Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
HUMAN-INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
(ISYE6059)
Prior to and during the practicum sessions, student needs to understand the
following rules:
1. Rules and Regulation
a. Plagiarism, Cheating, Collusion and Abuse of Resource Materials Definition:
Plagiarism means the appropriation of another’s work and inadequately
or inappropriately acknowledged incorporation of that work in one’s own
written, oral, visual, or original performativity work that is offered for credit.
Plagiarism definition according to article 1 Regulation of Indonesian
National Education Ministry No 17 of 2010:
“Plagiarism is an intentional or unintentional act to obtain or trying to obtain
creditor score for a scientific work, by citing some or all other scientific work
that acknowledged as his/her scientific work, without declaring the source
properly and adequately.” The Important aspects:
1. Intentionally or unintentionally done,
2. Citing some or all of the scientific work, and
3. Without mentioning the source properly and adequately.
3. Practicum Worksheet
a. Task and Quiz
a) Hardcopy of the weekly report shall be submitted in the beginning of each
session. The status of “No report submission” is applied, for report submitted
five minutes after the deadline.
b) Quiz sheets must be in A4 80 gram. Answer only in the quiz answer sheet.
Failure to follow any instruction will result in ZERO SCORE.
c) The numbering mechanism for figure and table has to comply with the chapter
number. Any form that belongs to “table” category has to be located in the
top center alignment with Times New Roman font size 10 point and the
source below the table with Times New Roman font size 10 point; while, the
“figure” category has to be located in the bottom center alignment with Times
New Roman font size 10 point and the source below the figure with Times
New Roman font size 10 point.
E.g.: The numbering mechanism for figure and table in the first chapter are
respectively written as: Figure 1.1, Figure1.2, and onward in the first chapter;
and Table 1.1, Table 1.2, and onward in the first chapter.
d) Header & Footer font format are both written in Times New Roman 8 point,
with single space.
Header : Practicum Term Project
Human-Integrated Systems (ISYE6059)
Footer : Industrial Engineering Laboratory
Industrial Engineering Department
BINUS University
e) The term report should be written in systematical, clear and concise manner.
4. Grade Distribution
Tan Hauw Sen Rimo, S.T., M.T. Taufik, S.T., M.M., Ph.D
Head of Industrial Head of Industrial Engineering
Engineering Laboratory Department
Performance Indicator SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SO6 SO7 SO8 SO9 SO10 SO11
Human-Integrated Systems x xx x x xx xx xx
Identify human factor
problems at workplace
environment. ✓ ✓ ✓
Identify solutions based on
human factor principles
(basic cognitive ergonomics
concepts and formulas, and
physiological concepts to
analyze and solve human ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
factor problems).
Produce recommendation
within the constraints. ✓ ✓ ✓
Prepare human factor
analysis report. ✓ ✓ ✓
Perform human factor
analysis report. ✓
Perform effectively in a
group with other engineers. ✓ ✓
Module Description
1 Anthropometry
6 Energy Consumption
7 Occupational Stress
8 Occupational Fatigue
Module
Learning Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Identify human factor
Problems at workplace ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
environment.
Identify solutions based on
human factor principles (basic
cognitive ergonomics concepts
and formulas, and physiological ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
concepts to analyze and solve
human
Factor problems).
Produce recommendation ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
within the constraints.
Prepare human factor analysis
✓ ✓
report.
Perform human factor analysis
✓ ✓
report.
Perform effectively in a group
✓ ✓
with other engineers.
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
WS 1 WS 2 WS 3 WS 4 WS 5 WS 6 WS 7 WS 8
Assessment
Final Project
Description:
Q = Quiz
WS = Weekly Worksheet
CONTENT
THE GENERAL RULES ON H.I.S. PRACTICUM ................................................... ii
STUDENT OUTCOMES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES MAPPING BASED ON
MODULE ..................................................................................................................... v
CONTENT ................................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................................ ix
LIST OF PICTURE...................................................................................................... x
MODULE 1 ANTHROPOMETRY ............................................................................ 1
I. Objectives ........................................................................................ 1
II. Literature Review ............................................................................ 1
III. Tables and Pictures .......................................................................... 2
IV. Formulas ........................................................................................ 11
V. Reference ....................................................................................... 11
MODULE 2 PRINCIPLES OF ROOM DESIGN ..................................................... 12
I. Objectives ...................................................................................... 12
II. Literature Review .......................................................................... 12
III. Pictures........................................................................................... 13
IV. References...................................................................................... 14
MODULE 3 TIME AND MOTION STUDY ............................................................ 15
I. Objectives ...................................................................................... 15
II. Literature Review .......................................................................... 15
III. Tables ............................................................................................. 17
IV. Formulas ........................................................................................ 21
V. References...................................................................................... 21
MODULE 4 BIOMECHANICS AND DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING ........ 22
I. Objectives ...................................................................................... 22
II. Literature Review .......................................................................... 22
III. Tables ............................................................................................. 25
IV. Formulas ........................................................................................ 26
V. References...................................................................................... 28
MODULE 5 SAFETY & HEALTH IN WORKPLACE ........................................... 29
I. Objectives ...................................................................................... 29
II. Literature Review .......................................................................... 29
III. Tables and Pictures ........................................................................ 33
IV. Formulas ........................................................................................ 36
V. References...................................................................................... 36
LIST OF TABLE
