Maharana, R.K., & Das, A. K. (2013). Bibliometric Annamalai Univeristy, March 9-10, 2012,
Analysis of Malaysian Journal of Library and Chidambaram, Tamilnadu, 295-300.
Information Science (Mjlis) During 2007-2011.
18. Thanuskodi, S. (2010a). Bibliometric analysis of the
E-Library Scince Research Journal, 1(10).
journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-
Retrieved from http://www.lsrj.in
2009. Library Philosophy and Practice, October
9. Maity, A., & Teli, S. (2015). The Malaysian Journal 2010. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2012, from http://www.
of Library and Information Science 2010-2014: A webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/thanuskodi-lpp.htm
Bibliometric Study. E-Library Science Research
19. Thanuskodi, S. (2011). Library Herald Journal:
Journal, 3(7). Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
A Bibliometric Study. International Refereed
10. Mamdapur, G. M. N., Rajgoli, I. U., & Chavan, S. Research Journal, 2(4). Retrieved from www.
M. (2014). Bibliometric Portrait of SRELS Journal researchersworld.com
of Information Management for the Period 2004-
20. Thanuskodi, S. (2014). Bibliometric Analysis of
2013. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
D-Lib Magazine. e-Library Science Research
Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
Journal, 2(6). Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
libphilprac/1166
21. Verma, A., Sonkar, S. K., & Gupta, V. (2015). A
11. Padma, P., & Ramasamy, K. (2013). Numbers give
Bibliometric Study of the Library Philosophy and
a galore of information : A bibliometric study of
Practice (E-Journal) For the Period 2005-2014.
‘Journal of Information Literacy 2007-2012’. Library
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal).
progress (International), 33(1), 245-262.
Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
12. Padma, P., & Ramasamy, K. (2015). The Malaysian libphilprac/1292
Journal of Library and Information Science 2007-
22. Watti, U. K., & Tiwari, B. (2013). SRELS Journal
2012: A Bibliometric Study. e-Library Science
of Information Management (2006-2011): A
Research Journal, 3(9). Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
Bibliometric Study. e-Library Science Research
13. Pandita, R. (2014). DESIDOC Journal of Library Journal, 1(9). Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
and Information Technology (DJLIT): A Bibliometric
Study (2003-12). Library Philosophy and Practice
(e-Journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.
unl.edu/libphilprac/1038
Table.1 shows the demographic profiles of respondents To prepare for next class 17 6.54
with number and percentage. The findings show that Photocopy 13 5
100% respondents were female. The table demonstrated
that the more than (50%) of the respondents were age Total 260 100
ranges between 16-20 age group 73(54.89%) followed Table.3 reveals that the purpose of using library by the
by 21-25 age group 57(42.86%) and 26-30 age group respondents. The finding show that 53(20.38%) of the
3(2.26%). Further above table.1 indicates education respondents visit library to study, to issue and return
level of respondents that Under-graduates 85(63.91%) the books 41(15.77%), to access electronic resources
while Post-graduates 39(29.32%) and PhD 9(6.77%). 38(14.62%) to consult reference books 31(11.92%)
The findings of study also pointed out that more than the and to get reference service 28(10.38%). Whereas, to
50% respondents were from the age ranges between read newspapers/magazines 25(9.62%) followed by
16-20 age group 73(54.89%) whereas, majority of to prepare for next class 17(6.54%), to complete class
respondents education level were Under-graduate assignment 15(5.77%) and photocopying 13(5%). From
85(63.91%). the findings it seems that the purpose of library visits
Frequency of Library Visits by the students for various reasons. Students visit
library mostly to study 53(20.38%), to issue and return
Table.2 Frequency of Visits the books 41(15.77%), to access electronic resources
38(14.62%) and to consult reference books 31(11.92%).
Library visit Frequency %
Library Resources Used by the Students
Daily 47 35.34
Table.4 Library Resources
Weekly 23 17.29
Twice or thrice a week 36 27.07 Resources Frequency %
Table.2 shows frequency of library visit by the Students Electronic resources 38 15.90
and their frequency and percentage.47(35.34%) of the Total 239 100
respondents agreed that they visit library daily, while
36(27.07%) stated they visit library twice or thrice Library resources regularly used by the respondents
followed by others.
Library Overall Performance measured by the Students
Table.6 Library Overall Performance
Abstract
The paper analyses 14030 publications of the scientists of the G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and
Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, India. Chronological distribution of publications during 1989 –
2008 has been carried out. Annual growth rate percentage has been calculated by subtracting the previous year data
from current year data, divided by previous year data and multiplied by 100. Form-wise distribution of productivity of
scientists has been derived. Ranking of journals preferred for publishing by the scientists has been drawn.
