0

MANUAL TO THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION

A Worldview
for
Personal and Social Balance and Reformation
through
Moderation and Systemic Comprehension

By:
James H. Fox
 1

Parabellum

What follows is neither revelatory nor unique and is fragile in its written nature, which was
begun with an apocalyptic impatience and anxiety. What is to be read has already been said in
many different and often better ways in many different eras. In its whole, it is a forward, a notation
atop which standards and conduct might be built in this intermittent construction before death. To
‘best live’ as I see it, why, and what to overcome in accomplishing that are the goals of the
framework to follow in assembling oneself to develop a better society. Though it is composed
primarily to inform and aid the interests of white Americans, it may be useful for anyone who
lacks meaning, purpose, or motivation in the Modern Phenomenon of this global age. I can say
nothing more to preface the text except that my goal is organic optimization, not ‘goodness’ – it
seeks an intuitive, tempered honesty, not referential, labelable dogma.

_______________
 2

I
Cosmology

1. – Reality
1. How do we know what is real? Are we solipsistically alone, or are there phenomena
beyond us that can be proven? Can we find any reference point for appeal outside the self, or is
there a self at all, and are these even questions of pragmatic consequence, or is everything the false
vision of belief? Certainly, if any metaphysical resolution thus far had proven correct, the necessity
of asking would be negated . . .
Still, we must ask: what is the self, or what does the word ‘self’ correspond to in
experience? It is the thing that is experiencing – the ‘I’ faculty, the ‘mind’. Though we might
assume this self is bound by its relation to the body or its spaciotemporal familiarity, this is not
necessarily the case and these apparent circumstances could be illusionary. However, we can state
assuredly that even if this happening, this ‘right now’, is a dream, a simulation, a mirage of any
kind, there must be an originating cause or some housing condition – existence in the ether without
cause-and-effect is completely, incomprehensibly without precedent and unknowable. Though we
cannot absolutely prove what exactly is real outside the mind, the mind alone is not all that
constitutes reality since it, by necessity, must exist within some greater expanse, condition, or
stimuli, whether it is immediately perceptible or not. The trouble arises when we find that the self
is both an interpreter and a sensory organ, and separating the former form the latter is impossible,
leaving us unsure if the stimuli are internally projected or externally interacting.
2. No matter what deep inquiry we can muster to probe the behemoth, we are still using
human concepts to discern the non-human, even when it is our own minds. This inevitably leads
us to fallibility and subjectivity. And since we cannot fully know the entailment of reality’s
undeterminable essence, since existence is indelibly finite, we cannot have a ‘probability of 1’ that
it is authentic, and therefore we must relinquish that certain qualities are only the most real things
we can know outside the self. Time and space of the Universe, understood through limited sensory
understanding, are reality as far as we can guess and as far as human beings seem to act on.
Whether an ailment, a dream, a lack of sleep, a drug, a psychological incongruity, virtual
immersion, or other copious circumstances, doubt in the authenticity – the ‘true realness’ – of this
generally understood reality and our perception of it can manifest exponentially. Moreover, our
limited vantage, diluted memories, and the impossibility to absolutely communicate accurately all
compounds the issue impossibly further when viewed from the singular and only perspective that
is accessible. Reality is a Rorschach koan. So, in other words, we know what ‘real’ is, but it’s very
difficult to determine what is real.
2. – Truth
If reality is the ultimate measure of things, then intuition affords that it is also the rubric of
truth. By truth, we mean that one is lacking error in viewing reality. From that, truth is practically
unfathomable and unattainable, but nevertheless inherent to an objective interpretation of reality.
Not to mention that any assertions arguing against truth fundamentally assert a truth of their own,
therefore ensuring that some facts must exist. But the difficulty comes when we acknowledge that
individual human existence has so many observational stipulations that fully perceiving reality is
perceiving a dime through a mile of fog.
This is the inaugurating font from which all else flows: an objective but wholly unknowable
sense of reality and a sense of truth about phenomena within.
 3

3. – Structure of Reality
There seems to be a quasi-dualistic disposition to the commonly arcane reality in three capacities:
i. physical / abstract [info →(p. → a.)]
ii. existence / absence [life / death (Ø)]
iii. favorable / unfavorable [≈ like / dislike]
1. We say here that reality is bifurcated into ‘physical’ individual principles and ‘abstract’
group principles. These principles cannot practicably be defined apart from one another due to
their multi-leveled relationship, but are, ultimately, different once observed. Physical principles
are quintessential ‘building blocks’ that often can be derived from our senses and act as the
foundation through which abstractions can be formed. Abstract principles lie in entities that have
coalesced from physical components, regulating and using the physical to its advantage. As atoms
are to molecular bodies, so are they to cells, cells to tissue and organs, and organs to the body (to
form the mind), so too is a person to a family, a family to a community, a community to a province,
a province to a nation, and a nation to a confederacy. Abstractions are associations of physical
pieces to a greater organism – not inert labels but active collectives of many synchronized parts.
To summarize: abstracted groups form when physical, individual components are arranged into a
whole greater than their sum. This is accomplished through informationally-driven processes,
whether that information is encoded in genetics, or sought out in scientific equations, or politically
composed in laws, or in the ‘invisible hand’ of the market, etcetera.
2. ‘Existence’ and ‘absence’ are nearly synonymous with the terminology of ‘life’ and
‘death,’ but with present clarity mean something more. Existence refers to an adaptable presence
of being in reality – an entity that has dimensions in space and time and can actively respond and
adapt to perceived stimuli. Absence, therefore, is simply the lack or loss of existence;
nonexistence, or the slumbering Ø that predicates all life and antecedes its end. Existence is the
bracketed, inserted exception to page after page of absence. Existence is subject, absence is object,
leading to fallibility in the former and infallibility in the latter. Furthermore, life is fallible because
it does not always choose the rational, ‘right’, or expected due to an imperfect understanding of
itself and its environment. Existence cannot escape its genetic and environmental programing, but
it is not fully bound in every deed by it, just as one is free to move within expansive parameters.
Our choices are our own, directed by conditions beyond our control or awareness.
3. Lastly, we approach a byproduct of existence: the ‘favorable’ and ‘unfavorable’, which
are estimations and beliefs about reality which span practically anything possible to disagree about.
The favorable are ‘good’, agreeable judgements while the unfavorable are ‘bad’, disagreeable
judgements. They are useful explanations or extrapolations of reality, or personal convictions,
feelings, and hopes, or what does or does not feel acceptable, or any opinions diverged by positive
and negative personal or cultural preference. They form most every iota of experience and are
inherently separate from truth, no matter how improbably difficult or naïve it may seem to suggest
such. If reality is unknowable in full because it cannot be fully experienced by the limited reach of
our senses from the mind, then we must acknowledge the spiritual essence of existence as the
favorable-unfavorable dynamic attests to a grab in the lack of light. They are not observations
about the dark but values placed on shadows.
4. Natural Law
1. This sense of reality can be reduced to subroutines of informationally-driven processes
that insentiently, indifferently, and practically unreally guides physical components to abstract
ones, existence from and to absence, and sanctions for the abyss between the favorable and
unfavorable. Reality itself might be called ‘the highest possible abstraction’, of which everything
 4

is a piece of and is orchestrated by. Everything, large and small, is influencing everything else it’s
a part of, large or small, and the echoes of tiny events from the distant past still resonate. The flux
and omnipresent change of things is, in actuality, systematically ordered by cause and effect in the
quasi-duality. Reality has a perceived chaos to it only because we cannot understand the whole –
with a complete understanding, all would seem simple and orderly, even entropy. This is what
‘natural law’ holds: that there are permanent and inescapable conditions which analytically
methodic inquiry corroborates, but which are innately available to those who recognize the trends
of the given system. They are conditions or ‘rules’ to which there are no exceptions.
Nothing as it is in any given moment will prolong forever, and yet it’s effect on other
phenomenon will never not be visible – nothing will remain, everything has been retained. “For
every action, there is an equal, opposite reaction”: yin and yang. This is the quasi-duality, meaning
that the asserted triple-dyad is in fact a singular-monad but can only be rationalized when its
constituent elements are disjoined. ‘The Great Abstract Equation in the Sky’ organically balances
itself. It is the Gnostic logos, the Taoist tao, and the Hindu brahman, always influencing. The laws
of humanity and attempts at justice only apply to us, but natural laws apply above and below.
2. One characteristic of natural law is the ‘authority of ferocity’: the ability of something
to dominate another. The favorable of a ‘stronger’, larger, or denser abstract (one with more
energetic physical components and adaptive informational programming) will always possess the
potential to overcome the favorable of a weaker, numerically less abstract, even bringing it to
absence. The ultimate arbiter of violent force is indomitably owned by the mighty over the feeble,
creating a gravitating supremacy and a proclivity to monopolize the environment to their ends.
Though we might expect or hope for there to be some semblance of sacred justice, there is only
what the strong allow the weak to possess. A crucial observation underscoring this assertion is that
if a body of individuals seeks to overcome a strong individual or group, they too partake in the
authority of ferocity to achieve their dominance over their oppressors.
3. Another characteristic to natural law is the universal proclivity for abstractions to
achieve and maintain a salubrious balance. The orchestrating forces are deducible by how extremes
are mediated to find an optimized level of energy consumption to prevent unnecessary entropy. It
is paramount for the organism/abstraction/system to safeguard itself against impulsive urges,
overreactions, or underperformance, which always lead to downfall and a state of absence. The
‘moderating principle’ solves this by expending dormant energy in an unsustainable scenario to
course-correct into stability. All stronger individuals grow old and frail, all systems inevitably
collapse, and the evolution of the environment tests for different abilities. However, if the
informational component of an abstraction is devised by humans, it becomes much more reliant
on artificial and imperfect conditions that stem from a favorable perspective over one that is solely
looking to transplant natural law into human affairs.
5. Human Nature
Partaking in this species, deep within the bounds of the quasi-duality, we should take a
moment to meditate on what it means to be a human being. In the present examination, we will
attempt to avoid dishonestly exalting or lessening our neutral selves by imposing human preference
on bits of human nature to somehow titivate our animality. Human nature is not clean or favorable
– nor is it inherently flawed. It is what it is.
1. Homo sapiens are a social animal, replete with a complex clan-dynamic. This communal
orchestration is the abstract aggregation of mankind, such as a single ant is nothing, but a colony
is a buzzing network of neurons working toward a single goal in their several individual goals, and
a single personality through their many. The human group mentality is significant in that it
 5

provides the individual with a community of assistance, an outlet of cooperative competition

within, and an outlet of hostile competition externally to other clans. It gives us something greater
than ourselves to work toward as the physical component of an abstract and creates a support
network when needed.
2. Humanity is emotional as well as logical, concerned with a temperament of sentimental
feelings and an intellect of pattern-seeking reason. This is often misconstrued as some hierarchy
to ‘better’, electrical logic and ‘base’, chemical emotions, with those characterizing the former
being overall wiser, more moral, and more human. This is folly. Pure logic and pure emotions can
deduce or feelingly extrapolate anything from anything and turn everything into nothing – it is the
true indicator that a majority of reality is fabricated by what we favor or disfavor. Pure logic and
pure emotion can disappear us into the magician’s hat and reappear us as a rabbit. Acknowledging
their unified influence on every thought is paramount for comprehending human nature.
3. Humanity desires fulfilling purpose within the awareness of existence. To be conscious
of one’s mortality, possess the language to articulate it, and the dexterous body to fulfill it leads
us to explore, invent, imagine, and inquire about reality and our place in it. This desire for purpose
typically expresses itself in a sense of interpersonal heroism, or inward advancement, even in very
mundane endeavors. Both a heroic individual purpose and a conformed place and identity with the
group work together, flowing from our social nature – we are physical and abstract at once and
seek purpose from both.
4. Our species is heavily enamored by convenience, homeostasis, the ‘path of least
resistance’, and whatever is easiest to achieve. Most people are followers, some are organizers,
but very few are leaders, able to initiate action and command their own desires. Whims and
biological urgings drive behavior, and innovations only exist to create more convenience and ease.
5. Humanity is divided into two genders, two entities that complement one another as
differently calibrated sexual counterparts. Male (penis) and female (vagina) are biological
constructs, which means that they have distinct, though not radically differing, mindsets since
chromosomes control sexual biology and influence the brain, the latter integral in forming the
abstract mind. Therefore, having a penis or vagina indicates that genetics have synchronized your
mind with the respective sexual organ and complimentary testosterone or estrogen. Masculinity
and femininity are both biologically and socially determined, meaning each have degrees and
overlaps in definition depending on the given culture and individual. Anything other than male-
to-female attraction or non-male masculinity and non-female femininity are statistical anomalies,
because the proliferation of the species would have been impossible otherwise. Any non-normative
sexual affiliation or preference suggests that the individual likely has some hormone or
neurological imbalance.
6. Humanity is divided into many varying ethnic and racial groups. Having been isolated
from one another for thousands of generations, with vastly different climates and geographic
demands and opportunities, each of the major races can be genetically and phenotypically
differentiated. These differences derive from environmental natural selection, leading to different
demographical medians in mental and corporal matters and, in turn, to wildly different cultural
values and interests. Homophily naturally insulates similarly predisposed people together but does
not necessarily exclude minor alterations or enjoyment of different cultural norms as long as the
differences maintain their own, distinct spheres.

_______________
 6

II
Morality

1. – Moral Criteria
From the above cosmological commencement, we can deduce apropos behavior in
accordance with the forces that play on our essence, avoiding ideas that would attempt to mold
behavior into an artificial rhythm that benefits things other than existence through
misunderstanding natural law and human nature. By that, what we seek is natural and optimal –
kathekon – dissimilar from conventional, ideal, or merely practical.
The self is set at the opening of an endless rabbit-hole, siphoning down through strata of
sutured cognizance and participation in reality: the quasi-duality, human nature, and that personal
core within. These are the three forces of condition that sway and orient how and why we act: an
objective but indecipherable reality, (the expanse of truth in the Universe) the hard forces at play
in human nature, (not only a being in existence, but one partaking in a shared, inherited genetic
programming) and the time, space, and individuality of personal experience (unique expressions
and inclinations of individual humanity). How can one’s actions meet this standard to generate the
most realized existence? What kind of behavior do the ‘threefold sways’ promote?
2. – Moderation
Firstly, the moderating principle of natural law applies throughout reality. As adapted
specifically for human beings, this means consciously placing oneself in an even-handed position
between extremes and seeking a perfect center. Moderation in the context of natural law is not an
inherently willing effort, but for human beings it means balancing between too much and too little
so that one avoids a neglectful underdevelopment or a distracted overdevelopment. This is done
by reeling-in our favorable and unfavorable and find the center of what we want, what we need,
and what we do not want. That median center, that compelling force, is termed ‘virtue’,
unachievable in full, (like practically everything discussed thus far) but which can be touched,
glimpsed at, and temporarily manifested or embodied to some extent. The seemingly relativistic,
personal call to ‘moderate oneself’ is transformed into a method to the universal when it is ushered
by virtue. This approach respects and is applicable anyone, being the ultimate rejoinder of
absolutism and relativity.
Moderation is key to experiencing our humanity without neglecting unfavorable aspects of
it, while avoiding inhumane diligence, always within real bounds of behavior, still benefiting the
individual and society without placation or reward. It’s not about forbidding our inclinations, but
actively directing them through a tempered self-control and informed restraint. Neither is the idea
about moderating this-or-that given action but moderating the abstract overall with respect to an
equilibrium of the quasi-duality. Similarly, virtue does not mean only one mode of thought, or
only one path – there is no path, there is only an open country of choices, with some leading to
mountain peaks and valley ponds, and others to lion dens and swamps. Moderation acts as a
signpost.
2. – Bio-Historical Ethics
While individual moderation fulfills the criteria of the threefold sways, the human nature
encourages inter-personal non-aggression as a specific expression of moderation for reasons
grounded in anthropology.
1. Since humanity has a very social prerogative and a higher degree of intelligent
consciousness than other species, it’s fitting that our personal conduct would be more distinctly
 7

complex from the animal kingdom; more than just a karmic exchange of ‘if I’m polite, the other
person will be too; if I input x, I’ll get y’. Homo sapiens evolved a self-interested concept of moral
behavior in accordance with our clan mentality, differing from culture to culture, but typically
comprised of beneficial behavior within the given clan, and a sort of passive indifference or active
antagonism to other clans – ‘in’ and ‘out’ standards. To receive goodwill, we must give it, but to
give it, we’re more willing if we have first received it.
‘Non-aggression’, that is, not acting hostilely toward someone unless they act so first, is
the basis of all voluntary interactions. The idea that most anything (encompassing thought, speech,
and action) should be allowed unless is infringes on the ability of another to do the same or
jeopardizes the survival of the group at-large which facilitates the individual’s ability to exist, is
the principle of biological human morality. Along with this, individuals formulate their own semi-
unique etiquette based off cultural norms of the ‘in-group’, but most people would admit to
involuntarily flowing into the day-to-day behavior of moral economics, expecting reciprocity.
3. – Inadequacies of Other Assumed Systems
1. Causing and deriving from civilization, this non-aggression became more solely
altruistic, (benefiting another at personal expense) most often represented as charitable almsgiving
or sacrificing oneself for a stranger – identification of the social abstraction and fellow physical
component’s well-being with one’s duty. Many, if not most, surviving religious systems advocate
for assistance of the disenfranchised this way and, furthermore, abstractions emphasize altruism
due to its simplicity and systemic benefit.
Even though helping others is an intricately inclined parts of human morality, it is
inadequate as a comprehensive mandate. Even though self-sacrifice and subordination are the
keystone of civilized order and social cohesion, it does not apply to all peoples in all scenarios,
particularly when the individual is disconnected from a group and alone. Some forms of altruistic
thought also ignore that you must kill to live; you must repurpose other energy into a usable form
for yourself to survive. If we do not kill, we accept absence – whether from a lack of defense or a
lack of food. Similarly, we cannot reduce morality to legalism by adhering to pervasive regimes
of codified commandments issued from a place of authority or from formulae. Experience in the
world exemplifies their usefulness, but not their total accuracy. Is it always wrong to lie? Is it
always wrong to kill? What about lying to save a hidden family, or killing to protect yourself or
your group? . . . Ah, then it’s only generally unfavorable.
2. And as for the skeptically relative positions that hold existence as amoral or morality as
meaningless, we can state that they inaccurately view morality from only one of the three-fold
sways: reality. These positions argue that, to the Universe and the metaphysical agnosticism about
it, there can be no basis to act any certain way. This logic totally foregoes the values evolved in
human nature, which esteem behavior devoted to the end of personal and social wellbeing and
purpose. Therefore, though these sentiments aid us by approaching existence from an angle
opposed to convention and restraint, they ultimately hold little innate moral value in-and-of-
themselves. Whether or not personal and social ends hold any eternal or objective significance,
they do hold a genetically irremovable one.
3. Lastly, we must address the position which holds the authority of ferocity as being the
only honest standard. Though this characteristic of natural law is in accordance with all known
phenomenon, there is always human fallibility that makes it untenable as a universal behavioral
standard. For whereas the owl preying on mice moderates the ecosystem by weeding out
unsuccessful genes and preventing overpopulation, or whereas the bickering of wolves or
chimpanzees tests and affirms social cohesion, the authority of ferocity for human beings is
 8

plagued by conscious desires apart from the organic impetus of breeding or eating. And though
self-interest should never be denounced, one’s interests are often not so visible, such as one thin
sheet of paper held up the light exposes seemingly random lines, but when holding up other sheets
with it, back-to-back, the full image emerges. The mighty and those who seize power are frequently
fixated not with balancing the physical and abstract, but only with the exaltation of their favorable
or with some misguided assessment of how to influence, and therefore, this standard is susceptible
to an unfavorable moderation against the monopoly by other physical actors in the system, thus
diminishing real power.
Whatever form the individual takes, wherever they are, whenever their historical station,
whatever they believe, and whatever choice they’re presented with, there is still behavior that
effectually and ineffectually benefits one’s existence – moderation and non-aggression. The notion
of ‘moderation striving for virtue’ meets the above criteria and answers the issues posed against
assumed systems by seeking balance from the forces of condition and harmony in our
undertakings.
5. – Inherently Iniquitous Acts
While existence necessitates pain and an eventual absence, these are integral aspects of life
and therefore they should not be found as inherently unfavorable. Existence, however, is still
singular, and we must be able to respect the irreversibility of absence in ourselves and in others.
From that, there are some actions that compromise the sovereignty of other life, inflicting a degree
of pain or death that is always unnecessary in how they show a vacuous lack of moderation or
dishonesty to the nature of individual human life in reality. Rape, (forceful sexual intercourse
without consent or with those who cannot understand consent) genocide, (indiscriminately
destroying an entire group of life) and intentional infidelity (flouting promises/oaths/agreements)
are the primary examples of universal acts of objectively wrong conduct for all humanity for all
time; most everything else is dependent on the circumstances. They cannot be justified, for they
are always impulsive, aggressive, or an overreaction, choosing a convenient solution to a complex
problem.
6. – Human Virtues
I will now elucidate five principle virtues that I believe encapsulate my intent with natural,
moral elevation, knowing that their deepest personal meaning cannot be transcribed. They are
derived from knowledge and attentiveness to all threefold sways, not forceful obligation. We do
not need a flow-chart or a manual to understand and cultivate virtue. What we need is vigorous
kindling, the fuel to burn, and the vigilance to stoke and maintain.
1. To be ‘honest’ means to align oneself with the truth in all its forms. That we admit to
who we are and what we actually think and feel. This does not mean we prohibit
favorable/unfavorable opinions from forming, but that we acknowledge they are subjective
byproducts of existence. Honesty includes being trustworthy to oneself as much as others – to be
worthy of trust by maintaining truth and not betraying reality. Respecting which of the threefold
sways we reference will aid us tremendously in achieving this virtue. To be honest, overall, is to
not overvalue and impose yourself onto everything, but to accept and promulgate what is actually
there – to ‘take things as they are’, with tactful, fiduciary intent, not personally.
2. To have ‘goodwill’ means that you prevent needless suffering and will act to help others
when vital. Some suffering is useful, and sometimes helping others would be counterproductive to
your interests and theirs. Nevertheless, to be kind in non-aggression is deeply, unalterably
ingrained in our species, which does not need to be personally acknowledged to feel disposed to.
That which you save, somehow saves you. Yet it follows that we must accept whatever happens
 9