Pages
Table 1.1 Guideline for the Measurement of Body Position ....................................... 2
Table 1.2 Guideline for The Measurement of Hand Position ...................................... 7
Table 1.3 Anthropometry Data .................................................................................... 8
Table 1.4 Hand Anthropometry Data ........................................................................... 9
Table 1.5 Formulas for Percentile .............................................................................. 11
Table 3.1 Performance Rating with Westinghouse System ....................................... 17
Table 3.2 Work Performance Rating ......................................................................... 17
Table 3.3 Work Allowance ........................................................................................ 18
Table 3.4 Gilbreth Therbligs ...................................................................................... 19
Table 3.5 Two-Hand Process Chart with MTM Method ........................................... 20
Table 3.6 Confidence Level Constants ...................................................................... 21
Table 4.1 Comparison of Manual Handling Method ................................................. 24
Table 4.2 Hand-to-container Coupling Classification ............................................... 25
Table 4.3 Frequency Multiplier.................................................................................. 25
Table 4.4 Coupling Multiplier.................................................................................... 26
Table 5.1 Effects of Reducing the Core Body Temperature ...................................... 30
Table 5.2 Job Hazard Analysis................................................................................... 31
Table 5.3 Recommended Illuminations Levels for Use in Interior Lighting Design. 33
Table 5.4 Common Light Levels Outdoor at Day and Night ..................................... 34
Table 5.5 Permissible Noise Exposure....................................................................... 34
Table 5.6 Noise Dose for The Use of Office Space ................................................... 34
Table 6.1 Correlation Between Metabolism, Respiration, Body Temperature and
Heart Rate as.............................................................................................. 39
Table 6.2 Observation Heart Rate Before and After Work Using Ergo-bike ............ 40
Table 6.3 Observation Heart Rate Before and After Work Using Footstep .............. 40
Table 6.4 Energy Consumption Using Ergo-bike ...................................................... 41
Table 6.5 Energy Consumption Using Footstep ........................................................ 41
Table 6.6 Equation Correlation for Ergo-bike ........................................................... 41
Table 6.7 Equation Correlation for Footstep.............................................................. 41
Table 7.1 Cocorometer’s Stress Level ....................................................................... 44
Table 7.2 Amylase Assay Result ............................................................................... 45
Table 8.1 Function of Brain Lobes ............................................................................ 50
Table 8.2 Common Frequency Bandwidths ............................................................... 50
Table 8.3 Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI) ...................................... 52
Table 8.4 The NASA Task Load Index Questionnaire .............................................. 54
Table 8.5 Weighted Rating Worksheet ...................................................................... 55
LIST OF PICTURE
Pages
Figure 1.1 Illustration of Measured Body Dimensions ................................................ 6
Figure 1.2 Illustration of Measured Hand Dimensions ................................................ 7
Figure 1.3 Optimum Sitting Position for Computer Work ........................................ 10
Figure 1.4 A Well Designed Office Chair for Computer ........................................... 10
Figure 2.1 Space Envelope for Control Locations in Construction and Industrial
Equipment ............................................................................................... 14
Figure 4.1 Free-body Diagram of The Lifting Load Activity .................................... 27
Figure 5.1 Fault Tree Symbols ................................................................................... 31
Figure 5.2 Examples of Stretching Activity ............................................................... 35
Figure 6.1 Factors Affecting Individuals Work Ability ............................................. 38
Figure 6.2 Target Heart Rates for Different Ages and Various Levels of Activity ... 40
Figure 7.1 The First Step in Stimulus Secretion Coupling is Release of a
Neurotransmitter...................................................................................... 44
Figure 7.2 Cocorometer ............................................................................................. 44
Figure 7.3 Well-Being Questionnaire ........................................................................ 45
Figure 8.1 Conventional EEG and Emotiv EPOC ..................................................... 48
Figure 8.2 Emotiv EPOC Electrodes Placements ...................................................... 49
Figure 8.3 Brain Lobes ............................................................................................... 49
Figure 8.4 Short Explanation of Wave ....................................................................... 50
Figure 8.5 Fatigue Assesment Scale (FAS) ............................................................... 53
Figure 8.6 The NASA Task Load Index .................................................................... 55
MODULE 1
ANTHROPOMETRY
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To understand the definition of anthropometry and be able to measure the
anthropometry data.
2. To understand the limitations and advantages of the human anthropometry in
designing an optimum work system.
3. To apply the principle of human-integrated systems in designing an optimum
work system.
4. To analyze and evaluate work system to improve work system in the future.
IV. Formulas
1. Mean:
∑𝑋𝑖
𝑋=
𝑁
2. Standard Deviation:
∑(𝑋𝑖 − 𝑋)2
𝑆= √
𝑁−1
3. Formula for percentile:
V. Reference
1. Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work
Design (12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
2. Kroemer, K. H. (2017). Fitting the Human: Introduction to Ergonomics (7th
ed.). Florida: CRC Press.
3. Ng, P. K., Saptari, A., & Fauzi, A. M. (2013). Hand Anthropometry: A
Descriptive Analysis on Elderly Malaysians. Malaysia: Research Gate.
4. Salvendy, G. (2012). Handbook of human Factors and Ergonomics. New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Scott, P., Kogi, K., & McPhee, B. (2010). Ergonomic Guidelines for
Occupational Health Practice in Industrially Developing Countries.
Germany: University of Darmstadt.
MODULE 2
PRINCIPLES OF ROOM DESIGN
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To understand and design the layout in workplace.
2. To understand and design the section at office.
3. Able to analyze layout using Personal Space and Horizontal Work Surface
Area
4. Able to evaluate the layout in workplace
The colours which have longer wavelength such as red, orange, and yellow
are viewed as arousing, while colours which have shorter wavelength such as
green, blue, and violet are viewed as calming (Samara, 2014).