Key Words : Research Productivity, Himalayan Environment Scientists, G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment
and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, India
The Table – 1 displays the year-wise distribution of total depicts that on an average in the decade 1989-1998,
research output of the Institute scientists right from there were 54 papers per year as compared to 89
inception of the Institute (1989) to 2008. A total of 1430 per year during the decade 1999-2008. The highest
research publications have been found as per scanning numbers of papers were published in the year 2002
of the annual reports of the Institute from 1989 to 2008. (114 papers).
It is pertinent to mention here that Gupta and Gupta [1]
The study reveals that during the period of 20 years
recorded 289 total papers of the scientists of the G.B.
publication output of the Institute scientists rose
Pant Institute scanning the database of SCOPUS for
significantly. In the first decade the publication grown
the period from 2004 to 2013 and isolated second rank
by nine (9) times from 11 papers in 1989 to 99 in
to the G.B. Pant Institute out of the total (4867) Indian
1998. In the second decade the publication grown with
publication on Himalayan R &D by 30 most productive
fluctuating growth.
Indian organizations in Himalayan R & D. It is observed
that the output of publications of the Institute Scientists The study also reveals that the number of papers
has grown steadily during the period of study from 11 in produced each year varies widely. No definite inference
1989 to 90 in 2008. The overall increase in the number can be drawn from such variation. The minimum number
of papers published each year reflects the increasing of papers during the early years, however, can definitely
Research and Development efforts. be correlated with a very small number of research
workers and activities relating to preparatory phase of
It was revealed from the decade-wise study (Table – 1)
research work and establishment of infrastructure which
that maximum number of research papers published in
is natural for any organization. As many as 114 papers
a year (during the first decade 1989-98) was 99 in the
in the year 2002 of the study only can be correlated
year 1998. During the second decade (1999-2008) the
with overall increase in research activities and number
publication figured 114 in the year 2002 which is the
of researchers.
maximum number of publications in a year.
2 Annual Growth Rate : The trend of annual
The total number of research publications of Institute
growth rate and average growth rate of papers
Scientists was 541 at the end of the first decade and
published during 1989 to 2008 by the researchers
1430 at the end of the second decade. In the second
of the Institute is revealed from Table – 2.
decade total publication figured (1430-541 = 889). It
Sandip B. Khandare
Research Scholar
DLIS, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University,
Aurangabad (Maharashtra), India
E-mail – sandipkhandare89@gmail.com
Abstract
Present paper focused on awareness and use of Whatsapp among participants of the LIS refresher course organized
by UGC – HRDC MaharshiDayanandSaraswati University, Ajmer. Its includes experience, frequency, purpose of
Whatsapp use, use of Whatsappresearch work, effect of Whatsapp at working place, influence of Whatsapp usage
on academic efficiency, satisfaction with the Whatsapp, advantagesof Whatsapp Messenger.Out of 41 (100%)
participants 28 (68.29%) were using Whatsapp.
Key Words : Social Networking Sites, Whatsapp, LIS Professionals, Refresher Course, UGC – HRDC
MaharshiDayanandSaraswati University, Ajmer
35
30 25
25
17.86
20 14.29
15
7.14
10
0
Since its introduction Less than 1 year 1-2 Years 2-3 Years More than 3 Years
ds
rs
n
k
e..
en
ew
r
io
io
S-
be
wo
en
ar
at
at
m
eM
n
em
sh
fri
m
m
in
ic
nt
ar
m
r
ta
To
ith
m
rre
fo
fo
sh
de
In
in
te
ily
w
cu
a
To
En
te
ch
l
Ac
ra
ng
fa
da
u
ne
to
tti
ith
to
Ge
Ge
in
up
t
ay
ge
g
tin
ep
St
To
at
Ke
Ch
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
...
..
...
..
...
...
ks
n.
p.
tio
ed
ed
ed
ch
lin
ou
io
ar
at
at
at
c
at
es
ra
gr
se
l
l
re
re
re
rm
te
sit
re
n
ch
in
ei
fo
b
rc
rc
ith
we
ea
l
in
at
na
ea
ea
w
cip
ul
ul
sio
s
s
re
h
re
re
ef
ef
r ti
uc
g
es
us
us
in
Pa
to
in
in
of
g
nd
g
ar
ar
Pr
in
in
in
Se
Sh
Sh
ar
ar
ay
Sh
Sh
St
Respondents
Branch Associate
Professor Asst. Prof. Total
Professor
Chemical Engineering 7 13 22 42 (14.14%)
Civil Engineering 8 17 21 46 (15.49%)
Computer Sc Engg & IT 4 13 30 47 (15.82%)
Electrical Engineering 12 17 27 56 (18.86%)
Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering 5 19 31 55 (18.52%)
Mechanical Engineering 8 11 32 51 (17.17%)
Grand Total 44 (14.82%) 90 (30.30%) 163 (54.88%) 297 (100%)
1 Almost daily 44 14.82 The analysis of data Table-4 reveals that out of 297
respondents, maximum numbers of respondents i.e.