to anyone anywhere in the world because we have the capacity to act for any cause or any life –
so what we choose not to act for, we concede whatever consequences occur. If a homeless person
goes cold, or a child is raped, or a species goes extinct, we must accept it as though we chose so,
because we did not act against it with all our will.
3. To have ‘strength’ is to possess physical and mental fortitude. That one is trained body
and mind through exercise and education is supreme for the individual in many capacities, most
notably that you can defend yourself at the town hall and campus as much as the street and bar.
This is absolutely in accordance with the authority of ferocity understood in conjunction with the
moderating principle. As opposed to it being synonymous simply with being best equipped to
survive, mate, and possess power, strength, as a moderated virtue, means that one suppresses
flaunting it at every encounter. The strong possess a stoic discipline in daily maintenance of
physique and psyche so as to be prepared for the challenges of life. If we somehow did strive with
every moment to help but were somehow prevented, we must accept that we performed to the best
of our ability. Failing is no great loss if we did everything we could have – it is the ardent attempt
at eschewing weakness that matters most. Furthermore, vulnerability and having flaws are not
weakness. Weakness is cowardly hiding a moral, psychological, physical, or temperamental failing
without resolving it. Overall, learned posture and patience are worth more than good birth and
deliverance – this is strength.
4. ‘Autonomy’ is related to strength, just as all virtues are refracted echoes of other virtues,
(all branches of a single tree) but its uniqueness is demarcated as reliance on oneself, unbridled by
social whims. Our social nature is strong, inclining towards community, but it does not
fundamentally entail the sacrifice of oneself for the clan – the reformation of the abstract mind into
nothing more than a physical component of the social abstract. It is not arrogant self-sufficiency,
it is quietly proclaiming that power over you is determined by you. Independent invincibility.
Autonomy is there to determine how one behaves, how one believes, and how one benefits from
one’s own existence; being comfortable and poised in oneself. Each of us are separate from every
classification other than the eternal ‘me’. We’ve spent millions of years evolving the self-image
for many reasons – let us not wantonly disregard it for favorable feelings.
5. To have ‘humor’ is a complex thing, for the meaning I intend certainly isn’t a comedian’s
career, nor the laughing of friends, nor even the most innocent giggle of a slobbering infant.
Humor, by my meaning, is to be amused by the nonsensical fabric of existence and not sew our
lives too seriously atop it. That one can ‘make fun’ of oneself and discover a new dimension to
reality that embraces the absurdity of all existence. Between extemporaneous, cackling insanity
and dour gravity. Virtuous humor also includes the ability to engage in playful banter without
taking it as an insult.
_______________
 10

III
The Modern Phenomenon

By applying what’s been laid out thus far, we can adequately critique and prescribe a
remedy to the ‘Modern Phenomenon’ of Western Civilization’s current cultural affair in this and
the following parts. Specifically, for this third part, we will look at how people are brought
together, the ideas that come with that, how civilization and its accoutrements expand and
influence them, how democracy augments these aspects further, and how this Modern
Phenomenon is prodigiously expressed and overlorded by an elite few through these conduits. This
exploration will be significantly longer and more in-depth than the preceding parts because it’s
more difficult to convince someone through explanation that what they favor is inorganic or
nonoptimal, or that the view of reality they have been trained to is actually opposed to them.
1. – Social Existence
1. As previously noted, and to reiterate a vital point for this part: humanity has a
predisposition to coopt themselves, through our ingrained ‘clan mentality,’ into a collective
abstraction – a systemically conditioned, segmented organism of social orchestration with its own
identity and personality (culture). Unlike most other lifeforms or anything of absence, humanity
actively assembles the specifics of how their informational clan mentality is expressed and in what
scale. How the colors of a group’s genetics are expressed on the canvas of their environment will
determine how they form laws and customs and how it evolves from one generation to the next.
Human social abstractions give benefits for those who coopt themselves, but the individual does
not exist for the abstraction nor the abstraction for the individual – they use and benefit one another,
influencing identity and drive through ideas.
2. Obliquely, the most sovereign group one can be a part of, outside the personal mind, is
being in a unique relationship with someone, which here is defined as being one of two physical
components, where agreed barriers, outlined or unspoken, are the driving informational
component, and where emotional experiences sustain or destroy fondness. Love is an
immeasurably strong connection between two individuals and ‘romantic love’ only adds sexual
attraction to that. Hate, then, is a barrier to collectivization between people due to some inability
to work together. Similarly, war is a sorting-out of those barriers between group-abstractions, just
as a fight between two people is a metaphysical resolution to an issue otherwise unsolvable. People
liken love with peace and hate with war, but this is not always the case for sometimes love of one’s
friends can cause one to fight for them, and mutual hate of an enemy can unite people. Though
love is ultimately stronger than hate, pure hate is much simpler to achieve and more energetic than
pure love and is therefore found more plentily. Both are necessary and human, and both serve their
own purpose and drive.
2. – Ideas and Identity
1. When an abstract attempts to describe something, they form ideas, which are intangible
mental representations, interpretations, or classifications of reality through construal imagination.
An idea is something someone has thought about the world and is able to share. Identity means
self-definition, or the ideas an abstract has about itself, whether that abstraction is a single human
or a collective unit. But when referring specifically to the ides and identity that a group has about
itself, we call it ‘culture’, and a history of culture, ‘heritage’. The only way to actually understand
a culture or idea is to understand the language the abstract uses to expresses its ideas, whether that
language is a special lingo or a completely different tongue. Without considering why and how
 11

their language is utilized, you will never be able to step into their ideas, their beliefs, and their own
unique concepts of the world.
2. The success and longevity of an idea or culture are not aleatoric whatsoever and are
reliant on a limber adaptability if it is to have a long-term host. In a very economic, epidemiological
sense: it must somehow be appealing to some demographic and present itself to them. If it has an
air of use or fashion about it, it might be circulated around an abstraction of relative proportion to
its aim or acceptability. If it’s passed around, we’ll find mildly different iterations depending on
person or sub-group. If the use or fashion begins to decline, the idea will adapt or fail as a successor
moves in, countering the reigning standards. And so on into oblivion as a million new ideas
compete in a vast agora for acceptance. However, the irony of success is a loss of the initially
accepted identity through familiarized entrainment – when an idea succeeds, it changes its memetic
environment and evolves out of the initial circumstances from which it originally emerged.
Without fluidity, the idea gradually fades, but with adaptations come a continual metamorphosis
that changes the original hue, recycling preexisting themes or affixing neologisms to similar
motifs, rather than originality or a new archetype – institutionalizing what was new and stifling
behavior into that mold. The sanctity of any idea, institution, or group will always develop to
wallowing in the sins it abhors given enough time due to diluting itself for mass-acceptance or
becoming fundamental and hostile to opposition.
3. – Counterfeit Spiritualities
These inherently flawed ideas can be expounded and tooled to create systems of thought
that fulfill mankind’s innate desire for place and purpose within reality, (spirituality) yet
communicate and justify immoderation, thus weakening the abstract. They are contemptable in
that they cause and reassure addiction: unrealizing helplessness in the ultimate immoderation.
These counterfeit spiritual systems, which proport place and purpose conflicting with the threefold
sways, can only really permeate any era in two main forms: Dogmatism and Consumerism –
related to one another.
1. Dogmatism means transforming the favorable or unfavorable beyond truth. Instead of
incorporating ideas into their life, the dogmatist’s life becomes the idea – instead of acting
symbiotically, the idea acts parasitically. It is not that dogmatism is meant to imply an unfavorable
view of belief or conviction, (having beliefs does not make one dogmatic) but dogmatism is a
perversion of belief in its unmoderated absolutism. The mark of an exceptional competitor is the
ability to acknowledge the opponent’s humanity, for everyone works toward their own interests,
and should hope for their opponent’s testing talent. But dogmatists do not seek competition – they
seek monopoly.
A dogmatist can be incredibly rational, amiable, and consistent within the frame of their
ideology, but since their identity is so bound to that conception, (I am this or that) cognitive
dissonance affects data outside that frame from tampering with their phenotypic metric. The
dogmatist is bound by their terminology, beliefs, and rules – the keystones of their mental prison,
which they see as their free self. Anyone can become dogmatic about anything, including what
I’ve written. Being close-minded about open-mindedness as a necessity. Being immoderately
moderated. Enslaved to the need for freedom. Asserting the truth of relativity. These too are
dogmatic, despite their well-intended or ‘free-thinking’ concept.
2. Consumerism is not synonymous with capitalism, as is generally assumed, but is defined
by attending to the most gluttonous of our innate instincts. It fashions an egocentric virtue out of
owning. It beckons in nude form, sprawled, lithe, and supplicating for more. More. Newer, sleeker,
faster, more powerful, trendier, more expensive and expansive – the boundless want. We become
 12

internally valiant in purchasing, investing, and selling. Creation through consumption – digesting
someone else’s handiwork is seen as expanding oneself and a legitimate foundation for identity.
This is not to hold that owning property is unfavorable, but that immoderated ownership can erode
one’s identity to be nothing more than that property, or to become the property of someone else.
To take part in consumerism means more than the products one is sold, but the ideas that
accompany them. When you desire objects, when you desire fame, when you desire security or
comfort, even when you desire longer life, you bind your identity to things that can be taken away.
We attach our identity to things outside the self when we have somehow put forth our time or our
livelihood to possess whatever it is – we see a part of our lives within some physical object. By
believing a lessened idea of personal identity, if we were deprived of material goods or dogmatic
assumptions of life, many would need to redefine everything. Consumerism advertises, allures,
and affixes a value to meaning and happiness. Without this thing, this product, this state of being,
you cannot be content, and therefore you endeavor to possess it by selling your time and energy at
a given price.
4. – Civilization
The history of civilization is interwoven with the history of technology. Civilization seeks
security, technology seeks convenience. Together, they afford the other the resources and
population to progress in either.
As a population grows, power becomes communicated more exclusively through the
authority of ferocity rather than mutual respect, and different classes emerge that are absent from
tribal society. A climate for agriculture and the ability (spiritual, violent, sustenant, economic,
etcetera) to coerce family or tribal groups together allows those able to expand into more
permanent, sedentary infrastructure. And whereas in the natural world it is only the stronger, wiser,
or somehow better adapted abstraction which can dominate and reproduce, within civilized
parameters survival is seen as certain because the institution requires a large population of subjects
to maintain itself and will impede natural culling as much as possible, thus the individual sees their
absence as unlikely since their existence is bound to all those around them – the more people there
are, the less work the individual has to do. An abundance of resources renders the need for
competition and well-trained progeny unnecessary and reverts the greatest predator species into a
population of prey. In that way, civilization, particularly industrial society, permits the propagation
of undesirable genes by allowing those lacking in intelligence or adaptable stamina to reproduce
for strength in numbers.
5. Industrial Democracy
1. Civilization artificially selects for more docile and civil individuals, encouraging
domestication through less aggressive genes, or at least moving aggressive characters out of the
common pool and into a military caste that benefits the state. So when two societies compete
through war, it is more often the more brutal or more able to endure, that achieves victory. In the
collapse that follows, the militaristic, aggressive genes are purposefully removed from the defeated
pool and often the women raped, impregnated, and taken as slaves so that the defeated society
never recovers. It was only after the Black Death that this seemingly endless cycle began to shift,
for in the catastrophe of European decimation, the need for interdependence among the masses,
military class, and aristocracy became something that assured a much more civil society. The
necessity of cooperation rather than hierarchical command was greater than it had ever been before
for Europeans, and so the seeds that would germinate and blossom into liberty, a free market, and
other democratic virtues, were unconsciously planted. The level of civility necessary for them on
a large-scale was only possible with a massive genetic upheaval that selected for traits more
 13

disposed to those ends. That Europe was more isolated and ignored from invaders allowed this to
carry on through their colonial period and fueled the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and
modern democracy.
By granting political franchisement to a swath of the populace, democracy allowed the lack
of inherent eugenics in civilization to become unbalanced. When the populace constantly
contributes culturally, they will permit the perpetuation of the normal, weak values keeping them
alive – namely: non-violence/altruism, justice, and equality. Thus they begin to feel comfortable
ad vindicated in their lack of autonomy and strength. This expansion of timid normality will always
overtake postured honor and balanced virtue because the latter qualities require hardened
individuality to command and master, which many people do not have the patience or constitution
for without effort that is steadily deemed needless. Tolerance of the out-group or immoderated
expansion of the in-group creates a more ‘multicultural’ environment, where the foundational
values, that allowed for an attractive enough opportunity to entice separate peoples to want to join,
are buried and a new way begins to evolve.
Eventually, the amount of people adapted to take care of their own survival becomes so
minute, and the amount of self-sacrifice needed so great, that a few will steadily realize that they
can get away with doing nothing for the abstraction because there are enough others who are
willing to bear slivers of that sacrifice in their stead. As they get away with it, many others follow
suit until only a few are upholding the entire order. Democracy breeds individual weakness and
weakness breeds the mentality of a leech.
2. For the industrial form of civilization, there is a sort of dogmatism in the illusion that
people acceptingly place their faith in when they consent to money’s established value, the
guarantee of necessities’ availability, and the hegemony of the government/abstraction’s desires
over the individual’s alleged ‘rights’. As long as you follow its ordinances, preserve the kinetic
operations it depends on, and accept the illusion, civilization will provide for you, protect you, and
carry you from cradle to grave without major risk. Every society and abstraction in general must
interpret reality in a certain way to keep it operating smoothly and without major upset – this even
means willingly accepting lies and purposefully hiding truths lest the people want dramatic change.
Civilization deliberately upholds an illusion so that its institutions will survive, and since most
people understand that their survival is dependent on those institutions, they uphold it as well.
Serve a role, don’t impede progress, and accept that illusion. Civilization, relying on the
authority of institutions, is an idea that manifests itself when people accept it. But if those
manifestations falter, if the agreed-upon value of money became inconsequential or the store
shelves were no longer stocked, the illusion would give way to more practical community-based
enterprises. Over its numerous iterations, civilizations have adapted to this failing by accounting
for two important things. Since human nature refuses to prompt action unless provoked by massive
distress, groups will never act against the civilized order, which supplies comfort and opinion
outlets, and which the majority considers critical to their happiness; in fact, they cannot imagine
life without civilization, particularly the industrial and democratic kind. Existence loses all value
to many people when the Universe ignores their favorable.
6. – Media
1. The primary font of false spiritualities in the Modern phenomenon is ‘the media’ in that
it spreads the consumeristic dogma that a technological, multicultural civilization requires to
survive by dissolving reality into a digestible slop to encourage mass-acceptance. Film, music,
radio, television, the tabloid infotainment of news, and television sports comprise what we mean
by media – typically screen-based, aural entertainment. The conglomerated entity of these
 14

phenomenon promotes base urgings because they can be easily mass-produced without needing
quality in the craft and because people everywhere will buy it. The message is comprised of the
things universally common to humanity, which are easily exploited and communicated: lust, fear,
(of exclusion, death, inadequacy, etcetera) violence, the desire for a ‘better life’, convenience,
tolerant equality, etcetera. The institutional media does not plan on articulating realistic depictions,
nuanced debate, or exegetical understanding, for that requires a long, thoughtful process which is
expensive, cannot be mass-marketed, and does not factionalize into ardent buyers.
For the luggenpresse, everything is to keep us watching, not to tell truth. This is a simple
task, since the vast majority of people will only believe what or who they’re regularly exposed to,
forming repetitive consumption cycles. Many times, the exposure takes the form of subliminal
visual cues and auditory fnords that are carefully crafted to manipulate perception. The stories that
are told, how they are told, who tells them, and the expounded values all drive predetermined
responses after the consumption. The media, then, is conditioning propaganda that molds the
individual into scripted behavior and responses by bestowing a specific favorable-unfavorable
dichotomy – though a constant, theatrical posture, the media trains people to a certain point-of-
view that benefits their ends of repeated patronage.
2. Whereas before, we learned what culture and ideas were acceptable from interaction in
the community, who were informed by heritage and experience, now that community is only
informed by media, placing all behavior within the bounds of conformity to what it decides to
favor or disfavor. Sharing skills becomes sharing media; sharing memories, life-experience, and
wisdom becomes sharing media and its relation to the teller’s life. This process can distort reality
for the individual by giving them false input or by attempting to shame them for not being part of
the group, hijacking human desires for acceptance and success in the group abstraction. So the
individual is encouraged to accept what they are expected to believe, regardless of if that belief is
rebellious, for it is still enveloped by corporate production. Furthermore, the average person’s
identity is transposed onto them from the outside, not internally developed so as to aid the ever-
evolving ideal of conformity. This is why most people believe themselves informed on matters
they have no knowledge of outside the vantage the Modern Phenomenon supplies. Because, for
social survival, they deem the outlets’ interpretation adequate, whether or not they’ve visited a
publicized region, spoken with like-minded people, researched relevant statistics, etcetera. They
simply learn to believe it and believe themselves all the wiser for adopting the opinions of
condoned authorities.
When you realize that moderation is impossible to sell on the aggregate, it comes as no
surprise the media doesn’t advertise it. Our attention span, our memory, our sense of self, and the
integrity of our sense organs are all totaled at the cost of this standard of living. Entranced by
babbling, dancing splendor, our eyes and ears bask in an endless cacophony of artificial input that
deteriorates them throughout our lives, giving us an illustration of perfection that is irreconcilable
with an imperfect species and self. In the gratuitous moment, we’re befuddled but ignore it. In the
long run, our value of reality is lessened.
3. As a recent configuration of the same phenomenon, social media adds a new component
by allowing the whole populace to actively interact in the media-cycle. It teaches that one can find
fulfilling attention by exaggerating oneself, by parading opinions on fads, by brazen ostentation,
and by avoiding ill-will to one’s profile. Individuals meticulously groom an idea of themselves for
others to view and value, but all-the-while we are only attempting to hide our flaws by exalting a
false identity – something that is impossible to maintain for long when real-world meetings and
communication are our only interactions. Flanderization, rather than multifaceted, human nuance
 15

suddenly becomes the norm through its salability. And as we gather into flattering, sheltered
groups, locking the digital door behind us, we’ll never discover that these conditions have
needlessly, triflingly factionalized us so that no one discovers the truth, but only their favorable.
Sequestering ourselves encourages dogmatism, and sulking internet enablers amplify this in a
manner bordering on the cultish.
7. – Degeneration
1. The above encourages the rapid expansion of what it otherwise a necessarily minority
fringe-element. ‘Degeneration’ is an imbalance that is opposed to social unity, cohesion, and
identity, and which rejects moderation, human nature, and natural law in favor of self-gratifying,
immediate, or otherwise ‘easy’ pleasure. Degeneration instructs that people should do what makes
them feel good, that self-acceptance should domineer over self-improvement, and that immediate,
base urgings should be indulged and satisfied. It is a lowering of the cultural bar and an invitation
under it as the inherent limitations of social organization, ideas, civilization, and the dogmatism
and consumerism therein, are unleashed and unabated.
Without shame, there can be no honor. Without honor, there can be no virtue. Without
virtue, there is no strength in the individual. Without a strong individual, there cannot be a strong
group. And a weak group will inevitably collapse. Shame is the social balance between hedonistic
anarchy and totalitarian order, and the theme that runs the gauntlet of degenerate varieties is their
lack of shame, responsibility, and individual authority.
2. Material items or sensations are crucial to enjoyment or discontent to any degenerate. It
is as if pleasure is the greatest good and pain an absolute evil – wanton, animality without remorse.
An outward, quantitative, perfected homeostasis of eternal extent is always the ultimate goal,
typically expressed in very simplistic objectives: to accumulate wealth, to have sex, to get into an
altered state-of-mind, to be taken care of, to get famous, to get. When amassed together, every
racial slur and derogatory insult, every pejorative offence describes the same aposematic person:
emotionally-driven, a reflexive fixation on instant gratification, torpor laziness, insufferable
unwillingness to realistically visualize improvement of the current predicament, and no real moral
conception.
Vagueness plagues degenerates, forcing their subsistence on imprecision. They are always
able to tell you who or what to vilify or praise, (usually informed from media on an hourly basis,
but sometimes adapting it to their personal lives) but never why it should be or how it came about
or an be solved except in very simplistic, moralizing language that echoes the sentiments of infants:
‘It’s bad’, ‘It’s good’, or other synonymously implemented phrases. And when you inquire into it,
they are taken aback and become anxious about the solidity of the bedrock of their worldview,
which often spawns animosity toward the inquirer. They then project their insecurities and
weaknesses onto them, believing that everyone thinks similarly to themselves, since theirs is the
only mental orientation they know or understand or consider.
Degenerates do not understand the difference between favorable pleasure and true, inner
happiness. They do not want discussion, they do not want debate – they only want public approval
and victory. Their only power stems from their ability to manipulate other people, not from within;
and they cannot fit into the abstraction or be satisfied with their role – they must hold the group’s
attention. They fetishize marginalization and victimhood. Degenerates do not desire integration or
earned achievement but immediate success on their own terms. Their failures are always faulted
to an external source and their successes always stem entirely from within. They are represented
in every race, every gender, every creed and community, who debase others in their own image.
 16