The observed colours of visible spectrum and corresponding wavelengths
(in nanometers) (Turgeon, 2015):
1. Violet 380 – 440
2. Blue 440 – 500
3. Green 500 – 580
4. Yellow 580 – 600
5. Orange 600 – 620
6. Red 620 – 750
3. No touch zone (min. 45,7 cm), ex: passengers in a lightly loaded lift car.
4. Touch zone (min. 30,5 cm), ex: a crowded lift car.
III. Pictures
To minimize these problems, appropriate design of the workplace is
required. More specifically, the working surface should be at a height that
permits a person to work with the shoulders at the relaxed posture. It should be
noticed here that the working height does not always equate to the work surface
height. The former depends on what one is working on (e.g., the keyboard of a
computer), while the later is the height of the upper surface of the table, desk,
bench, and so on. Furthermore, to define the appropriate work surface height,
one should consider the angles between the upper arms and the elbows and the
angle between the elbows and the wrists (Salvendy, 2012).
It is necessary to limit the extent of forward and sideways reaches to avoid
having to bend over or twist the trunk. Work pieces, tools and controls that are
in regular use should be located directly in front of or near the body. The most
important operations should take place within a radius of approximately 50 cm.
This value applies do both seated and standing work (Salvendy, 2012).
IV. References
1. Barney, G., & Al-Sharif, L. (2015). Elevator Traffic Handbook: Theory and
Practice. New York: Routledge.
2. Salvendy, G. (2012). Handbook of human Factors and Ergonomics. New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3. Samara, T. (2014). Design Elements A Graphic Style Manual (2nd ed.).
Beverly: Rockport Publishers.
4. Scott, P., Kogi, K., & McPhee, B. (2010). Ergonomic Guidelines For
Occupational Health Practice In Industrially Developing Countries.
Germany: University of Darmstadt.
5. Turgeon, M. L. (2015). Linne & Ringsrud's Clinical Laboratory Science: The
Basics and Routine Techniques. Boston: Elsevier Health Science.
MODULE 3
TIME AND MOTION STUDY
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To give an understanding of time and motion study concepts
2. Able to collect time and motion data directly and indrectly
3. Able to define Therbligh movement and classfy the motion into effective and
ineffective movement
4. Able to eliminate or reduce ineffective movement base on given study case
5. Able to define time cycle, normal time and standard time by applying
Westtinghouse and ILO allowance method
6. Able to analyze current workstation layout and propose the optimal one
III. Tables
Total Total
Cycle Time
Number of Product/cycle
Assembly Time (one product)
Source: (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009)
IV. Formulas
The formula is as following (Shim, 2009):
assembly time
Cycle Time=
number of assembly
100% + % rating
Normal time = cycle time x ( )
100%
100%
Standard time = normal time x ( )
100% - %allowance
Cycle Time = total time required for a worker to complete one cycle of an
operation
Normal Time = the normal time for a particular employee is rated against the
average job element time
Standard time = the time needed to complete an operation by an employee
working at 100% efficiency with unavoidable delays
( )
< N, maka data cukup
N’ = number of observations needed
k = confidence level
s = degree of accuracy
N = number of observations have been done
Xj = observations data
V. References
1. Carson, B., & Nicol, N. (2014). Discrete-Event System Simulation. United
Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
2. Fisk, A. D., Czaja, J. S., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., & Sharit, J. (2009).
Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors
Approaches (2nd ed.). Florida: CRC Press.
3. Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work
Design (12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
4. Shim, J. D. (2009). The Pockets MBA. Los Alamitos: Delta Publishing
Company.
MODULE 4
BIOMECHANICS AND DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To understand the importance of manual handling issues in a workplace.
2. To understand various causes of injury in a workplace and how to prevent it.
3. To be able to differentiate the right lifting method and the wrong lifting
method which can cause injury.
4. To be able to calculate NIOSH Lifting Equation.
5. To be able to calculate the effect of compressive force and shear force in the
process of lifting of the load.
6. To analyze NIOSH lifting equation, compressive force and shear force.
In order to avoid the injuries and stress in a work place, company must
have the proper safety rules and regulations. The safety rules can be summarized
as follow:
1. Employers must set rules that ensure a safe and healthy workplace.
2. Employers must ensure that all employees are knowledgeable about the rules.
3. Employers must ensure that safety rules are enforced objectively and
consistently.
III. Tables
IV. Formulas
The formula is as following:
RWL = LC x HM x VM x DM x AM x FM x CM
HM = 10/H (for inch)
HM = 25/H (for cm)
VM = 1 – (0.0075 |V-30|) (for inch)
VM = 1 – (0.003 |V-75|) (for cm)
DM = 0.82 + (1.8/D) (for inch)
DM = 0.82 + (4.5/D) (for cm)
AM = 1 – (0.0032 x A)
D = | Vawal – Vakhir |
𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
𝐿𝐼 =
𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡
Where:
1. RWL = Recommended Weight Limit. Represents the weight that can be lifted
by almost all healthy workers for approximately eight hours without
increasing the risk of injury.
2. LC = Load Constant. This load constant’s value is 51 lbs (23 kg). This value
represents the maximum load that is recommended for standard lifting.
3. HM = Horizontal Multiplier. Horizontal multiplier determined by horizontal
distances from the center of ankle and the point of the center of hand to floor.
4. VM = Vertical Multiplier. Vertical multiplier determined by vertical
distances from the floor to the center of the handgrip.
5. DM = Distance Multiplier. Distance multiplier’s factor is determined by the
vertical movement of both hands, from the starting point to the destination of
the lifting.
6. AM = Asymmetric Multiplier. Asymmetric multiplier measures if the body
must twist or turn during the lifting. This measurement is done in degrees
(with 360o being one complete circle).
7. FM = Frequency Multiplier. Frequency multiplier’s factor is determined
based on the amount of lifting per minute, the duration of the lifting, and the
lifting’s vertical distance.
8. CM = Coupling Multiplier. The NIOSH equation divides the coupling based
on the quality of the handle and the vertical position of the load. The good
coupling means the container’s handle is very easy to grip. The fair coupling
means the container’s handle is easy to grip. Lastly the poor coupling means
the container is pretty big, hard to handle, or has sharp corners.