Thrice in a 126(42.43%) were spending 6-10 hours per week in
2 60 20.20 library, followed by 108(36.36%) were spending less
week
than 5 hours and 35(11.78%) were spending 11-15
Twice in a
3 95 31.99 hours in library per week. Further 15(5.05%) and 10
week
(3.37%) numbers of respondents were spending 16-
Once in a 20 hours and 21-25 hours in the library respectively.
4 39 13.13
week Surprisingly only 3 users were using the library more
than 25 hours which is 1.01%.
5 Monthly 26 8.75
Purpose of library visit
6 When feel 33 11.11 Regarding purposing of visiting library by the
respondents ,the analysis of Table-5 depicts that out of
Grand Total 297 100.00 805 responses , maximum i.e. 230 (28.57%) responses
indicated that the main purpose of visiting the library was
Time spend by the respondents per week for accessing the subscribed e-resources, followed by
to issue/return of books (19.88%), for reading purposes
The study further attempts to examine the average
(14.66%), to use CDs/DVDs (13.54%),to browse
time spend by the respondents per week and the data
Internet (12.42%), others( 8.57%) and for research
collected on this were tabulated in Table-4.
work( 2.36%).
Table-5 Purpose of library visit
Further the Table-5 examines various purpose of responses out of 19 indicated that Associate Professors
library visit category wise. It shows that for reading visit library more than Asst. Professors(36.84%) and
propose, Asst. Professors visit library more(87 Professors(10.53%).
responses out of 118 i.e.73.73%) ,followed by Associate
Also the less numbers of responses on the purpose
Professors(16.10%) and Professors(10.17%).The same
of library visit for research work by the respondents
is in the case of other purposes of Library visit such as to
indicated towards poor research activities of the faculty
issue/return of books (61.88% out of 160 responses),to
members of the private Engineering colleges of Odisha
use CDs/DVDs(44.96% out of 109 responses),to
browse Internet(66% out of 100 responses) ,to access Satisfaction with various library facilities
subscribed e-resources(51.30% out of 118 responses)
To evaluate satisfaction level of respondents on various
and for other purposes(49.28% out of 69 responses)
aspects of library, the respondents were asked to grade
like preparation of class note, writing research papers
various aspects of library such as physical faciltities,
etc.
collections, rules and regulations etc and the collected
However for research work, as high as 52.63% of data have been tabulated in Table-6.
Electronic Theses/Dissertations/
8 Yes 130 43.78
Institutional Repository
# 6 14 23 43 14.48
Highly satisfied
% 13.95 32.56 53.49 100
# 12 24 37 73 24.58
Satisfied
% 16.44 32.88 50.68 100
# 19 36 65 120 40.40
Moderately satisfied
% 15.83 30.00 54.17 100
# 4 7 25 36 12.12
Dissatisfied
% 11.11 19.44 69.45 100
# 3 9 13 25 8.42
Highly dissatisfied
% 12.00 36.00 52.00 100
Total 44 90 163 297 100.00
It shows that the overall satisfaction level of respondents 6 Frequent power 142 18.35
were “Moderately Satisfied” with 40.40% of response, cut
followed by satisfied (24.58%) and highly satisfied
(14.48%).Also 8.42% of response indicated that the Total 774 100.00
respondents were “Highly dissatisfied” and 12.12.% The analysis of data of above table shows that “Lack
were “Dissatisfied”. Further category wise also the of time” was the main problem for using library
response of respondents were “Moderately satisfied” resources(25.58%), followed by unavailability of
Problems encountered in using library resources required resources(22.09%) and frequent power
cut(18.35%).Surprisingly 7.62% of responses indicated
Table-10 reveals about the problems encountered by
that the problem for using library resources was the
the faculty members of the private engineering colleges
“non-cooperative library staff”
Odisha. Out of that 120(15.50%) are dissatisfied by the
inconvenient library hours. Findings of the Study
Table-10: Problem encountered in using library The findings of the study can be summarized as follows.
resources a) Maximum numbers of Private engineering colleges
S. Problems # of Percentage exist in Khurda district of Odisha. It is due to the
No Respondents (%) fact that since the state capital “Bhubaneswar”
comes under Khurda district, maximum private
1 Inconvenient 120 15.51 engineering institutions have been established in
library hours and around Bhubaneswar.
2 Lack of time 198 25.58
b) The frequency of library visit of maximum
3 Required 171 22.09 respondents visit library twice in a week ,which
resources are is also less than 50% of the total numbers of
not available respondents. Also average time spend by faculty
4 Library 84 10.85 members for library visit is 6-10 hours per week. It
environment is indicate poor library use by the faculty members of
not good these institutions
5 Non-co- 59 7.62 c) The main purposes of library visit by respondents are
operative library for accessing the subscribed e-resources, followed
staff by to issue/return of books (19.88%), for reading