They are not unique to any one label except in the behavior they chose and the authority of ferocity
they solely ascribe to.
3. Any and every abstraction always has fringe-elements that hold minority constitutions
or ideas, but they must never be allowed to have a larger representation in the group culture than
the majority. If a minority is allowed to roam the same territory as the majority, free and unabated,
the values of the majority will begin to disappear, degeneration will take root, and internal
upheaval will leave the entire social structure vulnerable and weakened. The issues that arise to
form this situation and supplant social balance are that: the majority takes itself for granted, is
amused by strange or foreign ideas, is constantly pulled by the fringes in every direction against
each’s opposite end, and that the fringe is concentrated and hyper-vocal to the extent that their
clear, incessant voice often drowns out the majority.
To combat the above, the majority must exercise its will consistently and thoroughly, never
ceasing by the thought that someone else will pick up the task for them or that the issue is a tolerant
step; for the greatest trial each civilization must undergo is how to change with each generation
while still retaining the original vigor. The best way to complete the trial is to seldom give in to
fringe-elements and minorities, and only after you have appealed to the majority that its own
interests are subverted – for every minority (fringe or otherwise) works only for its own interests
in a great invisible war for domination. The minority will always be more cohesive, as a group,
than the majority due to their tighter numbers, perceived oppression, and homogenized
circumstances. The majority will always be more individualistic due to their lack of collective
identity in the meritocratic swath, allowing the fringe-ideas to grow, particularly degenerate ones.
3. Evolution, balance, competition, harmony – these are mutated by the Modern
Phenomenon into degeneration and monopoly. By creating ideas of justice and equality of outcome
among the people, civilization steers them away from the rigors of reality. By overlaying comfort
and success as the norm, current culture replaces the Universe with fantasy: the Gnostic hypostasis
and the Hindu maya. It’s no wonder then that so many have succumbed to degeneration when they
have only ever known the world from the default worldview of media pop-culture. And even those
who believe they’ve found reality and hope to rebel against the system that has hidden it, only do
so from the engineered, acceptably castrated routes, all still removed from reality by many safe
degrees.
8. – The Defiled West
Now we’ll look at how a generalized sense of degeneracy expresses itself in specific
phenotypes when diagnosing Western Civilization. As previously stated, it is behavior that
determines a degenerate, but that behavior is regularly determined by genetic programming, which
can be cued through an individual’s constitution in relation to others with a similar make-up. In
other words, by aggregating subjective, individual experiences and opinions and corelating traits
and behavior, we can begin to view a more objective, universal existence for the species and for
groups therein.
1. Noted above, in regard to human nature, the geographical opportunities available to
different populations breeds differences over time, which form new ethnicities, which facilitates
culture, which influences individuals, who mold their environment in a feedback-loop. So it should
come as no surprise then that Europe, with a climate ideal for agriculture, with abundant resources,
near a body of water ideal for commerce, with pack and food animals in plenty, which experienced
dramatic, cyclical, seasonal shifts, which required strong group cohesion for hunting and seasonal
survival, and which was balkanized geographically by mountains and rivers and difficult to invade
 17

from the outside, would be an ideal place of intellectual, political, and military innovation and
competition.
The style or form of civilization that whites have created for themselves, that of the
European West, has its own values that find some overlap with other societies, but which are
uniquely expressed via the West’s heritage. A historical relationship of race and geography
culminated in Western Culture, which emphasizes honor, community cohesion/respect/aid,
heroism in warfare, nuclear family values, standards of work-ethic, and ideas of betterment and
improvement. If the people change, if the demography of the populace somehow abruptly shifts,
so too will the structure of the abstraction bend and crack – for these values and institutions do not
exist in the ether but are bound in and by the generational lays. And for three generations now, the
West has allowed demographic shifts in the hope of ‘bringing up’ less developed peoples and
utilizing their labor in the name of tolerance and multiculturism. However, the foundation of our
multicultural society would crumble if it was found that different races and cultures are not prone
to peacefully or equally exist together or that other races will innately encourage degeneration
within the bounds of white society.
2. When sub-Saharan Africa was ‘discovered’ by white European explorers, it was without
the wheel, without a calendar system, without written language, and shrouded in a lingering,
prehistoric superstition without philosophy, science, or religious reflection. Why? . . . Because the
geography of Africa does not select for traits such as long-term critical thinking, strong group-
dynamics, or innovative technology. Its facetious rain patterns prevented agricultural planning
while its tropical climate is one that does not change much from season to season, making food
gathering relatively easy, meaning those that reproduce the most will pass on their genes, not
necessarily rewarding those who are able to best train their offspring. Furthermore, the continent’s
lack of navigable, internal waterways greatly impeded the trading of goods, which impeded the
development of cities, long-distance networks, writing, and other necessary accoutrements of
economy. These conditions led to averages in intelligence that are concerned with immediate
tangibility, an average indolent temperament that self-aggrandizes, and an average physical
constitution that is athletic and robust.
Qualities such as these are not inherently unfavorable but are fundamentally ill-adapted to
long-term self-management and civilized phenomenon like: ubiquitous technology, the necessity
of interdependence in the abstraction, and adhering to rules. We frequently and disproportionately
find blacks abusing things they did not evolve themselves, such as: guns, social safety nets, and
ideas of legality. They consistently exhibit aggression, unmotivated labor, exhibitionistic tirades,
failure to take personal responsibility, non-reciprocity in kindness, and exploitative boundary-
pushing whenever they see an opportunity to benefit themselves, rarely seeming to understand its
counter-productive arrangement. The authority of ferocity guides them.
One could argue that this behavioral trend and the ‘obstacles’ blacks face across the
Western World are due to racism, poor education, or any number of other social sources. However,
when we consider what situation blacks were in when the races first interacted, and the situation
they regress to when left to their own devices, those complaints fail to explain the dramatic
disparity between tropical tribes and crusading sea vessels or in the observation that non-American
blacks of the Caribbean or Africa exhibit similar impulsiveness and non-critical floundering. They
did not evolve similar technology, group-dynamics, work-ethic, or long-term thinking because the
easy African environment did not necessitate those adaptations, so they never made a lasting
civilization and therefore find trouble adapting to any, let alone ours.
 18

3. Whereas black inability is more apparent and pronounced, the difficulty of other races
and cultures to integrate into Western Civilization is much more subtle, due to greater overlap in
intelligence, temperament, and physical ability. However, by applying the idea of moderation, it
becomes apparent that other peoples are generally either too loose or too strict for Western
Civilization. Whereas certain genetic groups are, on average, less inclined to be concerned with
matters outside their familial or immediate provincial sphere, even though they are capable of
civilized processes and adequately maneuvering therein, the fact that they did not progress beyond
medieval political structures into the modern day (by their own merit without Western assistance)
should clue us in to the observation that highly-structured democratic societies are out of their
reach. Similarly, races that are more cohesive and intelligent than whites are less inclined to
appreciate more democratic social norms due to a stronger desire to advantage uniformity and
order over the whims of the group.
Another important reason for lack of integration to Western Civilization by different ethnic
groups is the proclivity to homophily: self-segregation. Races look and generally think similarly,
and therefore find greater joy living near one another and advancing the interests of one another.
Assimilation is tertiary to advancing personal interests, which is inherently linked to collective
racial interests rather than a multicultural political end. Disparities in languages, cultures, and
values widen the divide and breed distrust between neighbors, factionalizing the populace from a
homogenous mass into racial categories and alliances, and sub-cultures with fabricated identities.
Though white culture has embraced egalitarian ends in the hope of making all classes and races
more equal in representation and outcome, there is no reciprocity in that sentiment, for the various
other classifications only see this as an opportunity to take advantage of a benevolent, self-imposed
resignation.
4. Then there are the phantom members of the white race or otherwise Westernized people
who are irresolute, comprising an ever-expanding population of feminine men and overexerted
women. They have little strength and no internal assertiveness – it’s been browbeaten out of them
from an early age through systematic rearing to passivity, weak examples, or insipid genetics.
These are the people who have no honest concept of reality or natural law because they’ve lived
all their lives in the media’s forged framework. In this environment, they have learned that if they
have no enemies, they no longer need strength or assertiveness. So they groom a polite amiability
to publicize friendliness, replacing resilience and valor. Their diffident cowardice is their stalwart
might – by being a victim, they become victors.
These predominantly urban and suburban ‘phantoms’ exploit the goodwill of others to alter
cultural definitions to allow their weakness to flawlessly slip into a new outlook. Shifting the
goalposts gently jostles the group into believing that something doesn’t need to be shamed or
improved, but instead needs acceptance and inclusion. In a word: they cannot adapt to the given
cultural status-quo, they have no identity in the group’s overall identity, so they seek to subvert it
or eliminate it altogether (instead of integrating or forming their own abstraction) until adequate
room is made to include their ideas. In their move to eliminate ostracism, they ally with racial
minorities who actually possess strength of will but cannot adequately express it in Western
Civilization. This physical and intellectual impotency forces a reliance on emotional
argumentation through language control – the amathia baizou of the bourgeois intelligentsia.
5. The last degenerating collection are sexual deviants of all racial and both gender
categories – that is, those who attempt to normalize non-traditional relationships and senses of
sexuality. Those we witness in ‘pride parades’, who practice sexuality in opposition to nuclear
family values for immediate, egotistic pleasure, who deliberately corrupt innocence for selfish
 19

ends, who flaunt miscegenation, who impose their biologically deviant ways atop naturality, and
who revel in defying the single function of existence: reproduction. Their pornographic
propaganda is readily available, tempting any passerby to impish gluttony. This is not to say they
are somehow ‘evil’ for their anomalous programming, but that aberrations should not be seen as
favorable, let alone as a triumph of diversity, for degenerate sexuality undermines all aspects of
group-cohesion by construing pleasure the focal core of all existence.
6. In practice, these above groups have united into what we call ‘The Coalition’, referring
to the contemporary American alliance of so-called ‘Social Justice Warriors’, (Feminists and
LGBTQ+) Black Lives Matter, Antifa, (Communists/Socialists/Anarchists) and other such
metropolitan organizations that oppose individuality and natural inequalities for a singular human
identity, facilitated through rampant, globalized multiculturalism, immigration, and redefinitions
of human nature. In a word, those who have succumb to the Modern Phenomenon have organized
in its defense as a degenerate unit with one single goal: to create a so-called utopia of equlity by
overthrowing Western heritage, replacing it with a global unity.
9. – Elites and Their Goals
Now we arrive at a very contentious assertion, for reasons which will shortly be made clear,
but which must be presently stated: that the Jewish community has formed the Modern
Phenomenon by dismantling traditional Western values for profit by encouraging degeneracy. The
argument elucidating this declaration should be firstly pretexted by summarizing Jewish history.
1. In ancient times, rabbis, priests, and scholars had higher reproduction-rates than non-
learned Jews, (by being more polygamous, facilitated through greater socio-economic,
occupational capital) meaning that they bore more children, leading to a greater average
intelligence and a linguistic/mathematical fixation. After being forced from the Levant through
numerous invasions, the Jewish people were spread across the ancient world in a diaspora,
strengthening their identity and solidarity. As explicitly stated in their holy texts, they believe
themselves a divinely chosen people who have an ordained destiny to lord over the world they
have been scattered across. Since ethnicity and religion are one in the same to Jews, and their faith
tied to race, it should not be surprising that even ‘secular Jews’ (that is, Jews who do not practice
Judaism) are part of the racial/philosophical consciousness that the texts prescribe. Their
derogatory word for Gentiles, that is, non-Jews – goyim, or the singular goy for short, which
translates to ‘cattle’ – further divides them from those they encountered, particularly in Europe.
As time elapsed, the always minority Jewish community that equated ethnicity, religion,
language, and history as one in the same, was typically the most scholarly community in a given
European kingdom, meaning they were better adapted to undertake roles in institutions of financial
management that said community would almost exclusively operate since it was also a sin for the
Christian super-majority to do so. By the time usury (lending money with interest) was seen as a
negligible spiritual offence, the centers of European finance had already been established and their
immense power, by using money to make money, felt throughout the continent and the New World.
This establishment continued down the centuries, only having serious modification with
the invention of technology-based entertainment at the end of the Nineteenth Century, which
required vast capital to propagate. So: Jews were ideally positioned to manage banks, banks were
ideally positioned to fund the media, the media was ideally positioned to coarse the populace by
appealing to its base instincts, and therefore we see how a minority of the Jewish community was
– and is – able to influence the masses through media and strangle the economy through banks.
Economic power became political power through democracy, when politicians can be bought,
legality construed, and the voting-populace convinced on a mass-scale. These observations do not
 20

necessitate some vast conspiracy, but only assert that Jews individually act in their own interest,
and these interests are globally unique and openly hostile to Gentiles – their in-group is
dramatically exclusive.
2. The reason this observation is such a contentious claim is because duplicitous usurpers
unsurprisingly do not want those they overlord to know the truth, let alone the identity of those
who have turned things from universal, ultimate optimism to suicidal despondency in less than a
century. This is why whenever anyone speaks up, they are immediately shamed and berated or
their livelihoods and families threatened through the castigated label of ‘racist’ (or the more
specific, special, ultra-racist thought-crime of ‘anti-Semitism’) and ‘conspiracy theorist’. You are
turned into a pariah if you do not exalt their values and consent to their supremacy. Any group and
any event can be investigated, tested, and judged except Jews and their deeds. These inquiries are
suppressed and shrouded behind the final, singular sin that the Modern Phenomenon scorns:
intolerance. Everything is to be tolerated except intolerance. Were it ever publicly disclosed just
who they were, what they’ve done, and what they still plan to do, the common person would end
the mundane drudgery of their day-to-day lives and instantly seek reformation, which is why the
masses are so conditioned to ignore the elites and their exalted height in the social hierarchy.
At the pinnacle of our Western social hierarchy exists a second hierarchy, where the elite
class resides – at the top of the pyramid is an orb, where law, money, and authority emanate from,
instilling all those beneath with false spiritualities that steady the zenith from rolling off the
structure. This predominantly Jewish, second, higher hierarchy is so insulated from the issues that
plague the common person and so far removed from daily struggle that they fail to understand
them, nor care to stoop so low. They all socialize together, sharing the same interests and goals
behind velvet veils and mahogany doors. Fantasies of reptilian, vampiric, demonic, or other such
imaginative supernatural labels get at the core idea of cohesion and ‘otherness’, but act as targets
for the elites to discredit those who understand their nature and objectives – these are ‘containment
ideas’ to prevent people from discovering the truth by only presenting them with some truth. The
elites are as human as you or I, but do not adhere to any morality or logic that we might understand,
for the ‘ruling class’ is so esoterically cohesive that they exist, for all intents and purposes, as a
separate society, with a subversively crafty behavior, opposed to the interests of the general
population but beneficial to the bankers, politicians, generals, judges, religious leaders, and other
exclusively authoritative and powerful positions.
3. But what personality or character do these elites undertake in their separate abstract
identity? We only need to look at what happens when these people are discovered and their
activities and socializing are brought to light. In the same vein of historically asking who Madam
Bathory and Marques de Sade were and what they did, we might ask ourselves:
* Who is Marc Deutrox, and why was his pornographic and pedophilic orgy network,
spanning across seven estates, where children were routinely raped, filmed, starved, and
killed, complicity covered up and ignored by Belgian police? Furthermore, why did
twenty witnesses die, and just how many international elites partook in his trafficking?
* Who is Jimmy Savile, and why were his hundreds of mentally ill and underage victims
only investigated after his death, after he had made millions hosting TV shows on the
BBC, doing charity work for children groups and psychiatric hospitals, and after being
knighted by the Queen?
* Who is Jeffrey Epstein, and how was the billionaire able to escape severe prosecution
from sexual acts with minors and prostituting minors to his associates, which included
President Clinton, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Leslie Wexner, and many others?
 21

Furthermore, why was his private island known as Orgy Island, and included a temple
with dentist equipment in it, to which a team of traffickers would bring girls?
* What is the Franklin Prostitution Ring, and how did money laundering lead investigators
to a child-sex trafficking ring that implicated high-figures in the Reagan and Bush
administration, but ultimately ended in victims being silenced? Furthermore, why did
Gary Caradori, the head investigator, die in a plane-accident that saw the craft break-
apart mid-air, after which he was replaced by a deliberately incompetent lead?
* What is the Casa Pia Scandal, and how were hundreds of children abused by Portuguese
and international politicians and media personalities for multiple years?
* Who is Marina Abramović, and how does she connect Hollywood elite (MOCA 2011
Gala), the Clinton coalition (Podesta e-mails), and the NXIVM sex-cult (rapist Allison
Mack’s twitter) into one social network through her satanic ‘spirit cooking’ art?
* Who are John and Tony Podesta, and how are they connected to James Alefantis (owner
of Comet Ping Pong) and David Brock (American Bridge PAC / Media Matters), let
alone most other people on this list? Furthermore, why do the Podesta brothers admire
overtly satanic or sadistic art and communicate using known pedophile code-words?
* Who is Laura Silsby, and how was she connected to and defended by Huma Abedin and
Bill Clinton through the Clinton Foundation after she was caught trafficking children out
of Haiti through the New Life Children’s Refuge missionary NGO? Furthermore, why
was her lawyer, Jorge Puello-Torres, a convicted sex trafficker, and why was she
afterwards hired by the Amber Alert providing company Alert Sense?
* Who is Anthony Weiner, and how are he and his wife, Huma Abedin connected to the
Clintons, even after he was found to be sexting with a minor and distributing child
pornography?
* Who is Michael Aquino, and how was he involved in the Presidio Day Care Scandal,
where children were sexually abused? Furthermore, how was this Lieutenant Colonel
able to start the Temple of Set cult after evidence of the scandal was destroyed by arson?
* Who is Cyril Smith, and why did British police completely ignore his sexual abuse of
minors throughout his political career and civilian life, even after his death?
* Who is Dennis Hastert, and how was the Speaker of the House indicted for financial
scandals, shown to have made false testimony to federal investigators, and forced to
admit that he was a child molester? Furthermore, why did he only serve thirteen months
in prison for these abuses of power and continue to receive his Congressional pension
over $70,000 annually at taxpayer expense before his death?
* Who is Jerry Sandusky, and how was he able to sexually abuse young boys for fifteen
years through his charity group, The Second Mile? Furthermore, why was his son
arrested for the same crime?
* Who is Francis Aungier Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford, and why did he defend both
Frank Beck, who sexually abused children from multiple children’s homes he directed
for over a decade, after which he was elected to public office, and the Moor Murderers,
who killed and raped children (Michael Horgan would later use their same location to
satanically torture and rape children with others, including his own children and a two-
year-old)? Furthermore, why did he form the Longford Report which called for more
rigid restrictions against pornographic material in media, and which Pakenham
collaborated with Jimmy Savile to create?
* Who is Stuart Hall, knighted by the Queen, and how was he let free after serving only
 22