9. If LI > 1, then the work (lifting) can be categorized as dangerous.
Where:
Mexternal = Mupperbody + Mload
= (-Fupperbody × Lbody ) + (-Fload × Lload )
= [-(68,8% × mbody × g ) ( Lbody )] + [-( mload × g)( Lload )]
Minternal = Fmuscle × d
If Fcompression > 3400 N and Fshear > 500 N then the work can be categorized
as dangerous.
V. References
1. Badiru, A. B., & Racz, L. (2015). Handbook of Measurements: Benchmarks
for Systems Accuracy and Precision. London: CRC Press.
2. Berlin, C., & Adams, C. (2017). Production Ergonomics: Designing Work
Systems to Support Optimal Human Performance. London: Ubiquity press.
3. Chaffin, D., Anderson, G. B., & Martin, B. J. (2006). Occupational
Biomechanics. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
4. Freivalds, A. (2011). Biomechanics of the Upper Limbs: Mechanics,
Modeling and Musculoskeletal Injuries. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
5. Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work
Design (12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
6. Goetsch, D. L. (2015). Occupational Safety and Health for Technologist,
Engineers, and Managers (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
7. Houglum, P. A., & Bertoti, D. B. (2012). Brunnstrom's Clinical
Kinesiology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
8. Iridiastadi, H., & Yassierli. (2014). Ergonomi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung:
PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
MODULE 5
SAFETY & HEALTH IN WORKPLACE
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To understand the importance of safety and health issues in a workplace.
2. To understand various causes of injury in a workplace and how to prevent it.
3. To understand the effect of illumination, temperature, ventilation, vibration
and noise dose level on worker’s productivity.
4. To analyze and evaluate a proper environment in a workplace based on the
illumination, temperature, ventilation, vibration and noise dose limit.
5. To analyze error in workplace using fault tree analysis.
6. To prevent accident using hazard control.
wider range of temperatures without serious loss of efficiency, and can act as a
buffer to protect core temperatures. Clothing, if worn, acts as a second shell to
insulate the core temperature further (Bridger, 2009).
Besides hot climates, cold climates can also be unsafe, which can be fatal.
The goal of safety and health professionals in protecting employees from acute
cold stress is to prevent the deep body temperature from falling below 360C and
to prevent cold injuries to body extremities, especially the hands, feet, and head.
A fatal exposure to cold typically results from failure to remove the employee
from a cold air environment or immersion in cold water. Here is the body's
response to reducing its core temperature (Goetsch, 2015):
If the room has people, machinery, or activities in it, the air in the room
will deteriorate due to the release of odors, the release of heat, the formation of
water vapor, the production of carbon dioxide, and the production of toxic
vapors. Ventilation must be provided to dilute these contaminants, exhaust the
stale air, and supply fresh air. This can be done in one or more of three
approaches: general, local, or spot. General or displacement ventilation is
delivered at the 2.4 – 3.6 m level and displaces the warm air rising from the
equipment, lights and workers (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009).
Vibration can cause detrimental effects on human performance. Vibrations
of high amplitude and low frequency have especially undesirable effects on body
organs and tissue. The parameters of vibration are frequency, amplitude,
velocity, acceleration, and jerk. Every mechanical system can be modeled using
a mass, spring, and dashpot which, in combination, result in the system having
its own natural frequency. The nearer the vibration comes to this frequency, the
greater the effect on that system. The human tolerance for vibration decreases as
the exposure time increases. Thus, tolerable acceleration level increases with
decreasing exposure time (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009).
Job safety analysis (JSA) is a procedure for identifying the hazards
associated with each step of a job for the purpose of improving the safety of
overall job. Job safety analysis is one of many tools that are emerged to reduce
the cause of injury.
In a JSA, the safety engineer does few important things, such as (Freivalds
& Niebel, 2009):
1. Breaks down a job into its component elements in a sequential order.
2. Examines each element critically for a potential hazard or the possibility of
an accident occurrence.
3. Identifies ways of improving the safety of this element.
According to Freivalds & Niebel (2009), here are four major factors that
he or she should focus on:
1. Worker: the operator, the supervisor, or any other individual that may be
associated with this element.
2. Method: the work procedures being utilized in this particular process.
3. Machine: the equipment and tools being utilized.
4. Material: the raw material, parts, components, fasteners, etc., that are being
used or assembled in the process.
The development of a fault tree starts with identifying all the events that
are deemed undesirable for normal operation. These events need to be separated
into mutually exclusive groups according to similar causes with one head event
for each group. For example, in a grinding operation there could be several
mutually exclusive fault events leading to different head events or accidents:
finger scraped by grinder. Next, the relationship between the various causal
events and head event are established through the combination of the AND and
OR gates. This is continued until basic fault events are reached, which cannot be
developed any further. In the final step, appropriate controls are attempted along
with estimated reductions in probabilities, leading to a decrease in the probability
of the final head event (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009).
According to Freivalds & Niebel (2009), hazard is a condition with the
potential of causing injury or damage while danger is the relative potential
consequences of that hazard. Thus, an unprotected worker on scaffold is exposed
to a hazard and has the danger of serious injury. Hazards can occur in several
general categories:
1. Due to inherent properties such as high voltage, radiation, or caustic
chemicals.
2. Due to potential failure, either of the operator (or some other person) or of the
machine (or some other equipment).
3. Due to environmental forecast or stresses, for example wind, and corrosion,
etc.
The general approach is to first completely eliminate the hazard and
prevent the accident, and then if not successful, to reduce the hazard level to the
point that, should the accidents still happen, the potential injury or damage is
minimized. Elimination of a hazard can be achieved through good design and
proper procedure, for example use of non-combustible materials and solvents,
rounding edges or equipment, automating corrosive dips (that is, removing the
operator from the hazardous environment, building an overpass at railroad, and
highway intersections, etc.) (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009).
