INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: REY MARK M. LOTUSQUEN Name of Rater: LORELINA G. MORERA

Position: TEACHER I - ABM Position: HEAD TEACHER VI / FOCAL PERSON SHS
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SDOQC Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2018-2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALU

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 4 3
Services Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was
Pedagogy content within Showed Showed Showed Showed shown
and across knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
curriculum content and its content and its content and its content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across and across and across and across
subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV evidence was
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable 4 3
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
numeracy skills as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
4 learner- learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was
centered lessons lessons as lessons as lessons as shown
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the other
and supported by supported by any supported by any given MOV
any 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
 shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in any of the other
and supported by supported by any supported by any given MOV
any 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable 5 4
Services Knowledge and range of teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown
strategies to develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other and/or other and/or other and/or other
as other higher 7.5% HOTS as shown HOTS as shown HOTS as shown HOTS as shown
order thinking Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
skills. 4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as evidence was
evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the other given
supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
Timeliness Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality management management management management No acceptable 5 4
Services Environment classroom strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was
and Diversity of structure to engage learners engage learners engage learners engage learners shown
Learners engage in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks
learners, as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
individually or in 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
groups, in 7.5% 7
Submitted 6
at least Submitted 3 5
Submitted 2 4
meanigful Efficiency 4 lessons lessons lessons Submitted 1 No acceptable
exploration, supported by supported by supported by lesson supported evidence was
discovery and MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 by any of the shown
hands-on of the other of the other of the other acceptable MOV
activities within acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
a range of Timeliness
Basic Education physical
5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 4
Services learning
learner behavior management management management management evidence was
environments.
constructively by strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of shown
applying positive learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
and non-violent that promote that promote that promote that promote
discipline to positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
ensure learning- violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
focused as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
environment 7.5% submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given 4 of the given 4 of the given of the given evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only
least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 lesson
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Applied (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied differentiated Applied Applied No acceptable 5 4
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated teaching differentiated differentiated evidence was
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies to teaching teaching shown
Learners appropriate strategies to address learner strategies to strategies to
learning address learner diversity as address learner address learner
experiences to diversity as shown in MOV 1 diversity as diversity as
address shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
learners’ gender, with a rating
Efficiency Submitted at of 7 Submitted 3
least with a rating
Submitted 2 of 5 with a rating
Submitted of 14
any No acceptable
needs, 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was
strengths, 7.5% teaching teaching teaching teaching strategy shown
interests and strategies in at strategies in at strategies in 2 in only 1 lesson
experiences. least 2 lessons least 2 lessons lessons as as evidently
as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by shown in any 1 of
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the acceptable
supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 5 4
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process learning process learning process learning process
learning as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
processes to 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
meet curriculum 7
Efficiency Submitted 6
at least Submitted 3 5
Submitted 2 4
Submitted 1 No acceptable
requirements 7.5% 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
and varied developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced shown
teaching sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
contexts. teaching and learning process learning process learning process
learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV
and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV
Timeliness given MOV
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 4 5
Services and Planning in collegial participated in participated in participated in participated in evidence was
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meeti LACs/FGDs/meeti LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ shown
use teacher and ngs to discuss ngs to discuss meetings to meeting to
learner teacher/learner teacher/learner discuss discuss
feedback to feedback to feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner
enrich teaching enrich instruction enrich instruction feedback to feedback to
practice. as shown in the as shown in the enrich instruction enrich instruction
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted as shown in the as shown in the
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meeti LACs/FGDs/meeti LAC/FGD/meetin evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meeti ngs as evidently ngs as evidently g as evidently shown
ngs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 4
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown
used learning learning learning learning
appropriate resources, resources, resources, resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
address learning Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable
goals. 7.5% 4 varied teaching varied teaching varied teaching teaching and evidence was
and learning and learning and learning learning resource, shown
resources, resources, resources, including ICT, as
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently shown
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown in any of the
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the 1 of the 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No acceptable 4 5
Services and Reporting selected, selected, selected, selected, selected, evidence was
organized and organized and organized and organized and organized and shown
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
formative and formative and formative and formative and formative and
summative summative summative summative summative
assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies strategies
consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
7.5%
requirements. requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
4 varied varied varied assessment tool evidence was
assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools as evidently shown
as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in any of
shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the acceptable
the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable 5 4 4
Services and evaluated monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was
learner progress evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown
and progress and progress and progress and and achievement
achievement achievement achievement achievement using learner
using learner using learner using learner using learner attainment data
attainment data. attainment data attainment data attainment data as shown in the
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 5 4 4
Services and Reporting ted promptly showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was
and clearly the and clear and clear and clear communication of shown
learners’ needs, communication of communication of communication of the learners’
progress and the learners’ the learners’ the learners’ needs, progress
achievement to needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress and achievement
key and achievement and achievement and achievement to key
stakeholders, to key to key to key stakeholders,
including stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including parents/
parents/ 7.5% including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ guardians as
guardians. guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the
shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted a MOV submitted
Submitted a MOV submitted
Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable shown
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 4 4
Services various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was
works/activities related related related work/activities shown
that contribute work/activities work/activities work/activities that contribute to
to the teaching- that contribute to that contribute to that contribute to the teaching
learning the teaching the teaching the teaching learning process
process. 10% learning process learning process learning process as shown in the
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 different kinds different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable evidence was
of acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory REY MARK M. LOTUSQUEN LORELINA G. MORERA DIEGO M. AMID, Ph. D
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
ITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