half his prison sentence for sexually abusing over a dozen girls, aged 11 and up?
* Who is Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, and why was he able to repeatedly confess to sexually
enjoying young girls, yet prominently remain in left-wing German politics?
* What do the following Hollywood personalities have in common:
+ Roman Polanski + Paula Poundstone
+ Kevin Spacey + Rolf Harris
+ Woody Allen + Jared Fogle
+ Jeffrey Jones + Peter Yarrow (pardoned by Jimmy Carter)
+ Paul Reubens + Victor Salva
+ Luc Besson + Brian Peck
+ Andy Dick + Gary Glitter
+ Joel Iwataki + ‘Magic’ Mark Wincup
* Who are the following mid-ranking government employees, who have all been convicted
of extreme child porn possession or child sex offenses, including infants, which further
included bestiality for some:
+ Director of Cyber Security at the Department of Health and Human Services,
Timothy DeFoggi
+ Former Undersecretary of the Navy, who was a special assistant to Ronald
Reagan, James Daniel Howard
+ Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for South Florida, Anthony
Mangione
+ Maine Assistant Attorney General, James Cameron
+ Army prosecutor and judge advocate, Daniel Wollverton
+Child Protection Services staff, William Shaffer
These are not isolated events. These are people operating in a systemic, compartmentalized
way. If one person is discovered, maybe their ties to other influential people are known, but the
tapestry is never unwoven, only one thread pulled, cut, and a new one resewn – things are either
so specific as to exclude conspiracy, or so vaguely generalized as to include anyone minorly
powerful. There is immense reason to believe that the sociopathic people who are drawn to
political, financial, or entertainment power fonts are similarly drawn to unimaginably immoral acts
– the same egoism that will exalt any deed for advancement will also endorse any motive for
pleasure. But not only does the sex-cult and trafficking operations bring immediate pleasure and
ritualistic fulfillment, they also ensure that everyone involved keeps silent and protects the
integrity of the whole endeavor, because they’re all equally culpable from them on and can use the
acts to blackmail one another. It is the underlying fabric of their common scheme that power allows
them all forms of sexual abandon and mass-manipulation prevents this state-of-affairs from being
interrupted.
4. This international mass-manipulation is expressed in its own nationalized and local
hierarchies, with their more localized goals, that feed into shared ‘grand objectives’. For the United
States, this is clearest by illustrating the intersection of banks, politics, and the military: the so-
called ‘Military Industrial Complex’. The elites of Western countries commission intelligence
agencies and politicians to create foreign or domestic ‘enemies’ that require prolonged engagement
to destroy, forming a cycle of endless war that costs taxpayers trillions and propagates the will of
the elite across the globe. Wars must be fought for the banks to expand their dominion; they must
be fought for politicians to rally the people and promote patriotism; and, of course, the military
exists for the sole purpose of fighting wars – but for them to fight, they must have a reason supplied
 23

by the people, represented by their politicians, and the politicians must know who to fight, which
is supplied by the banks, which are ultimately beholden to international interests but immediately
beholden to the central banking entity of the given nation.
The primary, central bank of the United States is the Federal Reserve, which supplies
money to all other American banks. Private individuals own and operate nationally-chartered
banks, which are required to have shares in the Federal Reserve, which allows member banks to
vote for regional directors who determine financial policies. This operation is overseen by a ‘board
of governors’, who are appointed by the President; however, despite the governmental oversight,
regardless of its minimal role, the whole process is shrouded in secrecy and deliberate identity
masking to the point that only vague, generalized operations are known at all.
Its core function is to create money. How it achieves this cannot be over-stressed. The
Federal Reserve loans money to the United States, which the government pays back with interest.
To state a different way: the privately-owned central bank creates money for the government with
the guarantee that that money will be returned with some extra. But where does the Federal Reserve
get the money? . . . From nowhere. Money is created at an inflated rate that the Federal Reserve
decides because it has absolute power to create money by authorizing the Treasury to print images
on paper or enter numbers into a computer. The Federal Income Tax was created for the express
purpose of paying off the debt incurred by asking the central bank to fund the government; that
debt being owed to a private institution, operated by bankers with both domestic and international
interests. But where does the tangible ability to rectify that debt come from? . . . From the Federal
Reserve again, which gladly prints more money with more intrinsically attached debt. When the
government requests money from the Federal Reserve to pay-off debt from previous loans, they
incur yet more debt, making it impossible to end the process and become a debt-free nation. Thus
the entire financial structure of the United States, and most other Western Nations, is completely
controlled by unelected corporations with unique and separate concerns, who create their own
policies through the Federal Reserve, trapping the entire population in an endless cycle of debt
being payed-off with more debt.
This system was created by Woodrow Wilson, J. P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, and Senator
Aldrich, along with the wealthiest men in America, who met on Jekyl Island in Georgia, hiding
under secret names, to debate and draft the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Since then, we’ve gone
from a currency backed by gold, to one backed by nothing, to a ‘petro-dollar’ that has value only
because the United States made a deal with Saudi-Arabia to trade their oil solely in US Dollars.
This is also why we’ve been constantly engaged in the Middle-East since the mid-late-70’s:
because this exchange was not a one-way deal – the Saudi’s bribed the international police force
to advance their interests. This chain-reaction of establishing the Federal Reserve, getting off the
gold standard, and attaching value to Middle-Eastern oil creates all sorts of conflicting
international interests that reflect on what the populace domestically experiences and is influenced
to believe.
The intricate and vast Military Industrial Complex can be further glimpsed at by studying
and asking:
* What is Operation MK ULTRA, and how did the CIA conduct hundreds of secret and
sometimes lethal experiments on US citizens for determining mind-control techniques?
* What is Operation Mockingbird, and how did the CIA successfully infiltrate domestic
and foreign media outlets to sway public opinion? Furthermore, what is the ‘Nayirah
Testimony’, and how did the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador pull the US into the
Gulf War through script writing and acting counselling from the Hill and Knollen PR
 24

Firm and the CIA?

* What is Operation Northwoods, and why would the Department of Defense plan on
staging false flag terrorist attacks, in which many US citizens would be deliberately
killed, to induce war against Cuba? Furthermore, how did the highly influential Project
for the New American Century (whose members included Dick Cheney and Donald
Rumsfeld) plan on capitalizing on a 9/11-style catastrophe to advance elite interests?
* What is the Church Committee, and how did the Senate investigate intelligence agencies
and determine the very real potential that they could and might tyrannically invade the
privacy of citizens? Furthermore, how did the USA PATRIOT Act (signed into law by
the son of a former CIA director) materialize the Committee’s concerns?
* What is Bohemian Grove, and why have presidents, tycoons, politicians, and socialites
attended it’s ritualistic ‘mock-sacrifices’ in the middle of the woods for over a century?
Furthermore, how did atomic weapons directly gestate from the annual gathering?
* What is the Bilderberg Group, and if their council of 150 is so influential for international
business and policy, why are reporters barred from their meetings? Furthermore, how do
the elite participants and their goals overlap with those of the Trilateral Commission and
Council on Foreign Relations?
* What is the USS Liberty Incident, and why did the Israeli armed forces knowingly attack
and sink a United States ship in the eastern-Mediterranean to provoke an American
response against Egypt? Furthermore, why would it be illegal to ‘boycott Israel’?
*Why did we begin the Gulf War to defend Kuwait against Saddam Hussein, who was
initially put in power by the US? Furthermore, why did we escalate the Vietnam War
after deliberate misinformation from the Gulf of Tonkin Incident? Similarly, why was
Libya destroyed under the false-pretext of humanitarian action and how was Hillary
Clinton vital in the crusade to remove the one nation holding back African immigration
to Europe?
5. So if there is an occult elite class who uses the Military Industrial Complex to move
pieces around a board, how exactly are the masses themselves manipulated to be unaware or
supportive? . . . The elites use media as a tool to exclude or deride viewpoints opposed to this state
of things by distracted oversaturation, caricatures and misinformation, or by convincing people
that their own interests are in-line with the interests of the elites who use them. By portraying an
invented norm, they use the instinctual, social prerogative to conformity as a way of tricking people
into compliance without them even realizing it. Americans believe they are too smart for
propaganda, but in this hubris they have become susceptible to all forms of manipulation from the
airwaves of seemingly simplistic amusement.
Every single frame of every film-reel, and every vibrating musical mountain and depth is
toiled over and deliberated in council because they cost so much to produce – that means every
visual or auditory decision is made by choice for some specific reason. There are no coincidences
in media and the patterns are undeniably favorable to a set of interests that are not American in
nature. This process is so effective, it can even work against those who would otherwise be eternal
enemies of the elites. To castrate potential threats, the media steers a disconcerted sub-group in a
direction favorable to their ends, appropriating would-be revolutionaries and reformers yet still
allowing them to believe they are such. This is exactly how the elite class has wielded the Coalition
as a weapon against the West.
At first blush, it might seem strange that the elites would favor the Coalition as the
instrument of their will, since the elite class are so racially homogenous and financially prominent
 25

and since the amalgamation stands against that status-quo and for a more radically equitable
approach. However, it becomes apparent that they are using this arm of society for two main
reasons: 1) – to advance multiculturalism, diversity, and tolerance, which Jews have used for
millennia to justify their insular presence in alien lands as an ‘international people’; and 2) –
because their approach puts economic and political power singularly in bureaucratic sway, thus
ensuring the elite’s complete dominion over society. In this way, the Coalition is manipulated by
the media and their compromised sense of rebelliousness to benefit an aristocratic class of people
that has formed the conditions they seek to resist. The Coalition unconsciously aids the ends of the
system they ‘fight against’, further facilitating an international, global mindset by undermining
traditional values.
6. But how can a mindset be global? – Or: what is the culture of multiculturalism? . . . It is
the ‘merchant mentality’, that ascribes to a monetary morality. Diversity, internationalism,
multiculturalism, and tolerance are only virtuous because they are good for business, which only
values the dollar and what is marketable to the common-denominator. By molding a world without
distinctions in culture, race, gender, family, history, or geographic differences,
(deterritorialization) globalization’s homogenization bereaves the individual of any reference
point or motivation to reach out for something greater than what we’re presented with, namely:
the products, employment, and wavering relations we encounter through the interests of those with
malicious power. An erosion of real identity has washed away biologically determined qualities
with a consumeristic nihilism. Any philosophy or culture that exalts matter and pleasure as the
highest ideals is only useful for those who wish to lord over pawns.
Dance, food, architecture, fashion, art, music – the external indications of a culture – are
all homogenously fluid and post-modern, and completely under the whims of what the media is
portraying, which is always informed by what the elites desire. Only in a soup of imprecise
meaning lacking honor can corporate governments profit to the upmost of their potential – only
then will placation rule over all people, when we all look the same, think the same, and share the
same values of the dollar and the pacified rebel. Only when we are individually alone and isolated;
when love becomes one-night-stands, family becomes step-siblings and single parents and
emotional bonds are surrogated in projection onto pets, sharing a meal becomes quiet digestion in-
front of screens, the reproductive prerogative is seen as disgusting and all manner of horrendous
sodomy is seen as liberating, and earnest patriotism and moral conscientiousness become taboo.
This is why the West must be diversified and immigration must flow unabated: to turn the white
masses into a mixed-race people who have no identity except that which is mass-produced by the
elites: pop-culture.
All we need to ask is: what are the Hooton and Kalergi Plans, and why would elites support
their massive immigrant intake and subsequent miscegenation/out-breeding programs? – And:
who opened the gates of Grenada, Toledo, and Constantinople so that Muslim invaders could
overrun Christian cities?
7. After the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution forever changed history by
introducing the world to massive, self-governing populations driven by a dependence on
technology, the cyclical, deep-seated truths about natural law were replaced by the idea that
profitability is the greatest good and anything which impedes that, the greatest evil. Progress and
profitability are inherently opposed to tradition, because tradition hinders fluidity by imposing
moderation and standards of heritage, which tempers consumerism. Degenerate ideas are easy to
sell, easy to spread, and compound at each conversion, but homophily and heritage get in the way
 26

– degeneracy is the vacuum of space, and only an atmosphere-shell of certain values can allow
society to flourish and protect the abstract organism from its deathly cold.
So, ultimately, the elites who ‘founded’ the Modern Phenomenon despise moral health for
two reasons: 1) – their power is determined by their relevance and public image, which is
threatened when a genuine individual endorses a way conflicting with their authority; and 2) – if
people are swayed to moral health, they will ignore their authority, and all their control will
diminish and die. The greatest fear of the imposter or deceiver is being discovered as such, for they
profit only when the truth is concealed, and the truth never fears to be investigated. They do not
like humanity or human nature and they wish to radically change it rather than improve or master
it. To do so, they have both short-term and long-term goals. Their short-term goals are to: breed
out whites and create a mulato underclass so that no one will have anything higher to reach toward
than consumerism and media dogma, which feed one another. And their long-term goals are to:
use artificial intelligence and genetic engineering to create a transhuman utopia where only a few
select families and their loyal servants will exist. Manipulating the West allows them to hide
behind whites and use their prosperity, so this situation will continue until they deem it time to
move.
10. – An Annotated Closing
Those who assert the serendipitous idiopathy of degeneracy, or who fail to see it as such,
are completely oblivious. Those who furthermore ignore the horrid source lurking behind it are so
willfully ignorant it is tantamount to defenestrating lucidity. Those in denial of the waning of
Western Civilization have been taken by a hypnogogic paradox bordering on insanity. An
ideologically ironic entitlement permeates young and old; for what’s prepared for adults is
devoured by children – Or is it the other way ‘round? . . . Existence within the Modern
Phenomenon is an endless orgy of freakish sexuality and the intermingling of barbaric and debased
cultures, topped with instant gratuity. Every admirable, moral or virtuous behavior is so minutely
represented in the Modern Phenomenon that it can only be explained as residual evidence of a time
when humanity was more human. This state bears ill of the present and abysmal for the future.
We have been conditioned to sensationally trivialize the above repugnancy through
duplicitous means and assisted non-action, manipulating perception into a haze of disagreements.
Nothing of any significance is desired because the frustration is a misinformed naïveté or
deliberate redirection to symptoms, never the cause. This is due to two reasons. Firstly, people
enjoy the norm and only desire unfavorable aspects to change, ignorant of the fact that these are
part of an intricate, interconnected system that is piloted by individuals and institutions that work
against them and eliminating only unfavorable aspects, if even possible, would still maintain that
state-of-affairs. Secondly, those piloting elites and institutions have direct power, oblique
influence, and limitless wealth because of these deep ills, gaining immense advantage from them.
So a cure will never be discussed or disseminated. Nevertheless, despite these contrivances, the
situation of the Modern Phenomenon is unsustainable in the long-term and will, ultimately,
collapse under the weight of the degenerate weakness and waste it breeds.
Notwithstanding, with fate encroaching day by day, we always need to keep in mind that
very, very few people act with intended malice – it’s almost always a single thread in a long string
of convenient concessions, which the Modern Phenomenon gladly enables. It’s all a means to avoid
discomfort and maintain homeostasis with folded hands. Most everyone waits for some stimuli to
prompt their response, totally without control over themselves. Actors by every conceivable
pejorative – complacently complicit. The modern person’s problems are not concerned with the
 27

question of existence or absence or even abstracts and physicality, but with the favorable and
unfavorable – since existence is taken as a given, the only choices are tertiary tastes.
But none of it, not one bit, is by necessity associated with living a human life. Would a
human life be content in a cornucopia of sterility? Would a human life entrench itself in repetitive
tasks only a machine could appreciate? Would a human life feel adequate as a constituent to
debauched overlords? Would a human life feel satisfied in the turmoil of the city, or the cowardice
of the suburbs? Would a human life mollify itself with ritualistic family television, or the alter of
a personal computer? Would a human life give fealty to the spectacle of coercion? Would a human
life reprise the rippling failures around them without an attempt at rectification? Would a human
life take all or nothing? Would a human life tolerate the insanity of an enforced serenity? . . .
Would you? . . .
The gullible candor of the 20th Century has been obliterated by its infelicitous failures.
Belief in the news, assurance in science or technology to solve our problems, conviction in religion,
hope in the economy, confidence in the government, faith in our fellow man, and the prospects of
a tactful horizon have all been shown to be misplaced, misguided, or miscarried. Neither has the
concomitant, melancholic choices of post-modernistic analysis helped anything. In fact, it’s only
made things worse. There are no longer any institutions that bring up the individual or serve the
people, let alone whites. Instead, they only serve the elite hierarchy. It’s the subservience of
cataleptic convenience.
Hackneyed faulting no longer suffices though – everyone does it. Now we require some
sort of resolution, for knowledge of good and evil thrusts one from the idyllic, invented microcosm
into the larger realm of dirt and decay without direction. All previous meaning and purpose: erased
as a mirage before sober eyes, with a heart left empty and echoing with questions. How would a
real human being, not a civilized degenerate, actually act? Can the West recover over traitors to
conquer again? What do we need for personal and social reformation?

__________
 28

IV
A Real Human Being

1. Preface
1. Generally assumed: comfort is the avoidance of the unfavorable, while success is the
attainment of the favorable. Both expect something outside the individual to mirror the individual’s
desires. As the Buddhists teach, the Stoics understand, and the Taoists smirk at: you’re only setting
yourself up for disappointing failure if your happiness hinges on the Universe, or abstract,
prostrating itself to your whims. Flow, balance, sternness – these accept and struggle within the
bounds set upon us. We cannot change reality, we cannot change human nature, and we can only
influence aspects of the group/others, but not fully control them. Regardless, at this point in the
text, we have no internal authority to direct others, so all that’s left is to change oneself, and the
only aspects that are changeable are our attitude and our physique. Even though these can
deteriorate with age or accidents, they are still under the control of the personal abstraction: the
mind. This is all we can hope to master in a meaningfully exact way. The only pure utopia that can
be made is a clear, calm mind.
It used to be that resource scarcity informed social behavior, which formed traditions to
prevent over-indulgence through shame or exclusion; but now, with every historic barrier
unhinged, we exist with only the individual self as a moderating faucet. To alter any of this, one
must first cleanse the pollution of the Modern Phenomenon from the body and mind. The Kingdom
within molds the environment for an awakening of the external Kingdom.
2. We’re all aware that diagnoses are easier than solutions, especially when the favorable
is always biased and nobody knows the truth in full. More often than not, people can supply a
personal solution without ever following through themselves, but I can only claim my favorable.
I cannot typify every individual – only their groups and species. Though I might currently
disparage the endeavor of universals on each person, I will clarify that while the specifics are a
mystery: to practice virtuous moderation, to oppose iniquitous degeneracy, to experience love, and
to be esteemed by a community of one’s choice is copacetic nobility which none can give or take
but one. This is life’s greatest, most authentic joy and the aspiration of a Real Human Being – to
make and know one’s place according to every aspect of reality. This is the smirking spirit of
existence, and the personal honor of absence.
3. Though it may not seem like it up to this point, this is a manifesto of cathartic joy, not
brooding anger, for the anger is not the end but a means to the fulfillment – from despair to
confidence. When you give up, when you are demoralized beyond recovery, that is when you
become nothing. That is when you’re worse than dead. You become an object to be used, only a
cog to the favorable of another. Never give up; neither on the world or yourself! – For the Universe
and all reality work toward the principles of moderation and balance, the same that we endeavor
toward! – And when your blood boils at the degeneracy, it is your ancestors encouraging you!
2. Traditional Values
1. Traditions are the behavior of heritage from generations prior that point to simple,
unending truths about the nature of reality from a practical, human sense, bound by spiritual
mysteries. Since reality is unknowable, we must appeal to more
archetypical/mythological/intuitive observations and assertions about the nature of the Universe
and humanity’s place in it – but since the Modern Phenomenon suppresses and subverts these
human qualities, we must use anthropology to justify them. These traditional values are aligned
 29

with natural law in that baseline human existence must accept the Universe’s intrinsic order to
survive and propagate itself. Traditional values are not angered by or opposed to natural trends of
the system but acknowledge and interrogate them to learn how sustainable homeostasis might be
established. There is a reason they are so historically widespread – they are default human viability.
They support organic hierarchical structures, individual dignity, interdependence, tribalistic
differences/out-group separation, and other such facets of human nature. Adding to traditional
values overcomplicates a base set of simple observations and trends, while taking from them
creates unsustainable indiscipline. This social discipline is only achievable through traditional
values, because they accept the laws of the systems that humanity acts within and plans
accordingly.
Even if traditions are not as exact as other methods, they are much more applicable to long-
term community survival and are corroborated by natural law, which can be understood through
science without devolving into a purely scientific understanding. And though there are wild
discrepancies between cultures and races, there are underlying principles that all share, such as:
nuclear family values, spirituality, pastoral labor, and violent competition – essential, immutable
beliefs and practices that encourage moderation from an understanding of reality and its cycles.
2. ‘Nuclear family values’ are those circumstances that promote sustainability in the
immediate, genealogical abstract, which is the most important extension of the self (love,
reproduction, irremovable clan) and the physical basis for the larger community abstraction.
Without a healthy, mature family, the entire social order collapses. Health and maturity are
achieved through straight, monogamous relationships, fidelity in that relationship, a lack of
addiction in the home that relationship creates, and shame to those who flaunt the opposite. These
values promote balance in the home by guaranteeing a natural, optimized environment and
personalities to rear children to virtue, who will, in turn, perpetuate the cycle – it creates a base for
colonization outside it. It must promote health and deride unhealthiness by utilizing both pride in
accomplishments ad shame for missteps. Shame can only be uttered from a place of established
superiority (matriarch, patriarch, or the abstract body itself) and is utilized to maintain the group-
dynamic and inform new members on boundaries – shame is the immune-system of the social
body. Furthermore, this system imbues a view of complimentary masculinity and femininity to
children with an appreciation for the dynamic. This phenomenon is usually linked with religion
but can be achieved through other spiritualities that are less dogmatic.
3. ‘Spirituality’ has already been somewhat disclosed above, but bears repeating for present
elucidation. It is simply the systems of place and purpose that are used to justify movements within
reality and explain the unexplainable – the individual’s relation to the Universe and what lies
beyond knowledge of it. It is not marred by superstition, but aware of axiomatic truths. Though
spirituality can be an appeal to natural law and other universal facets, historically, spirituality is
religious, meaning that it is bound to institutions and catechistic learning – not innately revealed
or intuitive, but taught by authority. In very simple terms: religion helps individuals strapped for
leisurely contemplation or intellectual capacity arrive at complex ideas with minimal effort, and it
helps the abstract by consistently reinforcing social hierarchy and cohesion. This is not derisive
but meant to exemplify how useful religion is to both the abstract and physical in that it concisely
informs morality, cosmology, and group relations. Issues arise only when religion attempts to
supersede its boundaries and begins to force itself on matters outside its sphere. As with
everything, unchecked immoderation is cancerous. However, without a definite spirituality based
in heritage, it is unlikely that the individual will form a spiritual system of their own, which is why
 30