Table 5.3 Recommended Illuminations Levels for Use in Interior Lighting Design
Range of
Category illuminance Type of activity Reference area
(ftcd)
Public areas with dark
A 2-3-5
surroundings.
Simple orientation for short General lighting
B 5-7.5-10
temporary visits. throughout room
Working spaces where visual or area.
C 10-15-20 tasks are performed only
occasionally.
Performance of visual tasks of
high contrast or large size, e.g.,
reading printed material, typed
D 20-30-50 originals, handwriting in ink and
xerography; rough bench and
machine work; ordinary
inspection; rough assembly
Performance of visual tasks of
medium contrast or small size,
e.g., reading medium pencil
handwriting, poorly printed or Illuminance on
E 50-75-100
reproduced material; medium task.
bench and machine work;
difficult inspection; medium
assembly.
Performance of visual tasks of
low contrast or very small size,
e.g., reading handwriting in hard
F 100-150-200 pencil on poor-quality paper and
very poorly reproduced material;
highly difficult inspection,
difficult assembly.
Performance of visual tasks of
low contrast and very small size
over a prolonged period, e.g.,
G 200-300-500 fine assembly; very difficult
inspection; fine bench and
machine work; extra fine Illuminance on
assembly. task via a
Performance of very prolonged combination of
and exacting visual tasks, e.g., general and
H 500-750-1,000 the most difficult inspection; supplementary
extra fine bench and machine local lighting.
work; extra fine assembly.
Performance of very special
1,000-1,500- visual tasks of extremely low
I
2,000 contrast and small size, e.g.,
surgical procedures.
Source: (Freivalds & Niebel, 2009)
Noise dose that appropriate for the use of office space (Menteri Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia, 2016):
filing, meeting, assisted by doing short breaks, and stretching. Short breaks used
with 20-20-20 method, which is (Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2016):
1. Every 20 minutes work using computer.
2. Intercalated with short 20 seconds short break.
3. By not looking at computer as far as 20 ft.
And every two hours of working ought to intercalate stretching activity for
10-15 minutes. Here are the examples of stretching activity on the picture below
(Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2016):
IV. Formulas
According to Freivalds & Niebel (2009), here are the formulas:
8
𝑇𝑛 = (𝐿−90)/5
2
Where:
Tn = Maximum duration time at a specified noise level (hour)
L = Sound levels (dB)
𝐶1 𝐶2 𝐶
D = 100 × (𝑇1 + 𝑇2 + ⋯ + 𝑇𝑛 )
𝑛
Where:
D = Noise Dose level (%)
C = Exposure time at a specified noise level (hour)
T = Maximum duration time at a specified noise level (hour)
n = 1, 2, 3, ….
Where:
TWA = Time Weight Average
V. References
1. Blanchard, B. S., & Fabricky, W. J. (2014). Systems Engineering and
Analysis (5th ed.). USA: Pearson Education.
2. Bridger, R. S. (2009). Introduction to Ergonomics (3rd ed.). Boca Roton:
CRC Press.
3. Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work
Design (12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
4. Goetsch, D. L. (2015). Occupational Safety and Health for Technologist,
Engineers, and Managers (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
5. Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar
Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Perkantoran. Indonesia: Direktur
Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undangan Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi
Manusia Republik Indonesia.
6. NOAO. (2015, December 2). Recommended Light Levels. Retrieved from
The National Optical Astronomy Observatory:
https://www.noao.edu/education/QLTkit/ACTIVITY_Documents/Safety/Li
ghtLevels_outdoor+indoor.pdf
MODULE 6
ENERGY CONSUMPTION
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To provide work load determinant knowledge based upon physiological
criteria.
2. To provide understanding of workload influence on human body during
activities.
3. To provide adequate knowledge and understanding in order to design work
system through biomechanics work aspect and measurement.
4. To be able to determine specific workload magnitude using three variables:
heart rate, energy expenditure and rest time.
5. To analyze energy consumption of heart rate and rest time that can come out
due to specific workload.
Table 6.1 Correlation Between Metabolism, Respiration, Body Temperature and Heart Rate as
Media of Workload Measurement
Cycle Oxygen
Heart Rates
Classification Ergometer Uptake METs Occupation
(Beats/min)
(W) L/min
Heavy
manual
Very heavy forestry, heavy
>125 >1.75 >6.7 >150
Labour manual
transport
labour, fire
fighting
Heavy with
Heavy labour 100-125 1.5-1.75 5.7-6.7 130-150 breathing
construction
apparatus
work,
agricultural
Heavy
labour
healthcare
Moderately
50-100 1.0-1.5 3.8-5.7 100-130 work,
heavy labour
construction
work, service,
and cleaning
Household
workwork,
(hotel and
Light labour 40-50 0.75-1.0 2.8-3.8 80-130 restaurant)
light factory
work, light
healthcare
work, retail
Office work,
Very light 20-40 0.5-.75 1.9-2.8 70-80 work,
car
Labour <20 <0.5 <1.9 <70 laboratory
driving, seated
Source: (Toomingas et al., 2016) Works
work
(reading,
writing)
III. Tables
Table 6.2 Observation Heart Rate Before and After Work Using Ergo-bike
Speed DNo (heart DNi (heart CNi
No Name
(Km/hour) rate/minute) rate/minute) (Kcal)
20
1 30
40
20
2 30
40
Table 6.3 Observation Heart Rate Before and After Work Using Footstep
Reps / DNo (heart DNi (heart CNi
No Name
minute rate/minute) rate/minute) (Kcal)
20
1 30
40
20
2 30
40
IV. Formulas
According to Freivalds & Niebel (2009), here are the formulas:
1. Energy consumption:
DNi - DNo
E = 1.33 +
10
Where:
1.33 = Basal Metabolism
E = Energy consumption (kcal/minute)
DNi = Heart rate after work (rate per minute)
DNo = Heart rate before work (rate per minute)
Where:
R = Break time needed (percentage)
W = Average of energy consumption for working (Kcal/minute) (CNi)
Correlation equation:
n ∑ni=1 Xi Yi - (∑ni=1 Xi ) (∑ni=2 Yi )
r=
√[n ∑ni=1 X2i - (∑ni=1 Xi )2 ][n ∑ni=1 Y2i - (∑ni=1 Yi )2 ]
Where:
r = Correlation
n = Number of item
x = Independent Variable (Speed)
y = Dependent Variable (CNi)
V. References
1. Boyle, M. A. (2015). Personal Nutrition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
2. Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work
Design (12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
3. Guangchang, P., Junbo, X., Qingsen, C., & Zhihe, H. (2014). Energy Intake,
Metabolic Homepstatis, and Human Health. Food Science and Human
Wellness, 89-103.