LORELINA G. MORERA
HEAD TEACHER VI / FOCAL PERSON SHS

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Ave Score

3.500 0.262

3.500 0.262
Ave Score

4.500 0.337

4.500 0.337

4.000 0.300
Ave Score

4.500 0.337

4.500 0.337
Ave Score

4.500 0.337

4.500 0.337
Ave Score

4.500 0.337

4.333 0.324
 Ave Score

4.333 0.324

4.000 0.400

Very Satisfactory 4.231

DIEGO M. AMID, Ph. D
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: REY MARK M. LOTUSQUEN Name of Rater: LORELINA G. MORERA

Position: TEACHER I - ABM Position: HEAD TEACHER VI / FOCAL PERSON SHS
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SDOQC Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2018-2019

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 3 3.500 0.262
Objective 3 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 4 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 7 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
Objective 9 7.5% 5 4 4.500 0.337
Objective 10 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Objective 12 7.5% 5 4 4 4.333 0.324
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 4 4 4.000 0.400
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 4.231

REY MARK M. LOTUSQUEN LORELINA G. MORERA DIEGO M. AMID, Ph. D

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
, Ph. D
thority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FOR

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other
MOV given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action
conduct and application disseminated action research with
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the
research report research report
within the rating within the rating
period period

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
 Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3

more lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom
management of management management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
environments.environm Efficiency
ents. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
 Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the
differentiated, in the department or
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3

collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the
selection, organization, in the selection, selection,
development and use of organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3

teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative 7.5% submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indica
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective
progress and communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3

of the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently
Services related works/activities performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory 0
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
applications of applications of shown
content knowledge content knowledge
within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 6 of 5
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 from colleagues colleagues and
and supported by supported by any 1
any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

research with research with evidence was
colleagues colleagues shown

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

MOV MOV evidence was
shown
Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating shown
period period

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
 strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
well as other well as other
higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

lessons as as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and supported by any of
supported by any 1 the other MOV
of the other MOV given
given

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Modeled and Modeled and evidence was
shared effective shared effective shown
classroom classroom
management management
strategies that strategies that
engage learners inengage learners in
activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
done in different done in different
physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6with a rating of 5
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
and constructive and constructive evidence was
behavior behavior shown
management skills management skills
by applying positive by applying positive
and non-violent and non-violent
discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
 Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
lessons lesson

Worked with Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
with others with others

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable

lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV with others

Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies showing strategies showing shown
developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable

as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the other
acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborative collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as
evidenced by the evidenced by the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner learner feedback as
feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV
 Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
in the selection, selection, shown
organization, organization,
development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources
as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

reviewed collaboratively evidence was
collaboratively assessment tools shown
assessment tools with colleagues as
with colleagues as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
interpretation of assessment data
assessment data as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV shown

Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
effective communication of shown
communication of learner needs and
learner needs and progress to
progress to parents/ guardians
parents/ guardians as shown in the
as shown in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1

MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
tasks and/or assignments as shown
assignments as shown in the MOV
shown in the MOV submitted
submitted
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0 Approving Authority
Rater Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric

KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

0 0
Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

0 NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY

Rater Approving Authority