religion and natural law’s role in tradition is so pronounced because without a sense of
metaphysical relation, humanity flounders in the favorable and unfavorable.
4. ‘Pastoral labor’ simply refers to a fondness for outdoor activity with an emphasis on a
strong work-ethic. Romanticism and cultural nostalgia for pre-industrial virtues logically follow
this sense of an existence and effort within the natural order, and, in that sense, it is also a respect
for natural law, stemming from a necessity derived from existence within it. It is a homely, self-
sufficient, hard-faced acceptance that without willing work, absence will encroach quicker. It is
an acknowledgement that the fruits of labor are earned and should not be infringed upon. It is
craftsmanship, not robotic, assembly-line activity.
5. ‘Violent competition’ means a sorting-out of irreconcilable disagreements, honor duels,
and war. Open, honest communication can settle practically every ‘real-world’ disagreement.
Effective communication requires empathy, mutually bending modes of thoughts to a common
linguistic understanding, and it helps both parties verbalize the inside, weeding out useless ideas.
But if communication fails and the disagreement is unsolvable, violence presents a final resolution
being the ultimate arbiter as force. Resolution emerges from combat between the two parties and
reconciliation can be facilitated through a metaphysical mutuality that words can never vocalize.
Communication is inexplicably, primarily vital to understanding and resolution, but if these earnest
efforts should somehow fail, consensual violence must be given its place – we should avoid
violence, but never deny it.
If you cannot settle disagreements with violence as a last resort (if society has outlawed
such) there will be no basis to defend one’s honor, and therefore honor itself will erode, and with
it, all inclination for virtue and moderation. Risking violence between two willing participants
outweighs the social upheaval that follows from banning it. Furthermore, as gratuitous pleasure
overtakes honor and service, the only barrier between the individual and total hedonistic anarchy
will be the police force, which will make them hated and hated to the point that they become more
and more violent in a desperate cycle that will only end in ceaseless violence. In former times,
when personal honor and valor were exalted and not yet extinct, duels and inter-abstract violence
were only ever seen as unfavorable if marked by immoderation or aggression, and questions of
personal principle were upheld by more than words. Now, questions of personal principle are only
able to be upheld in speech or one risks legal ramifications. So the only choices that remain are to
glamorize violence or pacify it totally and neither is moderate. Traditional violence is favorable,
needed, and useful; modern violence is unfavorable and gets in the way of larger operations, so is
systemically opposed.
3. The Identity
By honing virtue and traditional values through understanding of natural law, one might
rightly be called a Real Human Being – that is, a person who is unaffected by phenomena they
cannot influence and moderate that which they can. I will not delineate precisely what or who a
Real Human Being is but articulate a medley vision of its characteristics with no subset separations.
This approach is to portray something more mythical and traditionally standard rather than
unattainably detailed.
Every human is uniquely flawed, lacking, unable to attain their greatest self – and though
they should strive for betterment every day, every hour, it’s paramount to reaffirm the impossibility
of perfection and the folly of an imagined ‘permanent victory’. No one should try to
metamorphosis into a perfect archetype – you should try to metamorphosis into yourself. You
should hope to experience all the flavors of humanity: all the fear, sadness, nostalgia, logic, oafish
 31

spontaneity, ego, carnality, violence, joy, disappointment, everything. You should hope to be
human in your own way, not beyond it or beyond yourself.
And by that, the Real Human Being is an individual expression, a contrarian, a follower
and leader of themselves. They rebel against the rebels, whose ideas can be bought and sold. They
are the antithesis to the eternal, cloying degenerate, who sees no virtue, no truth, nothing but their
favorable. Aware of mundane, hypocritic consumerism and totemic dogmatism, the Real Human
Being is a bothering, irreverent, ‘devil’s advocate’ provocateur to self-righteous authorities. It is
not their task to blind or shock people with the truth or their heroism – it is their station to simply
do the moral, natural, and human thing. The Real Human Being does not expect sympathy,
condoning sentiments, or even understanding.
Yet still, their beliefs and identity cannot be easily cataloged in labels – not even the label
of the free-thinking seeker. They try their best to be genuine in their freedom, understanding that
each of us are only as free as we want to be and only confined by submission to self-imposed rules.
These genuine people hold total power. Their behavior is an exegesis of their soul – the appeal of
their mentality is its lack of constraint or forcefulness. Suum cuique, with virtue guiding.
Historically, they are the honorable samurai of medieval Japan and the chivalrous knight of
medieval Europe; the civically-conscious citizen-soldier of Ancient Greece or Rome, and the
yeoman pioneer of early Anglo-Americans, who accept that there is no justice, no peace, wisdom,
or freedom except that which the individual constantly struggles toward. Currently, in the Modern
Phenomenon, where you can get away with anything, what you choose not to do is just as important
as what you do.
A Real Human Being understands that mistakes are only adverse if nothing is done to
correct or learn from them. They understand that all pain is temporary, even if it lasts a lifetime,
that truth is never a burden, and wisdom extends weightless uncertainty in every direction. They
are both educated and experienced because they understand that the later without the former is
only useful for understanding the self, while the former without the latter is only useful for
understanding things outside the self. A Real Human Being is: a (singular) real (virtuous and
faithful) human being (honest member of their flawed species). The virtues of Honesty, Goodwill,
Strength, Autonomy, and Humor primarily comprise and promote what being a Real Human Being
means.
4. Establishing Humanity
So now we enter into a barren valley, where we individually discover the barriers between
ourselves and this vision, identifying the pollutions and eradicating them. It is time to become who
you want to be, who you need to be to go out into the world and change it. This takes commitment
and action, not just thinking and feeling. Languidly hoping for a change in the world without a
change in the self is just as delusional as defending that there’s nothing you would like to change
about yourself or the world. What follows is not the vernacular of the Real Human Being, but a
cultivation or account of the idea founded in tradition. In no way should this text be taken to mean
this is only route to express one’s humanity, but that it is informed by history, philosophy, and my
experiences to be helpful and more-or-less natural – not empirically perfect whatsoever.
1. Ubiquitous pleasure sensations have weakened us daily within the mental framework
that the Modern Phenomenon has supplied. How can we discover ourselves, our human nature, or
reality if we are constrained by the mechanizations of an approved, standard set of habits and
behavior that encourage false spiritualities? How can we find ourselves and realize who we truly
are when that identity has always been imposed, with no time to ourselves for introspection without
the ticking of the clock, televised voices, or artificial buzzes ringing in our ears? To put plainly:
 32

being born, being reared, being taught, and being alive within the Modern Phenomenon for most
of our existence has asserted a specific concept of what being human means and prevented people
from finding and applying the truth.
The average human mind yearns to exist within limits, the exceptional seeks to surpass
them – but any human who feels they exist in a limitless Universe would shrink from it and create
limits for themselves. In their own ways, every human hides their worthlessness to the Universe
behind a mirage of self-imposed sentimentality to safety and meaning. These sentiments are
typically governed by cultural norms and values, bestowing an objective to life that serves social
ends. Within the Modern Phenomenon, this sense of inclusion, purpose, and good feeling are only
within the bounds of industrial, civilized phenomenon, not organic phenomenon. When we witness
en masse unironic devastation at every inconvenience, or sighing disillusionment from some
unwanted complication, we realize that the social orchestration has failed to prepare people for
existence apart from its logistical protection. Therefore, one must also discover less restrictive
environments to learn from – we must account for more than one portion of reality. If we accept
that the Modern Phenomenon is a problem, then we should not be persuaded that we can find a
full answer within it . . . How can this be done, then?
2. By, in every sense, fleeing it and its gluttony to experience the non-constructed reality
of nature in a pilgrimage vigil into the unknown of the soul amid an environment without man-
made norms. Not as a means of escapism, but as a means of new input apart from what we’ve
involuntarily accepted. By undertaking a prolonged, uncomfortable hajj into a state of existence
that is not coddled by safety or meaning. By reencountering our natural habitat as Homo sapiens,
disconnected from an immoderate degree of safety. By disconnecting ourselves from every manner
of assigned or fabricated identity and setting internal issues straight. To be in nature protractedly
is to rediscover the non-degenerative aspects of animality, the neutrality of existence, and the
criterion of creation. It is an adventure, a quest of quietude, undertaken with repeated vigor if
necessary.
3. Our greatest spiritual heroes savored secluded introspections. Jesus and Moses isolated
themselves in the wilderness for over a month. Siddhartha, the Buddha, meditated alone for a
month and a half. Many Native American tribes sent their matured sons out on vision quests, to
‘go out’ for however long it took to discover who they were. Zoroaster, Socrates, Gandhi, even
Heracles all had their introspections, depending on the legend. The fact that these stories pervade
most every epoch and culture shows that something about the idea is important to human nature.
Some spiritually adventurous urging is present in us all, even if it is suppressed. When isolated
self-sufficiency, asceticism, and reflection are achieved in a natural setting to cultivate physical,
mental, and spiritual fortitude for the return to civilization, we partake in an atavistic enterprise
with our most ancient ancestors.
As always though, this is not to mean that the particular methods of one of these narratives
is flawless. If a shoe is three sizes too small, we don’t cut holes in the front to make sandals of it.
The accoutrements of conduct are singular. A ragged cloak and stick? A deep meditation under a
bodi or birch or whichever? Perhaps these experiences help, being fundamentally undistracted and
uncomplicated. They are not necessary or definitive whatsoever, though.
4. Even if there were a ‘right way’ of conducting this ‘escape’, nature’s fickle testings have
a way of construing unique disruptions that would distend experience regardless. To an extent,
that’s also the point of it all too – to realize the order of civilization is an artificial cadence
compared to the apparent chaos of nature. That said, one must still survive the escape to learn from
it and in that way there are certain things that should be respected. Preparation, for one thing,
 33

should be done months or years in advance – exercising, taking practice camping trips, conducting
research, and discussing it with loved ones. Though you cannot ever be fully prepared, once you’ve
decided heart and mind to go into the wilderness seeking yourself, you begin that moment; not
when you arrive in the wild. Find an area that resonates with you and is undisturbed by humanity
– ‘national forest wilderness areas’ are a great place to start. Seek isolation, seek the who, why,
and how. Connect with the nature around you: howl, shout, smile, laugh, cry, be paranoid, be nude,
be shy, be human with the place you’ve chosen and with yourself.
Another thing is to more fully understand death by encountering the most innate human
apprehensions: loneliness, hunger, boredom, the darkness, discomfort, freedom, the wilderness –
only a string of words until truly experienced. Being alone for at least three days, eating nothing
is a fairly standard and useful method. The ordeal is not something that can be put in a curriculum
– it’s something which must be discovered almost by accident. It may seem like mystic masochism
to some, but only to those who see human nature as ‘good’ and clean. To the wary reader, it may
also seem like immoderation. This is accurate, but only in response to the surrounding degeneracy
– an immoderated situation requires a conversely striking event to reestablish equilibrium.
On returning, you will be cleansed; but the degeneracy of the Modern Phenomenon will
soon sully you again and you will likely succumb to its temptations. If we truly wish for an active
transformation of the self, our actions must reflect it by separating them from past performance
and the values they clung to. What you internally believe, what you externally communicate to
others, and what your actions testify to should all encompass a singular idea. The escape helps us
realize that, but it is no end-unto-itself for accomplishing it. One cannot truly change without
dramatic encounters, but after germination, a sapling still needs water, soil, and Sun.
5. Maintaining Humanity
1. How do we cultivate ourselves within the Modern Phenomenon – before, after, or in-
between escapes? We do not propose disgruntled isolation, even if it is the only way to have
uniformity and demarcations without violation, because to be truly and totally alone is, in most
every case, an immoderation of one’s social nature. Neither do we endorse seamlessly merging
into the Modern Phenomenon for obvious reasons grounded in its inherent degeneracy – what does
it matter what you believe if you act the same as everyone else? Cultivation must come from
within, as training. By adapting to constant change and directing it to favorable ends, we can begin
to see reality and ourselves for what they really are and make noticeable improvement where
possible. The following points rebalance what was made immoderate by the Modern Phenomenon
and strengthen the body and mind for expansion. They will create a feedback loop where what you
do will change your attitude, will change what you do . . .
* Avoid sugary, greasy, and fatty foods that poison the flesh and addict your mind,
making your diet consist of natural things to fuel the body with the kind of energy it has
evolved to intake
* Cook your own food – it is cheaper and healthier
* Exercise the physique regularly to discipline oneself and advance the potentiality of your
reach in reality, thus preventing sedentary apathy and depression
* Do not imbibe drink or smoke as often, for they weaken you if made regular, and avoid
drugs altogether except as one-time experience expansion – recreationally use becomes
a crutch
* Meditate daily to cultivate the mind in all aspects and develop a sense of presence
* Avoid pornography at all costs, for it insults natural sexuality and infects us with
addictive instability and insatiable gratuity
 34

* Read books instead of staring at screens to better learn the intricacies of ideas and to build
a patience for and mastery of language
* Begin writing your thoughts down to test your linguistic competence and the
consistency and coherency of the internal when made external
* With language, learn to be concise and to-the-point, never wasting
* Delete all social media accounts, opting to communicate more personally with friends
and family
* Destroy your television, for it only recites lies the elites wish you to repeat
* Remove the toxin of peers who enable degeneracy and immoderation
* Never apologize or validate degenerates or engage in idle conversation with no direction
or purpose
* Never find yourself bored and never humor a wasteful activity – remain resolute with
your goals by avoiding stagnation and the unfulfilling allure of momentary distraction
* Work a garden to learn about the fragility of life and the rewards of outdoors labor
* Declutter and organize your living space and let in natural light to make one feel more
productive, capable, and self-reliant
* Never rush into anything or attempt an undertaking unprepared or underinformed to
moderate your temperament against recklessness
* Pay off your current debt and endeavor to avoid it in the future, for when you are in debt,
you own nothing and are at the mercy of others; never spend more than you make
* Strive for financial self-sufficiency through entrepreneurial endeavors, strict saving
regimens, and multiple income streams rather than simple employment and labor for
someone else
* In general: be patient, proactive, positive, and persistent
Self-education is key to all this, though it can often devolve into a ‘self-medication’ of sorts
if not guided by critical thinking and the wisdom of the past . . . Everyone instinctively knows
what to do to enhance their power and control the authority of ferocity in themselves and others,
but they falter at pervasive instant gratification. The byproduct of the Modern Phenomenon has so
weakened us that we cannot be made whole again all at once, nor has anyone from any time or
culture been improved the second their desire was initially mobilized.
It’s not about getting what you want but forging it; neither should we want overextension
or immoderation, for they lead to excess, weakness, and dependence. To encourage a lack of
anxiety and a willingness to know things which may conflict with current beliefs, you must prepare
to accept your fallibility. Control of the mind leads to a lack of needless fear, leads to stepping out
and practicing, leads to competency. Flexibility must be trained, the mind must be mastered so that
our actions are ever-improved. The escape gets us in-tune with this, but training perpetuates it all
into a natural rhythm. Organic, optimized homeostasis is health
2. How do we find happiness yet accept it as a momentary chemical balance? How do we
cope with lost love, or a love that never existed but should have? How should we deal with the
failings of the past and its compounded regrets? It feels like we’re doomed to regress and never
change. And yet, there is always hope, even if it lies as distant as the faintest night star. There is
always something that can be done, if we see with eyes unclouded and toil with hands unchained.
There is always a choice, you’re not powerless, and something can be done with enough dedication.
Instead of waiting for something to change, you should first change yourself. To find answers for
the questions at this paragraph’s start, or for how to improve oneself, there is no straight-forward
solution – only a technique to help you find your own solution. Realization and actualization come
 35

from discovering the amalgamated baseline of human nature and natural law, not through certain
or sundry philosophies.
No moment is or should be considered an intermission between things we want to do. Every
act is a choice, every moment: a truth. Everything one does, or subjects themselves to, one has
consented. We can choose to maintain a gaze on the horizon, our eyes fixed to the future, to the
awaiting ‘real life’, when we actually begin; or we can accept every immutable moment, now, as
what existence is about, with everything else egging us to make the next a better one, even in
failure to do so.
3. Life is fluctuation – nobody finally ‘gets it’, we just move about a scenery and learn
more. One day we might find something that excites our hopes and imagination. The next day,
depression overwhelms us. One hour we might feel that this is our life and others just happen to
be in it. The next hour we might feel as though we’re a figment of someone else’s dream. Emotions
flow over our reasoning capacities like lapping waves. We may fully plan our lives and diligently
work toward that end, but then, like tidal changes, we don’t know what we want or where we’re
going next. In an instant, all at once, everything can change, and we should not deny it, whether
its favorable or unfavorable. We look back and realize the plurality of partially informed,
unprepared choices brought us here and we’re constantly correcting our course. Remember that
every adult is an experienced child, and every child an innocent adult and neither really knows
what’s going on.
Uncertainty is the norm of all existence, with certainty found only in absence. The Modern
Phenomenon, however, operates on such precise calibrations that people come to expect many
satisfying conditions as inherent to existence when none of them are, let alone certain. This breeds
a warped understanding of existence in reality. Humanity is not a species to be ‘satisfied’ by
anything, for even the anxiety of satisfaction’s possible removal brings its end. No matter what the
standard or circumstance, human beings will always complain at the slightest reversal, and, no
matter what the environment might imply, the eternal conditions are always subject to change.
We should not seek out a prolonged, eternal satisfaction of joy and composure but instead
search for the fortitude to endure and overpower dissatisfaction, strife, and failure. Also, to only
seek out the favorable of existence is to avoid the unfavorable, which we should and must acquaint
ourselves with from time-to-time if we are to grow. Furthermore, if we’re only able to endure
during satisfaction, we would hardly be worthy of existence, which is struggle against struggle.
Hardened maturation must now be deliberately chosen in the norm of petty infantility. Whereas
the degenerate refuses to accept limitations, responsibility, and the rigors of adulthood and so seeks
to maintain an adolescent mentality of control, a Real Human Being sets their mind forward and
allows the transcendent chrysalis to envelope their evolution.
Enlightenment, apotheosis, complete virtue, perfection – these are impossible. Only
through understanding our limits, testing them, and balancing the equation, can we achieve any
semblance of optimization and progress. All else which sacrifices one aspect of human nature or
reality for something favorable will inevitably succumb. The horizon is littered with utopian
mirages, but only by looking up and within will one see the Cosmos and understand one’s place.
Stop being purposely distracted, disinformed, and divided – be strong, embrace the struggle,
embrace the absence that preceded you. Train, study, and go into the world, for improving oneself
is only half the struggle – the other half is improving the environment. Any halting or stagnation
only benefits the usurpers who made it requisite to step aside and rediscover humanity in the first
place.
__________
 36