4. Hales, D. (2007). An Invitation to Wellness: Making Healthy Choices.
Belmont: Cengage Learning.
5. Iridiastadi, H., & Yassierli. (2014). Ergonomi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT
Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
6. Kroemer, K. H. (2017). Fitting the Human: Introduction to Ergonomics (7th
ed.). Florida: CRC Press.
7. Silverthorn, D. U. (2016). Human Physiology. United Kingdom: Pearson
Education Limited.
8. Toomingas, A., Mathiassen, S. E., & Tornqvist, E. W. (2016). Occupational
Physiology. Florida: CRC Press.
MODULE 7
OCCUPATIONAL STRESS
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To understand the concept of mental stress.
2. To be able to use the Cocorometer to measure stress.
3. To be able to use Well-Being questionnaire to measure stress.
4. Able to analyze the result from Cocorometer and Well-Being to propose
improvement at the work system
IV. References
1. Batista, P., Pereira, A., & Vaz, A. B. (2017). Salivary Biomarkers in
Psychological Stress Diagnosis. ARC Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9-
18.
2. Hoeger, W. W., Hoeger, S. A., Hoeger, I. C., & Fawson, A. L. (2017).
Lifetime Physical Fitness & Wellness A Personalized Program. Boston:
Cengage Learning.
3. Impress Watch Corporation. (2007). Retrieved from k-tai@impress.co.jp:
http://k-tai.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/article/todays_goods/37618.html
4. Melin, B. (2016). Work with High Levels of Mental Strees. In A. Toomingas,
S. E. Mathiassen, & E. E. Tornqvist, Occupational Physiology (183-203).
Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
5. Michael, E., Colin, D., Denis, O., & Whelton, H. (2012). Introduction: The
Anatomy and Physiology of Salivary Glands. London: Stephan Hancocks
Limited.
6. Nipro's Stress Test: DigInfo. (2007, june 24). Retrieved from DigInfoTv:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5GcQQD31ys
7. Perrewe, P. L., & Ganster, D. C. (2011). The Role of Individual Differences
in Occupational Stress and Well Being. Wagon Lane, Bingley: Emerald
Group.
MODULE 8
OCCUPATIONAL FATIGUE
I. Objectives
The objectives of this practicum are:
1. To describe the functions of Electroencephalogram (EEG) in terms of fatigue.
2. To be able to use Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory to measure fatigue.
3. To be able to use Fatigue Assessment Scale to measure fatigue.
4. Able to analyze the result from SOFI and FAS to propose improvement at the
work system
The letters on Figure 8.2 stand for the parts of the brain that are being
observed. The letters F, T, C, P and O stand for frontal, temporal, central,
parietal, and occipital lobes, respectively. C stands for central, but it is used as
identification only.
The EEG can also show the frequency of brain waves. The difference in
frequency results in the difference of state of mind.
III. Nasa-TLX
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index
(NASA-TLX), which is a subjective method of measuring workload based on
the average loading of 6 dimensional scales, namely Mental Demand, Temporal
Demand, Physical Demand, Effort, Performance, and Frustation (Azemil &
Wahyuni, 2017).
The weighting stage of NASA Task Load Index method are as follow
(Stanton, Salmon, Baber, & Jenkins, 2018):
1. In the weighting stage the workers are asked to compare two different
dimensions with the pairwise comparison method. Total pairwise
comparisons for all dimensions (6 dimensions) are 15. This number of tally
for each dimension will be the dimensional weight.
2. At the rating stage, each descriptor is given a scale of 1-100, then the
employee will provide a scale in accordance with the workload that has been
experienced in his work.
3. The final score of TLX mental load is obtained by multiplying the weight by
rating each dimension, then adding up and dividing it by 15.
IV. Tables
Table 8.3 Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI)
Performance or Frustration
Performance or Effort
Frustration or Effort
Source: (Salmon, Gibbon, & Stanton, 2010)
Mental Demand: How much mental and perceptual activity was required (e.g., thinking, deciding,
calculating, remembering, looking, searching, etc)? Was the mission easy or demanding, simple or
complex, exacting or forgiving?
Low High
Physical Demand: How much physical activity was required (e.g., pushing, pulling, turning,
controlling, activating, etc.)? Was the mission easy or demanding, slow or brisk, slack or strenuous,
restful or laborious?
Low High
Temporal Demand: How much time pressure did you feel due to the rate or pace at which the
mission occurred? Was the pace slow and leisurely or rapid and frantic?
Low High
Performance: How successful do you think you were in accomplishing the goals of the mission? How
satisfied were you with your performance in accomplishing these goals?
Low High
Effort: How hard did you have to work (mentally and physically) to accomplish your level of
performance?
Low High
Frustration: How discouraged, stressed, irritated, and annoyed versus gratified, relaxed, content,
and complacent did you feel during your mission?
Low High
Source: (Salmon, Gibbon, & Stanton, 2010)
Figure 8.6 The NASA Task Load Index
V. Formulas
WWL = MD + PD + TD + PO + FR + EF
SCORE NASA TLX = WWL/15
Where:
WWL = Weighted Workload
MD = Mental Demand
PD = Phisycal Demand
TD = Temporal Demand
PO = Performance
FR = Frustration Level
EF = Effort
VI. References
1. Azemil, N., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2017). Analisis Beban Kerja Pegawai
dengan Metode National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task
Load Index. Dinamika Rekayasa, 81-88.
2. Doctors. (2015, February 4). MD Health. Retrieved from md-health.com:
http://www.md- health.com/images/10402043-lobes-of-the-brain.jpg
3. Emotiv. (2014, February 4). Emotiv | EEG System |
Electroencephalography. Retrieved from emotiv.com:
https://emotiv.com/epoc.php
4. Emotiv. (2015, February 4). Bourns College of Engineering. Retrieved from
engr.ucr.edu: http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~relu/Research/Emotiv.jpg
5. Hendriks, C., Elfferich, M., Drent, M., & De Vries, J. (2018). The Fatigue
Assessment Scale: Quality and Availability in Sarcoidosis and Other Diseases.
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 1.
6. Herman, H., Chandra, P. S., Fisher, J. E., Kastrup, M., Niaz, U., & Okasha,
A. (2009). Contemporary Topics in Women's Mental Health: Global
Perspective in a Changing Society. United Kingdom: Wiley.
7. Ild care foundation. (2014, February 5). Fatigue Assesment Scale (FAS).
Retrieved from ild care:
http://www.ildcare.nl/Downloads/forms/FAS%20questionnaire.pdf
8. Johansson , S., Charlotte, Y., Back, B., Holmqvist, L., & Koch, L. (2008).
The Swedish Ocupational Fatigue Inventory in People with Multiple
Sclerosis. J Rehabil Med, 737-743.
9. Kroemer, K. (2009). Fitting to The Human. New York: Taylor & Francis.
10. Leung, A. W., Chan, C. C., & He, J. (2004). Structural Stability and
Reliability of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory Among Chinese
VDT Workers. Applied Ergonomics, 233-241.
11. Marzbani, H., Marateb, H. R., & Mansourian, M. (2016). Neurofeedback:
A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical
Applications. Journal of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 143-158.
12. Michielsen, H., Vries, J., & Heck, G. (2003). Psychometric qualities of a
brief self-rated fatigue measure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 54 ,
345 – 352.
13. Queensland Government. (2015). Acquired Brain Injury: Brain Map.
Retrieved from Queensland Health: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/
14. Salmon, P., Gibbon, A., & Stanton, N. (2010). Human Factors Methods and
Sports Science : A Practical Guide. Florida: CRC Press.
15. Santos, J., Carvalhas, C., & Ramos, C. (2017). Portuguese Version of The
Swedish Occupational Fatugue Inventory Amonvg Assembly Workers:
Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity. International Journal of
Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 407-417.
16. Shakshi, & Jaswal, R. (2016). Brain Wave Classification and Feature
Extraction of EEG Signal by Using FFT on Lab View. International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 1208-1211.
17. Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Baber, C., & Jenkins, D. (2018). Human
Factors Methods. New York: Routledge.
18. Tatum, W. O. (2014). Handbook of EEG Interpretation. New York: Demos
Medical Publishing.
19. Trujillo , A. (2011). Evaluation of Electronic Formats of the NASA.
Virginia: ASA Ames Research Group.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Azemil, N., & Wahyuni, H. C. (2017). Analisis Beban Kerja Pegawai dengan Metode National
Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task Load Index. Dinamika Rekayasa, 81-
88.
Badiru, A. B., & Racz, L. (2015). Handbook of Measurements: Benchmarks for
Systems Accuracy and Precision. London: CRC Press.
Barney, G., & Al-Sharif, L. (2015). Elevator Traffic Handbook: Theory and Practice.
New York: Routledge.
Batista, P., Pereira, A., & Vaz, A. B. (2017). Salivary Biomarkers in Psychological
Stress Diagnosis. ARC Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9-18.
Berlin, C., & Adams, C. (2017). Production Ergonomics: Designing Work Systems to Support
Optimal Human Performance. London: Ubiquity press.
Blanchard, B. S., & Fabricky, W. J. (2014). Systems Engineering and Analysis (5th
ed.). USA: Pearson Education.
Boyle, M. A. (2015). Personal Nutrition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Bridger, R. S. (2009). Introduction to Ergonomics (3rd ed.). Boca Roton: CRC Press.
Carolina, D., Rusyanti, Y., & Susanto, A. (2017). Comparison of Salivary Alpha-Amylase
Levels in Gingivitis and Periodontitis. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi),
50(4): 216–219.
Carson, B., & Nicol, N. (2014). Discrete-Event System Simulation. United Kingdom:
Pearson Education Limited.
Chaffin, D., Anderson, G. B., & Martin, B. J. (2006). Occupational Biomechanics.
New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
Chiasson, M. E., Imbeau, D., Aubry, K., & Delisle, A. (2012). Comparing the Results
of Eight Methods Used to Evaluate Risk Factors Associated with
Musculoskeletal Disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 42,
478-486.
Doctors. (2015, February 4). MD Health. Retrieved from md-health.com:
http://www.md- health.com/images/10402043-lobes-of-the-brain.jpg
Emotiv. (2014, February 4). Emotiv | EEG System | Electroencephalography.