V
The New American Citizen

After one is educated and trained to the extent that they can continue to individually instruct
themselves; only then should one step into the social sphere to restructure the abstraction, to mold
the environment in their own image. By supporting an American program for Traditional Values,
Reformed Prosperity, and Conservation of Western Heritage, one can achieve a setting that will
lessen the strain needed for virtue, liberty, and honor, and mold something sustainable and self-
sufficient. In the part to follow, I hope to lay the foundation for a political movement based in
prioritizing and redefining citizenship so as to negate degeneracy’s effect. What is disclosed below
is a ‘weaponization’ or ‘eschatological-crusader vision’ of the above textual premises.
1. Current Political Issues
1. In industrial democracies, there exists two primary, opposed views: the ‘Left Wing’ view
of social progress, and the ‘Right Wing’ view of traditional cycles. Their disagreements stem from
conflicting notions and dissimilar definitions of the threefold sways with the former being much
more aligned with the equality and materialism of the Modern Phenomenon, and the latter aligned
with the deep-spirituality of historical humanity. The Left generally ignores tradition and
moderation in favor of artificial substitutes, attracting those who do not benefit best from natural
inequalities. This is why we find much more oversocialized, weak, and degenerate people on the
Left. The Right, however, finds it difficult to extend themselves to their maximum potential
because of their personal disposition, which impedes collectivization, even though they are
generally more individually capable.
On an imaginary line, plotting horizontally, with a center-point of medium attitude, we say
that there are more egalitarian views on the left, and more hierarchical views on the right. For the
American Left, moving from the more ‘radical’ to less so (left to center), we say that there is
Communism/Anarchy – ‘The Coalition’ – progressivism, and then liberal ideas represented by the
Democratic Party. For the American Right, moving from the more radical to less so (right to
center), we say that there is Fascism/Libertarianism – ‘The New-Right’ – populism, and then
conservative ideas represented by the Republican Party. The liberal and conservative are more
neutral, diluted philosophies that have numerous similarities, being so close to the center, and are
much more currently relevant than historically represented.
2. Both the conservative Republicans and the liberal Democrats are controlled by the elites
to push certain agendas that encroach on traditional American values and freedoms. Essentially,
the United States has a one-party system with two faces: either you support Globalism (Democrats)
or Zionism (Republicans), but either way, the disproportionately Jewish elite-interests win the vote
– democracy is rule of the majority over the minority, and the majority is easily influenced by
media, no matter which corner of it you favor. Elites have divisively consolidated against citizens
through the conservative-liberal dichotomy by giving the illusion of choice between one of the two
controlled positions. But, to some extent, and particularly recently, people have realized that this
dichotomy is counter-productive to advancing their political interests, and so we see more-and-
more (likely due to the proliferation of information that was once inconvenient to access or totally
hidden) an emphasis on the peripheries of the political spectrum. In a parallel move, the elites have
also advanced to shift the parameters of acceptable behavior by retracting from the Right to give
more room to the Left as this emphasis on the peripheries has threatened their hegemony. For their
benefit: the Coalition is in vogue and the New Right is deemed old-fashioned – both the poster-
 37

child and villain of media depictions. Since these two seem to be the future of political opposition,
it is important to understand them and their failings so as to accurately assess how best to politically
approach the crisis of the Modern Phenomenon.
3. The Coalition has already been discussed some before in terms of constituent elements
and general, degenerate tone, but it deserves a more in-depth analysis of how it politically behaves.
Firstly, the primary characteristic that unites The Coalition under one task is the delegitimization
of Western culture/accomplishments/values, and the moral supremacy of non-white-males. They
always use ‘white’ as a descriptive pejorative to show their disgust at something they consider
either vacuously elitist or simplistically bucolic – to them, ‘white’ means ‘rigid’, ‘bland’, or
‘unfavorable’; and similarly, ‘masculine’ denotes an exclusive oppressiveness. Secondly, they do
not respect personal rights and responsibility, instead favoring the abstraction’s ability to
redistribute property and bestow equality of outcomes. By hijacking ideas of non-violence, justice,
and empathy, a group that would otherwise be eternally subjugated or removed attains a stake at
the table. Thirdly, they are fatalistic in that they cannot create their favorable, they can only destroy
their unfavorable or appropriate the favorable of another. Beauty and ugliness, love and hate, joy
and sadness, life and death, hot and cold – whatever we might favor is impossible without the
veracity of its opposite; but degenerates want only what they want without respecting the balance
necessary for it.
Being against discrimination is its own form of discrimination – the freedom to associate
includes the prerogative to ostracize. Similarly, if all are equal, none are exceptional – to have
winners, there must be those who lose, and to deny the contest is to deny progress, evolution, and
all that makes humanity exceptional and valid. There is always a downside, even to very well-
intended, egalitarian ideas; and these particular downsides do not outweigh the upside of those
ideas they hope to overcome. And when they say ‘diversity is our strength’, they mean ‘diversity
of views’ or ‘diversity of experience and knowledge’. Certainly, though, no one would think that
asking a veterinarian for advice on drafting skyscraper blueprints would be beneficial whatsoever.
Similarly, no one would consider the views of a shrimp fisher when preparing for a runway fashion
show, or a physicist consulting a shaman. So what people mean by ‘diversity of opinions’ does not
entail an all-inclusive consideration. Neither is the word ever used in any context except to mean
the forced proximity of different races/cultures, so obviously the justification of ‘including all
viewpoints’ is to change the focus away from the true intent: invasive multiculturalism.
Promiscuity, infidelity, miscegenation, disrupts fundamental unities between group members and
leaves the self dissatisfied, while fidelity, inter-racial relationships, and modesty create long-term
fulfillment and community cohesion.
When the only influence they have is through self-victimization, they cannot win. When
their only power is through language control, they cannot win. When the only voice they have is
from social media and news networks, they will lose. And by not getting what they want soon
enough, or by being opposed even slightly, they will resort to violence and chaos. By resorting to
those ends, they sew the seeds for their own downfall, because the natural balance will prompt
others to offset their unsustainability. So in their push to seize control through violent means, they
will also push those in the middle or on the Right to coalesce – which has always been the weakness
of the Right in their individuality. The Left’s incessant boundary-pushing and their worship of the
authority of ferocity as salvation drives people who do not inherently want stern views or violent
competition, to view them as the only deliverance from the hydra, and the only tools to combat it.
When moderation is vilified, children of honor are forced to rear themselves toward opinions that
society deems ‘extreme’ or ‘radical’. The only reason they are seen as such is because people have
 38

been told those flames were extinguished long ago, never realizing the coals always glow, even in
the most compromised soul.
There are a very certain set of circumstances that must be maintained for the Left to be
successful. These are met, namely, when truth and the natural order are suppressed, and weakness
able to politically exert itself, typically only possible in democratic structures in urban
environments, which are fonts of deviances because the environment requires interdependence,
and tolerance. However, for the Right to be successful, all that must exist is the universal order.
The Left is the exception to the rule, not the norm of reality or politics, whereas the Right has
existed for the overwhelming majority of human endeavors, since our species has only recently
disconnected from nature.
4. Despite the philosophical failings of the Left, they have succeeded in practical terms,
meaning that the Right has lost up to now. The Right has failed to engage new generations outside
of the religiously conservative because the Left offers them a much more self-gratifying existence
– all the Right offers are guns and Jesus, which the media has made very unpopular to endorse.
Even more vilified are the traditional values of the Right, occidentally past the conservative, which
have consistently been portrayed as unfashionable for the past seventy-five years by an out-of-
focus and dark-tinted lens. Worse still, the Right has failed to remedy or challenge this whatsoever
and has defensively given ground time-after-time. By residing in negative media depictions, the
Right has effectively surrendered the urban and suburban voters and exiled itself into the rural,
where attachment to nature is strongest. These strategic blunders encompass failed spirituality in
the present, blindness from the past, and immoderated hope for the future.
5. By unsuccessfully attempting to propagate meaning against the nihilism of the Left,
despite the simplicity and necessity of the task, the Right has forced itself to stagnate in the
countryside, whereas it could expand infinitely if properly coordinated. Reliance on religion has
retarded the Right’s appeal, allowing the entire ideological movement to decompose into a
cadaverous atrophy of its former strength. Not that religion is unfavorable or useless or unneeded,
but it has been dogmatically and unnecessarily used to justify Right-wing beliefs to the point that
the two have become near inseparable. This was not always, should not currently, nor needs to be,
in the future, the case. But by needing religion, particularly Christianity, to justify traditional
values, they have bound themselves to something that has been vanishing for half-a-century. If the
Right was somehow able to discard their dependence on religion, it would become unstoppable
because the only other way to justify more conservative, traditional values is through principles
grounded in biology and history, which are more difficult to counter and far easier to accept.
Atop all this, the American religion, Christianity has retrograded from austere dominance
to lackadaisical thinning and failed to coalesce the people under one spiritual destiny. Christianity
has stepped away from natural law and human nature for a number of reasons. Firstly, the more
one studies the Universe, the less that a specific religious faith seems plausible, particularly those
that originated in civilizations thousands of years ago – though they very truly have insightful
wisdom, they are not wholly fact. Secondly, from this, as science has pushed the frontier of
knowledge where deity has always resided, religions have had to either shrink back into a
fundamental rejection of science or open themselves to the point of dissipation. Thirdly, neither of
these ‘solutions’ were evolutionarily advantageous for religious institutions because the former is
unattractive and the latter is leads to practical absence. This has further led to a significant waning
in spirituality in the West, which has led to an almost wholesale abandonment of traditional values,
aided by the elite’s global interests. On the one hand, you have blind dogmatism as a last defense,
and on the other, you have a lessening of standards to appeal to anyone through consumerism.
 39

Neither have succeeded in attracting new generations to Christianity, and, in fact, they have had
the opposite effect.
6. This is tied to the Right’s obsession with the past and inability to pragmatically work
toward a united future. The Right is trapped within the parameters laid out by the elites, confined
by labels, terminology, and the safety of conservative ideas. They are failing to formulate realistic
objectives and definitive direction because they are unable to move around the board as they see
fit, which leaves them no choice but to languish frozen in the restrictive ideas, symbols, and culture
that is prepared for them. This prevents the Right from addressing the changing demography of
the West, deriding unchecked technological advancement, and most importantly it completely
blinds them from the true enemy: the elites. As stated above, it is very difficult to get the Right to
coalesce under one identity and mission – but were it ever achieved, it would be utterly
indominable and able to be stopped only by its own ambition.
7. So if the only choices are a degenerate Left or a secluded, dogmatically restricted Right,
we remain, purposefully, with indignation and defeat. Where are we to appeal to when those in
power remain so by allegiance to ideas and institutions opposed to organic and optimized ends? A
god? A hero? . . . People are unbelievably desperate for a new messianic figure to reach out to
them in their personal, petty lives and pull them up to the cosmic-scale of social reformation. In
their desperation, they attach themselves to anyone even slightly against-the-grain or interesting,
even when these figures invariably come to stand in-line with the values of the same degenerate
structure that has so plagued the people to the point of hoping for salvation from it. Whether the
hopeful messiah is produced whole-cloth by the abstraction to pacify the sentiment of revolution;
whether they are converted by luxury into leading their followers back into the embrace of
degeneracy; or whether the figure was completely oblivious in the first place and only paying lip-
service to a ‘neat idea’, the cause of initial frustration is never resolved or even worked against
meaningfully, for the effort is always undermined by the misdirection, schisms, and passivity of
these hopeful figures. The only true revolutionaries and heroes are either never spoken of or
portrayed as an absolute villain.
And so, the Right has failed.
2. Consolidating the New Right
The people must be awakened, but we cannot sit idly hoping for a demigod to burst forth
from the sky and shower the globe with truth and drive. All other institutions and ideas have failed,
and the failures of our grandparents to win the culture war, along with the emasculated Neo-
Conservative and Republican route, have forced our generation to be more radical and reliant on
one another. We must work tirelessly toward reformation ourselves, preparing for the now
inevitable revolution which must come. To facilitate this, the American Right’s three main
priorities should be to: 1) – unite under one ideological identity and objective; 2) – combat media
disinformation by taking the offensive and mass-producing narrative propaganda; and 3) – advance
policies that remove power from degenerates and restrict their influence and that of the elites. In
essence, an alliance must consolidate against the Coalition to decintivize people from convenient
immoderation so that they will have to confront and embrace the natural order.
1. ‘Uniting under one ideology’, one abstract identity, means that the New Right must be
conscious of whose interests and survival are at stake. That the heritage of the Western World,
which created the political and economic systems that characterize the American way, are
inseparable from the history of white Europeans. That the common values necessary to perpetuate
those systems are only able to be accepted by people predisposed to the, and that the promulgation
of those values is dependent on the collaborative association of those able to. That individuals
 40

predisposed to degenerative processes will endorse them, and that there are quantifiable
characteristics that can determine one’s propensity to degeneracy, primarily based in race.
Therefore, for the New Right to unite, it must be racially conscious and based in the identity,
values, and interests of whites.
Uniting under a singular identity means that the movement must be led by whites for
whites. Furthermore, it must acknowlede that there are those who favor the survival of white
people and their cultural values, and those who do not. We must have those who align with the
former as participants and allies and oppose the ends of those in the latter camp. White people
have intentionally and consistently put aside their own interests in the hope of bringing up
everyone else to their level and consistently failed. If we do not start acting as a single political
bloc with one will, one identity, and one immutable set of interests, the European peoples will
succumb to those races we have attempted to aid – for we should not expect minorities to treat us
with the same civility when we take their minority place and they take our majority. And since
helping whites shake loose the elite’s yoke does not collectively benefit minorities or the elites,
we cannot expect them to join us, and therefore we must focus our efforts on whites; though we
cannot afford to begrudge those non-whites who ardently support us, for the European spirit is just
as essential as European blood.
Though we are all human and as American citizens share some basic values, it is the
different programming we are genetically encoded with that determine much of our political
behavior. Whether we are male or female, or white, black, Asian, Hispanic, Arab, etcetera, our
voting patterns and values are determined by our differences. By correlating different biological
traits we can see how, generally speaking in a meritocracy: race = class = political affiliation =
sexual mores = aesthetic tastes = spiritual beliefs. But as long as the European aptitude is honestly
accepted, there should be no issue with inviting the individual to aid the ends of the New Right.
Denial of those who fail to accept, however, will be something whites will need to relearn along
with a host of other ideas that they have been taught to deem ‘wrong’ through our domesticated
demeanor of amiability (as selected for by civilization). To ensure our ideas have an evolutionary
advantage against the Coalition, who adapts any tactic that works, the New Right must seek out
utility, virility, and adaptability, not rigid fragility or sterility; this even means embracing identity
politics, even if goes against the core values of a republic.
If you refuse to play identity politics, you will lose; if you do not practice ethnocentrism,
those races that do will overcome you – it does not make it ‘right’ or ‘good’, but necessary to
compete against those who hold the authority of ferocity above all else. When we splinter into
many separate identities and embrace a more tribal sense of things, we are much more likely to
inflict illogical violence. However, if others are embracing these ideas, it forces the hand of those
who would rather not by painting the target on their back. Sooner or later, whether whites want o
or not, they will be forced to find a racial identity or whither. Regardless, it is much more in-line
with human nature to behave differently with one’s abstraction (more amiably when in-line, more
shameful when out) whether or not it is ideal. Furthermore, there is a reason that ethnocentrism
outperforms all other models of in-group/out-group morality – because it allows for greater
cohesion and bounded cooperation, and is, frankly, the baseline of evolutionary anthropology. The
selfish, the blindly altruistic: these are much more limiting than ethnocentrism: the former because
it impedes abstraction, the latter because it dissipates goodwill blindly rather than concentrating it
biologically. If you do not play the game, you will be out maneuvered by those who do. Affinity
for one’s race over others is as ‘wrong’ as giving one’s family special treatment, yet people will
still see it as unfavorable because of the elite’s programming.
 41

Media does not begrudge us a racial identity or traditional values when it is to mock us,
blame us, or demand reparations. Only when whites begin to see the favorable of our culture and
heritage are we told to stop immediately! – Or risk becoming a pariah. They’re all for unhealthy
displays of sexuality and violence, of dishonest masculinity and fraudulent femininity, but the
moment one begins to adhere to modesty, moderation, and natural displays of committed love with
traditional values, they will instantly shut it down or mock it. They will attempt to limit your appeal
by labeling you an intolerant individual connected to a larger ideology of hate. They will mock
you, ridicule you, shame you, and reprimand you for beliefs you do not hold because they see how
your truth threatens the foundation of their throne. Their ‘moral appall’ means nothing because
labeling knowledge as hateful, divisive, or censoring people for their beliefs only showcases their
fear and refusal of a nuanced truth. They will allow anything as long as it is does not express
traditional values or independent dignity – only LARPs are allowed. And in the wake of pop-
culture’s use of predictable ‘diversity’ and sub-par values, white people have turned to other pre-
packaged genres to find their identity, splintering it into: hipster folk, angry punk/metal, placid
video games, foreign anime, etcetera . . . This must end.
2. For the New Right and whites to make progress, it is imperative and requisite for survival
that racial identity, political identity, aesthetic identity, and spiritual beliefs all more-or-less align,
as they once did. Before, we disagreed on the how, but we mutually believed in the why and what.
Now: where is the meaning, where is the purpose? Where are the great works and social projects
that propel humanity toward new frontiers? Where is the optimism and comradery at achieving
national goals? . . . There are no goals to achieve. We are without purpose, without any sense of
direction. We exist to care for other peoples and give them what our ancestors earned. And unlike
the Coalition, we do not need fantasy to see our meaning and purpose or take pride in our identity
– we only need to look at history and apply it to the present. With the shared identity of European
Americans partaking in the frontier/pioneer/homesteader culture, we can work toward a shared
objective of political reassertion of traditional Western values by and for whites.
For the New Right and whites to make progress, it is essential to embrace traditional values
as a ‘counter-culture’ to that of Hollywood. Since the environment has excluded Right-wing ideas
underground, the general attitude is already favorable to this; but to propel it into greater public
awareness will take a more deliberate and coordinated effort. A broad, confederated network must
form of grassroots groups that have access to a central hub of ideological and financial support by:
1) – condensing what already exists through some ‘congressional communication’ that brings
preexisting, larger organizations together to determine how to quantifiably advance; and 2) –
individually inaugurating small ‘clubs’ to discuss politics, do community service, help the poor,
organize weekend events and parties, visibly protest pride parades and other such demonstrations,
etcetera, with the subtext of socializing sympathetic whites. Regardless, to become acquainted
with one another locally is so vital it cannot be overstated or overachieved.
And to meet in-person once is better than chatting ten times over the internet. People now
worry more about what they can achieve online over what they can achieve in the world of the
living, namely because the latter is more difficult than the former and does not gain as much
attention. One vocalized scoff in the real world is worth more than an entire online blog, and one
physical political meeting is worth more than an entire website, and a protest is worth more than a
meme war, and an assassination is worth more than the entire internet – because if you are aware
of information and know what must be done, but you continue to argue semantics, aesthetics, and
idealism within an echo-chamber, than what good is that knowledge? Actions truly do speak louder
than words, but not only are they a meaningful measure of what you truly believe, but also of how
 42

you want the world to move. The ability to instantly express your opinion to the world has left the
vast, vast majority as all talk. We must bring action to the table.
To aid in the organization efforts, it is critically important to present ourselves as well-
mannered, well-dressed, and with a unified goal. The name of the organization, the logo, the flag,
the accoutrements – none of it matters as much as its existence, virility, and day-to-day presence.
Yes, there must be a genuine aesthetic movement for the New Right, rather than its history of
kitsch insolvency, but you must have a strong body to drape fashionable clothes over, not merely
a mannequin. Yet if you walk nude onto the street, you should not expect someone to follow you.
This is why The New Right must work very carefully and precisely to create their own aesthetic
form and project it to the masses in opposition to the media.
3. ‘Combatting media’ means both endorsing alternative media (content-sharing internet
sites) and generating a network of artists and researchers to craft impactful propaganda in
opposition to the mainstream narrative of the Modern Phenomenon. Anywhere that free-speech is
allowed to be expressed without ostracism, right-wing beliefs will naturally follow, (because they
organically out-compete opposed ideologies) and so we must facilitate an appropriate
environment. This means both gardening already existing life along with introducing new species
to vegetate the barren ecosystem, terraforming it into something productive for our ends, for the
environment will not suddenly and dramatically change as is needed. The best way to fertilize this
endeavor is to have comprehensive or fleshed-out ideas in a printed format that inform or otherwise
aid the primary audio-visual incubators. The primacy of aural entertainment is due to its general,
mass favorability due to its convenience and familiarity.
Music is historically and biologically important to group-cohesion because of the
vibrations that emanate from it. When everyone is being affected by the same vibrations, they
behave and think similarly and they either dance religiously or become affected by a catatonic
piety. Similarly, other forms of art draw the mind to immaterial ideals and meditatively elevate
awareness beyond sensory experience. Film, for example, being the penultimate coordination of
all prior art disciplines, is also imperatively vital to master and employ with its cathartic, emotional
impact. To utilize these elements for a defined, harmonious solidity is fundamentally essential for
any movement or group. If possible, they should be cheap, and ideally they would be free for
anyone interested. Regardless, these artistic endeavors must be experimental, idealistic, and
appealing. To attract different people, the styles should be varied, also catering to internal
denominational divisions, though all imbuing the same general ideas with different tones, just as
one fashion model can be the template for numerous outfits.
These ideas must be able to be accepted by the least or most intelligent, and strike fervor
within all. They must be managed by auteurs and professionals, not politicians or businessmen.
They must teach people the difference between the truth, an opinion, and a lie by discrediting and
destabilizing the media. They must encourage, channel, and redirect the same energy that is
currently directed at sports and pornography to ends that benefit our favorable. They must unite
whites under one ideology, one banner, one truth, one vision, and one will. They must show
temperance between idealism and practicality – between what should be, what is, and what is
actually possible. They must elevate concepts of organic and optimized human potentiality by
appealing to traditional values and archetypes with verisimilitude – myth, allegory and parable
(even if only on the subconscious level) with realism. They must give reasons and grant moral
permission for why expressing racial identity is favorable, valid, and legitimate. They must hyper-
proselytize without disinformation, or a pretentious or dry tone by being entertaining first and
 43