Retrieved from emotiv.com: https://emotiv.com/epoc.php
Emotiv. (2015, February 4). Bourns College of Engineering. Retrieved from
engr.ucr.edu: http://www.engr.ucr.edu/~relu/Research/Emotiv.jpg
Fisk, A. D., Czaja, J. S., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing
for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches (2nd ed.).
Florida: CRC Press.
Freivalds, A. (2011). Biomechanics of the Upper Limbs: Mechanics, Modeling and
Musculoskeletal Injuries. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Freivalds, A., & Niebel, B. (2009). Niebel's Methods, Standards, and Work Design
(12th ed.). USA: McGraw Hill International Edition.
Goetsch, D. L. (2015). Occupational Safety and Health for Technologist, Engineers,
and Managers (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Guangchang, P., Junbo, X., Qingsen, C., & Zhihe, H. (2014). Energy Intake, Metabolic
Homepstatis, and Human Health. Food Science and Human Wellness, 89-103.
Hales, D. (2007). An Invitation to Wellness: Making Healthy Choices. Belmont:
Cengage Learning.
Hendriks, C., Elfferich, M., Drent, M., & De Vries, J. (2018). The Fatigue Assessment Scale:
Quality and Availability in Sarcoidosis and Other Diseases. Current Opinion in
Pulmonary Medicine, 1.
Herman, H., Chandra, P. S., Fisher, J. E., Kastrup, M., Niaz, U., & Okasha, A. (2009).
Contemporary Topics in Women's Mental Health: Global Perspective in a
Changing Society. United Kingdom: Wiley.
Hoeger, W. W., Hoeger, S. A., Hoeger, I. C., & Fawson, A. L. (2017). Lifetime
Physical Fitness & Wellness A Personalized Program. Boston: Cengage
Learning.
Houglum, P. A., & Bertoti, D. B. (2012). Brunnstrom's Clinical Kinesiology.
Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.
Ild care foundation. (2014, February 5). Fatigue Assesment Scale (FAS). Retrieved
from ild care:
http://www.ildcare.nl/Downloads/forms/FAS%20questionnaire.pdf
Iridiastadi, H., & Yassierli. (2014). Ergonomi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja
Rosdakarya Offset.
Ivergard, T., & Hunt, B. (2008). Hanbook of Control Room Design and Ergonomics:
A Perspective for the Future (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Johansson , S., Charlotte, Y., Back, B., Holmqvist, L., & Koch, L. (2008). The Swedish
Ocupational Fatigue Inventory in People with Multiple Sclerosis. J Rehabil Med,
737-743.
Knudson, D. (2007). Fundamentals of Biomechanics (2nd ed.). USA: Springer.
Kroemer, K. H. (2017). Fitting the Human: Introduction to Ergonomics (7th ed.).
Florida: CRC Press.
Leung, A. W., Chan, C. C., & He, J. (2004). Structural Stability and Reliability of the
Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory Among Chinese VDT Workers.
Applied Ergonomics, 233-241.
Marzbani, H., Marateb, H. R., & Mansourian, M. (2016). Neurofeedback: A
Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical
Applications. Journal of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 143-158.
Melin, B. (2016). Work with High Levels of Mental Strees. In A. Toomingas, S. E.
Mathiassen, & E. E. Tornqvist, Occupational Physiology (183-203). Boca
Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan
Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Keselamatan dan
Kesehatan Kerja Perkantoran. Indonesia: Direktur Jenderal Peraturan
Perundang-undangan Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik
Indonesia.
Michael, E., Colin, D., Denis, O., & Whelton, H. (2012). Introduction: The Anatomy
and Physiology of Salivary Glands. London: Stephan Hancocks Limited.
Michielsen, H., Vries, J., & Heck, G. (2003). Psychometric qualities of a brief self-
rated fatigue measure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 54 , 345 – 352.
Ng, P. K., Saptari, A., & Fauzi, A. M. (2013). Hand Anthropometry: A Descriptive
Analysis on Elderly Malaysians. Malaysia: Research Gate.
NOAO. (2015, December 2). Recommended Light Levels. Retrieved from The
National Optical Astronomy Observatory:
https://www.noao.edu/education/QLTkit/ACTIVITY_Documents/Safety/Light
Levels_outdoor+indoor.pdf
Perrewe, P. L., & Ganster, D. C. (2011). The Role of Individual Differences in
Occupational Stress and Well Being. Wagon Lane, Bingley: Emerald Group.
Queensland Government. (2015). Acquired Brain Injury: Brain Map. Retrieved from
Queensland Health: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/
Salmon, P., Gibbon, A., & Stanton, N. (2010). Human Factors Methods and Sports
Science : A Practical Guide. Florida: CRC Press.
Samara, T. (2014). Design Elements A Graphic Style Manual (2nd ed.). Beverly:
Rockport Publishers.
Santos, J., Carvalhas, C., & Ramos, C. (2017). Portuguese Version of The Swedish
Occupational Fatugue Inventory Amonvg Assembly Workers: Cultural Adaptation,
Reliability, and Validity. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and
Environmental Health, 407-417.
Scott, P., Kogi, K., & McPhee, B. (2010). Ergonomic Guidelines For Occupational
Health Practice In Industrially Developing Countries. Germany: University of
Darmstadt.
Shakshi, & Jaswal, R. (2016). Brain Wave Classification and Feature Extraction of
EEG Signal by Using FFT on Lab View. International Research Journal of
Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 1208-1211.
Shim, J. D. (2009). The Pockets MBA. Los Alamitos: Delta Publishing Company.
Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Baber, C., & Jenkins, D. (2018). Human Factors
Methods. New York: Routledge
Trujillo , A. (2011). Evaluation of Electronic Formats of the NASA. Virginia .
Widyanti, A., Johnson, A., & Waard, D. (2010). Pengukuran Beban Kerja Mental
dalam Searching Task Dengan Metode Rating Scale Mental Effort.