propagandizing second. They must not lie, for we do not need to stoop to the level of our opponents
because the truth is with us. They must coerce such questions as:
* How is diversity a strength, or people of different identities and values living
around each other inherently good?
* Why do homogenous societies consistently outperform heterogenous societies in
metrics of happiness, trust, and safety?
* Can any benefit of diversity be quantified or statistically measured to show
significant social benefit?
* Why should only Western Nations be diversified, regardless of outcome – and
doesn’t that make ‘diversity’ synonymous with ‘displacing whites and their
values’ or ‘anti-white demography’?
* If all differences between peoples are only ‘skin-deep’ or cultural, where did those
phenotypic differences or cultural values originate from in the first place?
Furthermore, why can anthropologists determine race, sex, and age based on skull
size and bone density?
* If racial difference are only ‘skin deep’, how do we explain disparate scores in
the Fixation Index between geographically separate groups? Furthermore, why
are there inequal genetic distributions of near-human species, such as the
Neanderthals and Denisovans, between races?
* Why should we assume intelligence and temperament are not inherited when we
expect such differences between dog breeds, even after training?
* Since Western Civilization was constructed over millennia by and for white
Europeans, why should we expect other people to succeed within it – even though
Asians outperform whites on average?
* Why do democratic political structures consistently struggle and collapse
everywhere outside the Western World?
* Why would we assume that people from outside the Western World would be
able to integrate well into a democratic society when their societies did not endure
the same circumstances which led to those structures?
* Why would non-whites flock to Western Civilization (or why wouldn’t those
already here flee) if it was inherently unfair or racist?
* If gender is a choice or a social construct, why do chromosomes exist, and why
are male and female physiology so distinct?
It must also engage people on an individual level by personally prodding introspection on current
circumstances by asking:
* Why should I expressly work against my own interests for the benefit of those I have no
similarity to?
* Why is it considered inherently ‘right’ to want others of radically different values to come
together and live near one another?
* Why is it considered morally reprehensible to shame or work against those who subvert
my culture with their own?
* How can I, as an individual, defend my beliefs about liberty against a collective opposed
to them unless I join a ‘group of individualists’?
* Would I rather live in a nation created and steered by whites, or one created and steered
by another race? . . . Who has the historical track-record I prefer? . . . If I prefer whites,
why would a agree with globalized or anti-white ends? If I prefer non-whites, then why
 44

would I want to live in the United States when there are plenty of other non-white nations
and even other white nations?
Winning against degenerates means making their behavior unattractive and ruining its current
appeal as liberation or a complete identity expression. Winning against degenerates means making
our behavior and ideals attractive by showcasing it as logically-driven and emotionally fulfilling.
4. This means it must be appealing to men and women alike. By propagating an idea of
biologically honest and philosophically consistent masculinity, the new media will give an
alternative and ideal to otherwise degenerated and fantasy-driven males. By showcasing the virility
of what we believe and have achieved through anthropological understanding, it will attract men
to improve, which will further attract women. Conversely, the movement’s media portrayals must
not succumb to depicting women solely as domestic mothers or trophies but give an illustration in
accordance with their own innate desires and ability, without pandering. The modern woman’s
desire for ambitious independence is an evolutionary aversion to the apparent alternatives: relying
on degenerate men or using sex to perpetuate existence though pleasure attachment. We must
display our alternative with respect to their situation.
There must be attractive and intelligent men and women in complimentary masculine and
feminine roles – both with agency and a synchronized relationship structure of trust, aid, sexual
mutuality, family-building, and general companionship. If men want women to stop being so
promiscuous and apathetic toward long-term relationships, they must prove they are worthy and
capable of being sole partner by being shown such a portrayal. If women want men to stop viewing
them as sex-objects or something to conquer, they must prove they are able to provide genuine
care and support by being shown such a portrayal. It must give straight, sexual faithfulness a
positive and attractive depiction.
In a very similar way, the relationship between the races must not be depicted as inherently
antagonistic, but as a failed marriage – both tragic in the failure to live together, but not necessarily
excluding friendship living apart; only that the relationship cannot continue to exist in its present
state. It cannot be forgotten that there is only one enemy: the degenerate, expressed in many various
forms. It just so happens that degeneration for the stability of the Western model is expressed in
predominantly racial terms. As stated above, we have no moral or political reason to turn away
non-whites who truly agree with our sentiments of racially differences and favorability to
traditional Western valies and the media depictions should show how the Right approaches this
relationship for those on the inside and those looking from the out.
As always, though, it should showcase our movement’s supremacy over the mainstream
route and, if at all possible, attempt to be more attractive than it for minorities as potential partners.
It must express that the New Right does not want to be the enemy of non-whites or vice-versa, but
that we must defend the values of our own people first, because the systems we created depend on
it. If that sets us apart from them or they see this as wrong, we cannot help that. Being for yourself
or for a group does not intrinsically mean being against others, unless they feel unwarrantedly
entitled to your group. Not every villain must be some minority, not every hero must be a white
male, and not every arc needs to be one of dominance.
Overall, people are mentally programmed predominantly through pop-culture. Their day-
to-day, hour-to-hour, minute-to-minute existence is processed through referential call-backs,
whether it is in interpersonal conversation topics, mood comparisons with fictional characters, or
a mental ‘white noise’ of songs, images, and opinions they have been force-fed. So when these
impressions are in praise of diversity, equality, and hedonism, thus will the masses believe. When
a coordinated alternative arises that attractively praises traditional values, human nature, natural
 45

law, etcetera, then we will be exponentially more successful in organizing and proselytizing by
becoming competitive in the convenience-driven meme economy. It must be something people
want to watch or listen to or read, convincing them to engage more of our media alternative, and
eventually converting them away from the values of the Modern Phenomenon with our own
superior model. It should introduce them to the ‘real world’ as a window searing through the
decadent and crumbling façade, without ever becoming consumeristic or dogmatic – always
focused on advancing our policies.
5. ‘Advancing policies’ means, firstly, that a significant portion of the Modern
Phenomenon arose from legislative decisions, and secondly, that these laws and rulings can be
undone with enough effort, thus dismantling enough of the system to impose the will of the New
Right in that breach. We’ve already seen how we should organize and how that organization should
create a competitively alternative cultural identity, (which are crucial) but we have yet to se how
the actual institutions that made the Modern Phenomenon possible might be opposed. The answer
is simple: rather than barring non-whites from voting or demanding a forced racial separation,
(both untenable policies) simply hold Western values to the highest degree, promoting earned duty
over entitlement and handouts, and restricting immigration. Make citizenship something that is
earned, cut welfare, and halt demographic shifts.
By forcing all people to earn political franchisement, if they so desire it, by proving their
ability to exist outside the physical level and into the abstract’s needs, they will be much more
likely to cast off their degenerate habits, leave, or not be politically involved. By forcing all people
to take care of themselves, or have a private, willing support network of charity, the tax-paying
masses will no longer fund degenerate and leech-like behavior. And by having potential
immigrants accept the future that they will not be taken care of for free, that they must integrate to
our standards, and that illegally immigrating will be severely punished, will force them to fully
become Americans or leave. These policies inherently decintivize degeneracy by reengineering
the environment to endorse a more self-reliant and earned existence through creating an exclusive
political involvement.
Instead of completely changing the standards, simply hold everyone to a higher set to
homogenize values and improve the quality of political actors. Trust, reciprocal morality, and
common belief in core principles are necessary for any abstract group to operate, but vital for a
civilized conglomeration and constantly essential in democracy. These vital traits do not exist in
an open, multicultural society. So, we must advance the policy of an exalted national identity in
language and citizenship participation parameters, rather than ill-defined openness. It is
commonality as physical principles of a greater abstraction. If unguided by a singular, cohesive
identity, diversity is not a strength – it is schizophrenia. And just as a triangle, circle, or square are
defined by their enclosing lines, so too must citizenship and its subsequent national identity be
something much more demarcated. The way to negate degeneracy’s effect on political operations
is to bar them from participation altogether, just as the way to negate degeneracy’s effect on the
social sphere is to remove all safety nets.
6. By granting citizenship by merit of birth alone, the state guarantees its abuse. The
Founding Fathers themselves believed that citizenship was not to be granted to everyone living in
America, but that enfranchisement was restricted to prevent imprudence with those who would use
power for mere personal aggrandizement. Since politics is the orchestration of the social sphere, it
is imperative to ensure that politically franchised individuals are capable of considering the greater
good. Though there are many proposed ways to test this ability, the ancient method of military
service fulfills all criteria and more. Requiring military service ensures: physical health,
 46

competency with firearms, appreciation for group-dynamic, strong work-ethic, and understanding
the cost of liberty, freedom, and citizenship by inducing them into a state-of-mind that perpetuates
the abstract over the physical in a positive and self-chosen way.
By maintaining a ‘welfare environment’, the state incentivizes lethargy, promiscuity, and
criminality by selecting for reproductive ability alone, not individual competence or traditional
values – all while still granting political power to propagate this further through incentivizing
voters to continue these policies. Welfare discourages responsibility and integration and has
allowed unsustainable behavior for generations. To add, white people supply the majority of
welfare and minorities take the majority of it. This was an intentional aspect of its creation to
deliberately ‘pay back’ non-whites for our ‘mistreatment’ of them. In essence, to make them equal
and bribe them to participate. It has had the opposite effect. Reliance on welfare has bred
generations of degenerates and allows for horrible reproductive habits with no detraction. Whites
are bribing minorities into not going feral with the positive reinforcement of welfare. Were it
removed, we would witness their true nature. Obliquely, for those who do desire to work, the
unchecked influx of unskilled immigrants has stagnated and even set-back wages by undercutting
the established workforce and making it difficult for the unskilled to learn through experience.
By making the nation less gratifying to potential immigrants, through the removal of as
much welfare as possible and improving immigration security, we prevent unnecessary burdens
on the housing/job market, national infrastructure, and tax-funded programs. In the same way that
you go to your job and return home, never considering your workplace and the coworkers there
your home or family, so too do many immigrants never consider America their home, its people
their fellow citizens, and its values as staples to live by and defend. They only see America as an
economic opportunity – one that will even give them influence and power of they shout loud and
often enough. Their religion, their country of origin, and their race are their where their true
loyalties lie. Many, if not most, are mere economic parasites who only see the United States as a
standard of living rather than a political entity with subsequent duties and non-material values.
Those on the Left have been more than happy to allow unhinged immigration and privileges for
illegal immigrants because on the surface-level this is a very tolerant, social policy. On a deeper-
level, it allows for Left-wing politicians to expand their favorable voting population by supporting
welfare programs that many immigrants need to survive. Yet the true intent is demographic
subversion and replacement, to undermine the West’s homogeny and create a new underclass, as
previously disclosed. None of these reasons benefit us . . .
If there are no consequences, there will be no care or effort, and those who would otherwise
respect natural order and make effort for better existence will find no cause to. These generalized
policies decentivize potential immigrants from coming to leech, encourage competency, and allow
degenerates to fail. By crushing illegal immigration with an unprecedented ferocity and by
restricting (but not completely stopping) legal immigration with direct legislation, supplemented
all by the oblique elimination of alluring welfare and gratifying political participation, we might
guarantee that America accepts those who are willing to integrate and add to our nation, not sap
from it. Economic and personal freedom should manifest, while the political structure that reigns
over it should be heavily restricted and regimented.
7. One other point should be made to counter the one-dimensional, ‘knee-jerk’ response
that has consistently failed: that whites must eliminate, hate, or somehow domineer over other
races. Let it be unequivocally stated: there is nothing this text endorses less than that idea, but
nothing it endorses more than for every race to be racially-conscious and take pride in themselves.
Just as you should want whites to be the best they can individually and collectively be, so too
 47

should the desire arise that blacks become their best selves, or Asians, or Arabs, or Hispanics,
etcetera, etcetera. Anyone who believe this text proports contrary does not understand what’s been
laid out regarding race and ethnic character. I do not believe in a ‘master race’ or that other races
are ‘lesser’ – I believe that the races are different and that true diversity comes from experiencing
those differences separately and at their best, not stewing them together into one subpar admixture.
The elites want everything for themselves with an underclass of hybridized mulattos for labor.
They certainly do not want racial consciousness or nationalism, let alone pride in one’s biological
identity as a basis for self-improvement. We, however, do.
We want blacks to be for blacks and to steer away from the ‘approved’ identity, where the
highest goal is to rap or play sports; always working for someone else, always chasing after the
mirage they dangle, never reaching financial independence or researching beyond the default
outlets. Similarly, we want Hispanics to be for themselves, Asians to be for themselves, Arabs to
be for themselves, Jews to be for themselves, and so on, all uniting where we can. Every race must
deny victimhood, embrace agency, resist the false song of corporate salvation, and strive for the
non-material of their own programming. Let this stand as a testament against accusations that this
philosophy is ‘racist’ or ‘prejudiced’: the movement that is to be, that must be, must admire the
best of all races and deplore the worst; holding that happiness, productivity, and distinct heritage
must be kept separate to be kept sovereign. We believe in the true diversity, the only diversity that
can exist and has existed: the diversity of mutually-respectful separation. To deprive someone of
their own culture by forcing them into a larger culture forces them to forge a new identity in
opposition to that replacement.
That said, many do not want whites to be for themselves, and seeing a white take pride in
their identity and defy the stereotypes of classless hick and bland elitist makes many minorities,
particularly Jews, very uneasy. When a white person believes in their heritage and act nobly on it
– precisely what we wish for all peoples! – they attempt to shame us. Non-whites enjoy humiliating
whites by portraying them as emasculated because it mocks their one-time ruler, and the elites are
more than happy to facilitate this image en masse because it helps them breed apathy and
antagonism toward and among whites, shaming them into obedience with a bludgeoning cudgel.
That constant weight on the lid of the cage we’ve been led into is evidence that there is nothing
the elites fear more than a United Western Movement (and a hostility to its potentiality has been
imbued in their Coalition) because they understand that when whites have set their spirit to task,
there is nothing we cannot accomplish.
8. Our ancestral line stopped the indominable Persian Empire in its tracks. Our ancestors
expanded mathematics and the sciences over millennia, improving understanding beyond measure,
and, with it, vital standards of living. They survived the Black Death and the Mongol invasion.
They came to inhabit and overlord every corner of the globe. In the ashes of the Second World
War, our grandparents reached out to every population and brought up those it could, rebuilding
the world and freeing those they had dominated. We discovered and mapped the poles, and whites
are still the only race to ever have set foot on the Moon. Why? – Because we dare to: we are the
adventurous race, we are the innovative ones, we establish personal liberties to enhance the group,
we have comradery in open-minds and open-hearts.
Whereas the other races express one trait at the expense of others, whites are endowed with
an advantageous mean between them, a balance in intelligence, temperament, and physicality. We
are able to walk the line between abstract and physical through empathy. We are the moderated
race at the center of the spectrum. Just as other races have advantages over us, we have our own
advantages – and just as others should take pride in their advantages, so too should whites. Whereas
 48

others imitate to compete with us, we naturally, intuitively seek new horizons . . . Which is why
Western Civilization has been corrupted, and the potential of Europeans: stifled. Stifled by
employing our empathy and civility to chain ourselves, our technology to distract us, our freedoms
to coerce us – immoderation has weakened us, but not fully erased our power. Not yet. Not if we
embrace each other and the natural order that separated us from the other races, who are not
intrinsically our enemies, but who have been led by the elites to remove, replace, and destroy us.
Our ancestors endured unimaginable tribulations. So too shall we endure and overcome.
4. A Cohesive Program
1. We are in a race against the global elites: who will crush the other first? Will Western
Civilization be able to shake off the shackles of multiculturalism and collectively discern the
common enemy, or will the cunning subversion, financial manipulation, and cultural usurpation
of the elites win-out and propel them into the throne of an authoritarian technocracy? We are living
in an age where the stakes have never been higher – for failure will be total annihilation off all
ideals and values we have thus far shown to be organic, human, and optimal. In the stead of these
virtues will reign a global terror of pleasure wholly unknown in all recorded history before it. Our
kind will be reduced to animals, where only the favorable and unfavorable dynamic matters, and
no truths survive a generation. For the whole species, the entire planet, sits on the precipice of an
age of genetic manipulation, artificial intelligence, and demographical homogenization. This is it!
– This is the age, the hour of our greatest testing!
We should not expect to convert the Left from their reliance to the Modern Phenomenon,
for every addict always sees those attempting to help them as their enemy. Your complaints and
logic mean nothing to the adamantly subversive who only desire to replace the majority values
with their minority outlook. The Right and Left will never ‘get along’; there can only be dominance
by one and submission by the other – only then can all energy be focused against the true source
of conflict and degeneracy: the elite class. And since that is our ultimate goal, to restructure the
Modern Phenomenon from the bottom-up and top-down to a more traditionally organic hierarchy
(meaning that corporations and government would lose power, and the global elite would have
significantly less influence over American affairs) it truly means that the public will be employed
and impressed to throw hurdles in our way and disapprove of our values.
2. This is because once the people have awoken to the extent of and reason for their
comfortable complacency, the liars sharing the throne will be exposed and move harder than they
ever have before to push the people back down into subjugation – but instead of mistruths, it will
be through force. They will use their resources and connections unrelentingly to crush the rebelling
masses. This is why, somewhat counterintuitively, the movement would need to hope and prepare
for an ‘advantageous collapse’, which would accelerate the process of reformation by draining the
elites of their one asset and the tool of hiding it. In the wake of a financial/technological crash,
their idols will be shown to be false and plastic and their ability to defend them would be lessened.
To moderate the system, it cannot be simply washed clean, or have some decaying bricks
replaced. There can be only massive rebuilding – not mere exfoliation, but critical organ
transplants.
White people must be thrust out of their catatonic state by some earth-shattering event,
which brings reality crashing through the crystalline ceiling of the Modern Phenomenon, exposing
them to the hardships of the natural order and the relevance of human nature. Until the food
becomes scarce, or money is shown to be valueless, or crime infests the suburbs, there will be
inaction. We can only hope that the situation worsens to the point that whites as a whole realize
action must be taken. When the barriers to joining a movement such as this (lessened economic
 49

opportunity, social shame, lack of understanding through misinformation) are removed, only then
can we consolidate to our maximum potential. This can only happen in a soft-collapse. Only when
people are individually motivated – that is, selfishly rewarded – to revolt against the Modern
Phenomenon will the issue be resolved. Until the daily presence of degeneracy is felt as such by
personally experiencing its detractions daily, then there will never be a motivating impetus even if
there is an awakening.
3. There are other ways to achieve the goals of the New Right outside of historical means
– such as: programing a right-wing AI or somehow convincing an AI construct to advance
traditional values, or retreating from diversity into homogenously white communities that defend
their stake and traditions – but at this point, they do not seem as practical or realistic as the models
that are incumbent on violence. Nevertheless, every option must be sought for where one fails,
another progresses. And yes, of course, there must be a priority in enacting legislation that
effectively nullifies multiculturalism and elite subversion, (the victories of which can become
recruiting propaganda) but it must never be forgotten that if the New Right advances well and far,
a violent conflict will be forced by the elites. Another route which should be attempted is to elect
or otherwise influence governors or a President who would declare a ‘state-of-emergency’,
mobilizing military forces and governmental bureaucracy to wrest control of the economy from
the banks and control of the populace from the media. Lastly, and perhaps most worrisome in its
genuine possibility, is to engage in and win a civil war, purging all elite interests in the aftermath.
This seemingly insistent urging for violence is not out of a desire to see degenerates killed
or their handlers executed, but out of an unwilling acceptance of historical precedent. Just as the
forest is aided by burning underbrush, so too is the social environment able to rejuvenate and last
through a deliberate short-term setback. War sorts out irreparable differences between groups, and
so there must be war to sort this situation out. Furthermore, it is a characteristic of natural law that
all sanctioned institutions or powerful entities are derived not from deity, not from consent, not
from any rights or social contract, but from the ability of the strong to dominate the weak. All
logical disagreements, when found to be unresolvable, can only appeal to one, final end: the
authority of ferocity. This is why, also, we must be able to communicate what we stand for and
what we want so that we might increase our strength through homogenization, and so that in the
wake of what inevitable violence should come, we will be both ready at the onset and organized
at its end.
4. A dormant, hibernating force is awakening. It is a presence that demands transcendence
– a permutating affinity for reality and all its characteristics, conditions, and truths. There has been
a global resurgence of Right-wing vigor against degeneracy, which have all developed more-or-
less independently but are swiftly maturing into one global awareness of shared destiny. When this
entity finally congeals and is willing to act, it will usher in a new era for humanity, one where we
truly advance as a species and are not left perpetually wallowing in identity crises. By dismantling
traditional values, undercutting wages with mass-immigration, monopolizing technology, and
brazenly opposing the white race and Western Civilization, the elites have set the stage for a United
Western Movement that would reform the whole system once the slightest spark touches the floor.
Our honor and virtue, which has been kept in the shadows, will be brought into awareness, and the
degeneracy that has held the spotlight will be put back into the shadows where it rightfully belongs.
And there will at long last be balance again.
There are many futures that can exist. However, the only one that is practical and honest,
that adheres to reality, and that does not give itself over to machines, or genocide, or one singular
race of mutts is this: ethno-nationalism for all – in whatever form the people therein desire. All
 50

states should keep to themselves except in trade and punishing those who attempt to step outside
their bounds. This is the only way to ensure an international order that does not become artificially
evolved, without bankers and businessmen corrupting it, while maintaining racial and national
sovereignty in a push for competition and advancement without immoderation.
Were it possible to forever remove the incentives for industrial technology and affinity for
group-hierarchy, I would be an Anarcho-Primitivist. Were all races of similar physical,
intellectual, and temperamental constitutions and only bound by their environment, I would
believe in Multiculturalism Communism. Were the enemies of individualism disorganized and the
corporate prerogative more intrinsically altruistic, then I would promote a Moderate
Libertarianism. Instead, human nature and racial differences are solid, reality has immutable
natural laws about it, and the individual has selfish interests. Therefore, I see no anthropological
choice except through a radical and cohesive program.
5. Firstly, we must agree on certain principles so that in-fighting is minimized, upholding:
That despite vast, overwhelming similarities, there are still quantifiable biological
differences between the two sexes, between the various racial and ethnic groups, and between
individuals which must be acknowledged and respected for social progress to be made. Where
there is economic equality of opportunity, but inherent biological inequalities, there will be
inequality of outcome.
That moderation and non-aggression are the principles of sound personal and group
behavior, and that individualism and personal liberties create the best overall circumstances for
attainment of self-interest, retention of traditional values, social mobility, and social growth.
That the United States of America partakes in the heritage of Western Civilization, which
is comprised of a historical relationship of race and geography, forming unique aesthetic, moral,
political, and philosophical values. Furthermore, American culture is uniquely expressed by the
‘frontier atmosphere’ of adapting the old into a new environment: the pioneer, the homesteader,
the entrepreneur, and simple, traditionally organic nuclear-family values.
That many peoples will not be well-adapted to these values and should not be admitted into
the nation, and that, regardless, all immigrants should be Americanized, not the reverse.
That when opponents of these values conspire together against them, those who uphold
them must unite to combat the larger threat to their interests.
That pride in one’s identity does not mean hate for others, and that all different groups can
be amiable and cooperative if they accept one another’s sovereignty and unique heritage.
That the organization will support any American citizen that holds: (1) – ‘Freedom of
speech’ and ‘freedom of association’ sanction organizations such as ours, (2) – White Americans
of European ancestry should be allowed to propagate their race and interests, and (3) – The United
States should be internally concerned with the duties, privileges, and betterment of citizens rather
than foreign entanglement or hand-outs.
6. Secondly, we must agree on what sort of government we want in the future. From all the
above stipulations, a Hard-Libertarian Ethno-Republic should be advocated. That the public-
sphere of citizenship should be fraught with challenging stipulations for induction, and the private-
sphere of residency should be economically and socially free. That both spheres must be enclosed
by the notions of ‘freedom of speech’, that does not promote violence or commit fraud, and
‘freedom of association’, when it does not infringe on the freedoms of another group, along with
rights to property and life, is essential. Generally speaking, governmental influence must be
stripped to the bare essentials of upholding minimal laws, ensuring national defense, and allowing
 51

the free-market, the self-moderation of non-aggression, and personal inclinations to constitute the
majority of American happenings.
This system must be protected internally and externally from degenerate contrivances
which seek to supplant the individual with ‘group-rights’. This can be done by, firstly, by being
not simply born into a state of citizenship but initiated into a cult of political duty after passing its
mysteries. Secondly, by replicating the same challenges that a natural environment imposes by
creating a benevolent, synthetic selection of intrinsically well-equipped individuals by removing
welfare. Thirdly, by nationalizing the currency through removing the reliance of private banks
loaning credit to create money and simply having a new national bank do so for and by the people.
Fourthly, by reinstating the ‘constitutional militia system’ that facilitates citizen-soldiers over a
professional military that can be maneuvered across the globe by elite interests. And lastly, by
concerning itself with domestic betterment through the establishment of broader freedoms and the
removal of a century of misguided legislation. The way to remove unnecessary violence or force
is to allow a total social meritocracy with broad liberties, while allowing a very limited political
population of those who have earned it by proving their ability to behave and think critically and
civically through military service.
When people are free to make choices and allowed to face the consequences, they will
generally have to appreciate the full quasi-duality and will be forced to self-moderate. Liberty
ensures that freedom does not include immunity from consequences by placing the individual’s
fate in their own hands and the social fate in the hands of those able masses. And though more
authoritarian systems can undertake long-term projects more seriously, they also become more and
more self-blinded the more they advance. Generally, more democratic governments can better
adapt by facing reality and choosing step-by-step, rather than knowing only propaganda and
command.
7. Thirdly, we must agree on how to achieve the future government. There are two paths,
which should be equally sought:
The ‘executive path’ would be enacted by a temporary autocrat and a junta declared in a
state of emergency. Whether in the wake of some conflict or initiated through the foresight of a
capably high political office, this course endorses fascism as an intermediate form of government
– a means to a greater end. Since democracy can bestow political power to economic actors, it is
imperative to go into a short period of non-democracy to erase the faults that would be impossible
within normal democratic processes. This executively extreme individual and their council would
remove tertiary concerns, reorganize secondary matters, and rebuild the rubble of what had been
primary structures; after which, the new political sphere would be handed back to the people. The
military will be a vital arm of the operation, keeping the situation stable while the necessary
changes are made and protecting the reincarnated republic until it is weaned and the people
prepared to accept it. Policies that could be enacted by the temporary autocrat (which would be
much easier and unilateral to make concrete through the executive path) are also listed below.
The ‘legislative path’ would be enacted through normal democratic processes. These
policies generally support: a free-market without monopolies, a free-society without degeneracy,
and a free-self without aggression. Total freedom is total anarchy, but one can only be truly free
when encroaching restrictions are restricted. The following goals, once met, would balance the
country to prevent its total collapse from immoderated indulgence and inebriated tolerance by
instituting organic sustainability. The six following areas demand immediate and thorough
restructuring:
1. Citizenship / Immigration Policy Goals:
 52

a. Severely reduce annual immigrant intake to stricter standards that favor Europeans
with strong intellectual and moral constitutions and aspirations by:
i. Placing an indefinite moratorium on all immigration for fifty years
ii. Granting Green Cards to 1000 individuals per European nation* and 50
individuals per nation outside those parameters after the moratorium has been
lifted
* ‘European nation’ defined as including: all land bounded in the west by
the North Atlantic Ocean, bounded in the south by the Mediterranean
Sea, separating it from Africa, and bounded in the east by the Levantine
Sea, the Dardanelles, the Black Sea, and the Ural River as it meets the
Ural Mountains. The northern boundary of Europe is the Arctic Ocean,
but there are many islands in the eastern Atlantic, Arctic, and
central/western Mediterranean waters that are included in this definition.
b. Redefine citizenship to be more exclusive by requiring that it be meritocratically earned
by all through meeting three points (to go into effect for all those born two years after
being set):
i. Meet three of the following four pre-requisites (a, c, d OR b, c, d):
a. Be the child of two citizens
b. Have lived legally in US borders for five years with proof of continuous
work (whether the individual was born in the US or immigrated after
successfully applying for a Green Card)
c. Have a clean criminal record
d. Be 18 years or older
ii. Successfully complete a two-year term of military service after meeting both
prerequisites – no exceptions, no alternatives
iii. By becoming a US citizen, the individual must renounce all previous loyalties
to foreign governments and nations, excluding and ending dual citizenship
c. Establish complete, unmitigated control of entry into the US by:
i. Constructing a wall/permanent barrier on the southern, Mexican border
ii. Expanding patrols to more effectively halt and prevent illegal border crossings
and the illegal movement of drugs
d. Deport all illegal immigrants regardless of criminal status
e. Make English the official language of the United States, causing all government
information available in one, common tongue and compelling any interaction with the
state to be done in English alone
f. Ban foreigners from owning land/real-estate property (does not include residents or
Green Card holders)
2. Tax Policy / Financial Policy Goals:
a. Discard every form of taxation and limit the IRS, replacing all federal revenue with only
four systems of income:
i. A small, 2% ‘progressive consumption tax’ that is placed on all goods sold
within US borders
ii. An annual ‘land-value tax’ that taxes the value of the land, not the structures
built on it – as the assessed value of the land increases, due to its desirability,
so too does the tax
iii. Appropriate and fair tariffs on all foreign imports, favoring those from allied
 53

nations
iv. A 10% tax on the income of those who annually earn ten million dollars or
more
b. Dismantle the Federal Reserve system, replacing it with a nationally owned bank that
issues currency backed by precious metals, domestically-sourced natural resources, and
crypto currency
c. Terminate ‘charity programs’ and other involuntary public funds, including the Social
Security pyramid-scheme and Medicare, by:
i. Cutting all foreign aid down to ten million dollars total, annually
ii. Discarding all domestic welfare that is awarded to non-citizens and Green Card
holders
iii. Severely strip all welfare awarded to citizens, forcing the populace to care for
themselves except in extreme cases
d. Erase all debts owed by US citizens, forgiving them in the instatement of a new ‘Year
One’ for all financial matters
e. Remove any form of a ‘minimum wage’.
3. Corporate Policy Goals:
a. Regulate three monopolistic strangleholds from benefiting only the industry to
benefitting citizens and residents, such as:
i. Higher education, such as colleges, universities, and trade-schools, by granting
free higher-education to citizens who rank in the top ten percent of high-school
standards and ending federal grants to universities
ii. The pharmaceutical industry, particularly regarding life-saving medicine and
operations, by outlawing pharmaceutical patents
iii. The media consolidation of information, by breaking monopolistic trusts
b. Heavily deregulate and attempt to privatize as much as possible, by cutting the entire
Federal Register in half, thus encouraging the free market of competition and the
necessity of customer service, while discouraging outsourcing
c. Require mandatory E-Verify for all employers to ensure that wages are not undercut by
illegal immigrants or other persons unlawfully residing
d. End state-mandated ‘diversity hires’ and quotas for employers, thus allowing
employers to hire those who they deem best qualified
e. Reform patent and intellectual property laws by:
i. Making it illegal to patent any form of life whatsoever
ii. Making any copyrighted work or patent free to the public domain after only ten
years (except in the case of vital, secret information that must be protected for
national security reasons)
f. Make it illegal for corporations to give financial political contributions of any kind or
donating to campaigns
4. Military / International Policy Goals:
a. Facilitate international stability through the creation of a ‘Global Hegemony’, which
would replace NATO, the UN, and the G20 and which would:
i. Include the following ten nations: The United States of America, The People’s
Republic of China, the Russian Federation, Japan, the United Kingdom,
Germany, India, France, Indonesia, and Brazil
ii. Seek to build a common global language that would help international business,
 54

politics, and travel through more grounded communicative understanding

iii. Unilaterally oppose the proliferation of nuclear arms, genetic manipulation and
artificial intelligence until the ‘Hegemony’ deemed the world sufficiently
mature and united enough to not use them as weapons
iv. Seek to encourage national self-reliance globally rather than forcing democracy
or interfering to force some desired outcome
v. Encourage and develop national competition for space exploration and
colonization
b. End the ‘War in the Middle-East’ by bringing all servicemen and women home and
dismantling Arab bases
c. Mold the US military into a decisively defensive policy of non-aggression, but vicious
retaliation by favoring the ‘constitutional militia system’ over a professional Armed
Forces
d. Explicitly require that the President must approach Congress with specific, quantifiable
objectives for activating the Armed Forces whatsoever, and that a specific timeframe be
given to achieve them; and once those parameters are set, the expiration of the approved
operations are to be demanded and guaranteed
e. Foster a stronger cyber-security division that can more effectively engage enemies and
defend the US and allies.
5. Justice System Policy Goals:
a. Focus on ‘crimes of consequence’ though emphasizing the non-aggression principle by:
i. Only legislating criminal laws or prosecuting people that have a victim
ii. Focusing on proving who initiated aggression as exposing the guilty party
b. In cases of proven rape, non-defensive murder, or fraud exceeding $10,000:*
i. The criminal will be branded on the top of a hand of their choice with a
corresponding R, M, or F for the first offense
ii. In addition to branding, the convicted will spend up to ten years removed from
society in a prison
iii. After a second conviction of any of the three above crimes, the convicted
individual will be publicly executed
iv. Commuting a prison sentence for these crimes will not be deemed possible
* The predominant personality who would commit an aggressive crime is
one who seldom cares about moderation and exists with the authority of
ferocity primarily guiding. Therefore, issuing temporary consequences
will not discourage their behavior. Forcing shame and physical pain upon
them, and making the consequences of crime permanent, are the only
ways to keep their aggression at bay.
c. For other crimes and misdemeanors that require it, the convicted will spend no more than
one year in a jail and incur a fine of no more than $10,000
d. Prisons will be primarily concerned with two areas:
i. Isolating the criminal from society until they are adequately reformed
ii. Teaching them literacy and marketable job skills
e. Federally decriminalize all ‘soft’/psychedelic drugs, (cannabis, LSD, psilocybin)
6. Domestic Policy Goals:
a. Establish more restrictive parameters for public service by placing:
i. Term-limits on federal Congressmen and Congresswomen, limiting their
 55

capacity to a maximum of two terms, thus making career-politicians extinct

ii. Bans on both current or ex- intelligence agency (FBI, CIA, NSA, etc.) and
lobbying group personnel from serving in public office
iii. Bans on transgenders and transsexuals from serving in public office
iv. Discarding the ‘winner-take-all’ election system for Congressional races,
favoring one where the voter chooses what political party they would favor, and
the proportion of votes per available seats determines how many legislative seats
each party can fill, thus eliminating the restrictive two-party system
b. Rebuild environmental health by:
i. Drafting of a ‘Five Year Plan’ to research and develop cheap and renewable
sources of energy, that can be implemented anywhere, to replace oil and coal
twenty years after successfully completing the plan, so as to ensure the slowing
and acceptance of global climate change
ii. Reinstate the Civilian Conservation Corp for new or struggling Americans to
help rebuild the nation’s infrastructure and promote environmental cleanliness,
while they receive discipline apart from military service and earn a livable wage
c. Make abortion illegal to perform except in three cases, so as to force a consequence once
chosen, and encourage a socially positive view of pregnancy and life:
i. A pregnancy conceived in rape can be legally aborted up to four months
ii. A pregnancy conceived in incest can be legally aborted up to four months
iii. Any pregnancy that has developed no later than six weeks can be legally
aborted
d. Transform the internet into a public utility to ensure that online freedom of speech is
ensured and that healthy competition is maintained
e. Enact stricter Voter ID laws to ensure against fraudulent domestic practices and
tampering from foreign interests
f. Reform the education system from an unclear, indoctrinating baby-sitting service to
forward-enabling encouragement and instruction, particularly emphasizing: improved
physical fitness, historical comprehension, mathematical understanding, computer
competency, and financial responsibility
8. Western Civilization no longer exists to pioneer into the unknown and return with new
knowledge to apply – it only exists as a decaying, archaic environment that corporations use as a
backdrop while they work for their interests. We no longer advance; we have stagnated by shifting
focus from the group at large to smaller sub-groups and minority or special interests. The
barbarians are past the gate now, the degenerates are out of the shadows; they mingle together
untoward at the temple, toppling the liturgy and erecting their own atop our tattered rituals. But
the government can still be manhandled from corporate lobbies, and the invisible battle between
and among corporate interests can be ended by an intervention of the people. For so long, there
has been unmitigated disease-sharing between the media, the military-industrial-complex, and
international elites. For far too long, our people have stood by watching them pillage our home.
No one should anticipate massive shifts in voter demographics and expect things to remain
the same. We witnessed this when the Baby Boomer generation came of-age in the new post-war
environment, a generation after the 19th Amendment, with Civil Rights and the 21st Amendment
emerging. The divorce rate, the immigration rate, inflation rate, consolidation of the media,
housing prices, and aggregate unhealthiness all began a steep national climb in the late-60’s, and
were skyrocketing by the 80’s. Similarly, the history of post-colonial Zimbabwe, Ivory Coast, and
 56

the current course of South Africa with these trends exhibit what happens when there is a non-
white majority in a nation with white institutions. Seismic shifts in demography and ideology lead
to real change, never for the benefit of the majority, no matter how well they had treated the
minority.
__________
 57

Enchiridion Coda

The thesis is very simple:

1. There is a natural order, an organic balance, an optimal functioning that every system
regresses to for a conservation of energy. Whether that system is the Universe itself, a planet, a
nation, a family, or an individual life, immoderation leads to overly entropic operations, imbalance,
and threatens the stability of other adjacent systems. This process applies to and works on the
individual or collective level.
2. Humanity’s genetic programming that encodes biological properties (both cognitive and
corporeal) varies significantly between the sexes, and from continent to continent and culturally
within continents, but an overall encompassing nature is applicable to all. The different
opportunities available to different populations encourages long-term adaptations to those
environments, forming racial and ethnic divisions.
3. The European, white race has their own, distinct traditional values, which are innately
sought by whites and fuel their social balance, allowing for a competitive, inquiring spirit that
facilitates technology and industry. Through a constant course-correction, Western Civilization
was able to remain sustainable until its traditional values were undermined by those seeking to
wield prosperity against the people.
4. That through the communication of identity, purpose, and drive through electronic media
entertainment and news, the West has allowed itself to conveniently sink into decadence and
weakness, making it susceptible to forces opposed to its traditional values. This waning process is
overseen and deliberately coordinated by an elite, international group that is predominantly Jewish.
5. Adaptation to the environment of the modern world is antithetical to a realized human
existence because is encourages immoderated self-indulgence at the expense of forfeiting one’s
individual potency. This has led to behavior that degenerates society’s ability to properly function
and attracts groups that hope to use the West as a vessel for their own interests.
6. To understand the natural order in this environment is impossible because it sets an
enclosing around concepts of the Universe and humanity that benefit itself rather than endorse
honesty.
7. By temporarily going out into the natural world, away from all human bustle, one can
begin to realize the Universal order of things and return into the modern world with understanding,
drive, and experience of phenomenon outside of its articulations.
8. To destroy the waning modern world and rebuild something organically balanced, those
who understand the natural order must amalgamate against the pawns of the opposing international
elite. For the West, this process means that European whites must organize as a racial entity
opposed to individuals who degenerate the social sphere, which generally takes the form of other
races.
9. Reformation and revolution aligned to bring the pendulum to an even point so that energy
is conserved, means that violence will inevitably ensue whether or not whites desire so. In the
aftermath of violence, a military order must establish itself to create a new society that seeks
personal and social well-being through allowing behavioral consequences.
So, in the end, this text holds that belief should be placed in:
Human nature, not humanity
Orderly change, not chance or fate
Self-control and balanced virtue, not altruism or relativism
 58

Skepticism and truth, not dogmatism or nihilism

Defensive violence, not aggression or pacifism
Biological identity, not brand selection
And lastly, this text concludes with a final thought: that despite existing within the
cadaverous atrophy, you are not a victim. No longer can you claim such a tattered title, because
knowledge ushers power through the palace. But everything you’ve read is not the solution, it is
not the end, because power can only be seated upon the throne if it asserts itself outside the mind.
For the authority of ferocity does not care whether one is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ or moderate, but only
if one has the ability and will to dominate. Aligning with moderation grants one more flexibility,
but without solid action in the realm of space and time, one will achieve nothing. For many years,
Americans have relied on the ‘rights’ acknowledged in the Constitution. If not reaffirmed off the
page, they will be dissolved.

__________

Sources, Inspirations, and Informative References

‘The Bhagavad Gita’ ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’, George Miller

‘The Darkside of the Moon’, Pink Floyd ‘Moby Dick’, Hermann Melville

‘The Clouds’, Aristophanes ‘Money Store’, Death Grips

‘Democracy in America’, Alexis d’ Tocqueville ‘Pilgrimage’, Om

‘Discourses’, Epictetus ‘The Prince’, Machiavelli

‘Eyes Wide Shut’, Stanley Kubrick ‘Revolt Against the Modern World’, Julius Evola

‘The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick’, Philip K. Dick ‘Smile’, Brian Wilson

‘Fleet Foxes’, Fleet Foxes The ‘Star Wars’ prequel trilogy

‘The Fountain’, Darren Aronofsky ‘Tao Te Ching’, Lao Tzu

‘God Emperor of Dune’, Frank Herbert ‘Technological Slavery’, Ted Kaczysnski

‘Have One on Me’, Joanna Newsom ‘The Gospel According to Mark’

‘The Hobbit’, J.R.R. Tolkein ‘There Will Be Blood’, Paul Thomas Anderson

‘The Holy Mountain’, Alejandro Jodorowsky ‘White Identity’, Jared Taylor

‘In the Court of the Crimson King’, King Crimson ‘Why Race Matters’, Michael Levin

‘Lives of the Famous Greeks and Romans’, Plutarch ‘Yessongs’, Yes

‘Lonerism’, Tame Impala /pol/

‘The Lord of the Rings’ film trilogy /v/pizzagate

59